WEBVTT

NOTE Triangular Intervention

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.440
I wanted to clear up a few things that have come up in the conference so far.

2
00:00:05.440 --> 00:00:14.560
When Dr. Salerno was talking about fear of deflation or deflation phobia,

3
00:00:14.560 --> 00:00:19.400
he mentioned that I had coined this term.

4
00:00:19.400 --> 00:00:24.520
That's supposed to be an A there, but it's more authentic.

5
00:00:24.520 --> 00:00:29.280
In order to coin a fear, an official psychological fear,

6
00:00:29.280 --> 00:00:40.080
I learned that you use the name of whatever the person is afraid of in Greek, and then you add phobia.

7
00:00:40.080 --> 00:00:48.680
And so I knew this person who had helped me out in the past, who was a Greek translator, an academic, and so forth,

8
00:00:48.680 --> 00:00:57.280
and he had helped me out in the past, and so I emailed him and asked him to give me the translation for deflation phobia.

9
00:00:57.280 --> 00:01:01.280
A couple of days later, I figured, you know, you could get it right off the tip of your tongue,

10
00:01:01.280 --> 00:01:05.780
but it turns out there's really not a word in Greek for deflation.

11
00:01:05.780 --> 00:01:13.380
Apparently, in the Greek society, they either had stable money or inflation.

12
00:01:13.380 --> 00:01:17.980
And he sends me back this, apoplit horosmos phobia.

13
00:01:17.980 --> 00:01:20.180
And so I tried to start breaking that down.

14
00:01:20.180 --> 00:01:22.980
Obviously, phobia is the fear of.

15
00:01:22.980 --> 00:01:29.380
And so I figured it was a pop in the price level.

16
00:01:29.380 --> 00:01:43.060
And so I sent him back my sort of retranslation and he said, no, that's not quite it.

17
00:01:43.060 --> 00:01:50.820
There was no term for deflation, so he had to sort of make something up, which didn't mean anything.

18
00:01:50.820 --> 00:01:55.820
So he wrote me back and said, no, it really means this, which was just a series of Greek symbols,

19
00:01:55.820 --> 00:01:59.820
which again didn't help me very much.

20
00:01:59.820 --> 00:02:02.820
And this guy had been helpful in the past.

21
00:02:02.820 --> 00:02:08.820
A friend of mine who is Greek had put me onto him a number of years before,

22
00:02:08.820 --> 00:02:13.820
when I had sort of been pushed into politics, into running for office.

23
00:02:13.820 --> 00:02:19.820
And I was a little intimidated by that being a Yankee New Yorker coming down to Alabama

24
00:02:19.820 --> 00:02:25.040
in Alabama and being sort of pushed into the political realm and so I've been

25
00:02:25.040 --> 00:02:31.120
asking my friends for advice and my Greek friend recommended I contact his

26
00:02:31.120 --> 00:02:36.140
cousin, the Greek translator, to get to the very basics of what politics was and

27
00:02:36.140 --> 00:02:46.880
so I asked him to to translate that for me and this time he came back and he

28
00:02:46.880 --> 00:02:55.880
He said, well, you know what, in Greek, what poly means, it means many or several, and I said, yeah, polynumerals and all that kind of stuff.

29
00:02:55.880 --> 00:02:58.880
He says, you know what ticks are, and I said, well, I don't know what that means.

30
00:02:58.880 --> 00:03:03.880
He said, well, they're a bunch of infectious, blood-sucking parasites.

31
00:03:03.880 --> 00:03:15.880
And so politics at that point became very clear to me.

32
00:03:15.880 --> 00:03:45.880
Another thing I wanted to clear up my really brilliant point that I was going to make the other day doesn't seem quite as momentous as at this point but it was on Nick's good question about the lack of development in Africa where you know it's put forward that there was just an absence of capital rather than the rule of law as Nick pointed out and I'm sure Murray would would agree with him at that point

33
00:03:45.880 --> 00:03:51.640
on that point, but you have to remember, and this is again a good lesson about

34
00:03:51.640 --> 00:03:55.880
Man Economy and State and how it's actually structured.

35
00:03:55.880 --> 00:04:00.600
First of all, there's lots of reasons, possible reasons for the lack of capital,

36
00:04:00.600 --> 00:04:07.160
including the rule of law, but there's also simply that people don't have a preference

37
00:04:07.160 --> 00:04:12.120
for putting, for savings and building up capital.

38
00:04:12.120 --> 00:04:27.120
They might have a particular ideological bias against accumulating capital and they prefer to live, you know, in thatch huts and very little clothing.

39
00:04:27.120 --> 00:04:40.420
You can think of the survivor, you know, TV shows, people like that, or just some sort of religious bias against accumulating capital, such as we might find in Tibet.

40
00:04:40.420 --> 00:04:49.820
So there are lots of natural reasons for the absence of capital, but of course at this part in Man Economy and State,

41
00:04:49.820 --> 00:05:00.940
Rothbard is assuming that we have a free society with the rule of law, based on libertarian property rights based systems,

42
00:05:00.940 --> 00:05:10.380
so that he naturally wouldn't bring into focus the absence of the rule of law at that particular point.

43
00:05:10.380 --> 00:05:19.020
Okay, with respect to triangular intervention, Rothbard first of course lays out autistic

44
00:05:19.020 --> 00:05:25.220
intervention where the state is coming to you as an individual and intervening in your

45
00:05:25.220 --> 00:05:32.820
lives in some way, and then what is to follow this lecture on binary intervention where

46
00:05:32.820 --> 00:05:41.820
where the state again intervenes in your life in the form of taking away your property,

47
00:05:41.820 --> 00:05:46.540
taxing you, requiring that you provide the state with certain gifts.

48
00:05:46.540 --> 00:05:53.360
And then there's triangular intervention where the state intervenes between transactions

49
00:05:53.360 --> 00:05:59.720
and exchanges between various individuals and business forms out there in the economy.

50
00:05:59.720 --> 00:06:05.360
So that's going to be the focus of this lecture.

51
00:06:05.360 --> 00:06:11.960
One of the questions that was raised with respect to this chapter was, you know, what

52
00:06:11.960 --> 00:06:18.120
is Rothbard's contributions here, because a lot of the actual interventions that he

53
00:06:18.120 --> 00:06:26.380
goes over are familiar to some economists, or some of them are familiar to many economists.

54
00:06:26.380 --> 00:06:33.060
But the overall basic topology of interventions that Rothbard provides in Man Economy and

55
00:06:33.060 --> 00:06:35.820
State is a contribution.

56
00:06:35.820 --> 00:06:42.300
It's a contribution that he lays out the whole extent, not comprehensive, but gives

57
00:06:42.300 --> 00:06:50.960
you the full extent of the types of government interventions that do exist and then breaks

58
00:06:50.960 --> 00:06:52.540
them down into categories.

59
00:06:52.540 --> 00:07:03.660
So that's a contribution and also it gives you a good flavor for single triangular interventions

60
00:07:03.660 --> 00:07:08.300
and then when you look at the whole broad base of triangular interventions it gives

61
00:07:08.300 --> 00:07:15.300
you an understanding of how chaotic a market economy can become when you have each and

62
00:07:15.300 --> 00:07:20.820
every one of these interventions as well as many others.

63
00:07:20.820 --> 00:07:28.700
And then, of course, as Walter pointed out, it also gives you, looking back, it gives

64
00:07:28.700 --> 00:07:32.540
you a good picture of what the free society really is.

65
00:07:32.540 --> 00:07:37.560
Because in the absence of all these interventions, including things like defense, you get a good

66
00:07:37.560 --> 00:07:39.600
picture of what society is.

67
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:46.220
So he is laying out an understanding of society to begin with in Man Economy and State, and

68
00:07:46.220 --> 00:07:53.380
and then bringing in all of these interventions and of course what he's pointing out is that

69
00:07:53.380 --> 00:08:02.380
these interventions reduce social welfare. They cannot increase social welfare, they

70
00:08:02.380 --> 00:08:12.740
only decrease it. Triangular intervention is what most economists think of when they

71
00:08:12.740 --> 00:08:17.740
when I think of intervention, regulations, price controls, things of that nature.

72
00:08:17.740 --> 00:08:26.740
And so these are a lot of the most common types of interventions that we see in the real world.

73
00:08:26.740 --> 00:08:34.740
With respect to autistic and binary, autistic and binary types of interventions, people generally understand.

74
00:08:34.740 --> 00:08:36.740
They see them and they understand them.

75
00:08:36.740 --> 00:08:45.580
You know, if you were forced to salute to the flag or you're forced to salute to the ruler or to the fuhrer,

76
00:08:45.580 --> 00:08:49.380
you know, you would have a good idea of how that made you feel personally.

77
00:08:49.380 --> 00:08:55.220
If you are forced to pay taxes or somebody repossesses your home because you failed to pay taxes,

78
00:08:55.220 --> 00:08:59.700
you get a pretty good idea of how that impacts you.

79
00:08:59.700 --> 00:09:05.660
But triangular intervention is where there's a veil of ignorance,

80
00:09:05.660 --> 00:09:16.300
where we don't really see and feel the impact of intervention in our daily lives.

81
00:09:16.300 --> 00:09:23.420
And so this is the area where economists can be most enlightening to the general public.

82
00:09:23.420 --> 00:09:29.460
It's only people who can see the unseen, in other words, that actually can enlighten their

83
00:09:29.460 --> 00:09:36.360
and their fellow citizens with respect to what is the impact of this price control or

84
00:09:36.360 --> 00:09:42.020
conversely what is causing a shortage of a particular good or service or what is causing

85
00:09:42.020 --> 00:09:47.580
the price of a particular product going up.

86
00:09:47.580 --> 00:09:48.580
Where are those causes?

87
00:09:48.580 --> 00:09:54.640
Well, the normal, average, ordinary, everyday, common person doesn't have any way of figuring

88
00:09:54.640 --> 00:10:01.640
to bring those things out and if you listen to the major media, they really don't have much of a clue either.

89
00:10:01.640 --> 00:10:09.640
It's up to each and every one of us to be able to provide that kind of insight to our fellow citizens.

90
00:10:09.640 --> 00:10:20.640
The first type of intervention is price controls, where you have, where the government sets either a minimum price,

91
00:10:20.640 --> 00:10:28.400
such as a minimum wage or a maximum price such as a usury law setting an

92
00:10:28.400 --> 00:10:36.060
upper limit on the interest rate and you can also have a fixed price of a

93
00:10:36.060 --> 00:10:41.960
particular good you can have the state coming in and fixing all prices across

94
00:10:41.960 --> 00:10:48.080
the board and so there's a variety of different types of price controls that

95
00:10:48.080 --> 00:11:10.480
that the state imposes. Rothbard focuses on effective price controls, those where the price setting, minimums, maximums, or fixed prices are at odds with reality, with economic reality, and these cause distortions in the economy,

96
00:11:10.480 --> 00:11:19.200
surpluses and shortages, they cause businesses to lose money, entrepreneurs to lose money,

97
00:11:19.200 --> 00:11:24.120
and they lower welfare in the economy.

98
00:11:24.120 --> 00:11:31.480
And of course, there's the general price control, which we see imposed by states in highly inflationary

99
00:11:31.480 --> 00:11:40.080
economies and hyperinflationary economies with the idea to prevent inflation from impacting

100
00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:46.520
economic performance and to prop up the purchasing power of money.

101
00:11:46.520 --> 00:11:52.800
Of course this, the general price control actually causes a lot more chaos, a lot more

102
00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:58.520
distortions and losses in the economy.

103
00:11:58.520 --> 00:12:07.000
Money seems to lose an anchor to value, businesses lose money and entrepreneurs have a very difficult

104
00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:19.000
One interesting thing that Rothbard does here with respect to price controls is that he brings in price controls on money.

105
00:12:19.000 --> 00:12:30.000
So where normally you would find things like Gresham's Law, legal tender laws, and chapters on monetary economics and monetary policy,

106
00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:39.720
Policy, Rothbard introduces them here in terms of price controls, so that he explains bimetalism

107
00:12:39.720 --> 00:12:49.240
in Gresham's law where good money supposedly drives out bad money by categorizing bimetalism

108
00:12:49.240 --> 00:12:58.540
where the state fixes the ratio of gold to silver as a form of price control.

109
00:12:58.540 --> 00:13:06.320
Legal tender laws have a lot of different effects, but Rothbard focuses in on the impact

110
00:13:06.320 --> 00:13:15.420
of legal tender laws on brand new coins versus worn out coins.

111
00:13:15.420 --> 00:13:21.860
And finally, usury laws, which are often looked at in terms of price controls, where the state

112
00:13:21.860 --> 00:13:31.040
imposes maximum interest rates in order to keep rates low, of course this prevents loans,

113
00:13:31.040 --> 00:13:39.260
it prevents discourages savings and investment and ultimately leads to extra market activity

114
00:13:39.260 --> 00:13:47.620
such as loan sharking, where individuals work outside of the normal market channels, they

115
00:13:47.620 --> 00:13:54.580
They charge extremely high rates of interest because the normal rules of law in the marketplace

116
00:13:54.580 --> 00:14:01.860
aren't in place with illegal activity, it introduces yet another form of violence.

117
00:14:01.860 --> 00:14:06.460
So the violence of the state coming in and imposing its rule with respect to interest

118
00:14:06.460 --> 00:14:17.180
rates also can result in violence from market participants rather than from the state itself.

119
00:14:17.180 --> 00:14:22.780
So with respect to price controls, you have a situation where some people in the economy

120
00:14:22.780 --> 00:14:36.820
are harmed and where very often some people can benefit.

121
00:14:36.820 --> 00:14:46.580
Others are surprisingly harmed, so people who expect to benefit from certain price controls,

122
00:14:46.580 --> 00:14:51.180
Say, for example, low-income people, there's a price control on milk.

123
00:14:51.180 --> 00:14:58.360
Milk is in short supply, and the result being that people don't have access to milk at all.

124
00:14:58.360 --> 00:15:03.460
So rather than helping them, it unintentionally or surprisingly hurts them.

125
00:15:03.460 --> 00:15:09.460
Of course, there's all sorts of distortions caused by price controls, and this also leads

126
00:15:09.460 --> 00:15:13.620
to taxes and bureaucracy as well.

127
00:15:13.620 --> 00:15:29.600
So that also is going to fit in with the binary intervention, excuse me.

128
00:15:29.600 --> 00:15:36.860
And also it's important to note that price controls can have effects on the product,

129
00:15:36.860 --> 00:15:41.760
and product controls, which we're going to look at next, obviously can have impacts

130
00:15:41.760 --> 00:16:11.760
The first kind of product control is prohibition. Here both the suppliers and the demanders are hurt by the prohibition, whereas in price controls you can have nominal winners either on the supply side or the demand side. With prohibition, you basically have all parties in the market harmed as a result of prohibition. The only people that are benefited are the bureaucrats and the interest groups.

131
00:16:11.760 --> 00:16:15.240
groups that want to promote certain types of prohibition.

132
00:16:15.240 --> 00:16:24.640
So an alcohol prohibition, for example, will help establish and fund an alcohol bureaucracy,

133
00:16:24.640 --> 00:16:31.400
but it will also help politicians who are conveying favors to people who believe in

134
00:16:31.400 --> 00:16:35.160
alcohol temperance and not drinking alcohol.

135
00:16:35.160 --> 00:16:42.200
Of course, prohibition, it's the most important impact is in creating a black market where

136
00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:47.800
there are more risks, there are higher prices and a lot of inefficiency.

137
00:16:47.800 --> 00:16:54.160
And then Rothbard goes through and looks at all of the other impacts that prohibition

138
00:16:54.160 --> 00:16:56.040
brings about.

139
00:16:56.040 --> 00:17:01.440
It distorts the type of firm, it distorts and detracts the type of information that's

140
00:17:01.440 --> 00:17:11.940
available to consumers. In fact, prohibition is an interesting contrast between neoclassical

141
00:17:11.940 --> 00:17:17.940
economists and Austrian economists. Neoclassical economists are generally what they call price

142
00:17:17.940 --> 00:17:23.720
theorists, so that everything they do with respect to modeling and markets and supply

143
00:17:23.720 --> 00:17:28.720
and Supply and Demand has to do with the price of the product.

144
00:17:30.720 --> 00:17:39.720
Austrians have a more general view of how government intervention affects marketplaces, businesses and consumers.

145
00:17:40.720 --> 00:17:47.720
And when we look at prohibition, where you have the state imposing its will and enforcing it with criminal penalties,

146
00:17:47.720 --> 00:18:02.720
What we find is that the changes in the market that result from a prohibition, the price changes are actually the least important in the overall scope of things.

147
00:18:02.720 --> 00:18:09.720
So when neoclassicals look at the problem of prohibition, they try to model it in terms of price.

148
00:18:09.720 --> 00:18:17.720
It raises the price for them, it decreases the quantity, and so therefore it in some sense achieves its desired result.

149
00:18:17.720 --> 00:18:22.720
It doesn't achieve complete prohibition, but at least it reduces consumption.

150
00:18:22.720 --> 00:18:29.720
Now the Austrians are going to look at that and say, well, you know, look at what other changes are happening.

151
00:18:29.720 --> 00:18:34.720
The product is produced in an entirely different way.

152
00:18:34.720 --> 00:18:40.720
It's transported under completely different conditions.

153
00:18:40.720 --> 00:18:43.720
It's sold under completely different conditions.

154
00:18:43.720 --> 00:18:47.720
And it's consumed under completely different conditions.

155
00:18:47.720 --> 00:18:52.720
People don't have access to the rule of law.

156
00:18:52.720 --> 00:18:57.720
People aren't protected by laws against fraud.

157
00:18:57.720 --> 00:19:03.720
They aren't protected by the normal channels of competition.

158
00:19:03.720 --> 00:19:14.720
One of the things that I've shown is that prohibition results in much higher potent drugs being sold into the marketplace.

159
00:19:14.720 --> 00:19:24.720
So that the neoclassicals can say, well, we've decreased the quantity of drugs sold by prohibition.

160
00:19:24.720 --> 00:19:34.720
The problem is, is that the quantity that's been sold is many times more potent than that which would have been sold in the marketplace.

161
00:19:34.720 --> 00:19:47.360
So before prohibition, things like cocaine and heroin, morphine were relatively safe, and very few people died from those products.

162
00:19:47.360 --> 00:20:17.360
they very few people overdosed from those products because they were produced and distributed and consumed under market conditions but now we have a completely different situation where the products are being produced, they're being distributed and they're being consumed under completely different conditions and a lot of people die a lot of people experience overdoses and all of that is directly

163
00:20:17.360 --> 00:20:24.280
attributable to the prohibition itself. There was just a little news item on CNN on my way

164
00:20:24.280 --> 00:20:32.440
over here which showed that the potency of marijuana is higher now than it ever has been

165
00:20:32.440 --> 00:20:38.000
in the history of man, basically. And it's been consistently higher over the last 30

166
00:20:38.000 --> 00:20:45.880
years that the government has been testing the potency of marijuana, which might be some

167
00:20:45.880 --> 00:20:55.080
some kind of explanation for their behavior over recent years as well.

168
00:20:55.080 --> 00:21:03.220
Now there's a whole long list of different types of product controls that grant monopoly

169
00:21:03.220 --> 00:21:13.520
privileges in the economy and again Rothbard shows here that consumers and would-be or

170
00:21:13.520 --> 00:21:18.720
where potential producers are harmed as a result of these product controls and that

171
00:21:18.720 --> 00:21:25.360
very often these product controls and grants of monopoly privilege result in higher prices

172
00:21:25.360 --> 00:21:33.240
for consumers and he also points out, which is very important, that many of these monopoly

173
00:21:33.240 --> 00:21:42.900
privileges are sugar-coated with grants of appearing to serve the public interest in

174
00:21:42.900 --> 00:21:48.220
in order to make them more palatable to consumers, and again, these are areas where it's very

175
00:21:48.220 --> 00:21:53.840
difficult for consumers to understand what's happening to them, especially given this sugar

176
00:21:53.840 --> 00:22:02.740
coating that the monopoly privileges are meant to improve the public image.

177
00:22:02.740 --> 00:22:09.300
He starts out with compulsory cartels.

178
00:22:09.300 --> 00:22:12.140
Next is licenses and certificates of needs.

179
00:22:12.140 --> 00:22:19.740
Of course, there's many, many different professions such as doctors who are given licenses.

180
00:22:19.740 --> 00:22:24.620
Certificates of needs apply to things like establishing new hospitals, new nursing homes,

181
00:22:24.620 --> 00:22:26.460
things of that nature.

182
00:22:26.460 --> 00:22:31.700
These all serve to increase the price of the product.

183
00:22:31.700 --> 00:22:39.380
Standards of Quality, this obviously is cloaked in the public interest.

184
00:22:39.380 --> 00:22:44.460
The medical profession is important with this regard.

185
00:22:44.460 --> 00:22:52.060
The imposition of product definitions and ingredient labeling are all done to establish

186
00:22:52.060 --> 00:22:57.940
so-called standards of quality.

187
00:22:57.940 --> 00:23:05.460
including one that just came about recently where the government required food products

188
00:23:05.460 --> 00:23:18.980
to label the amount of a certain type of fat, trans fats, well it turns out that at the

189
00:23:18.980 --> 00:23:26.820
same time they required anybody who had trans fats in their food to label it, they also

190
00:23:26.820 --> 00:23:35.620
also allowed producers to include up to one gram per serving of trans fats and declare

191
00:23:35.620 --> 00:23:45.040
that there was no trans fats in the food, while at the same time allowing the producers

192
00:23:45.040 --> 00:23:53.480
to change the amount that fit with a unit of consumption.

193
00:23:53.480 --> 00:23:58.960
So a product will, you know, a bag of potato chips will say this has four servings of potato

194
00:23:58.960 --> 00:24:04.120
chips and it's, you know, so many chips and so many calories and all that.

195
00:24:04.120 --> 00:24:11.320
They allowed them to change that so that producers would reduce the amount in a serving, increase

196
00:24:11.320 --> 00:24:17.720
the number of servings so that on the product labeling the calories per serving went down

197
00:24:17.720 --> 00:24:25.840
and the amount of trans fats would fall below the one gram per serving.

198
00:24:25.840 --> 00:24:31.720
So instead of sending out the message that we're going to get tough on trans fats, what

199
00:24:31.720 --> 00:24:37.880
they effectively did was give a avenue for producers, and I'm all for trans fats, by

200
00:24:37.880 --> 00:24:45.160
the way, I'm not, you know, being anti-trans fat here, to declare on their product that

201
00:24:45.160 --> 00:24:47.640
This product is trans-fat free.

202
00:24:47.640 --> 00:24:52.200
So you've seen a plethora of these new labeling techniques

203
00:24:52.200 --> 00:24:55.440
when in fact, the product is the same old thing

204
00:24:55.440 --> 00:24:58.160
that it's always been, the labeling has been changed.

205
00:24:58.160 --> 00:25:01.760
And so, you know, this is not a fraud,

206
00:25:01.760 --> 00:25:06.220
it's just a way in which industry has captured the state

207
00:25:06.220 --> 00:25:09.320
to its own advantage in order to hurt consumers.

208
00:25:09.320 --> 00:25:18.760
And, of course, so much for building construction regulations with the construction towers in

209
00:25:18.760 --> 00:25:23.960
New York, you know, falling on a regular basis and killing people, as Walter would point

210
00:25:23.960 --> 00:25:32.420
out, you know, that type of activity is severely restricted in a true free market economy.

211
00:25:32.420 --> 00:25:39.900
Because these construction companies have complied with regulations and inspections,

212
00:25:39.900 --> 00:25:44.900
they're able to get off with lower penalties.

213
00:25:44.900 --> 00:25:50.180
Tariffs obviously is an important one where it's a battle basically between mercantilist

214
00:25:50.180 --> 00:25:54.680
arguments and free market arguments.

215
00:25:54.680 --> 00:26:02.300
Immigration restrictions, Rothbard shows how the free society works in terms of immigration

216
00:26:02.300 --> 00:26:12.740
and Wage Rate Compensation Differentials, where capital moves from high wage to low wage countries

217
00:26:12.740 --> 00:26:21.100
and where low wage workers move to high wage countries or high capital countries, which

218
00:26:21.100 --> 00:26:28.020
basically, if we didn't have the national borders and have the distortions that we currently

219
00:26:28.020 --> 00:26:34.500
have, things like population problems, labor shortages, and the like, would not emerge

220
00:26:34.500 --> 00:26:47.860
at all. Child labor laws cause unemployment, less production. Conscription is another big

221
00:26:47.860 --> 00:26:54.500
one, especially at the time that Rothbard was writing this, during the Vietnam or pre-Vietnam

222
00:26:54.500 --> 00:27:05.180
era, post-World War II, the minimum wage law is a good example where the minimum wage

223
00:27:05.180 --> 00:27:11.480
law actually hurts those that it is designed to help, subsidies to unemployment, penalties

224
00:27:11.480 --> 00:27:13.700
to market forms.

225
00:27:13.700 --> 00:27:22.380
That was a bigger issue in the 1950s and the 1960s than it is today, but we still see things

226
00:27:22.380 --> 00:27:43.380
State of Maryland passed a law with regard to how firms would handle health insurance for the employees and it turned out that that law only applied to one Super Walmart in the state of Maryland.

227
00:27:43.380 --> 00:27:52.160
Anti-trust laws fit into this, again, where it's seemingly designed to help competition,

228
00:27:52.160 --> 00:27:59.280
it actually hurts competition.

229
00:27:59.280 --> 00:28:05.080
Conservation laws, Murray goes into great depth with conservation laws, of course we

230
00:28:05.080 --> 00:28:09.180
refer to them as environmental laws today.

231
00:28:09.180 --> 00:28:22.760
The greatest pie in the sky type of legislation that is in the market today.

232
00:28:22.760 --> 00:28:28.700
Environmental laws or conservation laws, Rothbard shows, is a misuse of resources in an economic

233
00:28:28.700 --> 00:28:30.700
sense.

234
00:28:30.700 --> 00:28:38.380
He shows that owners of private property create the maximum present value of their resources

235
00:28:38.380 --> 00:28:43.380
is an earn the best place to conserve those resources.

236
00:28:44.060 --> 00:28:46.740
And one thing that I find very enlightening

237
00:28:46.740 --> 00:28:49.540
in terms of teaching classes about conservation

238
00:28:49.540 --> 00:28:52.540
or environmental laws is to ask students

239
00:28:52.540 --> 00:28:56.100
the difference between renewable resources

240
00:28:56.100 --> 00:28:58.700
and non-renewable resources.

241
00:28:58.700 --> 00:29:02.180
In other words, resources which the world has the ability

242
00:29:02.180 --> 00:29:04.900
to produce over and over, we can change,

243
00:29:04.900 --> 00:29:07.740
we can get less of them, we can get more of them,

244
00:29:07.740 --> 00:29:17.180
But all we have to do is continue the production process of providing enough ground or enough food or enough air or whatever

245
00:29:17.180 --> 00:29:23.540
and we'll be able to constantly reproduce those particular resources forever.

246
00:29:23.540 --> 00:29:30.620
And then there's the non-renewable resources where there's a fixed finite amount of those particular products on Earth

247
00:29:30.620 --> 00:29:35.460
and once we use them up, they're going to be gone forever.

248
00:29:35.460 --> 00:29:46.260
And then I asked the students, which one of these sets of resources, the renewable or the non-renewable, do we face the most problem with?

249
00:29:46.260 --> 00:29:52.980
And they inevitably pick the non-renewable resources, those which are finite, they're fixed.

250
00:29:52.980 --> 00:29:55.900
If we use them up, it's all gone.

251
00:29:55.900 --> 00:29:59.020
But the renewable ones, we shouldn't have much problem with.

252
00:29:59.020 --> 00:30:10.020
But in fact, it's the renewable resources which we're having the most problems with according to the environmentalist groups themselves.

253
00:30:10.020 --> 00:30:18.020
A particular plant species, particular animal species, particular fish species.

254
00:30:18.020 --> 00:30:26.020
Whereas things like gold, for example, doesn't look like we're having much of a problem with that.

255
00:30:26.020 --> 00:30:37.020
Even things like uranium, which has a sort of a shelf life to it, you know, that stuff is stored and then reprocessed into other products.

256
00:30:37.020 --> 00:30:50.020
And so we're actually having very little problems with these exhaustible resources and we're having all of the problems with the inexhaustible resources that are renewable.

257
00:30:50.020 --> 00:30:51.020
And why is that?

258
00:30:51.020 --> 00:30:58.660
Well, with the non-renewable resources, they tend to be in private hands.

259
00:30:58.660 --> 00:31:08.860
They tend to be owned by individuals, people who own land, people who own mines and mine resources.

260
00:31:08.860 --> 00:31:16.740
Whereas with the renewable resources, those are things that are not subject to property rights very often,

261
00:31:16.740 --> 00:31:22.660
or where the government actually gets in the way of establishing property rights like in

262
00:31:22.660 --> 00:31:27.580
the sea or in bodies of water.

263
00:31:27.580 --> 00:31:32.620
And so that's a great example of how the market with property rights actually takes

264
00:31:32.620 --> 00:31:38.340
very good care of resources whereas where the government either has gotten in the way

265
00:31:38.340 --> 00:31:45.900
of or has stymied the establishment of property rights.

266
00:31:45.900 --> 00:31:56.460
Now patents are an important invasion of property rights by the state.

267
00:31:56.460 --> 00:32:02.940
It's an invasion of the property rights of the would-be inventors, people who come along

268
00:32:02.940 --> 00:32:10.660
and discover, are the second discoverers of various techniques.

269
00:32:10.660 --> 00:32:17.980
I think the group basically understands a lot about the impact of patents, although I know

270
00:32:17.980 --> 00:32:19.740
there are questions about it.

271
00:32:19.740 --> 00:32:26.780
I want to give you a couple of personal experiences with inventions.

272
00:32:26.780 --> 00:32:34.660
I suffer from allergies, pollen allergies, and one weekend this spring I woke up and

273
00:32:34.660 --> 00:32:40.980
Now I thought I had this great idea that if I could only come up with a nose filter where

274
00:32:40.980 --> 00:32:45.700
I could stick it in my nose and have a, you know, one of those high quality filters put

275
00:32:45.700 --> 00:32:51.300
in there, that I could go outside instead of wearing one of those big Michael Jackson

276
00:32:51.300 --> 00:32:59.020
masks, which, you know, it makes people afraid of you. But, you know, just a little nose

277
00:32:59.020 --> 00:33:04.860
This plug, I figured, well, they'll just think I'm a geek.

278
00:33:04.860 --> 00:33:09.940
And so I designed this thing and got, you know, what I would need to have, you know,

279
00:33:09.940 --> 00:33:13.780
little plastic pieces and filters and so on.

280
00:33:13.780 --> 00:33:18.260
And I thought, well, the filters would have to be replaceable given that it's in your

281
00:33:18.260 --> 00:33:20.580
nose all the time.

282
00:33:20.580 --> 00:33:25.400
And so I laid all this out and then I went on the Internet to see if anybody else had

283
00:33:25.400 --> 00:33:26.400
discovered this.

284
00:33:26.400 --> 00:33:31.800
What is he trying to do? Why would he be coming up with this kind of invention?

285
00:33:31.800 --> 00:33:37.760
Well, it turns out that three other people already have patents on this, and then there's

286
00:33:37.760 --> 00:33:43.880
a couple more who have patents pending, but none of them are in the marketplace. Those

287
00:33:43.880 --> 00:33:50.660
people came up with this idea and they're just in the way, sort of, of other people

288
00:33:50.660 --> 00:33:55.840
trying to bring it to market, because if I brought it to market, they would sue to recoup

289
00:33:55.840 --> 00:34:12.840
And because there's multiple patents already existing, if anybody did try to bring it to market with permission, they probably have to get permission and give fees to all of the patent owners.

290
00:34:12.840 --> 00:34:23.960
I also came up with another invention, again, for the allergies, where I took a 3M filtrate

291
00:34:23.960 --> 00:34:30.880
filter. If you have an air conditioning unit in your home or in your apartment, there's

292
00:34:30.880 --> 00:34:36.400
a filter attached to it. And if you don't have one, I'll show it to you. They're all

293
00:34:36.400 --> 00:34:44.480
all around the institute, and so I took the 3M filter and duct taped it to a 20 inch box

294
00:34:44.480 --> 00:34:53.020
fan and then you just run the fan and it brings the air through and it takes all the pollen

295
00:34:53.020 --> 00:34:55.800
out of the air.

296
00:34:55.800 --> 00:35:01.560
And so not wanting to profit from this myself, I sent the idea to the 3M company who also

297
00:35:01.560 --> 00:35:07.560
also makes the masks and the filtrate filters, so that was the natural company to send it to.

298
00:35:07.560 --> 00:35:16.560
And sure enough, about 18 months later, they came out with a very fancy version of my Thornton Air machine.

299
00:35:16.560 --> 00:35:24.560
And I was kind of indignant that the first time I found out about this was when they sent me an advertisement

300
00:35:24.560 --> 00:35:32.000
to buy one of these things costing two hundred dollars and you know I was going

301
00:35:32.000 --> 00:35:35.240
to write this company and call them up and give them a piece of my mind but

302
00:35:35.240 --> 00:35:39.240
somebody said somebody told me they said if they had even sent you a letter of

303
00:35:39.240 --> 00:35:44.120
thanks that would have been evidence that I could have presented in a court

304
00:35:44.120 --> 00:35:51.560
lawsuit against them in order to you know make my patent claim on that

305
00:35:51.560 --> 00:36:02.920
and Product. So patents really affect, distort and reduce overall product research and in

306
00:36:02.920 --> 00:36:10.240
particular they prevent the bringing of that basic research, that primary introductory

307
00:36:10.240 --> 00:36:18.280
type research into the market in terms of products actually reaching the market. And

308
00:36:18.280 --> 00:36:25.760
There's a whole host of other such interventions that Rothbard covers, and that's another

309
00:36:25.760 --> 00:36:34.880
good benefit of power and market, or the final sections of Man Economy and State, is that

310
00:36:34.880 --> 00:36:40.160
you get a shorthand introduction to all of the really important aspects of the problem.

311
00:36:40.160 --> 00:36:44.000
You might not go into a lot of the details, but it'll say the consumers are hurt, would-be

312
00:36:44.000 --> 00:36:51.480
Producers are hurt, special interest groups are helped, and so there's government franchises

313
00:36:51.480 --> 00:36:57.280
like the post office and the state lottery, the problem of eminent domain, which really

314
00:36:57.280 --> 00:37:03.120
probably cries out for an Austrian treatment, sort of a law and economics dissertation or

315
00:37:03.120 --> 00:37:13.460
thesis on that subject, bribery, anti-monopoly policy, which of course Rothbard shows anti-monopoly

316
00:37:13.460 --> 00:37:21.220
Policy is actually helps create monopoly and restrictive prices.

317
00:37:21.220 --> 00:37:26.820
And then the appendix look at private coinage and coercion.

318
00:37:26.820 --> 00:37:31.700
Again some very interesting topics.

319
00:37:31.700 --> 00:37:36.740
And before opening it up I want to try to address or at least introduce some of the

320
00:37:36.740 --> 00:37:41.220
written questions here.

321
00:37:41.220 --> 00:37:47.340
By the way, when I started getting into Austrian economics, I had a couple of books.

322
00:37:47.340 --> 00:37:53.980
I know I had Kirzner's book on competition, but one of the first books I ever got was

323
00:37:53.980 --> 00:37:56.620
Power and Market.

324
00:37:56.620 --> 00:38:03.220
And that was one I most completely read and digested of the early books on Austrian economics,

325
00:38:03.220 --> 00:38:10.740
but I had no idea that there was this whole huge prelude of Man, Economy, and State for

326
00:38:10.740 --> 00:38:20.500
So I read, I had some economic courses, some introductory economic courses, but I was basically

327
00:38:20.500 --> 00:38:26.220
taking a lot of what Rothbard said either on tuition or faith, but it was a great eye-opener

328
00:38:26.220 --> 00:38:29.220
for me.

329
00:38:29.220 --> 00:38:34.320
I know that the classification of types of intervention and complex analysis is great

330
00:38:34.320 --> 00:38:42.200
and Rothbard, but just a short question, what is his original contribution in this area?

331
00:38:42.200 --> 00:38:52.200
Well, I think one is the topology itself, is laying out the system, the classifications,

332
00:38:52.200 --> 00:39:00.640
and giving you the full feel of the entire scope of intervention and the vast different

333
00:39:00.640 --> 00:39:04.200
and the varieties of intervention that the state makes in economy.

334
00:39:04.200 --> 00:39:09.840
So I'd say that was the primary contribution, but a lot of these specific interventions

335
00:39:09.840 --> 00:39:22.240
are not treated anywhere else in the literature as of the time that it was first published.

336
00:39:22.240 --> 00:39:26.840
Second question, I'm not convinced by Rothbard's argument that the major purpose of standard

337
00:39:26.840 --> 00:39:34.660
of Quality and Safety Regulations is to restrict competition and of course that's exactly

338
00:39:34.660 --> 00:39:41.920
what the state wants people to think and that's the specific aspect of quality and safety

339
00:39:41.920 --> 00:39:48.320
regulations that are most promoted by the state.

340
00:39:48.320 --> 00:39:54.840
But we should note that in the market economy that there are a lot of very reasonable and

341
00:39:54.840 --> 00:40:02.280
and in fact, more effective forms of safety and quality regulations.

342
00:40:02.280 --> 00:40:08.320
There's some specific ones like the certification process.

343
00:40:08.320 --> 00:40:14.580
Doctors need to be licensed, but other medical professions and other professions, other services

344
00:40:14.580 --> 00:40:16.840
can be certified.

345
00:40:16.840 --> 00:40:21.840
so that you're a certified whatever.

346
00:40:21.840 --> 00:40:28.920
And that just says that you've been specifically trained in a service, that you've met all

347
00:40:28.920 --> 00:40:36.440
the qualifications, you've had all the teaching, all the hands-on experience.

348
00:40:36.440 --> 00:40:42.920
And so that's a very legitimate alternative to the licensing process.

349
00:40:42.920 --> 00:40:51.760
And actually, licensing is somewhat suspect with respect to standards of quality.

350
00:40:51.760 --> 00:41:00.360
For example, in terms of beauticians and people who cut hair and that sort of thing, the actual

351
00:41:00.360 --> 00:41:06.720
requirements to get a license are not really heavily slated towards the cutting of hair

352
00:41:06.720 --> 00:41:08.240
and those sorts of things.

353
00:41:08.240 --> 00:41:13.960
are actually related to things that are not directly related to the business of cutting

354
00:41:13.960 --> 00:41:15.800
and styling hair.

355
00:41:15.800 --> 00:41:22.360
But they do form a barrier to entry because they keep people out of the profession.

356
00:41:22.360 --> 00:41:28.080
People for example who don't have a great proficiency with the English language won't

357
00:41:28.080 --> 00:41:30.040
pass the licensing test.

358
00:41:30.040 --> 00:41:37.800
There are various seals of approval, the good housekeeping seal of approval, the National

359
00:41:37.800 --> 00:41:45.660
National Association of Retired People, passed their seal of approval over a variety of products

360
00:41:45.660 --> 00:41:53.860
specifically designed for their members. There's groups like Underwriters Laboratory. You very

361
00:41:53.860 --> 00:42:01.200
often see electronic products in your apartments with a U and an L with a circle around it.

362
00:42:01.200 --> 00:42:09.120
That means that the electronic components of this product have been inspected and certified

363
00:42:09.120 --> 00:42:11.200
by the underwriters laboratory.

364
00:42:11.200 --> 00:42:17.080
And then, of course, there's a whole bunch of market competitive forces which keep businesses

365
00:42:17.080 --> 00:42:23.280
providing safe and high-quality products.

366
00:42:23.280 --> 00:42:28.920
I also do not agree with Rothbard's dismissal of national borders as something warranting

367
00:42:28.920 --> 00:42:30.960
special attention.

368
00:42:30.960 --> 00:42:36.280
For instance, to name one difference, domestic borders and national borders usually differ

369
00:42:36.280 --> 00:42:41.760
in that the latter involves language barriers. Furthermore, I believe that if people believe

370
00:42:41.760 --> 00:42:46.440
that there is such a thing as a nation, then this will affect their actions and thus it

371
00:42:46.440 --> 00:42:53.760
is worthy of attention. I find that Rothbard tends to oversimplify this matter too much.

372
00:42:53.760 --> 00:43:02.640
Well, I would say that in this chapter, with respect to this chapter, he's downplaying

373
00:43:02.640 --> 00:43:11.000
the role of national borders to explain some theoretical elements of these issues, such

374
00:43:11.000 --> 00:43:17.880
as the immigration problem, such as the tariff, the problems with tariffs.

375
00:43:17.880 --> 00:43:25.880
But I don't think that Rothbard would dismiss the issue of national borders in general at all.

376
00:43:29.880 --> 00:43:38.880
On page 1098, do quality standards actually prohibit change or merely make it more costly?

377
00:43:38.880 --> 00:43:43.880
If the government prohibits the sale of computers with less than two gigs of RAM,

378
00:43:43.880 --> 00:43:53.880
Any new technology for computer memory would have to be in addition to the old RAM technology, but it would still be possible, correct?

379
00:43:53.880 --> 00:44:08.880
Well, it certainly would be possible, but there also could be various types of drawbacks to such a quality standard, in this case, setting a minimum of 2 gigs of RAM.

380
00:44:08.880 --> 00:44:16.080
For example, there are a lot of people who are interested in buying very low-priced computers.

381
00:44:16.080 --> 00:44:21.080
As a matter of fact, there's a whole movement to provide every child in the world with the low-priced computers.

382
00:44:21.080 --> 00:44:29.080
Whether or not they have access to the internet or electricity or anything like that is beside the point.

383
00:44:29.080 --> 00:44:32.380
They just want low-cost computers in everybody's hands.

384
00:44:32.380 --> 00:44:40.620
But this type of requirement would actually hinder that potential, greatly hinder it.

385
00:44:40.620 --> 00:44:48.880
For example, two gig memory chips are already in high demand, but the smaller chips are

386
00:44:48.880 --> 00:44:55.780
in less demand and so you can actually acquire them and construct lower price computers.

387
00:44:55.780 --> 00:45:04.580
It might also, such technological regulation might also curtail the ability of the computer

388
00:45:04.580 --> 00:45:13.540
making industry to switch from one technology to another.

389
00:45:13.540 --> 00:45:19.460
If Rothbard would have had, excuse me, if Rothbard would have land to be free for the

390
00:45:19.460 --> 00:45:24.940
taking by those who mix their labor with the land, how was it that the subsidy to grant

391
00:45:24.940 --> 00:45:30.420
Right-of-Ways to Railroads isn't the policy of reserving timberlands from the market more

392
00:45:30.420 --> 00:45:38.660
of a burden on others who must pay the restrictivist price than a subsidy to railroads, at least

393
00:45:38.660 --> 00:45:43.420
with respect to the right-of-way as opposed to the lands reserved on the sides of the

394
00:45:43.420 --> 00:45:44.420
way.

395
00:45:44.420 --> 00:45:54.780
Well, I think Rothbard in particular would be against the subsidy, the giveaway of rights

396
00:45:54.780 --> 00:46:02.880
on both sides of the 15 miles, on both sides of the right-of-way, the intercontinental

397
00:46:02.880 --> 00:46:12.180
railroads were a giant scam, a big waste of resources, and that other ways, homesteading

398
00:46:12.180 --> 00:46:18.500
ways could have very easily sufficed. I mean, if a railroad sent out a survey crew and put

399
00:46:18.500 --> 00:46:24.560
down survey markers along a particular route, that would have established their property

400
00:46:24.560 --> 00:46:33.560
Rights to the entire route from the Midwest over to the West Coast.

401
00:46:33.560 --> 00:46:42.640
So I think that homesteading would have fulfilled that need with good ease and that the way

402
00:46:42.640 --> 00:46:49.840
we did it ended up causing a very inefficient building of the railroads and a fairly big

403
00:46:49.840 --> 00:46:52.080
waste of resources.

404
00:46:52.080 --> 00:46:58.280
And we can come back to all these questions if you want.

405
00:46:58.280 --> 00:47:02.480
To what extent are graphical representation, in this case the price controls, logically

406
00:47:02.480 --> 00:47:03.480
sound?

407
00:47:03.480 --> 00:47:07.240
The reasoning underlying them certainly is, but can a supply and demand curve be said

408
00:47:07.240 --> 00:47:09.440
to prove anything about price controls?

409
00:47:09.440 --> 00:47:14.720
That is, prove anything in the sense that logical argumentation does.

410
00:47:14.720 --> 00:47:20.840
In other words, are graphical representations ectodictically or only tautologically true?

411
00:47:20.840 --> 00:47:30.120
Well, in my own view, graphs with supply and demand curves are simply a way of conveying

412
00:47:30.120 --> 00:47:37.840
information, a pedagogy, a pedagogical device, rather than anything that's predictably certain

413
00:47:37.840 --> 00:47:42.840
or tautologically true.

414
00:47:42.840 --> 00:47:49.240
They're just an easier way than trying to actually draw out individual supply and demand

415
00:47:49.240 --> 00:47:53.400
Curves, and adding up the entire market and coming up with something less than a smooth

416
00:47:53.400 --> 00:47:54.400
line.

417
00:47:54.400 --> 00:47:58.680
You may have some disagreements on that one.

418
00:47:58.680 --> 00:48:08.280
And then finally, what are some examples of more recent, in the past 10 years or 20 years,

419
00:48:08.280 --> 00:48:11.280
of triangular intervention?

420
00:48:11.280 --> 00:48:22.120
Well, you know, a lot of the triangular interventions are things that already exist, but if we go

421
00:48:22.120 --> 00:48:28.280
back to 20 or 30 years, we have a variety of different things.

422
00:48:28.280 --> 00:48:36.040
I imagine we could pass around some paper and pen here and come up with 100 or so.

423
00:48:36.040 --> 00:48:44.120
There's the No Child Left Behind legislation within the last five or six years, the ethanol

424
00:48:44.120 --> 00:48:54.120
subsidy program, the American with Disability Act, which is about 20 years old, the Prescription

425
00:48:54.120 --> 00:49:01.600
Drug Act, major legislation increasing the power of the Federal Emergency Management

426
00:49:01.600 --> 00:49:31.600
Association, there's the Patriot Act, there's cap and trade, the Kyoto Protocol, which the United States hasn't signed, but certainly could be studied, and just a large variety of environmental and business regulation type of interventions that have been introduced, and then of course, Austrians also like to focus in on aspects of deregulation and privatization.

427
00:49:31.600 --> 00:49:37.240
which also would come under the rubric of triangular intervention. So there's a

428
00:49:37.240 --> 00:49:42.640
there's really a whole host of different types of triangular intervention and

429
00:49:42.640 --> 00:49:49.200
many new ones. The second part of this question is why can't sound economic

430
00:49:49.200 --> 00:49:52.680
analysis prevail in showing the contradictory and harmful effects of

431
00:49:52.680 --> 00:50:00.220
government intervention into the marketplace? Well I think it can and I

432
00:50:00.220 --> 00:50:07.220
And I think it does. The real problem is in conveying that to the general population at large.
