WEBVTT

NOTE How (and Why) Washington Lies About Everything

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.120
Thanks to all the supporters for supporting the Mises Institute, especially some of you

2
00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:10.640
who have been here for years and years, and I've been around also for years and years

3
00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:15.440
at the Mises Institute for more than 20, I think, and I can remember this meeting, you

4
00:00:15.440 --> 00:00:23.440
know, the October meeting in the early days where we had about the same 20 or 22, 23 people

5
00:00:23.440 --> 00:00:27.160
every October, and it's grown quite a bit.

6
00:00:27.160 --> 00:00:35.120
And so the title I gave, as Doug said, is How and Why Washington Lies about Everything.

7
00:00:35.120 --> 00:00:42.720
And when they asked me to give a talk, a conference on Washington's Big Lie, it was perfect for

8
00:00:42.720 --> 00:00:51.560
me because back in 1992, my co-author James Bennett and I wrote this book, Official Lies,

9
00:00:51.560 --> 00:00:54.800
How Washington Misleads Us.

10
00:00:54.800 --> 00:00:57.400
And so I know a thing or two about government lying.

11
00:00:57.400 --> 00:01:01.400
Of course, you could write a book that would fill all of the bookshelf space here at the

12
00:01:01.400 --> 00:01:05.520
Mises Institute on government lies.

13
00:01:05.520 --> 00:01:09.000
And so I'm not going to go over and repeat a thousand government lies for you.

14
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:15.220
But I thought I'd start by mentioning a few statements that government has made, and maybe

15
00:01:15.220 --> 00:01:18.800
you can tell me whether you think it's a truth or a lie.

16
00:01:18.800 --> 00:01:22.000
And here's one.

17
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:23.000
Every vote counts.

18
00:01:23.000 --> 00:01:48.600
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, the right of the people to keep

19
00:01:48.600 --> 00:02:08.180
Keep and Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed, We Are Winning the War on Drugs, The Constitution

20
00:02:08.180 --> 00:02:17.240
Applies in Good Times and in Bad Times, Applies to What They Don't Say.

21
00:02:17.240 --> 00:02:26.240
Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars. We don't torture. That's a more recent one.

22
00:02:26.240 --> 00:02:32.240
And then Abraham Lincoln was a great humanitarian. That's another one that's in there.

23
00:02:32.240 --> 00:02:38.240
And so those are just a few off the top of my head things that I think about.

24
00:02:38.240 --> 00:02:43.240
And Joseph Schumpeter, whose picture is up here, Peter had Joseph Schumpeter's picture up here.

25
00:02:43.240 --> 00:03:08.520
The picture of the prettiest girl that ever lived will in the long run prove powerless

26
00:03:08.520 --> 00:03:12.400
to maintain the sales of a bad cigarette.

27
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:17.800
There is no equally effective safeguard, however, in the case of political decisions.

28
00:03:17.800 --> 00:03:22.520
Many decisions of fateful importance are of a nature that makes it impossible for the

29
00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:27.600
public to experiment with them at its leisure and at moderate cost.

30
00:03:27.600 --> 00:03:33.520
Even if that is possible, however, judgment is as a rule not so easy to arrive at as it

31
00:03:33.520 --> 00:03:37.720
is in the case of the cigarette, because the effects are less easy to interpret.

32
00:03:37.720 --> 00:03:40.560
That's a little bit long-winded, but it's a good point.

33
00:03:40.560 --> 00:03:45.360
If you compare private advertising in the market to what the government does, and you

34
00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:50.840
could call it advertising, I guess, self-promotion and advertising, there are these fundamental,

35
00:03:50.840 --> 00:03:54.400
very fundamental differences in the incentive system there.

36
00:03:54.400 --> 00:03:58.560
And I wrote an article about this, it was in the Baltimore Sun about a month ago, and

37
00:03:58.560 --> 00:04:03.960
it was reprinted on lewrockwell.com, it's sort of related to this point, and it was

38
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:09.700
the title the Sun gave it, it was kind of a very clunky title, it was Business Ethics

39
00:04:09.700 --> 00:04:39.700
The point of the article was, for years I've been annoyed at universities who teach business ethics, and especially mine, my university, at the time, like right now, they're running ads on the radio in Baltimore, that say, learn a different way of doing business, that is, they assume if you're in business, you're by definition immoral, so come and be lectured to by one of our professors,

40
00:04:39.700 --> 00:04:44.100
for our left-wing lawyers, and we will make you a moral person.

41
00:04:44.100 --> 00:04:46.260
They don't literally say that, but that's what would happen

42
00:04:46.260 --> 00:04:48.460
if you were a business person in Baltimore

43
00:04:48.460 --> 00:04:51.540
and you signed up for the MBA program at my university

44
00:04:51.540 --> 00:04:53.180
on the basis of, well, you want to learn

45
00:04:53.180 --> 00:04:54.540
about business ethics.

46
00:04:54.540 --> 00:04:57.300
They literally have lawyers and only lawyers

47
00:04:57.300 --> 00:04:58.460
who teach about ethics.

48
00:04:58.460 --> 00:05:00.620
And I've always thought that was hilarious,

49
00:05:00.620 --> 00:05:03.700
that the lawyers don't ever teach you about ethics.

50
00:05:03.700 --> 00:05:06.860
I mean, but that's what I do.

51
00:05:06.860 --> 00:05:14.460
But the point I made was that, you know, really a simple point, you know, if you're a liar in business, well, there's a penalty to be paid.

52
00:05:14.460 --> 00:05:20.580
There's a market feedback mechanism. Consumers will catch on if you defraud them. You won't get repeat customers.

53
00:05:20.580 --> 00:05:27.100
Suppliers are not going to want to do business with you. Your competitors will have every incentive to point out your lies or your fraud.

54
00:05:27.100 --> 00:05:36.620
You may be sued and so forth. And that doesn't guarantee honesty, but it sure provides a reward for honesty in terms of customer loyalty.

55
00:05:36.620 --> 00:05:39.060
and profits.

56
00:05:39.060 --> 00:05:40.540
And I had one of the guest speakers.

57
00:05:40.540 --> 00:05:42.220
I had a lecture series in my university

58
00:05:42.220 --> 00:05:45.860
was Rabbi Daniel Lapin, who was here, I think, two years ago.

59
00:05:45.860 --> 00:05:48.020
He gave a talk a year and a half ago.

60
00:05:48.020 --> 00:05:49.980
And one of the points he made in his talk

61
00:05:49.980 --> 00:05:54.100
was in his research, he went on a tour of the South,

62
00:05:54.100 --> 00:05:57.260
conducting research on Jewish businesses that have

63
00:05:57.260 --> 00:05:59.380
been around for generations.

64
00:05:59.380 --> 00:06:01.820
And what Rabbi Lapin found is that he

65
00:06:01.820 --> 00:06:04.340
found all these examples of communities

66
00:06:04.340 --> 00:06:34.340
and all throughout the South, where for generations, there have been close relationships between the local merchant and the community, they all know each other personally, they're friends, and the main point he made in talking to this group of students is that, well, how could that exist if they're cheating and defrauding these people, you know, year in, year out, generation in, generation out? Well, it couldn't, you know, it's not the nature of competitive capitalism that you get cheated, but it seems to me that, and so the point of my article in the Baltimore Sun,

67
00:06:34.340 --> 00:06:39.660
One was that if you want to teach people about ethical problems in society, well, government

68
00:06:39.660 --> 00:06:41.740
is where the real big problems are.

69
00:06:41.740 --> 00:06:48.060
It's like thinking, well, there's a fly on the carpet here, and that's a problem, whereas

70
00:06:48.060 --> 00:06:52.940
there's a dinosaur out there, Tyrannosaurus rex, charging toward this room.

71
00:06:52.940 --> 00:06:53.940
Let's ignore that.

72
00:06:53.940 --> 00:06:54.940
That's nothing to worry about.

73
00:06:54.940 --> 00:06:57.340
Let's get the fly.

74
00:06:57.340 --> 00:07:00.800
And so that's basically the point I made.

75
00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:04.440
Maybe later during cocktails I'll tell you about some of the hilarious email hate mail

76
00:07:04.440 --> 00:07:11.920
I got from some of the local commies in Baltimore about this, including the county executive

77
00:07:11.920 --> 00:07:19.160
in Baltimore County who's a big lefty and accused me of defending the Salmonella outbreak

78
00:07:19.160 --> 00:07:23.080
in eggs that was in the news a couple of weeks ago.

79
00:07:23.080 --> 00:07:24.760
But the incentives are totally different.

80
00:07:24.760 --> 00:07:29.040
In government there is no market feedback mechanism that penalizes you for being a liar.

81
00:07:29.040 --> 00:07:59.040
In fact, Murray Rothbard, in one of his articles, his article on Just War, he mentioned Abe Lincoln, and he said, you know, historians all call Abe Lincoln a master politician, and he was, he was, I tell people he was Bill Clinton times 10,000 in terms of being a slippery politician, but Murray's definition of a master politician is a masterful liar, conniver and manipulator, and so, and that's the way the system is, that's what gets rewarded

82
00:07:59.040 --> 00:08:05.240
and Politics, I would argue, because the government gives itself a tremendous degree of autonomy

83
00:08:05.240 --> 00:08:10.600
compared to businesses who constantly have to strive to please their customers.

84
00:08:10.600 --> 00:08:16.920
And here's an example of what businesses do to give themselves this, or not businesses,

85
00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:18.880
government, to give itself this autonomy.

86
00:08:18.880 --> 00:08:27.640
I don't know if people in the back can see this, but what this is is a bar chart of re-election

87
00:08:27.640 --> 00:08:47.640
Over the years of the U.S. House of Representatives, and I'm going to show you the Senate, it begins in 1964 and ends in 2008, and if you look at the House of Representatives, the average is about 97%.

88
00:08:47.640 --> 00:08:56.640
Even in 1994, the Republican Revolution year, there was still 84% re-election rate in the House of Representatives.

89
00:08:56.640 --> 00:09:04.640
In the Senate, there's a little more variation in the Senate, but the average still looks to be around 80 to 85% in the Senate.

90
00:09:04.640 --> 00:09:11.640
And so, with gerrymandering and huge staffs, which are essentially taxpayer-financed campaign staffs,

91
00:09:11.640 --> 00:09:17.640
The Congress has rigged the system so that almost nothing can unseat them.

92
00:09:17.640 --> 00:09:21.640
Barney Frank, for goodness sake, is still in the Congress.

93
00:09:21.640 --> 00:09:26.640
When I lived in the DC area years ago and I would read the Washington Post,

94
00:09:26.640 --> 00:09:31.640
I think it's been 15, maybe 20 years now, I can't remember exactly when,

95
00:09:31.640 --> 00:09:37.640
but Barney got caught, his boyfriend was running a prostitution ring out of the basement of their house.

96
00:09:37.640 --> 00:09:38.640
House.

97
00:09:38.640 --> 00:09:41.920
He was on the front page of the Washington Post for a whole week, and of course nothing

98
00:09:41.920 --> 00:09:45.480
happened to him other than he's been re-elected ten times since that.

99
00:09:45.480 --> 00:09:51.940
So you can, I mean, would you not end up in jail if you were running a prostitution ring

100
00:09:51.940 --> 00:09:54.920
in your town?

101
00:09:54.920 --> 00:09:57.920
Don't answer that.

102
00:09:57.920 --> 00:10:01.480
But, so you can get away with almost anything.

103
00:10:01.480 --> 00:10:06.700
I grew up in Pennsylvania and there was this politician there, a congressman named Flood,

104
00:10:06.700 --> 00:10:10.740
And he looked just like Snidely Whiplash in the Bullwinkle cartoons.

105
00:10:10.740 --> 00:10:12.980
He had a handlebar mustache.

106
00:10:12.980 --> 00:10:17.920
He wore a big fedora hat and a cape, a black cape.

107
00:10:17.920 --> 00:10:18.920
I'm not making this up.

108
00:10:18.920 --> 00:10:22.220
I could probably find them on Google and find Congressman Flood.

109
00:10:22.220 --> 00:10:27.480
And he was convicted of a felony, but I guess the Pennsylvania electoral system, he appealed

110
00:10:27.480 --> 00:10:31.820
and I think the electoral system, the laws said if it's under appeal, he can still run

111
00:10:31.820 --> 00:10:32.820
for reelection.

112
00:10:32.820 --> 00:10:36.820
And then if he loses the appeal, then he goes, you know, he can't be a congressman.

113
00:10:36.820 --> 00:10:42.820
But he was re-elected. And at the time, I was a teenager at the time, I still remember this in the newspaper.

114
00:10:42.820 --> 00:10:46.820
They asked people, why did you vote for Congressman Flood? Everyone knows he's a crook.

115
00:10:46.820 --> 00:10:49.820
And the general answer was, well, yes, they're all crooks.

116
00:10:49.820 --> 00:10:55.820
But he's a pretty good crook that brings back a lot of pork to our district for road building projects and all that.

117
00:10:55.820 --> 00:10:57.820
So we like him for that reason.

118
00:10:57.820 --> 00:11:07.820
So you can even be a felon, of course, and a lot of people have no problem as long as you keep bringing home the bacon, as they call it.

119
00:11:07.820 --> 00:11:15.820
And so, because the system is so rigged like this, there's so much autonomy, you can get away with lying.

120
00:11:15.820 --> 00:11:17.820
There's no penalty for lying.

121
00:11:17.820 --> 00:11:21.820
And on top of that, there's the economic principle that's known as rational ignorance.

122
00:11:21.820 --> 00:11:30.820
The people are rationally ignorant. That is, most of us spend most of our time educating ourselves on how to do our job, how to raise our families and so forth.

123
00:11:30.820 --> 00:11:36.820
And you don't really spend that much time educating yourself on social policy.

124
00:11:36.820 --> 00:11:46.820
In fact, when I talk about this to college students, I bring up on the computer in the classroom the alphabetical listing of federal agencies.

125
00:11:46.820 --> 00:12:16.820
If you just Google that, you know, there's a big long list, and if you just pick one or two of them out, there'll be a brief description of what it does, and it sounds like, you know, it's hieroglyphics, you know, so no human mind could possibly understand, you know, a tiny, tiny percentage of 1% of what the government does, and therefore we're all rationally ignorant, and that enables the government to get away with a lot of this misinformation that it spreads to us.

126
00:12:16.820 --> 00:12:21.620
And another point about government and misinformation or misinformation is, you know, the purpose

127
00:12:21.620 --> 00:12:25.020
of advertising, real advertising, is its competition.

128
00:12:25.020 --> 00:12:27.660
It's a way of competing advertising.

129
00:12:27.660 --> 00:12:30.700
But government is usually a monopoly in things it does.

130
00:12:30.700 --> 00:12:34.580
So you have to ask yourself, why does government advertise if it's a monopoly?

131
00:12:34.580 --> 00:12:40.260
Well, the only logical explanation, I think, is just to get the public to acquiesce in

132
00:12:40.260 --> 00:12:45.460
whatever it's doing, you know, not to compete because it doesn't compete, doesn't have

133
00:12:45.460 --> 00:13:07.460
And of course, one other point before I give you some examples is debt and inflation are the best tools the government has for hiding and lying to us about the true cost of government, not just the cost of wars, but the cost of government in general when it finances them with debt and inflation.

134
00:13:07.460 --> 00:13:13.460
And so, these are just some comments on how the government goes about lying to us.

135
00:13:13.460 --> 00:13:20.460
And maybe I should give John Kenneth Galbraith a good kick in the butt here while I have a chance.

136
00:13:20.460 --> 00:13:26.460
Galbraith's whole career was based on telling the same story over and over again.

137
00:13:26.460 --> 00:13:30.460
Basically, he wrote several books that basically say the same thing,

138
00:13:30.460 --> 00:13:36.460
that advertising dupes us into spending too much of our money on things that we don't really need.

139
00:13:36.460 --> 00:13:42.620
and therefore the government should tax us more because we're wasting our money

140
00:13:42.620 --> 00:13:46.780
on things that we want and we should build more things that John Kenneth

141
00:13:46.780 --> 00:13:51.540
Galbraith wants like statues of him in Cambridge Massachusetts or something

142
00:13:51.540 --> 00:13:55.180
like that that the government should put up. He spent his whole life doing that

143
00:13:55.180 --> 00:13:59.380
and a lot of Americans still believe this to the extent that Americans have

144
00:13:59.380 --> 00:14:04.260
any economic knowledge or they think they have economic knowledge that a lot

145
00:14:04.260 --> 00:14:07.660
A lot of them are Galbraithians, whether they've read his books or not, they were taught this

146
00:14:07.660 --> 00:14:10.580
in school at some point, and they had this idea.

147
00:14:10.580 --> 00:14:15.620
Friedrich Hayek debunked this, though, in a famous article called The Non-Secretary of

148
00:14:15.620 --> 00:14:22.420
the Dependence Effect, it was in the Southern Economic Journal around 1960, and Galbraith's

149
00:14:22.420 --> 00:14:30.540
famous slogan was that because of all this advertising, that we have a private affluence

150
00:14:30.540 --> 00:14:37.660
Amidst Public Squalor, that is, the government sector is in squalor, it's just so small,

151
00:14:37.660 --> 00:14:41.620
but we have affluence everywhere, and we're all just too stingy and we don't give the

152
00:14:41.620 --> 00:14:47.860
government enough of our money, and that was always the basis of it, but the basis of his

153
00:14:47.860 --> 00:14:53.060
argument was that only the innate wants are worthwhile, the ones that are innate within

154
00:14:53.060 --> 00:14:57.860
our own minds are worthwhile and worth spending our money on, and not the ones that are brought

155
00:14:57.860 --> 00:15:05.860
And in short Hayek responded by saying, well, food, shelter and sex are probably the only innate wants.

156
00:15:05.860 --> 00:15:11.860
Everything else is brought to our attention by somebody else, including the books of John Kenneth Galbraith.

157
00:15:11.860 --> 00:15:18.860
So if only the innate wants are worth anything, that would mean the Bible is worthless, Shakespeare is worthless,

158
00:15:18.860 --> 00:15:21.860
and as I said the books of John Kenneth Galbraith are worthless.

159
00:15:21.860 --> 00:15:24.860
But Galbraith of course got it all backwards.

160
00:15:24.860 --> 00:15:40.860
It's government propaganda and lying and advertising, if you want to call it that, that creates the imbalance in terms of a government that is much too big, much bigger than it would be if the citizens had more accurate information about what the government is up to.

161
00:15:40.860 --> 00:15:44.860
So now I'm going to give a few examples in the rest of my time.

162
00:15:44.860 --> 00:15:48.860
As I said, Jim Bennett and I read a whole book about this years ago.

163
00:15:48.860 --> 00:15:59.860
I did a little research on how Prohibition came about in the 1920s.

164
00:15:59.860 --> 00:16:03.860
What was the crusade for Prohibition? Who was for it? What did they say?

165
00:16:03.860 --> 00:16:11.860
One of the things I ran across is that the Women's Christian Temperance Union had a Department of Scientific Temperance

166
00:16:11.860 --> 00:16:17.860
and they got all the public schools in the country to teach students about alcohol consumption.

167
00:16:17.860 --> 00:16:24.860
And so this was a government program. This is before prohibition. This is sort of laying the groundwork for prohibition.

168
00:16:24.860 --> 00:16:32.860
So I thought I'd read to you these things and maybe some of you are medical professionals and you can tell us whether these are truths or lies.

169
00:16:32.860 --> 00:16:38.860
The majority of beer drinkers die from dropsy.

170
00:16:38.860 --> 00:16:44.860
When alcohol passes down the throat, it burns off skin, leaving it bare and burning.

171
00:16:44.860 --> 00:16:54.860
Alcohol causes the heart to beat many unnecessary times, and after the first dose, the heart is in danger of giving out,

172
00:16:54.860 --> 00:17:04.860
so that it needs something to keep it up, and therefore the person to whom the heart belongs has to take drink after drink after drink to keep his heart going.

173
00:17:04.860 --> 00:17:12.860
This is taught to every public school child in America. Alcohol turns the blood to water.

174
00:17:12.860 --> 00:17:20.860
And finally, an invalid man who never drinks liquor will get well, whereas a drinking man will surely die.

175
00:17:20.860 --> 00:17:26.860
And so, I just thought that would be kind of a funny thing, in terms of government lies.

176
00:17:26.860 --> 00:17:35.860
Another classic example of government lying is, you probably can't see this, the letters are too small.

177
00:17:35.860 --> 00:17:49.500
The oil industry in America was invented right after the Civil War.

178
00:17:49.500 --> 00:17:55.540
John D. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil Company in 1866, and as soon as he did that, the government

179
00:17:55.540 --> 00:18:01.620
began predicting that we're going to run out of oil at any minute, unless the government

180
00:18:01.620 --> 00:18:02.620
takes over.

181
00:18:02.620 --> 00:18:06.940
And so let me give you a few examples. I have a chart here that I'll read from.

182
00:18:06.940 --> 00:18:12.380
1866, the U.S. Revenue Commission said,

183
00:18:12.380 --> 00:18:15.660
synthetics will be available if oil production ends.

184
00:18:15.660 --> 00:18:19.660
So they were already, the year John D. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil,

185
00:18:19.660 --> 00:18:21.820
they were predicting the end to oil.

186
00:18:21.820 --> 00:18:25.660
In 1885, the U.S. Geological Survey said,

187
00:18:25.660 --> 00:18:28.940
there's little or no chance of finding oil in California,

188
00:18:28.940 --> 00:18:38.140
But then 8 billion barrels were pumped from that date to the present.

189
00:18:38.140 --> 00:18:45.540
Then in 1891, the Geological Survey said there's little or no chance of finding oil in Texas or Kansas.

190
00:18:45.540 --> 00:18:50.540
Now I'll move up to 1914, the U.S. Bureau of Mines.

191
00:18:50.540 --> 00:18:56.940
The total future domestic production of oil is only 5.7 billion barrels,

192
00:18:56.940 --> 00:19:02.940
But there have been sort of like 50 billion barrels, you know, since then, as opposed to that.

193
00:19:02.940 --> 00:19:09.940
Let's see, 1939, the U.S. Department of Interior said,

194
00:19:09.940 --> 00:19:13.940
U.S. oil supplies will last only 13 more years.

195
00:19:13.940 --> 00:19:20.940
And so you see, I guess you get the picture of all these crazy predictions.

196
00:19:20.940 --> 00:19:24.940
And of course, the purpose of this was always to try to make the case for a government takeover

197
00:19:24.940 --> 00:19:31.940
and the takeover of energy industries, because leaving it to the market, we're going to run out of everything, as far as that goes.

198
00:19:33.940 --> 00:19:35.940
So that's my second example.

199
00:19:37.940 --> 00:19:42.940
Another example that Bennett and I wrote about was poverty statistics.

200
00:19:43.940 --> 00:19:52.940
You know, the statistics that come out of government are kind of blinding, and some of the people at this conference have talked about statistics.

201
00:19:52.940 --> 00:19:57.860
Statistics, but in the poverty statistics there's an economist named Edgar Browning

202
00:19:57.860 --> 00:20:03.860
who gave a presidential address to the Southern Economic Association some years ago and he

203
00:20:03.860 --> 00:20:09.980
did a lot of research on the effects of the welfare states and the economics of poverty

204
00:20:09.980 --> 00:20:16.100
over the course of his career and published a lot of good articles on it and he took a

205
00:20:16.100 --> 00:20:22.660
So look at these claims that the government was making at the time that, quote, the top

206
00:20:22.660 --> 00:20:29.460
20% of income earners receive 44% of total income, as though that's a bad thing necessarily.

207
00:20:29.460 --> 00:20:34.340
I guess they're supposed to receive exactly 20% of total income.

208
00:20:34.340 --> 00:20:38.660
But when the government makes pronouncements like this and says therefore we need a more

209
00:20:38.660 --> 00:20:46.020
progressive tax system to redistribute the wealth, to quote Barack Obama, they say what

210
00:20:46.020 --> 00:20:51.540
What they do is, this is based on, at the time, is based on pre-tax income.

211
00:20:51.540 --> 00:20:56.340
So they're looking at people who make, say, $100,000 a year, but they don't subtract out

212
00:20:56.340 --> 00:21:01.260
the taxes they pay in order to exaggerate how much money they have, what their disposable

213
00:21:01.260 --> 00:21:02.260
income is.

214
00:21:02.260 --> 00:21:07.380
At the same time, they don't count any of the in-kind benefits that the welfare recipients

215
00:21:07.380 --> 00:21:08.380
got.

216
00:21:08.380 --> 00:21:12.860
And in some places, at the time Browning was writing this, in some places people were getting

217
00:21:12.860 --> 00:21:19.860
$20,000 or $30,000 a year worth of in-kind benefits, daycare allowances and that sort of thing.

218
00:21:19.860 --> 00:21:24.860
And so they intentionally skew the statistics that way.

219
00:21:24.860 --> 00:21:33.860
On farming, we had a chapter in this book on farming lies, and one of the funnier ones was the government declared,

220
00:21:33.860 --> 00:21:38.860
the government is always declaring that there are a lot more farmers than there actually are out there.

221
00:21:38.860 --> 00:21:46.860
For example, it said that there are 2.2 million farmers, but one million of these people denied that they were farmers.

222
00:21:46.860 --> 00:21:52.860
What are you talking about? I'm not a farmer. I have a garden in my backyard. I'm not a farmer.

223
00:21:52.860 --> 00:21:57.860
One of the definitions was, I think if you own any kind of livestock, like a horse,

224
00:21:57.860 --> 00:22:02.860
and I have friends who have young children and they buy them a horse and they keep the horse in a stable somewhere,

225
00:22:02.860 --> 00:22:06.860
and on weekends the girls go out and ride the horse, so they're farmers,

226
00:22:06.860 --> 00:22:19.860
Because they own livestock, and so whatever the next farm bill comes around, they want to be able to say this is going to help 2.2 million farmers, not necessarily.

227
00:22:19.860 --> 00:22:26.860
Of course, environmentalist propaganda, I could stand up here for a month repeating some of that.

228
00:22:26.860 --> 00:22:38.860
But if anybody is, one of the best researchers we had in this area is the late Julian Simon, it was a real loss for the whole freedom movement when Julian Simon passed away.

229
00:22:38.860 --> 00:22:44.860
But he was really a badger of the environmental movement and some of their claims.

230
00:22:44.860 --> 00:22:52.860
And there was a government report called the Global 2000 Report to the President that was a government funded research project

231
00:22:52.860 --> 00:23:01.860
that was supposed to look at all sorts of environmental issues and inform the President and the Congress what all the problems are.

232
00:23:01.860 --> 00:23:06.860
And Julian Simon got a hold of it and found that there was almost no data in there.

233
00:23:06.860 --> 00:23:15.860
They made all these claims about running out of resources, for example, without providing any statistics on it.

234
00:23:15.860 --> 00:23:18.860
And Simon was a crackerjack statistician.

235
00:23:18.860 --> 00:23:24.860
I'll read you some of the things he came up with, just in general.

236
00:23:24.860 --> 00:23:29.860
Life expectancy growth rate will decline, says this report to the president.

237
00:23:29.860 --> 00:23:34.860
Actually the rate, Simon says the rate is increasing at an increasing rate.

238
00:23:34.860 --> 00:23:40.860
Energy prices will increase, the long-term trend is for lower energy prices.

239
00:23:40.860 --> 00:23:43.860
Food availability will grow slowly.

240
00:23:43.860 --> 00:23:50.900
Simon says that per capita food production have been growing twice as fast as projected.

241
00:23:50.900 --> 00:23:54.460
Overpopulation is catastrophic, they said.

242
00:23:54.460 --> 00:23:56.460
And of course, Simon says, well, not necessarily.

243
00:23:56.460 --> 00:23:58.260
Look at Hong Kong.

244
00:23:58.260 --> 00:24:00.660
Why is it catastrophic there?

245
00:24:00.660 --> 00:24:05.120
It is if you don't have capitalism as your economic system, but not necessarily.

246
00:24:05.120 --> 00:24:08.980
And so he looked at every one of these claims and debunked them.

247
00:24:08.980 --> 00:24:18.380
Of course, Simon is famous for his bet with the environmental hysteric Paul Ehrlich.

248
00:24:18.380 --> 00:24:19.380
He made him a bet.

249
00:24:19.380 --> 00:24:24.880
I think the way the bet went was he said, Ehrlich, you pick any five minerals in the

250
00:24:24.880 --> 00:24:30.980
world and we'll bet an amount of money that the price of every one of those minerals will

251
00:24:30.980 --> 00:24:37.660
be lower 10 years from now than it is, betting that they will become more abundant in supply

252
00:24:37.660 --> 00:24:43.060
and the Increased Supply will drop the price, and Ehrlich won the bet, and then he asked,

253
00:24:43.060 --> 00:24:48.980
not Ehrlich, Simon did, our guy won the bet, and then he asked Paul Ehrlich if he would

254
00:24:48.980 --> 00:24:53.340
like to double the money and bet again, and he turned him down.

255
00:24:53.340 --> 00:24:58.620
But Paul Ehrlich is a celebrated entomologist, he's trained in entomology, but he's one

256
00:24:58.620 --> 00:25:04.540
of the authors of several famous books, The Limits to Growth was one of his, and it was

257
00:25:04.540 --> 00:25:09.020
was all thoroughly debunked when it came out, and he keeps writing the same book essentially

258
00:25:09.020 --> 00:25:13.720
about every 10 years, claiming the whole world is going to hell environmentally.

259
00:25:13.720 --> 00:25:19.700
I think he predicted there would be 25 million people left in America by 2000 in the 1960s,

260
00:25:19.700 --> 00:25:23.980
but he's still, you know, endowed chair holder at Stanford the last time I looked him up

261
00:25:23.980 --> 00:25:26.780
and that sort of thing.

262
00:25:26.780 --> 00:25:34.420
A few more examples of government lying that are worth mentioning here by the time I have.

263
00:25:34.420 --> 00:25:39.220
Here's a good one. This is on the war on drugs.

264
00:25:39.220 --> 00:25:46.920
This is from a government ad in the early days of the war on drugs.

265
00:25:46.920 --> 00:25:53.920
Marijuana causes insanity. It incites its users to rape.

266
00:25:53.920 --> 00:26:00.720
Those who indulge in its habitual use eventually develop a delirious rage after its administration,

267
00:26:00.720 --> 00:26:08.320
During which time they are temporarily at least irresponsible and prone to commit violent crimes.

268
00:26:08.320 --> 00:26:14.320
I went to school at a time when half of the student population were potheads,

269
00:26:14.320 --> 00:26:20.320
and they were the least violent people you would ever want to see.

270
00:26:20.320 --> 00:26:27.920
I never knew a violent pothead. It was the beer drinkers who were the rowdy, violent ones.

271
00:26:27.920 --> 00:26:35.920
And this is a drug administration commissioner, I guess they call him commissioner, in the early days of the war on drugs.

272
00:26:35.920 --> 00:26:41.920
He's talking about opium and marijuana. He says, but here we have a drug that is not like opium.

273
00:26:41.920 --> 00:26:46.920
Opium has all the good of Dr. Jekyll and all the evil of Mr. Hyde.

274
00:26:46.920 --> 00:26:50.920
This drug, marijuana, is entirely the monster Hyde.

275
00:26:50.920 --> 00:26:55.920
So that's the sort of thing we got from the war on drugs.

276
00:26:55.920 --> 00:27:25.920
And then a final thing that's related to the war on drugs, you know the government publishes all sorts of reports on how good a job it's doing on the war on drugs and I always get kind of a chuckle out of this because it claims to know with great precision down to the decimal points of the decline in drug use that's out there and you've got to wonder how do they know how much illegal heroin use is going on out there.

277
00:27:25.920 --> 00:27:35.920
There's one announcement, we have reduced adolescent drug use by 10%.

278
00:27:35.920 --> 00:27:38.080
How would they know that?

279
00:27:38.080 --> 00:27:45.840
We reduced adolescent cocaine use by 20% from 1988 to 1999, and so, again, how would they

280
00:27:45.840 --> 00:27:46.840
know that?

281
00:27:46.840 --> 00:27:53.560
So they give these exact percentages, which is really kind of crazy as far as that goes.

282
00:27:53.560 --> 00:27:59.920
And yeah, that was the best one I had here.

283
00:27:59.920 --> 00:28:05.000
There's another ad that the government put on TV about drugs, about teenagers, and said

284
00:28:05.000 --> 00:28:12.600
something like, if your teenager is feeling lazy, grades are lower, they're depressed,

285
00:28:12.600 --> 00:28:17.060
then they're on drugs, and you better do something about it, so teenagers never get depressed

286
00:28:17.060 --> 00:28:22.380
over losing a girlfriend, or get lazy, don't want to do their homework, but that's the

287
00:28:22.380 --> 00:28:41.380
And so I think what I'll conclude with here is another quote from Schumpeter, Joseph Schumpeter, on the whole racket of government propaganda and lying, where he said, politicians are able to fashion and within very wide limits even to create the will of the people.

288
00:28:41.380 --> 00:28:42.380
People.

289
00:28:42.380 --> 00:28:47.380
What we are confronted with in the analysis of political processes is largely not a genuine

290
00:28:47.380 --> 00:28:49.440
but a manufactured will.

291
00:28:49.440 --> 00:28:53.660
So far as this is so, the will of the people is the product and not the motive power of

292
00:28:53.660 --> 00:28:55.340
the political process.

293
00:28:55.340 --> 00:29:00.980
The ways in which issues and the popular will on any issue are being manufactured is exactly

294
00:29:00.980 --> 00:29:04.120
analogous to the ways of commercial advertising.

295
00:29:04.120 --> 00:29:07.140
We find the same attempts to contact the subconscious.

296
00:29:07.140 --> 00:29:11.900
We find the same technique of creating favorable and unfavorable associations which are more

297
00:29:11.900 --> 00:29:14.420
effective the less rational they are.

298
00:29:14.420 --> 00:29:20.060
We find the same evasions, the same trick of producing opinion by reiterated assertion

299
00:29:20.060 --> 00:29:25.020
that is successful precisely to the extent to which it avoids rational argument and the

300
00:29:25.020 --> 00:29:29.180
danger of awakening the critical faculties of the people.

301
00:29:29.180 --> 00:29:32.380
That's the last thing the government wants to do is to awaken the critical faculties

302
00:29:32.380 --> 00:29:33.380
of the people.

303
00:29:33.380 --> 00:29:36.380
After all, that's what a public school is for, isn't it?

304
00:29:36.380 --> 00:29:38.740
To put those faculties asleep?

305
00:29:38.740 --> 00:29:41.260
And of course, that is probably the biggest sin

306
00:29:41.260 --> 00:29:43.380
of government lies and propaganda

307
00:29:43.380 --> 00:29:45.300
is running the public school system

308
00:29:45.300 --> 00:29:48.780
because that's where the lies and propaganda come from.

309
00:29:48.780 --> 00:29:50.060
Where else would everyone learn

310
00:29:50.060 --> 00:29:52.900
that Abe Lincoln was a great humanitarian, for example?

311
00:29:52.900 --> 00:29:55.140
And that's about all I have time for.

312
00:29:55.980 --> 00:29:57.980
Thank you very much.