WEBVTT

NOTE The Central Bank Movement Revives, 1906-1910

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
The Central Bank Movement revives, 1906 through 1910.

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:13.000
After the failure of the first drive towards central banking with the defeat of the Fowler Bill in 1902

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:20.000
and the collapse of Secretary Shaw's efforts to use the Treasury as a surrogate central bank,

4
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:24.000
the bank reform forces decided to put their cards on the table

5
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:28.000
and push frankly for a central bank for the United States.

6
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:45.000
The revived campaign was kicked off by fateful speech in January 1906 by the powerful Jacob H. Schiff, head of the Wall Street investment banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Company, before the New York Chamber of Commerce.

7
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:54.000
Schiff complained that the country had needed money in the autumn of 1905 and couldn't obtain it from the Treasury.

8
00:00:54.000 --> 00:01:13.000
An elastic currency for the nation was therefore imperative and Schiff urged the New York Chamber's Committee on Finance to draw up a comprehensive plan for a new modern banking system to provide for an elastic currency.

9
00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:27.000
A Kuhn-Loeb partner and kinsman of Schiff, who had agitated behind the scenes for a central bank, was Paul Moritz Warburg, who had suggested the idea to Schiff as early as 1903.

10
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:41.000
Warburg had emigrated in 1897 from the German investment banking firm of M. M. Warburg and Company, and was devoted to the central banking model that had developed in Germany.

11
00:01:41.000 --> 00:02:05.000
When the Finance Committee of the New York Chamber proved reluctant, Frank A. Vanderlip reported this unwelcome development to his boss, James Stillman, head of the National City Bank, and Stillman suggested that a new five-man special commission be set up by the New York Chamber to report on a plan for currency reform.

12
00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:16.000
The important thing was to secure a commission predisposed to be friendly and Vanderlip managed to secure a commission totally loaded in favor of a central bank.

13
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:28.000
This special commission of the New York Chamber consisted of Vanderlip, a Rockefeller man, Schiff's close friend Isadore Strauss, a director of R.H. Macy and Company,

14
00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:34.320
Company, two Morgan men, Dumont Clark, President of the American Exchange National Bank and

15
00:02:34.320 --> 00:02:41.100
a personal advisor to J.P. Morgan, and our old friend Charles A. Conant, Treasurer of

16
00:02:41.100 --> 00:02:43.240
Morton Trust Company.

17
00:02:43.240 --> 00:02:49.580
The fifth member was John Claflin of H.B. Claflin and Company, a large wholesaling firm

18
00:02:49.580 --> 00:02:54.380
who was a veteran of the Indianapolis Monetary Convention.

19
00:02:54.380 --> 00:02:59.500
Joining on board as Secretary of the New Currency Commission was Vanderlip's friend, Professor

20
00:02:59.500 --> 00:03:04.100
Joseph French Johnson, now of New York University.

21
00:03:04.100 --> 00:03:10.220
The Commission revived the old Indianapolis questionnaire technique, acquiring legitimacy

22
00:03:10.220 --> 00:03:16.100
by sending out a detailed questionnaire on currency to a number of financial leaders.

23
00:03:16.100 --> 00:03:22.700
While Johnson mailed and collated the questionnaires, Conant visited and interviewed the heads of

24
00:03:22.700 --> 00:03:28.900
of the Central Banks of Europe. The Special Commission delivered its currency report to

25
00:03:28.900 --> 00:03:36.900
the New York Chamber in October 1906. To eliminate instability in the danger of an inelastic

26
00:03:36.900 --> 00:03:44.380
currency, the Commission called for the creation of a Central Bank of Issue under the control

27
00:03:44.380 --> 00:03:50.840
of the government. The following January, Paul Warburg went public with his agitation

28
00:03:50.840 --> 00:03:55.480
for a Central Bank, publishing two articles on its behalf.

29
00:03:55.480 --> 00:04:00.880
The big bankers recognized, however, that ever since the defeat of the Fowler Bill,

30
00:04:00.880 --> 00:04:07.280
a prime task would be to convert the large number of small bankers in the nation to the

31
00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:10.760
cause of a central bank.

32
00:04:10.760 --> 00:04:17.080
The panic of 1907 struck in October, the result of an inflation stimulated by Secretary

33
00:04:17.080 --> 00:04:21.680
of the Treasury, Leslie Shaw, in the previous two years.

34
00:04:21.680 --> 00:04:27.600
The panic galvanized the big bankers to put on a concerted pooch for a lender of last

35
00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:31.160
resort in the shape of a central bank.

36
00:04:31.160 --> 00:04:36.000
The big bankers realized that one of the first steps in the march to a central bank was to

37
00:04:36.000 --> 00:04:42.160
win the support of the nation's economist, academics and financial experts.

38
00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:48.120
Fortunately for the reformers, two useful organizations for the mobilization of academics

39
00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:57.320
were near at hand, the American Academy of Political and Social Science, AAPSS of Philadelphia,

40
00:04:57.320 --> 00:05:05.400
and the Academy of Political Science of Columbia University, APS, both of which comprised leading

41
00:05:05.400 --> 00:05:12.880
and corporate, liberal businessmen, financiers and corporate attorneys, as well as academics.

42
00:05:12.880 --> 00:05:17.920
Each of these organizations, along with the American Association for the Advancement of

43
00:05:17.920 --> 00:05:29.280
Science, AAAS, held symposia on monetary affairs during the winter of 1907-1908, and each called

44
00:05:29.280 --> 00:05:32.360
for the establishment of a central bank.

45
00:05:32.360 --> 00:05:39.960
The Columbia Conference was organized by the distinguished Columbia economist E.R.A. Seligman,

46
00:05:39.960 --> 00:05:45.120
who not coincidentally was a member of the family of the prominent Wall Street investment

47
00:05:45.120 --> 00:05:52.440
bank of J.N.W. Seligman and Company. Seligman was grateful that the University was able

48
00:05:52.440 --> 00:05:59.000
to provide a platform for leading bankers and financial journalists to promote a central

49
00:05:59.000 --> 00:06:07.040
Bank, especially because it is proverbially difficult in a democracy to secure a hearing

50
00:06:07.040 --> 00:06:10.520
for the conclusions of experts.

51
00:06:10.520 --> 00:06:15.760
Emphasizing the importance of a central bank at the meetings in addition to Seligman was

52
00:06:15.760 --> 00:06:23.040
National City Bank's Frank Vanderlip, Morgan Chase's National Bank's A. Barton Hepburn

53
00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:27.560
and Kuhn Loeb's Paul M. Warburg.

54
00:06:27.560 --> 00:06:33.120
At the American Academy of Political and Social Science Symposium in Philadelphia, several

55
00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:39.560
leading investment bankers, as well as Comptroller of the Currency, William B. Ridgely, came

56
00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:42.260
out for a central bank.

57
00:06:42.260 --> 00:06:49.840
Members of the AAPSS's Advisory Committee on Currency included Hepburn, Morgan personal

58
00:06:49.840 --> 00:06:56.120
attorney and statesman, Ella Hugh Root, Morgan's long-time personal attorney, Frances Lynn

59
00:06:56.120 --> 00:07:16.120
and J.P. Morgan himself. In the meanwhile, the AAAS Symposium in January 1908 was organized by none other than Charles A. Conant himself, who happened to be chairman of the AAAS's Social and Economic Section that year.

60
00:07:16.120 --> 00:07:35.120
Speakers favoring a central bank included Conan, Columbia economist J.B. Clark, Vanderlip, and Vanderlip's friend, Georgie Roberts, head of the Rockefeller-oriented Commercial National Bank of Chicago, who would later wind up at the National City Bank.

61
00:07:35.120 --> 00:07:45.120
The task of the bank reformers was well summarized by J.R. Duffield, Secretary of the Banker's Publishing Company, in January 1908.

62
00:07:45.120 --> 00:08:01.120
It is recognized generally that before legislation can be had, there must be an educational campaign carried on, first among the bankers and later among commercial organizations, and finally among the people as a whole.

63
00:08:01.120 --> 00:08:07.920
as a whole. During the same month, the legislative lead in banking reform was taken by Senator

64
00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:15.040
Nelson W. Aldrich, Republican, Rhode Island, head of the Senate Finance Committee, and,

65
00:08:15.040 --> 00:08:21.680
as the father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., Rockefeller's man in the U.S. Senate.

66
00:08:21.680 --> 00:08:28.280
Aldrich's Aldrich-of-Reland Act passed Congress that year. Its most prominent provision, the

67
00:08:28.280 --> 00:08:34.000
The Increased Amount of Emergency Currency that National Banks Could Issue

68
00:08:34.000 --> 00:08:40.780
A more important, if widely neglected, provision, however, established a National Monetary Commission

69
00:08:40.780 --> 00:08:48.000
– NMC – that would investigate the currency question and suggest proposals for comprehensive

70
00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:55.320
banking reform. The underlying purpose of the NMC was revealed by two admirers who hailed

71
00:08:55.320 --> 00:08:57.320
This New Proposal

72
00:08:57.320 --> 00:09:03.320
Sarah Ness Pratt of the Wall Street Journal conceded that the real purpose of the NMC

73
00:09:03.320 --> 00:09:11.320
was to swamp the public with supposed expertise, thereby educating them into accepting banking reform.

74
00:09:11.320 --> 00:09:20.320
Pratt pointed out that in no other way can such education be affected more thoroughly and rapidly than by a commission.

75
00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:41.320
Another function of a commission, noted Festus J. Wade, a St. Louis banker and member of the Currency Commission of the American Bankers Association, was to keep the financial issue out of politics and put it squarely in the safe custody of carefully selected experts.

76
00:09:41.320 --> 00:09:47.320
The Indianapolis Monetary Commission was now being recreated on a national scale.

77
00:09:47.320 --> 00:09:54.320
Senator Aldrich lost no time in launching the NMC in June 1908.

78
00:09:54.320 --> 00:09:59.320
The Commission consisted of an equal number of senators and representatives,

79
00:09:59.320 --> 00:10:07.320
but these members of Congress were mere window dressing to the advisors and staff who did the real work of the Commission.

80
00:10:07.320 --> 00:10:14.320
From the beginning, Aldrich envisioned the NMC and the banking reform movement generally

81
00:10:14.320 --> 00:10:21.320
to be run as an alliance of Rockefeller, Morgan and Koon Loeb people. Aldrich chose as the

82
00:10:22.240 --> 00:10:28.720
leading experts advising or joining the commission two men suggested by Morgan leaders. As his

83
00:10:28.720 --> 00:10:35.720
top advisor, Aldrich chose on the suggestion of J.P. Morgan, seconded by Jacob Schiff,

84
00:10:35.720 --> 00:10:42.720
probably the most powerful of the Morgan partners, Henry P. Davison. For leading technical economic

85
00:10:42.720 --> 00:11:12.720
As a political, economic expert and director of research, Aldrich accepted the recommendation of Roosevelt's close friend and fellow Morgan man, Harvard University president, Charles Elliott, who had urged the appointment of Harvard economist, Abram Piet Andrew. Andrew commissioned and supervised numerous reports and studies on all relevant aspects of banking and finance.

86
00:11:12.720 --> 00:11:18.720
for research, public relations, and adjut prompt for the NMC.

87
00:11:18.720 --> 00:11:26.720
Meanwhile, Aldrich gathered around him inner circles of influential advisors who included Warburg and Vanderlip.

88
00:11:26.720 --> 00:11:35.720
Warburg gathered around him sub-circles who included Irving T. Bush, head of the Currency Committee of the New York Merchants Association,

89
00:11:35.720 --> 00:11:47.720
and Men from the Top Ranks of the American Economic Association, to which Warburg delivered an address advocating central banking in December 1908.

90
00:11:47.720 --> 00:11:56.720
Warburg met and corresponded frequently with leading academic economists who favored banking reform, including Seligman.

91
00:11:56.720 --> 00:12:04.640
David R. Dewey, historian of banking at MIT, long-time secretary-treasurer of the American

92
00:12:04.640 --> 00:12:11.680
Economic Association, and brother of the progressive philosopher and educator John Dewey, Frank

93
00:12:11.680 --> 00:12:19.660
W. Tosik, Irving Fischer of Yale, and Oliver M. W. Sprague, professor of banking at Harvard

94
00:12:19.660 --> 00:12:23.840
of the Morgan-oriented Sprague family.

95
00:12:23.840 --> 00:12:30.040
In the month of September 1909, the reformers accelerated their drive for a central bank

96
00:12:30.040 --> 00:12:36.960
into high gear. Morgan-oriented Chicago banker George M. Reynolds delivered a presidential

97
00:12:36.960 --> 00:12:43.840
address to the American Bankers Association, flatly calling for a central bank for America.

98
00:12:43.840 --> 00:12:51.320
Almost simultaneously, on September 14, President William Howard Taft, speaking in Boston, suggested

99
00:12:51.320 --> 00:12:57.600
Did the country seriously consider a central bank? Taft had been close to the reformers,

100
00:12:57.600 --> 00:13:04.880
especially to his Rockefeller-oriented friend Nelson Aldrich, since 1900. The Wall Street

101
00:13:04.880 --> 00:13:09.800
Journal understood the importance of this public address as removing the subject from

102
00:13:09.800 --> 00:13:17.200
the realm of theory to that of practical politics. One week later, the bank reformers organized

103
00:13:17.200 --> 00:13:23.200
a virtual government bank media complex to drive through a central bank.

104
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:30.340
On September 22, the Wall Street Journal began an unprecedented front-page 14-part series

105
00:13:30.340 --> 00:13:35.180
of editorials entitled A Central Bank of Issue.

106
00:13:35.180 --> 00:13:42.660
These unsigned editorials were actually written by the ubiquitous Charles A. Conant.

107
00:13:42.660 --> 00:13:49.220
from his vantage point as Salaried Chief Propagandist of the U.S. Government's National Monetary

108
00:13:49.220 --> 00:13:51.220
Commission.

109
00:13:51.220 --> 00:13:59.340
Building on his experience in 1898, Conant, aided by Aldrich's secretary, prepared abstracts

110
00:13:59.340 --> 00:14:06.780
of commission materials and distributed them to newspapers in early 1910. J.P. Gavitt,

111
00:14:06.780 --> 00:14:12.860
of the Washington Bureau of the Associated Press was recruited by the NMC to extract

112
00:14:12.860 --> 00:14:21.620
newsy paragraphs for newspaper editors, out-of-commission abstracts, articles and forthcoming books.

113
00:14:21.620 --> 00:14:28.460
And two ostensibly disinterested academic organizations lent their coloration to the

114
00:14:28.460 --> 00:14:36.600
NMC, the Academy of Political Science, publishing a special volume of its proceedings in collaboration

115
00:14:36.600 --> 00:14:44.480
and with the NMC to popularize in the best sense some of the valuable work of the Commission.

116
00:14:44.480 --> 00:14:49.280
In the meanwhile, the Academy of Political and Social Science published its own special

117
00:14:49.280 --> 00:14:57.000
volume in 1910, Banking Problems, introduced by Andrew and including articles by veteran

118
00:14:57.000 --> 00:15:05.560
bank reformers including Johnson, Horace White and Morgan Bankers Trust official Fred I. Kent,

119
00:15:05.560 --> 00:15:11.560
as well as by a number of high officials of Rockefeller's National City Bank of New York.

120
00:15:11.560 --> 00:15:17.560
Meanwhile, Paul M. Warburg capped his lengthy and intensive campaign for a central bank

121
00:15:17.560 --> 00:15:29.560
in a famous speech to the New York YMCA on March 23, 1910 on a United Reserve Bank for the United States.

122
00:15:29.560 --> 00:15:46.560
Warburg outlined the structure of his beloved German Reich Bank, but he was careful to L.A. the fears of Wall Street by insisting that the central bank would not be controlled by Wall Street or any monopolistic interest.

123
00:15:46.560 --> 00:16:01.560
Therefore, Warburg insisted that the new reserve bank must not be called a central bank, and that the Reserve Bank's governing board be chosen by government officials, merchants and bankers.

124
00:16:01.560 --> 00:16:04.560
Bankers, of course, were to dominate the selections.

125
00:16:04.560 --> 00:16:29.560
One of the great cheerleaders for the Warburg Plan and the man who introduced the volume on banking reform featuring Warburg's speech and published by the Academy of Political Science, H.R. Mosse, editor, The Reform of the Currency, New York, 1911, was Kinsman and Seligman Investment Banking family economist, E.R.A. Seligman.

126
00:16:29.560 --> 00:16:54.560
So delighted too with Warburg's speech was the Merchants Association of New York that it distributed 30,000 copies of the speech during the spring of 1910. Warburg had carefully paved the way for this action by the Merchants Association by regularly meeting with the Currency Committee of the Merchants Association since the fall of 1908.

127
00:16:54.560 --> 00:17:02.560
Warburg's efforts were aided by the fact that the resident expert for that committee was Joseph French Johnson.

128
00:17:02.560 --> 00:17:13.560
During the same spring of 1910, the NMC's numerous research volumes on various aspects of banking poured forth onto the market.

129
00:17:13.560 --> 00:17:29.560
The object was to swamp public opinion with a parade of impressive analytic and historical scholarship, all allegedly scientific and value free, but all designed to further the agenda of a central bank.
