WEBVTT

NOTE Government's Response to the Crisis: A Fantastic Success, for Government

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.760
When you start one of these programs, it always seems as if you got a lot of things ahead

2
00:00:03.760 --> 00:00:08.800
of you. And then when you get to the end, it seems, whoa, we're already at the end,

3
00:00:08.800 --> 00:00:16.800
what happened? And so I've really enjoyed listening to the other speakers, as I always

4
00:00:16.800 --> 00:00:23.880
do when I come to the Mises Institute. I've never failed to have a good time coming to

5
00:00:23.880 --> 00:00:29.880
visit here. I love the people who operate the Mises Institute, the people who are associating

6
00:00:29.880 --> 00:00:36.880
The people who are interested in it and of course the people whose support make it all possible.

7
00:00:36.880 --> 00:00:44.880
So let me add my gratitude to the thanks you've received from other speakers before me.

8
00:00:44.880 --> 00:00:52.880
I think you're helping to sustain some wonderful work and some work that has already been much more successful

9
00:00:52.880 --> 00:01:22.880
Murray Rothbard died unexpectedly. He really was, while he was alive, the hardened soul of this operation and every program that we had here with Murray. Murray was the star, and I still miss him very much, and I know that he was a very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very,

10
00:01:22.880 --> 00:01:52.880
and many others do too, but the beautiful thing is that the Mises Institute kept going without Murray and has given a wonderful account of itself since his death, which, again, time flies, it's been 15 years now, but a lot of great work has been done and I think even greater work lies ahead with your support, so please, if you can, support the Mises Institute, continue to do so,

11
00:01:52.880 --> 00:01:57.880
I certainly will appreciate it, and I know Lew will, as will the others.

12
00:01:57.880 --> 00:02:05.880
By the time we get to the end, your backsides are probably getting pretty well-worn.

13
00:02:05.880 --> 00:02:15.880
So maybe it's a relief that we are at the last session here, but I feel a little bit wronged by this.

14
00:02:15.880 --> 00:02:21.880
It's the first time I've ever complained about anything in my dealings with the Mises Institute.

15
00:02:21.880 --> 00:02:51.880
but somehow to put me at the tail end of the program seems unfair because one it means that you've already got an opportunity to listen to some wonderful public speakers and public speaking is really hardly my strong suit but the other thing is that since we don't really coordinate these talks by the time you come to me you've already heard everything I wanted to tell you so maybe the good news

16
00:02:51.880 --> 00:02:58.240
The good news is I won't need but five or ten minutes here and then we can all adjourn.

17
00:02:58.240 --> 00:03:01.480
But at all events I wanted to talk about the current crisis.

18
00:03:01.480 --> 00:03:09.840
I started writing about this just as it was unfolding and began to write about monetary

19
00:03:09.840 --> 00:03:15.800
policy and credit policy and government fiscal policy and all the rest of the actions the

20
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:45.800
government was taking from the certainly from the middle of 2008 on in retrospect we can see that that important aspects of the crisis were already underway by that time but that's when it really captured my attention and so I've I started writing about it because I kept waiting for the experts to call attention to certain things that I noticed and I couldn't see that they were you know

21
00:03:45.800 --> 00:03:51.160
I mean, where are all the people who really know about monetary policy and fiscal policy

22
00:03:51.160 --> 00:03:55.320
and all these extraordinary actions the government was undertaking?

23
00:03:55.320 --> 00:04:02.760
Why aren't they commenting, you know, where are these kingpins of the economics establishment?

24
00:04:02.760 --> 00:04:09.800
I'm just a humble economic historian, academically speaking, and it's been a long time since

25
00:04:09.800 --> 00:04:15.360
I've even been an academic, so I certainly wasn't a highly qualified person, but anyhow

26
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:23.600
Now I jumped in there because I saw a kind of vacuum and since that time I've just been

27
00:04:23.600 --> 00:04:31.960
churning out one commentary after another and if you go to Lew Rockwell's archives

28
00:04:31.960 --> 00:04:39.040
or Mises.org's archives or the Independent Institute's page where they list things that

29
00:04:39.040 --> 00:04:46.840
I've written in the past few years, you'll find a whole bunch of these things. I don't

30
00:04:46.840 --> 00:04:54.200
know if these trees add up to a forest, but at all events, it seems to me that the mainstream

31
00:04:54.200 --> 00:05:02.000
economics profession in particular was almost struck dumb by the events of the past three

32
00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:05.640
years. It's as if the reason they weren't saying anything is that they didn't understand

33
00:05:05.640 --> 00:05:13.600
And what was going on? It was sort of a shock to them, I think, in many ways. When they

34
00:05:13.600 --> 00:05:18.800
began to absorb what was actually happening, they couldn't understand why it would be

35
00:05:18.800 --> 00:05:25.480
happening. It didn't look like the result of any of the models they would normally use

36
00:05:25.480 --> 00:05:32.760
to analyze macroeconomics, for example. So why were these things happening? So they were

37
00:05:32.760 --> 00:05:39.320
somewhat mute and eventually they did come around but the strange thing then was that

38
00:05:39.320 --> 00:05:46.360
when they came around that they came around to reverting to a very infantile form of Keynesianism.

39
00:05:46.360 --> 00:05:54.640
After decades in which the mainstream macroeconomics profession had thoroughly transcended that

40
00:05:54.640 --> 00:06:01.720
old-fashioned type Keynesianism that started appearing in the late 1940s in Paul Samuelson's

41
00:06:01.720 --> 00:06:11.720
and the Meat and Bread of Introductory Economics in American Universities

42
00:06:31.720 --> 00:06:36.040
That's one hypothesis at least.

43
00:06:36.040 --> 00:06:42.080
Well at all events, I've written a lot and I want to tell you about something I wrote

44
00:06:42.080 --> 00:06:47.480
because most of these pieces have been fairly short and fugitive and focused on events of

45
00:06:47.480 --> 00:06:53.840
the day, but I did write an article that was published in the spring this year in something

46
00:06:53.840 --> 00:07:00.680
called the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy and it's available online, so if you

47
00:07:00.680 --> 00:07:06.280
To get the spring issue of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, you can read my

48
00:07:06.280 --> 00:07:15.120
organized thoughts about the current economic crisis, what brought it about, and how the

49
00:07:15.120 --> 00:07:21.960
government reacted and what the consequences of those reactions are likely to be.

50
00:07:21.960 --> 00:07:29.000
We're still in the midst of this crisis, so it's much too early to do an autopsy of this

51
00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:32.760
Corp.

52
00:07:32.760 --> 00:07:41.700
But nonetheless, I do refer you to that article for something more than an op-ed style commentary

53
00:07:41.700 --> 00:07:42.700
from me.

54
00:07:42.700 --> 00:07:49.320
Now, for today's talk, I thought I would kind of approach the subject of the current

55
00:07:49.320 --> 00:07:52.680
crisis perhaps a little differently from some of the other speakers.

56
00:07:52.680 --> 00:07:58.000
And I've been sitting here in fear for the last two days as they started to get right

57
00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:06.440
Right up to my point, and some of them have certainly verged on it, but not quite developed

58
00:08:06.440 --> 00:08:10.120
this in the way I want to right now.

59
00:08:10.120 --> 00:08:13.960
That is, we've looked at a lot of government policies, and certainly for those of us who

60
00:08:13.960 --> 00:08:18.680
know something about Austrian economics, these look like dumb policies.

61
00:08:18.680 --> 00:08:24.960
They look like stupid, counterproductive policies that not only did not repair the crisis, but

62
00:08:24.960 --> 00:08:29.120
that actually made it worse.

63
00:08:29.120 --> 00:08:36.320
So in a sense, we can describe what the government has done and we can say, well, clearly these

64
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:37.840
are failed policies.

65
00:08:37.840 --> 00:08:45.820
Here we are, we're almost three years since the official NBER beginning of the recession

66
00:08:45.820 --> 00:08:48.460
in December 2007.

67
00:08:48.460 --> 00:08:53.700
The unemployment rate is still near its peak for the past three years.

68
00:08:53.700 --> 00:09:23.700
between nine and a half and ten percent and that's the official narrowly defined unemployment rate and if we add in people such as those people working part-time who say they would prefer full-time work and others who've perhaps given up looking for employment out of the belief that they're not going to find any we can generate a much bigger rate of unemployment perhaps twice as big as the official narrow rate so so

69
00:09:23.700 --> 00:09:30.460
So, this is not a recovery at this point, and a lot of people have mocked the NBER's announcement

70
00:09:30.460 --> 00:09:37.820
recently that the recession ended in the middle of 2009.

71
00:09:37.820 --> 00:09:42.480
In a way, I think people have been too hard on the committee at the NBER because when

72
00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:49.700
they say the recession is over, what they mean is that they've considered a variety

73
00:09:49.700 --> 00:09:57.180
of Economic Indicators and taking them all into account in actually a very subjective

74
00:09:57.180 --> 00:10:05.620
way. They've concluded that overall, all things considered, all things they've considered

75
00:10:05.620 --> 00:10:13.640
being taken into account, the economy's movement is no longer downward. Now, what it looks

76
00:10:13.640 --> 00:10:19.360
What it looks like to me is that that may be so, but it's not much upward either.

77
00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:25.120
So it may be that for the past year and a half or so we've been at this very flat bottom.

78
00:10:25.120 --> 00:10:28.320
Now that doesn't tell us anything about the future.

79
00:10:28.320 --> 00:10:33.480
It may be that there's further decline ahead of us, or it may be that indeed things will

80
00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:35.520
gradually get better.

81
00:10:35.520 --> 00:10:41.360
I'm not a prophet, and so I can't give you anything that'll help you make your bets in

82
00:10:41.360 --> 00:10:49.640
in the markets, but I won't be surprised if things get worse, and I won't be surprised

83
00:10:49.640 --> 00:10:51.080
if things get a little bit better.

84
00:10:51.080 --> 00:10:56.160
The only thing that would surprise me is that if there's a really robust recovery, because

85
00:10:56.160 --> 00:11:04.600
I think in view of what the government has done, that's almost impossible to imagine

86
00:11:04.600 --> 00:11:11.560
that the economy will have the ability to overcome all the discouragements and obstacles

87
00:11:11.560 --> 00:11:18.940
that the government is put in the way of genuine recovery. So I think we may just be in for

88
00:11:18.940 --> 00:11:26.020
a long period of stagnation and that would probably be my single best guess about what

89
00:11:26.020 --> 00:11:33.100
lies ahead of us in the next few years.

90
00:11:33.100 --> 00:11:39.100
I want to talk about these policies not, however, as failed policies.

91
00:11:39.100 --> 00:11:43.660
That term, I don't know who invented the idea of failed policies, but I began to hear about

92
00:11:43.660 --> 00:11:46.780
it a long time ago.

93
00:11:46.780 --> 00:11:50.460
And people would criticize a variety of government programs.

94
00:11:50.460 --> 00:11:53.660
They'd talk about, say, the war on poverty.

95
00:11:53.660 --> 00:11:55.900
That's a failed policy.

96
00:11:55.900 --> 00:12:02.420
The government has spent hundreds of billions of dollars in the war on poverty, and the

97
00:12:02.420 --> 00:12:07.400
Percentage of people in poverty, according to the government's official measure, hardly

98
00:12:07.400 --> 00:12:13.540
budges. It's hardly budged in 40 years. So you spend all this money, you had all these

99
00:12:13.540 --> 00:12:19.100
programs and there's still all these tens of millions of people in poverty, at least

100
00:12:19.100 --> 00:12:27.860
in official poverty. So that's a failed program. Or the drug war. People say, okay, they spend

101
00:12:27.860 --> 00:12:35.160
all this money, they put millions of people in prison for a period of time, they have

102
00:12:35.160 --> 00:12:42.060
millions of people out on probation for drug offenses, et cetera, et cetera, and yet drug

103
00:12:42.060 --> 00:12:53.600
usage doesn't seem to be any lower than it was 30 years ago. Failed policy. Or education.

104
00:12:53.600 --> 00:13:01.080
And spending per student in real terms has more than doubled in the last three decades

105
00:13:01.080 --> 00:13:02.480
or so.

106
00:13:02.480 --> 00:13:07.520
And yet if you look at measures of student performance, such as their scores on standardized

107
00:13:07.520 --> 00:13:11.720
tests, they haven't come up appreciably at all.

108
00:13:11.720 --> 00:13:17.600
They're still down at that level to which they fell in the late 60s and early 70s.

109
00:13:17.600 --> 00:13:23.080
So public education is a failed policy.

110
00:13:23.080 --> 00:13:33.200
Well, I think we need to step back and say, failed for whom?

111
00:13:33.200 --> 00:13:40.320
And what I want to advance is a general proposition that I'll apply today to the government's

112
00:13:40.320 --> 00:13:44.640
reactions to the present crisis, but we can apply it much more broadly.

113
00:13:44.640 --> 00:13:51.720
And that is the proposition that the state does not stick with any policy that doesn't

114
00:13:51.720 --> 00:14:01.480
work for the state very long. The state is capable of turning almost on a dime if the

115
00:14:01.480 --> 00:14:09.280
state is not getting what it wants from the policy. And there's any amount of evidence,

116
00:14:09.280 --> 00:14:17.220
anecdotal at least, to sustain this proposition. In the war on poverty, it was a kind of running

117
00:14:17.220 --> 00:14:19.220
The War on Poverty

118
00:14:47.220 --> 00:14:53.460
Poverty was a great deal for government employees and the people that got paid to do all the

119
00:14:53.460 --> 00:14:59.860
things the government pretended it was doing to eliminate poverty.

120
00:14:59.860 --> 00:15:07.500
So that was a great success and that's exactly why the war on poverty continues to this day.

121
00:15:07.500 --> 00:15:13.220
Not all, but most of these poverty fighting agencies and programs continue and actually

122
00:15:13.220 --> 00:15:27.220
The Drug War has been a fantastic success. I don't think there's a police department

123
00:15:27.220 --> 00:15:35.920
in America that won't go to bat for it. There's hardly a politician in America who won't go

124
00:15:35.920 --> 00:15:42.400
to bat for it. And if we could get out there and get their opinions, I don't think there's

125
00:15:42.400 --> 00:15:48.960
There's a drug lord in the world that won't go to bat for it.

126
00:15:48.960 --> 00:15:52.600
Because these are the major beneficiaries of the war on drugs.

127
00:15:52.600 --> 00:16:01.280
Politicians, police, everybody from the local cops right up through the DEA head, and the

128
00:16:01.280 --> 00:16:08.800
politicians and the gangs, the drugs that do the major drug trafficking in the Western

129
00:16:08.800 --> 00:16:15.760
in Hemisphere, and bring these gigantic amounts of illegal substances into this country, as

130
00:16:15.760 --> 00:16:22.360
well as, of course, we have all the production here within our borders of drugs.

131
00:16:22.360 --> 00:16:32.320
So these are wonderful sources of income and political gain for these particular groups.

132
00:16:32.320 --> 00:16:37.920
They don't want to give them up at all, and so they work very hard to lie to us, as Tom

133
00:16:37.920 --> 00:16:43.960
Tom DiLorenzo was just explaining in the last talk about the effects of drugs and about

134
00:16:43.960 --> 00:16:47.040
how successful their efforts are and so forth.

135
00:16:47.040 --> 00:16:49.360
It's all baloney.

136
00:16:49.360 --> 00:16:52.120
There's not a word of truth in it, you know?

137
00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:59.920
It's like that famous statement Mary McCarthy made about one of her literary enemies, that

138
00:16:59.920 --> 00:17:06.480
every word she writes is a lie, including a and and the, you know?

139
00:17:06.480 --> 00:17:16.320
Every word the government says about drugs is a lie, including a, an and the. Education

140
00:17:16.320 --> 00:17:25.320
is anything but a failed policy. You go check with the National Education Association, and

141
00:17:25.320 --> 00:17:32.960
I dare say you'll find very few of the members of that group that don't fully support increased

142
00:17:32.960 --> 00:17:39.840
Just funding from various levels of government for government education.

143
00:17:39.840 --> 00:17:49.120
So when we see important political groups who have control of a program and the program

144
00:17:49.120 --> 00:17:54.840
is working for them, that program persists.

145
00:17:54.840 --> 00:18:00.560
If we see a program that doesn't work for them, they give it up and they go on to something

146
00:18:00.560 --> 00:18:10.920
That's the nature of failed policies. The state doesn't stick with failed policies.

147
00:18:10.920 --> 00:18:17.640
I think when we consider how the state operates, we need to do something that is rarely done,

148
00:18:17.640 --> 00:18:23.960
which is to back up and consider what the state is trying to do. What is the objective

149
00:18:23.960 --> 00:18:29.080
here? When we teach economics, we say the consumer has an objective in mainstream economics.

150
00:18:29.080 --> 00:18:34.760
He's trying to maximize utility, and we write out an equation, we say he's trying to maximize

151
00:18:34.760 --> 00:18:36.980
the value of that objective function.

152
00:18:36.980 --> 00:18:38.740
What is the producer trying to do?

153
00:18:38.740 --> 00:18:39.740
Maximize profits.

154
00:18:39.740 --> 00:18:41.340
We write out a profit function.

155
00:18:41.340 --> 00:18:48.020
We do calculus to find out exactly how that firm can maximize its profits and so forth.

156
00:18:48.020 --> 00:18:55.520
So we have an idea when we do economic analysis, certainly, of what a certain class of actors

157
00:18:55.520 --> 00:18:57.360
is trying to do.

158
00:18:57.360 --> 00:19:13.360
Well, what is the state trying to do? I think it varies a little bit depending on which part of the state we look at, but certainly they have in common the idea that every part of the state would like to get more money at its disposal.

159
00:19:13.360 --> 00:19:18.360
Now why they want more money and what they're going to do with more money varies a little bit.

160
00:19:18.360 --> 00:19:30.360
The executive branch, and I'm going to describe the state in five parts, four of which constitute its core, and the fifth part constitutes what I call its outer layer.

161
00:19:30.360 --> 00:19:40.360
The executive branch of government wants more power, basically, and of course it wants more money to dispose of,

162
00:19:40.360 --> 00:19:43.920
because that's how executive government officials

163
00:19:43.920 --> 00:19:47.960
make personally profitable political trades

164
00:19:47.960 --> 00:19:51.440
with their supporters is largely by the use of money

165
00:19:51.440 --> 00:19:53.440
they direct to their friends.

166
00:19:53.440 --> 00:19:58.000
But they like power too even if there's no money

167
00:19:58.000 --> 00:20:01.440
that goes along with it, they'll settle for mere power

168
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:02.960
if that's the best they can do.

169
00:20:02.960 --> 00:20:07.960
So power and money, Congress wants mainly more money

170
00:20:07.960 --> 00:20:33.960
But of course, if it creates new government powers, it allows itself to get more money and the more programs Congress creates, the more new laws it passes, particularly the bigger, more complex the laws are, the better position the Congress or a state legislature is in to practice extortion.

171
00:20:33.960 --> 00:20:42.960
There's a, you know, a lot of people think that corporations and trade associations and so forth, they're vile, they go to government and they bribe them.

172
00:20:42.960 --> 00:20:51.960
True. They do. Lots of people try to bribe public officials, especially legislators, in various ways.

173
00:20:51.960 --> 00:20:57.960
It's not always cash in a plain brown wrapper. There are a variety of ways to bribe a member of Congress.

174
00:20:57.960 --> 00:21:10.960
Some of them are actually legal, but a lot of what Congress is doing that people think is the result of bribery is actually the result of extortion, it's hold-up.

175
00:21:10.960 --> 00:21:20.960
Congress says, we're thinking about passing a certain regulation or law, and then they wait for people to come and pay them not to.

176
00:21:20.960 --> 00:21:26.960
There's a book by Fred McChesney about this very practice called Money for Nothing.

177
00:21:26.960 --> 00:21:34.240
So when Congress doesn't do anything, it's because they're getting paid to not do anything.

178
00:21:34.240 --> 00:21:38.600
And the minute they get paid more to do something is when they do something.

179
00:21:38.600 --> 00:21:43.960
They're not fools, they know where their bread is buttered.

180
00:21:43.960 --> 00:21:50.440
So Congress wants more money and more huge complex legislation is the best way to get

181
00:21:50.440 --> 00:21:51.440
it.

182
00:21:51.440 --> 00:21:54.000
The bureaucracy wants bigger budgets.

183
00:21:54.000 --> 00:22:00.040
Bill Niskanen wrote a book back in the 60s called Bureaucracy and his working idea was

184
00:22:00.040 --> 00:22:05.900
that the bureaucracy is simply trying to maximize its budget as that allows it to do all the

185
00:22:05.900 --> 00:22:14.900
things it wants to do, hire more people, have plusher offices, more perks and so forth,

186
00:22:14.900 --> 00:22:20.940
as well as push people around as regulators like to do.

187
00:22:20.940 --> 00:22:28.300
And finally, the fourth element of the state's inner core is what I call the Palace Guards.

188
00:22:28.300 --> 00:22:35.940
Literally, they're the people who carry weapons, the CIA, the FBI, the intelligence agencies,

189
00:22:35.940 --> 00:22:41.440
the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security.

190
00:22:41.440 --> 00:22:43.280
These people all want bigger budgets.

191
00:22:43.280 --> 00:22:45.240
They want more tasks.

192
00:22:45.240 --> 00:22:50.540
They want more things they have to watch or keep under surveillance or crack down on or

193
00:22:50.540 --> 00:23:08.540
Whatever. So no government can last very long unless it has palace guards to defend it because some other thugs will come along and take over if they don't have people who are willing to kill to protect those who employ them.

194
00:23:08.540 --> 00:23:38.540
Now, finally, around this core of the state, we have the state's outer layer, which is the major private supporters, or what you might call fascist co-conspirators, a lot of big corporations, major lobbies, trade, labor, and professional associations. And these people are all angling to get a share of the loot. They want more money, they want their goods purchased at public expense, they want subsidies, tax favors, legal

195
00:23:38.540 --> 00:24:05.540
So how did this work in the last three years? What did the state get, which justifies my saying, the state's policies have been enormously successful in the current crisis?

196
00:24:05.540 --> 00:24:10.140
Well, first of all, I said everybody wants more money in the state.

197
00:24:10.140 --> 00:24:31.940
Well, they've got a lot more money at their disposal now because government spending relative to GDP has gone up from 21% in 2008 fiscal year to 25% in fiscal 9 and 10 and probably 11 and 12 and so forth as we look ahead.

198
00:24:31.940 --> 00:24:45.940
A jump of four percentage points of government outlays relative to GDP. This is federal outlays, which is an enormous jump for peacetime.

199
00:24:45.940 --> 00:24:56.940
So this is a big gain for government in control over resources. We talk a lot about taxes, but the effective tax is measured by government spending,

200
00:24:56.940 --> 00:25:02.100
not by the actual amount of revenue collected because even if the government

201
00:25:02.100 --> 00:25:07.860
borrows the money or prints the money, the tax consists of the part of total

202
00:25:07.860 --> 00:25:14.100
output that is being grabbed by the state through its purchases or in other

203
00:25:14.100 --> 00:25:20.260
ways. So spending has gone way up. The government has given itself many new

204
00:25:20.260 --> 00:25:26.860
powers to enforce, administer and use it as means of extortion. It's taken control

205
00:25:26.860 --> 00:25:40.740
of some enormous private or semi-private institutions, including, most notably, Fannie, Freddie, AIG,

206
00:25:40.740 --> 00:25:42.260
General Motors and Chrysler.

207
00:25:42.260 --> 00:25:48.380
I mean, four years ago, somebody told you the government is going to take over those.

208
00:25:48.380 --> 00:25:51.100
Would you have thought that very likely?

209
00:25:51.100 --> 00:25:53.820
I would not have.

210
00:25:53.820 --> 00:25:59.180
Even now, you know, I'm quite digested that the government just took over these enormous

211
00:25:59.180 --> 00:26:08.180
corporations and essentially nationalized them, you know, sometimes not quite officially formally

212
00:26:08.180 --> 00:26:14.620
nationalized, but through various hook and crook devices, they've taken control of these.

213
00:26:14.620 --> 00:26:23.320
And Fannie and Freddie, of course, along with the FHA and Veterans Administration and Jenny

214
00:26:23.320 --> 00:26:33.840
In May, that's the entire mortgage lending industry of America with very few exceptions.

215
00:26:33.840 --> 00:26:41.320
They either make or guarantee or purchase over 90% of all the mortgage loans now being

216
00:26:41.320 --> 00:26:43.000
made in the United States.

217
00:26:43.000 --> 00:26:47.960
The mortgage finance industry has been taken over by the state.

218
00:26:47.960 --> 00:26:51.400
Now think about who's connected to the mortgage financing industry.

219
00:26:51.400 --> 00:27:01.320
has a lot of repercussions. All the people who build homes, manage real estate developments,

220
00:27:01.320 --> 00:27:08.720
sell things that new homeowners would buy like furniture and what have you. These tentacles

221
00:27:08.720 --> 00:27:15.320
spread out a long way when the government takes over control of mortgage lending in

222
00:27:15.320 --> 00:27:21.720
in this country and it has done that. Through the TARP program, it took an ownership position

223
00:27:21.720 --> 00:27:29.360
in almost 600 commercial banks and some investment banks that had quickly, virtually overnight,

224
00:27:29.360 --> 00:27:35.680
made themselves into commercial banks in order to get TARP money. So we don't really have

225
00:27:35.680 --> 00:27:42.160
any big investment banks anymore. People like Goldman Sachs are now commercial banks or

226
00:27:42.160 --> 00:27:45.280
holding companies for that purpose.

227
00:27:45.280 --> 00:27:53.440
So the big part of the banking industry was brought under even greater government control

228
00:27:53.440 --> 00:27:56.000
than before.

229
00:27:56.000 --> 00:28:02.120
Now Congress, of course, has passed huge statutes in the last couple of years.

230
00:28:02.120 --> 00:28:06.760
They're very complex and big in some cases, and so it means that members of Congress are

231
00:28:06.760 --> 00:28:13.160
are now in a much better position for their usual extortion, for money for nothing and

232
00:28:13.160 --> 00:28:20.680
for money for something. So every time the scope of government pushes out, the people

233
00:28:20.680 --> 00:28:27.680
who run the government are in a better position to plunder. The bureaucracy has grown by leaps

234
00:28:27.680 --> 00:28:34.400
and bounds and in this I would include the Fed because as some of our other speakers

235
00:28:34.400 --> 00:28:44.400
The Fed has dramatically changed its scope of operations from what it did historically.

236
00:28:44.400 --> 00:28:53.400
Historically it undertook monetary policy, which was manipulation of short-term interest rates and the money stock.

237
00:28:53.400 --> 00:29:01.400
But it did not do kind of financial industrial policy, that is, picking and choosing who would get its assistance.

238
00:29:01.400 --> 00:29:09.320
It did activities that affected everybody in the same way, but now it's undertaken a whole

239
00:29:09.320 --> 00:29:15.880
variety of programs in which the Fed has singled out specific types of financial industries

240
00:29:15.880 --> 00:29:17.400
for assistance.

241
00:29:17.400 --> 00:29:25.260
And all these alphabet programs that you see if you try to read a Fed report signify some

242
00:29:25.260 --> 00:29:27.720
form of credit policy.

243
00:29:27.720 --> 00:29:35.840
It's going to people who issue commercial paper, people who issue asset-backed securities,

244
00:29:35.840 --> 00:29:45.960
people who do this, that and the other, and the Fed has basically gone out and given these

245
00:29:45.960 --> 00:29:51.520
people deposits at the Fed in exchange for their crappy securities.

246
00:29:51.520 --> 00:29:59.240
And so in that way, it actually assisted not everybody, but certain specific beneficiaries

247
00:29:59.240 --> 00:30:04.760
or certain industries that benefited, but not others.

248
00:30:04.760 --> 00:30:07.800
It was definitely picking and choosing.

249
00:30:07.800 --> 00:30:14.320
So the Fed has greatly expanded its type of operations.

250
00:30:14.320 --> 00:30:20.580
It's become much more of a central planner through the adoption of credit policy laid

251
00:30:20.580 --> 00:30:23.080
on top of Monetary Policy.

252
00:30:23.080 --> 00:30:29.360
So this is this distinction some people have drawn between qualitative easing and quantitative

253
00:30:29.360 --> 00:30:30.360
easing.

254
00:30:30.360 --> 00:30:36.060
And in the process, of course, it's more than doubled its portfolio and produced the

255
00:30:36.060 --> 00:30:41.760
most astonishing graph I've ever seen as an economist, you know, the graph of excess

256
00:30:41.760 --> 00:30:47.340
reserves in the commercial banking system, you know, which hugs the horizontal axis

257
00:30:47.340 --> 00:30:58.060
for 50 years, and then almost instantaneously shoots up like an ICBM taking off in October

258
00:30:58.060 --> 00:31:02.580
2008 through January 2009.

259
00:31:02.580 --> 00:31:08.900
Over a trillion dollars in new reserves comes into being owing to the feds going out and

260
00:31:08.900 --> 00:31:14.440
flinging money at these beneficiaries in the financial industries.

261
00:31:14.440 --> 00:31:21.800
So that's a huge change and there's more that goes with that I'll come back to in a second.

262
00:31:21.800 --> 00:31:27.940
The Health Care Act that Congress has passed makes everybody who works for Health and Human

263
00:31:27.940 --> 00:31:32.260
Services feel as if he's died and gone to heaven.

264
00:31:32.260 --> 00:31:38.160
Just imagine the increased scope of operation that those bureaucrats are going to have to

265
00:31:38.160 --> 00:31:40.400
administer Obamacare.

266
00:31:40.400 --> 00:31:48.400
Care. This law is over 2,300 pages of dense legal ease, and of course nobody still knows

267
00:31:48.400 --> 00:31:53.920
what's in it completely, but we know enough to know that this is going to be hog heaven

268
00:31:53.920 --> 00:32:01.360
for a big federal department as far as the eye can see. And of course some Republicans

269
00:32:01.360 --> 00:32:08.860
are talking about repealing Obamacare, but I wouldn't bet the farm on that, nor would

270
00:32:08.860 --> 00:32:28.380
And the Financial Reform Act passed recently. Again, more than 2,300 pages, very dense provisions,

271
00:32:28.380 --> 00:32:37.100
obscure. We do know that it creates a variety of new powers for the Fed, for the Treasury,

272
00:32:37.100 --> 00:32:44.420
and for other federal agencies, it creates whole new institutions, especially the Bureau

273
00:32:44.420 --> 00:32:51.380
of Consumer Financial Protection, which gets scarier the more I read about it.

274
00:32:51.380 --> 00:32:59.180
And this agency is going to have tremendous discretionary power.

275
00:32:59.180 --> 00:33:05.140
It's lodged in the Fed, but supposedly is independent of the Fed, not answerable to

276
00:33:05.140 --> 00:33:12.060
to the Federal Reserve Board, but its head is appointed by the President, but, you know,

277
00:33:12.060 --> 00:33:18.700
some of these so-called independent regulatory agencies are not exactly completely independent,

278
00:33:18.700 --> 00:33:23.440
and I believe the reason it's lodged within the Fed is because that's where the Fed wanted

279
00:33:23.440 --> 00:33:29.520
it to be, where it can sort of dominate it and make sure that it doesn't do something

280
00:33:29.520 --> 00:33:35.200
that the people who had the Fed itself don't want done.

281
00:33:35.200 --> 00:33:40.740
But we shall see, it's another big crapshoot set in motion here.

282
00:33:40.740 --> 00:33:45.720
Then there's the creation of this Financial Stabilization Oversight Council, which involves

283
00:33:45.720 --> 00:33:51.920
a number of representatives from the Fed and various federal agencies.

284
00:33:51.920 --> 00:33:57.720
And their charge primarily, there are many other charges, but their main charge is supposed

285
00:33:57.720 --> 00:34:07.720
The theory is supposed to be that they look around for systemic risk, you know, like eagles.

286
00:34:07.720 --> 00:34:20.720
There it is. And when they see systemic risk looming, they now will have the authority to go shut down that institution or firm or bank or whatever it is,

287
00:34:20.720 --> 00:34:27.260
Anybody Involved in Financial Dealings Before They Fail and Set This Horrible Avalanche

288
00:34:27.260 --> 00:34:34.440
of Systemic Risk Disaster in Train.

289
00:34:34.440 --> 00:34:39.720
This reminds me of something Adam Smith said in his book, The Wealth of Nations, about

290
00:34:39.720 --> 00:34:47.560
the audacity of people who would undertake to plan investments for people in business.

291
00:34:47.560 --> 00:34:56.560
There would be a foolish thing for them to imagine they had the ability to do this and a dangerous thing if they were to do it.

292
00:34:56.560 --> 00:35:04.560
And I think this financial stabilization oversight council, if it does anything at all, will do very mischievous things.

293
00:35:04.560 --> 00:35:10.560
This is a new, as Roger Garrison would put it, a new loose cannon on the deck.

294
00:35:10.560 --> 00:35:17.960
in the deck. And it's going to be another important reason why people making plans about

295
00:35:17.960 --> 00:35:23.200
the future will be very uncertain before they launch any long-term project. Who knows what

296
00:35:23.200 --> 00:35:28.880
these guys are going to do? If they have the authority to just come in and close you, you

297
00:35:28.880 --> 00:35:33.600
don't have to be a bank. A variety of people involved in providing financial goods and

298
00:35:33.600 --> 00:35:40.500
services will be within the jurisdiction of this council. The Financial Reform Act requires

299
00:35:40.500 --> 00:35:51.780
According to one law firm, 67 new studies and 243 new rules. Don't you wish you were

300
00:35:51.780 --> 00:36:01.100
a lobbyist now? 243 new rules. That's like, you know, open the doors, boys, and let those

301
00:36:01.100 --> 00:36:07.460
lobbyists in. Of course, they're already there. They're like people who go to rock concerts

302
00:36:07.460 --> 00:36:33.020
The Palace Guards have prospered mightily, even though the Defense Department had almost

303
00:36:33.020 --> 00:36:37.620
is a doubling of its real budget in the previous decade.

304
00:36:37.620 --> 00:36:42.100
It's still increasing its budget through this crisis.

305
00:36:42.100 --> 00:36:50.220
Fiscal 1909, the basic Pentagon budget was $637 billion.

306
00:36:50.220 --> 00:36:53.460
Fiscal 11, it's supposed to be $711.

307
00:36:53.460 --> 00:36:57.220
That's a 13% increase in two years,

308
00:36:57.220 --> 00:37:00.540
which is pretty much real since prices aren't changing very much

309
00:37:00.540 --> 00:37:02.300
right now.

310
00:37:02.300 --> 00:37:09.460
So that's a very healthy increase in Pentagon funding, and at the same time, we're supporting

311
00:37:09.460 --> 00:37:17.980
now what I call the Security Industrial Congressional Complex, which consists of thousands and thousands

312
00:37:17.980 --> 00:37:25.580
of firms that came forth in response to the availability of federal money for spying on

313
00:37:25.580 --> 00:37:28.380
you, me and everybody else on earth.

314
00:37:28.380 --> 00:37:33.140
And so these people, I had an article a couple of years ago on Lew Rockwell about this, just

315
00:37:33.140 --> 00:37:40.500
astonishing how many firms are in this business of purporting to provide spying services of

316
00:37:40.500 --> 00:37:42.540
some kind or another.

317
00:37:42.540 --> 00:37:49.340
And the Washington Post had a three-part series on it recently in which they noted things

318
00:37:49.340 --> 00:37:58.740
such as, you know, many tasks are being done by 8, 9, 10 separate firms or contractors

319
00:37:58.740 --> 00:38:04.500
or agencies, no one of whom has any idea what the others are doing, but it doesn't really

320
00:38:04.500 --> 00:38:09.600
matter because the important thing is that the money be handed out. That's the whole

321
00:38:09.600 --> 00:38:18.500
idea of this, is to exploit our fears as usual in a crisis and to pass out loot in the process

322
00:38:18.500 --> 00:38:23.980
of Pretending to Protect Us from All of These Boogeymen.

323
00:38:23.980 --> 00:38:33.700
The Outer Layer, they've done fine, TARP doled out almost $200 billion to almost 600 commercial

324
00:38:33.700 --> 00:38:41.980
banks, and notice I said almost 200, the TARP appropriated 700, but they never dispersed

325
00:38:41.980 --> 00:38:51.340
nearly all of it they dispersed I think about 400 or so of the 700 and to banks only about 200

326
00:38:51.340 --> 00:38:58.860
billion but that's still a lot of money where I come from and so Wall Street cleaned up and

327
00:39:00.540 --> 00:39:05.660
they did it in a way by buying these preferred shares that you notice didn't dilute the ownership

328
00:39:05.660 --> 00:39:14.580
of the Common Shareholders, ever think about that? That was slick, wasn't it? They actually

329
00:39:14.580 --> 00:39:21.100
had done that in 1932 and three and four with the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, did

330
00:39:21.100 --> 00:39:25.580
the same thing, went out and bought preferred shares in banks and insurance companies and

331
00:39:25.580 --> 00:39:31.380
what have you. So that's one way that the government can bulk up the capital in these

332
00:39:31.380 --> 00:39:44.380
State, local and federal employees have done very nicely during the recession.

333
00:39:44.380 --> 00:39:46.780
Their pay has actually increased.

334
00:39:46.780 --> 00:39:53.140
Their numbers have not fallen, even though some 8 million private employees have lost

335
00:39:53.140 --> 00:39:57.460
their employment in the recession.

336
00:39:57.460 --> 00:40:27.460
like the United Auto Workers and various suppliers for the auto industry have been kept alive and propped up thanks to TARP money and the government keeping GM and Chrysler going and of course the military industrial complex, they always do well, come hell or high water, the spending for procurement plus research development tests and evaluation which is all pretty much contracted out,

337
00:40:27.460 --> 00:40:34.580
to private firms increased 5% between fiscal 09 and fiscal 11.

338
00:40:34.580 --> 00:40:41.980
So the outer layer has done nicely, the core has done beautifully.

339
00:40:41.980 --> 00:40:44.620
You and I have not done so well.

340
00:40:44.620 --> 00:40:52.940
And I would just leave you with the thought that it just might be that none of this is accidental

341
00:40:52.940 --> 00:40:59.940
and that this set of failed policies is anything but a failure.