WEBVTT

NOTE Liberty on Campus, and in America

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.000
Now, the good news is that the just plain silliness of all this stuff is becoming increasingly apparent to decision makers outside the university.

2
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:23.000
And as a result of which, students, parents, state legislatures, charitable foundations and other traditional supporters of American universities are beginning to withdraw their support.

3
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:31.000
Partly, as a result of that, the traditional university may become increasingly irrelevant in society.

4
00:00:31.000 --> 00:00:33.000
I'll come back to that in a minute.

5
00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:38.000
First, let me give you a little bit more detail on the bad news side of my story.

6
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:44.000
As I'm sure you all know, every major university, large or small, in the United States,

7
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:50.000
has departments of women's studies and African-American studies and gender studies and who knows what else.

8
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:58.000
The kind of wackiness that one associates with a place like Berkeley, or Madison, Wisconsin, exists on every single campus.

9
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:02.000
This is true even in my own adopted hometown of Athens, Georgia.

10
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:09.000
Athens is presumably a sleepy little college town in the deep south, but it's becoming more and more odd.

11
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:16.000
Just this past Tuesday of this week, the mayor of Athens, the deliciously named Gwen O'Looney,

12
00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:25.200
Mayor Aluni officially designated Athens a nuclear-free zone.

13
00:01:25.200 --> 00:01:29.100
Having lived for several years in Berkeley, also a nuclear-free zone, I can assure you

14
00:01:29.100 --> 00:01:35.840
that knowing that there will not be any radioactive materials in town does not make for a more

15
00:01:35.840 --> 00:01:38.560
peaceful night's sleep.

16
00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:42.080
The University of Georgia itself is quite liberal as well.

17
00:01:42.080 --> 00:01:46.720
The current president of UGA, Charles Knapp, is leaving at the end of this year, he announced,

18
00:01:46.720 --> 00:01:51.720
to become president of the left-wing Aspen Institute in Washington D.C.

19
00:01:51.720 --> 00:01:57.120
The Aspen Institute, if you don't know much about it, according to their mission statement,

20
00:01:57.120 --> 00:02:02.240
the mission is, quote, to enhance the quality of leadership through informed dialogue, close

21
00:02:02.240 --> 00:02:03.240
quote.

22
00:02:03.240 --> 00:02:07.960
Now that sounds innocuous enough until you notice that the dialogue consists of such

23
00:02:07.960 --> 00:02:11.760
programs as the Justice and Society Seminars.

24
00:02:11.760 --> 00:02:17.060
Those are designed to examine and explore, quote, the parameters of civil disobedience,

25
00:02:17.060 --> 00:02:21.960
white collar crime and criminal punishment, and the breakdown of long established hierarchies

26
00:02:21.960 --> 00:02:28.960
of race and gender. The Aspen Institute's board includes such prominent members of the

27
00:02:29.040 --> 00:02:35.040
elite as David Gergen, William Gray, Ann Richards, Al Shanker and Paul Volcker.

28
00:02:35.040 --> 00:02:41.740
Now, Knapp, himself an economist by the way, has very solid liberal credentials. He was

29
00:02:41.740 --> 00:02:46.700
was an official in the Labor Department in the Carter administration. He has brought

30
00:02:46.700 --> 00:02:52.980
a series of distinguished lecturers to campus as part of a series that we have called the

31
00:02:52.980 --> 00:02:59.500
Charter Lectures. The most recent charter lecturer was that prominent intellectual Tony

32
00:02:59.500 --> 00:03:06.580
Kushner, a great scholar who is the playwright, author of Angels in America, a series of Pulitzer

33
00:03:06.580 --> 00:03:09.260
or prize-winning plays about living with AIDS.

34
00:03:10.340 --> 00:03:12.600
Knapp has increased the hiring of women and minorities

35
00:03:12.600 --> 00:03:15.660
on campus and so on, the standard things.

36
00:03:15.660 --> 00:03:17.860
Now he says that he's leaving the university

37
00:03:17.860 --> 00:03:19.500
simply because he's been there for 10 years

38
00:03:19.500 --> 00:03:21.620
and it's time to move on and do something else.

39
00:03:21.620 --> 00:03:24.340
But I suspect that the university administration

40
00:03:24.340 --> 00:03:27.080
won't be all that sorry to see him go.

41
00:03:27.080 --> 00:03:30.460
And that's because Knapp has one major disability,

42
00:03:30.460 --> 00:03:31.900
I should say.

43
00:03:31.900 --> 00:03:33.740
He's a middle-aged white male.

44
00:03:34.940 --> 00:03:36.220
Now how do I know this?

45
00:03:36.220 --> 00:03:42.100
Well, in all likelihood his successor as president will not be a middle-aged white male.

46
00:03:42.100 --> 00:03:46.280
The chancellor of the University of Georgia System, a man named Stephen Porch, was recently

47
00:03:46.280 --> 00:03:55.200
interviewed about the formation of a search committee to locate a new president.

48
00:03:55.200 --> 00:04:00.300
And Porch encouraged the search committee to seek, quote, interesting-looking and, quote,

49
00:04:00.300 --> 00:04:03.420
not traditional presidential candidates.

50
00:04:03.420 --> 00:04:08.040
The search committee should not court look-alike finalists, the court said.

51
00:04:08.040 --> 00:04:12.740
Not only will you be bored to tears, you won't be able to tell one from the other.

52
00:04:12.740 --> 00:04:14.620
Give yourself some options.

53
00:04:14.620 --> 00:04:19.220
Now, that's a sensible criterion for choosing presidential candidates, right?

54
00:04:19.220 --> 00:04:24.420
You want to make sure they don't all look the same, because you might get bored.

55
00:04:24.420 --> 00:04:29.160
Like every other university, we have the usual kind of PC silliness.

56
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:34.480
For example, at random, I was looking through some university materials. I came across the

57
00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:40.040
winter quarter program for our on-campus counseling and testing center. Let me tell you the workshops

58
00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:42.920
that they're offering this quarter. And I'm reading you the complete list. This is not

59
00:04:42.920 --> 00:04:49.480
an edited, this is not excerpts. Quote, beyond tolerance, being lesbian, gay or bisexual,

60
00:04:49.480 --> 00:04:55.600
person to person, how your unconscious influences your choice of partners, relationships 101,

61
00:04:55.600 --> 00:05:02.200
Women in Transition, a Wellness Group, Can't We Just Get Along, and Gaining Self-Confidence

62
00:05:02.200 --> 00:05:07.480
Now I can assure you that we'll have the most self-actualized students at any university,

63
00:05:07.480 --> 00:05:09.680
if not the most educated.

64
00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:14.800
Now in my own discipline, economics, things aren't quite so bad.

65
00:05:14.800 --> 00:05:21.000
I've not been asked, for example, to learn and teach Ebonomics as an alternative to standard

66
00:05:21.000 --> 00:05:23.000
economics.

67
00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:27.920
As Lew mentioned last night, economists tend to be more sympathetic to the market than

68
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:34.560
they were a generation or two ago. Most economists will not go on the record of supporting price

69
00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:40.640
controls and fine-tuning of the economy and so on. However, note that the dominant position

70
00:05:40.640 --> 00:05:45.080
among economists is that markets are pretty good in moderation. You don't want to have

71
00:05:45.080 --> 00:05:50.680
too much of a market. Capitalism is indeed preferred to socialism, but only if there's

72
00:05:50.680 --> 00:05:56.800
This is a strong central government performing certain essential functions, maintaining activist

73
00:05:56.800 --> 00:06:03.480
fiscal and monetary policies, vigorously enforcing anti-trust laws, making large investments,

74
00:06:03.480 --> 00:06:07.880
i.e. government spending, in R&D and education and these sorts of things.

75
00:06:07.880 --> 00:06:13.440
Just to give you a quick example, Lew mentioned Alan Blinder last night, I came across a quote

76
00:06:13.440 --> 00:06:19.000
from Janet Yellen who was a former Berkeley professor and a member of the Board of Governors

77
00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:26.000
I recognize the difficulty of conducting monetary policy over time in a way that will damp business cycles, but I do not concede that uncertainties of economic forecasts and long and variable policy lags inevitably doom our best efforts.

78
00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:55.000
The record to me indicates that within limits, tuning works, even if it's not fine.

79
00:06:55.000 --> 00:06:59.000
So even if we can't fine tune the economy, we can still tune it just a bit.

80
00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:04.000
And of course, as Lew also mentioned, there are many positive signs in economics,

81
00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:09.000
most importantly, the growth of Austrian economics in the profession.

82
00:07:09.000 --> 00:07:11.000
There's increasing interest in the Austrian school,

83
00:07:11.000 --> 00:07:16.000
Austrian economics is becoming more and more respectable within the mainstream.

84
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:18.560
and the mainstream.

85
00:07:18.560 --> 00:07:22.600
Now there are a few exceptions to that, even within the Austrian School, and I can't help

86
00:07:22.600 --> 00:07:24.700
mentioning this one.

87
00:07:24.700 --> 00:07:29.880
At the most recent American Economic Association meetings, I was a discussant on a panel where

88
00:07:29.880 --> 00:07:36.860
one of the speakers proceeded to present a postmodern theory of the firm.

89
00:07:36.860 --> 00:07:42.400
Now I won't name the speaker, as Murray used to say, to protect the guilty, but I will

90
00:07:42.400 --> 00:07:47.560
We'll say that he's associated with a certain group of ex-Austrians at a certain university

91
00:07:47.560 --> 00:07:50.620
in Virginia.

92
00:07:50.620 --> 00:07:58.100
He argued that the stream of research on the size of the firm is all completely illegitimate.

93
00:07:58.100 --> 00:08:02.360
And the reason is because the boundaries of the firm don't exist at all.

94
00:08:02.360 --> 00:08:05.360
They're merely social constructs.

95
00:08:05.360 --> 00:08:10.640
Boundaries of the firm, that's a social construction, so there's no sense in trying to study it.

96
00:08:10.640 --> 00:08:15.000
that exists subjectively in the minds of various interpreters with their own hermeneutical

97
00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:21.400
understandings of what's going on. Now, as he said this, I wondered what he would say

98
00:08:21.400 --> 00:08:27.720
if the payroll department at his own university had a hermeneutical understanding of the boundaries

99
00:08:27.720 --> 00:08:36.120
of that institution such that he wasn't in it. I wondered how he would react to that.

100
00:08:36.120 --> 00:08:40.120
Of course, in general, on college campuses, particularly in the humanities, as I mentioned,

101
00:08:40.120 --> 00:08:46.660
Things are very bad. Things are very bad. A couple of examples. There's an academic

102
00:08:46.660 --> 00:08:54.760
journal called The Review of Higher Education, which is about trends on universities. It's

103
00:08:54.760 --> 00:09:00.500
a very well-respected academic journal. The lead article on the current issue by one Roger

104
00:09:00.500 --> 00:09:06.500
P. Morad is titled Postmodern Interdisciplinarity. I had to practice that word a few times last

105
00:09:06.500 --> 00:09:09.500
Postmodern Interdisciplinarity

106
00:09:09.500 --> 00:09:14.500
Let me just read you the abstract of the article. I won't subject you to any more.

107
00:09:14.500 --> 00:09:15.500
Quote,

108
00:09:15.500 --> 00:09:19.500
In many fields, postmodern forms of thought have recently emerged,

109
00:09:19.500 --> 00:09:23.500
posing fundamental challenges to modern assumptions concerning knowledge.

110
00:09:23.500 --> 00:09:28.500
This article explores the implications of four postmodern philosophical positions on knowledge

111
00:09:28.500 --> 00:09:31.500
to show how they reject absolute foundations

112
00:09:31.500 --> 00:09:35.500
and seek to expand the possibilities for scholarly practice.

113
00:09:35.500 --> 00:09:43.340
It further argues that an absolute foundation pervades higher education, and that it unjustifiably

114
00:09:43.340 --> 00:09:48.580
constrains the capacity of the intellect. This absolute foundation is the notion that

115
00:09:48.580 --> 00:09:53.740
legitimate intellectual activity is the disciplinary pursuit of knowledge of entities that exist

116
00:09:53.740 --> 00:09:59.140
before and independent of inquiry. A postmodern conception of higher education that would

117
00:09:59.140 --> 00:10:07.140
Expand the Playing Field for Inquiry is advanced in the article based on the flexible concept

118
00:10:07.140 --> 00:10:11.420
of intellectually compelling ideas.

119
00:10:11.420 --> 00:10:15.940
When you read between the lines here, it's clear that what most thinkers who call themselves

120
00:10:15.940 --> 00:10:22.420
postmodern means is that there are no absolute foundations to any intellectual activity.

121
00:10:22.420 --> 00:10:25.420
In other words, anything goes.

122
00:10:25.420 --> 00:10:31.540
If you think that was odd, let me assure you that that was only mildly odd.

123
00:10:31.540 --> 00:10:33.860
I was recently looking at a brochure.

124
00:10:33.860 --> 00:10:39.900
The Young Americas Foundation puts out a humorous pamphlet every year with lists of college

125
00:10:39.900 --> 00:10:46.360
course titles and descriptions pulled right out of university catalogs word for word.

126
00:10:46.360 --> 00:10:50.700
Let me read you from a sample of this collection and tell you some of the courses that are

127
00:10:50.700 --> 00:10:52.820
being offered nowadays.

128
00:10:52.820 --> 00:10:59.920
At Harvard this year, you can take such courses as Comparative Literature 108, Fetishism,

129
00:10:59.920 --> 00:11:07.100
Fine Arts 277, Queer Theory and Visuality, and Literature 124, Ecopolitics, the Environment

130
00:11:07.100 --> 00:11:13.900
in Post-Structuralist Thought. Stanford offers one of my favorites, History 212, Homosexuals,

131
00:11:13.900 --> 00:11:22.580
Heretics, Witches and Werewolves, Deviance in Medieval Society. Interestingly, Amherst

132
00:11:22.580 --> 00:11:27.500
The course offers a course, Political Science 61, called, Taking Mark Seriously.

133
00:11:27.500 --> 00:11:31.820
That sounds a little bit on the defensive, doesn't it?

134
00:11:31.820 --> 00:11:35.840
Now if you're fortunate enough to be a student at Oberlin College in Ohio, you can sign up

135
00:11:35.840 --> 00:11:41.500
for Religion 343, Feminist Critique and Reconstruction of the Christian Tradition.

136
00:11:41.500 --> 00:11:46.700
Let me read you the course description, quote, an exploration into some significant contributions

137
00:11:46.700 --> 00:11:51.280
of feminist thinkers challenging traditional paradigms in Christian thought.

138
00:11:51.280 --> 00:11:56.160
This seminar will examine a range of feminist positions from those who see Christianity

139
00:11:56.160 --> 00:12:02.440
and feminism as mutually antagonistic worldviews to those who see feminism as vital therapy

140
00:12:02.440 --> 00:12:05.440
for Christianity.

141
00:12:05.440 --> 00:12:10.720
Issues to be discussed will include patriarchy in the Bible, gender and language about God,

142
00:12:10.720 --> 00:12:15.200
women's experience as a source for doing theology, and the impact of racial and ethnic

143
00:12:15.200 --> 00:12:19.320
pluralism on constructive feminist Christian thought.

144
00:12:19.320 --> 00:12:23.080
Not being widely read in constructive feminist Christian thought, I can't tell you exactly

145
00:12:23.080 --> 00:12:24.080
what that would be.

146
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:27.840
I'm sure it will be good.

147
00:12:27.840 --> 00:12:32.800
Now for you men in the audience, just so you don't think you're being left out, Brown has

148
00:12:32.800 --> 00:12:37.880
a course called Modern Culture and Media 163C, Iron Johns.

149
00:12:37.880 --> 00:12:40.360
That's the course title, Iron Johns.

150
00:12:40.360 --> 00:12:47.200
Quote, an exploration of recent and contemporary theories and debates about the nature of masculinity,

151
00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:52.560
Its relationship to power, pain, and violence, as well as to reformist conceptualizations

152
00:12:52.560 --> 00:12:58.040
of the dilemmas of maleness, patriarchal, and male-dominated cultures.

153
00:12:58.040 --> 00:13:02.800
The course attempts to conceptualize the relationship of masculinity to notions of health and deviance

154
00:13:02.800 --> 00:13:06.760
which have been normalized in the medical model of Western culture, especially with

155
00:13:06.760 --> 00:13:13.080
regard to the practices of medical psychiatry and alternative psychodramatic practices.

156
00:13:13.080 --> 00:13:15.320
Texts from both print and visual media.

157
00:13:15.320 --> 00:13:23.480
Moms, dads, grandmas, grandpas, this is what your kids are taking in college.

158
00:13:23.480 --> 00:13:29.200
One of my favorites is a course at the University of Colorado called Mathematics 2380-3, Mathematics

159
00:13:29.200 --> 00:13:30.760
for the Environment.

160
00:13:30.760 --> 00:13:37.440
Quote, an interdisciplinary course where analysis of real phenomena such as acid rain, population

161
00:13:37.440 --> 00:13:45.000
growth and roadkill rabbits in Nevada leads to consideration of certain concepts in mathematics.

162
00:13:45.000 --> 00:14:05.000
As Professor Hoppe can elaborate on the roadkill rabbits in Nevada, of course, I could go on for hours reading these, and there are plenty more, and you'd get a kick out of it, of course, it's so funny that it's really quite sad, and it has major consequences, serious consequences.

163
00:14:05.000 --> 00:14:15.000
The basic consequence of this type of study is that it ultimately leads to the loss of the foundations for Western society, the loss of the foundations for liberty.

164
00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:25.000
Mises has a wonderful article published in 1950 called The Idea of Liberty is Western, and it appears in the collection Money Method and the Market Process, which I think I saw back at the book table.

165
00:14:25.000 --> 00:14:31.720
and Mises argues there that the unique source of the concept of liberty and the

166
00:14:31.720 --> 00:14:36.040
concept of the limited state is in what we generally call the Western or the

167
00:14:36.040 --> 00:14:40.480
Judeo-Christian tradition, tradition based on Hebrew, Greek and Roman

168
00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:46.320
civilization. Mises notes that even tyrants are aware of the importance of

169
00:14:46.320 --> 00:14:52.040
this foundation and they work to stamp it out. Mises discusses how even in

170
00:14:52.040 --> 00:14:57.640
In Bismarck's day in Germany, their efforts were already underway to eliminate the study

171
00:14:57.640 --> 00:15:02.280
of the classics from German secondary schools. Mises says, quote, the passionate endeavors

172
00:15:02.280 --> 00:15:06.840
to eliminate the classical studies from the curriculum of the liberal education, and thus

173
00:15:06.840 --> 00:15:11.360
virtually to destroy its very character, were one of the major manifestations of the revival

174
00:15:11.360 --> 00:15:18.640
of the survival ideology in Germany. And of course, things are much worse than that today.

175
00:15:18.640 --> 00:15:22.920
As Keynes so famously put it, the ideas of economists and political philosophers, both

176
00:15:22.920 --> 00:15:27.280
when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood.

177
00:15:27.280 --> 00:15:30.480
Indeed, the world is ruled by little else.

178
00:15:30.480 --> 00:15:34.180
Now today, it's not the ideas of economists and political philosophers we need to be as

179
00:15:34.180 --> 00:15:35.180
worried about.

180
00:15:35.180 --> 00:15:40.080
It's the ideas of literary theorists, critical legal scholars, New Age philosophers, and

181
00:15:40.080 --> 00:15:41.080
their ilk.

182
00:15:41.080 --> 00:15:50.080
Now what happens is the ideas of these new age philosophers make their way into the general curriculum,

183
00:15:50.080 --> 00:15:54.080
giving us courses like the ones I alluded to.

184
00:15:54.080 --> 00:16:01.080
These courses make their way down to the education schools where future teachers are trained,

185
00:16:01.080 --> 00:16:08.080
and thus these ideas make it down all the way to secondary schools so children can be brainwashed at an early age.

186
00:16:08.080 --> 00:16:13.480
Just to give you one particular manifestation, it's increasingly true on university campuses,

187
00:16:13.480 --> 00:16:19.200
and this applies to religious schools as well as secular universities, that orthodox theism,

188
00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:24.080
whether Jewish or Christian, is increasingly considered an illegitimate worldview for

189
00:16:24.080 --> 00:16:27.080
an intellectual to take, to have.

190
00:16:27.080 --> 00:16:32.940
The only acceptable worldviews are either pure philosophical naturalism or a kind of

191
00:16:32.940 --> 00:16:45.940
primitive pantheism of the kind that Carl Sagan talks about when he makes his metaphysical ramblings about the cosmos and our place in the cosmos.

192
00:16:45.940 --> 00:16:51.940
There's a practical manifestation of this new age pantheism and that's of course the modern environmental movement.

193
00:16:51.940 --> 00:17:00.940
God and the forest are one, therefore you wouldn't want to cut out a part of God by cutting down a tree.

194
00:17:00.940 --> 00:17:04.540
So these things have very real practical significance.

195
00:17:04.540 --> 00:17:06.860
Now, I promised that I wouldn't dwell only on the bad news,

196
00:17:06.860 --> 00:17:08.540
but would also tell you some good news,

197
00:17:08.540 --> 00:17:10.420
and I'd like to do that.

198
00:17:10.420 --> 00:17:13.140
There are, I think, at least two silver linings

199
00:17:13.140 --> 00:17:16.820
to this dark cloud of preposterousness.

200
00:17:16.820 --> 00:17:19.540
The first silver lining is that these currently fashionable

201
00:17:19.540 --> 00:17:23.900
approaches I've outlined are so ridiculous

202
00:17:23.900 --> 00:17:27.620
that people outside the academy are beginning to notice.

203
00:17:27.620 --> 00:17:30.460
The second silver lining, which I'll come to in just a moment,

204
00:17:30.460 --> 00:17:37.100
is that the modern university itself is beginning to lose some of its influence and importance.

205
00:17:37.100 --> 00:17:43.980
Now what about this increasingly apparent silliness? Well, you all know about political correctness

206
00:17:43.980 --> 00:17:51.180
and how PC has become the butt of jokes in much of popular culture lately at talk shows.

207
00:17:51.180 --> 00:17:56.100
Everyone has their own favorite list of ridiculous politically correct terms. Of course I've

208
00:17:56.100 --> 00:18:10.100
No sir, those hooligans who vandalized your store were not looters, those were non-traditional shoppers.

209
00:18:10.100 --> 00:18:20.100
Yes, back in the 70s I used to have a pet rock, but now I have a companion mineral.

210
00:18:20.100 --> 00:18:27.620
Now, it's okay for me to make fun of these because I have my own special characteristic.

211
00:18:27.620 --> 00:18:35.020
I'm tolerance-challenged.

212
00:18:35.020 --> 00:18:40.140
Now in academic circles, we're even beginning to see a few courageous individuals stating

213
00:18:40.140 --> 00:18:46.580
publicly that this is all a sham, that the emperor has no clothes.

214
00:18:46.580 --> 00:18:51.140
Consider the famous Alan Sokol incident from last summer. You may have read about this

215
00:18:51.140 --> 00:18:56.540
in the papers. Alan Sokol is a young physicist at New York University, and he wrote an article

216
00:18:56.540 --> 00:19:06.340
called, quote, transgressing the boundaries toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum

217
00:19:06.340 --> 00:19:13.260
gravity. And he submitted this article to a trendy left-wing journal called Social Text.

218
00:19:13.260 --> 00:19:18.760
In this article, Sokol argues for a connection between quantum physics and radical politics.

219
00:19:18.760 --> 00:19:23.580
He calls for, quote, a liberatory postmodern science, quote.

220
00:19:23.580 --> 00:19:28.480
And he argues that, quote, physical reality, no less than social reality, is at bottom

221
00:19:28.480 --> 00:19:32.220
a social and linguistic concept, close quote.

222
00:19:32.220 --> 00:19:36.740
Naturally, this article was snapped up and published in a special issue of social text.

223
00:19:36.740 --> 00:19:42.540
Now, the very same day that the article appeared, Sokol revealed that the whole thing had been

224
00:19:42.540 --> 00:19:48.140
and hoax. He had made it up. He had made the article up completely. He submitted it to

225
00:19:48.140 --> 00:19:52.420
this journal Social Text, he said, to see whether, quote, a leading North American journal

226
00:19:52.420 --> 00:19:57.660
of cultural studies would publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if, A, it sounded

227
00:19:57.660 --> 00:20:02.940
good and, B, it flattered the editor's ideological preconceptions, which, of course, this article

228
00:20:02.940 --> 00:20:03.940
did.

229
00:20:03.940 --> 00:20:10.180
Now, the Marxist editors of the journal, along with their guru, the notorious Stanley Fish,

230
00:20:10.180 --> 00:20:15.740
who's Duke University Press publishes social text, reacted predictably, that they attacked

231
00:20:15.740 --> 00:20:22.180
Sokol viciously for academic dishonesty. Now, whatever you think of Sokol's motives, the

232
00:20:22.180 --> 00:20:26.320
plain and simple fact is that the editors of this journal could not distinguish this

233
00:20:26.320 --> 00:20:35.620
made up nonsense from the sort of nonsense that they normally publish. For example, appearing

234
00:20:35.620 --> 00:20:40.240
Something in the same issue of social text as Sokol's article was an article by a Harvard

235
00:20:40.240 --> 00:20:48.660
biologist Ruth Hubbard called Gender and Genitals, Constructs of Sex and Gender.

236
00:20:48.660 --> 00:20:53.720
In this article, Hubbard argues, quote, the time is right for physicians and scientists

237
00:20:53.720 --> 00:20:59.200
also to remove their binary spectacles and rather than explore what it means to be male

238
00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:04.780
or female, look into what it means to be neither or both, which is what most of us are.

239
00:21:04.780 --> 00:21:15.140
On the whole, this incident was a huge embarrassment for the academic left, a wonderful thing.

240
00:21:15.140 --> 00:21:20.040
Now my second silver lining is that the universities in general are beginning to lose a little

241
00:21:20.040 --> 00:21:23.980
bit of their relevance in society.

242
00:21:23.980 --> 00:21:28.820
Quite a number of commentators from various perspectives are arguing that the modern university

243
00:21:28.820 --> 00:21:31.100
is in a state of crisis.

244
00:21:31.100 --> 00:21:37.100
One thing is simply cost. A private university annual tuition fees room and board can cost

245
00:21:37.100 --> 00:21:44.820
up to $30,000. Public universities are facing increasing budget scrutiny. Cutbacks, downsizing

246
00:21:44.820 --> 00:21:50.260
and reorganization all loom on the horizon for major institutions. Now this wouldn't

247
00:21:50.260 --> 00:21:55.060
be so bad if it were perceived that the quality of the education were improving, but of course

248
00:21:55.060 --> 00:22:00.300
the reverse is true. Students are increasingly dissatisfied with large classes in different

249
00:22:00.300 --> 00:22:05.820
Poor instructors, poor facilities, poor safety on campus, and so on.

250
00:22:05.820 --> 00:22:08.660
Alumni loyalty is on the decline.

251
00:22:08.660 --> 00:22:10.940
Alumni giving is falling.

252
00:22:10.940 --> 00:22:14.140
Students increasingly transfer from one institution to the next.

253
00:22:14.140 --> 00:22:20.660
Now, of course, the university itself dates back to medieval times, but the modern university,

254
00:22:20.660 --> 00:22:25.540
this thing that we think of with a huge campus and complexes of buildings, classrooms, dorms,

255
00:22:25.540 --> 00:22:30.140
offices, and so on, is really only about 100 to 150 years old.

256
00:22:30.140 --> 00:22:35.060
But the simple fact is that these institutions, from the perspective of economic efficiency,

257
00:22:35.060 --> 00:22:41.900
are too large. They're just too big. They need to be scaled back. In all likeliness,

258
00:22:41.900 --> 00:22:47.540
the University of the future will be radically downsized and decentralized.

259
00:22:47.540 --> 00:22:51.700
Now already a lot of intellectual activity in the U.S. takes place not in universities

260
00:22:51.700 --> 00:22:57.620
but in private research organizations and think tanks, such as the Mises Institute.

261
00:22:57.620 --> 00:23:03.820
Top scholars have taken up positions at these kinds of institutions, where they're free

262
00:23:03.820 --> 00:23:09.620
from these large classes of indifferent students, the politicized curricula, the endless committee

263
00:23:09.620 --> 00:23:14.700
meetings, the mandatory sensitivity training seminars, and these sorts of things.

264
00:23:14.700 --> 00:23:20.740
I can tell you that both Jeff Herbner and myself spent the 1994-95 academic year as

265
00:23:20.740 --> 00:23:23.660
visiting scholars in residence at the Mises Institute in Auburn.

266
00:23:23.660 --> 00:23:36.660
The New York University psychologist Paul Vitz has written on these issues about the future of the university.

267
00:23:36.660 --> 00:23:38.660
As he puts it, quote,

268
00:23:38.660 --> 00:23:44.660
When universities fail to provide a decent environment for their original major functions, i.e. research and teaching,

269
00:23:44.660 --> 00:23:46.660
other institutions come along to replace them.

270
00:23:46.660 --> 00:23:52.660
The result is the development of a large intellectual community which no longer has any vested interest in the universities.

271
00:23:52.660 --> 00:24:00.660
At the same time, increasing numbers of students are uninterested in pursuing a higher education at one of these institutions.

272
00:24:00.660 --> 00:24:05.660
For example, the popularity of homeschooling is at an all-time high.

273
00:24:05.660 --> 00:24:11.660
Now think what kind of educational environment homeschooled kids are used to and expect.

274
00:24:11.660 --> 00:24:16.900
Act, personal attention, a serious curriculum, etc. They're certainly not going to find

275
00:24:16.900 --> 00:24:23.140
those things at most major universities. I believe that these students will begin and

276
00:24:23.140 --> 00:24:29.860
already are beginning to look for alternative models of higher education. They're going

277
00:24:29.860 --> 00:24:37.180
to specialize programs like the Mises University. They may be taking classes on video, classes

278
00:24:37.180 --> 00:24:54.180
To conclude, what should we do? What should our strategy be to deal with these problems?

279
00:24:54.180 --> 00:25:02.180
I suggest a two-pronged strategy. First, we have to continue to attack the academic left.

280
00:25:02.180 --> 00:25:05.580
Now, the easiest way to do this, of course, is merely to expose them.

281
00:25:05.580 --> 00:25:09.700
And I think that's the bottom line of the so-called incident.

282
00:25:09.700 --> 00:25:13.140
We have to encourage alumni, for example, to withhold their support as long as these

283
00:25:13.140 --> 00:25:16.260
kinds of shenanigans go on.

284
00:25:16.260 --> 00:25:21.700
Lew mentioned last night that a government that is laughed at cannot survive, and I think

285
00:25:21.700 --> 00:25:25.620
the same applies to an academic movement as well.

286
00:25:25.620 --> 00:25:32.340
Much like the Fed, these trendy, left-wing, postmodernist movements are surrounded with

287
00:25:32.340 --> 00:25:37.080
an aura of mystery that gives them a certain legitimacy and we've got to continue to expose

288
00:25:37.080 --> 00:25:43.860
them to show the sham that they really are.

289
00:25:43.860 --> 00:25:50.100
Second, we should work to continue to develop alternative educational institutions and private

290
00:25:50.100 --> 00:25:54.680
organizations much like the Mises Institute to support special educational programs like

291
00:25:54.680 --> 00:26:01.520
at Mises University, the Review of Austrian Economics, books, journals, programs to appeal

292
00:26:01.520 --> 00:26:05.120
to the current generation and future generations of students.

293
00:26:05.120 --> 00:26:10.880
By doing so, eventually, we can restore some rationality to higher education.

294
00:26:10.880 --> 00:26:17.760
Ultimately, we can reestablish the Western tradition as a central part of educational

295
00:26:17.760 --> 00:26:18.760
philosophy.

296
00:26:18.760 --> 00:26:27.760
Now, this is a long-term strategy, to be sure, but I think it's the only one that ultimately will restore our liberties. Thank you.
