WEBVTT

NOTE Military as Engine of Social Change

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.000
Describing the military or its object, war, as an engine of social change is a kind of truism, certainly so in our century.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:18.000
It was the poet William Butler Yeats who wrote, amidst the carnage of World War I,

3
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:25.000
All changed, changed utterly. A terrible beauty is born.

4
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:37.000
Another English poet, John Maysfield, made a government-sponsored propaganda lecture tour of the United States in 1918, offering the same judgment.

5
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:47.000
Whatever this war is, he stated, it is a getting rid of the past. The past has gone into the bonfire.

6
00:00:47.000 --> 00:01:08.000
We are all in the war now, he noted, probably with a certain twinkle in his eye, realizing with more or less surprise and shock and bitterness that the old delights, the old ideals, the old way of life, with all its comfortable loves and hatreds, are gone.

7
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:15.000
We have to remake our lives, forget our old hatreds, and learn new ones.

8
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:27.000
The standard argument among historians is that World War II also produced vast social consequences.

9
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:34.000
As Richard Polenberg summarized in his fairly standard volume, War and Society,

10
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:42.000
World War II radically altered the character of American society and challenged its most durable values.

11
00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:49.000
The war redefined the relationship of government to the individual and of individuals to each other.

12
00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:54.000
And it posed questions about the relationship between civilians and the military,

13
00:01:54.000 --> 00:02:00.000
and between liberty and security, which continued to perplex Americans.

14
00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:06.000
He added, Pearl Harbor marked more than the passing of a decade.

15
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:11.000
It signified the end of an old era and the beginning of a new.

16
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:20.000
of the New. Others, however, have argued that vast social changes through modern war are

17
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:26.280
more apparent than real, temporary aberrations that roll back towards a kind of normalcy

18
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:32.480
once the crisis has passed. The British journalist Michael McDonough had that view of the Great

19
00:02:32.480 --> 00:02:38.600
War, concluding, I think no permanent change of importance has been made by the war and

20
00:02:38.600 --> 00:02:44.320
and the character, customs, and habits of the British people.

21
00:02:44.320 --> 00:02:49.840
More recently, feminist historians have made the same argument, or, better put in their

22
00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:53.840
case, complaint.

23
00:02:53.840 --> 00:02:58.840
Dismissing all the stories about Rosie the Riveter and her ilk, these writers argue that

24
00:02:58.840 --> 00:03:05.960
neither World War I nor II produced real, long-term changes in women's lives.

25
00:03:05.960 --> 00:03:11.780
Men were primarily wives and mothers before each of these total wars. Alas, they were

26
00:03:11.780 --> 00:03:18.240
primarily wives and mothers afterwards. As a prominent feminist historian recently put

27
00:03:18.240 --> 00:03:24.880
it, although government propaganda exhorted women to brave, unfamiliar work, these appeals

28
00:03:24.880 --> 00:03:32.880
were contained by nationalist and militarist discourse that reinforced patriarchal, organistic

29
00:03:32.880 --> 00:03:36.480
Notions of Gender Relations.

30
00:03:36.480 --> 00:03:42.400
Sounds like a faculty meeting, I guess, there, doesn't it?

31
00:03:42.400 --> 00:03:46.560
Indeed, I note as an aside that feminist historians

32
00:03:46.560 --> 00:03:51.600
looking at the early 20th century have of late had to go to unusual lengths to

33
00:03:51.600 --> 00:03:54.240
find real heroines.

34
00:03:54.240 --> 00:03:57.760
Some of you, I suspect, are familiar with Rush Limbaugh's term

35
00:03:57.760 --> 00:04:07.400
Feminazis. In truth, there were real feminist nazis in the early German Third Reich, mainly

36
00:04:07.400 --> 00:04:15.680
female professors at several German universities. In 1933, this is a true story, these authentic

37
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:24.040
feminazis prepared an anthology entitled German Women Address Adolf Hitler. Among other novelties

38
00:04:24.040 --> 00:04:41.040
Lisa contained an article by a Nazi paleoanthropologist who claimed to have discovered skeletons in an excavation of Norway, which proved that prehistoric Nordic males and females had been equal in size and strength.

39
00:04:41.040 --> 00:04:51.040
She theorized that Nordic men had subsequently underfed the women, who shrank in stature.

40
00:04:51.040 --> 00:05:00.040
Nazi culture, she told an undoubtedly perplexed Mr. Hitler, could equalize Nordic men and women again.

41
00:05:00.040 --> 00:05:05.040
Fred let us move beyond such ideological exotica.

42
00:05:05.040 --> 00:05:14.040
When one examines the military's role in stimulating government actions or innovations that later became institutionalized,

43
00:05:14.040 --> 00:05:20.040
the effect of war in driving social revolution grows evident.

44
00:05:20.040 --> 00:05:29.200
To choose just a few examples from this century. In 1917, the U.S. Navy distributed the first

45
00:05:29.200 --> 00:05:35.880
official U.S. government condom. Today, of course, the distribution of condoms to the

46
00:05:35.880 --> 00:05:48.960
citizenry is the principal purpose of government. In 1941, the U.S. government opened the first

47
00:05:48.960 --> 00:05:54.800
The first Lanham Act daycare center to tend the children of mothers working in a defense plant,

48
00:05:54.800 --> 00:06:00.480
marking the first real federal intrusion into the care of infants and small children.

49
00:06:00.480 --> 00:06:08.480
A year later, 1942, the US Army extended military health care services for the first time to

50
00:06:08.480 --> 00:06:16.860
civilian dependents, arguably the first step toward the federalization of American medicine.

51
00:06:16.860 --> 00:06:20.240
And there are other stories to tell.

52
00:06:20.240 --> 00:06:25.260
Relative to sexuality, there is little doubt that the world wars of the twentieth century

53
00:06:25.260 --> 00:06:29.700
accelerated the disintegration of inherited sexual mores.

54
00:06:29.700 --> 00:06:37.300
John Costello's so-called Sexual History of World War II, entitled Virtue Under Fire,

55
00:06:37.300 --> 00:06:38.900
carried this theme.

56
00:06:38.900 --> 00:06:44.800
Amidst the upheaval that uprooted so many lives, the cure for loneliness was discovered

57
00:06:44.800 --> 00:06:50.640
and a changing approach to sexual relations as they adapted to a more dangerous and unorthodox

58
00:06:50.640 --> 00:06:53.840
lifestyle.

59
00:06:53.840 --> 00:06:59.760
A more forceful explanation of sexual adventures among the wartime masses is found in a very

60
00:06:59.760 --> 00:07:09.360
peculiar but illuminating book from the early 1970s entitled The Rape of the Ape, Ape being

61
00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:16.760
The American Puritan Ethic, published by the Playboy Press, subtitled The Official History

62
00:07:16.760 --> 00:07:23.240
of the Sex Revolution and written by humorist Alan Sherman, the book opens with a chapter

63
00:07:23.240 --> 00:07:27.840
on World War II as sex education.

64
00:07:27.840 --> 00:07:33.920
He describes the deployment of American soldiers throughout the world, a fly-opening experience,

65
00:07:33.920 --> 00:07:41.440
he calls it. In Italy, he says, the soldiers found pornography enshrined in stone. In Africa,

66
00:07:41.440 --> 00:07:47.640
in the South Seas, they viewed bare-breast galore. In Paris, the GIs found books we hadn't

67
00:07:47.640 --> 00:07:53.800
dreamed existed, postcards too marvelous to mail, and girls anxious to share their gratitude

68
00:07:53.800 --> 00:08:00.320
for being liberated. In the Verma China Theater, the American boys discovered hashish and a

69
00:08:00.320 --> 00:08:04.560
and a little oriental guidebook called The Perfumed Garden.

70
00:08:04.560 --> 00:08:08.320
Over in India, they run across the Kama Sutra.

71
00:08:08.320 --> 00:08:09.440
Sherman continues,

72
00:08:09.440 --> 00:08:13.860
We went to Scandinavia and the Low Countries and Germany and Japan.

73
00:08:13.860 --> 00:08:18.960
Everywhere there were girls who did things our well-scrubbed sweethearts hadn't yet imagined

74
00:08:18.960 --> 00:08:20.800
and did them for nothing

75
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:26.760
without a labored seduction routine, without the promise of marriage or eternal love.

76
00:08:26.760 --> 00:08:32.760
The boys came home, Sherman reports, they pondered their experience, and some of them

77
00:08:32.760 --> 00:08:40.520
began to quat the sexual revolution in a very militarized way. As he put it, wherever

78
00:08:40.520 --> 00:08:45.680
there was a strawberry church social, they would search and destroy. They would storm

79
00:08:45.680 --> 00:08:51.480
every bastion of decency, besmirch and defile the enemy on the beaches, in the homes and

80
00:08:51.480 --> 00:08:57.360
in the streets. They would recruit allies among the corrupt to spoil the innocent. They would

81
00:08:57.360 --> 00:09:03.040
experiment with new sex positions, new sex locations, new sex kicks. They would open

82
00:09:03.040 --> 00:09:08.520
new sex fronts. Science, for example. They would give smut respectability by dressing

83
00:09:08.520 --> 00:09:13.520
it in the dignified cloak of science. They would shock and shock again.

84
00:09:13.520 --> 00:09:20.380
I think it's correct, at least in a symbolic sort of way, that Sherman dates the beginning

85
00:09:20.380 --> 00:09:40.380
The beginning of the post-war American sex revolution is November 13, 1945, when Bob Hope, that paragon of World War II Americanism, introduced a new joke to wild laughter on his Tuesday night Pepsodent radio show.

86
00:09:40.380 --> 00:09:52.380
The veteran of the USO extravaganza, who had already discovered the crowd-stimulating value of beefcake, now introduced a new innovation.

87
00:09:52.380 --> 00:10:09.380
On that fateful evening, he told a joke about Sonny Wisecarver, a 14-year-old lethario who had just been hauled into California juvenile court for sleeping with and satisfying a variety of Los Angeles housewives.

88
00:10:09.380 --> 00:10:15.820
Encouraged by the wild response, Mr. Hoppe made Sonny Wise Carver jokes a weekly staple

89
00:10:15.820 --> 00:10:25.700
on his show, and we see here the linear ancestor of David Letterman's contemporary routines.

90
00:10:25.700 --> 00:10:32.140
The common point of both Castello, who is a somewhat serious journalist-historian, and

91
00:10:32.140 --> 00:10:46.140
The chairman, a somewhat honest literary clown, is this. If you find modern sexual ethics at all troubling, don't blame just the Woodstock crowd of the 1960s.

92
00:10:46.140 --> 00:10:54.140
Also blame the fallout from the militarized America of World War II, the so-called Good War.

93
00:10:54.140 --> 00:11:06.140
Among the better known tales of military social engineering can also be counted Harry Truman's use of the armed forces as a race relations laboratory in the late 1940s,

94
00:11:06.140 --> 00:11:17.140
Gerald Ford's and Jimmy Carter's use of West Point, Annapolis and Colorado Springs as experiment stations for gender role manipulation in the mid-1970s,

95
00:11:17.140 --> 00:11:23.140
and Bill Clinton's contemporary efforts to use the services for a kind of sexual experimentation.

96
00:11:24.140 --> 00:11:34.140
But I would rather look today at two less well-known aspects of wartime aggression, clear wartime aggression, against the American social order.

97
00:11:35.140 --> 00:11:40.140
The campaign against American regionalism and the campaign against the family.

98
00:11:40.140 --> 00:11:48.940
We've all seen those classic World War II films where a new infantry platoon goes into

99
00:11:48.940 --> 00:11:55.940
basic training, containing a drunken Irishman from Chicago, a sensitive Jew from Manhattan,

100
00:11:55.940 --> 00:12:00.660
a cracker from Georgia, a naive farm boy from Iowa, and so on.

101
00:12:00.660 --> 00:12:06.620
The plot, of course, is the manner in which the military tears down these regional biases

102
00:12:06.620 --> 00:12:12.620
and Loyalties, and builds instead a common Americanism, which goes out to vanquish the

103
00:12:12.620 --> 00:12:16.060
fascist foe.

104
00:12:16.060 --> 00:12:20.580
This is in fact a fairly apt metaphor for what took place in America at a much larger

105
00:12:20.580 --> 00:12:27.640
scale during these years, as nation builders worked to crush the regionalisms still existing

106
00:12:27.640 --> 00:12:29.940
on the land.

107
00:12:29.940 --> 00:12:35.980
Driven by military actions, social mobility in the United States reached its highest peak.

108
00:12:35.980 --> 00:12:43.700
Between December 7, 1941 and March 1945, less than three and one-half years, 12 million

109
00:12:43.700 --> 00:12:50.780
men and women entered the armed forces, while another 15,300,000 American adults left their

110
00:12:50.780 --> 00:12:54.740
county of residence and moved to another location.

111
00:12:54.740 --> 00:13:00.820
Never before in the history of our country, the U.S. Bureau of the Census reports, has

112
00:13:00.820 --> 00:13:08.400
Has there been so great a shuffling and redistribution of population in so short a time? Adding to

113
00:13:08.400 --> 00:13:16.580
this was the deliberate substitution of a militia-based war force by a national army,

114
00:13:16.580 --> 00:13:24.260
an army without local ties, without local loyalties. Not surprisingly, the South was

115
00:13:24.260 --> 00:13:30.720
the chief loser in this war-induced migration and leveling. A Dartmouth sociologist, Francis

116
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:36.060
Thomas Merrill concluded that the war accelerated the pre-war migration of southerners from

117
00:13:36.060 --> 00:13:41.840
rural areas to the rapidly growing industrial areas, with a consequent change in what he

118
00:13:41.840 --> 00:13:48.440
called, with typical New England accent, quote, the extreme cultural isolation which formerly

119
00:13:48.440 --> 00:13:55.280
characterized farm life in the South. He added, at no time since the Civil War has the South

120
00:13:55.280 --> 00:14:00.720
have undergone such a tremendous social ferment.

121
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:08.440
More broadly, by the mid-1940s, a new America was being forged to replace the regional diversity

122
00:14:08.440 --> 00:14:14.680
of the old. Among the architects of this new American order was Henry Luce, editor-in-chief

123
00:14:14.680 --> 00:14:22.520
of Life, Time, Fortune. Contemptuous of American regionalism, and not coincidentally, he was

124
00:14:22.520 --> 00:14:26.840
was born and raised in China, the child of missionaries.

125
00:14:26.840 --> 00:14:34.360
Luce used his magazines during the war to define and instill a generic Americanism.

126
00:14:34.360 --> 00:14:41.920
In 1946 and 47, at the dawn of the Cold War, Luce crafted a major promotional campaign

127
00:14:41.920 --> 00:14:50.000
for Life magazine under the theme, The New America, built around an innovative picture

128
00:14:50.000 --> 00:15:04.640
The campaign subtly denigrated the isolation of the old American regions and celebrated

129
00:15:04.640 --> 00:15:09.840
instead the vast extension of industry, the growing number of middle class families, the

130
00:15:09.840 --> 00:15:17.040
new suburbs, the spirit of unity and the American military forces stationed around the globe.

131
00:15:17.040 --> 00:15:23.360
The script concluded that the America of the 1930s and this new America forged in World

132
00:15:23.360 --> 00:15:30.760
War II were, quote, almost two different countries. So huge are the changes that have increased

133
00:15:30.760 --> 00:15:36.400
our national stature, unquote.

134
00:15:36.400 --> 00:15:41.640
The Good War also brought to culmination the Federal Government's campaign against the

135
00:15:41.640 --> 00:15:47.840
for the Family as an autonomous institution, with the military serving as the vehicle for

136
00:15:47.840 --> 00:15:51.600
another kind of social engineering.

137
00:15:51.600 --> 00:15:57.300
The effort had been mounting for 30 years. From Theodore Roosevelt's 1909 White House

138
00:15:57.300 --> 00:16:03.600
Conference on Children through Hubert Hoover's 1930 White House Conference on Child Health

139
00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:11.100
and Protection, Washington bureaucrats had been struggling to dissolve parent-child bonds.

140
00:16:11.100 --> 00:16:16.060
As participants of the 1930 assembly noted, the federal government's emphasis had swung

141
00:16:16.060 --> 00:16:23.620
from handicapped and disadvantaged children to all children, the whole family of the nation.

142
00:16:23.620 --> 00:16:28.460
Wherever they lived and whatever their situation, they would be sought out.

143
00:16:28.460 --> 00:16:35.540
Indeed, one book issuing from Hoover's conference described a new being called Uncle Sam's

144
00:16:35.540 --> 00:16:48.540
In truth, a kind of socialist bastard, but in the conference words, a new racial experiment and a citizen of a world predestinely moving toward unity.

145
00:16:48.540 --> 00:17:00.540
But in truth, the Federal Government had so far failed to find a really effective vehicle to bring this so-called new racial experiment to fruition.

146
00:17:00.540 --> 00:17:07.040
The breakthrough came in 1940 when Franklin Roosevelt convened his own White House Conference

147
00:17:07.040 --> 00:17:12.540
on Children and a Democracy in the Shadow of War.

148
00:17:12.540 --> 00:17:17.840
This conference shifted the rhetoric in a new way, claiming to work for the security

149
00:17:17.840 --> 00:17:18.840
of the family.

150
00:17:18.840 --> 00:17:25.200
Indeed, it devoted four of its eleven chapters of the final report, Strategies for Saving

151
00:17:25.200 --> 00:17:26.200
the Family.

152
00:17:26.200 --> 00:17:33.760
In response to the conference, Roosevelt created the Family Security Committee within the aptly

153
00:17:33.760 --> 00:17:41.200
named Office of Defense, Health and Welfare Services, Defense, Health and Welfare Services,

154
00:17:41.200 --> 00:17:45.520
think about that for a little while, which claimed to be, quote, safeguarding the values

155
00:17:45.520 --> 00:17:52.680
of family life during the period in which the United States engaged in war.

156
00:17:52.680 --> 00:17:58.440
One must understand, of course, what Roosevelt and his wartime friends meant by family.

157
00:17:58.440 --> 00:18:05.160
They didn't have in mind a freestanding, self-reliant, independent household, the kind that was integral

158
00:18:05.160 --> 00:18:08.240
to the American Republic of old.

159
00:18:08.240 --> 00:18:15.600
Rather, the New Dealers at war embraced what progressive sociologists called the companionate

160
00:18:15.600 --> 00:18:17.960
family.

161
00:18:17.960 --> 00:18:23.680
As practitioner William Ogburn explained in his revealing 1943 book, American Society

162
00:18:23.680 --> 00:18:30.800
in Wartime, the family has lost or is losing its historic functions of economic production

163
00:18:30.800 --> 00:18:38.320
for the market and for home consumption, care of health, education of its members, protective

164
00:18:38.320 --> 00:18:42.440
activities, recreation and religious rights in the home.

165
00:18:42.440 --> 00:18:47.900
Indeed, according to Osborne, the family was left only with the giving and receiving

166
00:18:47.900 --> 00:18:57.900
the bearing of affection by its members, the bearing of children for service to community and state, and a modest role in personality development.

167
00:18:57.900 --> 00:18:59.900
Ogburn went on,

168
00:18:59.900 --> 00:19:08.900
The concept of the family as a companionship embodies the ideals for the preservation of which we are waging this war,

169
00:19:08.900 --> 00:19:19.900
of democracy as the way of life, of the equality of men and women, and of personality as the highest human value."

170
00:19:19.900 --> 00:19:28.900
But of course, as Audburn admitted, the loss by the family of its historic functions has greatly increased its economic insecurity.

171
00:19:28.900 --> 00:19:35.900
The companionship family that they were promoting couldn't feed or clothe itself, couldn't build a house,

172
00:19:35.900 --> 00:19:41.900
couldn't care for its own young, couldn't care for its own sick, couldn't care for its own aged,

173
00:19:41.900 --> 00:19:48.900
it couldn't provide self-protection, it didn't have enough sense to provide recreation or even religious worship.

174
00:19:48.900 --> 00:19:57.900
A democratic, egalitarian, person-centered, companionate family needed, you guessed it, a welfare state

175
00:19:57.900 --> 00:20:04.900
to provide the security and services that families once provided themselves.

176
00:20:04.900 --> 00:20:12.940
And that, according to Ogburn, was what World War II was all about, at least in its social dimensions.

177
00:20:12.940 --> 00:20:23.000
Put another way, the companionate family stood as the ideal consort for the emerging national security state.

178
00:20:23.000 --> 00:20:30.300
The hot war of World War II and the Cold War which followed gave Uncle Sam his experimental fodder.

179
00:20:30.300 --> 00:20:49.300
Between 1941 and 1972, over half of all American males served in the active-duty armed forces for at least some period of their life, an unprecedented generation and a half, who could be shaped, at least to some degree, into the new model social order.

180
00:20:49.300 --> 00:20:58.300
Political and military leaders embraced and institutionalized the companionate family model for their far-flung American garrisons.

181
00:20:58.300 --> 00:21:05.420
Among officers' wives, this meant adapting certain unwritten customs for mass guidance and education,

182
00:21:05.420 --> 00:21:11.020
chronicled in the etiquette books that poured out after 1945.

183
00:21:11.020 --> 00:21:18.300
Inhaling deeply of the spirit of Cold War, Helen Todd Westphalings, Army lady today,

184
00:21:18.300 --> 00:21:25.100
stressed that just as wives esteem, respect and dignify the estate and sanctity of marriage,

185
00:21:25.100 --> 00:21:36.740
So they extended these sentiments of marriage to the integrity and justice of the boundless frontier of democracy our country represents.

186
00:21:36.740 --> 00:21:50.900
In their book, The Navy Wife, Anne Briscoe Pye and Nancy Shea endorsed the production of Navy juniors, or children, as the most important job of your life, the one for which you were designed.

187
00:21:50.900 --> 00:22:00.900
This vision of the family married to the democratic empire and in its service was just what FDR had in mind.

188
00:22:00.900 --> 00:22:06.900
The socialization of the families of enlisted men occurred in more direct or statist fashion.

189
00:22:06.900 --> 00:22:13.900
The services crafted a full welfare system, which turned both the man and his family into military dependents.

190
00:22:13.900 --> 00:22:21.200
Pentagon planners reasoned that adequate welfare benefits would usefully insulate personnel from the outside world,

191
00:22:21.200 --> 00:22:27.300
provide a sense of security, foster morale, and encourage an attitude of solidarity.

192
00:22:27.300 --> 00:22:32.700
All attributes, I need note, of the ideal social democratic order.

193
00:22:32.700 --> 00:22:39.100
In 1942, a Congressional Act extended for the first time special medical benefits to military dependents,

194
00:22:39.100 --> 00:22:49.100
including obstetrical care, post exchanges and commissaries, enjoying a number of hidden subsidies, offered tax-free goods at discounted costs.

195
00:22:49.100 --> 00:22:56.100
Full health benefits for military dependents came through the Dependence Medical Care Act of 1956.

196
00:22:56.100 --> 00:23:00.100
On-base housing construction mushroomed in the 1950s.

197
00:23:00.100 --> 00:23:04.100
Meanwhile, the Army opened a series of daycare centers designed, quote,

198
00:23:04.100 --> 00:23:13.180
In the mid-1960s, Congress expanded again the availability of government-backed medical

199
00:23:13.180 --> 00:23:21.280
care and social services. This uniquely military form of socialism, spurred on, made possible

200
00:23:21.280 --> 00:23:27.940
by the Cold War, encompassed an ever-growing number of Americans. But the companionate

201
00:23:27.940 --> 00:23:37.140
Any family, in fact a weak, fragile, unstable remnant of the institutional family, couldn't

202
00:23:37.140 --> 00:23:42.460
hold together for long, despite the impressive appearance of the Cold War family structure

203
00:23:42.460 --> 00:23:51.380
in the 1950s. By the end of that decade, it is true, 85% of all military officers were

204
00:23:51.380 --> 00:23:58.220
were married, compared to 69% of male civilians. The military divorce rate was significantly

205
00:23:58.220 --> 00:24:04.220
lower than that of civilians. Officers' wives appeared to be more traditional than their

206
00:24:04.220 --> 00:24:10.180
civilian counterparts, and their children appeared to be more numerous. But when a renewed

207
00:24:10.180 --> 00:24:16.420
feminist movement hit the military services with full force after 1970, the whole system

208
00:24:16.420 --> 00:24:24.460
collapsed as a house of cards. The very independence expected of Cold War military wives left them

209
00:24:24.460 --> 00:24:31.160
an easy mark for the new ideology, while the ideologists of the companionate family, such

210
00:24:31.160 --> 00:24:38.660
as Ogborn and Harvard's Talcott Parsons, were pushed aside by a more ruthless breed,

211
00:24:38.660 --> 00:24:44.500
a modern version of the National Socialist Feminists of War.

212
00:24:44.500 --> 00:24:50.400
By 1980, less than one out of five Air Force families could be counted as traditional,

213
00:24:50.400 --> 00:24:56.760
composed of an Air Force father, non-working mother, and at least one child. Single parent

214
00:24:56.760 --> 00:25:03.080
and androgynous families were soaring in prominence, both in military theory and in fact, as were

215
00:25:03.080 --> 00:25:07.520
demands for more day care, more health care, more social services.

216
00:25:07.520 --> 00:25:14.480
By the mid-1980s, the U.S. Army had shifted its definition of family once again, embracing

217
00:25:14.480 --> 00:25:17.480
Having a Collectivist Alternative.

218
00:25:17.480 --> 00:25:25.240
As one official Army statement explained in the year of the Army family, enhanced benefits,

219
00:25:25.240 --> 00:25:30.360
increased family dependence on the State, and more therapeutic counseling would help

220
00:25:30.360 --> 00:25:39.560
merge individual families into the total Army family, a formulation, dare I note, appropriately

221
00:25:39.560 --> 00:25:51.720
The Story here is actually very simple. Modern wars, even cold ones, swell the size and power

222
00:25:51.720 --> 00:26:00.280
of the state, and as the state grows, the family declines. And the lesson is also simple.

223
00:26:00.280 --> 00:26:06.840
It is time for persons on the political right to cast off lingering delusions about the

224
00:26:06.840 --> 00:26:12.180
and conservative traditions of the military, traditions such as the cultivation of the

225
00:26:12.180 --> 00:26:19.400
arts of war, of a sense of duty, of manhood, or defense of one's family and inherited

226
00:26:19.400 --> 00:26:26.400
way of life. Rather, I fear that we face, at the end of the 21st century, something

227
00:26:26.400 --> 00:26:34.920
closer to Carmel's new model army, one being used to re-engineer our society to serve a

228
00:26:34.920 --> 00:26:41.920
a total state, one engaged in a kind of perpetual social and moral revolution.

229
00:26:41.920 --> 00:27:04.920
We've got a few questions here, so I'm happy to try to do that. Yes, sir?

230
00:27:04.920 --> 00:27:22.920
When you were listing those things which the Army, or the military, excuse me, had shed off, you left out one that I prayed our country had shed off, and that word was honor.

231
00:27:22.920 --> 00:27:32.920
Okay. I'll accept that. Any other questions or comments? Yes, Paul?

232
00:27:32.920 --> 00:27:58.920
Can you describe exactly at what point the army ceases to be a defender of more or less traditional family values and embraces the feminist army, Roger's model we discussed in the second half of the paper. Is there any sublimity of watershed?

233
00:28:02.920 --> 00:28:26.920
start to shift. I'm sorry, he asked if there was any significant date, sort of a watershed point at which the sort of traditional looking military family shifted towards a more androgynous, experimental family, and I would say the early 1970s, it was a little delayed from that.

234
00:28:26.920 --> 00:28:33.920
I might note that, as I explained in an article I did not too long ago for policy review,

235
00:28:33.920 --> 00:28:38.920
there is a solution to this and it's a two-part solution.

236
00:28:38.920 --> 00:28:44.920
On the one hand, if we must have a standing army, which I believe we must, at least some form of standing army and navy,

237
00:28:44.920 --> 00:28:51.920
is to go back to the old American model, which was that force would be primarily a bachelor force.

238
00:28:51.920 --> 00:29:03.920
Warriors without dependents, except among senior officers and senior NCOs, supplemented by a large and much better organized and better equipped militia system,

239
00:29:03.920 --> 00:29:11.920
which is again the historic structure of the American military prior to the Cold War.

240
00:29:11.920 --> 00:29:15.920
That's the way out of the dilemma in some ways we've created.

241
00:29:15.920 --> 00:29:22.920
It's a dilemma which has given opportunities to ideologues to apply their trade.

242
00:29:22.920 --> 00:29:25.920
Any other questions?

243
00:29:25.920 --> 00:29:28.920
Yes, sir?

244
00:29:28.920 --> 00:29:35.920
Oh, well, bachelor military force, a better militia.

245
00:29:35.920 --> 00:29:39.920
Or reliance, in fact. I mean, going back to a militia structure.

246
00:29:39.920 --> 00:29:55.920
What is your observation on current trends of women in the military and will that continue?

247
00:30:09.920 --> 00:30:24.920
Certainly, the services under the Clinton administration are planning and recently the Navy announced that they were going to push that even further.

248
00:30:24.920 --> 00:30:31.920
Right now, about 20% of Navy ships are gender-integrated. He says we're going to gender-integrate them all.

249
00:30:31.920 --> 00:30:39.920
So I think it's going to increase. Are there problems with it? There's problems galore.

250
00:30:39.920 --> 00:30:47.920
I think the main problem is that, yes, the military, too, I think function correctly, needs to be a masculine institution.

251
00:30:47.920 --> 00:30:58.920
I say that not out of some lingering patriarchy, as everyone knows, I believe in gender egalitarianism completely, but simply as a functional matter.

252
00:30:58.920 --> 00:31:07.960
A military force needs to have that organization in order to be effective and there was plenty

253
00:31:07.960 --> 00:31:14.920
of evidence coming out of the academies in the 70s and early 80s that the attempts to

254
00:31:14.920 --> 00:31:22.160
gender integrate West Point and Annapolis and Colorado Springs was not going well. It

255
00:31:22.160 --> 00:31:30.920
It was going very badly, and in fact that's what they've done.

256
00:31:30.920 --> 00:31:35.800
I think what's happening is that what we're getting is a managerial force, where increasingly

257
00:31:35.800 --> 00:31:43.560
the officer structure are people who get along in that system, and they resemble the managers

258
00:31:43.560 --> 00:31:49.200
that run the Fortune 500 corporations, and they resemble the managers who run the great

259
00:31:49.200 --> 00:31:56.800
Bureaucracies. What will happen to that force when they face a real war against a worthy

260
00:31:56.800 --> 00:32:04.280
opponent I think is the question. I think it will have trouble winning that war. Yes.

261
00:32:04.280 --> 00:32:18.280
He was asking about Ferdinand Mount's book, The Subversive Family.

262
00:32:18.280 --> 00:32:25.280
Well, scholarship, I don't think it's very good. I think he misinterprets, for example, the Christian view of the family.

263
00:32:25.280 --> 00:32:30.280
I think he takes an extreme view and kind of goes with that.

264
00:32:30.280 --> 00:32:35.280
On the other hand, I think it is true that the family is always self-recreating.

265
00:32:35.280 --> 00:32:39.280
I think Chesterton said that better.

266
00:32:39.280 --> 00:32:48.280
He said it was the one natural anarchist institution in the sense that it is the only institution that is independent of the state

267
00:32:48.280 --> 00:32:54.280
and exists prior to the state and can always be recreated independent of the state.

268
00:32:54.280 --> 00:32:59.280
So he called it the one natural anarchist institution.

269
00:32:59.280 --> 00:33:13.280
Would you tell us about the writing experience with women in the audience?

270
00:33:29.280 --> 00:33:48.280
In this extreme crisis, the Arab armies were pouring in to the newly partitioned Israel, but in fact women were put on the line, and the general experience was that it was a terrible thing, it was quickly stopped.

271
00:33:48.280 --> 00:33:54.280
It was found that it confused authorities, the lines of authority.

272
00:33:54.280 --> 00:34:02.680
It confused the ability of men to obey commands and its demoralization of troops who saw women

273
00:34:02.680 --> 00:34:08.960
being killed and butchered in the manner which I believe you described was just tremendously

274
00:34:08.960 --> 00:34:16.440
demoralizing and they decided to put a stop to it.

275
00:34:16.440 --> 00:34:21.760
Women are still, you know, serving the Israeli force but in non-combatant positions.

276
00:34:21.760 --> 00:34:27.960
It was a few years ago, the Bush administration had a presidential commission on the assignment

277
00:34:27.960 --> 00:34:31.180
of women in the military or something to that effect.

278
00:34:31.180 --> 00:34:36.320
And I guess one of the more interesting moments there is they brought in a ranking senior

279
00:34:36.320 --> 00:34:39.760
Israeli officer to testify.

280
00:34:39.760 --> 00:34:45.340
And he went over this history and how it had been tried and abandoned even at a time of

281
00:34:45.340 --> 00:34:49.020
of Great National Emergency, of Great Crisis.

282
00:34:49.020 --> 00:34:52.140
And he said this, and I said, I want you to know this, too.

283
00:34:52.140 --> 00:34:54.620
The fact that America is contemplating doing this,

284
00:34:54.620 --> 00:34:58.220
in fact is doing it, on a wide-scale basis,

285
00:34:58.220 --> 00:34:59.960
and planning to introduce more women

286
00:34:59.960 --> 00:35:03.220
into more combat roles tells us,

287
00:35:03.220 --> 00:35:04.740
he was an intelligence officer, I believe,

288
00:35:04.740 --> 00:35:07.340
tells us that America is no longer serious

289
00:35:08.460 --> 00:35:12.360
about its military structure.

290
00:35:12.360 --> 00:35:23.360
that in fact it is allowing the force to be transformed into an ideological, he didn't use these words, but an ideological tool as opposed to a war-making tool.

291
00:35:23.360 --> 00:35:53.320
Well, you know, I was asked to testify before that commission and I did. I was, they did a hearing in Chicago and I

292
00:35:53.320 --> 00:36:23.320
and I was asked to give the Midwestern perspective and I had, so I did that, whatever, summer of 92, summer of 92 and opposite me giving the other Midwestern perspective was a female anthropologist from the University of Wisconsin and I did my spiel, anyway she was asked in the session, she says, one of the commissioners asked, can you name a single instance or any instances in history

293
00:36:23.320 --> 00:36:27.320
in the 17th Century, where women warriors actually succeeded.

294
00:36:27.320 --> 00:36:33.640
And she said, well, there is one, and it was, there was a king in West Africa in the 17th

295
00:36:33.640 --> 00:36:41.120
Century who had developed a force of Amazon warriors, fierce women warriors, who she said

296
00:36:41.120 --> 00:36:44.280
won many battles and greater the great empire.

297
00:36:44.280 --> 00:36:49.040
She said, now, it is true that they were forbidden to marry and they were forbidden to have children.

298
00:36:49.040 --> 00:36:54.040
They were, you know, sort of true total Amazons, if you'll have it.

299
00:36:54.040 --> 00:36:57.040
And I was asked what I thought about that.

300
00:36:57.040 --> 00:36:59.040
Well, at first I gave the conventional answer.

301
00:36:59.040 --> 00:37:06.040
Well, that's just an obscure reference to a semi-mythical kingdom.

302
00:37:06.040 --> 00:37:08.040
What do we know about that?

303
00:37:08.040 --> 00:37:11.040
But as I thought about it more, in fact, I think the exception there proved the rule.

304
00:37:11.040 --> 00:37:14.040
They were bachelorettes.

305
00:37:14.040 --> 00:37:18.040
And in fact, if you want a female army composed of fierce bachelorettes,

306
00:37:18.040 --> 00:37:22.040
If you're going to match Loretts, I think it might be relatively effective.

307
00:37:22.040 --> 00:37:27.040
But I don't think you're going to get many recruits.

308
00:37:27.040 --> 00:37:32.040
They're all busy working in Washington right now.

309
00:37:32.040 --> 00:37:35.040
Yes, over here.

310
00:37:35.040 --> 00:37:39.040
In late 1944, with the Third Reich falling down around the years,

311
00:37:39.040 --> 00:37:44.040
it was reduced to having women in combat roles.

312
00:37:44.040 --> 00:37:51.040
He didn't use gas either. He had his experience with that.

313
00:38:14.040 --> 00:38:25.040
And if they aren't fooling you, how is it that these far more ingrained armies are daughters, and who trusted the southerners, and the fools, and I don't like to call this,

314
00:38:25.040 --> 00:38:31.040
you don't end up generating so many more of that kind of mass, relating most to sacred reading?

315
00:38:44.040 --> 00:38:46.040
and the Civil-Conservative Wars.

316
00:38:46.040 --> 00:38:47.040
That's a good question.

317
00:38:47.040 --> 00:38:56.040
Yeah, you're right, there are statistics.

318
00:38:56.040 --> 00:39:00.360
And there's no question that the officer corps was disproportionately southern until recently.

319
00:39:00.360 --> 00:39:07.160
I suspect that figure has changed more recently now that they're very careful about all kinds

320
00:39:07.160 --> 00:39:08.160
of quotas.

321
00:39:08.160 --> 00:39:20.160
But the officer corps, certainly the traditions of the Army, even when I was going through some training 25 years ago, there was still a strong, just sort of a southern connection.

322
00:39:20.160 --> 00:39:32.160
You know, sort of the Army seemed to be right down at Fort Benning. It fit in down there in a way that it didn't fit in up in Illinois. Any other? Okay, sure.

323
00:39:32.160 --> 00:39:37.160
Sorry to get up twice now. If you'd keep talking, I wouldn't talk because you're that good.

324
00:39:37.160 --> 00:39:44.160
But Sledgehammer mentioned Pat Schroeder and Janet Reno being in combat.

325
00:39:44.160 --> 00:39:48.160
I think one thing we could count on there would be no rape.

326
00:39:48.160 --> 00:40:11.160
I did get up for a better purpose than that. You were talking about West Point, Colorado Springs and Annapolis and what had happened.

327
00:40:11.160 --> 00:40:18.160
He was in the presence of a West Point graduate who said, I never go back to reunions anymore.

328
00:40:18.160 --> 00:40:28.160
And he recalled a CBS attack road reporter on a VMI cadet, our sister institution at the Central.

329
00:40:28.160 --> 00:40:35.160
And this freshman was going to be asked, what do you think about women coming to VMI?

330
00:40:35.160 --> 00:40:38.160
And he said, I'm against it.

331
00:40:38.160 --> 00:40:45.160
He said, why are you against it? And he knew it was going to be a great sound bite on TBS News and everything.

332
00:40:45.160 --> 00:40:49.160
And the freshman said, well, we wouldn't want to be another West Point.

333
00:40:52.160 --> 00:40:55.160
I think that's enough said, Lew, okay?