WEBVTT

NOTE Panel Discussion: Strategies for Changing Minds Toward Liberty

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.600
All right, this is a portion of the program where you ask questions and we make up answers.

2
00:00:06.600 --> 00:00:10.400
So, who's going to be first?

3
00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:12.000
You sir.

4
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:19.000
Yeah.

5
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:26.360
How would loaning work in a hundred percent banking industry?

6
00:00:26.360 --> 00:00:29.360
Want to give that a go? Oh yeah, Walter, can't wait.

7
00:00:29.360 --> 00:00:38.360
Murray Rothbard and several others of us favor 100% banking, which means you don't have fractional reserve banking.

8
00:00:38.360 --> 00:00:50.360
Fractional reserve banking means you give the bank, let's say Hubert is the bank and I deposit $100 in the Hubert bank.

9
00:00:50.360 --> 00:00:57.360
and now Hubert gives me a demand deposit for $100 and I can take that money whenever I want

10
00:00:57.360 --> 00:01:06.360
and then Hubert the dirty rat turns around and gives Roderick a loan for $90 because he keeps 10 as a reserve

11
00:01:06.360 --> 00:01:12.360
and now Roderick also has a demand deposit for $90. If Roderick and I both show up at the same time

12
00:01:12.360 --> 00:01:18.360
Hubert can't possibly pay this money unless he's got the Fed behind him where he can print out more stuff

13
00:01:18.360 --> 00:01:33.360
and more stuff. The point is that we have an overdetermination of ownership. Roderick and I are each the full owners of $90, not the partial owners, but the full owners, and you can't really in the libertarian society have two people owning 100% of anything.

14
00:01:33.360 --> 00:01:46.360
There was this wonderful movie, The Producers, where Zerral Mostel went around and sold $10,000 worth, not 10,000, 10,000% of a play. This is fraud.

15
00:01:46.360 --> 00:01:50.420
There are people like Selgen and White, who I regard as renegade libertarians, at least

16
00:01:50.420 --> 00:01:53.080
on this issue, I don't think they're libertarians at all.

17
00:01:53.080 --> 00:01:57.840
And there is a debate among the Austro-libertarians on that, but I've just given you the one-minute

18
00:01:57.840 --> 00:02:03.840
version of why I think that fractional reserve banking is fraudulent, it creates the Austrian

19
00:02:03.840 --> 00:02:11.840
business cycle, it creates inflation, whereas 100% backed money is, if I give Hubert $100,

20
00:02:11.840 --> 00:02:14.200
He can't lend it out to anyone else,

21
00:02:14.200 --> 00:02:15.840
any more than if he were a greenery.

22
00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:20.200
He couldn't lend out greenery on a fractional reserve basis.

23
00:02:21.400 --> 00:02:25.120
I think the question was, how would that work?

24
00:02:25.120 --> 00:02:28.160
Yeah, if I might take a stab at it,

25
00:02:28.160 --> 00:02:30.480
because I understood the question a little differently.

26
00:02:30.480 --> 00:02:33.120
How would it work in 100% reserves?

27
00:02:33.120 --> 00:02:36.480
I think you would have banking split the way they should be.

28
00:02:36.480 --> 00:02:39.920
You'd have deposit banking and you'd have lending banking.

29
00:02:39.920 --> 00:02:44.840
So, for those who would invest their money in a bank that lends money, they would know

30
00:02:44.840 --> 00:02:49.300
their money was at risk and they would know that they can't come and get it at any time.

31
00:02:49.300 --> 00:02:56.260
Whereas in fractional reserve bank as it is today, deposit banking combined with lending

32
00:02:56.260 --> 00:03:03.660
bank, that distinction isn't made so bankers lend out money that people can come and get

33
00:03:03.660 --> 00:03:08.760
any time, which is what Walter just described.

34
00:03:08.760 --> 00:03:14.280
But in a 100% banking, it can certainly take place and I think it can especially take place

35
00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:22.120
in technology where borrowers and lenders should be able to be hooked up the world over

36
00:03:22.120 --> 00:03:28.800
in a matter of seconds. Capital here should be able to find people who need capital there

37
00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:34.640
and not just at the bank down the street and lend out fractional reserves. So I think that's

38
00:03:34.640 --> 00:03:41.640
and that's how it will work. I don't think it will happen through legislation. I think it will happen through technology.

39
00:03:41.640 --> 00:03:45.640
Next.

40
00:03:45.640 --> 00:03:51.640
Just as a follow up to that, how many people actually understand the fractional reserve system in our society?

41
00:03:51.640 --> 00:03:53.640
They don't understand what you just said.

42
00:03:53.640 --> 00:03:58.640
Oh, everybody. No, everybody understands fractional reserves.

43
00:03:58.640 --> 00:04:20.640
I'll take a quick stab at it. I have no idea, but I know that most bankers don't understand it.

44
00:04:23.640 --> 00:04:27.640
Anybody have anything to add? Not many people know what's going on.

45
00:04:28.640 --> 00:04:32.640
Yes, sir. Yes, sir.

46
00:04:32.640 --> 00:04:38.640
What are some of the historical examples you look to, or what include anarcho-capitalist societies?

47
00:04:38.640 --> 00:04:46.640
Good historical examples of anarcho-capitalist societies.

48
00:04:46.640 --> 00:04:52.640
Do we have any historians here? Iceland, perhaps?

49
00:04:52.640 --> 00:05:00.640
There's never been a society of exactly the kind that we advocate, but then there's never

50
00:05:00.640 --> 00:05:06.480
been a perfect example of a minarchist society either, but what you can do is you can look

51
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:13.160
at historical cases where various different mechanisms that we talk about were in place.

52
00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:17.360
Maybe nobody had quite the whole package, but every part of it's been tried.

53
00:05:17.360 --> 00:05:22.640
So one example people talk about is medieval Iceland.

54
00:05:22.640 --> 00:05:27.840
Medieval Iceland may not have been absolutely pure energy, but it came pretty close.

55
00:05:27.840 --> 00:05:37.360
There was, you could sign up with, basically your protection agency was a local chieftain,

56
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:41.400
but you could sign up with a different chieftain without having to change your geographical

57
00:05:41.400 --> 00:05:42.400
location.

58
00:05:42.400 --> 00:05:51.400
You know, Chieftain was also your representative in the legislature, and seats in the legislature could be bought and sold.

59
00:05:51.400 --> 00:06:01.400
The problem was there was a legal limit on the upper number of seats in the legislature, so there was a legal limit on the number of Chieftain seats, and that created a problem.

60
00:06:01.400 --> 00:06:10.400
It wasn't really free entry into the market. But in terms of a market for rights protection, pretty much they had it.

61
00:06:10.400 --> 00:06:23.400
People talk about other cases, Medieval Ireland, the American Western frontier, in many respects, was stateless and had a competitive legal system.

62
00:06:23.400 --> 00:06:27.400
Other examples people want to talk about?

63
00:06:27.400 --> 00:06:35.400
There was an article, the not-so-wild Wild West and Journal of Librarian Studies, of which Roderick was the editor, and it gave that as an example.

64
00:06:35.400 --> 00:06:54.400
I would crawl with the question, the import of the question is you say you're in favor of full free enterprise and laissez-faire anarchism, has there ever been an example of it? No, well then your claim is invalid.

65
00:06:54.400 --> 00:07:01.400
We also claim that we want a society with no murder and no rape. Has there ever been such a society with no murder and no rape? No.

66
00:07:01.400 --> 00:07:06.400
Therefore we have to retract our desire to have a society with no murder and no rape? No.

67
00:07:06.400 --> 00:07:12.400
So just because there's never been a perfect example, and we're on the wrong side of the Garden of Eden for perfection,

68
00:07:12.400 --> 00:07:16.400
just because there's never been an example doesn't undermine the claim that it's a good thing.

69
00:07:16.400 --> 00:07:24.400
There are many other examples. The Law of the Sea Merchant in the 15th or the 17th century

70
00:07:24.400 --> 00:07:29.400
when somebody from Belgium was trading with somebody from England and they had a dispute.

71
00:07:29.400 --> 00:07:32.280
had Admiralty Courts and the Law Merchant.

72
00:07:33.360 --> 00:07:35.320
The Institution of Kosher Foods

73
00:07:35.320 --> 00:07:37.600
is a anarcho-capitalist kind of a thing

74
00:07:37.600 --> 00:07:41.040
because they certify foods without any government approval

75
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:43.600
and people are free to accept it or not.

76
00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:48.160
We live not in a pure anarcho-libertarian state, of course,

77
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:49.640
but there are vestiges of it.

78
00:07:49.640 --> 00:07:51.680
Whenever two people trade anything,

79
00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:55.160
whenever you go to the store and buy a newspaper for a buck,

80
00:07:55.160 --> 00:07:57.320
that's part of anarcho-capitalism.

81
00:07:59.400 --> 00:08:05.400
Sometimes you can see kind of seeds of that in completely unexpected places.

82
00:08:05.400 --> 00:08:10.400
I went to the Republic of South Africa recently, which is almost a socialist state.

83
00:08:10.400 --> 00:08:14.400
But because of the failure of the state, there is private protection agencies.

84
00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:19.400
To the point, even, that I took a picture of the headquarters of Cape Town Police Department.

85
00:08:19.400 --> 00:08:22.400
It's a huge building, high-rise Cape Town Police Department.

86
00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:26.400
There is a little plaque there. It said, protected by ADT.

87
00:08:26.400 --> 00:08:29.280
ADT, we shoot without warning.

88
00:08:29.280 --> 00:08:36.320
You go to Disney World and it's very safe, there's no murders and no rapes there and

89
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:41.760
they've got ducks and geese and mice and if you act obstreperously you're surrounded by

90
00:08:41.760 --> 00:08:45.840
them and they're all packing heat and they say come with me. They've got cameras there,

91
00:08:45.840 --> 00:08:51.920
you're very safe there. You go to Audubon Park in New Orleans or Central Park in New

92
00:08:51.920 --> 00:08:59.680
New York City or any of the big parks. And it's like anarchy. I mean, wait, no, chaos.

93
00:08:59.680 --> 00:09:04.520
Because when people get murdered there, nobody loses money. There's no weeding out of inefficient

94
00:09:04.520 --> 00:09:10.520
management of public spaces. Whereas in private spaces, it's pretty safe. This place here,

95
00:09:10.520 --> 00:09:15.440
this club is a pretty safe place because if it weren't, they would lose money and we would

96
00:09:15.440 --> 00:09:19.720
have, they would go broke or they would tend to go broke. If something happens in the streets

97
00:09:19.720 --> 00:09:49.720
One quick last note. People often point to Somalia as an example of the horrors of anarchy, but the question is, what's the relevant comparison? And there's been some interesting research done. There's an article by Ben Powell and some other people. I forget who the co-authors are, but you can find that online. Somalia after state collapse.

98
00:09:49.720 --> 00:09:56.800
The point is that if you compare Somalia, if you compare stateless Somalia with its earlier

99
00:09:56.800 --> 00:10:02.680
state-ridden self, and also if you compare it with its neighbors of comparable economic

100
00:10:02.680 --> 00:10:07.480
and cultural and political development and so forth, it's safer and more orderly than

101
00:10:07.480 --> 00:10:08.480
those places.

102
00:10:08.480 --> 00:10:12.520
So what that suggests is that the market always does the best it can with the materials that

103
00:10:12.520 --> 00:10:13.520
it's got.

104
00:10:13.520 --> 00:10:21.760
So if you got a very poor country with a horrible history and stuff, then it can't do as well

105
00:10:21.760 --> 00:10:26.280
with it as it could do with another country, but any country will do better under a state

106
00:10:26.280 --> 00:10:27.280
than it will.

107
00:10:27.280 --> 00:10:32.960
I mean, any country will do better without a state than it would do under a state.

108
00:10:32.960 --> 00:10:35.960
Question requiring a short answer.

109
00:10:35.960 --> 00:10:39.680
No, a long answer, who cares?

110
00:10:39.680 --> 00:10:40.680
Where?

111
00:10:40.680 --> 00:10:41.680
Behind the pole?

112
00:10:41.680 --> 00:10:42.680
There's a pole?

113
00:10:42.680 --> 00:10:52.680
Open Borders as a Solution to Liberty

114
00:11:12.680 --> 00:11:17.680
Most of us here are open borders, apparently. We didn't have a fair representation of the other side.

115
00:11:19.680 --> 00:11:22.680
So I'm for open borders, but I think others have written about it more, so I might pass it to...

116
00:11:23.680 --> 00:11:28.680
Yeah, I'm for open borders, and, you know, you can say, well, these people, you know, if we don't have open borders,

117
00:11:28.680 --> 00:11:34.680
people are going to come into our country, and they're going to vote for more socialism, and that's why we can't let people in across our borders.

118
00:11:34.680 --> 00:11:40.680
But if you do that, you're punishing them for a crime before they've committed it, and a crime that many of them won't commit at all.

119
00:11:40.680 --> 00:11:47.680
This is a very divisive issue within libertarian circles. Murray Rothbard changed his mind on that. I have an article where I say Rothbard 1 was correct and Rothbard 2 was wrong.

120
00:12:10.680 --> 00:12:23.680
is incorrect because he switched to the anti-immigration border. Hans Hoppe, an eminent libertarian theoretician, I would go so far as to say the most eminent libertarian theoretician is wrong on this issue. Ron Paul is wrong on this issue.

121
00:12:23.680 --> 00:12:37.680
Whereas the four of us, I think, or the five of us are on the other side, to me the question is does coming into a country per se violate the non-aggression principle? And as Hubert said, obviously not.

122
00:12:37.680 --> 00:12:43.680
And if you want to take a reductio ad absurdum of it, there is this country from which people immigrate. It's called Storkovia.

123
00:12:43.680 --> 00:12:49.680
Now you people think that babies come from, you know, the mother and the father get together. Not so, not so.

124
00:12:49.680 --> 00:12:53.680
They come from a country called Storkovia. The stork brings them here.

125
00:12:53.680 --> 00:13:00.680
The point I'm trying to make in my ineffable way or my idiotic way is that they are immigrants from this country.

126
00:13:00.680 --> 00:13:05.680
And if we're really against immigrants and we want to be logically consistent, we have to stop all babies from being born.

127
00:13:05.680 --> 00:13:09.680
How do you feel about foreign military marching into the United States?

128
00:13:35.680 --> 00:14:05.680
Walter's point, so the anti-immigration people base their anti-immigration policies on the idea of what the people are likely to do, based on where they come from, based on their national background, so think about if we started this with babies, as Walter was saying, well you're from this demographic background, so we're going to abort you because we're not confident that you're going to be supportive enough of libertarian policies, it's just totally untenable from a libertarian perspective, it's terrible.

129
00:14:05.680 --> 00:14:11.680
Yeah, well, I don't want to shoot people on the border. That would be consistent with

130
00:14:11.680 --> 00:14:16.200
this abortion principle. But from another hand, there's another point of view. I mean,

131
00:14:16.200 --> 00:14:23.680
I wouldn't say that we can decide this issue. This was for a very long time. Well, I think

132
00:14:23.680 --> 00:14:29.280
there's two major points of view. One of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, that if you have a freedom of association,

133
00:14:29.280 --> 00:14:35.440
you have a freedom of non-association as well. That means people in this country can decide

134
00:14:35.440 --> 00:14:41.440
whether they want to have more new people coming from somewhere else or not.

135
00:14:41.440 --> 00:14:47.440
So it's one, I think it's a pretty kind of reasonable argument, right?

136
00:14:47.440 --> 00:14:55.440
And other open borders, Hayek for example, he used to say that today a lot of people are coming to the United States

137
00:14:55.440 --> 00:15:03.440
not in search of American dream, not in search of hard work, whatever, but just to go on welfare roles right away.

138
00:15:03.440 --> 00:15:08.240
His point was, that's not the problem of these people, that's the problem of welfare system.

139
00:15:08.240 --> 00:15:25.040
The problem of welfare system. So we are sending these wrong signals, and we are getting, and so that the kind of the best Misesian approach would be that to have open borders, and then you have people immigrating, emigrating and what not.

140
00:15:25.040 --> 00:15:30.440
So this is very, very important, but what I want to kind of, because I am an immigrant myself,

141
00:15:30.440 --> 00:15:36.740
I would again would like to reiterate this, and maybe you will think I am obsessed or focused on that,

142
00:15:36.740 --> 00:15:49.040
that please keep this country free, because I am already an old person and I don't want to shop for another defection destination again.

143
00:15:49.040 --> 00:15:52.840
I think we're talking about peaceful immigrants. We're not talking about invading armies.

144
00:15:52.840 --> 00:16:04.840
I think there's a relevant difference between an invading army which is intent on using violence against innocent people and immigrants who are not intent on doing that.

145
00:16:22.840 --> 00:16:31.840
They don't like these people, they don't like other people, and they don't want the system of liberty that still hangs on by the thread in this country to be destroyed.

146
00:16:31.840 --> 00:16:37.840
So they are worried about a foreign invasion by effectively a military.

147
00:16:37.840 --> 00:16:40.840
And they may be wrong, but that's the true motive.

148
00:16:40.840 --> 00:16:45.840
If you want to talk about motives, that is the true motive of Americans who are worried about immigration.

149
00:16:45.840 --> 00:17:15.740
Well, I don't think I'm evading the issue. I think that we can make a clear and distinct difference between an invading army and, by definition, invasion is a violation of the non-aggression principle.

150
00:17:15.740 --> 00:17:23.240
I think most people are concerned with what Yuri talked about, the welfare or getting hospital care or getting free education or whatever.

151
00:17:23.240 --> 00:17:28.240
And the obvious answer to that is get rid of those things and you won't have that problem.

152
00:17:28.240 --> 00:17:33.740
I think that anyone invading anyone is a violation of the non-aggression principle.

153
00:17:33.740 --> 00:17:39.740
But when some people come peacefully and they're not going to invade, they just want to live here or live in a...

154
00:17:39.740 --> 00:17:44.740
I travel sometimes from Vancouver to New Orleans and I go right over the Rocky Mountains

155
00:17:44.740 --> 00:17:47.740
And I tell you, that place is empty. There's just no one there.

156
00:17:47.740 --> 00:17:56.740
Now suppose somebody from China or Mars came in there and started homesteading some land in the middle of, I don't know, Wyoming in the Rockies.

157
00:17:56.740 --> 00:18:01.740
Are they committing, per se, a crime against anyone? I don't see how they are.

158
00:18:01.740 --> 00:18:06.740
Now if they come with bazookas and guns and they start shooting people, well then they're an invading army and we should stop them.

159
00:18:06.740 --> 00:18:11.740
And I think, you know, Ron Paul is sometimes accused of not being in favor of defense.

160
00:18:11.740 --> 00:18:18.500
I think he's in favor of defense. He would like a very strong, what do you call it, Coast Guard, if I could put words in his mouth.

161
00:18:18.500 --> 00:18:24.580
He just doesn't want to have armies in every country. So you have to distinguish between offense and defense.

162
00:18:24.580 --> 00:18:28.620
You have to distinguish between peaceful immigration and invading army.

163
00:18:28.620 --> 00:18:33.980
And you know, there's that joke, do you know the difference between a bathroom and a living room?

164
00:18:33.980 --> 00:18:36.660
Don't come to my house if you don't.

165
00:18:36.660 --> 00:18:48.660
Well, if you don't know the difference between an invasion and peaceful immigration and you don't know the difference between offense and defense, then I say stay out of political economy, because those are crucial concepts.

166
00:18:54.660 --> 00:18:57.660
Next. Yes, sir.

167
00:18:57.660 --> 00:19:07.660
I hate to continue with that, but there's a second side, another side to that issue.

168
00:19:07.660 --> 00:19:14.660
I had gone from closed borders to the libertarian open borders, and I'm moving more back to closed borders,

169
00:19:14.660 --> 00:19:17.660
at least because I can read more about Western culture.

170
00:19:17.660 --> 00:19:35.660
and Dr. Lund's law, Ostrow Opinion League, that kind of law, the founding of Western culture, it doesn't matter, do we care, if the country is shifting, the Wall Street Journal just had a European,

171
00:19:35.660 --> 00:19:40.660
______ people down about 10% last decade, we've expanded up to 24%.

172
00:19:40.660 --> 00:19:46.660
You know, big issues of multiculturalism, non-assimilation of the cultures.

173
00:19:46.660 --> 00:19:55.660
Is that something that, before you or you guys want to care about, is it, are we incrementally changing the nature of this country?

174
00:19:55.660 --> 00:20:00.660
Are we going, are we, is the thought boiling in the pot and you know, it's not jumping out?

175
00:20:00.660 --> 00:20:29.660
If I had known the name of my blog was going to convert some of the closed borders, I would have chosen a different name, but if you look at the history of this country, it doesn't seem to me that the deterioration of commitment to ideals of liberty has come primarily from immigrants.

176
00:20:29.660 --> 00:20:35.580
It seems that it's come from right here in this country, right here from people of Western

177
00:20:35.580 --> 00:20:44.620
European descent have been quite committed to undermining liberty.

178
00:20:44.620 --> 00:20:51.300
I don't think that liberty is something that's unique to Western culture.

179
00:20:51.300 --> 00:20:56.260
What Western culture ended up with is a certain set of institutions for complex historical

180
00:20:56.260 --> 00:20:57.260
reasons.

181
00:20:57.260 --> 00:20:59.420
But you can find ideas of liberty in other cultures.

182
00:20:59.420 --> 00:21:02.420
and they just didn't end up with the right institutions to go with them.

183
00:21:02.420 --> 00:21:08.100
I have an article online called Austro-Libertarian Themes in Ancient Chinese Thought, Confucian

184
00:21:08.100 --> 00:21:11.100
Thought.

185
00:21:11.100 --> 00:21:16.420
So if you're going to stop people from coming into the country because they might, you know,

186
00:21:16.420 --> 00:21:21.100
they might move us in a more status direction, that's a reason to kick out of the country

187
00:21:21.100 --> 00:21:24.820
everyone who is already moving us in a more status direction.

188
00:21:24.820 --> 00:21:26.900
Unfortunately, that's the majority.

189
00:21:26.900 --> 00:21:31.900
Our prospects of kicking the majority of native citizens out of the country, I think, are slim.

190
00:21:31.900 --> 00:21:34.900
Others on this?

191
00:21:34.900 --> 00:21:38.900
Yeah, I mean, if you talk about our European traditions, well, Europe has had that.

192
00:21:38.900 --> 00:21:41.900
Before they had immigration, what did they have in the 20th century?

193
00:21:41.900 --> 00:21:44.900
They had half a century of brutal war and then half a century of socialism.

194
00:21:44.900 --> 00:21:48.900
Their European tradition didn't save them, so I think it's us spreading the ideas

195
00:21:48.900 --> 00:21:53.900
that makes the biggest difference, not what happened in the distant past.

196
00:21:53.900 --> 00:22:20.900
All right, we've got less than five minutes left and I would urge us to try another topic.

197
00:22:20.900 --> 00:22:25.700
Views on working on the black market

198
00:22:25.700 --> 00:22:30.700
to essentially display our freedoms, right?

199
00:22:31.660 --> 00:22:34.380
I guess, is that, yeah, okay.

200
00:22:34.380 --> 00:22:37.660
Yuri Maltsev should be an expert.

201
00:22:37.660 --> 00:22:42.660
Well, I came from the black market kind of place, yeah.

202
00:22:44.940 --> 00:22:48.020
And everything we could get was from black market.

203
00:22:48.020 --> 00:22:53.180
There was nothing on the, I don't know, white market or, there was no white market, it was

204
00:22:53.180 --> 00:22:55.940
central plan and black market.

205
00:22:55.940 --> 00:23:00.340
The problem with black market is because property rights are blurred in the black market.

206
00:23:00.340 --> 00:23:02.780
It's all the time source of violence.

207
00:23:02.780 --> 00:23:04.220
People shoot each other.

208
00:23:04.220 --> 00:23:10.940
In the United States, we shoot each other because of illegal drugs market, for example.

209
00:23:10.940 --> 00:23:16.320
And for example, if you go south of here and you will buy something on the abandoned parking

210
00:23:16.320 --> 00:23:22.880
and you will try it and find out that it's crashed aspirin or choke, not what you wanted.

211
00:23:22.880 --> 00:23:29.080
Then you cannot return it back for full refund in 30 days, you cannot call Illinois Office

212
00:23:29.080 --> 00:23:34.000
of Consumer Protection, cannot call your lawyer, you can just take a machine gun and enforce

213
00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:39.840
property rights and contracts, right? That's what our drug industry is producing, 46 percent

214
00:23:39.840 --> 00:23:44.660
of crime in the United States, at least 46 percent incarceration.

215
00:23:44.660 --> 00:23:49.460
In socialist societies, almost everything is prohibited. Not only legal drugs, everything.

216
00:23:49.460 --> 00:23:55.020
Entrepreneurship is illegal. Making market goods is illegal. So everything went there.

217
00:23:55.020 --> 00:24:02.900
And so that's why the Soviet Union became a murder capital of the world. So black market

218
00:24:02.900 --> 00:24:08.420
is, from one hand, it provides people with something. It's better than no market at all.

219
00:24:08.420 --> 00:24:14.260
But from another hand, it's a source of violence in many cases. And then the idea was, for

220
00:24:14.260 --> 00:24:19.820
of Reformers in Moscow, just legalize the black market and we will have a market economy.

221
00:24:19.820 --> 00:24:25.300
But it's very difficult because people operating entrepreneurs of the black market, they kind

222
00:24:25.300 --> 00:24:32.280
of know how to shoot others or how to poison the competition, but they don't know much

223
00:24:32.280 --> 00:24:39.860
about initial public offerings or stock market or rule of law. So that's why I think that

224
00:24:39.860 --> 00:25:09.860
One of the most despicable things that the government does is the FDA will not allow you if you're dying of cancer and you're on your last legs and they've given you a week to live or a month to live, they will not allow you to use an experimental drug because it's not yet approved by them. And I think that's heinous and I think if you can get the experimental drug, you should get it. Another very heinous government regulation

225
00:25:09.860 --> 00:25:14.860
The regulation that creates black markets is they don't allow markets in used body parts.

226
00:25:14.860 --> 00:25:18.860
And people die and have to go on dialysis machines because they can't get a kidney.

227
00:25:18.860 --> 00:25:27.860
It's just despicable. If they would allow a market in this, we'd be up to our armpits and kidneys to screw up a phrase.

228
00:25:27.860 --> 00:25:32.860
We wouldn't have the shortage anymore. We have the shortage because the price level is zero.

229
00:25:32.860 --> 00:25:36.860
So if you need a kidney and you can't get it and you have to break the law to do it,

230
00:25:36.860 --> 00:25:46.900
The Drug Market is probably one of the most violent cases of a black market, but take

231
00:25:46.900 --> 00:25:54.220
something that's a lot more benign. Take downloading songs. Now, if like most of us up here, you're

232
00:25:54.220 --> 00:25:58.220
against intellectual property, you think there's nothing wrong with downloading songs, now

233
00:25:58.220 --> 00:26:03.020
you could have, there are two ways you could work to be able to get free songs. One is

234
00:26:03.020 --> 00:26:06.780
you could lobby the government to try and get copyright laws changed. The other is you

235
00:26:06.780 --> 00:26:10.780
And so you can just go and bypass them and download stuff yourself.

236
00:26:10.780 --> 00:26:14.780
And the second is the black market way, it's the agorist way.

237
00:26:14.780 --> 00:26:20.780
And so I think, as I understand agorism, it's a matter of building alternative institutions, alternative practices.

238
00:26:20.780 --> 00:26:24.780
Of course it's risky, sometimes more than others.

239
00:26:24.780 --> 00:26:27.780
There are fairly low risk ways of doing some of these things.

240
00:26:27.780 --> 00:26:31.780
But it's a matter of building institutions and practices where you bypass the government,

241
00:26:31.780 --> 00:26:34.780
get it so that more and more people come to find it natural.

242
00:26:34.780 --> 00:26:39.280
and gradually the government loses support and eventually sort of social power shifts

243
00:26:39.280 --> 00:26:41.540
to these market institutions.

244
00:26:41.540 --> 00:26:48.340
So I wouldn't advise people to go out and get involved in the drug market.

245
00:26:48.340 --> 00:26:56.700
But there are other, I think, more promising ways in which we're bypassing the state.

246
00:26:56.700 --> 00:26:58.260
Anybody over here?

247
00:26:58.260 --> 00:26:59.260
Anybody?

248
00:26:59.260 --> 00:27:00.460
You, sir.

249
00:27:00.460 --> 00:27:03.860
You are the last question of the day.

250
00:27:03.860 --> 00:27:05.860
Make it good and make it short.

251
00:27:33.860 --> 00:27:48.860
Okay, we have the last question of the day. Is there a six-year plan that anybody up here has?

252
00:27:48.860 --> 00:27:57.860
And I only have one little thing I would do. If I could do one thing, I would stop withholding from people's paychecks.

253
00:27:57.860 --> 00:28:05.940
Checks. That is the only... If I could do one small thing, if people had to write a

254
00:28:05.940 --> 00:28:10.700
check on April 15th, I think it would make all the difference in the world, but I give

255
00:28:10.700 --> 00:28:11.700
it to the panel.

256
00:28:11.700 --> 00:28:18.300
Well, I'm going to suggest an agorist approach. Trying to get the government to do something,

257
00:28:18.300 --> 00:28:26.700
I've got no plan for that, but working with the right on things like homeschooling, working

258
00:28:26.700 --> 00:28:34.020
with the Left on things like raw food, various non-violent things, people in the homeschooling

259
00:28:34.020 --> 00:28:36.820
movement aren't shooting each other and people in the raw food industry aren't shooting

260
00:28:36.820 --> 00:28:41.780
each other, so black markets don't all, and of course the government is backing down more

261
00:28:41.780 --> 00:28:46.500
and more from regulating some of those things like homeschooling.

262
00:28:46.500 --> 00:28:52.220
So building alternative institutions, getting more and more people involved in seeking things

263
00:28:52.220 --> 00:28:56.500
through those institutions rather than through the state, I think that's something that we

264
00:28:56.500 --> 00:29:10.020
I agree completely.

265
00:29:10.020 --> 00:29:14.600
We can't get rid of the withholding tax because the withholding tax was offered, initiated

266
00:29:14.600 --> 00:29:18.900
by Mr. Libertarian, Milton Friedman.

267
00:29:18.900 --> 00:29:24.080
And therefore it must be pro-liberty, I'm kidding, although to be fair to Milton he did

268
00:29:24.080 --> 00:29:31.080
I did later recant and apologize for that, but still you're not going to find Murray Rothbard or anyone like that coming up with that.

269
00:29:31.080 --> 00:29:36.080
My suggestion, I notice there's not one single solitary black person in this audience.

270
00:29:36.080 --> 00:29:41.080
I've long had this initiative among the black community, I've been on TV on this thing called Our Story,

271
00:29:41.080 --> 00:29:49.080
trying to get them to see that the war on drugs is an anti-black law, that young black men are killing each other like flies,

272
00:29:49.080 --> 00:29:58.080
The blacks are disproportionately in jail for victimless crimes and that this is something they should put on the top of their platform or the top of their agenda.

273
00:29:58.080 --> 00:30:00.080
This would certainly be an opening to the left.

274
00:30:00.080 --> 00:30:10.080
Instead, what you get when you hear Thomas Sowell or Walter Williams or any of these other black people who are free enterprises, although they're a little weak on the war, but what the heck, you can't get everything.

275
00:30:10.080 --> 00:30:12.080
They say they're Oreo cookies.

276
00:30:12.080 --> 00:30:15.080
You know, they're white on the inside and black on the outside of their Uncle Tom's.

277
00:30:15.080 --> 00:30:28.080
This is a horrible thing and perhaps if we had an initiative to the black community to get them to see the heinousness of this and how it disproportionately affects their community, maybe we can make some progress in six years.

278
00:30:28.080 --> 00:30:40.020
When I came to the United States, the first thing I published was, at that time they were

279
00:30:40.020 --> 00:30:45.800
discussing 500-day plan, how to get out of communism, yes, and I wrote my own one-day

280
00:30:45.800 --> 00:30:52.480
plan, one-day plan, I don't know whether we need six days, six days even, not six years,

281
00:30:52.480 --> 00:30:57.080
because change should be going overnight, otherwise the enemies of change would mobilize

282
00:30:57.080 --> 00:31:02.360
themselves, and you cannot just, you cannot, gradual change should be eschewed in favor

283
00:31:02.360 --> 00:31:07.920
of dramatic change, overnight change, look how Soviet Union collapsed, it wasn't collapsing

284
00:31:07.920 --> 00:31:11.120
in 500 days, it collapsed overnight.

285
00:31:11.120 --> 00:31:18.040
And I would quote a famous conservative, neoconservative, imperialist, Margaret Thatcher, but she had

286
00:31:18.040 --> 00:31:20.360
sometimes very good sense of humor.

287
00:31:20.360 --> 00:31:24.680
She said that if, for example, gradual change never works.

288
00:31:24.680 --> 00:31:30.560
If we Brits would try to switch from our left-hand driving to right-hand driving and do it say

289
00:31:30.560 --> 00:31:39.920
in 100 days, sending the first week only big trucks to the right, so that would not work.

290
00:31:39.920 --> 00:31:47.880
I think that we should, yes, and speaking about plans, yes, the last kind of thing about

291
00:31:47.880 --> 00:31:52.880
Mr. Gorbachev, can you imagine, he really believed that planning system works, that

292
00:31:52.880 --> 00:31:55.540
which just didn't have a good plan.

293
00:31:55.540 --> 00:31:58.140
Can you imagine that central planning works?

294
00:31:58.140 --> 00:32:01.400
And I see so many of my colleagues in American academia

295
00:32:01.400 --> 00:32:04.120
saying exactly the same, that central planning works

296
00:32:04.120 --> 00:32:06.480
which has never had a good plan.

297
00:32:06.480 --> 00:32:09.480
And I think that in a decentralized society,

298
00:32:09.480 --> 00:32:12.480
in the society of individual self-ownership,

299
00:32:12.480 --> 00:32:14.800
we should promote what we believe in

300
00:32:14.800 --> 00:32:19.000
and try to make change as soon as it possibly can occur.