WEBVTT

NOTE Mises's Liberalism Revisited

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.000
I'm very happy to be here today addressing this great conference of the Mises Institute,

2
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:15.360
especially on the occasion of its 25th anniversary and the presentation of the Gary Schlarbaum

3
00:00:15.360 --> 00:00:19.720
Award to my friend Bob Higgs.

4
00:00:19.720 --> 00:00:24.440
I feel somewhat funny about addressing you on the thought of Ludwig von Mises.

5
00:00:24.440 --> 00:00:31.200
As far as economics goes, most, probably all, of our speakers are in a better position to

6
00:00:31.200 --> 00:00:34.600
inform you than I am.

7
00:00:34.600 --> 00:00:41.760
And most of all, we now have Guido Hülsmann's magnificent work on the life and thought of

8
00:00:41.760 --> 00:00:42.760
Mises.

9
00:00:42.760 --> 00:00:48.120
I think you've seen it all, I hope you've considered at least buying it.

10
00:00:48.120 --> 00:00:57.220
has remarkably few references in the index to me that's surprising that Judy

11
00:00:57.220 --> 00:01:04.920
Thomason is one of the best index makers in the country besides a proofreader and

12
00:01:04.920 --> 00:01:12.480
copy editor and I don't know shoot well I don't believe in I do believe in

13
00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:22.840
My friend Murray Rothbard used to say, every conspiracy is true, and there certainly is

14
00:01:22.840 --> 00:01:31.120
a point to that. Nonetheless, Dieter Holtzman's magnificent work is a landmark in intellectual

15
00:01:31.120 --> 00:01:37.480
history and the definitive work on Mises, of course, but also on the whole history of

16
00:01:37.480 --> 00:01:40.920
of the Austrian School.

17
00:01:40.920 --> 00:01:46.040
All I can claim is that I personally was acquainted with Mises and have been familiar with his

18
00:01:46.040 --> 00:01:49.040
work for a very long time.

19
00:01:49.040 --> 00:02:01.080
You know, on the other hand, I was acquainted with Cobden and Bright, according to Dr. Thornton.

20
00:02:01.080 --> 00:02:05.720
I was introduced to the thought of Mises by my high school buddy George Reisman, who had

21
00:02:05.720 --> 00:02:09.720
I had already read Human Action when we were at the Bronx High School of Science.

22
00:02:09.720 --> 00:02:17.720
Then, by some chance of fate, we met Leonard Reed and his staff at the Foundation for Economic Education.

23
00:02:17.720 --> 00:02:23.720
Through Reed, we were invited to attend the Mises Seminar at New York University.

24
00:02:23.720 --> 00:02:33.720
That's where I first met Murray Rothbard, another very fateful encounter, and a friend of mine until his untimely death.

25
00:02:33.720 --> 00:02:40.280
As soon as we entered college, George and I began an intensive study of the German language.

26
00:02:40.280 --> 00:02:46.760
After a couple of years of German, George translated Mises's epistemological foundations

27
00:02:46.760 --> 00:02:54.000
of economics and also a work that Mises admired very much on the philosophy of history by

28
00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:59.720
Heinrich Rickert, which Mises had suggested to George.

29
00:02:59.720 --> 00:03:02.680
And I translated Mises's liberalism.

30
00:03:02.680 --> 00:03:08.000
Both translations were funded modestly because they didn't have much money by the William

31
00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:10.400
Volcker Fund.

32
00:03:10.400 --> 00:03:15.800
The William Volcker Fund was a small libertarian and old right foundation which also helped

33
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:19.120
to support Murray Rothbard.

34
00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:24.600
And ever since then I followed the vicissitudes of Mises' reputation.

35
00:03:24.600 --> 00:03:30.040
I was interested to see that when Mises died in October 1973, and as a matter of fact just

36
00:03:30.040 --> 00:03:37.120
a couple of days ago, it was the 34th anniversary. Even the New York Times, and it's an obituary,

37
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:44.080
called him one of the foremost economists of this century. And later Milton Friedman, though

38
00:03:44.080 --> 00:03:49.760
he was from a totally different positivist tradition of economics, called Mises one of

39
00:03:49.760 --> 00:03:58.360
the great economists of all time. Mises' scientific achievements were indeed awesome. There's

40
00:03:58.360 --> 00:04:05.480
his pioneering work in monetary theory and the business cycle going back to 1912, his

41
00:04:05.480 --> 00:04:11.920
profound work in the methodology of economics and the a priori derivation of economic truths,

42
00:04:11.920 --> 00:04:19.680
systematizing all of economic theory in his magnum opus, Human Action and much, much more.

43
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:24.680
But I want to focus for a moment on another of his great contributions.

44
00:04:24.680 --> 00:04:31.800
At one time, people who called themselves socialists had an ideal and a goal.

45
00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:36.480
Now socialism just means constantly carping on the ever-changing critique of the free

46
00:04:36.480 --> 00:04:37.480
market.

47
00:04:37.480 --> 00:04:43.000
In my own lifetime, it was that the free market produces tail fins on cars.

48
00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:46.200
I don't know if you remember that.

49
00:04:46.200 --> 00:04:48.440
That it advertising seduces people.

50
00:04:48.440 --> 00:04:51.480
It goes, oh, it never ends.

51
00:04:51.480 --> 00:04:59.480
At that time, in the old days, the socialists had a definite program. It was a centrally planned economy.

52
00:04:59.480 --> 00:05:07.480
It was the rejection of the anarchy of the market. They called it the scientific wave of the future.

53
00:05:07.480 --> 00:05:15.480
This was the faith of thousands upon thousands of professional intellectuals in all countries,

54
00:05:15.480 --> 00:05:19.480
the people that my friend Hans was just talking about.

55
00:05:19.480 --> 00:05:27.480
One example, just read Albert Einstein's article, Why Socialism. You can easily find it on the internet.

56
00:05:27.480 --> 00:05:34.480
Read it, it's a short article, an unbelievable bunch of cliched rubbish.

57
00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:45.480
Sometimes, as with Einstein, socialists did raise the possibility that there might be some excessive bureaucracy in a socialist society.

58
00:05:45.480 --> 00:05:55.480
One might also wonder how it would be possible to combine a centrally established plan with a democracy which they also favored in any normal sense.

59
00:05:55.480 --> 00:05:59.480
But anyway, the socialists didn't deal with this.

60
00:05:59.480 --> 00:06:04.480
In any case, these were by no means the main problem.

61
00:06:04.480 --> 00:06:09.480
What of the feasibility of abolishing private property in the first place?

62
00:06:09.480 --> 00:06:22.480
How can there be any rational economic calculation if there is no market for capital goods, as there cannot be under socialism because the government owns all capital goods?

63
00:06:22.480 --> 00:06:36.480
How would the scientific socialist planners know how to allocate capital? They have to allocate capital among all the possible competing uses, as our Randian friends would say, blank out.

64
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:48.480
It was Mises' accomplishment, the sign of his superb independence of mind, to have brushed aside this pious, one just doesn't speak of such matters.

65
00:06:48.480 --> 00:06:57.480
Instead he presented comprehensively and arrestingly the insoluble problems of socialist economic calculation.

66
00:06:57.480 --> 00:07:05.480
The socialists attempted some weak rebuttals. They argued for something called market socialism.

67
00:07:05.480 --> 00:07:10.920
where you can have a market and yet the government owns everything and there was

68
00:07:10.920 --> 00:07:17.240
a big debate and of course the mainstream writers all said that Mises was wrong.

69
00:07:17.240 --> 00:07:23.840
Socialism would work just fine. About 15 years ago after the experience of the

70
00:07:23.840 --> 00:07:30.920
Soviet Union in every real existing socialist system, the socialist economist

71
00:07:30.920 --> 00:07:37.720
As Robert Heilbrunner wrote, in the end, it turns out, of course, that Mises was right.

72
00:07:37.720 --> 00:07:46.880
Whoops! I love that, of course, it turns out.

73
00:07:46.880 --> 00:07:52.040
The consequences of neglecting Mises can be seen in the history of the 20th century, in

74
00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:59.360
the tens of millions of diminished and destroyed lives in Russia, Poland, Hungary, China and

75
00:07:59.360 --> 00:08:08.800
and elsewhere. Now, Mises lived in Vienna, which was not only the city of art and music,

76
00:08:08.800 --> 00:08:17.160
the great composers Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, whose patronage, by the way, was

77
00:08:17.160 --> 00:08:26.000
afforded by the monarchy and the aristocracy. But after a while, democracy arrived in Vienna

78
00:08:26.000 --> 00:08:35.200
and the beginning of the 20th century and Vienna became the city that three times elected

79
00:08:35.200 --> 00:08:43.200
a violently anti-Semitic mayor, a man named Carl Lueger, who was the original National

80
00:08:43.200 --> 00:08:50.520
Socialist. Adolf Hitler lived in Vienna at that time and Hitler's world view was shaped

81
00:08:50.520 --> 00:09:02.080
by Carl Lueger. The Viennese still in the great Ringstrasse belt of avenues and plazas

82
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:12.880
that surrounds the downtown, they have a Carl Lueger plots because he was loved by the Viennese.

83
00:09:12.880 --> 00:09:21.760
And here is Mises in Indiana, the grandson of the high rabbi of Lemberg, not only a Jew

84
00:09:21.760 --> 00:09:27.000
but already the leading classical liberal, east of the Rhine, maybe the last authentic

85
00:09:27.000 --> 00:09:28.880
liberal in Europe.

86
00:09:28.880 --> 00:09:34.240
So Mises was woefully isolated.

87
00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:41.040
But as he wrote in his memoirs, I would not lose courage even now, I would not tire in

88
00:09:41.040 --> 00:09:46.560
When professing what I knew to be right, so I decided to write a book on socialism, which

89
00:09:46.560 --> 00:09:52.880
I had contemplated before the war, before the first world war, I now set about executing

90
00:09:52.880 --> 00:09:55.160
my plan.

91
00:09:55.160 --> 00:09:58.880
The book Mises Contemplated appeared in 1922.

92
00:09:58.880 --> 00:10:06.400
It was called Socialism, and that book found its remnant, as Albert J. Nock would say.

93
00:10:06.400 --> 00:10:12.120
Hayek explained in the introduction he wrote to the new edition of Socialism, published

94
00:10:12.120 --> 00:10:17.720
by the Liberty Press, when socialism first appeared its impact was profound.

95
00:10:17.720 --> 00:10:23.800
It gradually but fundamentally altered the outlook of many of the young idealists returning

96
00:10:23.800 --> 00:10:27.800
to their university studies after World War I.

97
00:10:27.800 --> 00:10:32.580
A number of my contemporaries who later became well known but who were then unknown to each

98
00:10:32.580 --> 00:10:36.040
other went through the same experience.

99
00:10:36.040 --> 00:10:47.040
Wilhelm Röpke in Germany and Lionel Robbins in England, about two examples, and Hayek himself, of course, but there were many others.

100
00:10:47.040 --> 00:11:04.040
So Mises began to find supporters of his views. His influence was spread through his famous seminar in Vienna, which included many thinkers who went on to achieve international eminence.

101
00:11:04.040 --> 00:11:09.040
and he continued to write for the rest of his life.

102
00:11:09.040 --> 00:11:14.040
One book is the one I translated, Liberalism, published in 1927.

103
00:11:14.040 --> 00:11:22.040
The translation has gone through a number of different names since it was published in 1962, but never gone out of print.

104
00:11:22.040 --> 00:11:27.040
The work is a short but excellent introduction to Mises' social philosophy.

105
00:11:27.040 --> 00:11:36.040
What stands out in Mises's work is that he places at the very head of the liberal program, private property.

106
00:11:36.040 --> 00:11:48.040
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels had stated in the Communist Manifesto that the theory of communism can be summed up in one expression, the abolition of private property.

107
00:11:48.040 --> 00:12:05.040
So in liberalism, Mises begins with private property, and he maintains that all the rest of the liberal theory, liberty, peace, rule of law and all the other principles, follow from this one principle of private property.

108
00:12:05.040 --> 00:12:15.040
This distinguished Mises boldly from the rest of the writers, who were now calling themselves liberals in those days, as they do today.

109
00:12:15.040 --> 00:12:22.040
They had hijacked the name of liberal, but in reality they were nothing but social democrats in disguise.

110
00:12:22.040 --> 00:12:26.040
So why was Mises ignored for so many years?

111
00:12:26.040 --> 00:12:32.040
At his seminar at NYU, for instance, NYU did not even pay his salary.

112
00:12:32.040 --> 00:12:35.040
It was paid by the Volcker Fund.

113
00:12:35.040 --> 00:12:41.040
Just as at Chicago, the University of Chicago did not pay Hayek's salary.

114
00:12:41.040 --> 00:12:43.040
It was paid by an outside foundation.

115
00:12:43.040 --> 00:12:58.040
In fact, F. A. Hayek could not even get a job in the economics department at Chicago, the department of Milton Friedman and George Stigler, because they did not consider him a scientific economist.

116
00:12:58.040 --> 00:13:03.040
Instead, he taught at the Committee on Social Thought, where I studied.

117
00:13:03.040 --> 00:13:11.080
Still at NYU, Mises had a handful of PhD students. Among them were Hans Zenholz,

118
00:13:11.080 --> 00:13:17.360
Israel Kirzner, and George Reisman. What could account for this lack of respect

119
00:13:17.360 --> 00:13:24.880
shown to Mises? I think it was what Jacques Rouef, famous economist in his

120
00:13:24.880 --> 00:13:54.880
Mises never budged an inch. He never gave an inch. As all the changing fads came and went that captured the loyalty of generation after generation of the intellectuals that Hans was talking about, from militarism and imperialism, which were all a rage at one time, to fascism, considered the wave of the future in the 1930s,

121
00:13:54.880 --> 00:13:58.880
Agenism, every variety of socialism.

122
00:13:58.880 --> 00:14:02.880
Lew Rockwell wrote an excellent article a few years ago

123
00:14:02.880 --> 00:14:06.880
called Heart of a Fighter, which you can find

124
00:14:06.880 --> 00:14:10.880
in the archive of the Mises Institute.

125
00:14:10.880 --> 00:14:14.880
And the thought of Ludwig von Mises lives on,

126
00:14:14.880 --> 00:14:18.880
has been spread today to many new thousands by the work of Lew Rockwell

127
00:14:18.880 --> 00:14:22.880
and his wonderful staff at the Mises Institute.

128
00:14:22.880 --> 00:14:30.520
It has shaped the thinking of Ron Paul, whom you've heard of, the great Ron Paul.

129
00:14:30.520 --> 00:14:38.880
I've shaken the hand of Ron Paul, as I did many, many years ago, shake the hand of Robert Taft.

130
00:14:38.880 --> 00:15:03.440
And in my view, Ron Paul is greater than Taft was even, and Mises' influence can be seen directly in the Mises Institute and the thinking of many of us,

131
00:15:03.440 --> 00:15:17.440
and directly or indirectly, in the heroic young fanatics who show up whenever Ron Paul is there and keep chanting Ron Paul, Ron Paul.

132
00:15:17.440 --> 00:15:28.440
I love those guys.

133
00:15:28.440 --> 00:15:35.240
And I think the influence of Mises' ideas will be spread even further by this great work of Guido Hülsmann.

134
00:15:35.240 --> 00:15:44.440
This is a great work. You don't have to read it all the way through, it's kind of like an encyclopedia,

135
00:15:44.440 --> 00:15:48.920
dip into, no you couldn't, if you want to read it all the way through. But you can dip into it,

136
00:15:49.880 --> 00:15:52.440
check out the references to me.

137
00:15:52.440 --> 00:16:14.440
Mises The Last Night of Liberalism

138
00:16:14.440 --> 00:16:23.440
When I first learned of the title, Mises The Last Night of Liberalism, I was a little puzzled, but eventually understood.

139
00:16:23.440 --> 00:16:32.440
It has come down to us from the late Middle Ages the phrase, night without fear and without reproach.

140
00:16:32.440 --> 00:16:48.960
and that was what Mises was, a night without fear and without reproach, filled with courage

141
00:16:48.960 --> 00:16:55.320
from beginning to the end, with an intellectual integrity that remains an inspiration to us

142
00:16:55.320 --> 00:16:59.560
all and will inspire those who come after us.
