WEBVTT

NOTE The Culture War

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:11.000
This talk and the one immediately following by my good friend Eugene Sledge, a former United States Marine,

2
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:21.000
I think you'll find illuminating about what actually happens in war, which is by no means an abstraction.

3
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:28.000
My friends and I sometimes play a game that you might enjoy too.

4
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:52.000
We call it oxymoron. The object is to come up with phrases which, while superficially plausible, prove on skeptical examination to involve intellectually comical contradictions in terms, like, for example, creation science.

5
00:00:52.000 --> 00:01:01.200
How about the journalistic ethics?

6
00:01:01.200 --> 00:01:07.680
That's right up there with the Maoist concept of a cultural revolution.

7
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:18.160
How about the phrase scholar-athlete, or, looking toward the university faculty instead

8
00:01:18.160 --> 00:01:26.760
of the Students, the phrase Scholar Activist. That's actually a phrase the Washington Post

9
00:01:26.760 --> 00:01:32.880
saw no contradiction in when it recently designated that way the newly appointed president of

10
00:01:32.880 --> 00:01:40.200
the University of the District of Columbia. And speaking of that sort of thing, some deeply

11
00:01:40.200 --> 00:01:47.880
cynical players of this game oxymoron contemplating the compromised, uncertain and sentimental

12
00:01:47.880 --> 00:02:05.880
The title, sane, of much of the higher learning today might go so far as to propose as the winning oxymoron the phrase, college education.

13
00:02:05.880 --> 00:02:13.880
Now I start this way because my title, The Culture of War, might be regarded as that kind of flagrant oxymoron.

14
00:02:13.880 --> 00:02:21.880
And so it would be if I were invoking the term culture in any artistic or intellectual sense,

15
00:02:21.880 --> 00:02:29.880
implying within the armed forces a considerable amount of viola playing, classical acting,

16
00:02:29.880 --> 00:02:38.880
liberal drawing and painting and modeling, poetry and fiction writing, and difficult reading.

17
00:02:38.880 --> 00:02:43.880
But actually, it's not things like that I'm trying to suggest by the word culture.

18
00:02:43.880 --> 00:02:50.880
I'm using it in a quasi-anthropological sense, the way T.S. Eliot used it when he wrote a book called

19
00:02:50.880 --> 00:02:58.880
Notes Towards the Definition of Culture, a book in which he considered the possibility of a healthy and interesting society

20
00:02:58.880 --> 00:03:03.880
based on something like religious principles.

21
00:03:03.880 --> 00:03:27.880
In that book, Eliot understands how much, as he puts it, how much is embraced by the term culture, a term designating not merely artistic or ennobling activities, but the general forms and usages and techniques of a given society, including military society.

22
00:03:27.880 --> 00:03:39.380
To Eliot, culture includes, as he says, all the characteristic activities and interests of a people, and using the British people and their culture as his examples.

23
00:03:39.380 --> 00:03:57.380
He goes on to instance, as components of British culture, these things, Derby Day, Henley regatta, dog racing, dark boards, boiled cabbage cut into sections, a rather disgusting idea, surely.

24
00:03:57.380 --> 00:04:08.380
19th century gothic churches and the music of Sir Edward Elgar, and he adds the reader can make his own list.

25
00:04:08.380 --> 00:04:14.380
Well, in the same way, probably any one of us could make a list of things comprising the culture of war.

26
00:04:14.380 --> 00:04:26.380
But at the outset, I should warn you that the items I'll mention are collected not by any military strategist or theoretician or historian or scholar.

27
00:04:26.380 --> 00:04:34.580
There are the views, some of them doubtless embittered, of a superannuated, badly wounded

28
00:04:34.580 --> 00:04:41.380
former infantry lieutenant, a one-time rifle platoon leader who fought the Second World

29
00:04:41.380 --> 00:04:50.340
War in Europe, commanding 40 terrified young Americans, many of whom were killed or cruelly

30
00:04:50.340 --> 00:04:51.340
wounded.

31
00:04:51.340 --> 00:05:03.060
Thus, if the word culture presents some problems, the word war will present even more.

32
00:05:03.060 --> 00:05:08.680
The truth is that very few people know anything about war.

33
00:05:08.680 --> 00:05:15.420
In an infantry division, for example, fewer than half the troops actually fight, that

34
00:05:15.420 --> 00:05:22.020
Mises with rifles, mortars, machine guns, grenades, and trench knives.

35
00:05:22.020 --> 00:05:28.020
The others, thousands on thousands of them, are occupied with truck driving, mimeograph

36
00:05:28.020 --> 00:05:37.020
machine operating, cooking and baking, ammunition and ration supplying, and similar housekeeping

37
00:05:37.020 --> 00:05:39.020
tasks.

38
00:05:39.020 --> 00:05:45.540
Now those things are no doubt necessary, but they're hardly bellicose, and they hardly

39
00:05:45.540 --> 00:05:51.340
provide the sort of experience which can issue as trustworthy testimony about what the word

40
00:05:51.340 --> 00:05:53.800
war might mean.

41
00:05:53.800 --> 00:05:59.300
This is a reason why most combat veterans tend to smile cynically and sardonically

42
00:05:59.300 --> 00:06:06.020
at veterans' reunions when those reunions are attended by very large numbers.

43
00:06:06.020 --> 00:06:16.980
For most soldiers participating in the Second World War, the war meant inconvenience, rising

44
00:06:16.980 --> 00:06:25.580
sometimes to hardship, enforced travel and residence abroad, unappetizing food, absence

45
00:06:25.580 --> 00:06:32.900
of tablecloths, and often bedsheets. But for those unlucky enough to be in the forward combat

46
00:06:32.900 --> 00:06:42.580
Units, the war meant death or maiming and in extraordinarily dirty and undignified circumstances.

47
00:06:42.580 --> 00:06:49.540
At the very least, for most it meant a rapid and shocking metamorphosis from boyhood innocence

48
00:06:49.540 --> 00:06:55.300
to adult cynicism and bitterness.

49
00:06:55.300 --> 00:07:02.860
is an experience remembered vividly even at this distance that has inducted me into my

50
00:07:02.860 --> 00:07:06.820
understanding of the culture of war.

51
00:07:06.820 --> 00:07:13.280
It is a culture hard for civilians to understand, and it's not their fault that they can't,

52
00:07:13.280 --> 00:07:21.140
because civilians occupy a world, thank God, which is in large part rational and predictable,

53
00:07:21.140 --> 00:07:26.020
A world which makes sense in an old-fashioned way.

54
00:07:26.020 --> 00:07:27.740
Now let me illustrate what I mean.

55
00:07:27.740 --> 00:07:34.140
A while ago, I was telephoned by a lawyer in New York City.

56
00:07:34.140 --> 00:07:40.540
He indicated that he was conducting a course for cadets at West Point, a course in the

57
00:07:40.540 --> 00:07:45.420
relation between language and violence.

58
00:07:45.420 --> 00:07:50.300
This course focused on the deformations of language required for the registration of

59
00:07:50.300 --> 00:07:54.300
of Non-Rational Violent Behavior

60
00:08:20.300 --> 00:08:28.200
For example, what euphemisms, if any, were employed in these after-action reports?

61
00:08:28.200 --> 00:08:35.020
What were the temptations that I felt to provide rational motives for violent or inexplicable

62
00:08:35.020 --> 00:08:36.020
events?

63
00:08:36.020 --> 00:08:47.540
As this phone call went on, I confessed to an outburst of extreme angry discourtesy, the

64
00:08:47.540 --> 00:08:55.540
The sort of thing that's common among infantrymen reinstalled in an optimistic and unimaginative civilian culture.

65
00:08:55.540 --> 00:09:01.540
I asked with some passion, I asked this lawyer, have you ever been in combat?

66
00:09:01.540 --> 00:09:03.540
He answered, no.

67
00:09:03.540 --> 00:09:13.540
I then explained with elaborate sarcasm that I never heard of such things as after-action reports from small assault units.

68
00:09:13.540 --> 00:09:26.660
How, after all, could one pull oneself together to compose an after-action report with pencil

69
00:09:26.660 --> 00:09:34.060
and paper when you had the following after-action features to attend to?

70
00:09:34.060 --> 00:09:41.300
First, the question of what to do when the six German prisoners the assault has just

71
00:09:41.300 --> 00:09:42.700
yielded.

72
00:09:42.700 --> 00:09:48.700
How can one keep a very angry private who had seen his buddy's eye shot out from doing

73
00:09:48.700 --> 00:09:53.700
what he very much wanted to do, to kill all the prisoners?

74
00:09:53.700 --> 00:09:59.000
Second, after action you had to clean up the mess.

75
00:09:59.000 --> 00:10:04.500
This meant taking care of the wounded, some of whom were in intense pain and the morphine

76
00:10:04.500 --> 00:10:07.300
is already exhausted.

77
00:10:07.300 --> 00:10:15.540
Three. After action, you had to reposition your soldiers to repel a German counter-attack,

78
00:10:15.540 --> 00:10:23.220
and you had to jolly them up to make them want to continue fighting the war in the prescribed manner.

79
00:10:23.220 --> 00:10:32.340
Fighting the war after action is going to be very difficult because your sergeant is over there crying.

80
00:10:32.340 --> 00:10:39.940
Fourth, how could a junior officer like me write an after-action report when his hand was covered

81
00:10:39.940 --> 00:10:45.540
with the blood of one of his men whose wound in the back I had ineffectively tried to bandage

82
00:10:46.100 --> 00:10:54.260
while the bullets and shell fragments were flying around? Given all this, and this is item five,

83
00:10:54.260 --> 00:11:01.300
given all this, how could such a person have waited a day or so to file his after-action report

84
00:11:01.300 --> 00:11:06.260
In a calmer mood, when a third of the men whose testimony would be required were gone,

85
00:11:06.260 --> 00:11:10.020
killed or wounded, and where would he find the quiet to write it?

86
00:11:11.060 --> 00:11:15.300
By that time he'd be engaged in further violence himself.

87
00:11:16.820 --> 00:11:24.740
The point is that producing after-action reports is the privilege of leaders who are non-combatants,

88
00:11:24.740 --> 00:11:33.580
and the usefulness and authenticity of such reports can already be sensed to be adjacent

89
00:11:33.580 --> 00:11:37.980
to the usefulness of works of fiction.

90
00:11:37.980 --> 00:11:46.460
My point is less that than the instructive naiveté of the lawyer, a very representative

91
00:11:46.460 --> 00:11:48.140
human being.

92
00:11:48.140 --> 00:11:52.500
One would expect a lawyer in New York City, especially, to be quite sophisticated about

93
00:11:52.500 --> 00:11:54.700
the facts of life.

94
00:11:54.700 --> 00:12:01.160
And here is one who imagined that the conduct of combat was rational.

95
00:12:01.160 --> 00:12:08.480
He was a victim of what I call inappropriate rationalism, with a bit of inappropriate optimism

96
00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:09.480
as well.

97
00:12:09.480 --> 00:12:18.620
Those who find it hard to understand how often soldiers kill their own comrades, I'm talking

98
00:12:18.620 --> 00:12:26.380
about Friendly Fire episodes are victims of the same intellectual and emotional error.

99
00:12:26.380 --> 00:12:33.420
The culture of war, in short, is not like the culture of ordinary peacetime life.

100
00:12:33.420 --> 00:12:41.300
It's a culture dominated by fear and blood and sadism, by irrational actions and preposterous

101
00:12:41.300 --> 00:12:44.400
and usually ironic results.

102
00:12:44.400 --> 00:12:50.840
It has more relation to science fiction or to ironic theater than to actual life, and

103
00:12:50.840 --> 00:12:55.560
that makes it hard to describe it.

104
00:12:55.560 --> 00:13:01.500
If you like, you can regard what I've said about this bizarre and ignorant concern with

105
00:13:01.500 --> 00:13:03.960
after action reports.

106
00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:09.120
If you like, you can regard it as just another bureaucratic intrusion into a place where such

107
00:13:09.120 --> 00:13:15.120
intrusion is entirely inappropriate, and even worse, stupid.

108
00:13:15.120 --> 00:13:20.980
It's especially unfortunate because it simply underlines the unpleasant facts of the military

109
00:13:20.980 --> 00:13:23.220
class system.

110
00:13:23.220 --> 00:13:29.080
On the one hand, remote and privileged staffs and administrators.

111
00:13:29.080 --> 00:13:37.080
On the other, the troops, mostly sad conscripts, we must remember, the troops who must do the

112
00:13:37.080 --> 00:13:46.980
The distance between serious survivors of World War II fighting and optimistic onlookers can

113
00:13:46.980 --> 00:13:52.300
be measured by a current controversy in Britain.

114
00:13:52.300 --> 00:13:57.720
This controversy is between veterans of the Second World War and the government.

115
00:13:57.720 --> 00:14:03.280
The veterans want D-Day commemorated with solemnity and sorrow.

116
00:14:03.280 --> 00:14:10.600
After all, it marked the beginning of a battle in which 37,000 people, most of them pathetically

117
00:14:10.600 --> 00:14:13.800
young, were killed.

118
00:14:13.800 --> 00:14:18.920
The government, avid for tourist dollars, takes a different approach.

119
00:14:18.920 --> 00:14:28.560
It proposes not a commemoration, but a celebration involving street parties, dances, cute reenactments,

120
00:14:28.560 --> 00:14:45.560
The Quarrel is between those who know the culture of war and those who think they know it, or who are prepared to profit from a misrepresentation of it.

121
00:14:45.560 --> 00:14:50.560
In between these two groups, a reconciliation is hardly possible.

122
00:14:50.560 --> 00:14:56.480
A spokesman for the veterans in this quarrel has said the event is being trivialized.

123
00:14:56.480 --> 00:15:02.760
Those who actually took part feel it was just a battle, albeit a successful one.

124
00:15:02.760 --> 00:15:11.360
Many of their comrades lost their lives in the process, and many ladies were widowed.

125
00:15:11.360 --> 00:15:17.440
That the Allies won the Second World War doesn't oblige us to be cheerful about it.

126
00:15:17.440 --> 00:15:24.080
Wars are won by distinction in the techniques of mass murder, and that's hardly something

127
00:15:24.080 --> 00:15:32.280
for people pretending to civilization to be proud of. Tolstoy's words are worth recalling.

128
00:15:32.280 --> 00:15:37.440
War, he said, is not a polite recreation, but the vilest thing in life, and we ought

129
00:15:37.440 --> 00:15:44.840
to understand that and not play at war. It will be years, perhaps decades, before it

130
00:15:44.840 --> 00:15:50.280
It becomes clear whether the Cold War was really necessary, or was a gratifying and

131
00:15:50.280 --> 00:15:57.400
profitable playing at war, whose beneficiaries were not the people of the earth, but the

132
00:15:57.400 --> 00:16:05.560
makers of armaments designed to become rapidly obsolete and quickly replaceable.

133
00:16:05.560 --> 00:16:12.560
If focusing the economy on armaments bankrupted the Soviet Union, think what it did to the

134
00:16:12.560 --> 00:16:20.660
Thus, if the culture of war solidifies those who fight and alienates them from those who

135
00:16:20.660 --> 00:16:26.360
do not, it has other regrettable aspects.

136
00:16:26.360 --> 00:16:30.280
One of them is censorship.

137
00:16:30.280 --> 00:16:36.740
War kills people, obviously, and the culture of war does not, but the culture of war kills

138
00:16:36.740 --> 00:16:42.740
Freedom is something precious and indispensable in a civilized society, that is freedom of

139
00:16:42.740 --> 00:16:47.740
utterance, freedom of curiosity, freedom of knowledge.

140
00:16:47.740 --> 00:16:54.460
Recently, I think you're going to like this, recently an official of the Pentagon explained

141
00:16:54.460 --> 00:17:02.720
why the military had censored some TV footage depicting Iraqi soldiers cut in half by automatic

142
00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:12.880
Fire for U.S. Helicopters. He explained, if we let people see that kind of thing, there

143
00:17:12.880 --> 00:17:25.680
would never again be any war. I got that quotation from a comical gift book titled, The Seven

144
00:17:25.680 --> 00:17:34.400
176 stupidest things ever said.

145
00:17:34.400 --> 00:17:42.920
But that remark, of course, is far from stupid, it is very true, and its implications spread

146
00:17:42.920 --> 00:17:45.280
very far.

147
00:17:45.280 --> 00:17:51.540
It's obvious that tight censorship is a necessity in any modern war.

148
00:17:51.540 --> 00:17:57.200
It's usually rationalized by the need to keep the enemy in the dark about our plans, but

149
00:17:57.200 --> 00:18:04.200
it's also valuable to conceal military blunders and fatalities and war crimes from a public

150
00:18:04.200 --> 00:18:07.540
that in the absence of censorship might learn to be critical.

151
00:18:07.540 --> 00:18:14.620
And my point is this, if you are trained to be uncritical of the military, you can easily

152
00:18:14.620 --> 00:18:21.180
go just a little bit further and learn to be uncritical of government and of authority

153
00:18:21.180 --> 00:18:24.740
and of all established and received institutions.

154
00:18:24.740 --> 00:18:30.260
The result is, of course, the death of the mind, the transformation of the higher learning

155
00:18:30.260 --> 00:18:37.580
and independent scholarship into a cheering section for whatever popular notions and superstitions

156
00:18:37.580 --> 00:18:41.540
prevail at the moment.

157
00:18:41.540 --> 00:18:48.260
During wartime and during the cold wartime, we've all had to pretend that the military

158
00:18:48.260 --> 00:18:55.620
is a force for some kind of social good. I wonder if it is. Is the habit of unthinking

159
00:18:55.620 --> 00:19:02.860
obedience a good one to instill in young Americans? For one thing clear about the culture of war

160
00:19:02.860 --> 00:19:08.740
is that it's necessarily an obedience culture. And as one critic has noticed of armies in

161
00:19:08.740 --> 00:19:14.620
general, in organizations where there must be unquestioning obedience, there must be

162
00:19:14.620 --> 00:19:17.300
and a passive injustice.

163
00:19:17.300 --> 00:19:22.580
And not just that, the obedience culture is certain over the long run to shrivel originality

164
00:19:22.580 --> 00:19:31.260
and constrict thought, to encourage witless adaptation and social dishonesty.

165
00:19:31.260 --> 00:19:37.540
The culture of war is the only culture where the concept of morale is crucial.

166
00:19:37.540 --> 00:19:40.580
And that's a significant point.

167
00:19:40.580 --> 00:19:46.620
Money is crucial in the culture of war because at all times the troops are engaging in activities

168
00:19:46.620 --> 00:19:52.220
sure to undermine cheerfulness and hope. They are either being bored picking up cigarette

169
00:19:52.220 --> 00:19:58.080
butts or they are being dehumanized by killing their fellow creatures, who like them are

170
00:19:58.080 --> 00:20:03.820
for the most part helpless conscripts who have done nothing for which they deserve to

171
00:20:03.820 --> 00:20:08.680
be blown to bits.

172
00:20:08.680 --> 00:20:17.860
In wartime culture, censorship has the assistance of general euphemism and programmatically

173
00:20:17.860 --> 00:20:26.960
inaccurate language. Before long we are calling war making peace keeping and believing it.

174
00:20:26.960 --> 00:20:34.360
What used to be designated aerial bombing has been euphemized into airstrikes and even

175
00:20:34.360 --> 00:20:41.160
Surgical Airstrikes, dishonestly implying a degree of accuracy which will make combat

176
00:20:41.160 --> 00:20:44.400
veterans laugh out loud.

177
00:20:44.400 --> 00:20:52.140
Originally artillery or mortar shells fired by mistake at our own troops were called terrible

178
00:20:52.140 --> 00:20:57.400
mistakes or tragic errors.

179
00:20:57.400 --> 00:21:08.440
Then a euphemism was devised, incontinent ordinance, and finally some Pentagon genius

180
00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:14.340
hit upon the warmer and cozier term, friendly fire.

181
00:21:14.340 --> 00:21:21.120
During the Gulf War, friendly fire caused over one-third of the American casualties.

182
00:21:21.120 --> 00:21:26.400
Twenty-three percent of the American dead died from friendly fire.

183
00:21:26.400 --> 00:21:31.840
Fifteen percent of the American wounded were wounded by friendly fire.

184
00:21:31.840 --> 00:21:35.760
Now, of course, blunders are the very essence of war.

185
00:21:35.760 --> 00:21:43.280
This is why the culture of war is so far removed from the culture of predictability and rationality.

186
00:21:43.280 --> 00:21:48.560
Soldiers know that blunders are the very essence of war,

187
00:21:48.560 --> 00:21:54.480
Because they know what's likely to happen when you arm a lot of frightened boys with deadly weapons,

188
00:21:54.480 --> 00:22:06.000
but the public must not be told, lest their simple faith in military authority and rationality be shaken.

189
00:22:06.000 --> 00:22:15.840
Transforming the ugly and shocking into the noble and bright is the business of the most popular illustrated history of the Second World War.

190
00:22:15.840 --> 00:22:34.200
In those volumes, clear and noble cause and purpose are assigned systematically to events

191
00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:39.680
which are really accidental or which are embarrassingly demeaning.

192
00:22:39.680 --> 00:22:44.840
Readers of those books are insulted by being presumed to be incapable of confronting the

193
00:22:44.840 --> 00:22:53.840
In truth, everything must be transformed into fairy tales of heroism, success and nobility.

194
00:22:53.840 --> 00:22:59.160
That series of books has thus conveyed to the credulous a satisfying, orderly, wholesome

195
00:22:59.160 --> 00:23:05.680
and optimistic view of catastrophic occurrences, like for example the shooting down of hundreds

196
00:23:05.680 --> 00:23:11.800
of American paratroopers during the invasion of Sicily by frightened and undisciplined

197
00:23:11.800 --> 00:23:18.760
American sailors convinced that the large airplanes flying overhead held enemy troops.

198
00:23:18.760 --> 00:23:24.480
The presentation of war by such dishonest means is a fine way, actually, to encourage

199
00:23:24.480 --> 00:23:30.480
a moralistic, nationalistic and bellicose international politics.

200
00:23:30.480 --> 00:23:41.700
Now, it's customary to maintain that American wars are all fought on behalf of freedom.

201
00:23:41.700 --> 00:23:56.700
There is few notice that for the sake of freedom, millions of young men are enslaved for years, shying hide by conscription into a life whose every dimension is at odds with the idea of freedom.

202
00:23:56.700 --> 00:24:06.260
Flags, uniforms, bugle calls, band music, all the trappings of military glory hardly

203
00:24:06.260 --> 00:24:12.540
suffice to persuade the hapless conscript that he is involved in the defense of freedom,

204
00:24:12.540 --> 00:24:17.980
especially when his weekend pass has just been canceled at the last minute in payment

205
00:24:17.980 --> 00:24:23.700
for a heartfelt satiric remark which his sergeant has just overheard.

206
00:24:23.700 --> 00:24:37.220
Indeed, the culture of war is hardly separable from the culture of chickenshit, to invoke

207
00:24:37.220 --> 00:24:43.420
a rude term which I hope will offend no one here, all of whom I take to be expert in the

208
00:24:43.420 --> 00:24:48.420
facts of life, in addition to the facts of economics.

209
00:24:48.420 --> 00:24:53.320
During the Second World War, an Australian poet, John Manifold, wrote a poem titled

210
00:24:53.320 --> 00:25:01.440
Ration Party. It dramatizes the irony of slaves in uniform defending freedom, and it adds

211
00:25:01.440 --> 00:25:08.060
the irony by being a sonnet of poetic kind normally associated with delicate or beautiful

212
00:25:08.060 --> 00:25:09.060
sentiments.

213
00:25:09.060 --> 00:25:14.140
Here is his poem, Ration Party.

214
00:25:14.140 --> 00:25:19.300
Across the mud the line drags on and on.

215
00:25:19.300 --> 00:25:25.540
Tread slithers, footholds fails, all ardors vanish.

216
00:25:25.540 --> 00:25:33.380
Rain falls, the barking NCOs admonish the universe more than the lagging men.

217
00:25:33.380 --> 00:25:37.460
Something like an infinity of men plods up the slope.

218
00:25:37.460 --> 00:25:44.860
The file will never finish, for all their toil serves only to replenish stores for tomorrow's

219
00:25:44.860 --> 00:25:48.260
labors to begin.

220
00:25:48.260 --> 00:25:55.740
Absurd to think that liberty, the splendid nude of our dreams, the intercessory saint

221
00:25:55.740 --> 00:26:01.980
for us to judgment, needs to be defended by sick, fatigued men brimming with complaint

222
00:26:01.980 --> 00:26:13.240
and Misery, who bear till all is ended every imaginable pattern of restraint.

223
00:26:13.240 --> 00:26:19.300
Now the final thing I want to point out about the culture of war is that it is necessarily

224
00:26:19.300 --> 00:26:27.820
and resolutely only adversarial, only dualistic.

225
00:26:27.820 --> 00:26:35.420
We are here, the enemy is over there, and a no-man's land, either literal or figurative,

226
00:26:35.420 --> 00:26:39.300
as in ideology, divides us.

227
00:26:39.300 --> 00:26:45.340
The divisiveness at home, occasioned by the Vietnam War, is an example, and that divisiveness,

228
00:26:45.340 --> 00:26:49.020
as you're aware, almost ruined this country.

229
00:26:49.020 --> 00:26:50.020
You remember how it went.

230
00:26:50.020 --> 00:26:54.900
If you opposed the war, you were dishonoring the flag, and were practically a traitor.

231
00:26:54.900 --> 00:27:02.020
If you favored the war, you were a true American. You had thus to be either a dove or a hawk.

232
00:27:02.020 --> 00:27:09.560
Take your choice. No room for compromise, conciliation, or even very subtle discussion.

233
00:27:09.560 --> 00:27:15.600
If you were not for the war, you must be for communism. It was that attitude that finally

234
00:27:15.600 --> 00:27:19.560
brought down the Nixon White House.

235
00:27:19.560 --> 00:27:29.960
If earlier invasion or physical pressure against American territory would lead to war, now

236
00:27:29.960 --> 00:27:33.520
the U.S. became kissing her eyes.

237
00:27:33.520 --> 00:27:40.580
Now threats to American, quote, national interest were a sufficient reason for sending the troops

238
00:27:40.580 --> 00:27:43.260
into bloody action.

239
00:27:43.260 --> 00:27:50.920
National interest is constitutionally an interesting term because it is legally meaningless and

240
00:27:50.920 --> 00:27:58.820
constitutionally undefinable, hence popular.

241
00:27:58.820 --> 00:28:06.140
The evanescent phrase the national interest is the best gift ever awarded to those Americans

242
00:28:06.140 --> 00:28:12.080
who are neurotically bellicose, but who like Henry Kissinger always seem to avoid being

243
00:28:12.080 --> 00:28:19.320
on the front line, preferring to serve their country by getting others to drop bombs on

244
00:28:19.320 --> 00:28:25.920
people, and the people they drop bombs on, and this is notable, are always more primitive

245
00:28:25.920 --> 00:28:32.520
and unfortunate than themselves. They're always smaller in stature, they always have, or usually

246
00:28:32.520 --> 00:28:40.040
have darker skins. That is what the current culture of war seems to amount to, and I think

247
00:28:40.040 --> 00:28:47.040
I think we should abhor it. Thank you.
