WEBVTT

NOTE Production: The Structure

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.480
I consider this one of the most inventive chapters in Man Economy and State,

2
00:00:05.480 --> 00:00:12.520
because not only does Rothbard use Mises' concept of the evenly rotating economy

3
00:00:12.520 --> 00:00:16.280
to deduce theorems about production,

4
00:00:16.280 --> 00:00:21.080
but he also invents a concept of a world of specific factors,

5
00:00:21.080 --> 00:00:25.480
and that's unrealistic, as we'll see.

6
00:00:25.480 --> 00:00:33.680
But it allows Rothbard to elucidate the precise nature of costs in production.

7
00:00:33.680 --> 00:00:36.580
So what we're going to do is go through those two concepts

8
00:00:36.580 --> 00:00:43.780
and then show how they're useful in economic theorizing.

9
00:00:43.780 --> 00:00:52.780
In fact, these mental constructs are really the essence of economics, praxeological economics.

10
00:00:52.780 --> 00:00:58.580
Mises in fact says that the method of mental constructs is a specific method of praxeology.

11
00:00:58.580 --> 00:01:01.580
That's a direct quote from Human Action.

12
00:01:01.580 --> 00:01:04.780
So Rothbard begins with Mises' evenly rotating economy.

13
00:01:04.780 --> 00:01:09.680
And here there's a little bit of ambiguity, maybe even confusion.

14
00:01:09.680 --> 00:01:16.380
There's really two different concepts of equilibrium in Mises, of unachievable equilibrium.

15
00:01:16.380 --> 00:01:20.980
One is known as the evenly rotating economy of the ERE.

16
00:01:20.980 --> 00:01:25.780
That deals with constancy. That deals with a world of absolutely no change.

17
00:01:25.780 --> 00:01:30.580
That deals with a world of robotical reaction rather than human reaction.

18
00:01:30.580 --> 00:01:38.180
That is applicable, as we'll see later on, to distinguishing between interest and profit.

19
00:01:38.180 --> 00:01:46.380
There's a complex of returns, of income returns to the firm, and they must be isolated and analyzed.

20
00:01:46.380 --> 00:01:49.480
It also sheds light on the nature of entrepreneurship.

21
00:01:49.480 --> 00:02:03.640
But there's also something that Mises calls the final state of rest or FSR, which is a concept of slow change.

22
00:02:03.640 --> 00:02:10.280
That is, changes are assumed to take place one at a time.

23
00:02:10.280 --> 00:02:16.880
One change will fully work itself out before another change intervenes.

24
00:02:16.880 --> 00:02:24.480
The reason why we need this construct is to be able to isolate and examine the nature of market adjustment processes.

25
00:02:24.480 --> 00:02:29.140
As we'll see, if there's an increase in the price of oil, we'll see a plain state of rest immediately.

26
00:02:29.140 --> 00:02:33.440
Demand goes up. I'm sorry, the demand for demand goes up. Price goes up.

27
00:02:33.440 --> 00:02:38.780
Entrepreneurs start to make plans for the future. But that's at that precise moment.

28
00:02:38.780 --> 00:02:43.920
If nothing else were to change, then there would be a series of adjustments of the entire economy

29
00:02:43.920 --> 00:02:48.160
that may take many years or even decades to that change in the price of oil.

30
00:02:48.160 --> 00:02:54.520
So what the final state of rest does is to assume that no other change intervenes

31
00:02:54.520 --> 00:02:59.720
until the entire production structure, the entire capital structure,

32
00:02:59.720 --> 00:03:06.560
the entire pattern of allocation of resources is readjusted to that change in demand.

33
00:03:06.560 --> 00:03:13.400
So in this chapter, Rothbard is actually talking about the final state of rest.

34
00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:15.240
or actually using it.

35
00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:18.640
Now, the final state of rest is a situation in which

36
00:03:18.640 --> 00:03:20.760
when the economy is again finally adjusted,

37
00:03:20.760 --> 00:03:24.160
we know it, or we know conceptually that will be finally adjusted

38
00:03:24.160 --> 00:03:27.120
when there are no more profits or losses.

39
00:03:27.120 --> 00:03:29.240
If no other change intervenes,

40
00:03:29.240 --> 00:03:31.720
if no other change, exogenous change is introduced,

41
00:03:31.720 --> 00:03:35.480
no other change in tastes, technology, available resources,

42
00:03:35.480 --> 00:03:38.440
skills of the population, weather patterns,

43
00:03:38.440 --> 00:03:40.040
everything is frozen,

44
00:03:40.040 --> 00:03:44.400
Then the economy will fall into an evenly rotating state,

45
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:50.000
or rather an evenly rotating situation in which it repeats itself,

46
00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:54.000
day after day or season after season, okay?

47
00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:56.880
That then is another construct.

48
00:03:56.880 --> 00:04:01.560
So when Rothbard says it's the ever-shifting goal of human action,

49
00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:04.920
what he means is that eventually if there's one change

50
00:04:04.920 --> 00:04:07.920
and there's a full adjustment to that change and no other change occurs,

51
00:04:07.920 --> 00:04:10.020
Then you'll have the evenly rotating economy.

52
00:04:10.020 --> 00:04:16.620
So there is a connection between the final state of rest and the evenly rotating economy.

53
00:04:16.620 --> 00:04:19.920
So we want to, we live in a real world of a continual change in data.

54
00:04:19.920 --> 00:04:24.020
When I use the term economic data, I'm going to refer to value scales,

55
00:04:24.020 --> 00:04:29.020
or what neoclassically economists call tastes and preferences.

56
00:04:29.020 --> 00:04:31.020
Available resources.

57
00:04:31.020 --> 00:04:35.820
I'm going to include in available resources, not just natural resources,

58
00:04:35.820 --> 00:04:40.580
but also labor skills, labor aptitudes,

59
00:04:40.580 --> 00:04:43.140
desirability that people have for different types of labor,

60
00:04:43.140 --> 00:04:48.140
as well as features of our world that may not even really be good in any sense,

61
00:04:48.140 --> 00:04:51.140
like weather patterns, okay?

62
00:04:51.140 --> 00:04:56.420
Anything that can affect production is going to be frozen, right?

63
00:04:56.420 --> 00:05:04.660
Also, there are no depletable natural resources in the evenly rotating economy, okay?

64
00:05:04.660 --> 00:05:13.660
Or if there are, then as one source of, let's say, oil or a mineral is completely depleted,

65
00:05:13.660 --> 00:05:20.660
a new source is just found serendipitously at the time that the other source is completely depleted.

66
00:05:20.660 --> 00:05:23.660
We can assume, we don't have to assume that people are immortal,

67
00:05:23.660 --> 00:05:28.160
but we do assume that as one person leaves the labor force,

68
00:05:28.160 --> 00:05:33.660
someone with the exact same skills replaces him, enters the labor force.

69
00:05:33.660 --> 00:05:35.660
So all these things are frozen.

70
00:05:35.660 --> 00:05:42.660
What's important is not the actual way that we frame this unrealizable construct,

71
00:05:42.660 --> 00:05:45.660
but it's an instrument.

72
00:05:45.660 --> 00:05:56.660
And the instrument is one that will allow us to shed light on change by freezing change in a logical way,

73
00:05:56.660 --> 00:06:02.660
by exhausting any possible avenue by which there can be a change in the data.

74
00:06:02.660 --> 00:06:07.860
Okay, so now what about the final state of rest?

75
00:06:07.860 --> 00:06:13.660
The final state of rest is a situation in which the economy has come to rest, okay,

76
00:06:13.660 --> 00:06:17.860
in the sense that all adjustments have been made, there are no profits and losses,

77
00:06:17.860 --> 00:06:19.460
there are no entrepreneurial profits and losses,

78
00:06:19.460 --> 00:06:22.860
capitalists do earn an interest return, an equal interest return,

79
00:06:22.860 --> 00:06:26.260
let's say everyone earns 10% on all the investments in the economy,

80
00:06:26.260 --> 00:06:31.340
So, we would say that the economy is producing those goods,

81
00:06:31.340 --> 00:06:36.980
which satisfy the most urgent wants of the consumers in the most economical way.

82
00:06:36.980 --> 00:06:43.300
Okay, using the best available technology or the most economical of the available technologies.

83
00:06:43.300 --> 00:06:47.900
Suddenly something happens in that situation.

84
00:06:47.900 --> 00:06:51.140
Let's say there's an increase in demand for oil, big increase in demand for oil.

85
00:06:51.140 --> 00:06:56.140
Okay, so Rockwell points out that there's really two phases in this analysis.

86
00:06:56.140 --> 00:07:00.580
He calls it evenly rotating economy analysis, but it's really the final state of rest analysis.

87
00:07:00.580 --> 00:07:04.340
One period is a transition to the final state of rest.

88
00:07:04.340 --> 00:07:10.500
The other is the new final state of rest itself, which emerges.

89
00:07:10.500 --> 00:07:16.580
When that final state of rest emerges, and I'll give you a sort of a visual of this,

90
00:07:16.580 --> 00:07:22.740
what happens is that the pattern of prices is such that if no other changes are introduced into the economy,

91
00:07:22.740 --> 00:07:25.060
that pattern of price will repeat itself every day.

92
00:07:25.060 --> 00:07:29.260
It's not to say there's no, as Jeff, Dr. Herbert reported out,

93
00:07:29.260 --> 00:07:37.780
that there's no change or there's no reappearance of people's value scales every day or every week or whatever it is.

94
00:07:37.780 --> 00:07:43.140
People going to market, new stocks coming into the market, okay, all of that goes on, okay.

95
00:07:43.140 --> 00:07:50.380
The exchange doesn't halt, it just goes on in the same way as the day before and the day before that and so on.

96
00:07:50.380 --> 00:07:59.980
So let's, let me just give you a graph that represents one use of this final state of rest analysis.

97
00:07:59.980 --> 00:08:08.980
It's up here.

98
00:08:08.980 --> 00:08:10.680
Okay.

99
00:08:10.680 --> 00:08:16.180
We're currently at point, at this point right here.

100
00:08:16.180 --> 00:08:19.680
Let's assume that's the intersection of the demand and supply for oil.

101
00:08:19.680 --> 00:08:27.340
The relevant curves are the vertical S1, that's the stock of oil at that moment in time,

102
00:08:27.340 --> 00:08:34.080
and the instantaneous demand curve D1, there's a certain price and a certain quantity,

103
00:08:34.080 --> 00:08:36.380
determined by the intersection.

104
00:08:36.380 --> 00:08:43.540
Suddenly there's an increase in the demand for oil globally on the part of China and India and so on.

105
00:08:43.540 --> 00:08:49.340
Immediately there's an increase in demand, or in price rather.

106
00:08:49.340 --> 00:08:56.740
There's a new plain state of rest, so that price is now much higher than it was before, it jumps from P1 to P2, okay?

107
00:08:56.740 --> 00:09:03.440
That, we actually observe that in the real world, okay? That's the exchange equilibrium that we've been talking about.

108
00:09:03.440 --> 00:09:11.140
That's a change in value scales that drives the price up, that price emerges in the real world, people economize on their use of oil, okay?

109
00:09:11.140 --> 00:09:17.440
People who have not had that change in value because they have to cut back.

110
00:09:17.440 --> 00:09:20.280
Others who experience the change in value scales

111
00:09:20.280 --> 00:09:27.200
are the ones that bid up the price of oil, those people in firms and so on in India and China.

112
00:09:27.200 --> 00:09:31.520
But what happens? Suddenly now there's these huge profits,

113
00:09:31.520 --> 00:09:34.680
far above all profits of other firms in the economy.

114
00:09:34.680 --> 00:09:38.200
Now, if at that moment we freeze the economic data,

115
00:09:38.200 --> 00:09:43.040
we don't allow any changes in value scales, technology and so on,

116
00:09:43.040 --> 00:09:48.120
What's going to happen over time, and it's going to take time, that's the key to this analysis,

117
00:09:48.120 --> 00:09:54.560
is that entrepreneurs that are already in the industry will begin to make plans to expand their oil.

118
00:09:54.560 --> 00:09:59.320
Okay, refineries will put on second and third shifts, will begin to get an increase in supply.

119
00:09:59.320 --> 00:10:07.480
So the instantaneous supply curve will shift down from S1 to S2, driving the price down somewhat.

120
00:10:07.480 --> 00:10:11.600
There'll be a series of these changes that will occur one after the other.

121
00:10:11.600 --> 00:10:17.760
As more time elapses, entrepreneurs will begin to add to their plant,

122
00:10:17.760 --> 00:10:22.440
to bring into production old equipment, so refineries will expand.

123
00:10:22.440 --> 00:10:29.160
The same time, firms that provide oil drilling equipment will begin to gear up and produce more.

124
00:10:29.160 --> 00:10:36.480
You'll have Wildcat speculators who, I don't know if the word speculators,

125
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:40.080
but those people that look for new oil explorers,

126
00:10:40.080 --> 00:10:43.800
They'll begin to gear up and begin to explore for more oil.

127
00:10:43.800 --> 00:10:46.600
And over time, the supply of oil will increase.

128
00:10:46.600 --> 00:10:53.640
It will continue to increase until we reach some final state of rest.

129
00:10:53.640 --> 00:10:56.560
That is, there'll be a new price, it'll be higher than the old price.

130
00:10:56.560 --> 00:11:02.880
It will be P, F for final state of rest, prime.

131
00:11:02.880 --> 00:11:09.160
At that point, as the supply is increased, all profits in the oil industry will be wiped out.

132
00:11:09.160 --> 00:11:14.360
More resources will have been allocated from the rest of the economy to producing oil, okay?

133
00:11:17.760 --> 00:11:22.160
There'll be a lot of other changes that have occurred in the economy, which I'll get to in a moment.

134
00:11:22.160 --> 00:11:28.360
But the other thing that will happen is that resources that specifically produce oil

135
00:11:28.360 --> 00:11:33.560
or more or less specific to the oil producing industry will now have a higher price, okay?

136
00:11:33.560 --> 00:11:35.160
They'll be bid up in price.

137
00:11:35.160 --> 00:11:38.760
So therefore, the so-called cost of production will be higher.

138
00:11:38.760 --> 00:11:45.800
The price will fall no lower than this P.F. crime, okay?

139
00:11:45.800 --> 00:11:53.360
What we call the marginal revenue products of all factors will be the same in the oil industry as they are elsewhere.

140
00:11:53.360 --> 00:11:54.960
So wages will be the same again.

141
00:11:54.960 --> 00:12:02.160
Initially, wages will be bid up, okay, as entrepreneurs begin to react to these profits by hiring more workers

142
00:12:02.160 --> 00:12:08.720
and also by renting more equipment and demand and purchasing more equipment, okay?

143
00:12:08.720 --> 00:12:12.220
So we have traced out the full adjustment.

144
00:12:12.220 --> 00:12:17.220
Now, this can take not just years, but it could take decades.

145
00:12:17.220 --> 00:12:19.720
So it doesn't happen right away.

146
00:12:19.720 --> 00:12:25.720
And in fact, at the next moment, in the real world, after the price of oil shoots up,

147
00:12:25.720 --> 00:12:27.220
there are other changes.

148
00:12:27.220 --> 00:12:30.720
At the same time, there's a complex of changes going on

149
00:12:30.720 --> 00:12:35.220
that have nothing to do with the oil industry, other exogenous changes at that moment.

150
00:12:35.220 --> 00:12:37.220
Why is this useful?

151
00:12:37.220 --> 00:12:42.420
It allows us to know what direction any particular change is pushing the economy in.

152
00:12:42.420 --> 00:12:47.320
As applied economists, we then have to, with this analysis,

153
00:12:47.320 --> 00:12:50.320
you know, given this analysis, okay, that we've absorbed,

154
00:12:50.320 --> 00:12:55.620
we have to then use our insight and our historical insight

155
00:12:55.620 --> 00:13:00.220
and try to then see what's going to be the ultimate outcome of all these changes.

156
00:13:00.220 --> 00:13:04.620
There might be increases in commodities at the same time as the increase in the price of copper, for example,

157
00:13:04.620 --> 00:13:08.180
the same time as there is an increase in the price of oil.

158
00:13:08.180 --> 00:13:12.820
Well, copper may be used in oil equipment and that could slow down the adjustment

159
00:13:12.820 --> 00:13:15.780
or could counteract the adjustment, could drive costs up before

160
00:13:15.780 --> 00:13:18.860
and erode profits in the oil industry.

161
00:13:18.860 --> 00:13:24.100
We have to know this analysis in order to be able to make an educated prediction

162
00:13:24.100 --> 00:13:27.580
of what Hayek would call pattern prediction of the outcome

163
00:13:27.580 --> 00:13:30.860
of all the relevant processes occurring at any given moment in time.

164
00:13:30.860 --> 00:13:37.160
Okay, so we're not saying that economics uses this mental construct

165
00:13:37.160 --> 00:13:42.060
because things do happen one time, or one step at a time, or one change at a time.

166
00:13:42.060 --> 00:13:43.760
We're not saying that, okay?

167
00:13:43.760 --> 00:13:48.760
We're saying that in order to grasp the full tissue of adjustment processes,

168
00:13:48.760 --> 00:13:52.360
which are all interrelated and interlinked at any given time,

169
00:13:52.360 --> 00:13:58.360
you have to be able to know how each change will drive the economy.

170
00:13:58.360 --> 00:14:12.920
So in other words, in this example, I point out that in this particular change will be an increase of demand for oil, push up the price, profits represented by pie will increase, and then the various instantaneous supplies will increase over time.

171
00:14:12.920 --> 00:14:17.800
But also, the price of oil is the cost of production in plastic.

172
00:14:17.800 --> 00:14:24.760
So there'll be a fall in the supply of plastic, an increase in the price of plastic.

173
00:14:24.760 --> 00:14:27.520
Kids next Christmas will get fewer skateboards,

174
00:14:27.520 --> 00:14:31.320
because the price of plastic or plastic is an input into skateboards.

175
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:34.040
Of course, the production of skateboards will go up, there will be fewer skateboards.

176
00:14:34.040 --> 00:14:38.880
That will increase the demand for a substitute for Christmas.

177
00:14:38.880 --> 00:14:41.800
Let's say video games, the demand for video games will go up.

178
00:14:41.800 --> 00:14:44.600
There will be an increase in demand for work in the video game industry.

179
00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:52.560
All of these things are endogenous changes that result from a change in the price of oil.

180
00:14:52.560 --> 00:14:58.460
So even if you assume one change, there's still very complex changes that are going on throughout the economy

181
00:14:58.460 --> 00:15:01.660
that is being analyzed in this state of rest.

182
00:15:01.660 --> 00:15:06.160
So the entire economy is revolutionized by that one change.

183
00:15:06.160 --> 00:15:09.860
So that the new final state of rest is one that doesn't look any...

184
00:15:09.860 --> 00:15:12.960
It's not just that there's a different price of oil, there's more oil being produced.

185
00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:16.760
Doesn't look anything like the prior state of rest.

186
00:15:16.760 --> 00:15:19.860
That is the way the economy looked at P1, okay,

187
00:15:19.860 --> 00:15:23.260
where we were assuming that there was a final state of rest which we call,

188
00:15:23.260 --> 00:15:26.580
that that price was a final state of rest price equal to P.F.

189
00:15:26.580 --> 00:15:31.100
That is, at that point, whatever other changes had occurred, stopped.

190
00:15:31.100 --> 00:15:40.060
So this analysis is bounded on both sides by this fully adjusted economy.

191
00:15:40.060 --> 00:15:49.140
So this shows us also the function of profits and losses in moving resources around the economy.

192
00:15:49.140 --> 00:16:03.140
Let me use you as guinea pigs and put up a little graph to sort of show this, this analysis, sort of something new that came up with, I have it here.

193
00:16:03.140 --> 00:16:28.140
Yeah. Peter Klein and I are writing a book on the fundamentals of economic analysis and I was coming up with a graph to try to explain or visual to try to explain the relation of the final state of rest, the plane state of rest in the economy.

194
00:16:28.140 --> 00:16:33.940
If you look at the horizontal axis, that's historical time, and let's say it's in market days.

195
00:16:33.940 --> 00:16:40.340
The PSRs are the prices we see when we look out these windows.

196
00:16:40.340 --> 00:16:45.740
They're the actual prices that are being paid at the gas stations along College Avenue.

197
00:16:45.740 --> 00:16:49.940
The actual price being paid at the Peter Pitt pit and Cheeseburger Downtown.

198
00:16:49.940 --> 00:16:53.740
Actual price is being paid at Super Walmart, okay, right now.

199
00:16:53.740 --> 00:17:02.460
There is a structure of prices in the economy that are emerging from people's value scales and the stocks available.

200
00:17:02.460 --> 00:17:04.380
And that's what happens in the real world.

201
00:17:04.380 --> 00:17:08.820
We move through historical time from one state of rest to the next.

202
00:17:08.820 --> 00:17:15.620
The changes that occur today, today being the today's plain state of rest,

203
00:17:15.620 --> 00:17:18.660
set up processes that begin to work themselves out,

204
00:17:18.660 --> 00:17:26.660
are buffeted and changed and moved around by other changes tomorrow and the day after.

205
00:17:26.660 --> 00:17:28.660
So every day there's a new plain state of arrest emerging.

206
00:17:28.660 --> 00:17:34.660
Actually every moment I use market day as a sort of representative of that.

207
00:17:34.660 --> 00:17:43.660
However, if we were to right now freeze all changes, we were to freeze technology and so on and value scales,

208
00:17:43.660 --> 00:17:50.660
and Value Scales, then we would stop moving along historical time and move along a notional analytical time.

209
00:17:50.660 --> 00:17:58.660
We would move up this line, okay, towards this goal, what Rothbard calls the goal of human action.

210
00:17:58.660 --> 00:18:04.660
That is this revolution in the economy that will occur and it will eventually...

211
00:18:04.660 --> 00:18:08.660
Now here we're freezing all the data, okay, and there's many, many changes.

212
00:18:08.660 --> 00:18:11.660
It's going to take decades for all of these changes that have just occurred

213
00:18:11.660 --> 00:18:14.500
and that have occurred in the past and have not been fully worked out

214
00:18:14.500 --> 00:18:18.660
to work themselves out into a new final state of rest.

215
00:18:18.660 --> 00:18:24.620
I've drawn the lines deliberately of different lengths, the vertical lines,

216
00:18:24.620 --> 00:18:30.340
to show that sometimes we're closer, sometimes we're further away from this final state of rest,

217
00:18:30.340 --> 00:18:32.980
depending on entrepreneurs anticipating what's going on,

218
00:18:32.980 --> 00:18:36.580
depending on whether processes reinforce one another or counteract one another.

219
00:18:36.580 --> 00:18:37.380
It doesn't matter.

220
00:18:37.380 --> 00:18:42.500
We never reach the red points, which represent final states of rest in the economy, okay?

221
00:18:42.500 --> 00:18:47.020
So Rothbard says that, so when other changes occur, we're now at PSR2,

222
00:18:47.020 --> 00:18:51.540
if things were to be frozen tomorrow, we would move up towards FSR2.

223
00:18:51.540 --> 00:18:59.220
Every plain state of rest has a final state of rest to which it is tending, okay?

224
00:18:59.220 --> 00:19:04.620
And to which profits and losses will push it, and at which point profits and losses,

225
00:19:04.620 --> 00:19:14.020
When the final state, when the economic adjustment processes culminate in the final state of rest, those profits and losses will become nil.

226
00:19:14.020 --> 00:19:25.220
Now, if nothing happens, if we reach this point, there are no more changes, then the evenly rotating economy will come into being.

227
00:19:25.220 --> 00:19:29.220
So that's the relationship between the two.

228
00:19:29.220 --> 00:19:33.520
It's a little bit more explicit in Mises than it is in Rothbard.

229
00:19:33.520 --> 00:19:35.420
Rothbard will take the shortcut and says,

230
00:19:35.420 --> 00:19:38.920
well, it's a tentative, evenly rotating economy.

231
00:19:38.920 --> 00:19:41.420
Well, that's not quite true, okay,

232
00:19:41.420 --> 00:19:44.320
because the evenly rotating economy is such that

233
00:19:44.320 --> 00:19:47.520
people don't even have expectations of future.

234
00:19:47.520 --> 00:19:49.620
With the final state of rest analysis,

235
00:19:49.620 --> 00:19:51.520
people tend, expectations can change.

236
00:19:51.520 --> 00:19:55.520
In fact, that's one of the changes that we analyze from day to day, okay?

237
00:19:55.520 --> 00:19:57.320
What will happen to the economy if nothing else changes,

238
00:19:57.320 --> 00:20:01.020
but expectations about some source of supply,

239
00:20:01.020 --> 00:20:03.260
about some demand in the future, okay?

240
00:20:06.340 --> 00:20:09.620
So I hope you like my sort of innovative diagram.

241
00:20:09.620 --> 00:20:10.940
Actually, I had come up with this a while,

242
00:20:10.940 --> 00:20:15.020
I give this at the Austrian Colloquium at NYU

243
00:20:15.020 --> 00:20:20.020
and in relation to another paper that I was giving.

244
00:20:20.560 --> 00:20:23.940
And the response was, everyone looked at Israel Kirzner

245
00:20:23.940 --> 00:20:26.300
and said, well, didn't you draw something like that

246
00:20:26.300 --> 00:20:27.900
in the 60s or something like that?

247
00:20:27.900 --> 00:20:28.740
So he says, yeah, I did.

248
00:20:28.740 --> 00:20:29.580
Oh, well, that's good, you know?

249
00:20:29.580 --> 00:20:34.580
So it was good because it was sort of, Israel had drawn it once before.

250
00:20:34.580 --> 00:20:38.580
He said, not exactly. He said, Professor Salerno, this is an innovation.

251
00:20:38.580 --> 00:20:45.580
And he says, I had something like that. He's always very kind and very generous in that respect.

252
00:20:45.580 --> 00:20:48.580
Okay.

253
00:20:48.580 --> 00:20:53.580
All right. Now let me say some words about the evenly rotating economy.

254
00:20:53.580 --> 00:21:09.580
The only way to rotate the economy is important not for grasping adjustment processes but for grasping the distinction between profit and loss and also a distinction between profit and interest and also grasping the function of the entrepreneur.

255
00:21:09.580 --> 00:21:16.580
Rothbard has many good things to say about the ERE.

256
00:21:16.580 --> 00:21:19.940
First of all, let me give you an idea of the ERE.

257
00:21:19.940 --> 00:21:23.540
If you're in the ERE and nothing is changing,

258
00:21:23.540 --> 00:21:31.420
that is implications for the production process, the production structure.

259
00:21:31.420 --> 00:21:36.580
What we assume in the ERE is this, that the prices of goods,

260
00:21:36.580 --> 00:21:44.300
now or in the future, are known to people as openly and as clearly as you can see this $20 bill.

261
00:21:44.300 --> 00:21:58.300
We know exactly what the price of, let's say, a VCR is now, or an LCD television is right now, okay, now and in the future, and it's unchanging.

262
00:21:58.300 --> 00:22:05.800
Every day, people's values, people come into the markets with their value skills, which have not changed, stocks are produced, which do not change.

263
00:22:05.800 --> 00:22:09.900
So there are plain states of rest, but they're exactly like every other plain state of rest.

264
00:22:09.900 --> 00:22:14.200
So the economy moves, but it evenly rotates.

265
00:22:14.200 --> 00:22:23.560
So, if in fact, everyone knows the price of all goods, as you know the price of this $20 bill or as you see this $20 bill,

266
00:22:23.560 --> 00:22:27.160
and let's assume you trust me completely, implicitly trust me,

267
00:22:27.160 --> 00:22:35.280
and I tell you that in one year's time, I will hand this $20 bill to you, how much will I be bid for this?

268
00:22:35.280 --> 00:22:39.080
Let's say you're all entrepreneurs, because entrepreneurs are the ones who are bidding, okay?

269
00:22:39.080 --> 00:22:41.520
Actually, again, that's an inconsistency in the ERE.

270
00:22:41.520 --> 00:22:43.600
There are no entrepreneurs,

271
00:22:43.600 --> 00:22:48.960
but there are sort of these people that are producers that bring the factors together.

272
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:52.680
But in any case, the price would be very close to $20.

273
00:22:52.680 --> 00:22:55.920
And assuming that people have time preference and they still do in the ERE,

274
00:22:55.920 --> 00:23:02.120
the price might be $19.50, depending on what the social rate of time preference is.

275
00:23:02.120 --> 00:23:05.080
So all prices would be exactly the same.

276
00:23:05.080 --> 00:23:09.400
All prices would be, rather all prices would never change over time.

277
00:23:09.400 --> 00:23:13.640
All prices of goods would be equal to their so-called cost of production.

278
00:23:13.640 --> 00:23:18.480
We'll talk about that. It's actually the prices determining the cost, as we'll see.

279
00:23:18.480 --> 00:23:21.120
There'd be no room for profit or loss.

280
00:23:21.120 --> 00:23:25.600
There would be really no room for the entrepreneur.

281
00:23:25.600 --> 00:23:30.320
The factors of production really couldn't come together spontaneously.

282
00:23:30.320 --> 00:23:31.840
There would be no room for money, as we'll see.

283
00:23:31.840 --> 00:23:38.640
So let me talk about what Rothbard sees as characteristics of this ERE.

284
00:23:38.640 --> 00:23:44.740
The ERE in the language of neoclassical economics is the long-run equilibrium,

285
00:23:44.740 --> 00:23:51.040
which departures from, according to neoclassical economics, are monopolistic.

286
00:23:51.040 --> 00:23:57.240
So if there are profits in the real world, if there's advertising in the real world,

287
00:23:57.240 --> 00:24:00.940
well, there has to be something suspect about that.

288
00:24:00.940 --> 00:24:04.240
There has to be something inefficient about that, because everybody knows everything in the ERE.

289
00:24:04.240 --> 00:24:07.540
Why do we need advertising, except to manipulate consumers?

290
00:24:07.540 --> 00:24:18.040
Why are there profits, except if there's a restriction of supply somehow, or market barriers to entry?

291
00:24:18.040 --> 00:24:23.240
So Rothbard points out the following. He says, first of all, that the ERE is an ethically neutral tool.

292
00:24:23.240 --> 00:24:24.640
It's not an optimum position.

293
00:24:24.640 --> 00:24:34.340
Why would we think that, you know, people robotically going through the same sort of motions every day and actions and so on,

294
00:24:34.340 --> 00:24:40.240
why would we think that that's sort of ethically superior to spontaneous indeterminate human action?

295
00:24:40.240 --> 00:24:42.340
Okay, it's certainly not.

296
00:24:42.340 --> 00:24:43.840
It's a useful analytical tool.

297
00:24:43.840 --> 00:24:48.640
It's not only unrealistic, but it's also unrealizable.

298
00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:51.840
We can... action means change.

299
00:24:51.840 --> 00:24:58.640
If we believe that tomorrow will be like today and next year like this year, we would never act.

300
00:24:58.640 --> 00:25:03.640
Okay, so there's not real action in the ERE.

301
00:25:03.640 --> 00:25:14.140
There's nothing ethically better about the ERE or the final state of rest as it implies really a cessation of all one satisfaction.

302
00:25:14.140 --> 00:25:20.340
There's zero props and losses, as I said, and that's why should that be legitimate?

303
00:25:20.340 --> 00:25:26.440
Why should we say that an unrealizable goal sets the standard for economic efficiency?

304
00:25:26.440 --> 00:25:29.940
It certainly does not.

305
00:25:29.940 --> 00:25:37.140
It also can be described because it is static in a system of equations.

306
00:25:37.140 --> 00:25:44.740
And these equations suppress the causal element in human action.

307
00:25:44.740 --> 00:25:50.140
The fact that human action causes change, causes adjustments to anticipated changes.

308
00:25:50.140 --> 00:25:58.700
and so on. It uses functions, we know that our functional relationships among

309
00:25:58.700 --> 00:26:05.460
variables rest on the notion of determination, whereas again human

310
00:26:05.460 --> 00:26:10.660
reason and will and action are all indeterminate. Also this mathematical

311
00:26:10.660 --> 00:26:13.740
analysis, which you can conduct of the ERE, which you don't need to conduct,

312
00:26:13.740 --> 00:26:18.540
violates Occam's razor, multiplies entities unnecessarily. We can

313
00:26:18.540 --> 00:26:26.940
We can describe the ERE in words, as I've done, and we can describe it precisely and exactly, and adequately for our purposes.

314
00:26:26.940 --> 00:26:32.740
We don't need math to do it. And I'll follow those all with a number of other criticisms.

315
00:26:32.740 --> 00:26:37.140
Okay, I don't want to spend too much time on this.

316
00:26:37.140 --> 00:26:45.140
One last thing I want to do say about this is that there is no monetary demand in the evenly rotating economy,

317
00:26:45.140 --> 00:26:52.500
Because everyone knows exactly what their expenditures and incomes will be on every single day, okay?

318
00:26:52.500 --> 00:26:57.700
So if you're going to need money, a certain sum of money, tomorrow at a certain time,

319
00:26:57.700 --> 00:27:03.780
there will arise various investments that will allow you, that will mature at that period of time,

320
00:27:03.780 --> 00:27:05.980
will allow you to earn an interest rate. There will be no demand for money.

321
00:27:05.980 --> 00:27:10.380
If there were really no demand for money, then if the demand for money fell to zero,

322
00:27:10.380 --> 00:27:17.980
Let's say as you're approaching the the ERE or the FSR, as people became more and more certain of what was going to be the future,

323
00:27:17.980 --> 00:27:22.980
prices would explode upward as everyone would try to get rid of their cash balances, okay?

324
00:27:22.980 --> 00:27:28.380
That's why real money is not used in the classical economics, but a numeraire is used, okay?

325
00:27:28.380 --> 00:27:31.680
That's why it sort of degenerates into border, okay?

326
00:27:31.680 --> 00:27:40.180
Okay, let me very quickly talk about Rothbard's invention, okay, and that is the world of specific factors.

327
00:27:40.180 --> 00:27:47.060
What he assumes in this construct is that every human being,

328
00:27:47.060 --> 00:27:56.980
every piece of land on the earth can be used in one and only one process of production.

329
00:27:56.980 --> 00:28:02.180
A diamond miner can do nothing else except be a diamond miner.

330
00:28:02.180 --> 00:28:05.460
He's incapable of any sort of work, other work.

331
00:28:05.460 --> 00:28:14.760
An economist can only give economics lectures and maybe, you know, do research, but nothing else, and so on.

332
00:28:14.760 --> 00:28:23.060
So everyone can only be employed in a valuable way in one process of production.

333
00:28:23.060 --> 00:28:26.460
And again, every piece of land has its own use.

334
00:28:26.460 --> 00:28:32.560
Now, in the real world, factors are, most factors are relatively non-specific.

335
00:28:32.560 --> 00:28:47.560
No factor is purely nonspecific, meaning that it can have equal efficiency in all different processes of production, okay?

336
00:28:47.560 --> 00:28:56.160
If that were the case, if all factors were purely not, you can't think that through, if all factors were purely nonspecific, there would only really be one factor.

337
00:28:56.160 --> 00:29:02.160
If they had all equal capability in all processes of production, and you can't really have one factor.

338
00:29:02.160 --> 00:29:06.640
You have to have more than one factor in order to have production.

339
00:29:06.640 --> 00:29:09.000
In other words, it has to be a combination of things

340
00:29:09.000 --> 00:29:14.080
so they can be transformed into something else.

341
00:29:14.080 --> 00:29:17.520
So in the real world, we have some specific factors like a diamond mine.

342
00:29:17.520 --> 00:29:20.240
That's specific to the production of diamonds.

343
00:29:20.240 --> 00:29:22.960
But most land is relatively nonspecific.

344
00:29:22.960 --> 00:29:27.360
It might be better for best for producing corn,

345
00:29:27.360 --> 00:29:31.080
but it can also produce soybeans and other sorts of crops.

346
00:29:31.080 --> 00:29:32.360
Same thing with human beings.

347
00:29:32.360 --> 00:29:36.040
They might be best at one thing, but if the man conditions change,

348
00:29:36.040 --> 00:29:38.640
then they can go into other things.

349
00:29:38.640 --> 00:29:42.240
Their marginal product will change, their marginal revenue product will change,

350
00:29:42.240 --> 00:29:45.120
they may have lower wages, but again,

351
00:29:45.120 --> 00:29:50.280
labor is the most nonspecific, by the way, of all the factors, okay?

352
00:29:50.280 --> 00:29:53.720
No labor is completely specific.

353
00:29:53.720 --> 00:29:57.960
So, Rothbard then shows what production would look like here.

354
00:30:01.080 --> 00:30:05.080
And basically, let me get a tight shot of that.

355
00:30:14.080 --> 00:30:17.080
These are two different production processes, A and B.

356
00:30:18.080 --> 00:30:23.080
Beginning at the third stage, two stages removed from the consumer,

357
00:30:24.080 --> 00:30:29.080
you would have the three factors producing, those three dots there,

358
00:30:29.080 --> 00:30:38.680
Producing one capital good, three factors in another production process produce another capital good and so on.

359
00:30:38.680 --> 00:30:43.480
So you have four capital goods in the second stage, again they'd have to be combined with specific labor,

360
00:30:43.480 --> 00:30:49.480
these specific capital goods and then they would be combined and they would produce the two capital goods

361
00:30:49.480 --> 00:30:54.480
that you see emerging in stage one, that's the stage in which consumers goods are produced.

362
00:30:54.480 --> 00:31:00.480
Those two specific capital goods would be combined with labor and then the final consumer good would emerge, okay?

363
00:31:00.480 --> 00:31:05.280
Every process would be like that, that process.

364
00:31:05.280 --> 00:31:18.780
So what Rothbard does then is to assume, analyze this under a world of what we might call joint ownership of the factors of production, okay?

365
00:31:18.780 --> 00:31:28.780
In the case of joint ownership, all the specific factors in a particular production process receive the income.

366
00:31:28.780 --> 00:31:38.780
So let's say there's one production process in which two types of labor, two types of land and three types of capital goods are combined.

367
00:31:38.780 --> 00:31:48.780
And what if the capital that they produce is purchased for 80 ounces of gold, he uses gold in his example.

368
00:31:48.780 --> 00:31:53.780
Is there any way of determining how much each factor gets?

369
00:31:53.780 --> 00:31:55.780
No, it's a lump sum payment.

370
00:31:55.780 --> 00:32:02.780
There's no way of determining their relative contributions in value terms to the output of that product.

371
00:32:02.780 --> 00:32:04.780
And therefore, there has to be a system of bargaining.

372
00:32:04.780 --> 00:32:11.780
The key thing in this world has to do with costs.

373
00:32:11.780 --> 00:32:22.780
Now, what are the costs involved in production in a world of specific factors?

374
00:32:22.780 --> 00:32:29.780
This is where the mental construct shows its usefulness.

375
00:32:29.780 --> 00:32:35.780
Okay, first of all, the costs are subjective, cannot be determined by outside observers.

376
00:32:35.780 --> 00:32:42.780
Let's get to land and capital. Land and capital, to say specific, have absolutely no cost.

377
00:32:42.780 --> 00:32:45.780
Okay, there's no cost of using land and capital.

378
00:32:45.780 --> 00:32:50.780
They can be used in that particular process and nowhere else.

379
00:32:50.780 --> 00:32:52.780
So there's no opportunity cost.

380
00:32:52.780 --> 00:32:59.780
But also, there's no cost, sort of disutility cost, as we'll see if there is a labor, okay?

381
00:32:59.780 --> 00:33:07.780
The final product, once it has been produced, has no cost.

382
00:33:07.780 --> 00:33:11.780
There's a decision to sell the final product, has no cost.

383
00:33:11.780 --> 00:33:15.780
We're assuming that there's no use value for the final product, it's only an exchange value.

384
00:33:15.780 --> 00:33:19.780
There is a cost to labor, okay, that's the only cost in this world.

385
00:33:19.780 --> 00:33:26.780
We call it the cost of this world, and that cost is the utility of leisure foregone.

386
00:33:26.780 --> 00:33:32.780
We call it the disutility of labor.

387
00:33:32.780 --> 00:33:37.780
How then is the price of the product that emerges determined?

388
00:33:37.780 --> 00:33:40.780
Well, it's determined not by the costs.

389
00:33:40.780 --> 00:33:43.780
The costs determine the extent that they affect labor.

390
00:33:43.780 --> 00:33:46.780
If people have greater leisure preferences, what we're going to find is in this specific world,

391
00:33:46.780 --> 00:33:49.780
So, you're going to have fewer goods forthcoming, fewer consumer goods.

392
00:33:49.780 --> 00:33:57.780
If people's leisure preferences fall relative to earning an income, earning a money income,

393
00:33:57.780 --> 00:33:59.780
then it's going to be more produced.

394
00:33:59.780 --> 00:34:04.780
So, the cost is only going to affect the supply.

395
00:34:04.780 --> 00:34:11.780
And that was Jevin's point many years ago in 1871 when he wrote his theory of political economy.

396
00:34:11.780 --> 00:34:15.780
That costs only have any influence on price through supply.

397
00:34:15.780 --> 00:34:18.020
So you're going to have a supply merge, you're going to have people's value scales,

398
00:34:18.020 --> 00:34:20.060
there are still consumers in this world obviously,

399
00:34:20.060 --> 00:34:24.900
the people that earn income, these various joint factor owners,

400
00:34:24.900 --> 00:34:28.420
they'll then determine the prices, okay?

401
00:34:28.420 --> 00:34:35.300
The prices then are what is received in income by the joint owners of the factors of production.

402
00:34:35.300 --> 00:34:39.980
So that the costs are then determined by the prices, okay?

403
00:34:39.980 --> 00:34:46.620
You can see that very starkly in a world where there are no nonspecific factors,

404
00:34:46.620 --> 00:34:52.820
that the costs are imputed back from the prices onto the factors.

405
00:34:52.820 --> 00:34:54.020
Because what are costs?

406
00:34:54.020 --> 00:34:59.860
They're nothing but the sum that must be paid to produce a particular good.

407
00:34:59.860 --> 00:35:06.260
So in the first stage, the owners, the joint owners of the consumer good,

408
00:35:06.260 --> 00:35:15.260
If you could get a certain amount of gold, they then take some for themselves in their labor capacities,

409
00:35:15.260 --> 00:35:19.260
and then they must also spend some on capital goods.

410
00:35:19.260 --> 00:35:27.260
There's one other cost in this world, and that is the fact that laborers do have an opportunity cost besides leisure,

411
00:35:27.260 --> 00:35:34.260
and that is producing in shorter or longer processes of production.

412
00:35:34.260 --> 00:35:41.260
In other words, they can produce more goods for a higher income if they produce in a longer process of production,

413
00:35:41.260 --> 00:35:51.260
or they could produce a smaller quantity of goods, which will earn them a lower income if they all agree to engage in a shorter process of production,

414
00:35:51.260 --> 00:35:58.260
if they all go fishing with fishing poles rather than first producing a net and then fishing.

415
00:35:58.260 --> 00:36:03.260
So there is a time, time preference is a cost also in this world.

416
00:36:03.260 --> 00:36:06.060
So, time preference is part of this world.

417
00:36:06.060 --> 00:36:08.860
Okay, then Rockwell, and I'm just going to sum that up,

418
00:36:08.860 --> 00:36:19.460
basically analyzes the same world now with people who hire the factors of production,

419
00:36:19.460 --> 00:36:22.260
hire all the factors, they're called the capitalists,

420
00:36:22.260 --> 00:36:26.960
and then receive the income and pay the workers from that income.

421
00:36:26.960 --> 00:36:30.560
The final section I want to quickly go through in about two or three minutes.

422
00:36:30.560 --> 00:36:35.480
That's the section that deals with money, cost, prices, and Alfred Marshall.

423
00:36:35.480 --> 00:36:43.440
As Rothbard points out, the payments to the factors, okay, it's so starkly clear here in this chapter, are the money costs.

424
00:36:43.440 --> 00:36:47.160
So the costs themselves do not determine prices.

425
00:36:47.160 --> 00:36:54.240
Everything runs up from the consumer goods, up through the various factors.

426
00:36:54.240 --> 00:36:59.960
And it is true, in the evenly rotating economy, he brings this in, in this world,

427
00:36:59.960 --> 00:37:05.840
The total money spent on any particular good would be equal to the total money cost of that good.

428
00:37:05.840 --> 00:37:15.720
So the Marshallian economists, who claim that costs have an independent influence on supply,

429
00:37:15.720 --> 00:37:25.880
claim that it's really the money costs that determine the prices,

430
00:37:25.880 --> 00:37:35.380
or have an equal influence as the blades of a scissor in supply and demand in determining the prices, okay?

431
00:37:35.380 --> 00:37:38.880
So, Rothbard points out that the confusion stems from this.

432
00:37:38.880 --> 00:37:44.680
When you reason in the ERE and you don't realize it's only a mental construct,

433
00:37:44.680 --> 00:37:52.280
the equality between money costs, the average cost or the per unit cost and the price of the good

434
00:37:52.280 --> 00:37:56.780
or alternatively, the total revenue earned and the total cost,

435
00:37:56.780 --> 00:38:03.300
that equality makes it easy to confuse the causal relationships.

436
00:38:03.300 --> 00:38:10.540
That is, it may appear as if the cost is determining the price, what in fact it's not.

437
00:38:10.540 --> 00:38:20.400
So, the combination of the ERE and the world of joint factors makes it completely clear that prices,

438
00:38:20.400 --> 00:38:25.360
which are determined by consumer valuations in conjunction with existing stocks

439
00:38:25.360 --> 00:38:30.400
are what determines the costs.

440
00:38:30.400 --> 00:38:36.000
The costs are nothing but payments to the factors of production.

441
00:38:36.000 --> 00:38:43.800
One last point I wanted to make was that Marshall thought that the Austrians were right in the immediate run or the short run,

442
00:38:43.800 --> 00:38:47.600
that utility sort of dominated, but that in the long run,

443
00:38:47.600 --> 00:38:51.440
which he saw as the difference between the waves in the ocean,

444
00:38:51.440 --> 00:38:55.760
the waves in the ocean being the changes in prices going on from day to day,

445
00:38:55.760 --> 00:39:04.320
and the level of the ocean being the long run level of the final price, okay?

446
00:39:04.320 --> 00:39:09.720
Marshall claimed that the final price was the real price in some sense,

447
00:39:09.720 --> 00:39:13.640
the underlying price, the price to which everything returned, okay?

448
00:39:13.640 --> 00:39:20.600
and that therefore, that price, since it was equal to cost, was a determining factor.

449
00:39:20.600 --> 00:39:34.160
Whereas the Austrians see that that price is nothing but a fictional endpoint that can never be reached,

450
00:39:34.160 --> 00:39:37.400
because of changes intervening every day.

451
00:39:37.400 --> 00:39:54.400
Well, to put this up, it's a state of affairs that is at best decades away, if it ever even really can be reached, okay, from the, let me just get a wide shot on this, okay.

452
00:39:54.400 --> 00:40:05.160
That's up here. These are the real prices. These are the actual prices. These are what determine economic activity. These are what entrepreneurs use for calculation.

453
00:40:05.160 --> 00:40:10.120
These prices are what drive their actions, both existing and expected prices.

454
00:40:10.120 --> 00:40:13.520
The prices that emerge up here have nothing to do with the entrepreneurs.

455
00:40:13.520 --> 00:40:16.200
They don't care about them. They don't think about them.

456
00:40:16.200 --> 00:40:22.360
The economist, they're a figment of the economist's imagination, which is a useful figment.

457
00:40:22.360 --> 00:40:24.520
I'll stop there and take questions.

458
00:40:24.520 --> 00:40:29.400
And actually, there were some good questions that came in, too, on this chapter,

459
00:40:29.400 --> 00:40:34.080
which I hope I have addressed, especially the usefulness of fictions,

460
00:40:34.080 --> 00:40:37.280
even fictions that are logically contradictory and can't exist like the ERE.