WEBVTT

NOTE Bernanke

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.500
It's a pleasure to be here today and I want to thank all the members of the Mises Institute for supporting great events like this.

2
00:00:06.500 --> 00:00:10.000
You are ultimately the people who make it happen.

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:17.000
And when I was first asked to speak at this particular conference, I thought for about one second, I said, Bernanke.

4
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:19.000
I want to speak about Bernanke.

5
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:24.000
He's the only one who's been in this mess from the very beginning.

6
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:28.000
He's one of the persons that helped create the housing bubble.

7
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:33.000
He's the one that helped lure investors into investing in toxic assets.

8
00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:36.000
He's the one that denied there was a housing bubble.

9
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:39.000
He's the one that tried to cover up the economic crisis.

10
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:45.000
And now he's helping the government paper over its massive deficits

11
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:51.000
and helping to wreck the rest of what's left of the U.S. economy.

12
00:00:51.000 --> 00:00:56.000
A few years ago I wrote an article for lewrockwell.com

13
00:00:56.000 --> 00:01:03.820
dot com entitled Green Spam. In that article I described the testimony of Alan Greenspan,

14
00:01:03.820 --> 00:01:09.680
the chairman of the Federal Reserve, as dangerous to listen to. I urged readers to delete his

15
00:01:09.680 --> 00:01:19.320
words from their minds just like they delete spam email messages. Things have become much

16
00:01:19.320 --> 00:01:23.320
and much worse under Ben Bernanke as chairman.

17
00:01:23.320 --> 00:01:28.320
Ben Bernanke's testimony is of course misleading, convoluted and inconsistent,

18
00:01:28.320 --> 00:01:34.320
and he's also made statements and predictions that are blatantly untrue,

19
00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:38.320
incorrect, not to mention very dangerous.

20
00:01:38.320 --> 00:01:42.320
First, a few words about this guy, Bernanke.

21
00:01:42.320 --> 00:01:48.320
Bernanke went to Harvard University and got an undergraduate degree in economics at Harvard University.

22
00:01:48.320 --> 00:01:56.820
He then went to graduate school at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, where he received his Ph.D. in economics.

23
00:01:56.820 --> 00:02:07.320
His thesis advisor was Stanley Fisher, and his committee consisted of Fisher, Dornbusch, and Robert Solow, a Nobel Prize winner.

24
00:02:07.320 --> 00:02:13.320
So it's safe to say that he had an elite education in mainstream economics.

25
00:02:13.320 --> 00:02:19.320
Bernanke went on to teach at Stanford University, New York University and Princeton University

26
00:02:19.320 --> 00:02:25.920
where he served as chairman of the economics department from 1996 to 2002.

27
00:02:25.920 --> 00:02:29.680
And the economics department at Princeton during this time was the equivalent of the

28
00:02:29.680 --> 00:02:34.200
New York Yankees in baseball, a lot of big hitters.

29
00:02:34.200 --> 00:02:37.440
Bernanke has authored several key major textbooks.

30
00:02:37.440 --> 00:02:43.300
He was the National Bureau of Economic Research's director of monetary economics and he was

31
00:02:43.300 --> 00:02:46.580
was an editor of the American Economic Review.

32
00:02:46.580 --> 00:02:50.200
He is currently ranked 23rd in terms

33
00:02:50.200 --> 00:02:53.980
of being an academic economics publisher,

34
00:02:53.980 --> 00:02:57.960
despite being out of academia for almost a decade.

35
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:01.020
Bernanke was appointed as a member of the Federal Reserve

36
00:03:01.020 --> 00:03:03.780
Board of Governors in 2002.

37
00:03:03.780 --> 00:03:05.980
He was then appointed by President Bush

38
00:03:05.980 --> 00:03:07.820
to be chairman of the President's Council

39
00:03:07.820 --> 00:03:09.580
of Economic Advisors.

40
00:03:09.580 --> 00:03:13.100
Then Bush appointed him to be chairman

41
00:03:13.100 --> 00:03:15.080
of the Fed in 2005.

42
00:03:15.080 --> 00:03:19.040
Of course, he was re-nominated by President Obama in 2009.

43
00:03:19.040 --> 00:03:25.640
And in 2009, Time Magazine named Bernanke its Person of the Year.

44
00:03:25.640 --> 00:03:30.140
Not a bad run-up in fame and influence for a little boy

45
00:03:30.140 --> 00:03:33.600
from rural South Carolina.

46
00:03:33.600 --> 00:03:36.640
Just to be clear, Bernanke received a top-notch education

47
00:03:36.640 --> 00:03:40.320
in mainstream economics at Harvard and MIT

48
00:03:40.320 --> 00:03:44.800
under the direction of the leading economist in academia.

49
00:03:44.800 --> 00:03:46.680
He has taught at premier institutions

50
00:03:46.680 --> 00:03:51.560
and held key leadership roles within the profession.

51
00:03:51.560 --> 00:03:55.080
He is considered one of the most important researchers

52
00:03:55.080 --> 00:03:57.820
and publishers of his generation and is

53
00:03:57.820 --> 00:04:01.680
best known for his research on the Great Depression, where

54
00:04:01.680 --> 00:04:03.520
he added an important distinction

55
00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:07.720
to the contributions of Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz.

56
00:04:07.720 --> 00:04:13.320
For Bernanke, the Great Depression was less about the Federal Reserve reducing the money

57
00:04:13.320 --> 00:04:19.760
supply, which is the Friedman and Schwartz hypothesis, and more about bank failures that

58
00:04:19.760 --> 00:04:25.040
increase the cost of credit and decreases its availability.

59
00:04:25.040 --> 00:04:31.200
For Bernanke, a downturn can lead to bank failures which curtail the availability of

60
00:04:31.200 --> 00:04:41.200
and this reduces economic activity further so that the economy spirals into a vicious cycle ending in economic depression.

61
00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:53.200
I want to come back to that, his hypothesis, a little later because it's critical in getting an overall understanding of Bernanke and what's going on and why he does what he does.

62
00:04:53.200 --> 00:04:57.200
So now on to his record over the last 10 years or so.

63
00:04:57.200 --> 00:05:04.200
As I mentioned, Bernanke served as a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve from 2002 to 2005.

64
00:05:04.200 --> 00:05:12.200
In one of his very first speeches as a governor, it was entitled, Deflation, Making Sure It Doesn't Happen Here.

65
00:05:12.200 --> 00:05:18.200
This is where he outlined what he is now referred to as the Bernanke Doctrine.

66
00:05:18.200 --> 00:05:26.200
This doctrine holds that deflation or a general decline in prices is a highly destructive phenomenon.

67
00:05:26.200 --> 00:05:30.680
even if it's one that is unlikely to occur in the United States.

68
00:05:30.680 --> 00:05:34.080
However, if deflation were to occur,

69
00:05:34.080 --> 00:05:38.180
the Federal Reserve, according to the Bernanke Doctrine, must resort to the

70
00:05:38.180 --> 00:05:39.280
printing press

71
00:05:39.280 --> 00:05:42.800
and several unconventional policy procedures

72
00:05:42.800 --> 00:05:46.840
if reducing interest rates alone fails to reverse

73
00:05:46.840 --> 00:05:49.880
the deflation. This would involve

74
00:05:49.880 --> 00:05:54.280
the following, increasing the money supply at a rapid rate,

75
00:05:54.280 --> 00:06:05.280
Ensuring liquidity to all financial markets, lowering the interest rate to zero, controlling rates on private bonds and securities,

76
00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:15.280
devaluing the dollar, lowering the exchange rate of the dollar, assisting the Treasury to buy equity stakes in private companies,

77
00:06:15.280 --> 00:06:23.280
and in his theory, it actually says, buy every share of every company in the country.

78
00:06:23.280 --> 00:06:28.280
Of course he says, but it's probably unnecessary to go that far.

79
00:06:28.280 --> 00:06:37.280
Amazing. He would do basically anything that's necessary to prevent the failure of major financial firms.

80
00:06:37.280 --> 00:06:46.280
At the time, in 2002, it all seemed too far-fetched, but not anymore.

81
00:06:46.280 --> 00:06:49.280
According to Bernanke in 2002, quote,

82
00:06:49.280 --> 00:07:04.280
The sources of deflation are not a mystery. Deflation is almost all cases a side effect of a collapse in aggregate demand, a drop in spending so severe that producers must cut prices on an ongoing basis in order to find buyers.

83
00:07:04.280 --> 00:07:17.280
Likewise, the economic effects of a deflationary episode, for the most part, are similar to those of any other sharp decline in aggregate spending, namely recession, rising unemployment and financial stress.

84
00:07:17.280 --> 00:07:26.440
Now, the blunders in this one paragraph almost make me want to pull the hair out of my head.

85
00:07:26.440 --> 00:07:33.480
For example, if all we know is that a collapse in aggregate demand is a source of deflation,

86
00:07:33.480 --> 00:07:39.720
then its cause is a mystery, not a lack of mystery, because aggregate demand does not

87
00:07:39.720 --> 00:07:46.200
illuminate the sectors in the economy that are causing the problem.

88
00:07:46.200 --> 00:07:52.160
And only in a footnote does Bernanke suggest that an increase in aggregate supply, which

89
00:07:52.160 --> 00:08:01.080
of course is generally a good thing, so only in a footnote does he suggest that is a possibility

90
00:08:01.080 --> 00:08:04.520
that would lead to deflation.

91
00:08:04.520 --> 00:08:11.840
For the most part, Bernanke thinks that deflation is the cause of all of our economic troubles.

92
00:08:11.840 --> 00:08:16.760
The problem with Bernanke is that he's working with mainstream economic theory and ignoring

93
00:08:16.760 --> 00:08:18.240
history.

94
00:08:18.240 --> 00:08:23.000
He thinks deflation is bad, it's unlikely to happen, but if it does happen, he will

95
00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:29.840
use weapons of mass economic destruction to prevent it from happening further.

96
00:08:29.840 --> 00:08:35.880
Now in reality, deflation of prices is a normal aspect of the market economy.

97
00:08:35.880 --> 00:08:41.720
It's simply the production of goods is outstripping the production of money resulting

98
00:08:41.720 --> 00:08:46.200
in Lower Prices and Higher Real Wages.

99
00:08:46.200 --> 00:08:51.900
Historically then, deflation has been a common feature of the American economy, particularly

100
00:08:51.900 --> 00:08:54.460
before the Federal Reserve.

101
00:08:54.460 --> 00:09:00.880
And the one time there was a significant deflation of prices and an economic decline was the

102
00:09:00.880 --> 00:09:02.360
Great Depression.

103
00:09:02.360 --> 00:09:05.340
And that's basically the only time that happened.

104
00:09:05.340 --> 00:09:11.640
So apparently Bernanke's study of economic history was restricted to that one period.

105
00:09:11.640 --> 00:09:17.180
Because two economists have published a study in the American Economic Review in 2004 that

106
00:09:17.180 --> 00:09:21.540
examined the association of deflation and depression.

107
00:09:21.540 --> 00:09:27.180
They looked at 17 major countries, well over a hundred years of data, and concluded that

108
00:09:27.180 --> 00:09:33.960
quote, beyond the Great Depression, the notion of deflation and depression are linked, virtually

109
00:09:33.960 --> 00:09:35.880
disappears.

110
00:09:35.880 --> 00:09:42.080
Michael Bordeaux's work, which he writes for the National Bureau of Economic Research,

111
00:09:42.080 --> 00:09:49.340
also suggests that there is no clear linkage between, or necessary linkage between, deflation

112
00:09:49.340 --> 00:09:50.340
and depression.

113
00:09:50.340 --> 00:09:56.880
Okay, then we go down to 2004 and the Great Moderation Debate.

114
00:09:56.880 --> 00:10:02.380
In 2004, during the housing bubble, Bernanke addressed the phenomenon referred to as the

115
00:10:02.380 --> 00:10:04.360
Great Moderation.

116
00:10:04.360 --> 00:10:11.240
This is refers to the decrease in volatility in inflation and the decreased volatility

117
00:10:11.240 --> 00:10:18.160
in economic growth, and that basically had occurred over the previous two decades.

118
00:10:18.160 --> 00:10:23.320
Bernanke found that it was improvements in monetary policy that had not been given their

119
00:10:23.320 --> 00:10:28.160
full credit in terms of creating this great moderation.

120
00:10:28.160 --> 00:10:51.160
Quote Bernanke, the great moderation, a substantial decline in macroeconomic volatility over the past 20 years is a striking economic development, whether the dominant cause of the great moderation is structural change, improved monetary policy or simply good luck is an important question about which no consensus has yet emerged.

121
00:10:51.160 --> 00:10:57.660
I have argued here today that improved monetary policy was likely made an important contribution

122
00:10:57.660 --> 00:11:02.380
not only to the reduction of the volatility of inflation, but also to the reduction of

123
00:11:02.380 --> 00:11:06.220
the volatility of output as well.

124
00:11:06.220 --> 00:11:11.840
This conclusion on my part makes me optimistic for the future because I am confident that

125
00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:17.020
monetary policy makers will not forget the lessons of the 1970s.

126
00:11:17.020 --> 00:11:19.740
You want to bet?

127
00:11:19.740 --> 00:11:24.420
I have put my case, this is Bernanke, I have put my case for better monetary policy rather

128
00:11:24.420 --> 00:11:29.180
forcefully today because I think it is likely that the policy explanation for the Great

129
00:11:29.180 --> 00:11:33.980
Moderation deserves more credit than it has received in literature.

130
00:11:33.980 --> 00:11:39.700
So he's basically saying, you know, the economy's, the inflation's come down, it's less volatile,

131
00:11:39.700 --> 00:11:45.340
the economy has smoothed out over the last two decades, and I'm here today to claim credit

132
00:11:45.340 --> 00:11:50.940
for Monetary Policy Reducing All That Thing, All Those Issues.

133
00:11:50.940 --> 00:11:55.340
So obviously, changes in monetary policy can bring about reductions

134
00:11:55.340 --> 00:11:56.780
in volatility in the economy.

135
00:11:56.780 --> 00:11:58.400
There's no doubt about that.

136
00:11:58.400 --> 00:12:05.600
However, if the changes brought about this less volatility from 1984 to 2004,

137
00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:11.040
then what about the increased volatility since 2006, Mr. Bernanke?

138
00:12:11.040 --> 00:12:16.480
That's when you took over as chairman of the Federal Reserve until today.

139
00:12:16.480 --> 00:12:20.840
Was it the previous policy still in place when you came into office that caused the

140
00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:22.840
increased volatility?

141
00:12:22.840 --> 00:12:28.280
Or was it changes in monetary policy that you helped bring about that has caused the

142
00:12:28.280 --> 00:12:31.640
increased volatility since 2006?

143
00:12:31.640 --> 00:12:32.640
Which one is it?

144
00:12:32.640 --> 00:12:36.720
It's got to be one or the other.

145
00:12:36.720 --> 00:12:42.120
Probably the worst of Bernanke's statement occurred in 2006, and this is near the zenith

146
00:12:42.120 --> 00:12:47.880
of the housing bubble, remember, and it's a time when all the exotic mortgage products

147
00:12:47.880 --> 00:12:52.020
and manipulations were in their so-called prime.

148
00:12:52.020 --> 00:12:59.600
This was an era of the subprime mortgage, the interest-only mortgage, the no documentation

149
00:12:59.600 --> 00:13:03.840
loans and the heyday of mortgage-backed securities.

150
00:13:03.840 --> 00:13:12.660
So this is the pinnacle of all these garbage paper toxic assets.

151
00:13:12.660 --> 00:13:17.960
At the time, the new Fed Chairman admitted the possibility of slower growth in housing

152
00:13:17.960 --> 00:13:23.440
prices, but confidently declared that if this did happen, he'd just lower interest rates.

153
00:13:23.440 --> 00:13:29.560
Bernanke stated in 2006 that he believed that the mortgage market was now more stable than

154
00:13:29.560 --> 00:13:30.940
in the past.

155
00:13:30.940 --> 00:13:36.900
He noted in particular that quote, our examiners tell us that lending standards are generally

156
00:13:36.900 --> 00:13:43.060
sound and are not comparable to the standards that contributed to the broad problems in

157
00:13:43.060 --> 00:13:45.940
the banking industry two decades ago.

158
00:13:45.940 --> 00:13:53.140
In particular, real estate appraisals practices have improved.

159
00:13:53.140 --> 00:13:55.260
I mean that's just literally unbelievable.

160
00:13:55.260 --> 00:14:00.900
It's as if he's hiding in a closet and closing his eyes and covering up his ears so he

161
00:14:00.900 --> 00:14:11.580
Bernanke, the former economics professor from Princeton, gave an address to the American

162
00:14:11.580 --> 00:14:16.100
Economic Association in January of 2007.

163
00:14:16.100 --> 00:14:23.580
He's the first chairman of the Fed from academia since Arthur Burns in the 1970s.

164
00:14:23.580 --> 00:14:27.860
It was Burns who helped take us off the gold standard, and God only knows what Bernanke

165
00:14:27.860 --> 00:14:30.240
is going to take us.

166
00:14:30.240 --> 00:14:34.800
In addressing his fellow academic economist, Bernanke was unusually bold in describing

167
00:14:34.800 --> 00:14:40.080
the Fed's access and ability to use information and data concerning financial markets.

168
00:14:40.080 --> 00:14:46.720
This knowledge and expertise includes the market for derivatives and securitized assets.

169
00:14:46.720 --> 00:14:51.740
He described the Fed as a type of superhero for financial markets.

170
00:14:51.740 --> 00:14:56.460
In discussing the Fed's role as chief regulator of financial markets, he made very powerful

171
00:14:56.460 --> 00:15:04.660
Claims Concerning the Fed's Ability to Identify Risks to Anticipate Financial Crisis and Effectively

172
00:15:04.660 --> 00:15:10.580
Respond to Any Financial Challenge.

173
00:15:10.580 --> 00:15:15.140
Quoting Bernanke, many large banking organizations are sophisticated participants in financial

174
00:15:15.140 --> 00:15:19.540
markets, including the markets for derivatives and securitized assets.

175
00:15:19.540 --> 00:15:24.940
In monitoring and analyzing the activities of these banks, the Fed obtains valuable information

176
00:15:24.940 --> 00:15:29.620
about Trends in Current Developments in the Markets. Together with the knowledge obtained

177
00:15:29.620 --> 00:15:35.060
through its monetary policy and payment activities, information gained through its supervisory

178
00:15:35.060 --> 00:15:41.860
activities gives the Fed an exceptionally broad and deep understanding of developments

179
00:15:41.860 --> 00:15:47.540
in financial markets and financial institutions. This is just months before everything unwinds

180
00:15:47.540 --> 00:15:53.480
in the economy. In its capacity as a bank supervisor, the Fed can obtain detailed information

181
00:15:53.480 --> 00:15:59.920
from these institutions about their operations and risk management practices, and can take

182
00:15:59.920 --> 00:16:03.900
action as needed to address risks and deficiencies.

183
00:16:03.900 --> 00:16:09.640
The Fed is also either a direct or umbrella supervisor of several large commercial banks

184
00:16:09.640 --> 00:16:16.320
that are critical to the payment system through their clearing and settlement activities.

185
00:16:16.320 --> 00:16:24.400
In other words, the Fed knows everything there is to know about financial markets.

186
00:16:24.400 --> 00:16:26.440
It gets worse.

187
00:16:26.440 --> 00:16:27.960
Hard to imagine, yes.

188
00:16:27.960 --> 00:16:35.520
In my view, Bernanke, in my view, however, the greatest external benefit of the Fed's

189
00:16:35.520 --> 00:16:44.280
supervisory activities are those related to the institution's role in preventing and managing

190
00:16:44.280 --> 00:16:48.020
Financial Crisis.

191
00:16:48.020 --> 00:16:56.540
In other words, the Fed can prevent most crisis and manage the ones that do occur.

192
00:16:56.540 --> 00:16:58.680
Again, quoting Bernanke,

193
00:16:58.680 --> 00:17:03.200
finally, the wide scope of the Fed's activities in financial markets, including

194
00:17:03.200 --> 00:17:06.600
not only bank supervision and its roles in the payment system,

195
00:17:06.600 --> 00:17:10.800
but also the interaction with primary dealers and the monitoring of capital

196
00:17:10.800 --> 00:17:12.340
markets associated

197
00:17:12.340 --> 00:17:19.340
with the Making of Monetary Policy has given the Fed a uniquely broad experience in evaluating

198
00:17:19.840 --> 00:17:26.300
and responding to emerging financial strains. In other words, the Fed is an experienced

199
00:17:26.300 --> 00:17:33.180
forward-looking preventer of financial crisis. This is an incredible claim given Bernanke's

200
00:17:33.180 --> 00:17:38.020
the way things have obviously turned out and his own abysmal record of forecasting any

201
00:17:38.020 --> 00:17:54.020
Now, in addition to this, of course, Chairman Bernanke is famous on the Internet because of a YouTube video that chronicles his rosy views of the economy from, say, 2005 to 2007.

202
00:17:54.020 --> 00:18:04.020
He denied there was a housing bubble in 2005. He denied that housing prices could decrease substantially in 2005.

203
00:18:04.020 --> 00:18:10.480
2005, and he said that housing bubble would not affect the real economy and employment

204
00:18:10.480 --> 00:18:16.020
in 2006, and he tried to calm fears about the subprime mortgage market.

205
00:18:16.020 --> 00:18:22.020
He stated that he expected reasonable growth and strength in the economy in 2007, and that

206
00:18:22.020 --> 00:18:27.620
the problem in the subprime market, which had then started to become apparent, would

207
00:18:27.620 --> 00:18:35.380
would not impact the overall mortgage market or the economy in general.

208
00:18:35.380 --> 00:18:39.780
In mid-2007, he declared the global economy strong and predicted a quick return to normal

209
00:18:39.780 --> 00:18:42.200
growth in the United States.

210
00:18:42.200 --> 00:18:49.540
And how many times exactly have we heard about those green shoots coming up over the last

211
00:18:49.540 --> 00:18:53.020
two years?

212
00:18:53.020 --> 00:19:00.460
at a time when as many as 40% of all American families have experienced unemployment, bankruptcy,

213
00:19:00.460 --> 00:19:05.700
foreclosure or are currently in jeopardy of losing their homes.

214
00:19:05.700 --> 00:19:12.100
Now remember that the Austrians were writing about this housing bubble, its cause and some

215
00:19:12.100 --> 00:19:17.140
of the probable outcomes as early as 2003.

216
00:19:17.140 --> 00:19:21.780
Bernanke and others have denied that you can predict bubbles and when prodded about the

217
00:19:21.780 --> 00:19:26.180
and Predictions of the Austrians and the Austrian Economist,

218
00:19:26.180 --> 00:19:30.940
the familiar retort is the broken clock effect.

219
00:19:30.940 --> 00:19:36.980
That is, even a broken clock will get it right twice a day.

220
00:19:36.980 --> 00:19:39.580
But not so fast.

221
00:19:39.580 --> 00:19:42.140
I collected a list of over 40 people

222
00:19:42.140 --> 00:19:44.980
who made reasonably correct predictions

223
00:19:44.980 --> 00:19:46.940
about the housing bubble.

224
00:19:46.940 --> 00:19:49.780
And about almost 3 quarters of them

225
00:19:49.780 --> 00:19:55.260
were followers of the Austrian School, and given that the Austrian School of economists

226
00:19:55.260 --> 00:20:00.980
makes up a very teeny percentage of all economists in the world, it would seem that there's

227
00:20:00.980 --> 00:20:08.660
much more here than a broken clock.

228
00:20:08.660 --> 00:20:14.920
So Bernanke has the credentials of an elite mainstream economist of the highest rank,

229
00:20:14.920 --> 00:20:19.100
as well as the highest titles for economists working in government.

230
00:20:19.100 --> 00:20:24.980
Bernanke's defining contribution in economics is this distinction he drew with regard to

231
00:20:24.980 --> 00:20:29.940
the Friedman and Schwartz analysis of the Great Depression.

232
00:20:29.940 --> 00:20:34.300
Where Friedman and Schwartz found that the economy went into a great depression because

233
00:20:34.300 --> 00:20:45.020
of a reduction in the money supply, Bernanke finds that a collapse in the banking industry

234
00:20:45.020 --> 00:20:51.500
resulted in restricted credit that came at a higher price and that caused the depression

235
00:20:51.500 --> 00:20:53.140
to be great.

236
00:20:53.140 --> 00:20:58.260
Both of them agree there was a decline in aggregate demand that could have been averted

237
00:20:58.260 --> 00:21:01.980
by prompt action by the Federal Reserve and the government.

238
00:21:01.980 --> 00:21:06.780
However, the type of action required is different and this is important.

239
00:21:06.780 --> 00:21:10.740
Friedman and Schwartz argued that the Federal Reserve should have acted to increase the

240
00:21:10.740 --> 00:21:14.800
money supply or at least to prevent it from falling.

241
00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:18.960
In contrast, Bernanke believed that the Federal Reserve should have prevented the collapse

242
00:21:18.960 --> 00:21:20.600
of banks.

243
00:21:20.600 --> 00:21:26.580
The Friedman and Schwartz solution would have allowed banks to fail, although presumably

244
00:21:26.580 --> 00:21:31.940
fewer than did fail due to the increases in the money supply and liquidity.

245
00:21:31.940 --> 00:21:37.400
Bernanke, in contrast, would have acted to bail out most banks from failing in order

246
00:21:37.400 --> 00:21:41.960
to maintain the availability of credit in the economy.

247
00:21:41.960 --> 00:21:46.200
and he would have been less concerned with the overall money supply.

248
00:21:46.200 --> 00:21:51.140
Whether either of these policies would have worked is dubious because as Murray Rothbard

249
00:21:51.140 --> 00:21:56.360
wrote, other interventionist policies by the Hoover administration were preventing the

250
00:21:56.360 --> 00:22:03.360
economy from correcting itself, a view that is gaining some adherence today within mainstream

251
00:22:03.400 --> 00:22:09.400
economics. The relevant issue for today is that Bernanke essentially believes that it

252
00:22:09.400 --> 00:22:16.960
is the Federal Reserve's job to bailout financial institutions in order to maintain the channels

253
00:22:16.960 --> 00:22:24.500
of credit and prevent other non-monetary factors from negatively impacting aggregate demand.

254
00:22:24.500 --> 00:22:31.080
This explains Bernanke's bold support and swift action to bailout financial firms like

255
00:22:31.080 --> 00:22:37.400
Bear Stearns and AIG, the nationalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, backstopping

256
00:22:37.400 --> 00:22:43.840
and home markets such as the money market, mutual funds, and absorbing vast quantities

257
00:22:43.840 --> 00:22:48.920
of toxic assets onto the Federal Reserve's balance sheet.

258
00:22:48.920 --> 00:22:54.940
In preparing for this lecture, I began to realize just how an obvious choice Ben Bernanke

259
00:22:54.940 --> 00:22:58.460
was for chairman of the Fed.

260
00:22:58.460 --> 00:23:06.340
From the point of view of banks, corporations, Wall Street, which is also known as the corporatocracy

261
00:23:06.340 --> 00:23:14.300
or government run for the point of view and interest of large corporations.

262
00:23:14.300 --> 00:23:19.200
Who would be a better choice than somebody who literally wrote the book on bailing out

263
00:23:19.200 --> 00:23:22.780
banks and Wall Street during a financial crisis?

264
00:23:22.780 --> 00:23:31.660
You couldn't really find anybody better suited to defend your interest than Mr. Ben Bernanke.

265
00:23:31.660 --> 00:23:36.180
Another example of all this is driving down the value of the dollar.

266
00:23:36.180 --> 00:23:41.060
This means higher prices for you and me, but hey, it's great for exports, is what they'll

267
00:23:41.060 --> 00:23:47.220
tell you on CNBC, you know, well, you know, it's going to lead to maybe some higher prices

268
00:23:47.220 --> 00:23:53.820
for the vast majority of people, but it's great for exports, which again is largely

269
00:23:53.820 --> 00:23:57.580
the corporatocracy, the large corporations.

270
00:23:57.580 --> 00:24:02.940
When you realize that the Fed is the major engine which enriches the corporatocracy at

271
00:24:02.940 --> 00:24:18.940
Another example is interest rates. Banks benefit, corporations benefit, but how about Main Street, small business and savers? Lowering the interest rate from here especially only hurts savers, retirees and even small town banks who cannot access all this cheap money from the Fed.

272
00:24:18.940 --> 00:24:29.940
Lowering the interest rate from here, especially, only hurts savers, retirees, and even small-town banks who cannot access all this cheap money from the Fed.

273
00:24:29.940 --> 00:24:40.940
Of course, this is a constant theme on CNBC and Bloomberg, is where do retirees and institutions and pensions go to get yield?

274
00:24:40.940 --> 00:24:46.940
Well, there's no yield out there because Bernanke has suppressed the interest rate as far as it can possibly go.

275
00:24:46.940 --> 00:25:01.940
So this exploitation effect that Bernanke is helping to bring about, where the corporatocracy benefits a great deal, is protected from many of their own failures and mistakes, while everybody else in the country suffers,

276
00:25:01.940 --> 00:25:20.940
Even the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas noted this week that it would seem that the Fed is only helping the corporatocracy move overseas before the whole U.S. economy crashes and burns.

277
00:25:20.940 --> 00:25:27.940
Quoting Richard Fisher, the president of the Dallas Fed,

278
00:25:27.940 --> 00:25:38.940
In my darkest moments, I have begun to wonder if the monetary accommodation we have already engineered might even be working in the wrong places.

279
00:25:38.940 --> 00:25:51.940
Far too many of the large corporations I survey that are committing to fixed investment report that the most effective way to deploy cheap money raised in the current bond markets

280
00:25:51.940 --> 00:26:06.940
or in the form of loans from banks beyond buying stock and expanding dividends is to invest it abroad where taxes are lower and governments are more eager to please.

281
00:26:06.940 --> 00:26:16.940
So we're entering the fourth year of this economic crisis. We should not be surprised to see additional moves on the part of Ben Bernanke.

282
00:26:16.940 --> 00:26:34.940
After all, he admired FDR, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, for his bold and innovative policy-making and he has replicated FDR's approach at the Fed, even down to the use of those acronyms, TARP and TELF and all that stuff.

283
00:26:34.940 --> 00:26:42.940
So don't be surprised if we see a lot more quantitative easing with each successful downturn in the economy.

284
00:26:42.940 --> 00:26:50.940
I'd like to end today with a quote from Murray Rothbard from many years ago.

285
00:26:50.940 --> 00:26:59.940
Quote, as we face the future, the prognosis for the dollar and for the international monetary system is grim indeed.

286
00:26:59.940 --> 00:27:05.940
Until and unless we can return to the classical gold standard at a realistic gold price,

287
00:27:05.940 --> 00:27:19.940
The international monetary system is fated to shift back and forth between fixed and fluctuating exchange rates with each system posing unsolved problems, working badly and finally disintegrating.

288
00:27:19.940 --> 00:27:30.940
And fueling this disintegration will be the continued inflation of the supply of dollars and hence of American prices, which show no sign of abating.

289
00:27:30.940 --> 00:27:36.380
The prospect for the future is accelerating and eventually runaway inflation at home accompanied

290
00:27:36.380 --> 00:27:40.980
by monetary breakdown and economic warfare abroad.

291
00:27:40.980 --> 00:27:46.240
This prognosis can only be changed by a drastic alteration of the American and world monetary

292
00:27:46.240 --> 00:27:53.480
system by the return to a free market commodity money such as gold and by removing government

293
00:27:53.480 --> 00:27:55.580
totally from the monetary scene.

294
00:27:55.580 --> 00:27:56.580
Thank you very much.

295
00:27:56.580 --> 00:27:58.580
Thank you very much.
