WEBVTT

NOTE Secession and the Moral Compact

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.700
It's very much of a pleasure to be here from the Citadel of the North and I want to thank

2
00:00:06.700 --> 00:00:13.400
Lew Rockwell and the Mises Institute for giving me the invitation to come and I also want

3
00:00:13.400 --> 00:00:19.560
to recognize my father Walter Riddle for making the drive up from Florida to attend the conference

4
00:00:19.560 --> 00:00:20.560
with us.

5
00:00:20.560 --> 00:00:27.600
I also want to say before I get into the paper that having met so many of you from all parts

6
00:00:27.600 --> 00:00:43.640
The idea of secession and the related doctrine of nullification or state interposition are

7
00:00:43.640 --> 00:00:49.480
part of the historical and theoretical dispute about original intent.

8
00:00:49.480 --> 00:00:55.000
They constitute serious questions, whether secession or interposition are included some

9
00:00:55.000 --> 00:01:01.000
in some way, in the constitutional compact, whether they are part of the intent of the founders,

10
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:08.000
whether they are part of the constitution in spirit, if not in letter, even whether secession may become legitimate

11
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:15.000
in the context of a constitution that is no longer constitutional, if judged by original intent.

12
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:22.000
Central, of course, is the concept of American federalism, the division of authority and function between

13
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:30.000
between and amongst the national government and the various state governments is at the very heart of our most pressing constitutional concerns.

14
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:44.000
Moreover, American federalism is the conceptual framework secessionist and interpositionist doctrines must employ if we are to consider them part of the constitutional legal or moral compact.

15
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:53.000
Historically speaking, the locus of power vis-à-vis the states and federal government has shifted in practical and juridical terms.

16
00:01:53.000 --> 00:01:59.000
In general, the locus of power has shifted over time from the states to the federal government.

17
00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:06.000
In light of this, nullification and secession may become constitutionally legal at one point,

18
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:13.000
or may have been constitutionally legal at one point, say before the Civil War, even if they might no longer be.

19
00:02:13.000 --> 00:02:23.000
A plausible argument could have it the other way, since the Constitution's own amendment process, as well as revolution or civil war, can change the nature of the Compact itself.

20
00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:33.000
It is generally conceded that changes to the Constitution since the Civil War have not enlarged the legal basis for nullification or secession, at least from what it was already.

21
00:02:33.000 --> 00:02:40.000
Independently, however, revolution, secession or interposition could be morally just.

22
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:45.800
For if we admit of the higher law, which I do here, at least for the sake of argument,

23
00:02:45.800 --> 00:02:51.000
the higher law which justified risking the Union as it was in order to contain slavery,

24
00:02:51.000 --> 00:03:01.000
then we must admit of the higher law which may again justify risking the Union as it is or may become in order to resist enslavement.

25
00:03:01.000 --> 00:03:08.000
Now, as in 1850, the words of William Henry Seward are appropriate.

26
00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:11.700
There are laws of various sorts which regulate the conduct of men.

27
00:03:11.700 --> 00:03:15.700
There are constitutions and statutes, codes mercantile and codes civil.

28
00:03:15.700 --> 00:03:21.300
But when we are legislating for states, all these laws must be brought to the standard of the laws of God

29
00:03:21.300 --> 00:03:25.900
and must be tried by that standard and must stand or fall by it.

30
00:03:25.900 --> 00:03:31.900
Hence, one may argue the merits of secession from a legal standpoint or from an absolute moral standpoint.

31
00:03:31.900 --> 00:03:36.900
The two standpoints might not be identical now, even if they once had been.

32
00:03:36.900 --> 00:03:43.660
In terms of the moral standpoint, secession is always a considered alternative for the thinking freeman,

33
00:03:43.660 --> 00:03:49.540
at least as a last resort, assuming he would maintain his freedom.

34
00:03:49.540 --> 00:03:55.620
Even if the so-called right wing controls Leviathan, it is of small consolation,

35
00:03:55.620 --> 00:04:00.500
little comfort whether the boot on one's back is red or true blue in color.

36
00:04:00.500 --> 00:04:05.860
Federal power simply cannot properly address or acknowledge the disparities that make us human,

37
00:04:05.860 --> 00:04:08.140
the distinctions that let us live.

38
00:04:08.140 --> 00:04:13.660
Only the acknowledgement of a dual federal and state sovereignty produces a situation

39
00:04:13.660 --> 00:04:17.860
in which liberal and conservative changes compete with each other on equal footing

40
00:04:17.860 --> 00:04:21.740
and do not subvert the whole edifice of constitutional government.

41
00:04:21.740 --> 00:04:28.660
So-called cooperative federalism is fine, so long as it is voluntary and non-coercive.

42
00:04:28.660 --> 00:04:31.700
Cooperation does not mean co-option, however,

43
00:04:31.700 --> 00:04:36.640
Nor may existential cooperation between federal and state levels of government

44
00:04:36.640 --> 00:04:41.380
change the constitutional basis of dual sovereignty.

45
00:04:41.380 --> 00:04:46.140
The founders believed in a minimalist state and the ultimate sovereignty of the people.

46
00:04:46.140 --> 00:04:49.020
They conceived of government as a necessary evil.

47
00:04:49.020 --> 00:04:52.780
The founders did not value government per se, they valued freedom.

48
00:04:52.780 --> 00:04:55.500
They did not value what government could do for them,

49
00:04:55.500 --> 00:05:00.820
but what they could do for themselves in an environment characterized by ordered liberty.

50
00:05:00.820 --> 00:05:06.500
Government was simply needed to protect the maximum possible extent of what they valued most,

51
00:05:06.500 --> 00:05:13.380
their liberty, liberty to pray and to praise, to minister and to enjoy fellowship, to tithe and to serve,

52
00:05:13.380 --> 00:05:16.900
liberty to work out one's own salvation with fear and trembling,

53
00:05:16.900 --> 00:05:20.660
and to fulfill the purpose of life as if there were one,

54
00:05:20.660 --> 00:05:27.060
liberty to love, to wed, to raise children in safety, to nurture and to pass on a goodly inheritance,

55
00:05:27.060 --> 00:05:31.620
Liberty to Work, to Build, to Produce, to Achieve and to Succeed.

56
00:05:31.620 --> 00:05:36.260
The word Federalism comes from a Latin root meaning Covenant.

57
00:05:36.260 --> 00:05:40.460
The Founding Fathers recognized the way people think and relate to one another

58
00:05:40.460 --> 00:05:45.500
is the most fundamental feature in the whole process of actual governance.

59
00:05:45.500 --> 00:05:49.700
Hence, Federalism was and is more than just a form.

60
00:05:49.700 --> 00:05:54.700
It evidences the Founder's most basic assumption concerning human affairs,

61
00:05:54.700 --> 00:05:57.940
namely, its grassroots nature.

62
00:05:57.940 --> 00:06:02.980
Localities create covenantal relationships with God and with each other,

63
00:06:02.980 --> 00:06:06.980
which preclude all but a limited role for governments.

64
00:06:06.980 --> 00:06:10.380
Moreover, Tocqueville reached the same conclusion

65
00:06:10.380 --> 00:06:12.500
and said that covenantal relationships

66
00:06:12.500 --> 00:06:17.100
comprise the strength of American-style democracy.

67
00:06:17.100 --> 00:06:19.900
While the Civil War may have altered the Federal-State relationship,

68
00:06:19.900 --> 00:06:23.500
it did not justify social revolution beyond the terms of peace

69
00:06:23.500 --> 00:06:25.980
or Actual Constitutional Amendment.

70
00:06:25.980 --> 00:06:29.540
For instance, the Civil War did not change natural law,

71
00:06:29.540 --> 00:06:33.700
common American Republican heritage, including the right to revolution,

72
00:06:33.700 --> 00:06:37.460
founders' intent, nor most of the original compact.

73
00:06:37.460 --> 00:06:41.700
As regards Federalism, the most basic mechanism for vertical check and balance,

74
00:06:41.700 --> 00:06:47.780
it is absolutely crucial to the operation of the Constitution itself as a moral compact.

75
00:06:47.780 --> 00:06:52.860
American Federalism may not be said to have undergone fundamental change on every issue.

76
00:06:52.860 --> 00:06:58.780
If anything, the existential fact that the 30 years following Reconstruction were laissez-faire

77
00:06:58.780 --> 00:07:05.140
indicates that the Federal Government gained no superordinate role over the states by virtue of the war alone.

78
00:07:05.140 --> 00:07:10.580
The existential fact that the courts did not apply the Bill of Rights to states until the 1930s

79
00:07:10.580 --> 00:07:14.540
and then only selectively through the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause

80
00:07:14.540 --> 00:07:19.580
indicates the application is of much more recent origin than the Civil War.

81
00:07:19.580 --> 00:07:26.620
Courts did not even start to apply the 14th Amendment to activities by private companies and individuals until the 1950s.

82
00:07:26.620 --> 00:07:35.100
Indeed, liberal historians used the Civil War to exaggerate constitutional change and an associated social revolution

83
00:07:35.100 --> 00:07:43.260
in order to validate subsequent changes they approved and avoid defense of the measures on substantive constitutional grounds.

84
00:07:43.260 --> 00:07:50.620
The orbits of respective sovereignty between state and federal levels remain inviolable.

85
00:07:50.620 --> 00:07:56.460
Outside the particulars of revolutionary change, at least in terms of constitutionality,

86
00:07:56.460 --> 00:07:59.620
nothing new may contradict anything old.

87
00:07:59.620 --> 00:08:03.900
Certainly, it is possible for the moors of a people to evolve,

88
00:08:03.900 --> 00:08:09.860
and a society may voluntarily change the laws under which it lives to reflect the changing norms.

89
00:08:09.860 --> 00:08:15.140
The original position of norms and range of acceptable conduct, however,

90
00:08:15.140 --> 00:08:20.500
may not become unconstitutional per se within the orbit of state sovereignty,

91
00:08:20.500 --> 00:08:25.300
unless there is a change to the Constitution through revolution or bona fide amendment.

92
00:08:25.300 --> 00:08:29.540
This must be so, given that scheme of American federalism

93
00:08:29.540 --> 00:08:33.700
in which states represent separate societies of people.

94
00:08:33.700 --> 00:08:38.260
Indeed, the Constitution institutionalizes the co-equal status of states

95
00:08:38.260 --> 00:08:43.260
states as separate societal units and polities without regard to population.

96
00:08:43.260 --> 00:08:47.260
For instance, representation of the Senate is equal for big and small states alike.

97
00:08:47.260 --> 00:08:53.260
The fact that the original constitutional compact conceived of states as possessing power

98
00:08:53.260 --> 00:08:57.260
to determine socio-economic issues as fundamental as slavery

99
00:08:57.260 --> 00:09:03.260
testifies to the competency and legitimacy of state action on practically every matter

100
00:09:03.260 --> 00:09:07.260
not since removed by war or amendment from state purview.

101
00:09:07.260 --> 00:09:24.260
The 13 original states represented 13 different societies, Republican in form, but disparate in terms of the degree to which various rights were protected, in terms of crimes and punishments, in terms of how government impacted the everyday lives of the people.

102
00:09:24.260 --> 00:09:33.260
The societies held different values, and Congress and the courts recognized that different values required different sets of laws in every state.

103
00:09:33.260 --> 00:09:39.780
Moreover, the states joined the Union to better ensure their viability and self-determination,

104
00:09:39.780 --> 00:09:43.900
meaning the ability to engage in voluntary social evolution.

105
00:09:43.900 --> 00:09:49.140
No state ever voluntarily joined the Union to destroy what was unique about itself.

106
00:09:49.140 --> 00:09:52.820
States joined to enhance or secure their uniqueness

107
00:09:52.820 --> 00:09:56.340
and to improve social conditions voluntarily over time.

108
00:09:56.340 --> 00:10:01.740
If anything, joining the National Political Union was meant to ensure societal independence.

109
00:10:01.740 --> 00:10:04.540
States were supposed to govern themselves differently

110
00:10:04.540 --> 00:10:07.940
because their people and their circumstances differed.

111
00:10:07.940 --> 00:10:11.140
This was also true as the nation expanded westward.

112
00:10:11.140 --> 00:10:15.440
Only in the 20th century has existential disparity of laws

113
00:10:15.440 --> 00:10:18.640
and some values been challenged by the federal government

114
00:10:18.640 --> 00:10:22.640
through a reinterpretation of the Constitution.

115
00:10:22.640 --> 00:10:28.540
It stands to reason that difference is the stuff of Madisonian federalism.

116
00:10:28.540 --> 00:10:30.540
Without it, there is no federalism.

117
00:10:30.540 --> 00:10:35.820
and every difference of opinion ought not be regarded as a difference of Republican principle.

118
00:10:35.820 --> 00:10:40.220
Remember, the states had to ratify the Constitution and it was the Bill of Rights

119
00:10:40.220 --> 00:10:45.940
that had been the most important Federalist concession to gain anti-Federalist support.

120
00:10:45.940 --> 00:10:49.940
The people wanted the benefits of a stronger central government.

121
00:10:49.940 --> 00:10:55.020
They were skeptical, however, lest that new Federal government grow too powerful

122
00:10:55.020 --> 00:10:58.780
and threaten the liberty they already enjoyed in the states.

123
00:10:58.780 --> 00:11:05.780
On this basis, if it were ever constitutional in states for children to pray in public schools,

124
00:11:05.780 --> 00:11:10.780
then it remains constitutional, borrowing a change to the Constitution itself.

125
00:11:10.780 --> 00:11:16.380
This is true even if all 50 states change their laws to make it illegal to do so.

126
00:11:16.380 --> 00:11:23.180
Likewise, if it were ever constitutional for separate state societies to make laws regulating abortion,

127
00:11:23.180 --> 00:11:28.180
then it is ever constitutional for them to do so unless the Constitution is amended

128
00:11:28.180 --> 00:11:31.140
or a revolution ensues for that purpose.

129
00:11:31.140 --> 00:11:35.780
Punishment that was neither cruel nor unusual under the original constitution

130
00:11:35.780 --> 00:11:38.020
may not become unconstitutional

131
00:11:38.020 --> 00:11:40.340
simply because the mores of the people change

132
00:11:40.340 --> 00:11:43.700
and local laws regulating punishments change.

133
00:11:43.700 --> 00:11:50.820
In other words, people must be constitutionally able to change their mores back again.

134
00:11:50.820 --> 00:11:56.980
A state must be able to constitutionally revert to a previously constitutional position.

135
00:11:56.980 --> 00:12:00.480
It is absurd to think that if George Washington were here today,

136
00:12:00.480 --> 00:12:04.580
he would be unable to constitutionally do half the things he could have done

137
00:12:04.580 --> 00:12:07.540
when the Constitution read exactly the same.

138
00:12:07.540 --> 00:12:12.680
Mind you, I am not suggesting that laws might not or should not be different,

139
00:12:12.680 --> 00:12:15.180
but laws should not have to be different

140
00:12:15.180 --> 00:12:19.180
if constitutional amendment does not follow the law.

141
00:12:19.180 --> 00:12:23.580
The Civil War did not change our inherently conservative system of government

142
00:12:23.580 --> 00:12:26.180
based on a written Constitution.

143
00:12:26.180 --> 00:12:33.700
The Tribunal of Arms settled two questions that had plagued the country from its inception, slavery and secession.

144
00:12:33.700 --> 00:12:37.180
Northern victory meant that slavery was abolished.

145
00:12:37.180 --> 00:12:45.340
In addition, secession as a legal, peaceful alternative was denied within the organic framework of the Constitution.

146
00:12:45.340 --> 00:12:49.780
Emancipation was quickly validated by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.

147
00:12:49.780 --> 00:12:56.900
Ironically, no similar constitutional validation exists concerning secession one way or another.

148
00:12:56.900 --> 00:13:02.420
For that matter, no constitutional mention exists regarding the closely related concept of nullification,

149
00:13:02.420 --> 00:13:04.700
also known as state interposition.

150
00:13:04.700 --> 00:13:09.900
In addition, the Tribunal of Arms, of course, always hears an appeal.

151
00:13:09.900 --> 00:13:17.060
Ironically, the Constitution and Federal Government have recognized legal secession under certain circumstances

152
00:13:17.060 --> 00:13:22.340
by recognition of the sovereign state of West Virginia formed out of Virginia.

153
00:13:22.340 --> 00:13:27.460
Vermont was formed by the inhabitants out of land claimed by New York and New Hampshire,

154
00:13:27.460 --> 00:13:31.900
again in revolutionary circumstance during the American Revolution.

155
00:13:31.900 --> 00:13:35.900
The Joint Resolution annexing Texas to the United States authorized Texans

156
00:13:35.900 --> 00:13:39.580
to form an additional four states out of her territory,

157
00:13:39.580 --> 00:13:43.900
something I understand they're not going to do.

158
00:13:43.900 --> 00:13:50.600
The nearly complete decline of American federal-republican system of government is not a product of the Civil War.

159
00:13:50.600 --> 00:13:57.660
Except for discrete changes, the relationship of restored states to the federal government remain exactly as always had been.

160
00:13:57.660 --> 00:14:04.000
The decline of federalism is a product of the 20th century of plebeian democracy, judicial activism,

161
00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:08.600
the decline of cultural values, and government income taxing authority.

162
00:14:08.600 --> 00:14:12.200
Many of these disintegrators were established in the progressive era.

163
00:14:12.200 --> 00:14:15.960
War and welfare have propelled them to corrosive heights.

164
00:14:15.960 --> 00:14:19.560
Moreover, the great ideological struggle with communism this century

165
00:14:19.560 --> 00:14:23.200
has affected us more than we may reckon.

166
00:14:23.200 --> 00:14:25.400
For Madisonian federalism to return,

167
00:14:25.400 --> 00:14:28.280
the factors causing its decline must be addressed.

168
00:14:28.280 --> 00:14:30.840
The most helpful rediscovery we could make

169
00:14:30.840 --> 00:14:34.000
is to learn that limited government is good government,

170
00:14:34.000 --> 00:14:37.080
and what a government need not do, it should not do.

171
00:14:37.080 --> 00:14:39.480
Dual sovereignty in the Constitution has it

172
00:14:39.480 --> 00:14:43.480
says it that the Federal Government guarantees a Republican form of government,

173
00:14:43.480 --> 00:14:50.480
whereas the advance or retreat of particular policies are subject only to the will of the people in the respective states,

174
00:14:50.480 --> 00:14:54.480
except as constitutionally prescribed or proscribed.

175
00:14:54.480 --> 00:15:00.480
Moreover, the wording and historical context of the Constitution is mostly proscriptive in nature,

176
00:15:00.480 --> 00:15:03.480
in terms of its effect on the people in several states.

177
00:15:03.480 --> 00:15:08.480
That is to say, everything not specifically prohibited is constitutional per se.

178
00:15:08.480 --> 00:15:13.480
The Founder's intent was to leave intact the maximum possible sphere of liberty.

179
00:15:13.480 --> 00:15:16.480
That is very different from prescriptive government,

180
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:20.480
which defines the extent of liberty by defining what you can do.

181
00:15:20.480 --> 00:15:23.480
Anything not prescribed then requires permission.

182
00:15:23.480 --> 00:15:28.480
The Federal Government of the United States now acts in a prescriptive manner.

183
00:15:28.480 --> 00:15:34.480
If some do not recognize their impending slavery, it is because the tyrant who steals our freedoms is subtle,

184
00:15:34.480 --> 00:15:40.840
multi-faceted, sometimes benevolent and wears the mask of a smiling bureaucrat and a government social worker

185
00:15:40.840 --> 00:15:44.400
who has your supposed best interests in mind.

186
00:15:44.400 --> 00:15:52.120
Even if some of the laws we live under are good, the issue is where these laws should originate and by whom they should be administered.

187
00:15:52.120 --> 00:15:59.480
The situation has actually grown markedly worse since 1965 when the federal government began using preemption statutes.

188
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:03.840
Augmented already by the power to raise huge sums of money through income tax,

189
00:16:03.840 --> 00:16:12.440
The government now preempts entire functional areas from state government purview and sets national standards to be enforced.

190
00:16:12.440 --> 00:16:20.540
Vast accretion of power to the federal government has occurred through this method, which represents a revolution in nation-state relations.

191
00:16:20.540 --> 00:16:29.240
There are now 14 distinctive types of total preemption statutes enacted by Congress, as well as eight categories of partial preemption.

192
00:16:29.240 --> 00:16:35.680
It amounts to nullification on a grand scale by the federal government of state and local laws.

193
00:16:35.680 --> 00:16:41.400
When the federal government determines whom you may hire, whom you may fire, and under what circumstances.

194
00:16:41.400 --> 00:16:44.520
When the federal government tells you what you can purchase and what you can sell,

195
00:16:44.520 --> 00:16:48.600
where you can use an item and what advertisements are acceptable to market it.

196
00:16:48.600 --> 00:16:52.400
When the federal government tells you who to rent to and what you may charge,

197
00:16:52.400 --> 00:16:58.200
who you may hire as a babysitter and how much social security taxes you'll have to put up for the privilege.

198
00:16:58.200 --> 00:17:04.200
When the federal government tells you what fuel to put in your car, who to consult for medical advice, and what advice you must take,

199
00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:09.040
then the federal government has reduced us all to its children and become our nanny state.

200
00:17:09.040 --> 00:17:13.360
All these things for our benefit are very nicely intended.

201
00:17:13.360 --> 00:17:18.760
It reminds me of the paternalistic rationale for the antebellum-south peculiar institution.

202
00:17:18.760 --> 00:17:25.480
Slavery is a positive good because it regulates the slaves much better than they could regulate themselves.

203
00:17:25.480 --> 00:17:29.800
Slavery is good because the masters care for his slaves better than private property.

204
00:17:29.800 --> 00:17:33.720
He cares for them as if they were their own children.

205
00:17:33.720 --> 00:17:38.400
Slavery is good because labor is rewarded by what the laborer needs,

206
00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:44.880
a roof, some food, a set of clothing, a pair of shoes, even conjugal visitations.

207
00:17:44.880 --> 00:17:50.040
Well, it is my contention that children such as there are belong to parents and not to the state.

208
00:17:50.040 --> 00:17:55.200
The vast majority of us, however, are no longer children and resent being treated as such.

209
00:17:55.200 --> 00:17:58.600
We may indeed not regulate ourselves as well as Big Brother.

210
00:17:58.600 --> 00:18:01.560
On the other hand, it will be the bed we make that we sleep in,

211
00:18:01.560 --> 00:18:04.720
and there is inherent satisfaction in that.

212
00:18:04.720 --> 00:18:09.880
The risk of failure is worth the success we truly call our own.

213
00:18:09.880 --> 00:18:12.920
Moreover, slavery is an unacceptable condition.

214
00:18:12.920 --> 00:18:16.840
Political slavery every bit as much as chattel slavery.

215
00:18:16.840 --> 00:18:21.240
Indeed, when one looks to the debates concerning the Fifteenth Amendment,

216
00:18:21.240 --> 00:18:24.760
the adoption of which, I admit, is highly dubious,

217
00:18:24.760 --> 00:18:31.440
The most persuasive rationale for extending suffrage to the freedman was that actual political representation,

218
00:18:31.440 --> 00:18:39.240
including the right to vote for one's own representative, was tantamount to staving off abject slavery by some other name.

219
00:18:39.240 --> 00:18:47.240
Point being, political slavery is necessary, albeit insufficient, to affect absolute subjugation of a people.

220
00:18:47.240 --> 00:18:54.880
Political slavery precurses serfdom, confinement to the pale or sale at the auction block.

221
00:18:54.880 --> 00:19:02.960
It was this sure knowledge that led the revolutionary generation to take extreme measures before such action became impossible.

222
00:19:02.960 --> 00:19:07.800
In hindsight, the revolution constituted secession from the mother country.

223
00:19:07.800 --> 00:19:13.520
Thirteen colonies revolted against the tyranny of their central government.

224
00:19:13.520 --> 00:19:21.220
If truth were relative, then subjective community standards are far the better way to go than a one-size-fits-all Federal version of truth.

225
00:19:21.220 --> 00:19:29.580
If the law should be living, meaning that it should change to address changing social needs, then it should be living where the people live.

226
00:19:29.580 --> 00:19:37.820
In effect, that is the function of state orbits to experiment, even to compete with each other in the open marketplace of ideas,

227
00:19:37.820 --> 00:19:42.580
so that the good will out to let people decide the way they should live.

228
00:19:42.580 --> 00:19:49.180
It would be useless to contend that anyone should be able to live anywhere and find everything to his or her liking.

229
00:19:49.180 --> 00:19:53.540
A place where everyone is happy is literally a place where no one is happy.

230
00:19:53.540 --> 00:19:56.980
At some point, people must be able to legislate their environment.

231
00:19:56.980 --> 00:20:03.420
That is your Jacksonian democracy and that is your populism, but it must be operative at the local level.

232
00:20:03.420 --> 00:20:08.540
People must be able to determine the nature of their schools and towns and to secure their property.

233
00:20:08.540 --> 00:20:13.820
For these are the vehicles through which they pursue happiness and derive a meaning to life.

234
00:20:13.820 --> 00:20:19.700
The liberal statist alternative is not the best solution for everyone, which elitists would like to think.

235
00:20:19.700 --> 00:20:28.380
Empirically, the statist solution devolves into tribalism and radicalizes factions that might otherwise constructively participate.

236
00:20:28.380 --> 00:20:37.820
What the federal government has done is to take a creative and dynamic process and create instead the divisiveness so apparently rife in this country.

237
00:20:37.820 --> 00:20:40.900
Under American Federalism, you may not get it right everywhere.

238
00:20:40.900 --> 00:20:47.140
Communities and whole states might prescribe or proscribe too much or too little,

239
00:20:47.140 --> 00:20:49.660
but you would get it right in many areas.

240
00:20:49.660 --> 00:20:54.700
Moreover, you would be assured of finding a place that catered to one's priority preferences.

241
00:20:54.700 --> 00:21:01.340
Today, it's wrong everywhere, and there is no place left at all for traditionalists.

242
00:21:01.340 --> 00:21:08.200
American federalism envisions disparities between the states, even on the most important matters.

243
00:21:08.200 --> 00:21:13.840
Oregonians should be able to decide the so-called right-to-die referendum.

244
00:21:13.840 --> 00:21:18.240
Californians should be able to deny state benefits to illegal residents.

245
00:21:18.240 --> 00:21:22.440
Coloradans should be able to determine state policy towards homosexuality

246
00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:26.280
or deny special legal protections for gay people and so on.

247
00:21:26.280 --> 00:21:31.440
Know that I have refrained from indicating my preference as to how the vote should go.

248
00:21:31.440 --> 00:21:35.840
Rather, I believe strongly that these and other matters belong to the states

249
00:21:35.840 --> 00:21:40.600
and are matters for each separate society to determine for itself.

250
00:21:40.600 --> 00:21:44.680
In the meantime, the Constitution of the United States should not be whipped about

251
00:21:44.680 --> 00:21:47.800
by the vigorous nature of each debate.

252
00:21:47.800 --> 00:21:52.000
National political mobilization of those with vested interest or vested concern

253
00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:55.440
need not occur every time someone somewhere challenges a norm

254
00:21:55.440 --> 00:21:58.600
or claims some new right.

255
00:21:58.600 --> 00:22:02.560
State boundaries were the fire breaks envisioned and explained by the founders

256
00:22:02.560 --> 00:22:05.600
to keep factions from ever spreading beyond them,

257
00:22:05.600 --> 00:22:08.040
to remove the political boundaries, so to speak,

258
00:22:08.040 --> 00:22:11.360
by imposing centrally planned and executed standards

259
00:22:11.360 --> 00:22:15.280
or by interfering with another state's prerogatives from outside,

260
00:22:15.280 --> 00:22:18.320
creates instability or tyranny or both.

261
00:22:18.320 --> 00:22:21.920
The American Republic thus falls prey to all the ancient ills

262
00:22:21.920 --> 00:22:25.080
that plagued other republics, especially large republics.

263
00:22:25.080 --> 00:22:33.680
Ills which Monsesquieu wrote about, and which the Founding Fathers erected the Federalist mechanism to preclude.

264
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:40.780
Jefferson said we would probably need a revolution every 20 years or so, and by my math, we apparently are long overdue.

265
00:22:40.780 --> 00:22:44.280
Secession is one form of conservative revolution.

266
00:22:44.280 --> 00:22:52.180
The threat of it is a powerful incentive to the Federal Government to maintain its limited scope and to refrain from constitutional overreach.

267
00:22:52.180 --> 00:23:00.480
Secession is always, morally speaking, legitimate by the same rationale Jefferson used in the Declaration of Independence.

268
00:23:00.480 --> 00:23:06.880
Secession or revolution must obviously meet certain criteria, but its right in the abstract cannot be denied.

269
00:23:06.880 --> 00:23:12.580
Moreover, the founders themselves provided criteria by which to judge the proper occasion for action,

270
00:23:12.580 --> 00:23:20.080
both in terms of empirical precedent during the American Revolution, as well as in terms of written theoretical discourse.

271
00:23:20.080 --> 00:23:24.240
The Virginia and Kentucky Results were written by Madison and Jefferson in 1798.

272
00:23:24.240 --> 00:23:27.880
They are explicit in their delineation of dual sovereignty,

273
00:23:27.880 --> 00:23:33.600
by which state sovereignty is as inviolable as the federal government's.

274
00:23:33.600 --> 00:23:35.720
Notwithstanding questions of particulars,

275
00:23:35.720 --> 00:23:41.120
interposition is not only conceivable, it may be a duty incumbent.

276
00:23:41.120 --> 00:23:46.160
The threat of secession itself may be enough to cause the federal government to return to its proper role

277
00:23:46.160 --> 00:23:50.160
and thus reinstate the desired vertical balance within the federal system.

278
00:23:50.160 --> 00:23:56.160
Historically, secessionist movements have tended to perform this positive latent function.

279
00:23:56.160 --> 00:24:00.160
In 1785, for instance, while still under the Articles of Confederation,

280
00:24:00.160 --> 00:24:04.160
the United States abandoned the disastrous Jay Gardoke Treaty

281
00:24:04.160 --> 00:24:07.160
because of western secessionist threats.

282
00:24:07.160 --> 00:24:11.160
When the federalists exceeded constitutional authority by passing the Alien and Sedition Acts,

283
00:24:11.160 --> 00:24:15.160
similar threats were made, this time while the nation operated

284
00:24:15.160 --> 00:24:17.160
under the rubric of the Constitution.

285
00:24:17.160 --> 00:24:19.160
The issue was finally solved

286
00:24:19.160 --> 00:24:22.160
through the Jeffersonian political revolution of 1800.

287
00:24:22.160 --> 00:24:25.660
The election was an overwhelming repudiation

288
00:24:25.660 --> 00:24:30.160
of the extreme federalist party position of unitary federal sovereignty.

289
00:24:30.160 --> 00:24:34.660
Americans were gratified that secession or civil war were unnecessary,

290
00:24:34.660 --> 00:24:37.660
but the backdrop of revolutionary political commitment

291
00:24:37.660 --> 00:24:41.660
was essential to producing the first peacetime transition of power

292
00:24:41.660 --> 00:24:44.160
between parties in American history.

293
00:24:45.160 --> 00:24:54.160
In terms of a positive, latent, if not manifest function, secession may very well be a necessary and proper means of reacting to Federal encroachments.

294
00:24:54.160 --> 00:25:00.160
The Constitution has evolved this century without the aid of secessionist counterbalance.

295
00:25:00.160 --> 00:25:06.160
Hence, the Constitution has not evolved explicitly through amendment, civil war, or clear political mandate.

296
00:25:06.160 --> 00:25:12.160
Rather, it has evolved through force and threat of force by every single branch of the Federal Government,

297
00:25:12.160 --> 00:25:18.480
by activist presidents, by micromanaging congressmen and bureaucrats, by activist judges with social agendas.

298
00:25:18.480 --> 00:25:27.800
The people are now reduced to having to overcome the burden of constitutional amendment just to restore original intent.

299
00:25:27.800 --> 00:25:31.640
The liberty we have gotten is not the ordered sort the founders intended.

300
00:25:31.640 --> 00:25:34.960
It serves no purpose nor ends but our own destruction.

301
00:25:34.960 --> 00:25:41.360
We witness now the onset of social chaos sanctioned by government without the consent of the people to do it.

302
00:25:41.360 --> 00:25:45.720
The New Deal and Great Society transformed the entire country into one big political machine

303
00:25:45.720 --> 00:25:50.040
in which politicians parceled favors from the Federal Port Barrel or through regulatory

304
00:25:50.040 --> 00:25:54.960
agencies to the various special interest groups, which then scratched politicians' backs at

305
00:25:54.960 --> 00:26:01.400
election time. The point being, that power may not now be exercised by democratic majorities

306
00:26:01.400 --> 00:26:07.360
at all, consolidated, concurrent or otherwise. James Q. Wilson of UCLA and past president

307
00:26:07.360 --> 00:26:11.600
of the American Political Science Association, argues that elections have become less important

308
00:26:11.600 --> 00:26:16.160
because the real policy making is now done by courts, bureaucracies and legislatures

309
00:26:16.160 --> 00:26:22.380
operated by an ambitious political class with very little orientation towards public preferences.

310
00:26:22.380 --> 00:26:27.500
This equates to the development of a kind of American court party, so inimical to Republican

311
00:26:27.500 --> 00:26:33.700
institutions. If we are no longer actually represented, then we are taxed at average

312
00:26:33.700 --> 00:26:52.700
The two most discernible trends this century have been the growth of the federal government and the decline of what is known as Victorian values, industriousness, sobriety, self-control and modesty.

313
00:26:52.700 --> 00:27:01.700
The two trends are linked in that the concentration of power at the central level of government has debilitated state and local government's ability to foster healthy social climates

314
00:27:01.700 --> 00:27:08.700
or to maintain the institutional supports, family, church, school or neighborhood necessary to maintain and transmit the culture.

315
00:27:08.700 --> 00:27:16.700
Federal government action impedes the institutions of family and church, which have made communal life heretofore possible in America.

316
00:27:16.700 --> 00:27:26.700
The result has been crisis in American families and schools and dramatic increase in the incidence of social pathologies reaching epidemic proportions over the past 30 years.

317
00:27:26.700 --> 00:27:41.700
When we realize that counterculture communes of the 1960s were actually destroyed by internal problems, rampant violence, crime and drug addiction, we may fairly assess the nation's course today to be one of national suicide.

318
00:27:41.700 --> 00:27:48.700
In such an instance, it is the prerogative of state governments to take extraordinary actions for protection.

319
00:27:48.700 --> 00:27:58.700
We have the structural framework for self-government, but Washington has substituted a government of clerks, exactly what Tocqueville called administrative despotism.

320
00:27:58.700 --> 00:28:08.700
The failure to establish local standards results in the natural dispensation of all standards known to civilized man, including the protection of life, liberating the pursuit of happiness.

321
00:28:08.700 --> 00:28:14.700
The destruction of American federalism has resulted in the cultural disintegration we see evidenced around us.

322
00:28:14.700 --> 00:28:20.700
The restoration of federalism is the beginning of cultural renewal and moral regeneration.

323
00:28:20.700 --> 00:28:26.700
My assessment is that the political system is still sufficiently open

324
00:28:26.700 --> 00:28:31.700
and that the election of 1994 has dealt the enemies of freedom a blow.

325
00:28:31.700 --> 00:28:37.700
The strong action by states at this juncture as well as a clear ultimatum of the people

326
00:28:37.700 --> 00:28:42.700
to return power rightfully belonging to the states respectively or to the people

327
00:28:42.700 --> 00:28:49.700
will truly restore the states at last, will reinvigorate American federalism as conceived by the founders,

328
00:28:49.700 --> 00:28:53.700
will secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.

329
00:28:53.700 --> 00:28:59.700
Part of the solution is probably the organization of viable secessionist alternatives.

330
00:28:59.700 --> 00:29:06.700
The one certainty is that the Federal Government may not continue its wanton disregard for the Constitution

331
00:29:06.700 --> 00:29:09.700
or for the original intent of the Founding Fathers.

332
00:29:09.700 --> 00:29:14.700
If it does, the answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind.

333
00:29:14.700 --> 00:29:18.700
An answer as old as America and as true to her purpose,

334
00:29:18.700 --> 00:29:23.700
the purpose of free men living in accord with their God.

335
00:29:23.700 --> 00:29:28.700
And then the words of Julia Ward Howe's fourth stanza to the Battle Hymn of the Republic

336
00:29:28.700 --> 00:29:30.700
take a very different meaning.

337
00:29:30.700 --> 00:29:34.700
He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat.

338
00:29:34.700 --> 00:29:38.700
He is sifting out the hearts of men before his judgment seat.

339
00:29:38.700 --> 00:29:44.700
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer him. Be jubilant, my feet. Our God is marching on.
