WEBVTT

NOTE Protectionism, War, and the Southern Tradition

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
Politics, like war, robs words of their meaning.

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:08.000
This is especially true of the language of economics.

3
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:14.000
For example, economists know what investment means, and that it's good for the economy.

4
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:22.000
But the Clinton administration uses investment to mean its profligate spending projects, which are, of course, harmful to the economy.

5
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:28.000
In 18th century America, our forefathers knew what was meant by the word rights.

6
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:34.200
When Thomas Jefferson and others used it, it meant limitations on government power.

7
00:00:34.200 --> 00:00:40.640
In today's America, however, the word rights becomes synonymous with government power.

8
00:00:40.640 --> 00:00:46.000
A violation of rights has come to mean the exercise of liberty.

9
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:49.720
So it is with the phrase free trade.

10
00:00:49.720 --> 00:00:55.480
Politics and in particular that most concentrated form of politics, war, have ruined its meaning.

11
00:00:55.480 --> 00:01:01.020
In the 18th and 19th centuries the term described the economic regime under which people can

12
00:01:01.020 --> 00:01:05.920
buy and sell across borders without penalty from the government.

13
00:01:05.920 --> 00:01:09.980
The case for free trade was the case for free markets.

14
00:01:09.980 --> 00:01:14.380
When the government interferes in the freedom to contract it benefits some, that is powerful

15
00:01:14.380 --> 00:01:18.560
special interests, at the expense of others, that is the people.

16
00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:23.200
Under free trade on the other hand the general good is served.

17
00:01:23.200 --> 00:01:27.800
Essentially free trade was not like mercantilism, where the government monopolizes and otherwise

18
00:01:27.800 --> 00:01:33.640
hinders the right to trade across borders. Free trade was not like an export policy,

19
00:01:33.640 --> 00:01:38.360
where domestic producers are subsidized so they can push their goods on unwilling consumers

20
00:01:38.360 --> 00:01:44.640
abroad. Free trade was not like a producer policy, where large producers conspire with

21
00:01:44.640 --> 00:01:49.720
the government to decide what goods will be allowed to cross borders. Free trade was not

22
00:01:49.720 --> 00:01:57.720
Free Trade was not like an industrial policy where large corporations are given investment guarantees in the disguised form of aid to foreign regimes.

23
00:01:57.720 --> 00:02:06.720
Free Trade was not like imperialism where a more powerful government imposes its will on a less powerful one through intimidation and force.

24
00:02:06.720 --> 00:02:10.720
Free Trade was an ideal that grew out of the vision of liberty.

25
00:02:10.720 --> 00:02:17.720
The same freedom that governs the market at home, its proponents believed, ought to govern trade across borders.

26
00:02:17.720 --> 00:02:24.720
Just as private parties negotiate their contracts for goods and services at home, they would do so abroad.

27
00:02:24.720 --> 00:02:34.720
In the 18th and 19th century, to be a free trader meant to apply pressure to try and bring about this ideal through intellectual persuasion and political lobbying.

28
00:02:34.720 --> 00:02:43.720
Free traders brought that pressure to bear against their own government. That was where their moral obligation began and ended.

29
00:02:43.720 --> 00:02:46.720
What about the term protectionism?

30
00:02:46.720 --> 00:02:51.880
It meant government manipulation of trade on behalf of particular interest groups.

31
00:02:51.880 --> 00:02:56.880
Governments can do this alone by erecting tariffs, quotas and sanctions.

32
00:02:56.880 --> 00:03:02.880
Governments can engage in protectionism in cahoots with other governments, as in NAFTA or GATT.

33
00:03:02.880 --> 00:03:08.880
But however it is achieved, protectionism constitutes intervention in the natural order of liberty.

34
00:03:08.880 --> 00:03:13.880
To be consistent with history and theory, people who claim to favor free trade

35
00:03:13.880 --> 00:03:20.880
should be agitating against the U.S.'s protectionist policies and U.S.'s support of the protectionist policies of others.

36
00:03:20.880 --> 00:03:29.880
Instead, many of the so-called free traders devote their energies to lobbying for NAFTA and GATT, which represent the opposite of free trade.

37
00:03:29.880 --> 00:03:34.880
These agreements are mercantilist because they exalt the right of government to hinder trade.

38
00:03:34.880 --> 00:03:39.880
They support an export-driven policy under which producers are subsidized.

39
00:03:39.880 --> 00:03:46.680
They embody industrial policy where large corporations are paid off. They are imperialistic

40
00:03:46.680 --> 00:03:52.720
with regulations on labor and the environment to be harmonized across borders.

41
00:03:52.720 --> 00:03:58.040
How did this all begin? When did free trade come to mean its opposite? As with so much

42
00:03:58.040 --> 00:04:03.520
else it was the Second World War that changed everything. The trust and deference that the

43
00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:08.400
American people gave the government during the war spilled over to the post-war plans

44
00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:11.900
for Carving Up the Spoils.

45
00:04:11.900 --> 00:04:16.840
At the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944, trade came to mean investment guarantees and global

46
00:04:16.840 --> 00:04:21.680
bureaucracies and status treaties between governments.

47
00:04:21.680 --> 00:04:25.720
This was central planning exalted to new heights.

48
00:04:25.720 --> 00:04:31.800
As F. A. Hayek wrote in the neglected conclusion to his 1944 book, The Road to Serfdom, quote,

49
00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:36.620
if international economic relations, instead of being between individuals, become relations

50
00:04:36.620 --> 00:04:51.420
Ludwig von Mises concluded his 1944 book, Omnipotent Government, The Rise of the Total

51
00:04:51.420 --> 00:04:56.760
State and Total War, with a similar warning. The establishment, he said, of an international

52
00:04:56.760 --> 00:05:02.420
body for foreign trade planning will end in hyper-protectionism. These two great free

53
00:05:02.420 --> 00:05:06.820
Murray Markety has understood how government uses the period immediately following a war,

54
00:05:06.820 --> 00:05:12.260
as it does the war itself, for state power and special interest rewards.

55
00:05:12.260 --> 00:05:16.060
The Wilson administration had attempted this after the First World War.

56
00:05:16.060 --> 00:05:21.600
An early draft of the League of Nations Treaty included a World Trade Tribunal.

57
00:05:21.600 --> 00:05:25.900
After the Second World War, Mises and Hayek did not want such a thing to be imposed on

58
00:05:25.900 --> 00:05:26.900
us.

59
00:05:26.900 --> 00:05:30.980
Instead, they wanted to recreate the 19th century ideal.

60
00:05:30.980 --> 00:05:35.300
And thanks to the work of Mises and other partisans of the free market, when the Truman

61
00:05:35.300 --> 00:05:39.900
administration emerged from negotiations in Havana with something called the International

62
00:05:39.900 --> 00:05:45.580
Trade Organization, free market advocates were ready. We had had the World Bank and

63
00:05:45.580 --> 00:05:51.740
the International Monetary Fund foisted on us, but free traders did stop the ITO. The

64
00:05:51.740 --> 00:05:57.420
lobbying efforts of Philip Courtney under the influence of Henry Hazlitt proved definitive.

65
00:05:57.420 --> 00:06:01.620
In his book, The Economic Munich, Courtney explained the dangers of turning over trade

66
00:06:01.620 --> 00:06:06.600
policy to an international body. In the long run, he said, a centralized trade authority

67
00:06:06.600 --> 00:06:12.640
will globalize protectionism. Courtney cited the Charter of the International Trade Organization

68
00:06:12.640 --> 00:06:17.740
to make its point. It endorsed demand-side management and full-employment policies, which

69
00:06:17.740 --> 00:06:22.660
Courtney rightly regarded as code words for government planning.

70
00:06:22.660 --> 00:06:27.100
Thanks to such intellectual leaders and the old right in Congress, the ITO went down to

71
00:06:27.100 --> 00:06:28.400
defeat.

72
00:06:28.400 --> 00:06:34.140
Of course, during the debates, the elites never missed a chance to smear ITO opponents,

73
00:06:34.140 --> 00:06:37.780
and the language of trade was permanently subverted.

74
00:06:37.780 --> 00:06:42.220
Advocates of global bureaucracies began calling themselves free traders.

75
00:06:42.220 --> 00:06:46.420
The ITO, they said, would save free trade from itself just as the New Deal had saved

76
00:06:46.420 --> 00:06:49.500
capitalism from itself.

77
00:06:49.500 --> 00:06:59.500
The opponents of world bureaucracies, no matter how much they favored free trade, were called isolationists, protectionists and nationalists, words drawn from recent war propaganda.

78
00:06:59.500 --> 00:07:08.500
As true believers in trade, the old right would not accept the term isolationist, and as opponents of mercantilism, of course, they rejected the word protectionist.

79
00:07:08.500 --> 00:07:16.500
But they did not oppose the term nationalist, and I use nationalism in Clyde Wilson's sense of patriotism.

80
00:07:16.500 --> 00:07:23.500
They were nationalists, in fact, of the sort that Mises had praised in his 1919 work, Nation, State and Economy.

81
00:07:23.500 --> 00:07:31.500
They believed with him that, quote, no people or part of a people should be held against his will in a political association it does not want.

82
00:07:31.500 --> 00:07:39.500
Centralizing bodies managing trade are, of course, not compatible with self-determination, even if erected in the name of free trade.

83
00:07:39.500 --> 00:07:46.500
In holding this view, the old right was in a great American tradition of southern free traders from Jefferson to Calhoun.

84
00:07:46.500 --> 00:07:55.500
This tradition was not rooted in an internationalist ideology, obviously, neither did its proponents push for global treaties that violate sovereignty.

85
00:07:55.500 --> 00:08:02.500
The tradition was based on a hard-nosed understanding of the nature of power and a devotion to federalism and local control.

86
00:08:02.500 --> 00:08:07.500
When power is centralized, they argued, it expands and will be used against the people.

87
00:08:07.500 --> 00:08:11.500
The best way to limit power is to limit centralization.

88
00:08:11.500 --> 00:08:17.500
For example, it is in the economic interest of smaller political units to maintain open trading relationships.

89
00:08:17.500 --> 00:08:24.500
The larger the political unit, as Hans Hoppe has shown, the more inviting a policy of autarky can appear.

90
00:08:24.500 --> 00:08:30.500
The Southern free traders link their economic doctrine with states' rights as embodied in the Constitution,

91
00:08:30.500 --> 00:08:34.940
and with a non-interventionist foreign policy and severe limitations on what they called

92
00:08:34.940 --> 00:08:40.140
consolidation that is centralization. These ideas meld in on a theoretical level because

93
00:08:40.140 --> 00:08:44.520
they speak to the right of individuals and communities to be free from the arbitrary

94
00:08:44.520 --> 00:08:49.740
power of distant rulers. One of the reasons the Declaration of Independence

95
00:08:49.740 --> 00:08:54.860
gave for overthrowing King George III was that he was quote, cutting off our trade with

96
00:08:54.860 --> 00:09:00.780
of All Parts of the World." Jefferson presents a more elaborate argument in his 1774 essay

97
00:09:00.780 --> 00:09:05.920
Summary View of the Rights of British America. The outrages of the Sugar Act and the Towns

98
00:09:05.920 --> 00:09:10.700
and Duties demonstrated that Britain was willing to use coercion to deny Americans the liberty

99
00:09:10.700 --> 00:09:15.960
to trade, meaning to buy and to sell from whomever they pleased. Jefferson regarded this as the

100
00:09:15.960 --> 00:09:22.280
essence of tyranny intolerable enough to warrant a violent overthrow of the government. Single

101
00:09:22.280 --> 00:09:27.840
Relax if tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day," he wrote in 1774, but

102
00:09:27.840 --> 00:09:32.660
a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every

103
00:09:32.660 --> 00:09:39.720
change of ministers to plainly prove the deliberate, systematical plan of reducing us to slavery.

104
00:09:39.720 --> 00:09:44.620
To ensure the right of trade among other rights, the founders established not a central government

105
00:09:44.620 --> 00:09:49.740
but a federal one. It was a union among states and these individual states who would protect

106
00:09:49.740 --> 00:10:00.860
Trade became an issue again in the debates on the Constitution, however. The so-called

107
00:10:00.860 --> 00:10:05.780
Federalists, actually the Centralizers, accused the states of erecting barriers to trade under

108
00:10:05.780 --> 00:10:10.540
the Articles of Confederation. This was among the most serious accusations that could be

109
00:10:10.540 --> 00:10:15.220
made and implied that the states were doing to each other what King George had done to

110
00:10:15.220 --> 00:10:22.220
The Federalists argued that the Constitution was necessary to bring about free trade among the states.

111
00:10:22.220 --> 00:10:28.220
In particular, they argued the Commerce Clause would be the essential guarantee of a free flow of goods.

112
00:10:28.220 --> 00:10:35.220
The Anti-Federalists, really the Anti-Centralists, and of course the official moniker as being another example of the misuse of language,

113
00:10:35.220 --> 00:10:42.220
countered that the Commerce Clause conflicted with another value of preceptive American liberty, that is, states' rights.

114
00:10:42.220 --> 00:10:56.220
The Anti-Federalists warned that the freedom of trade, like all freedoms, was best protected by the decentralized Articles of Confederation or something similar, rather than by a new central government with new powers, especially the power to conduct trade policy.

115
00:10:56.220 --> 00:11:04.220
The Anti-Federalists argued that this clause could and therefore would be abused to the advantage of one sector as opposed to another.

116
00:11:04.220 --> 00:11:10.220
But the Constitution passed upon James Madison's promise that this would never be so.

117
00:11:10.220 --> 00:11:19.220
The Commerce Clause, he said, would forever be used to protect the liberty of every American to trade in an unhindered way with every other American.

118
00:11:19.220 --> 00:11:22.220
Of course, history did not turn out that way.

119
00:11:22.220 --> 00:11:30.220
After the overthrow of the King, the partisans of Northern industrial and banking interests began agitating to abandon the principles of the Declaration.

120
00:11:30.220 --> 00:11:39.220
The Hamiltonians wanted the powers of King George to be exercised by the President in violation of the principles agreed upon in the Constitution.

121
00:11:39.220 --> 00:11:45.220
Their goal was the enrichment of special interests, manufacturing and banking at the expense of the southern states.

122
00:11:45.220 --> 00:11:54.220
The great statesmen of the first half of the 19th century, free traders to a man, were devoted to stopping the Hamiltonian policy of executive power,

123
00:11:54.220 --> 00:11:59.220
entangling alliances in war, taxes and protectionism to benefit northern elites.

124
00:11:59.220 --> 00:12:05.220
These men combined the best of nationalism with a principal devotion to free trade and to private property.

125
00:12:05.220 --> 00:12:11.140
The Old Republicans wanted the political victory of 1800 years to roll back the centralizing

126
00:12:11.140 --> 00:12:15.940
that had taken place since 1787. Their goal was to secure a permanent victory over the

127
00:12:15.940 --> 00:12:22.180
Hamiltonians who were both pro-state and pro-war as well as pro-tariff. Among the greatest

128
00:12:22.180 --> 00:12:27.460
of the Southern Republicans was John Randolph of Roanoke, the aristocratic libertarian.

129
00:12:27.460 --> 00:12:31.740
He said, quote, let us adhere to the policy laid down by the second as well as by the

130
00:12:31.740 --> 00:12:36.860
by the first founder of our republic, by the Camillus as well as the Romulus of the infant

131
00:12:36.860 --> 00:12:41.900
state, to the policy of peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling

132
00:12:41.900 --> 00:12:48.440
alliances with none." He was among the earliest and most hardcore of all the anti-protectionists

133
00:12:48.440 --> 00:12:55.600
of the Old South. His reasons were part philosophical, part economic, and part political. As a partisan

134
00:12:55.600 --> 00:13:00.240
of states' rights, he saw no justification for granting an external power the right to

135
00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:04.480
to Interfere with Commerce and the Use of Private Property.

136
00:13:04.480 --> 00:13:06.240
Yet Randolph was also a nationalist

137
00:13:06.240 --> 00:13:08.760
of a particularly American sort.

138
00:13:08.760 --> 00:13:10.640
Quote, when I speak of my country, he wrote,

139
00:13:10.640 --> 00:13:14.820
John Brockenbrough, I mean the Commonwealth of Virginia.

140
00:13:14.820 --> 00:13:17.800
I was born in allegiance to George III.

141
00:13:17.800 --> 00:13:20.040
My ancestors threw off the oppressive yoke

142
00:13:20.040 --> 00:13:22.640
of the mother country, but they never made me subject

143
00:13:22.640 --> 00:13:26.340
to the New England in matter of spiritual or temporal,

144
00:13:26.340 --> 00:13:28.840
neither do I mean to become so voluntarily.

145
00:13:28.840 --> 00:13:37.840
Another great old Republican was John Taylor of Caroline. He was not only a brilliant political philosopher, he led the opposition to the Northern Protective Tariff.

146
00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:46.840
Quote, give us a free and open competition in our own market, he said, and we fear not to encounter like competition in the general market of the world.

147
00:13:46.840 --> 00:13:56.840
Taylor saw the tariff as part of the apparatus of status domination. The interest groups behind it were Northern industrialists who wanted to feed their private greed at public expense.

148
00:13:56.840 --> 00:14:01.960
Expense. Rather than selling their wares on a level playing field of free competition,

149
00:14:01.960 --> 00:14:07.400
they sought government privilege. In 1821, the Congressional Committee of Manufacturers

150
00:14:07.400 --> 00:14:13.040
issued a report calling for protective tariffs to expand industry. In today's language,

151
00:14:13.040 --> 00:14:17.940
they call this growing the economy, expanding trade, knocking fair trade, or any of a number

152
00:14:17.940 --> 00:14:23.960
of other chivalettes used to centralize trade authority. But Taylor saw the real motive

153
00:14:23.960 --> 00:14:28.920
of Tariffs, they were a power grab. But the manufacturers sought to gain what would come

154
00:14:28.920 --> 00:14:34.120
at the South's expense in two respects. First, economically, the tariff harmed agriculture

155
00:14:34.120 --> 00:14:38.480
and transferred wealth. Second, politically, it was contrary to the free trade sentiments

156
00:14:38.480 --> 00:14:42.880
of the Old South, and it subverted Southern rights of political self-determination, and

157
00:14:42.880 --> 00:14:49.080
was therefore a violation of the original Federal Compact. Taylor was a lover of peace, so the

158
00:14:49.080 --> 00:14:54.440
The industrialists were his natural enemies. As is so often the case, the pro-tariff party

159
00:14:54.440 --> 00:14:59.220
was also the pro-war party. The industrialists favored Hamilton's attempt to foment a war

160
00:14:59.220 --> 00:15:04.700
with France to enhance the executive. Taylor noted that the industrialist's 1821 report

161
00:15:04.700 --> 00:15:11.620
complained that, quote, we flourished in war and are depressed in peace because manufacturers

162
00:15:11.620 --> 00:15:17.240
then flourished and now are depressed, unquote. They hoped that the tariffs would similarly

163
00:15:17.240 --> 00:15:23.860
really enhanced their profits. Only today's war and tariff party were half that honest.

164
00:15:23.860 --> 00:15:29.400
Taylor responded as follows. They say, he said, quote, we flourished in war. Who are

165
00:15:29.400 --> 00:15:35.440
we? Not the people of the states generally. They were loaded with taxes, deprived of commerce,

166
00:15:35.440 --> 00:15:40.360
and involved in debt. The families which flourished during the war were the contracting and industrial

167
00:15:40.360 --> 00:15:44.960
families, the latter by loans and premiums and by selling the wares of their factories

168
00:15:44.960 --> 00:15:47.960
had a profit for 50 or 100 percent of them.

169
00:15:47.960 --> 00:15:51.200
Had the great family of the people flourished, said Taylor,

170
00:15:51.200 --> 00:15:55.200
they would not have failed, pay peace and trade, unquote.

171
00:15:55.200 --> 00:15:57.800
The industrialists wanted to revive what Taylor had called

172
00:15:57.800 --> 00:16:00.520
the, quote, property transferring policy

173
00:16:00.520 --> 00:16:04.060
which operated so delightfully in war, unquote.

174
00:16:04.060 --> 00:16:07.160
Taylor said, quote, it is a consequence of war

175
00:16:07.160 --> 00:16:10.360
to transfer property, and this has hitherto been considered

176
00:16:10.360 --> 00:16:13.000
one of its evils, unquote.

177
00:16:13.000 --> 00:16:17.700
But the Northern industrialists wanted to redefine redistribution as a virtue of war,

178
00:16:17.700 --> 00:16:21.720
with themselves on the receiving end of the loot, of course.

179
00:16:21.720 --> 00:16:26.080
A third great Old South free trade theorist was John C. Calhoun.

180
00:16:26.080 --> 00:16:30.300
He too denounced the tariff imposed by the Northern usurpers, quote,

181
00:16:30.300 --> 00:16:34.780
By a perversion of the powers of the Constitution, which was intended to protect the states of

182
00:16:34.780 --> 00:16:39.500
the Union and the enjoyment of their natural advantages, they have stripped us of the blessings

183
00:16:39.500 --> 00:16:44.900
and other things bestowed by nature and converted them to their own advantage, restore our advantages

184
00:16:44.900 --> 00:16:49.940
by giving us free trade with the world and we would become what they are now by our means

185
00:16:49.940 --> 00:16:55.740
the most flourishing people on the globe." Contrasting himself with his opponents, Calhoun

186
00:16:55.740 --> 00:17:02.340
said, quote, we want free trade, they restrictions. We want moderate taxes, frugality in the government,

187
00:17:02.340 --> 00:17:09.340
economic accountability and a rigid application of the public money to the payment of debt.

188
00:17:09.340 --> 00:17:13.640
Calhoun granted that the Constitution allowed the central government to impose a duty on

189
00:17:13.640 --> 00:17:20.260
imports for revenue purposes. But his analysis of power politics led him to believe that more

190
00:17:20.260 --> 00:17:25.580
was involved. Neither the tax imposed nor the revenue collected were being used for

191
00:17:25.580 --> 00:17:30.780
the general interest. They were being used by one group to destroy another. The tariff

192
00:17:30.780 --> 00:17:35.100
therefore violated the Constitution by benefiting one group at the expense of another without

193
00:17:35.100 --> 00:17:38.100
not the exploited group's consent.

194
00:17:38.100 --> 00:17:43.300
Calhoun was, in addition to all his other achievements, an impressive economic theorist.

195
00:17:43.300 --> 00:17:47.100
He defended free trade as necessary to the division of labor.

196
00:17:47.100 --> 00:17:51.660
As he explained, the South has, quote, from Soil and Climate, a facility in rearing certain

197
00:17:51.660 --> 00:17:56.340
great agricultural staples, while other and older countries, with dense population and

198
00:17:56.340 --> 00:18:01.820
capital greatly accumulated, have equal facility in manufacturing various articles suited to

199
00:18:01.820 --> 00:18:07.420
to our Use, and thus a foundation is laid for an exchange of the products of labor mutually

200
00:18:07.420 --> 00:18:08.420
advantageous."

201
00:18:08.420 --> 00:18:16.140
The tariff, he argued, acted as a tax on this trade, and a tax hurts the producer, he said,

202
00:18:16.140 --> 00:18:18.060
whether it is laid on the vendor or the purchaser.

203
00:18:18.060 --> 00:18:22.940
It doesn't matter whether the tax is a consumption tax or a production tax, in the end it hurts

204
00:18:22.940 --> 00:18:27.280
production because, as he said, the tax must always eat into profits and therefore future

205
00:18:27.280 --> 00:18:28.280
capital.

206
00:18:28.280 --> 00:18:34.800
The effect on us is to compel us to purchase at a higher price both what we obtain from

207
00:18:34.800 --> 00:18:41.560
them and from others without receiving a corresponding increase in the price of what we sell.

208
00:18:41.560 --> 00:18:45.520
Calhoun developed a unique way of thinking about the tariff that turned it into a populist

209
00:18:45.520 --> 00:18:46.520
issue.

210
00:18:46.520 --> 00:18:51.560
If the tariff is one-third, it is the same as the government taking one-third of what

211
00:18:51.560 --> 00:18:55.160
producers raise in cotton, rice and tobacco.

212
00:18:55.160 --> 00:18:58.640
Whether the goods are coming into the country or leaving at a tariff of one-third is a theft

213
00:18:58.640 --> 00:19:03.680
of one-third. To Calhoun this meant that one-third of the toil and labor of the people of the

214
00:19:03.680 --> 00:19:08.800
South was being transferred to the North to build Northern industry and to feed a hostile

215
00:19:08.800 --> 00:19:09.800
government.

216
00:19:09.800 --> 00:19:14.720
Quote, we are the serfs of the system, he announced, out of whose labor is raised not

217
00:19:14.720 --> 00:19:18.520
only the money paid into the treasury, but the funds out of which are drawn the rich

218
00:19:18.520 --> 00:19:24.480
rewards of the manufacturer and his associates in interest. Their encouragement is our discouragement.

219
00:19:24.480 --> 00:19:29.520
The survival of the South is at stake in this issue, we said.

220
00:19:29.520 --> 00:19:34.920
The last remains of our great and once-flourishing agriculture must be annihilated in the conflict.

221
00:19:34.920 --> 00:19:38.840
In the first instance, we will be thrown on the home market, which cannot consume a fourth

222
00:19:38.840 --> 00:19:43.920
of our products, and instead of supplying the world as we would with free trade, we

223
00:19:43.920 --> 00:19:48.000
would be compelled to abandon the cultivation of three-fourths of what we now raise and

224
00:19:48.000 --> 00:19:52.580
receive for the residue whatever manufacturers who would then have their policy consummated

225
00:19:52.580 --> 00:19:55.860
by the entire possession of our market might choose to give.

226
00:19:56.980 --> 00:19:58.500
Free trade, Calhoun believed,

227
00:19:58.500 --> 00:20:00.140
represented the ultimate safeguard

228
00:20:00.140 --> 00:20:02.180
of Southern political rights.

229
00:20:02.180 --> 00:20:05.620
Without such trade, the South would become a captive nation

230
00:20:05.620 --> 00:20:08.220
and served for a cabal of Northern industrialists

231
00:20:08.220 --> 00:20:11.980
tied to and dependent upon government power.

232
00:20:11.980 --> 00:20:12.940
His solution, of course,

233
00:20:12.940 --> 00:20:14.980
was to assert the right of interposition,

234
00:20:14.980 --> 00:20:16.980
whereby South Carolina would stand as a buffer

235
00:20:16.980 --> 00:20:19.900
between the individual and the central government.

236
00:20:19.900 --> 00:20:22.500
To protect the Constitution, that is, Calhoun advocated,

237
00:20:22.500 --> 00:20:30.060
Disobedience to the Central Government Let's compare Calhoun's arguments against

238
00:20:30.060 --> 00:20:34.420
the tariff of abominations with Jefferson's summary view.

239
00:20:34.420 --> 00:20:37.780
Both argued against violations of free trade.

240
00:20:37.780 --> 00:20:41.140
Both argued against a centralized government.

241
00:20:41.140 --> 00:20:44.920
Both argued that tariffs were taxation without representation.

242
00:20:44.920 --> 00:20:49.340
Both argued that this is tyranny, and both argued that radical means were justified in

243
00:20:49.340 --> 00:20:51.920
overthrowing the oppressor.

244
00:20:51.920 --> 00:20:55.080
This is one of the reasons that the founding fathers of the Confederacy felt themselves

245
00:20:55.080 --> 00:20:57.920
to be the heirs of the original founders.

246
00:20:57.920 --> 00:21:02.260
Tariff taxes precipitated both independence movements, and both were based on the view

247
00:21:02.260 --> 00:21:06.400
that liberty, free trade, and nationalism were of a piece.

248
00:21:06.400 --> 00:21:10.880
If Randolph, Taylor, Calhoun, and their followers had been able to repeal the tariffs and prevent

249
00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:15.120
their reimposition, the war between the states might never have occurred.

250
00:21:15.120 --> 00:21:19.560
Our best young men might not have died, and our nation might still be free.

251
00:21:19.560 --> 00:21:28.560
Instead, after a reprieve in 1833, the central government engaged in more and more trade protectionism and centralized tyranny, which helped lead to war.

252
00:21:28.560 --> 00:21:42.560
In his seldom quoted first inaugural address, or I guess I should say seldom quoted except here, Abraham Lincoln pledged no, quote, no bloodshed or violence, but he also promised to, quote, collect the duties in the impost no matter what.

253
00:21:42.560 --> 00:21:48.560
He effectively announced he planned to tax the South to death, and as soon as he was able to do so,

254
00:21:48.560 --> 00:21:54.560
Lincoln imposed the highest tariff in U.S. history, doubling the rates to 48%.

255
00:21:54.560 --> 00:21:59.560
It's no wonder that when Edmund Ruffin fired the first shot in the beginning of the war between the states,

256
00:21:59.560 --> 00:22:04.560
he aimed at a customs house for some time.

257
00:22:04.560 --> 00:22:18.780
The war is also appropriately called the War of Northern Aggression, and one aggression

258
00:22:18.780 --> 00:22:22.400
occurred in 1861 with the passage of the Morrill Tariff.

259
00:22:22.400 --> 00:22:26.520
South made the choice for liberty through secession and the Confederate Constitution

260
00:22:26.520 --> 00:22:30.320
a marvelous document, specifically for bad high tariffs.

261
00:22:30.320 --> 00:22:36.860
The beginning of the war, a revealing Boston newspaper editorial accused the South of the

262
00:22:36.860 --> 00:22:41.740
gravest crime of all, which the editorial has called the cause of the war.

263
00:22:41.740 --> 00:22:46.920
The South, said the editorial, wanted a system, quote, verging on free trade.

264
00:22:46.920 --> 00:22:50.660
If the Southern Confederation is allowed to carry out a policy by which only a nominal

265
00:22:50.660 --> 00:22:55.840
duty is laid upon imports, no doubt the business of the chief northern cities will be seriously

266
00:22:55.840 --> 00:22:56.840
injured.

267
00:22:56.840 --> 00:23:01.840
Alas, the South was not allowed to carry out its policy of free trade, and the nation paid

268
00:23:01.840 --> 00:23:07.640
a terrible price. It is a price that we are obviously still paying. And we're repeating

269
00:23:07.640 --> 00:23:13.680
the same errors with regard to current trade policy. Despite the rhetoric we hear from

270
00:23:13.680 --> 00:23:18.840
Washington, there's no threat that free trade is going to break out any time soon. A true

271
00:23:18.840 --> 00:23:23.000
regime of free trade, as Murray Rothbard has pointed out, would be greeted by Washington,

272
00:23:23.000 --> 00:23:28.480
DC with about the same enthusiasm as a repeal of the income tax.

273
00:23:28.480 --> 00:23:32.140
Let's consider the linguistic categories that govern the great trade debates of our time

274
00:23:32.140 --> 00:23:37.960
NAFTA and GATT. The media and the government have successfully created a political split

275
00:23:37.960 --> 00:23:43.880
of Manichean proportions. On one side we have the representatives of pure light, multinational

276
00:23:43.880 --> 00:23:49.080
corporations, every executive branch agency, the leaders of both parties in both houses

277
00:23:49.080 --> 00:23:54.920
of Congress, the media, all the ex-presidents, respected public intellectuals, beltway think

278
00:23:54.920 --> 00:24:00.600
tanks, professors at every top university, sort of the trilateral commission, right?

279
00:24:00.600 --> 00:24:06.200
They're called the free traders. On the other side, we have almost everyone else. Public

280
00:24:06.200 --> 00:24:10.760
opinion has been solidly against both NAFTA and GATT, at least before it has been shaped

281
00:24:10.760 --> 00:24:16.440
by those on the other side. We can add to the public a handful of columnists and academics

282
00:24:16.440 --> 00:24:20.600
who have actually bothered to look at the documents in question.

283
00:24:20.600 --> 00:24:26.200
The people of light say that this latter group represents the forces of darkness, isolationists,

284
00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:31.300
nationalists, reactionary opponents of free trade and progress.

285
00:24:31.300 --> 00:24:36.120
Let's look at how this reality changes this conventional grouping.

286
00:24:36.120 --> 00:24:40.640
NAFTA established a trade bloc primarily to benefit government-connected corporations

287
00:24:40.640 --> 00:24:42.320
and banking interests.

288
00:24:42.320 --> 00:24:48.820
It invested new powers in the executive to interfere with trade from non-North American nations.

289
00:24:48.820 --> 00:24:53.820
It's a natural consequence of NAFTA that the U.S. government would threaten trade war with Japan.

290
00:24:53.820 --> 00:25:00.820
It's a natural consequence of NAFTA that the U.S. would set up a multi-billion dollar fund to support the Mexican peso.

291
00:25:00.820 --> 00:25:06.820
It's a natural consequence of NAFTA that unprecedented levels of foreign aid would flow to Mexico City.

292
00:25:06.820 --> 00:25:11.820
Like Hamilton's domestic policy, NAFTA is status to the core.

293
00:25:11.820 --> 00:25:16.820
It tells us that we cannot reduce regulations on labor and the environment to attract investment.

294
00:25:16.820 --> 00:25:25.820
Not only that, the Congressional Research Service tells us that under NAFTA, we cannot reduce regulations on labor and the environment even to retain investment.

295
00:25:25.820 --> 00:25:33.820
The Labor CIDA Court tells us we are to have equal wages between men and women, which not even Hamilton would have favored imposing by executive fiat.

296
00:25:33.820 --> 00:25:37.820
The NAFTAites tell us that we retain our sovereignty under NAFTA.

297
00:25:37.820 --> 00:25:52.820
That's partially true. We retain our sovereignty to increase restrictions on business, to increase labor and environmental regulations, but we do not retain our rights to reduce them without monetary and trade penalties from tri-national secretariats.

298
00:25:52.820 --> 00:26:02.820
NAFTA is imperialist. It preaches to other countries about what kinds of laws and regulations they should have, the social democratic mixed economy that's impoverishing us.

299
00:26:02.820 --> 00:26:08.420
NAFTA is of course not the free trade of Jefferson, Randolph, Taylor and Calhoun. It is trade

300
00:26:08.420 --> 00:26:13.460
for the few and not the many, for the particular interest and not the general interest. What

301
00:26:13.460 --> 00:26:19.100
about GATT and the World Trade Organization it proposes to establish? Same is true. It

302
00:26:19.100 --> 00:26:24.120
is sold as free trade, yet it represents something else entirely. It enshrines the principle

303
00:26:24.120 --> 00:26:30.020
of manipulating economies by demand-side management. It embraces so-called sustainable development,

304
00:26:30.020 --> 00:26:46.020
The World Trade Organization comes complete with a new ministerial conference, a director general, a secretariat, a plethora of committees, councils, and review bodies in a bunch of very fancy new office buildings in Geneva.

305
00:26:46.020 --> 00:26:57.020
WTO's mission will not be the lowering of trade barriers, but rather its stated goal of, quote, achieving greater coherence in global economic policymaking, unquote.

306
00:26:57.020 --> 00:27:01.900
As U.S. Trade Representative Mickey Cantor was toasting the end of the GATT negotiations

307
00:27:01.900 --> 00:27:06.820
in December, the New York Times hailed the WTO as the trade equivalent of the World Bank

308
00:27:06.820 --> 00:27:09.220
and the International Monetary Fund.

309
00:27:09.220 --> 00:27:14.660
Jefferson, Randolph, Taylor and Calhoun were right.

310
00:27:14.660 --> 00:27:17.660
Centralized government is the tyrant, we are its serfs.

311
00:27:17.660 --> 00:27:22.540
These free trade revolutionaries found the remedy to Tyrian serfdom in a love of liberty

312
00:27:22.540 --> 00:27:26.620
and a willingness to fight for it and into passionate nationalism.

313
00:27:26.620 --> 00:27:31.220
For Jefferson, Randolph, Taylor and Calhoun, nationalism was the force powerful enough

314
00:27:31.220 --> 00:27:36.480
to rally the public against distant rulers. But their nationalism was not directed against

315
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:42.180
any other country, and free trade was a key to this. As Cool at Calhoun said when he wrote

316
00:27:42.180 --> 00:27:48.500
to the Manchester Anti-Corn Law League in 1845, quote, I regard free trade as involving

317
00:27:48.500 --> 00:27:54.260
considerations far higher than mere commercial advantages as great as they are. It is, in

318
00:27:54.260 --> 00:27:59.740
In my opinion, emphatically the cause of civilization and peace.

319
00:27:59.740 --> 00:28:01.900
But civilization and peace are threatened.

320
00:28:01.900 --> 00:28:05.100
In Jefferson's day, the tyranny was centered in the British crown.

321
00:28:05.100 --> 00:28:09.260
In our day, the tyranny is centered in Washington D.C. and in New York and in Geneva.

322
00:28:09.260 --> 00:28:14.460
We're surrounded by D.C. bureaucrats, NAFTA bureaucrats, U.N. bureaucrats, bureaucrats

323
00:28:14.460 --> 00:28:19.460
from the World Bank and the IMF and assorted scallywags in the pay of the governing elites.

324
00:28:19.460 --> 00:28:35.460
If we are to restore liberty, limited and local government, free enterprise and yes, free trade, we must begin by understanding the power that a legitimate regionalism and an old-fashioned nationalism will have in uniting us against the forces of central control.

325
00:28:35.460 --> 00:28:44.460
In doing so, we will stand with the author of the Declaration of Independence, with the Republicans of the Old South, and with the signers of the Confederate Constitution.

326
00:28:44.460 --> 00:28:50.460
Eventually, perhaps, we may also have to stand with Edmund Ruffin.