WEBVTT

NOTE How 'Mainstream' Economics Miseducates About Money and the Fed

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.320
For many years, for the past half a century or longer, it hasn't just been the Austrians

2
00:00:05.320 --> 00:00:08.880
who have been critical of government intervention.

3
00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:14.520
The University of Chicago became famous in the post-war era as the Chicago School and

4
00:00:14.520 --> 00:00:16.040
Milton Friedman himself.

5
00:00:16.040 --> 00:00:19.480
Most of you, maybe all of you, have heard of Milton Friedman, the young students in

6
00:00:19.480 --> 00:00:20.480
the audience.

7
00:00:20.480 --> 00:00:24.680
If you haven't, look him up and find out who Milton Friedman was, if you have any interest

8
00:00:24.680 --> 00:00:27.040
in economics at all.

9
00:00:27.040 --> 00:00:32.840
And he was a big critic and leader of the Chicago School, and they pretty much criticized

10
00:00:32.840 --> 00:00:40.960
government intervention of all kinds, all kinds of regulatory policy, monetary policy,

11
00:00:40.960 --> 00:00:42.920
as well as the Austrians.

12
00:00:42.920 --> 00:00:48.000
But there was one thing about the Chicago School critics that always sounded kind of

13
00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:52.420
funny to me, and that they would never really call for the abolition of a lot of institutions

14
00:00:52.420 --> 00:00:56.720
like the Fed or antitrust, for example.

15
00:00:56.720 --> 00:01:01.360
Milton was famous for most of his career as being an advocate of something called a monetary

16
00:01:01.360 --> 00:01:02.360
rule.

17
00:01:02.360 --> 00:01:08.080
He thought if the Fed could only allow the money supply to grow at, say, 4% forever,

18
00:01:08.080 --> 00:01:10.400
that would be just keen and peachy.

19
00:01:10.400 --> 00:01:12.160
That would be wonderful.

20
00:01:12.160 --> 00:01:16.880
The Austrians never took that position because inflation is inflation.

21
00:01:16.880 --> 00:01:21.840
It'll create the malinvestment problems that it always creates, even if it's only 4%.

22
00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:28.680
But by the end of his life, Milton understood that this is kind of crazy, because it relies

23
00:01:28.680 --> 00:01:33.320
on a sort of a benevolent despot to enforce the monetary rule.

24
00:01:33.320 --> 00:01:36.560
And we don't have benevolent despots, we have politicians.

25
00:01:36.560 --> 00:01:40.440
And so later in his life, he decided, you know, what have I been doing all these years?

26
00:01:40.440 --> 00:01:44.400
He himself, you know, abandoned that idea.

27
00:01:44.400 --> 00:01:50.780
But still, you didn't see many Chicago people advocating abolition of the Fed altogether

28
00:01:50.780 --> 00:01:53.780
in return to sound money in a gold standard.

29
00:01:53.780 --> 00:01:57.780
And so this whole area of banking, money and banking,

30
00:01:57.780 --> 00:02:01.780
has been the most immune of all the areas of economics

31
00:02:01.780 --> 00:02:04.780
to the critiques by the anti-interventionists,

32
00:02:04.780 --> 00:02:07.780
not by the Austrians, but even by the people

33
00:02:07.780 --> 00:02:10.780
who are known as being critics of government intervention,

34
00:02:10.780 --> 00:02:13.780
like the Chicago School, have really been not nearly

35
00:02:13.780 --> 00:02:15.780
as critical as you would think.

36
00:02:15.780 --> 00:02:19.780
And so I thought I would put together a little survey

37
00:02:19.780 --> 00:02:26.480
of some of the kinds of things that the mainstream says that I think are pretty easy to show are false.

38
00:02:26.480 --> 00:02:31.980
And these are things that are taught primarily to college students, but also the general public.

39
00:02:31.980 --> 00:02:35.180
And by mainstream, I don't mean just the academic world.

40
00:02:35.180 --> 00:02:39.380
I'm going to start talking about the New York Fed, for example.

41
00:02:39.380 --> 00:02:42.580
The Fed publishes a lot of things, a lot of publications.

42
00:02:42.580 --> 00:02:45.380
A lot of these publications are used in classrooms.

43
00:02:45.380 --> 00:02:48.780
A lot of them are the basis for what is written in textbooks

44
00:02:48.780 --> 00:02:51.780
about such things as the founding of the Fed.

45
00:02:51.780 --> 00:02:53.780
And I have here a Fed publication.

46
00:02:53.780 --> 00:02:55.780
It's by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

47
00:02:55.780 --> 00:02:58.780
It's entitled The Founding of the Fed.

48
00:02:58.780 --> 00:03:00.780
And it's sort of, you read this, and I started thinking,

49
00:03:00.780 --> 00:03:03.780
where have I heard this story before?

50
00:03:03.780 --> 00:03:05.780
Oh, yeah, the Immaculate Conception.

51
00:03:05.780 --> 00:03:08.780
That's where I heard about this before.

52
00:03:08.780 --> 00:03:10.780
That's where I heard this same story.

53
00:03:10.780 --> 00:03:12.780
It sounded familiar to me.

54
00:03:12.780 --> 00:03:17.780
And so they start, you know, the Fed wasn't created until 1913,

55
00:03:17.780 --> 00:03:21.460
Where they start at the very beginning of the founding of the first central bank, which

56
00:03:21.460 --> 00:03:25.700
was called the Bank of the United States, 1791.

57
00:03:25.700 --> 00:03:29.420
And here's one of the things that the New York Fed said, and even when I was a college

58
00:03:29.420 --> 00:03:33.340
student I can remember being told the New York Fed is the most important of all the

59
00:03:33.340 --> 00:03:37.060
Fed banks, and we're supposed to remember that.

60
00:03:37.060 --> 00:03:41.580
They're saying this about the first central bank, the bank's charter ran for 20 years,

61
00:03:41.580 --> 00:03:48.080
And when it expired, chaos quickly ensued, brought on by the lack of a central regulating

62
00:03:48.080 --> 00:03:51.400
mechanism over banking and credit.

63
00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:56.880
So what chaos didn't ensue, the War of 1812 ensued, is what ensued.

64
00:03:56.880 --> 00:04:02.960
And so what happened was after the War of 1812, the Bank of the United States was resurrected.

65
00:04:02.960 --> 00:04:09.640
It went back in business in 1817, and it quickly created the Panic of 1819.

66
00:04:09.640 --> 00:04:14.240
That was the title of Murray Rothbard's doctoral dissertation at Columbia, which is also a

67
00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:17.400
book and I think it's online at Mises.org.

68
00:04:17.400 --> 00:04:24.160
And so there wasn't panic, but there was one man who I'm pretty sure was in a panic.

69
00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:25.560
And Rothbard explains this.

70
00:04:25.560 --> 00:04:28.320
So here's where the real panic was.

71
00:04:28.320 --> 00:04:34.400
In his history of money and banking in the United States, Rothbard explains the political

72
00:04:34.400 --> 00:04:39.240
impetus for bringing back the original central bank, the Bank of the United States.

73
00:04:39.240 --> 00:05:03.240
The Second Bank of the United States was pushed through Congress, particularly by Secretary of the Treasury Alexander J. Dallas, a wealthy Philadelphia lawyer and close friend, counsel, and financial associate of Philadelphia merchant and banker Stephen Girard, reputedly one of the two wealthiest men in the country.

74
00:05:03.240 --> 00:05:08.840
Gérard was the largest stockholder of the first Bank of the United States, and during

75
00:05:08.840 --> 00:05:15.400
the War of 1812, Gérard became a very heavy investor in the war debt of the Federal Government.

76
00:05:15.400 --> 00:05:20.600
As a way to unload his public debt, Gérard began to agitate for a new Bank of the United

77
00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:23.920
States that would buy up the debt, and of course it did.

78
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:29.280
So I imagine Gérard was in a panic at the end of the War of 1812 when he thought no

79
00:05:29.280 --> 00:05:32.300
one would buy all this debt that he had purchased.

80
00:05:32.300 --> 00:05:36.620
And so what happened then, well here's what Rothbard writes that the Second Bank of the

81
00:05:36.620 --> 00:05:42.540
United States, quote, launched a spectacular inflation of money and credit and it promptly

82
00:05:42.540 --> 00:05:47.620
created the panic of 1819, the first real depression in American history.

83
00:05:47.620 --> 00:05:52.660
For example, for the first time ever there was large scale unemployment in cities.

84
00:05:52.660 --> 00:05:58.140
Rothbard mentions Philadelphia where there was employment in manufacturing of handicrafts

85
00:05:58.140 --> 00:06:05.140
The US fell from 9,700 people in 1815 to only 2,100 in 1819.

86
00:06:05.140 --> 00:06:09.140
That's quite a drop in employment in a single city.

87
00:06:09.140 --> 00:06:15.140
And so even the first paragraph of this New York Fed publication on the founding of central banking

88
00:06:15.140 --> 00:06:20.140
is totally dubious and really false.

89
00:06:20.140 --> 00:06:23.140
Here's page two of this.

90
00:06:23.140 --> 00:06:24.140
They go on.

91
00:06:24.140 --> 00:06:26.140
This is a historical chronology.

92
00:06:26.140 --> 00:06:30.140
They say, America's central banking was carried on...

93
00:06:30.140 --> 00:06:33.140
Well, let me interject, interrupt myself.

94
00:06:33.140 --> 00:06:41.140
They go on to talk about the second bank of the United States and how Andrew Jackson actually vetoed the rechartering of it in the 1830s.

95
00:06:41.140 --> 00:06:44.140
So the second bank of the United States went out of business also.

96
00:06:44.140 --> 00:06:48.140
So here we are after that, after the 1830s.

97
00:06:48.140 --> 00:06:50.140
The New York Fed publication says,

98
00:06:50.140 --> 00:06:56.320
America's central banking was then carried on by a myriad of state chartered banks with

99
00:06:56.320 --> 00:06:58.500
no federal regulation.

100
00:06:58.500 --> 00:07:03.420
The difficulties brought about by this lack of a central banking authority hurt the stability

101
00:07:03.420 --> 00:07:05.720
of the American economy.

102
00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:10.060
Bank notes issued by the individual banks varied widely in reliability.

103
00:07:10.060 --> 00:07:11.540
Imagine that.

104
00:07:11.540 --> 00:07:16.740
To its detriment, the American public had again, again opposed the idea of a central

105
00:07:16.740 --> 00:07:18.900
bank, the stupid American public.

106
00:07:18.900 --> 00:07:23.980
And the country's need for such an entity was more apparent than ever before.

107
00:07:23.980 --> 00:07:28.780
And I'll think about this, when I've read this, I thought to myself, well, let's change

108
00:07:28.780 --> 00:07:29.780
the words here.

109
00:07:29.780 --> 00:07:35.780
Instead of bank or central bank, let's put grocery store and see how this sounds.

110
00:07:35.780 --> 00:07:42.340
America's grocery store industry was carried on by a myriad of competing grocery stores

111
00:07:42.340 --> 00:07:44.500
with no federal regulation.

112
00:07:44.500 --> 00:07:49.220
The difficulties brought about by this lack of essential planning authority hurt the stability

113
00:07:49.220 --> 00:07:51.500
of the American economy.

114
00:07:51.500 --> 00:07:57.540
Grocery stores varied widely in reliability, that's supposed to be a bad thing.

115
00:07:57.540 --> 00:08:01.620
To its detriment, the stupid American public had again opposed the idea of a centrally

116
00:08:01.620 --> 00:08:05.320
planned grocery industry and the country's need for such an entity was more apparent

117
00:08:05.320 --> 00:08:06.620
than ever before.

118
00:08:06.620 --> 00:08:11.500
So competition is to be outlawed in money at all times.

119
00:08:11.500 --> 00:08:17.220
We can't allow competition among bankers of all things, that would be a disaster.

120
00:08:17.220 --> 00:08:23.860
And then sort of their pain to monopoly continues, and when they sing the praises of Lincoln's

121
00:08:23.860 --> 00:08:30.660
National Currency Acts of 1863, which quote, sought to add clarity and security to the

122
00:08:30.660 --> 00:08:34.860
banking system, and so that's why it's like the immaculate conception, every time the

123
00:08:34.860 --> 00:08:41.060
government intervenes, it's clarity and security, whereas when there's competition, it's

124
00:08:41.060 --> 00:08:45.500
It's unreliability and chaos and so forth.

125
00:08:45.500 --> 00:08:49.980
These banks were now subject to stringent capital requirements and were required to

126
00:08:49.980 --> 00:08:52.700
collateralize currency notes with what?

127
00:08:52.700 --> 00:08:53.700
With gold?

128
00:08:53.700 --> 00:08:54.700
No.

129
00:08:54.700 --> 00:08:57.980
With holdings of United States government securities.

130
00:08:57.980 --> 00:09:02.100
More oversight and a more robust currency in circulation was the result.

131
00:09:02.100 --> 00:09:07.220
A more robust currency in circulation, yeah, the inflation of the Civil War, that's more

132
00:09:07.220 --> 00:09:10.820
robust currency.

133
00:09:10.820 --> 00:09:16.300
Another thing the Fed always does is every time it advocates a new type of intervention

134
00:09:16.300 --> 00:09:21.260
and that intervention creates bad results, the answer is always, well, we don't have

135
00:09:21.260 --> 00:09:23.420
enough power.

136
00:09:23.420 --> 00:09:27.140
Ben Bernanke is not the first one to say this, that's the problem, there's not enough

137
00:09:27.140 --> 00:09:29.460
power in the hands of the Fed.

138
00:09:29.460 --> 00:09:38.260
Here's what the New York Fed said about this system, the Lincoln regime system, the national

139
00:09:38.260 --> 00:09:43.140
National banking legislation of the 1860s proved inadequate because of the inability

140
00:09:43.140 --> 00:09:47.580
of the banking system to expand or contract currency in circulation.

141
00:09:47.580 --> 00:09:50.460
This led to wild gyrations in the economy.

142
00:09:50.460 --> 00:09:55.780
So there was a nationalization of the money supply, a massive regulation of the banking

143
00:09:55.780 --> 00:10:01.020
system by the federal government, and there's no mention here that there might be cause

144
00:10:01.020 --> 00:10:02.860
and effect there.

145
00:10:02.860 --> 00:10:07.500
The interpretation they give is that, well, the problem was that we don't have enough

146
00:10:07.500 --> 00:10:12.500
Health Power, yes, we greatly expanded our power over money in the 1860s, but not enough.

147
00:10:12.500 --> 00:10:17.420
So it's always the result. It's always what they're pleading for.

148
00:10:17.420 --> 00:10:23.460
And then they go on to explain the creation of the actual Fed, which other people have

149
00:10:23.460 --> 00:10:29.140
discussed here today. But here's the creepiest thing, they say, about the actual Fed being

150
00:10:29.140 --> 00:10:34.540
created. A key event leading to America's financial reform was the election of Woodrow

151
00:10:34.540 --> 00:10:37.780
Woodrow Wilson as president, so that's kind of scary.

152
00:10:37.780 --> 00:10:42.780
We're kind of close to Halloween, so I thought I'd put that in.

153
00:10:42.780 --> 00:10:47.820
That should say something to you if it took someone a creep like Woodrow Wilson to get

154
00:10:47.820 --> 00:10:51.100
the Fed through.

155
00:10:51.100 --> 00:10:56.260
That's one example of what I believe to be miseducation about the history of central

156
00:10:56.260 --> 00:10:57.260
banking.

157
00:10:57.260 --> 00:11:01.660
Anyway, just one little publication, and there are many like this.

158
00:11:01.660 --> 00:11:07.220
Another thing I did is I wrote down some quotes about what some of the better-known economics

159
00:11:07.220 --> 00:11:14.940
textbooks say about the creation of the Fed and the role of the Fed in the money supply.

160
00:11:14.940 --> 00:11:20.900
And to add a little history here, the biggest selling economics textbook in the world by

161
00:11:20.900 --> 00:11:29.060
far from 1948 until about the 1980s was the one by Paul Samuelson, Paul Samuelson's economics.

162
00:11:29.060 --> 00:11:34.020
And then around that time, Samuelson took on a co-author named William Nordhaus.

163
00:11:34.020 --> 00:11:39.220
And so it continued for many years to be published as Samuelson and Nordhaus.

164
00:11:39.220 --> 00:11:45.700
And all during this time, even the competing textbooks were just clones of Samuelson's

165
00:11:45.700 --> 00:11:47.140
book for the most part.

166
00:11:47.140 --> 00:11:49.740
There were a few outliers, there were a few differences.

167
00:11:49.740 --> 00:11:54.500
But for the most part, the big, big sellers that were used to teach hundreds of thousands

168
00:11:54.500 --> 00:12:00.220
of College Students Every Year, or either the point of view of Paul Samuelson or people

169
00:12:00.220 --> 00:12:03.980
who were sort of Paul Samuelson wannabes.

170
00:12:03.980 --> 00:12:11.380
And here's one statement from the 16th edition, 1998, that happened to be in my university

171
00:12:11.380 --> 00:12:12.380
library.

172
00:12:12.380 --> 00:12:16.500
And this is what college students have always been taught.

173
00:12:16.500 --> 00:12:20.460
The Federal Reserve's central goal is low and stable inflation.

174
00:12:20.460 --> 00:12:23.200
Hold your laughter, please.

175
00:12:23.200 --> 00:12:28.800
It also seeks to promote steady growth in national output, low unemployment, and orderly

176
00:12:28.800 --> 00:12:31.700
financial markets.

177
00:12:31.700 --> 00:12:34.960
Think of George Selgin's charts when I'm reading this stuff.

178
00:12:34.960 --> 00:12:39.300
If aggregate demand is excessive and prices are bid up, the Federal Reserve Board may

179
00:12:39.300 --> 00:12:41.660
reduce the growth of the money supply.

180
00:12:41.660 --> 00:12:44.800
That puts the brakes on the economy and reduces price pressures.

181
00:12:44.800 --> 00:12:49.220
And so the economists, mainstream economists, are always making these metaphors, the economy

182
00:12:49.220 --> 00:12:50.220
is like an automobile.

183
00:12:50.220 --> 00:13:02.420
If the economy is sluggish and business languishing, the Fed may consider increasing the money

184
00:13:02.420 --> 00:13:03.500
supply.

185
00:13:03.500 --> 00:13:07.500
That will usually give a boost to aggregate demand and bring down unemployment.

186
00:13:07.500 --> 00:13:09.460
How's it working today?

187
00:13:09.460 --> 00:13:12.460
They've been boosting a lot, haven't they?

188
00:13:12.460 --> 00:13:18.140
Then another quote from Samuelson and Nordhaus, they say, above all, the Federal Reserve is

189
00:13:18.140 --> 00:13:23.500
is an independent agency and the independent is in big black print.

190
00:13:23.500 --> 00:13:29.100
The Fed listens politely but generally chooses the path that thinks best for the country.

191
00:13:29.100 --> 00:13:34.500
And so there's this like godlike people up there who have no, you know, no personal interests

192
00:13:34.500 --> 00:13:35.500
at all.

193
00:13:35.500 --> 00:13:37.820
They listen politely to what the politicians say.

194
00:13:37.820 --> 00:13:42.180
Even the politician named the president who gets to reappoint the chairman of the Fed,

195
00:13:42.180 --> 00:13:45.740
but they'll tell him to get lost if they think he's saying something that they don't approve

196
00:13:45.740 --> 00:13:46.740
of.

197
00:13:46.740 --> 00:13:58.380
The Fed is ultimately concerned with preserving the integrity of our financial institutions

198
00:13:58.380 --> 00:14:02.300
and combating inflation.

199
00:14:02.300 --> 00:14:06.960
Think of that chart that George had up here, I think it was George had the chart of inflation

200
00:14:06.960 --> 00:14:16.280
from 1787, 8% until 1913, and then, you know, the dollar devalued by, you know, down to

201
00:14:16.280 --> 00:14:21.400
three cents of the original value of the dollar from 1913 to today.

202
00:14:21.400 --> 00:14:26.200
And so, you know, as far as the integrity of financial institutions, I couldn't help

203
00:14:26.200 --> 00:14:33.120
– it reminded me of one of my favorite Fed publications.

204
00:14:33.120 --> 00:14:42.040
This one was by the Boston Fed, and this is an example of how the Fed preserves the integrity

205
00:14:42.040 --> 00:14:44.220
of our financial institutions.

206
00:14:44.220 --> 00:14:50.520
This was a publication that the Boston Fed printed up and sent out en masse to mortgage

207
00:14:50.520 --> 00:14:56.780
lenders, not necessarily even the ones that were members of the Federal Reserve system,

208
00:14:56.780 --> 00:15:02.720
just mortgage lenders everywhere, and it's called Closing the Gap, a Guide to Equal

209
00:15:02.720 --> 00:15:10.800
Opportunity Lending, Mortgage Lending. You see there's a gap in lending for houses between

210
00:15:10.800 --> 00:15:15.800
people who can afford a mortgage and people who cannot afford a mortgage. And we need

211
00:15:15.800 --> 00:15:22.680
to close that gap, the Boston Fed is saying. It's online. Go online and just say, Boston

212
00:15:22.680 --> 00:15:29.480
Fed Closing the Gap. You'll find this thing. And the Fed says to all these mortgage lenders,

213
00:15:29.480 --> 00:15:33.440
They say these are just suggestions, just suggestions.

214
00:15:33.440 --> 00:15:38.220
But then they say failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act or Regulation

215
00:15:38.220 --> 00:15:44.060
B can subject a financial institution to civil liability for actual impunitive damages in

216
00:15:44.060 --> 00:15:46.220
individual or class actions.

217
00:15:46.220 --> 00:15:51.120
So they say we're only suggesting this, but it's sort of a gun under the table suggestion,

218
00:15:51.120 --> 00:15:52.120
isn't it?

219
00:15:52.120 --> 00:15:56.380
They threaten massive class action lawsuits if you don't comply.

220
00:15:56.380 --> 00:15:58.660
And so what did closing the gap recommend?

221
00:15:58.660 --> 00:16:01.980
What are the recommendations?

222
00:16:01.980 --> 00:16:06.500
Recommendation number one is ignore traditional measures of creditworthiness when it comes

223
00:16:06.500 --> 00:16:09.540
to minority and low-income consumers.

224
00:16:09.540 --> 00:16:14.060
So that's where the no-doc loans came from.

225
00:16:14.060 --> 00:16:16.260
Don't even give us a pay stub.

226
00:16:16.260 --> 00:16:22.300
Two, traditional ratios of mortgage payments to monthly income can also be ignored.

227
00:16:22.300 --> 00:16:23.300
Don't worry about it.

228
00:16:23.300 --> 00:16:25.100
We need to close the gap.

229
00:16:25.100 --> 00:16:34.100
3. Lack of credit history should not be a factor either. Successful participation in credit counseling is an adequate substitute.

230
00:16:34.100 --> 00:16:43.100
So if you have bad credit, you go to a Fed-appointed counselor, and that is supposed to be a substitute for a good credit rating, according to the Fed.

231
00:16:43.100 --> 00:16:49.100
The fourth word of advice that the Fed gave to mortgage lenders was this,

232
00:16:49.100 --> 00:16:53.100
if a subprime borrower has a property appraisal problem,

233
00:16:53.100 --> 00:16:59.100
then the Fed or Fannie Mae could help to find another experienced appraiser.

234
00:16:59.100 --> 00:17:05.100
I bought and sold quite a few houses in my time, and if I got an appraiser

235
00:17:05.100 --> 00:17:08.100
and I didn't like the number he came up with and found another one,

236
00:17:08.100 --> 00:17:10.100
I'm pretty sure I could get in pretty big trouble,

237
00:17:10.100 --> 00:17:17.100
the Federal Reserve, fiat money, fractional reserve banking, Human Action, Man Economy and State, The Theory of Money and Credit

238
00:17:40.100 --> 00:17:48.540
Another, all during this time that I mentioned that Paul Samuelson's book was so popular,

239
00:17:48.540 --> 00:17:53.900
the second biggest seller during this era, maybe not the whole era, pretty much the 60s

240
00:17:53.900 --> 00:17:58.220
and 70s, was a textbook, a really bad textbook by Campbell McConnell.

241
00:17:58.220 --> 00:18:03.540
And I can remember one of my professors that I went to school with, they call it Virginia

242
00:18:03.540 --> 00:18:07.660
Tech now because they have a decent football team, but it was mostly an engineering school

243
00:18:07.660 --> 00:18:31.020
School, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Virginia Tech, and the same guy who used Human Action

244
00:18:31.020 --> 00:18:36.380
as a textbook in the class I was taking, and that's a memorable thing.

245
00:18:36.380 --> 00:18:44.120
But anyway, just like Samuelson, this book sold and sold and sold, and McConnell sort

246
00:18:44.120 --> 00:18:50.020
of went into semi-retirement and took on a co-author named Stanley Rue, so it's McConnell,

247
00:18:50.020 --> 00:18:54.860
Rue rather, so it's been McConnell and Rue forever, 14th edition.

248
00:18:54.860 --> 00:18:57.900
I'm going to quote the 14th edition.

249
00:18:57.900 --> 00:19:03.240
In the early 20th century, Congress decided that centralization and public control were

250
00:19:03.240 --> 00:19:07.280
essential for an efficient banking system.

251
00:19:07.280 --> 00:19:12.340
Decentralized unregulated banking had fostered inconvenience and confusion of numerous bank

252
00:19:12.340 --> 00:19:14.600
notes being used as currency.

253
00:19:14.600 --> 00:19:19.180
No single entity was charged with creating and implementing a rationally consistent banking

254
00:19:19.180 --> 00:19:20.180
policies.

255
00:19:20.180 --> 00:19:26.580
And again, think of that, just change the word grocery to banking.

256
00:19:26.580 --> 00:19:35.580
Many of these unregulated grocery stores have fostered inconvenience and confusion of numerous grocery stores to choose from, so there's a menu problem.

257
00:19:35.580 --> 00:19:41.580
If you have competition, you're going to have competition. You're not going to have a monopoly by definition.

258
00:19:41.580 --> 00:19:48.580
So they inform students that this is a bad thing, having a central planning authority is what we need.

259
00:19:48.580 --> 00:19:51.580
Then one other quote that I picked from their book about the Fed,

260
00:19:51.580 --> 00:19:58.580
The policies of the central banks follow are designed by the Board of Governors to promote the well-being of the economy as a whole.

261
00:19:58.580 --> 00:20:01.580
It is therefore inconsistent with the profit motive.

262
00:20:01.580 --> 00:20:08.580
How many of you think the bailout of Goldman Sachs is inconsistent with somebody making profits?

263
00:20:08.580 --> 00:20:09.580
Anybody?

264
00:20:09.580 --> 00:20:13.580
So I don't think too many people would think of that.

265
00:20:13.580 --> 00:20:21.580
So that's the kind of stuff college students have been subjected to for many, many years.

266
00:20:21.580 --> 00:20:31.580
A third example of the so-called mainstream miseducating, and I don't mean every single person who considers themselves mainstream and everything,

267
00:20:31.580 --> 00:20:36.580
but these are some prominent examples I'm giving here from these textbooks.

268
00:20:36.580 --> 00:20:48.180
The Wall Street Journal, that's a pretty, most of my friends call it the War Street Journal, or the Regime Street Journal, Wall Street Journal is what most people think of it as.

269
00:20:48.180 --> 00:21:06.180
When the real estate bubble burst and we entered this depression that we're in, they featured an article by John Steele Gordon, who's a very well-known business historian and I've read a lot of his books, I think a lot of them are really good books on all kinds of topics.

270
00:21:06.180 --> 00:21:10.260
He writes a lot, a lot of popular writing.

271
00:21:10.260 --> 00:21:15.460
I even tried to get his book, one of his books, chosen as the one book that all freshmen at

272
00:21:15.460 --> 00:21:17.060
my universities read.

273
00:21:17.060 --> 00:21:18.060
Universities do this.

274
00:21:18.060 --> 00:21:20.140
They pick one book.

275
00:21:20.140 --> 00:21:24.620
But the feminists that were on the committee threw a fit, a screaming fit, because there

276
00:21:24.620 --> 00:21:28.980
weren't enough women in his book on the history of entrepreneurship in there, even though

277
00:21:28.980 --> 00:21:31.740
it was actual real history.

278
00:21:31.740 --> 00:21:33.940
Today it would be different.

279
00:21:33.940 --> 00:21:39.660
If it was entrepreneurship in America in the post-60s, there would be a lot of women in

280
00:21:39.660 --> 00:21:42.060
there, but this was a history book.

281
00:21:42.060 --> 00:21:46.360
But anyway, so I kind of like a lot of what Gordon does, but I was kind of taken aback

282
00:21:46.360 --> 00:21:47.360
at this.

283
00:21:47.360 --> 00:21:53.700
This is one of the first articles that the journal highlighted to explain the causes

284
00:21:53.700 --> 00:21:56.240
of the crisis.

285
00:21:56.240 --> 00:21:58.580
And here's the cause, John Steele Gordon.

286
00:21:58.580 --> 00:22:05.620
He blames the current economic crisis on, quote, the baleful influence of Thomas Jefferson.

287
00:22:05.620 --> 00:22:09.940
So it's Thomas Jefferson's fault that we had this crisis.

288
00:22:09.940 --> 00:22:11.900
So where is he coming from?

289
00:22:11.900 --> 00:22:18.240
He says, well, the purpose of the Fed is, quote, to guard the money supply, regulating

290
00:22:18.240 --> 00:22:19.660
the economy thereby.

291
00:22:19.660 --> 00:22:26.600
And of course, Jefferson was the opponent of Alexander Hamilton, the father of central

292
00:22:26.600 --> 00:22:30.480
Central Banking in America, that's what the Fed itself calls him.

293
00:22:30.480 --> 00:22:34.960
The Fed has, not the New York Fed, but the Fed-Fed has a publication called The History

294
00:22:34.960 --> 00:22:39.120
of Central Banking in America, and they call Hamilton the founding father of Central Banking

295
00:22:39.120 --> 00:22:40.120
in America.

296
00:22:40.120 --> 00:22:46.360
And in this publication, they even say he even sounded like a modern-day Fed chairman.

297
00:22:46.360 --> 00:22:47.840
Hamilton did.

298
00:22:47.840 --> 00:22:53.400
And I've read all of Hamilton's famous reports on economics, and I've read a book on Hamilton,

299
00:22:53.400 --> 00:22:56.520
Hamilton's Curse, and I would agree with that.

300
00:22:56.520 --> 00:23:03.600
It's a lot of what he writes on economics topics is sort of idiotic, impossible to understand,

301
00:23:03.600 --> 00:23:09.840
a jumble of sentences that aren't connected, it sounds just like Alan Greenspan, if you

302
00:23:09.840 --> 00:23:10.840
read this stuff.

303
00:23:10.840 --> 00:23:15.080
I used to tell my students that Greenspan reminded me of my old uncle who had dementia

304
00:23:15.080 --> 00:23:19.760
before he passed away, and I'd go and visit him and he'd talk and talk and talk and it

305
00:23:19.760 --> 00:23:26.720
This sounded just like Alan Greenspan testifying before Congress.

306
00:23:26.720 --> 00:23:31.180
But Jefferson was the mortal enemy of central banking at the very beginning.

307
00:23:31.180 --> 00:23:36.780
He and Hamilton both made the case for and against the bank to George Washington and

308
00:23:36.780 --> 00:23:41.840
George Washington signed the legislation, but it was only because he cut a political

309
00:23:41.840 --> 00:23:47.480
deal and the Federalists promised to move the boundary of Washington, D.C. to be adjacent

310
00:23:47.480 --> 00:23:52.600
to Mount Vernon, George Washington's property in Virginia, if he would sign the bank bill,

311
00:23:52.600 --> 00:23:53.600
which he did.

312
00:23:53.600 --> 00:23:56.160
Okay, he was a politician after all.

313
00:23:56.160 --> 00:24:00.120
You don't get to be the top general if you're not a politician.

314
00:24:00.120 --> 00:24:04.400
And so what else does Gordon say about this?

315
00:24:04.400 --> 00:24:11.480
So his basic point is that this whole tradition, this anti-central banking tradition, started

316
00:24:11.480 --> 00:24:16.320
with Jefferson and plagues us today, plagues us to this day.

317
00:24:16.320 --> 00:24:20.880
And then the real reason for the crisis is that the Fed is not powerful enough.

318
00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:25.960
If only we could get rid of these Jeffersonians and, you know, they hide behind this weird-sounding

319
00:24:25.960 --> 00:24:31.200
guy Ludwig von Mises now, they don't call themselves Jeffersonians anymore.

320
00:24:31.200 --> 00:24:33.040
They might call themselves something else.

321
00:24:33.040 --> 00:24:37.800
But if we didn't have these critics of the Fed, we wouldn't have had this depression,

322
00:24:37.800 --> 00:24:40.320
is the argument in the article.

323
00:24:40.320 --> 00:24:44.320
And on Jefferson, this is a standard line of these people.

324
00:24:44.320 --> 00:24:50.520
He says he hated commerce, he hated banks, and may not have understood the concept of

325
00:24:50.520 --> 00:24:51.520
central banking.

326
00:24:51.520 --> 00:24:54.440
This is nonsense.

327
00:24:54.440 --> 00:24:58.240
What Jefferson was opposed to was mercantilism.

328
00:24:58.240 --> 00:25:04.320
He opposed Hamilton's plan of a bank run by politicians out of the nation's capital that

329
00:25:04.320 --> 00:25:09.520
would spend money on corporate welfare and have protectionist tariffs.

330
00:25:09.520 --> 00:25:10.520
That's what he opposed.

331
00:25:10.520 --> 00:25:12.240
He didn't oppose banking per se.

332
00:25:12.240 --> 00:25:18.640
He opposed the idea of a bank run by politicians and the policies of taxing farmers to subsidize

333
00:25:18.640 --> 00:25:19.640
manufacturers.

334
00:25:19.640 --> 00:25:23.520
That's what he opposed, not manufacturing in general.

335
00:25:23.520 --> 00:25:25.360
Here's what Rothbard says about this.

336
00:25:25.360 --> 00:25:32.160
He said, Jefferson was very precisely in favor of laissez-faire or free market capitalism.

337
00:25:32.160 --> 00:25:35.200
And that was the real argument between Hamilton and Jefferson.

338
00:25:35.200 --> 00:25:40.000
It wasn't really that Jefferson was against factories or industries per se.

339
00:25:40.000 --> 00:25:44.560
What he was against was coerced development, that is, taxing the farmers through tariffs

340
00:25:44.560 --> 00:25:49.880
and subsidies to build up industry artificially, which was essentially the Hamilton program

341
00:25:49.880 --> 00:25:52.560
and also the John Steele Gordon program.

342
00:25:52.560 --> 00:25:54.440
Jefferson was a very learned person.

343
00:25:54.440 --> 00:25:55.440
He read Adam Smith.

344
00:25:55.440 --> 00:25:56.660
He read Ricardo.

345
00:25:56.660 --> 00:26:01.560
He was very familiar with laissez-faire classical economics, and so his economic program was

346
00:26:01.560 --> 00:26:06.760
a very sophisticated application of classical economics to the American scene.

347
00:26:06.760 --> 00:26:11.720
The classicists were also against tariffs, subsidies, and coerced economic development.

348
00:26:11.720 --> 00:26:17.120
The Jeffersonian wing of the Founding Fathers was essentially free market laissez-faire capitalists.

349
00:26:17.120 --> 00:26:21.640
This was from an essay that Murray Rothbard wrote entitled, A Future of Peace and Capitalism

350
00:26:21.640 --> 00:26:24.680
and it's online at Mises.org.

351
00:26:24.680 --> 00:26:31.520
And so Gordon gets it exactly wrong, in fact I was at Monticello just last week, some friends

352
00:26:31.520 --> 00:26:35.040
of mine from the West Coast were here, they'd never been on the East Coast and I promised

353
00:26:35.040 --> 00:26:39.040
and I would take them to Monticello if they ever made it because they were big Jefferson fans.

354
00:26:39.040 --> 00:26:44.040
So we went there and you walk in the front door of those of you who have been to Monticello, Jefferson's home,

355
00:26:44.040 --> 00:26:49.040
the first thing that's there is there's a bust of Turgot, the French finance minister,

356
00:26:49.040 --> 00:26:55.040
and he was a precursor of the Austrian School. His name is on the wall at the Mises Institute,

357
00:26:55.040 --> 00:27:00.040
the name of all the famous Austrians. He's one of them. And Jefferson learned a lot.

358
00:27:00.040 --> 00:27:04.040
The Voltaire and Turgot are right there at the entranceway.

359
00:27:04.040 --> 00:27:08.040
Those are the original marble busts of these two men that are there.

360
00:27:08.040 --> 00:27:12.040
Hamilton, on the other hand, was an ignoramus on economics.

361
00:27:12.040 --> 00:27:16.040
I don't know how he got this reputation. There's Jefferson studying Adam Smith

362
00:27:16.040 --> 00:27:20.040
and David Ricardo and Turgot and the French physiocrats.

363
00:27:20.040 --> 00:27:24.040
Who did Hamilton study? Well, he basically studied the pamphlets written by publicists

364
00:27:24.040 --> 00:27:28.040
for the British mercantilism, basically. And in his

365
00:27:28.040 --> 00:27:35.440
His reports, his famous report on manufacturers, he said such things as international competition

366
00:27:35.440 --> 00:27:40.600
would make prices higher, protectionism would make prices lower.

367
00:27:40.600 --> 00:27:47.000
He said, he advocated banning all imports altogether of things that we could make here

368
00:27:47.000 --> 00:27:51.160
in the United States, so not allowing any competition from any other country for the

369
00:27:51.160 --> 00:27:52.580
things that could be made here.

370
00:27:52.580 --> 00:27:56.100
If we can't raise coffee here, well, let them import coffee.

371
00:27:56.100 --> 00:28:00.780
But if we could make barrels, don't let anybody import barrels or woolen blankets or anything

372
00:28:00.780 --> 00:28:01.780
like that.

373
00:28:01.780 --> 00:28:02.780
So he was...

374
00:28:02.780 --> 00:28:07.780
These are all the arguments of the old 18th century British mercantilists made that were

375
00:28:07.780 --> 00:28:11.580
all debunked by Adam Smith in his famous book, The Wealth of Nations.

376
00:28:11.580 --> 00:28:13.300
But these were Hamilton's arguments.

377
00:28:13.300 --> 00:28:20.220
And so here's the Wall Street Journal in 2008 making the case that the cause of the crisis

378
00:28:20.220 --> 00:28:24.900
is not enough power in the hands of the Fed and it's because of this legacy of Thomas

379
00:28:24.900 --> 00:28:29.660
Thomas Jefferson and his anti-banking, his ignorant anti-banking ideas, but of course

380
00:28:29.660 --> 00:28:34.260
the real ignoramus was Hamilton and people who championed his ideas to this day like

381
00:28:34.260 --> 00:28:36.300
John Steele Gordon.

382
00:28:36.300 --> 00:28:41.100
Another one of Gordon's claims, the Civil War ended monetary chaos when Congress passed

383
00:28:41.100 --> 00:28:43.860
the National Bank Act.

384
00:28:43.860 --> 00:28:45.500
Monetary chaos was ended.

385
00:28:45.500 --> 00:28:52.980
Well, I have a, I brought a little, little quote here on that.

386
00:28:52.980 --> 00:28:54.940
There's been a lot of scholarship on this.

387
00:28:54.940 --> 00:28:58.260
There's just one article here that I'll mention.

388
00:28:58.260 --> 00:29:00.420
So did it end monetary chaos?

389
00:29:00.420 --> 00:29:05.020
That's what the Wall Street Journal readers are informed of by John Steele Gordon.

390
00:29:05.020 --> 00:29:10.580
I'm going to cite an article by, these are three well-known monetary economists, Michael

391
00:29:10.580 --> 00:29:15.700
Bordeaux, Peter Rappaport, and Anna Schwartz, and Anna Schwartz was Milton Friedman's co-author

392
00:29:15.700 --> 00:29:18.940
in their famous Monetary History of the United States.

393
00:29:18.940 --> 00:29:25.540
An article that was published in 1992 of theirs about this period, the post-Civil War era,

394
00:29:25.540 --> 00:29:30.300
the National Banking Acts that John Steele Gordon claims ended monetary chaos.

395
00:29:30.300 --> 00:29:37.540
They say this, the system was characterized by monetary and cyclical instability, poor

396
00:29:37.540 --> 00:29:43.220
banking panics, frequent stock market crashes and other financial disturbances.

397
00:29:43.220 --> 00:29:48.980
So that's not very stable, doesn't sound very stable to me really.

398
00:29:48.980 --> 00:30:01.820
He concludes by saying that what we need is nationalize the financial markets by assuming

399
00:30:01.820 --> 00:30:02.820
stock ownership.

400
00:30:02.820 --> 00:30:08.140
The government should assume stock ownership in banks and appoint the U.S. Treasury Secretary

401
00:30:08.140 --> 00:30:10.940
as essentially a financial dictator.

402
00:30:10.940 --> 00:30:21.100
This he says will take the politics out of banking, I don't know how he gets that, have

403
00:30:21.100 --> 00:30:28.740
a political dictator and that reminds me of, I didn't tell you all of my quotes from academics

404
00:30:28.740 --> 00:30:33.980
but here's, I saved this for the end here because it was related, here's another textbook

405
00:30:33.980 --> 00:30:39.220
that said something like this by Jeffrey Sachs and a co-author, Felipe Lanane I think is

406
00:30:39.220 --> 00:30:44.580
is his last name, macroeconomics and the global economy, and Jeffrey Sachs is pretty popular,

407
00:30:44.580 --> 00:30:49.200
the World Bank sent him all over Eastern and Central Europe to make sure they didn't move

408
00:30:49.200 --> 00:30:53.420
too far in the direction of free markets after the collapse of communism, and so he became

409
00:30:53.420 --> 00:30:58.320
quite the celebrity, but they say this in their book on macroeconomics, in the United

410
00:30:58.320 --> 00:31:03.820
States the Federal Reserve is independent from the rest of the public sector, okay,

411
00:31:03.820 --> 00:31:11.260
When the next sentence says, the Fed chairman is appointed by the president, so how can

412
00:31:11.260 --> 00:31:16.820
you be independent of the public sector if the chairman is appointed by the president?

413
00:31:16.820 --> 00:31:23.740
The final quote, I saved this the best for last, this is a textbook entitled Macroeconomics

414
00:31:23.740 --> 00:31:29.580
by Andrew Abel and Ben Bernanke, and they say, one of Congress's primary motives in

415
00:31:29.580 --> 00:31:34.220
and Establishing the Fed was the hope that a central bank would help eliminate the severe

416
00:31:34.220 --> 00:31:40.220
financial crises that had periodically afflicted the United States before World War I.

417
00:31:40.220 --> 00:31:42.020
Okay, well, that could be true.

418
00:31:42.020 --> 00:31:44.460
They hoped it would eliminate these crises.

419
00:31:44.460 --> 00:31:50.620
And then the second sentence I think is really funny, but maybe you have to be an economist

420
00:31:50.620 --> 00:31:52.140
like me to think this is funny.

421
00:31:52.140 --> 00:31:58.660
The next sentence is, ironically, the most severe financial crisis in U.S. history occurred

422
00:31:58.660 --> 00:32:04.420
in 1930, barely a decade and a half after the creation of the Fed.

423
00:32:04.420 --> 00:32:06.780
How ironic can you be?

424
00:32:06.780 --> 00:32:14.100
So you have these two brilliant MIT-trained PhD economists who don't seem to see any potential

425
00:32:14.100 --> 00:32:19.020
for a connection between the creation of the Fed and the panic that came just a few years

426
00:32:19.020 --> 00:32:20.020
later.

427
00:32:20.020 --> 00:32:24.180
And they're supposed to be experts in econometrics, too, you know, statistical investigation of

428
00:32:24.180 --> 00:32:27.940
cause and effect and all that sort of thing.

429
00:32:27.940 --> 00:32:29.860
But anyway, so I thought that was kind of funny.

430
00:32:29.860 --> 00:32:34.900
They thought it was ironic that the Fed created a crisis, just like the Bank of the United

431
00:32:34.900 --> 00:32:40.300
States created the Panic of 1819, there's a whole history of that.

432
00:32:40.300 --> 00:32:44.820
And they just don't know history.

433
00:32:44.820 --> 00:32:48.220
If you don't play in the same sandbox that people like George Selgin and I play in, you

434
00:32:48.220 --> 00:32:53.920
don't know that like a lot of the economists that you hear about that teach at the universities,

435
00:32:53.920 --> 00:32:57.500
they really don't know anything about this kind of history.

436
00:32:57.500 --> 00:33:02.000
They go to graduate school and are taught a lot of technical stuff, and they read journal

437
00:33:02.000 --> 00:33:08.440
articles, mostly very recent journal articles, and very, very few of them do things like

438
00:33:08.440 --> 00:33:12.320
Murray Rothbard did, write books on the monetary history of the United States.

439
00:33:12.320 --> 00:33:18.000
They only know the latest, you know, couple of years' worth of journal articles and things,

440
00:33:18.000 --> 00:33:20.220
and so they might be totally in the dark.

441
00:33:20.220 --> 00:33:26.660
Even a guy like Ben Bernanke might be totally in the dark about some of these easy-to-read

442
00:33:26.660 --> 00:33:33.900
History there and it sure sounds like it if you read some of the textbooks. Let's

443
00:33:33.900 --> 00:33:38.780
see, how's the time going here? One other thing I'd mention, all this talk about the

444
00:33:38.780 --> 00:33:43.100
independent Fed. I've mentioned a few of these quotes about the Fed is

445
00:33:43.100 --> 00:33:48.980
supposedly independent and if it's not it should be. Well that is not really true.

446
00:33:48.980 --> 00:33:55.100
Another group of dissidents within the economics profession were some of my

447
00:33:55.100 --> 00:34:00.180
Professor at VPI, James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock. They were the founders of what's

448
00:34:00.180 --> 00:34:04.900
called the Public Choice School of Economics. It's basically the economic analysis of political

449
00:34:04.900 --> 00:34:11.420
decision making. And some of this research spilled out into monetary economics over the

450
00:34:11.420 --> 00:34:17.740
past 20, 25 years when some of the people in this field started writing articles in

451
00:34:17.740 --> 00:34:23.900
the academic journals about the influence of politics on the Fed. You know, previously

452
00:34:23.900 --> 00:34:31.900
This was unthinkable. The Fed is independent. You can't have politics in government when it comes to the money supply.

453
00:34:31.900 --> 00:34:40.900
But just to give you an idea of what some of these people have said, there's one person who wasn't really a big shot in public choice,

454
00:34:40.900 --> 00:34:47.900
but he was really an excellent economist, the late Robert Weintraub. In one of his publications,

455
00:34:47.900 --> 00:34:55.280
He wrote how the Federal Reserve fundamentally shifted its monetary policy course in 1953,

456
00:34:55.280 --> 00:34:59.620
1961, 1969, 1974, and 1977.

457
00:34:59.620 --> 00:35:03.540
This is one of the first articles of this type that I know of, looking at sort of the

458
00:35:03.540 --> 00:35:04.940
political influence of the Fed.

459
00:35:04.940 --> 00:35:10.900
Now, why did the Fed make all these shifts from easy money to not so easy money, you

460
00:35:10.900 --> 00:35:13.700
know, every time, every few years?

461
00:35:13.700 --> 00:35:16.260
Well, here's the explanation.

462
00:35:16.260 --> 00:35:22.020
Lyndon Eisenhower wanted slower money growth, the money supply then grew at 1.73% during

463
00:35:22.020 --> 00:35:25.820
his administration, the slowest rate in a decade.

464
00:35:25.820 --> 00:35:29.700
Then President Kennedy desired a somewhat faster money creation.

465
00:35:29.700 --> 00:35:35.500
From January 61 to November 63, the money supply grew by 2.31%.

466
00:35:35.500 --> 00:35:41.420
Lyndon Johnson required rapid money creation to finance his expansion of the Vietnam War

467
00:35:41.420 --> 00:35:42.920
and the welfare state.

468
00:35:42.920 --> 00:35:46.560
Money supply growth more than doubled.

469
00:35:46.560 --> 00:35:51.220
These varying rates of monetary growth all occurred under the same Fed Chairman, William

470
00:35:51.220 --> 00:35:56.300
McChesney Martin, and the story that is told here is that if you want to keep your job

471
00:35:56.300 --> 00:36:00.340
and be reappointed as Fed Chairman, you do what the boss wants, and the boss will let

472
00:36:00.340 --> 00:36:02.180
you know what he wants, the President.

473
00:36:02.180 --> 00:36:06.740
He'll make speeches, he'll have his people, his appointees go out and make speeches about

474
00:36:06.740 --> 00:36:12.540
whether the money is growing too fast or too slow, and you keep your ears open and you

475
00:36:12.540 --> 00:36:37.540
Arthur Burns, the successor, was such a staunch supporter of Nixon that even though his staff informed him in the fall of 1972 that the money supply was forecast to grow by a robust 10.5% in the third quarter, Burns advocated even faster growth.

476
00:36:37.540 --> 00:36:47.540
The growth rate and the money supply in 1972 was the fastest for any one year since the end of World War II and, of course, it helped Nixon get re-elected.

477
00:36:47.540 --> 00:36:56.540
And then, of course, when Jerry Ford came in, he had his Whip Inflation Now program. People were wearing these buttons that said, win.

478
00:36:56.540 --> 00:37:03.540
Just that should make Jerry Ford go down as the dumbest president in American history, I think. Just that button.

479
00:37:03.540 --> 00:37:12.540
But that was the consequence of Nixon's re-election campaign, and in the literature of economics, this is called the political business cycle.

480
00:37:12.540 --> 00:37:18.540
And most of the mainstream economists don't pay much attention to this, they poo-poo it, they say it hasn't been really proven.

481
00:37:18.540 --> 00:37:31.540
Well, yeah, the government doesn't have the ability to perfectly centrally plan the economy to the extent that they can create zero unemployment a month before the election takes place, and then, you know, like that.

482
00:37:31.540 --> 00:37:36.700
like that, but they try their best. They do try their best to inflate before the election

483
00:37:36.700 --> 00:37:43.700
and it creates all kinds of economic problems for the rest of us. And so all this, and this

484
00:37:43.700 --> 00:37:48.540
rarely makes it into the textbooks. Some of them have it, some of them do have it, but

485
00:37:48.540 --> 00:37:54.620
those statements I read to you earlier make no hint of that. So you can very easily get

486
00:37:54.620 --> 00:37:59.340
through a class in macroeconomics at a university or monetary theory and not have any knowledge

487
00:37:59.340 --> 00:38:29.340
I'll tell you this, one of my students came into my American economic history class, undergraduate student, he had already taken, he was an economics major, and he had already taken a class in intermediate macroeconomic theory, which is really the heavy duty, intermediate level course that all majors take, and a course on monetary theory, and he comes into my class and he said, you know, I had no idea there were criticisms of the Fed. He said, I never heard this. He had had all these classes, and he was fascinated that there were actual criticisms.

488
00:38:29.340 --> 00:38:59.340
The man says I have five minutes and so what I'm going to do to close here is I don't want you to be too disappointed that Lew Rockwell had to cancel and that's too bad and so I brought, I'm going to read you a few quotes from Lew on this topic of the Fed and how the mainstream miseducates and how the mainstream miseducates and how the mainstream miseducates and how the mainstream miseducates

489
00:38:59.340 --> 00:39:05.820
What I have to say here is not so much miseducation per se, but they leave a lot out.

490
00:39:05.820 --> 00:39:11.780
From the very beginning, central banks have had as one of their primary purposes the financing

491
00:39:11.780 --> 00:39:17.380
of war, and you will rarely read anything at all about that, about the role of the central

492
00:39:17.380 --> 00:39:21.340
banks financing war in the mainstream theory textbooks.

493
00:39:21.340 --> 00:39:24.540
You'll read about it at the Mises Institute and things like that, but you pick up one

494
00:39:24.540 --> 00:39:29.960
One of these macroeconomics or monetary theory books, and you'll, very little is mentioned

495
00:39:29.960 --> 00:39:37.040
about that, but Lew has written about it very eloquently, and of course, the United States

496
00:39:37.040 --> 00:39:41.980
probably could not have gotten into World War I had we not had the Fed, and the income

497
00:39:41.980 --> 00:39:47.060
tax was created in the same year, by the way, in 1913, and here's what Lew says about it,

498
00:39:47.060 --> 00:39:53.060
he says, when they were making the case for the Fed, no one pointed out, this is a quote,

499
00:39:53.060 --> 00:39:59.140
No one pointed out that this institution would permit Americans to fund, without taxes,

500
00:39:59.140 --> 00:40:03.180
the destruction of cities abroad and overthrow of governments at will.

501
00:40:03.180 --> 00:40:08.080
No one said that the central bank would make it possible for the U.S. to be at large-scale

502
00:40:08.080 --> 00:40:12.300
war in one of every four years for a century.

503
00:40:12.300 --> 00:40:16.580
It was never pointed out that this institution would make it possible for the U.S. government

504
00:40:16.580 --> 00:40:22.820
to establish a global empire that would make imperial Rome and Britain look benign by comparison.

505
00:40:22.820 --> 00:40:28.820
World War I was never mentioned. It was always the chaos of competitive currency that was the problem.

506
00:40:28.820 --> 00:40:37.820
The Fed is the institution that has been required to enter and fund all these wars.

507
00:40:37.820 --> 00:40:45.820
World War I, all the major belligerents used central banking for World War I. It wasn't only just the Fed.

508
00:40:45.820 --> 00:40:49.820
It was the Germans and it was the Russians. The Russians had their central bank. They

509
00:40:49.820 --> 00:40:59.020
all abandoned, walked away from gold and adopted fiat money and centralized banking. And Ludwig

510
00:40:59.020 --> 00:41:05.340
von Mises wrote this in 1919. He said, one can say without exaggeration that inflation

511
00:41:05.340 --> 00:41:12.060
is an indispensable means of militarism. Without it, the repercussions of war on welfare become

512
00:41:12.060 --> 00:41:18.140
from obvious, much more quickly and penetratingly, war-weariness was set in much earlier, and

513
00:41:18.140 --> 00:41:24.260
of course that's certainly true if the government has to tell us today, now, okay, if we want

514
00:41:24.260 --> 00:41:29.820
to maintain these wars in Iran, in Iraq rather, I'm getting ahead of myself, I'm reading

515
00:41:29.820 --> 00:41:36.100
the weekly standard too much in Iraq, all the hopeful thinking in the weekly standard.

516
00:41:36.100 --> 00:41:41.820
Iraq and Afghanistan, well given the cost of these wars, every working American will

517
00:41:41.820 --> 00:41:45.100
will be assessed a new tax of $20,000 this year.

518
00:41:45.100 --> 00:41:49.420
I bet there'd be an anti-war movement in America over that.

519
00:41:49.420 --> 00:41:51.460
But if Ben Bernanke can just push a button

520
00:41:51.460 --> 00:41:55.400
and print all that money and let the consequences befall us

521
00:41:55.400 --> 00:41:57.620
next year, the year after, and so forth,

522
00:41:57.620 --> 00:41:59.660
and then blame it all on capitalism,

523
00:41:59.660 --> 00:42:02.060
well, that's a good scheme, isn't it?

524
00:42:02.060 --> 00:42:04.180
And so this is what happened.

525
00:42:04.180 --> 00:42:07.620
And the Russians, the Germans, by 1923,

526
00:42:07.620 --> 00:42:11.300
the market had fallen to one trillionth of its 1914 value.

527
00:42:11.300 --> 00:42:15.800
That's what they did with their hyperinflation to finance their participation in the war.

528
00:42:15.800 --> 00:42:20.980
In Russia, they had the State Bank of the Russian Empire.

529
00:42:20.980 --> 00:42:23.600
It was the Russian version of the Fed.

530
00:42:23.600 --> 00:42:24.940
And it did the same thing.

531
00:42:24.940 --> 00:42:28.300
It created tremendous, tremendous inflation.

532
00:42:28.300 --> 00:42:32.580
So what Lew concludes in an article is that one of the things that's sort of overlooked

533
00:42:32.580 --> 00:42:39.040
here is that central banking gave birth, I'll quote him, to the most evil political trends

534
00:42:39.040 --> 00:42:44.780
in the History of the World, Communism, Socialism, Fascism, Nazism, and the Despotism of Economic

535
00:42:44.780 --> 00:42:50.200
Planning in the Capitalist West, and you won't read that in these economics textbooks, but

536
00:42:50.200 --> 00:42:55.220
I believe it's absolutely true that that is what has happened, and if you really want

537
00:42:55.220 --> 00:42:59.520
to follow up on this, Joseph Salerno has an excellent article called War and the Money

538
00:42:59.520 --> 00:43:06.780
Machine, and it's in the Mises Institute book on the cost of war, but it's also online,

539
00:43:06.780 --> 00:43:13.340
So if you just go online and type in Joseph P. Salerno in War and the Money Machine, it's

540
00:43:13.340 --> 00:43:17.380
a great exposition of war and inflation.

541
00:43:17.380 --> 00:43:20.100
And so I think my time is about up.

542
00:43:20.100 --> 00:43:22.300
Thank you all for supporting the Mises Institute.

543
00:43:22.300 --> 00:43:26.780
Remember, we won't allow you to exit this room unless you do sign up so that we can

544
00:43:26.780 --> 00:43:30.980
give you one of those books on the presidency, and I will sign them if you ask me to.

545
00:43:30.980 --> 00:43:31.980
Thank you very much.

546
00:43:31.980 --> 00:43:33.980
Thank you very much.
