WEBVTT

NOTE Why the Fed Got Birthed

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
I want to tell you, I'm so glad to be here. It's good to be around like-minded people.

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:10.000
I met many of you yesterday, last night when I got in, and I'm talking to many of you.

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:16.000
I'm around people that I can talk about the Fed, and people like nod and agree.

4
00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:22.000
That doesn't happen to me very often. I mean, I work in a university,

5
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:29.000
and I'll tell you a lot of my colleagues operate on a different plane than I operate on.

6
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:31.800
We kind of look at the world differently.

7
00:00:31.800 --> 00:00:37.600
For instance, they accept the Fed as a given, as basically as a force for good.

8
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:45.600
That's what all the Fed-funded monetary theories that they study tell them.

9
00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:48.000
That's what that implies.

10
00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:55.000
Now, as a result, my colleagues are very mystified today by a popular movement

11
00:00:55.000 --> 00:01:00.200
that blames the Fed for the financial crisis of today.

12
00:01:00.200 --> 00:01:06.000
I can assure you that academics on the left and on the right accept the idea that whatever economic growth

13
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:13.300
that's occurred in the US since 1913 has happened because of sound central banking institutions.

14
00:01:13.300 --> 00:01:19.100
There's a general understanding that whatever it is, they consider to be important functions of government.

15
00:01:19.100 --> 00:01:33.060
War and Military Empire, putting a man on Mars, subsidizing industries, harassing General Motors' competitors,

16
00:01:33.060 --> 00:01:38.420
rebuilding Haiti for the nth time, fill in the blank.

17
00:01:38.420 --> 00:01:44.540
All these things would be much more difficult in a world without central banking.

18
00:01:44.540 --> 00:01:57.940
But, I'm with these people now, and I have tenure, ha, ha, ha.

19
00:01:57.940 --> 00:02:06.340
And in these mailroom discussions about current events that mostly test my sports knowledge, which is lacking, I might add,

20
00:02:06.340 --> 00:02:10.340
central banking has come up a lot in the last two years.

21
00:02:10.340 --> 00:02:23.940
Now, the conservative position, the conservative academic position on central banking is that the Fed should simply increase the money supply at a rate of about 3% a year and keep the government-measured inflation rate,

22
00:02:23.940 --> 00:02:34.340
well, not the actual prices we pay for goods and services, but the government-measured inflation rate increasing at a small, positive and predictable range.

23
00:02:34.340 --> 00:02:40.440
The liberal position is that the Fed should inflate a little bit more, so it can also promote social goals,

24
00:02:40.440 --> 00:02:48.040
like increased housing ownership for the poor or other politically preferred groups.

25
00:02:48.040 --> 00:02:53.740
That's the spectrum of allowable discussion about the role of the Fed.

26
00:02:53.740 --> 00:03:03.740
And it's pretty convenient spectrum because it sort of ignores that the primary role of the Fed

27
00:03:03.740 --> 00:03:09.260
has always been to feed a large centralized Leviathan state.

28
00:03:09.260 --> 00:03:11.660
In fact, I sometimes think we shouldn't call it the Fed.

29
00:03:11.660 --> 00:03:19.740
We should call it the feed, because that's what it does.

30
00:03:19.740 --> 00:03:23.860
Now, both the left and the right happen to accept the Bernankean position,

31
00:03:23.860 --> 00:03:28.940
and Bob said the Milton Friedman and Schwartz position on the Depression,

32
00:03:28.940 --> 00:03:32.900
which is basically that the Fed caused it by not inflating enough,

33
00:03:32.900 --> 00:03:39.100
that it's due to the gold supply's fault that the depression went on.

34
00:03:39.100 --> 00:03:44.100
And if you accept this, it means it had absolutely nothing to do with the unprecedented

35
00:03:44.100 --> 00:03:47.600
and egregious interventions in the market system at the time,

36
00:03:47.600 --> 00:03:51.000
in the goods market, the labor market, the capital markets.

37
00:03:51.000 --> 00:03:57.300
To say nothing of the unprecedented rampant corporatism and protectionism

38
00:03:57.300 --> 00:03:59.800
that characterized the 1930s.

39
00:03:59.800 --> 00:04:09.800
None of this had anything, is it possible that any of this had something to do with causing the depression to last on for a decade?

40
00:04:09.800 --> 00:04:13.200
No, it's just that the Fed was not on the ball.

41
00:04:13.200 --> 00:04:18.900
And so I'm told that, I mean, oh, and the penitent Bernanke apologized for this in 2002, right?

42
00:04:18.900 --> 00:04:23.200
He apologized for the Fed's role in causing the depression.

43
00:04:23.200 --> 00:04:28.800
And so we're supposed to believe that, I mean, thank goodness that FDR was there to save capitalism.

44
00:04:28.800 --> 00:04:32.600
and thank goodness we have a better understanding of monetary theory today

45
00:04:32.600 --> 00:04:37.300
so that we'll never have to go through anything like that ever again.

46
00:04:37.300 --> 00:04:40.300
Well, we'll see.

47
00:04:40.300 --> 00:04:48.300
Now, mainstream academics are not bad people, but I think they're rather narrow in their outlook.

48
00:04:48.300 --> 00:04:54.100
I mean, they often teach what's in the, most of them teach what's in the approved textbooks

49
00:04:54.100 --> 00:04:59.460
and then they try to publish in academic journals and that's all they're really concerned about.

50
00:04:59.460 --> 00:05:04.140
I remember reading recently about a tenured professor at a Big Ten University

51
00:05:04.140 --> 00:05:09.660
who admitted after viewing that famous Keynes-Hayek rap video, who's seen that?

52
00:05:09.660 --> 00:05:12.260
All right.

53
00:05:12.260 --> 00:05:15.820
I felt rather hip when I saw it myself.

54
00:05:15.820 --> 00:05:20.380
I understood it.

55
00:05:20.380 --> 00:05:23.820
The four-letter word was gold. It's a dirty word.

56
00:05:23.820 --> 00:05:28.300
Anyway, after viewing the now famous, he had never even heard of Hayek.

57
00:05:28.300 --> 00:05:31.780
The guy's a PhD, he's a Big Ten school, he'd never even heard of Hayek.

58
00:05:31.780 --> 00:05:36.700
I mean, the guy just happened to win the Nobel Prize in 1974.

59
00:05:36.700 --> 00:05:43.100
So you can imagine the responses I get from fellow academics when I tell them that perhaps the Fed itself is the problem,

60
00:05:43.100 --> 00:05:50.180
that it should be abolished, and that we should let the market determine the type and amount of money in circulation.

61
00:05:50.180 --> 00:05:53.460
The responses are blank stares.

62
00:05:53.460 --> 00:05:59.460
The idea just isn't on their radar screens. It's kind of like what Bob said about Scott Sumner, who's a smart guy.

63
00:05:59.460 --> 00:06:04.460
Things like that cannot be inputted into their abstract models.

64
00:06:04.460 --> 00:06:08.460
So it's not a part of their world.

65
00:06:08.460 --> 00:06:15.460
But really, we didn't have central banking for the most part in the United States during the 19th century,

66
00:06:15.460 --> 00:06:21.460
a time that, I mean, overlapped the incredible industrial revolution.

67
00:06:21.460 --> 00:06:25.740
It's not like the absence of central banking isn't tremendous with incredible economic

68
00:06:25.740 --> 00:06:31.180
growth and the alleviation of poverty. One of the cases here is that the absence of central

69
00:06:31.180 --> 00:06:36.980
banking forced political power to be decentralized, which had the effect of making property rights

70
00:06:36.980 --> 00:06:42.820
more secure and therefore more productive in terms of generating wealth. If forever

71
00:06:42.820 --> 00:06:49.460
had similar rates of growth again in the present century, a prerequisite would be the abolishment

72
00:06:49.460 --> 00:06:57.120
of the Fed, among several other things I won't go into right here, but again I receive blank

73
00:06:57.120 --> 00:07:03.100
stares when making these arguments. In academia there's often a disconnect between the theoretical

74
00:07:03.100 --> 00:07:08.700
world and the real world. Sometimes we'll hear the response, yes, but abolishing the

75
00:07:08.700 --> 00:07:15.380
Fed, isn't that like throwing out the baby with the bath water? Ever hear that? Now I'm

76
00:07:15.380 --> 00:07:19.680
I'm glad, because the correct answer to that is yes.

77
00:07:19.680 --> 00:07:24.980
But what if it's Rosemary's baby?

78
00:07:24.980 --> 00:07:29.580
Now if you're below a certain age, that's a Roman Polanski movie

79
00:07:29.580 --> 00:07:32.780
about a pregnant woman played by Mia Farrow

80
00:07:32.780 --> 00:07:35.980
who learns of a satanic coven in New York City

81
00:07:35.980 --> 00:07:39.780
that has nefarious plans for her yet to be born baby.

82
00:07:39.780 --> 00:07:42.680
They want it to be a living devil.

83
00:07:42.680 --> 00:07:45.980
Could such a baby be killed?

84
00:07:45.980 --> 00:07:47.580
Well, we're around that point right now

85
00:07:47.580 --> 00:07:49.500
with the Fed, which is no longer a baby,

86
00:07:49.500 --> 00:07:53.140
and I've long thought about that movie in recent years.

87
00:07:53.140 --> 00:07:56.520
You might say that the Fed is the demon child

88
00:07:56.520 --> 00:07:59.820
of the progressive era.

89
00:07:59.820 --> 00:08:04.100
It was not killed then.

90
00:08:04.100 --> 00:08:07.300
It's lived a long life since.

91
00:08:07.300 --> 00:08:08.840
But there's a natural life cycle

92
00:08:08.840 --> 00:08:25.840
I think. I hope. It's not like I'm an expert on demon children. I remember my daughter when she was two, and I remember some of my students last week.

93
00:08:25.840 --> 00:08:37.840
But we are, after all, discussing the Fed's birth and death. No one's saying we should throw holy water on the Fed governors, although frankly the idea does produce an amusing visual picture.

94
00:08:37.840 --> 00:08:44.840
Simply talking about its demise, planning the idea into the public mind, is having the same effect.

95
00:08:44.840 --> 00:08:49.840
Let me tell you, and especially if you've seen following the news this past week,

96
00:08:49.840 --> 00:08:58.840
the idea is terrifying to those politically well-connected groups in society that benefit from the Fed and its inflation.

97
00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:04.840
That this child would grow up to become a vast inflation machine would have surprised no one at its birth.

98
00:09:04.840 --> 00:09:13.840
That's why many opposed the creation of a national bank, which they wanted to be an American version of the Bank of England following the Revolutionary War.

99
00:09:13.840 --> 00:09:17.840
Let's look at the period leading up to the Fed's birth.

100
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:25.840
Now, the secret of meetings at Jekyll Island and the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 didn't occur in a vacuum.

101
00:09:25.840 --> 00:09:39.840
In fact, I'd argue that the Fed was not born in Jekyll Island at all, but rather was born of an act of Congress in 1913 and that it was previously conceived here and then midwifed through Congress.

102
00:09:39.840 --> 00:09:49.840
I'd add that conceptions can be messy experiences. They're often preceded by a long period of courtship and wooing.

103
00:09:49.840 --> 00:10:07.840
It says a lot about the American people's deep-seated revulsion toward the idea of state-managed monetary systems that it took the political and economic forces that stood to benefit from a central bank several generations before they'd succeed in foisting one on the country.

104
00:10:07.840 --> 00:10:13.840
But that one would be wanted, that a central bank would be wanted, should have been no surprise.

105
00:10:13.840 --> 00:10:18.600
Prize. What government since the beginning of time, and you can go back to ancient Lydia

106
00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:25.480
in the year 600 BC, where the first coins were invented, has not wanted and then used

107
00:10:25.480 --> 00:10:33.960
some monopoly power over the production of money to engage in wealth redistribution.

108
00:10:33.960 --> 00:10:40.960
In that sense, central banking could be the second oldest profession. Although in the

109
00:10:43.840 --> 00:11:07.840
It was well known at the time of the American Revolution that it took generations of unlearning these lessons that allowed the progressives to get away with one of their two destructive acts in 1913.

110
00:11:07.840 --> 00:11:13.840
The other being the passage of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which created the income tax.

111
00:11:13.840 --> 00:11:17.840
Let me tell you, I'm looking forward to our conference on the birth and death of that.

112
00:11:23.840 --> 00:11:31.840
The Caesars did it in Rome to finance the lifestyles of the ruling classes, their wars, and stadiums throughout the known world.

113
00:11:31.840 --> 00:11:43.840
In medieval times, scholastic thinkers, both Catholic and Protestant, railed against the kings who harmed their people by inflating their currencies, thus imposing the regressive tax of higher prices.

114
00:11:43.840 --> 00:12:00.840
One of my favorites was the Spanish Jesuit Juan de Mariana, who invoked the papal bull Coeni Domini, which excommunicated any ruler for raising taxes, to justify excommunicating rulers who debased the currency.

115
00:12:00.840 --> 00:12:10.840
Mariana considered taxes and inflation as equal forms of theft and as an evil that could endanger one's soul.

116
00:12:10.840 --> 00:12:17.840
The King didn't like Mariana's writings and threw the 73-year-old priest in prison for making this argument public.

117
00:12:17.840 --> 00:12:22.840
It's little wonder that Murray Rothbard considered Mariana a Proto-Austrian.

118
00:12:22.840 --> 00:12:29.000
By the way, if you look at the state of the Spanish economy today, the results of its

119
00:12:29.000 --> 00:12:34.440
long attachment to its fiat currency and the results of its long attachment to the fiat

120
00:12:34.440 --> 00:12:40.080
currency, you can see the cost of Spain's neglect of its great scholastic tradition,

121
00:12:40.080 --> 00:12:45.360
which is currently being rejuvenated by its Austrian economists.

122
00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:51.080
Let's fast forward now to the 1780s when the courtship of the present system really began.

123
00:12:51.080 --> 00:12:55.600
Even during the time of the Articles of Confederation, there were efforts to birth an early version

124
00:12:55.600 --> 00:13:01.320
of our demon child, known as the Bank of North America, by the very classes that benefited

125
00:13:01.320 --> 00:13:07.240
from the fiat currency, the continental, during the Revolutionary War. These are classes that

126
00:13:07.240 --> 00:13:12.240
benefit from government spending and in fact only exist because of government spending,

127
00:13:12.240 --> 00:13:18.280
and not due to any special demand for their output in the market. One of the precursors

128
00:13:18.280 --> 00:13:25.280
One of the precursors of classes, or these are the precursors of these classes that benefit from inflation today.

129
00:13:25.280 --> 00:13:31.280
One historian of the period called the Articles of Theor, the Articles of Confederation,

130
00:13:31.280 --> 00:13:38.280
the beginning of the Federal Trough, one of America's most imperishable institutions.

131
00:13:38.280 --> 00:13:45.280
The leader of this class was Robert Morris, a Philadelphia merchant who assumed great power in the Continental Congress

132
00:13:45.280 --> 00:13:50.280
and who was the first leader of the Bank of North America.

133
00:13:50.280 --> 00:13:53.280
When revolutionary war debt rightly depreciated,

134
00:13:53.280 --> 00:13:58.280
Morris agitated for debt holders to be paid at par,

135
00:13:58.280 --> 00:14:03.280
something that immediately enriched those who purchased debt at depreciating values.

136
00:14:03.280 --> 00:14:06.280
Sweet deal, right?

137
00:14:06.280 --> 00:14:10.280
It's not that different from more recent efforts to bail out AIG with TART money

138
00:14:10.280 --> 00:14:20.280
so that Goldman Sachs and others could be reimbursed on par for investments that they made that otherwise would have depreciated with falling housing values.

139
00:14:20.280 --> 00:14:28.280
Government efforts to create a system of privatized profits while socializing losses, what a concept!

140
00:14:28.280 --> 00:14:38.280
And it didn't just begin with the Bush-Obama era, although one is glad to see so many Americans finally are catching on to these schemes.

141
00:14:38.280 --> 00:14:46.080
It's a system that occurs only to the extent that the government can thwart market forces.

142
00:14:46.080 --> 00:14:51.160
After the Constitution was ratified, Morris's protege, Alexander Hamilton, succeeded in

143
00:14:51.160 --> 00:14:55.080
creating the Bank of the United States, which would pick up where the Bank of North America

144
00:14:55.080 --> 00:14:56.200
left off.

145
00:14:56.200 --> 00:14:58.800
This bank was considered controversial from the very beginning.

146
00:14:58.800 --> 00:15:06.000
It was created in 1791, and it was controversial because nowhere in the Constitution allowed

147
00:15:06.000 --> 00:15:36.000
It immediately began inflating to the extent that producer prices rose at a rate of about 12% a year for its first 6 years of existence. Rothbard notes that this inflation financed spending on military programs and interest on existing debt and had the effect of enlarging the number of classes that come to depend on government inflation.

148
00:15:36.000 --> 00:15:44.000
The bond between monetary and foreign policies has roots going back to the very beginning of the nation's founding.

149
00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:50.000
Now, at the time, the federal government was rightly ignored by the rank and file.

150
00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:54.000
It was just not pertinent to their lives.

151
00:15:54.000 --> 00:16:00.000
But the die was cast, the justification for government inflation as being necessary,

152
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:12.000
John Quincy Adams would later say, to go abroad and slay dragons we do not understand in the name of spreading democracy was set.

153
00:16:12.000 --> 00:16:19.000
This was going to happen whether or not citizens were willing to pony up the taxes in order to make it happen.

154
00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:26.000
The result would be, as always, fortunes to be made by those who exist primarily on government spending.

155
00:16:26.000 --> 00:16:33.940
Now I pause here to note the obvious in case it might not be obvious to everyone. Governments

156
00:16:33.940 --> 00:16:41.560
then as well as governments today have to fund themselves through coercion or trickery.

157
00:16:41.560 --> 00:16:48.040
Now coercion can take the form of plunder, but the more sophisticated manner is taxation.

158
00:16:48.040 --> 00:16:53.520
That's why it's a joke on us when the IRS claims to be funded by contributions, which

159
00:16:53.520 --> 00:16:57.320
which is how some of its literature puts it.

160
00:16:57.320 --> 00:17:05.120
Debt is another sophisticated form of coercion, but that's simply a form of future taxation.

161
00:17:05.120 --> 00:17:08.920
Note well that this is an essential characteristic of states.

162
00:17:08.920 --> 00:17:12.480
If they weren't financed through force or through the threat of force,

163
00:17:12.480 --> 00:17:19.200
meaning if they were financed solely through voluntary contributions and exchanges,

164
00:17:19.200 --> 00:17:37.800
Trickery is a form of fraud in which governments are indirectly financed by the masses, who

165
00:17:37.800 --> 00:17:41.000
may not notice they are being looted.

166
00:17:41.000 --> 00:17:46.120
When the king clips his coins, thus allowing him to spend more money than he could before,

167
00:17:46.120 --> 00:17:50.780
Or when Bernanke ratchets up bond purchases, thus allowing the government to spend more

168
00:17:50.780 --> 00:17:55.520
than it could before, and increasing bank reserves as well.

169
00:17:55.520 --> 00:18:01.160
The result isn't an increase in wealth, but transfers of wealth, and an eventual increase

170
00:18:01.160 --> 00:18:04.760
in prices, or an upward pressure on prices at least.

171
00:18:04.760 --> 00:18:12.040
So inflation is a form of trickery, and it's preferred by governments for various reasons.

172
00:18:12.040 --> 00:18:18.360
First, when the new money reaches the politically preferred groups, they get to spend it first.

173
00:18:18.360 --> 00:18:21.520
The prices have not yet risen.

174
00:18:21.520 --> 00:18:25.520
They will eventually rise in response to the increase for demands in goods and services

175
00:18:25.520 --> 00:18:29.240
that result simply because the new money is in circulation.

176
00:18:29.240 --> 00:18:34.880
This way, government can grow without risking an immediate political cost.

177
00:18:34.880 --> 00:18:39.920
Second, the rise in prices is equivalent to an increase in taxes.

178
00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:49.920
This form of finance is preferred because people often do not make the connection between the increase in prices and the previous monetary inflations.

179
00:18:49.920 --> 00:18:59.920
In fact, they often blame greedy businesses for raising prices when those businesses are simply raising prices in response to changes in supply and demand conditions.

180
00:18:59.920 --> 00:19:08.920
There's a lag between the increase in prices and the government's inflation that makes their relationship less obvious.

181
00:19:08.920 --> 00:19:12.600
But it was obvious enough at the end of the first Bank of the United States Charter that

182
00:19:12.600 --> 00:19:13.920
it was not renewed.

183
00:19:13.920 --> 00:19:19.400
It took financing the War of 1812 to get a second Bank of the United States Charter,

184
00:19:19.400 --> 00:19:23.080
and it picked up where the previous one left off.

185
00:19:23.080 --> 00:19:30.280
It set in place a boom and bust cycle that ended in what is called the Panic of 1819.

186
00:19:30.280 --> 00:19:36.600
This raised the ire of one of my favorite politicians in American history, a politician

187
00:19:36.600 --> 00:19:43.600
and Farmer, named John Taylor of Caroline. Now, Taylor represented those people who argued

188
00:19:43.600 --> 00:19:50.600
for a United States in the plural, opposed the Constitution, and demanded provisions within

189
00:19:50.600 --> 00:19:56.600
it that would both restrict the Federal Government and nurture, hopefully nurture, a republic.

190
00:19:56.600 --> 00:20:02.600
Okay, so he would have won the CPAC straw poll of 1820.

191
00:20:02.600 --> 00:20:09.600
Needless to say, Taylor opposed the federal government's courtship with central banking

192
00:20:09.600 --> 00:20:14.600
and laid the blame for the 1819 panic directly on the steps of the Bank of the United States.

193
00:20:14.600 --> 00:20:18.600
Now think about how pertinent Taylor's arguments apply to today's debates.

194
00:20:18.600 --> 00:20:25.600
There's really nothing new. This has been a long-running theme in American history if we studied it.

195
00:20:25.600 --> 00:20:33.920
Quote, in also ascribing our distresses to a diminution of bank currency, he's referring

196
00:20:33.920 --> 00:20:40.920
to the post panic credit crunch, and urging it as an evidence of bad policy, we ought

197
00:20:40.920 --> 00:20:46.640
to have foreseen that the history of this fact was understood by the nation. We know

198
00:20:46.640 --> 00:20:51.840
that the increase in the money supply was caused by the expenses of the last war and

199
00:20:51.840 --> 00:20:57.720
and by the influence of the banking bubble to awaken fraudulent speculations and not

200
00:20:57.720 --> 00:21:04.720
by manufacturers. Public expenditures and naivish designs united to produce the banking

201
00:21:04.720 --> 00:21:12.720
bubble, which was urged by the government as a proof of national prosperity. It was

202
00:21:12.720 --> 00:21:18.280
in fact one cause of national and individual distress. It tempted governments to launch

203
00:21:18.280 --> 00:21:23.760
It plunged into an ocean of extravagance and individuals into an ocean of speculation.

204
00:21:23.760 --> 00:21:29.160
It produced a great number of bubbles under the denomination of internal improvements,

205
00:21:29.160 --> 00:21:35.640
having the effect of enriching projectors and undertakers and impoverishing the people.

206
00:21:35.640 --> 00:21:41.060
The bursting of the banking tumor left behind the sores of public extravagance, foolish

207
00:21:41.060 --> 00:21:50.140
English public contracts, excessive taxation and great private debt, all of which it had

208
00:21:50.140 --> 00:21:56.220
generated and these are proposed to be cured by letting them run on and promoting a new

209
00:21:56.220 --> 00:22:05.380
gangrene by a new bubble of granting an enormous new bounty to another set of undertakers.

210
00:22:05.380 --> 00:22:11.700
So what's he describing? He's describing this hair-of-the-dog strategy, which I believe

211
00:22:11.700 --> 00:22:17.980
Hayek accused Keynes of, which is to create a new round of credit expansion, which is

212
00:22:17.980 --> 00:22:23.460
exactly what the powers-that-be are trying to do right now, right?

213
00:22:23.460 --> 00:22:27.340
Taylor later argues that these results could have been predicted given the experience of

214
00:22:27.340 --> 00:22:33.700
revolutionary war finance. He wrote, quote, the local redundancy of money, meaning inflation,

215
00:22:33.700 --> 00:22:38.540
defined to a few persons and factories, meaning these politically well-connected groups that

216
00:22:38.540 --> 00:22:45.380
benefit from the new money, was originally produced and then subsequently increased by

217
00:22:45.380 --> 00:22:52.780
increasing more to transfer than to exchange property. The sudden appreciation of revolutionary

218
00:22:52.780 --> 00:22:58.460
certificates above twenty-fold beyond the value at which they were bought was a transfer

219
00:22:58.460 --> 00:23:22.460
In this acquisition, the majority in no state participated. It was bestowed on the initiated few, skilled in the secrets of legislation, and able to manage its stratagems for their own emolument or benefit.

220
00:23:22.460 --> 00:23:36.460
What Taylor is pointing out is that early on, those who benefit from government spending through inflation will plow a certain amount of their wealth back to Washington to perpetrate political support for the system.

221
00:23:36.460 --> 00:23:43.460
Why have I never seen that circular flow diagram in my macro texts?

222
00:23:43.460 --> 00:23:49.460
These things hardly started with people like Crook Dodd and Barney Frank.

223
00:23:49.460 --> 00:23:56.460
It's ironic that the party of Dodd and Frank began in opposition to these early forays into central banking.

224
00:23:56.460 --> 00:24:02.460
The Democratic Party gained prominence first as being the party that opposed the Bank of the United States.

225
00:24:02.460 --> 00:24:10.460
In the process, it tapped into an anti-state sentiment that was so strong that we wouldn't see another one again until the next century.

226
00:24:10.460 --> 00:24:18.460
Their adversaries were Whig politicians who defended the bank and its ability to grow the government and their personal fortunes at the same time.

227
00:24:18.460 --> 00:24:22.460
at the same time. They were, in fact, quite open about these arrangements.

228
00:24:22.460 --> 00:24:26.460
It was considered standard operating procedure for Whig representatives, for instance,

229
00:24:26.460 --> 00:24:30.460
to receive money or monetary compensation for supporting the bank

230
00:24:30.460 --> 00:24:34.460
when they left Congress. And one Whig congressman, Daniel Webster,

231
00:24:34.460 --> 00:24:38.460
even expected annual payments while in Congress.

232
00:24:38.460 --> 00:24:42.460
Once he complained to the Bank

233
00:24:42.460 --> 00:24:46.460
of the United States President, Nicholas Biddle, that the payments

234
00:24:46.460 --> 00:24:49.900
were being delayed, causing him to complain, quote,

235
00:24:49.900 --> 00:24:54.500
I believe my retainer has not been renewed or refreshed as usual.

236
00:24:54.500 --> 00:25:00.420
It may be wished, or if it be wished, that my relation to the bank should be continued.

237
00:25:00.420 --> 00:25:06.180
It may be well to send me my usual retainer.

238
00:25:06.180 --> 00:25:11.500
No wonder these people are pummeled with canes on the House floor.

239
00:25:11.500 --> 00:25:15.940
It's little wonder that early Democrats garnered such popular support and would demand that

240
00:25:15.940 --> 00:25:21.340
by Andrew Jackson and America's experiment with central banking, Jackson called it, quote,

241
00:25:21.340 --> 00:25:26.820
dangerous to the liberty of the American people because it represented a fantastic centralization

242
00:25:26.820 --> 00:25:32.980
of economic and political power under private control. Hard to believe the guy who said

243
00:25:32.980 --> 00:25:39.620
that is now on the 20. Jackson also said the Bank of the United States was, quote, a vast

244
00:25:39.620 --> 00:25:44.860
electioneering machine and could control the government and change its character. These

245
00:25:44.860 --> 00:25:49.140
These sentiments were echoed by Roger Taney, Jackson's Treasury Secretary, who talked to

246
00:25:49.140 --> 00:25:54.140
the banks, quote, corrupting influence and ability to influence elections.

247
00:25:54.140 --> 00:26:00.420
And the Whigs would get their revenge on Taney later when he was Chief Justice, when Lincoln

248
00:26:00.420 --> 00:26:04.860
had him issued an arrest warrant for him for writing an opinion that he disagreed with.

249
00:26:04.860 --> 00:26:09.260
I think it had to do with habeas corpus.

250
00:26:09.260 --> 00:26:10.940
But the courtship would go on.

251
00:26:10.940 --> 00:26:14.220
These politically well-connected groups that benefited from early central banking would

252
00:26:14.220 --> 00:26:44.220
The Federal Reserve would control the Whig and then the Republican parties, and then they would gain support of the Democratic Party over time, and they would continue to gain off of government finance, especially off of these internal improvements, which is, by the way, the 19th century word for pork. National banking would appear during the Uncivil War, setting in place a banking system in which individual banks would be chartered by the federal government. The government itself would use regulations to encourage bank's inflation and protect them from monetary

253
00:26:44.220 --> 00:26:50.220
The boom and bust cycle, as explained by the Austrian School, became worse and worse leading up to 1913.

254
00:26:50.220 --> 00:26:58.220
Now this is how that happens. Banks issued currency based on an actual supply of goods, usually gold and silver.

255
00:26:58.220 --> 00:27:06.220
Now if they issued currency in direct proportion to their supply of gold and silver, they'd be engaging in what we would call 100% reserve banking

256
00:27:06.220 --> 00:27:09.620
In direct proportion to their supply of gold and silver, they'd be engaging in what we

257
00:27:09.620 --> 00:27:16.060
would call 100% reserve banking and the accounts will then clear. But if they gave into the

258
00:27:16.060 --> 00:27:21.160
temptation to engage in fraud by printing more money in greater proportion than their

259
00:27:21.160 --> 00:27:27.740
supply of gold and silver, then they're engaged in what we call fractional reserve banking.

260
00:27:27.740 --> 00:27:31.840
Now when they did this, there'd be price inflation resulting from an increase of money

261
00:27:31.840 --> 00:27:36.920
on the Market. There is also a redistribution of income and wealth because people are purchasing

262
00:27:36.920 --> 00:27:41.880
goods not in exchange for an existing supply of gold and silver but in exchange now for

263
00:27:41.880 --> 00:27:48.880
nothing. There were increases in economic activity but they are not sustainable because

264
00:27:48.880 --> 00:27:53.160
they are not financed through real saving. When people in the market caught on to such

265
00:27:53.160 --> 00:27:57.560
practices they would demand gold and silver in exchange for their existing supply of the

266
00:27:57.560 --> 00:28:03.560
Inflating Banks Currencies, fraudulent banks can run out of gold and silver completely,

267
00:28:03.560 --> 00:28:08.200
which provides a strong market incentive not to engage in fractional reserve banking.

268
00:28:08.200 --> 00:28:14.360
The fear of bank runs, think of the end of the great money and banking movie, Mary Poppins,

269
00:28:14.360 --> 00:28:17.760
or the great scene in the movie, It's a Wonderful Life.

270
00:28:17.760 --> 00:28:20.740
These were healthy fears.

271
00:28:20.740 --> 00:28:25.320
But with the progressive era spending on war and welfare and with the pressure on banks

272
00:28:25.320 --> 00:28:32.800
Banks to inflate all this activity. The boom and bust cycles grew worse and worse.

273
00:28:32.800 --> 00:28:38.720
One great thing about this period, in my opinion, was that the banks were forced to internalize

274
00:28:38.720 --> 00:28:44.480
their losses. When banks faced runs on their currencies, private financiers would bail

275
00:28:44.480 --> 00:28:48.920
them out, internalizing losses instead of socializing them. Who would have ever thought

276
00:28:48.920 --> 00:28:56.360
Of course, when these losses grew, those financiers would secretly organize to reintroduce central

277
00:28:56.360 --> 00:29:03.360
banking in America, thus engineering an urgent need for a new, quote, lender of last resort.

278
00:29:03.360 --> 00:29:08.600
The meetings here at Jekyll Island marked the time when the courtship led to the Fed's

279
00:29:08.600 --> 00:29:15.320
conception and to what I would consider its actual birth in 1913. This was the implicit

280
00:29:15.320 --> 00:29:20.400
Socialization of the Banking Industry in the United States. People call the Federal Reserve

281
00:29:20.400 --> 00:29:25.240
Act the currency bill because it was to create a bureaucracy that would assume the currency

282
00:29:25.240 --> 00:29:31.840
creating duties of member banks. It was like the Pay Trade Act in that both were centralizing

283
00:29:31.840 --> 00:29:37.040
bills that were written years in advance by people waiting for the appropriate political

284
00:29:37.040 --> 00:29:43.080
environment to introduce them. It was like our current health care bills in which cartelized

285
00:29:43.080 --> 00:29:49.160
Most firms in private industry wrote chunks of the legislation behind closed doors before

286
00:29:49.160 --> 00:29:54.800
they were introduced into Congress.

287
00:29:54.800 --> 00:29:58.880
It is incredible to me that the private banks would be willing to transfer billions of dollars

288
00:29:58.880 --> 00:30:03.280
worth of gold and silver to the newly created Federal Reserve system and then relinquish

289
00:30:03.280 --> 00:30:06.140
their currency-making abilities.

290
00:30:06.140 --> 00:30:09.840
This was justified on the belief not that the government wouldn't inflate, but that

291
00:30:09.840 --> 00:30:16.520
that it would do it better than the banks could and without market penalties.

292
00:30:16.520 --> 00:30:20.520
And of course, Mises would argue that this is just a matter of holding of you would just

293
00:30:20.520 --> 00:30:25.520
hold the banks to the same requirements you hold any other firm operating in the market

294
00:30:25.520 --> 00:30:32.560
that you wouldn't have these problems that they were ostensibly trying to address here

295
00:30:32.560 --> 00:30:34.840
or when they passed the Federal Reserve Act.

296
00:30:34.840 --> 00:30:39.440
Mises would write later this, what's needed to prevent further credit expansion is to

297
00:30:39.440 --> 00:30:45.240
To place the banking business under the general rules of commercial and civil laws, compelling

298
00:30:45.240 --> 00:30:54.240
each individual and firm to fulfill all obligations in full compliance with the terms of contract.

299
00:30:54.240 --> 00:30:56.840
Why not?

300
00:30:56.840 --> 00:31:01.200
The bill passed fairly easily in part because the Democrats had a larger majority in both

301
00:31:01.200 --> 00:31:03.480
houses than they do today.

302
00:31:03.480 --> 00:31:08.760
There were significant differences that were resolved in conference, including the idea

303
00:31:08.760 --> 00:31:18.760
The idea that it only required 40% of the gold supply was necessary to print money.

304
00:31:18.760 --> 00:31:27.760
What that meant was instead of a one-to-one relationship between gold and silver, you had a relationship that was one to 2.5.

305
00:31:27.760 --> 00:31:36.760
Juan de Mariana's days had long passed. No one was excommunicated, much less exercised.

306
00:31:36.760 --> 00:31:41.120
The bill that was drawn up at Jekyll Island was signed by Wilson in the Oval Office shortly

307
00:31:41.120 --> 00:31:45.360
after the Senate approved it. Actually, it was signed hours after the Senate approved

308
00:31:45.360 --> 00:31:52.360
it. This was the real birthing of the Fed, and you can picture the solemn scene as reported

309
00:31:52.360 --> 00:31:59.760
by the New York Times. Quote, In addition to the three gold pens purchased by the President

310
00:31:59.760 --> 00:32:05.240
with which to sign his signature, apparently presidents at this age used to purchase the

311
00:32:05.240 --> 00:32:16.720
Senator Chilton of West Virginia had presented another gold pen, which he asked the president

312
00:32:16.720 --> 00:32:23.520
to use. With Senator Chilton's pen, President Wilson wrote the words, approved, 23 December

313
00:32:23.520 --> 00:32:29.960
1913, remarking as he did so, I'll do the deed first and then I'll have something to

314
00:32:29.960 --> 00:32:38.920
Then he took up one of the plain gold pens and wrote his first name, Woodrow, on it.

315
00:32:38.920 --> 00:32:43.720
With the second of the plain gold pens, he wrote his first syllable of the last name

316
00:32:43.720 --> 00:32:47.000
and finished his signature with the other pen.

317
00:32:47.000 --> 00:32:52.000
I'm using a series of pens, explained the president to the gathering.

318
00:32:52.000 --> 00:32:55.460
I'm sure their jaws all dropped.

319
00:32:55.460 --> 00:33:00.020
In response came the deep voice of Senator James Hamilton Lewis of Illinois.

320
00:33:00.020 --> 00:33:02.700
The bill came forth in installments.

321
00:33:02.700 --> 00:33:07.860
Everybody laughed at this, and there was another laugh when the president, as he reached for

322
00:33:07.860 --> 00:33:13.940
the fourth pen, remarked, I'm drawing on the gold reserve.

323
00:33:13.940 --> 00:33:16.260
Truer words were never spoken.

324
00:33:16.260 --> 00:33:22.440
Again, I come back to what people think will happen in theory, to what actually happens

325
00:33:22.440 --> 00:33:24.340
in the real world.

326
00:33:24.340 --> 00:33:29.300
Federal banks always result in feeding those forces that would centralize and expand the

327
00:33:29.300 --> 00:33:36.020
nation state. The Fed's policies in the 1920s, so well documented by Rothbard, would provoke

328
00:33:36.020 --> 00:33:41.100
the crisis that, in the end, wrenched political power from the cities and state governments

329
00:33:41.100 --> 00:33:48.460
to the swamp land in Washington. People today take seriously the claim that there can be

330
00:33:48.460 --> 00:33:53.540
a viable federal solution to virtually any problem thanks to the money printed up by

331
00:33:53.540 --> 00:34:01.540
by the Fed, while each decade has seen a larger proportion of the population become dependent on its inflation.

332
00:34:01.540 --> 00:34:06.140
The progressives had their demon child who would fuel so many of their plans.

333
00:34:06.140 --> 00:34:13.340
It would remove major financial obstacles to entering the senseless slaughter in Europe a mere three years later.

334
00:34:13.340 --> 00:34:19.740
I'm so glad we are here discussing its death, or at a point in history where we can actually do this.

335
00:34:19.740 --> 00:34:23.740
I don't think the Fed will die of an act of Congress similar to the one that created it.

336
00:34:23.740 --> 00:34:30.740
Yes, I'd like to see it ended amidst a popular Jacksonian or Ron Paulian-like uprising.

337
00:34:30.740 --> 00:34:35.740
But it's more likely that it will die the death of the Interstate Commerce Commission,

338
00:34:35.740 --> 00:34:41.740
slowly, long after being made irrelevant by market forces.

339
00:34:41.740 --> 00:34:46.740
There are life cycles even for demon children.

340
00:34:46.740 --> 00:34:52.940
When this one dies, there will be one less robbing, conniving, secretive institution in the world.

341
00:34:52.940 --> 00:35:00.940
When this happens, believe me, I'll be crying, but they'll be Glenn Beck tears.
