WEBVTT

NOTE How This Recession Has Battered Mainstream Economists: An Austrian Opportunity

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:15.000
It was relatively late in my career, probably only ten years ago, that I discovered a physiological truth.

2
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:20.000
I've never seen it violated and I believe it is biologically built into the human race.

3
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:28.000
That is, you will never see a lecturer yawn during his speech.

4
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:35.500
And yet an extraordinary thing takes place that in the group this size there will always be at least one person who can't stop.

5
00:00:35.500 --> 00:00:42.500
So what I'm going to do today is attempt as best I can to keep as few of you yawning as possible

6
00:00:42.500 --> 00:00:53.500
and take you through what I think is truly an opportunity, unique opportunity, that lies ahead of us.

7
00:00:53.500 --> 00:01:07.500
We have heard from Dr. Murphy about the extent of the transformation of the banking system that has taken place just in the last two years.

8
00:01:07.500 --> 00:01:18.500
Unprecedented change that has taken place even in wartime was not on a scale that this most recent change has been.

9
00:01:18.500 --> 00:01:39.500
We've now heard from Mr. Denson about the effect of the terrible crash, boom and crash, of the 1720 era, both in France and in Great Britain, and it shaped both countries.

10
00:01:39.500 --> 00:01:56.500
The reaction shaped both nations, and surely did shape this nation, in the hostility that took place, a wave of hostility that took place against that destruction of capital.

11
00:01:56.500 --> 00:02:01.500
Destruction of capital is not a pleasant topic.

12
00:02:01.500 --> 00:02:14.500
And you can hedge yourself to some limited degree, safer place, gold and silver, all the traditional focuses of people's concern.

13
00:02:14.500 --> 00:02:22.500
You get very concerned about how to protect myself, but in the breakdown of the division of labor, there is no safety.

14
00:02:22.500 --> 00:02:29.500
And in a complete breakdown, that is the total breakdown of the monetary system, should that happen, you're really calling into question

15
00:02:29.500 --> 00:02:59.500
question the ability of some large cities even to survive because if they can't deliver trucks with food into the major cities for as little a period as a week or two weeks you have crisis because there must be constant replenishing of the food and other things that we're completely dependent upon

16
00:02:59.500 --> 00:03:10.500
And if the money system breaks down, how do you gain the cooperation of the suppliers of the cities?

17
00:03:10.500 --> 00:03:13.500
Now, I think the Federal Reserve is aware of this.

18
00:03:13.500 --> 00:03:20.500
And I think the Federal Reserve is aware of the threat that a real breakdown would cause.

19
00:03:20.500 --> 00:03:22.500
And I hope they are aware of it.

20
00:03:22.500 --> 00:03:27.500
And I hope at some point they will finally put on the brakes.

21
00:03:27.500 --> 00:03:36.500
They have not yet, but they will put on the brakes, because if they don't, then you're talking about a catastrophe.

22
00:03:36.500 --> 00:03:43.500
But in any case, what we are seeing now is unprecedented in terms of what the Federal Reserve has done.

23
00:03:43.500 --> 00:03:49.500
In a period of one month, it doubled the monetary base, just exactly two years ago.

24
00:03:49.500 --> 00:03:51.500
One month!

25
00:03:51.500 --> 00:03:55.500
Now that was not Keynesian policy.

26
00:03:55.500 --> 00:04:03.000
There's nothing in canes that you can find that would justify a doubling of the monetary base in less than a month.

27
00:04:03.000 --> 00:04:10.500
That was do something fast, anything fast, it's going down.

28
00:04:10.500 --> 00:04:21.000
This was a last gasp measure, coupled with the bailout provided by the Congress.

29
00:04:21.000 --> 00:04:28.000
Unprecedented amounts of money were thrown almost randomly into the system.

30
00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:40.000
This was not any kind of traditional Keynesian, Chicagoan, rational expectations,

31
00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:48.000
any school of thought that existed exactly two years ago this week, really.

32
00:04:48.000 --> 00:05:04.000
There was no school of thought that would, two months before, have justified in terms of its own theory what the Federal Reserve and the United States Treasury did between September and the end of October of 2008.

33
00:05:04.000 --> 00:05:15.000
There was no plan. There was no organized body of opinion within Western economies which would have justified those actions.

34
00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:26.000
And yet in retrospect what we are seeing is that it has been justified in terms of Keynes and his theories.

35
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:40.000
The Keynesians are taking whatever credit has been taken for what they say was the bailout and salvation of the financial system.

36
00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:42.000
They're taking full credit for it.

37
00:05:42.000 --> 00:06:12.000
Remember, what we have seen in the past 24 months, I have never seen as an adult, and that is an almost complete abandonment of all other schools of thought in deference to the Keynesians because no school of thought had any justification in terms of theory to justify what the Federal Reserve and the Treasury did and only by really stretching

38
00:06:12.000 --> 00:06:23.400
System. Could you justify it? And so we have seen, unfortunately, an almost total

39
00:06:23.400 --> 00:06:29.600
capitulation within the academic community, within the financial community,

40
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:37.780
a capitulation to the Keynesian worldview. And the Keynesian worldview can be

41
00:06:37.780 --> 00:06:50.980
be summarized in four words. Federal deficits overcome recessions. That's it. And the defenders

42
00:06:50.980 --> 00:06:58.260
can't do much better than that. Of course, you can add two words. Big federal deficits

43
00:06:58.260 --> 00:07:07.340
overcome huge recessions. And that's the one we're in now. All they have done since 1936

44
00:07:07.340 --> 00:07:21.340
is to add two words to the four-part syllogism. Federal deficits overcome recessions. That's it. That's what we're up against. Four very simple words.

45
00:07:21.340 --> 00:07:31.340
Now, I'm in marketing. I've been in marketing a long time. That's called a unique selling proposition, the famous USP.

46
00:07:31.340 --> 00:07:41.340
And you'd better have a USP for your business, your career, whatever it is you're trying to promote. You need a USP.

47
00:07:41.340 --> 00:07:51.340
After almost half a century, within the last couple of years, Walmart came up with its USP.

48
00:07:51.340 --> 00:07:57.340
That one is lower prices live better.

49
00:07:57.340 --> 00:08:03.840
Tremendous. Brilliant. They probably paid a lot of money for that one. Worth every penny.

50
00:08:03.840 --> 00:08:10.840
And the variation may be save money, live better. But you get the idea. Four words. Four powerful words.

51
00:08:10.840 --> 00:08:22.840
And to those four words of the Keynesian system, the entire academic community collapsed.

52
00:08:22.840 --> 00:08:28.840
Save one group, us.

53
00:08:28.840 --> 00:08:34.840
We did not because we never accepted the premise.

54
00:08:34.840 --> 00:08:46.840
Now I have a proposed USP that I think is saleable, marketable, gripping, can be converted into support.

55
00:08:46.840 --> 00:08:56.840
Our four words are, Tax, Cuts, Increase, Liberty. That's our.

56
00:09:00.840 --> 00:09:11.840
And I believe that over the next 15 to 20 years, the fate, economically speaking, of our civilization

57
00:09:11.840 --> 00:09:20.840
is literally going to be between those separate, totally rival, four-word USPs.

58
00:09:23.840 --> 00:09:35.840
Why do I think this is coming? Because we have been told in those four words that federal deficits overcome recessions.

59
00:09:35.840 --> 00:09:48.840
We've been told that by the Keynesians since 1936, and it has been believed widely one way or another ever since.

60
00:09:48.840 --> 00:09:57.840
For a brief period in the 1970s, because Keynesian policies did not overcome the recessions,

61
00:09:57.840 --> 00:10:03.840
and because we began to have serious price inflation during the 1970s,

62
00:10:03.840 --> 00:10:17.840
In the 1970s, there was a period of time in which the Chicago School of Economics gained traction with other scholars and even with the financial community.

63
00:10:17.840 --> 00:10:30.840
And they continued to say that the key factor is the money supply and that it was out of control, which indeed it was,

64
00:10:30.840 --> 00:10:47.840
That if the Federal Reserve could just be brought to obey a basic rule of not allowing the money supply to increase more than, and there was always the debate of the figures, but the standard figures were between 2% and 5% per annum.

65
00:10:47.840 --> 00:10:59.840
If the Federal Reserve would just stick to a monetary policy that was predictable, and simultaneously if the federal government would begin to reduce taxes and reduce regulation,

66
00:10:59.840 --> 00:11:06.080
We would not need to have booms and busts.

67
00:11:06.080 --> 00:11:08.760
Now that goes back a long way.

68
00:11:08.760 --> 00:11:14.840
That Chicago idea goes back certainly to the turn of the century.

69
00:11:14.840 --> 00:11:21.380
It goes back to even before the time of Milton Friedman and the growth of the famous Chicago

70
00:11:21.380 --> 00:11:22.440
School of Economists.

71
00:11:22.440 --> 00:11:28.360
There was a free market tradition that did understand that you cut back on regulation,

72
00:11:28.360 --> 00:11:32.880
You need a stable money supply.

73
00:11:32.880 --> 00:11:41.000
And certainly in that tradition, going back really to the time of Mises' first book on

74
00:11:41.000 --> 00:11:45.720
The Theory of Money and Credit, you had defenders saying, well, you could do this actually without

75
00:11:45.720 --> 00:11:48.160
gold and silver.

76
00:11:48.160 --> 00:11:50.960
That was the position.

77
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:55.100
And the great promoter of that was a man named Irving Fischer.

78
00:11:55.100 --> 00:12:02.100
And you can find in 1911, that was his position, and you can find in The Theory of Money and Credit, a response by Mises.

79
00:12:02.100 --> 00:12:15.100
He immediately saw the threat to the idea that the government can have safe control over the money supply, and that you could trust the government to do it.

80
00:12:15.100 --> 00:12:22.100
And so, of course, he was in favor of contractual relationships and gold and silver coins, a gold coin standard.

81
00:12:22.100 --> 00:12:51.100
So Mises saw almost immediately, literally within months, that Fisher was promoting a concept that was intolerable in terms of the defense of liberty because Fisher was ultimately promoting a concept of money and banking which would be run by brilliant economists with statistical techniques completely in the hands of the government without any connection to gold or silver.

82
00:12:52.100 --> 00:12:59.100
and a war began, an intellectual war began in 1912 with the publication of Mises' Theory of Money and Credit

83
00:13:00.440 --> 00:13:01.780
and that war

84
00:13:01.780 --> 00:13:03.140
extended

85
00:13:03.140 --> 00:13:05.260
all the way through

86
00:13:05.260 --> 00:13:10.780
the twenties, the thirties, all the way through the seventies and eighties

87
00:13:10.780 --> 00:13:15.020
and it was always the Austrian school following Mises saying you cannot trust

88
00:13:15.020 --> 00:13:19.860
the government, you cannot trust the central bank, you can trust contractual

89
00:13:19.860 --> 00:13:21.820
relationships

90
00:13:21.820 --> 00:13:27.820
If those relationships lead to the gold standard, which we think it will, you must put your

91
00:13:27.820 --> 00:13:35.060
trust in markets and contracts and not in brilliant economists and statisticians and

92
00:13:35.060 --> 00:13:36.940
central bankers.

93
00:13:36.940 --> 00:13:37.940
That was the position.

94
00:13:37.940 --> 00:13:41.660
That has always been the position for almost a hundred years.

95
00:13:41.660 --> 00:13:48.660
That has been the position since 1912.

96
00:13:48.660 --> 00:14:02.000
I believe that over the last 24 months, Irving Fisher's physician has died in operation.

97
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:09.460
Because we have seen the extent to which we dare not trust the Federal Reserve, the statisticians,

98
00:14:09.460 --> 00:14:18.120
the government planners, all those who would pull authority under their administration

99
00:14:18.120 --> 00:14:24.200
for the Benefit of the Public, because when push came to shove, it was throw money at

100
00:14:24.200 --> 00:14:29.200
the problem, we got no theory to solve it, just write the checks.

101
00:14:29.200 --> 00:14:30.480
That's all it was.

102
00:14:30.480 --> 00:14:32.480
There was no theory.

103
00:14:32.480 --> 00:14:34.160
The theory's gone.

104
00:14:34.160 --> 00:14:40.160
There was only ad hocery on trillion dollar sizes.

105
00:14:40.160 --> 00:14:46.720
Ad hocery of $700 billion, bam, one shot.

106
00:14:46.720 --> 00:14:54.720
A trillion plus dollars in one month that the Federal Reserve pumped into the system.

107
00:14:54.720 --> 00:14:55.720
That's ad hocery.

108
00:14:55.720 --> 00:14:59.000
That's the denial of economics.

109
00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:09.720
That is only one thing that I can see, a valued attempt to support, four words, federal deficits

110
00:15:09.720 --> 00:15:14.000
overcome recession.

111
00:15:14.000 --> 00:15:21.480
and they gave us a deficit that was horrendous and they are going to continue to do it.

112
00:15:21.480 --> 00:15:25.260
The lowball estimates are a trillion dollars a year between now and 2020.

113
00:15:25.260 --> 00:15:28.980
Those are the lowball estimates and remember that doesn't count the Social Security and

114
00:15:28.980 --> 00:15:31.260
Medicare obligations.

115
00:15:31.260 --> 00:15:38.280
That's just the run of the mill on budget, admitted deficits, a trillion dollars a year

116
00:15:38.280 --> 00:15:41.580
for the next decade and after that they don't tell us.

117
00:15:41.580 --> 00:15:45.740
And they quit making the predictions after 2020.

118
00:15:45.740 --> 00:15:51.860
I dare say it will not go from a trillion dollars deficit in fiscal year 2020 down to

119
00:15:51.860 --> 00:15:55.540
say no deficit whatsoever in 2021.

120
00:15:55.540 --> 00:16:00.140
I think that's a fairly safe bet.

121
00:16:00.140 --> 00:16:10.900
So what we have seen in the last 24 months is the complete and utter routing of all opponents

122
00:16:10.900 --> 00:16:16.300
to the Keynesian system within the financial community, the political community and I think

123
00:16:16.300 --> 00:16:23.340
even the theoretical community because there's no way to justify what was done other than

124
00:16:23.340 --> 00:16:28.200
to say massive ad hocery, we didn't know what we were doing, we tried anything we could

125
00:16:28.200 --> 00:16:36.340
and apparently the thing hasn't completely collapsed, therefore let's have more deficits

126
00:16:36.340 --> 00:16:41.140
And if necessary, a whole lot more quantitative easing.

127
00:16:41.140 --> 00:16:43.820
She's quantitative easing.

128
00:16:43.820 --> 00:16:48.860
You know, in my mind, as I said earlier this week, the image that comes is an enormous

129
00:16:48.860 --> 00:16:50.900
problem of diarrhea.

130
00:16:50.900 --> 00:16:58.420
That's quantitative easing.

131
00:16:58.420 --> 00:17:04.420
Over 50 years ago, Senator Wallace Bennett, who was a really good senator, was at a conference

132
00:17:04.420 --> 00:17:07.600
It's not different from this, but with a lot of really first-rate people.

133
00:17:07.600 --> 00:17:08.600
Mises was there.

134
00:17:08.600 --> 00:17:09.740
I think Hayek was there.

135
00:17:09.740 --> 00:17:10.940
I think Friedman was there.

136
00:17:10.940 --> 00:17:13.540
They brought in the big guys.

137
00:17:13.540 --> 00:17:20.060
Bennett came in and they were talking about monetary theory and price controls.

138
00:17:20.060 --> 00:17:24.820
And Bennett said this, he said, I mean, he's in with these scholars.

139
00:17:24.820 --> 00:17:28.820
These are the best free market economists in the world.

140
00:17:28.820 --> 00:17:36.960
And he said, well, I was driving with one of my tours on the voting trail recently and

141
00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:41.380
I stopped in a gas station.

142
00:17:41.380 --> 00:17:51.020
This was early 50s, during the Korean War, and there were price controls on a lot of

143
00:17:51.020 --> 00:17:54.660
goods because of the war.

144
00:17:54.660 --> 00:18:00.760
And he said, I got to talking with one of the gas station attendants.

145
00:18:00.760 --> 00:18:04.300
And we came up, what about inflation?

146
00:18:04.300 --> 00:18:05.620
What about price controls?

147
00:18:05.620 --> 00:18:10.480
He said, well, the attendant looked over to me and he said, the way I look at it is to

148
00:18:10.480 --> 00:18:19.740
understand price controls, it's like adhesive tape for the diarrhea problem.

149
00:18:19.740 --> 00:18:20.740
And I thought about that.

150
00:18:20.740 --> 00:18:27.540
I read this thing probably 20 years after he said it, and I don't think it's ever been described any better.

151
00:18:27.540 --> 00:18:36.140
I think that gas station attendant had made a breakthrough conceptually that really dwarfed the economists.

152
00:18:36.140 --> 00:18:41.040
So quantitative easing, yes, we're going to get it, and then we're going to get the adhesive tape.

153
00:18:41.040 --> 00:18:45.340
You can count on that too, and the results will be comparable.

154
00:18:45.340 --> 00:18:57.340
We are dealing with people at the highest levels who cannot think conceptually much beyond adhesive tape for the quantitative easing.

155
00:18:57.340 --> 00:19:07.340
And when that happens, then you get the real crises, the shortages that you cannot get the goods you need at the time that you need them.

156
00:19:07.340 --> 00:19:15.220
And then the hoarding begins, because you want to be able to get the goods you need when you need them.

157
00:19:15.220 --> 00:19:19.140
and if the monetary system and the price system is being controlled by the

158
00:19:19.140 --> 00:19:21.500
government

159
00:19:21.500 --> 00:19:26.660
then you must find alternative ways of supply.

160
00:19:26.660 --> 00:19:29.520
We are facing, I believe,

161
00:19:29.520 --> 00:19:31.880
a time in which

162
00:19:31.880 --> 00:19:35.460
it will be clear to large numbers of people

163
00:19:35.460 --> 00:19:39.340
all around the world

164
00:19:39.340 --> 00:19:43.640
that the solution to the problem is not massive deficits

165
00:19:43.640 --> 00:19:49.120
and Massive Increases of the Money Supply. They may not know what the solution is, and

166
00:19:49.120 --> 00:19:54.760
I think that is our problem. They do not know what the solution is, and they do not trust

167
00:19:54.760 --> 00:20:01.760
our position, which is tax cuts increase liberty. They don't understand that. But I'll tell

168
00:20:02.760 --> 00:20:09.600
you one thing, there are more voters who understand it than congressmen who understand it. And

169
00:20:09.600 --> 00:20:13.040
That's the hope that we have.

170
00:20:13.040 --> 00:20:20.280
And William Buckley's old line, done for a laugh, was accurate.

171
00:20:20.280 --> 00:20:25.020
All those years ago, where he said, I would rather be governed by the first 200 names

172
00:20:25.020 --> 00:20:35.280
of the Boston telephone directory than by the faculty of Harvard.

173
00:20:35.280 --> 00:20:44.360
We are beginning to see with the Tea Party Movement a sense of outrage in which little

174
00:20:44.360 --> 00:20:53.480
people without academic credentials, little people who do not have positions of power

175
00:20:53.480 --> 00:20:59.160
are coming to the town hall meetings and fighting.

176
00:20:59.160 --> 00:21:05.240
And I remember one of those meetings and remember with the joy, the magnificent joy of you two

177
00:21:05.240 --> 00:21:14.560
YouTube and people with camera phones, it all gets out there within 24 hours or less.

178
00:21:14.560 --> 00:21:24.880
One female senator saying, you people don't believe me, to which the crowd said, no.

179
00:21:24.880 --> 00:21:26.560
They can't understand what's happening.

180
00:21:26.560 --> 00:21:32.080
They are dealing with something they have never dealt with before.

181
00:21:32.080 --> 00:21:38.640
They are dealing with people who are beginning to catch on that the guys in charge do not

182
00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:45.640
know what they're doing and that they're going to extract wealth from the public on a massive

183
00:21:45.680 --> 00:21:51.240
scale and people are beginning to sense it. Now this country is divided and the world

184
00:21:51.240 --> 00:21:56.520
is divided. You have, in Great Britain today, you have a government that does not have a

185
00:21:56.520 --> 00:22:01.960
majority. You've got two parties really philosophically opposed to each other who are governing that

186
00:22:01.960 --> 00:22:07.720
History. You have exactly the same thing going on now in Australia. They don't have a majority

187
00:22:07.720 --> 00:22:12.620
government in Australia. There is enormous division. Now, we've lived through something.

188
00:22:12.620 --> 00:22:18.480
You probably have never looked at this, but I'm an historian by training. We had something

189
00:22:18.480 --> 00:22:24.560
that this country has never had before in its history. That is, we had back-to-back

190
00:22:24.560 --> 00:22:30.560
two-year presidents or two-term presidents of rival parties

191
00:22:30.560 --> 00:22:36.220
two terms of Clinton, two terms of Bush, that's never happened before in American history, always

192
00:22:36.220 --> 00:22:43.220
you can get a two-termer, but the guy who replaces him will not get two terms

193
00:22:43.220 --> 00:22:46.660
but this country is divided

194
00:22:46.660 --> 00:22:50.600
and divided in a way that I would not have imagined

195
00:22:50.600 --> 00:22:53.360
there is no agreement on what should be done

196
00:22:53.360 --> 00:23:02.360
and in this deadlock which I believe will become gridlock shortly, now you have an opportunity

197
00:23:02.360 --> 00:23:09.080
for the public generally to begin to sort through which direction we are going to go

198
00:23:09.080 --> 00:23:18.760
in because the political parties are divided and if the Democrats lose a lot of seats there

199
00:23:18.760 --> 00:23:26.560
There will be fear, finally, in the halls of Congress, because they are afraid of losing.

200
00:23:26.560 --> 00:23:31.400
Now this does us no good if people don't understand fundamental principles and why those principles

201
00:23:31.400 --> 00:23:32.400
are true.

202
00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:38.520
This is why the educational role of an organization like the Mises Institute is so important.

203
00:23:38.520 --> 00:23:44.960
Making noise, getting angry, is not a solution.

204
00:23:44.960 --> 00:23:54.200
Because we need to have a society of men and women, not who can read human action, but

205
00:23:54.200 --> 00:24:04.320
who can understand a fundamental principle such as tax, cuts, increase, liberty.

206
00:24:04.320 --> 00:24:08.880
They can understand that.

207
00:24:08.880 --> 00:24:23.040
Now there's another slogan that is close behind, which is, tax increases, increase pain.

208
00:24:23.040 --> 00:24:24.520
That's easy to understand.

209
00:24:24.520 --> 00:24:27.440
Tax increases, increase pain.

210
00:24:27.440 --> 00:24:36.120
And people are going to be in great pain as this thing plays out, enormous pain.

211
00:24:36.120 --> 00:24:44.280
And our goal in this environment is to persuade people that there is a reason why they are in pain.

212
00:24:44.280 --> 00:24:52.220
And the reason they are in pain is that at the very top levels of every single nation,

213
00:24:52.220 --> 00:25:03.060
there is the adoption of the Keynesian belief, which is federal deficits overcome recession.

214
00:25:03.060 --> 00:25:07.900
And now we have to fight this thing out in very simple terms.

215
00:25:07.900 --> 00:25:13.140
Because pain will be increasing and there will be a search for scapegoats.

216
00:25:13.140 --> 00:25:17.280
And the advantage that we have today is this.

217
00:25:17.280 --> 00:25:28.500
We have been on the fringes for so long that we didn't do it.

218
00:25:28.500 --> 00:25:37.600
And yet, as fringe people, you're beginning to hear words like, incredibly, the Austrian

219
00:25:37.600 --> 00:25:39.300
Theory of the Trade Cycle.

220
00:25:39.300 --> 00:25:46.620
You're beginning to hear that kind of language filtering into the ranks of educated people.

221
00:25:46.620 --> 00:25:51.460
So we're on the fringes, outside the normal realm of discourse.

222
00:25:51.460 --> 00:25:56.480
Prior to two years ago, we were outside the normal terms of discourse.

223
00:25:56.480 --> 00:26:02.200
And yet because of the crisis that has taken place at the highest levels and not just in

224
00:26:02.200 --> 00:26:11.120
this country but around the world and almost simultaneously, great doubts are now widespread.

225
00:26:11.120 --> 00:26:13.880
Doubts on how did it happen?

226
00:26:13.880 --> 00:26:20.200
The old line is if you're so smart, how come we're busted?

227
00:26:20.200 --> 00:26:24.000
And that's a legitimate question.

228
00:26:24.000 --> 00:26:27.880
Now this is not a new event.

229
00:26:27.880 --> 00:26:32.960
People change their minds, cultures change their minds, and they do it over a period

230
00:26:32.960 --> 00:26:37.440
of time where doubt builds up and then very fast there's a change.

231
00:26:37.440 --> 00:26:43.000
We've already heard one of those stories, doubts which were raised in 1720 in Cato's

232
00:26:43.000 --> 00:26:50.840
letters that did not come to fruition for a full generation, did not come to fruition

233
00:26:50.840 --> 00:26:57.840
until the aftermath of what was known as the Stamp Act crisis.

234
00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:04.400
Now if you know about it, people don't read it, it was in 1765, it was the first great

235
00:27:04.400 --> 00:27:10.620
tax protest of the United States. And the British government passed, that in the history

236
00:27:10.620 --> 00:27:14.800
of all taxation was the stupidest tax that had ever been passed, ever. And you never

237
00:27:14.800 --> 00:27:20.320
see this in the textbooks, but I figured it out real early, reading the Stamp Act crisis.

238
00:27:20.320 --> 00:27:27.060
They taxed two groups, lawyers and newspapermen.

239
00:27:27.060 --> 00:27:32.620
And there was hell to pay.

240
00:27:32.620 --> 00:27:37.160
The guys who could write and the guys who could litigate got together to say it is in

241
00:27:37.160 --> 00:27:41.820
our self-interest to roll back this particular tax and they did.

242
00:27:41.820 --> 00:27:46.920
They did roll it back and that of course as you know led within eight years to the beginning

243
00:27:46.920 --> 00:27:53.920
of the American Revolution. That took a generation of rethinking the Cato's letters to the beginning

244
00:27:58.080 --> 00:28:05.080
of the Stamp Act crisis. That's 45 years. Mises began his career in 1912, and he was

245
00:28:05.080 --> 00:28:18.080
Mises began his career in 1912, and he was an obscure man at the time, and he was recognized as a bright man, a cogent economist.

246
00:28:18.080 --> 00:28:23.080
You couldn't miss that. But what happened to Mises?

247
00:28:23.080 --> 00:28:30.080
Two years later, World War I broke out, and every country in Europe suspended gold payment

248
00:28:30.080 --> 00:28:37.080
precisely because every country in Europe knew that they would have to print money as never before to fund the war

249
00:28:37.080 --> 00:28:40.080
and all of a sudden Mises looked like a prophet

250
00:28:40.080 --> 00:28:42.080
because he was

251
00:28:42.080 --> 00:28:46.080
and he said what would happen if they destroyed the gold standard and it did happen

252
00:28:46.080 --> 00:28:52.080
and it happened with a vengeance in Europe and then of course the terrible inflations of the post-war period

253
00:28:52.080 --> 00:28:55.080
in Germany, Austria and Hungary

254
00:28:55.080 --> 00:29:05.080
totally devastating mass inflations, hyperinflations, and Mises looked like a prophet, and then in 1920 he writes that little essay

255
00:29:05.080 --> 00:29:11.080
on the economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. Well, look at what he was facing.

256
00:29:11.080 --> 00:29:19.080
The Soviet Union had come into existence in 1917. You had, in the post-war period after World War I,

257
00:29:19.080 --> 00:29:27.800
4.1, you had Bavarian and other revolutionary groups, Marxist revolutionary groups appearing

258
00:29:27.800 --> 00:29:32.800
armed. Now they were put down, but it looked as though revolution was spreading. And here

259
00:29:32.800 --> 00:29:39.800
is Mises for the first time with a cogent, clear, easy to understand argument that says

260
00:29:39.800 --> 00:29:47.800
socialist economic calculation is blind and it is irrational and it cannot survive. He

261
00:29:47.800 --> 00:29:52.680
is in the right place at the right crisis.

262
00:29:52.680 --> 00:30:00.720
What happened was that in the 30s, because of government policies, very much like our

263
00:30:00.720 --> 00:30:06.240
policies today, the depression got worse and worse and worse.

264
00:30:06.240 --> 00:30:17.240
In reaction against that, the world of academia, the world of policymakers looked for an answer.

265
00:30:17.240 --> 00:30:47.240
Mises had attracted brilliant men, Hayek was one, Repke was one, Oscar Morgenstern was another, you had Gottfried Habeler, you had Fritz Machlup, these were brilliant men, and Lionel Robbins, from Great Britain, and then as the Depression wore on, and on, and on, some began to defect, and began to abandon the position, Robbins wrote one of the finest books on the Depression

266
00:30:47.240 --> 00:30:51.200
And maybe the finest book on the Depression, just called The Great Depression, Mises Institute

267
00:30:51.200 --> 00:30:52.200
has reprinted it.

268
00:30:52.200 --> 00:30:57.480
Magnificent book, 1934, in his old age, not even his old age, before the end of the decade

269
00:30:57.480 --> 00:30:58.480
he repudiated the book.

270
00:30:58.480 --> 00:31:04.120
He said, I wish I'd never published it, never written it.

271
00:31:04.120 --> 00:31:05.120
That was 1934.

272
00:31:05.120 --> 00:31:11.040
By 1936, Keynes and the General Theory came into print.

273
00:31:11.040 --> 00:31:12.660
What did Keynes do?

274
00:31:12.660 --> 00:31:19.940
He justified what every government had been doing since 1930.

275
00:31:19.940 --> 00:31:23.660
And what had every government been doing?

276
00:31:23.660 --> 00:31:28.480
Federal deficits overcome recession.

277
00:31:28.480 --> 00:31:29.620
They were all doing it.

278
00:31:29.620 --> 00:31:30.860
They were all printing money.

279
00:31:30.860 --> 00:31:32.500
They were all imposing controls.

280
00:31:32.500 --> 00:31:34.660
They were all running massive deficits.

281
00:31:34.660 --> 00:31:36.420
There was no justification for it.

282
00:31:36.420 --> 00:31:40.420
None of classical economic theory justified any of it.

283
00:31:40.420 --> 00:31:49.860
And Keynes, looking over his shoulder, five years into this mess, sits down at the typewriter

284
00:31:49.860 --> 00:31:55.440
and cranks out the general theory.

285
00:31:55.440 --> 00:32:01.620
I think every economics student should be forced to read it.

286
00:32:01.620 --> 00:32:06.540
All of them, as a rite of passage.

287
00:32:06.540 --> 00:32:11.220
If you can haze a kid to join a fraternity, you can make economists read The General Theory.

288
00:32:11.220 --> 00:32:14.020
That's my theory.

289
00:32:14.020 --> 00:32:17.820
Incoherent.

290
00:32:17.820 --> 00:32:20.540
And you say, well, a lot of economists are incoherent.

291
00:32:20.540 --> 00:32:21.540
That's true.

292
00:32:21.540 --> 00:32:23.420
But Keynes wasn't.

293
00:32:23.420 --> 00:32:27.780
Because Keynes is the author of some of the clearest and most powerful writing ever.

294
00:32:27.780 --> 00:32:30.220
His essays in biography are magnificent.

295
00:32:30.220 --> 00:32:32.140
They really are.

296
00:32:32.140 --> 00:32:40.060
His economic consequences of the peace made him reputation in 1919, clear, straightforward.

297
00:32:40.060 --> 00:32:41.940
You could understand exactly what he was doing.

298
00:32:41.940 --> 00:32:48.540
You get to the general theory in 36 and you say, what is he saying?

299
00:32:48.540 --> 00:32:51.140
You know what he's saying?

300
00:32:51.140 --> 00:32:54.020
Federal deficits overcome depression.

301
00:32:54.020 --> 00:32:55.020
That's what he's saying.

302
00:32:55.020 --> 00:33:05.520
Only he did it with garbled language, shifting definitions, and jargon that he had never used before.

303
00:33:05.520 --> 00:33:11.420
And the world said, we are in a crisis. Standard economic theory does not explain this crisis.

304
00:33:11.420 --> 00:33:16.720
They didn't know Mises, really. They didn't know the Austrian theory.

305
00:33:16.720 --> 00:33:22.620
There was the battle with Hayek. Keynes and Hayek did fight it out.

306
00:33:22.620 --> 00:33:35.340
But Hayek decided in a strategic catastrophe in a career for the rest of us, he decided in 36, he was not going to bother to go line by line to refute the general theory.

307
00:33:35.340 --> 00:33:41.100
And the world was waiting for him to do it, and he didn't do it.

308
00:33:41.100 --> 00:33:47.660
Now think of Rothbard. Rothbard got his PhD in 1956.

309
00:33:47.660 --> 00:33:52.420
Absolutely the height of the Keynesian dominance in academia.

310
00:33:52.420 --> 00:33:58.460
He comes on the scene defending Mises, who now is completely forgotten, regarded as a

311
00:33:58.460 --> 00:34:04.460
dinosaur by those who remembered and few of them remembered, at New York University, which

312
00:34:04.460 --> 00:34:09.140
would not even pay his salary for 25 years.

313
00:34:09.140 --> 00:34:11.500
They never paid a dime.

314
00:34:11.500 --> 00:34:17.120
That was all raised money from outside donors who paid that man's salary.

315
00:34:17.120 --> 00:34:25.840
He was only a visiting professor from 1944 until his retirement in 1968.

316
00:34:25.840 --> 00:34:26.840
He was an old man.

317
00:34:26.840 --> 00:34:30.160
He was about 87 years old when he finally retired.

318
00:34:30.160 --> 00:34:31.160
Still cogent.

319
00:34:31.160 --> 00:34:37.360
Didn't have good hearing, but he could communicate, he could argue, and retired.

320
00:34:37.360 --> 00:34:42.960
Cast aside, fringe.

321
00:34:42.960 --> 00:34:50.840
And in that environment appears Rothbard trying to take on the whole academic world and not

322
00:34:50.840 --> 00:34:55.000
just the economist, he's taken on the historians too.

323
00:34:55.000 --> 00:35:03.620
And he gave good credit, he gave good credit for his positions.

324
00:35:03.620 --> 00:35:11.320
He was a battler, he had magnificent ability for clarity, he was courageous, he would not

325
00:35:11.320 --> 00:35:38.320
and he hit his head against a brick wall virtually his whole career and then in the year of his death, in the year of his death, 1995, came the graphic user browser and that led to a total transformation of communication.

326
00:35:38.320 --> 00:35:59.320
And now we're in a position, because of the browser and the World Wide Web, to get this information into the hands of tens of thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of very bright people who are slowly moving from the fringe, at least to the edge of discourse.

327
00:35:59.320 --> 00:36:10.320
And the reason they are making this transformation is because the opposition has no answers, and cannot justify what they've done, and it isn't working.

328
00:36:10.320 --> 00:36:23.320
And when it works even less well than it's working today, they will find themselves having bet the farm on four words that don't work.

329
00:36:23.320 --> 00:36:35.320
They have gambled, they have rolled the dice to an extent that I would not have believed possible 24 months ago.

330
00:36:35.320 --> 00:36:48.320
They have tampered with the whole financial structure through massive intervention, massive expansion of the monetary base, and without much to show for it.

331
00:36:48.320 --> 00:37:01.320
Meanwhile, the public is getting hit, what is it, the last fiscal year that ended last month, final figure was what, 1.2, 1.3 trillion increase of admitted debt.

332
00:37:01.320 --> 00:37:09.320
And that doesn't count the increase of the unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare.

333
00:37:09.320 --> 00:37:15.320
They have issued IOUs, political IOUs but way beyond political IOUs.

334
00:37:15.320 --> 00:37:25.320
They have issued civilizational IOUs and Greece began to break, as you know, earlier this year.

335
00:37:25.320 --> 00:37:31.320
It began to look as though the European financial system was going to come down.

336
00:37:31.320 --> 00:37:39.320
They are in the old language of skating on thin ice. That barely begins to describe it.

337
00:37:39.320 --> 00:37:47.320
And it's not just that they're doing it, it's that the public, the literate public is beginning to sense that they're doing it.

338
00:37:47.320 --> 00:37:54.320
And when confidence is broken in a society, and confidence is broken in the leadership of that society,

339
00:37:54.320 --> 00:38:01.320
then you see massive transformations, rapidly, because of a loss of faith.

340
00:38:01.320 --> 00:38:15.320
And these guys, since 1936 officially and certainly since the early 1930s practically have had no answers except print more money, run larger deficits, hike the taxes.

341
00:38:15.320 --> 00:38:19.320
That's been the answer since 1930.

342
00:38:19.320 --> 00:38:29.320
And as long as they've gotten away with it through the productivity of the society, yes, they've been able to maintain the control and Keynes is still dominant.

343
00:38:29.320 --> 00:38:38.320
And Keynes, I think, is even more dominant now, right now, Keynesian ideas are probably more dominant than they've been since 1956.

344
00:38:38.320 --> 00:38:44.320
Because there's almost no opposition. And if there's opposition, it's mumbling and grousing in the background.

345
00:38:44.320 --> 00:38:56.320
You don't see major Chicago school economists coming out and saying the entire system should have been allowed to go down.

346
00:38:56.320 --> 00:39:02.120
You don't see any of them saying that. The only people who say it should have been no intervention

347
00:39:02.120 --> 00:39:08.420
and let the market determine who survives, the only group that said that was the Austrian School.

348
00:39:08.420 --> 00:39:16.220
Only this group said that. Every other academically prominent, every other establishment, tradition of economics,

349
00:39:16.220 --> 00:39:22.020
all the other representatives of all the other schools said one thing.

350
00:39:22.020 --> 00:39:26.020
We had to do it. We had to do it.

351
00:39:30.020 --> 00:39:35.020
And they have gotten onto what I think is the Titanic.

352
00:39:36.020 --> 00:39:39.020
And the Austrians have got all the lifeboats.

353
00:39:40.020 --> 00:39:42.020
That's where we are now.

354
00:39:43.020 --> 00:39:48.020
And if it unfolds as it looks as though it will unfold,

355
00:39:48.020 --> 00:40:17.020
If you have controlled massive deficits, new rounds of expanded monetary creation, then maybe, I hope not, price and wage controls, uncontrolled expansion of the money supply, then either you get hyperinflation, and if you don't get that, you get misdirected capital on a historically unprecedented basis, you maintain 10% unemployment now and forevermore unless it goes to 11%.

356
00:40:17.020 --> 00:40:26.020
You don't solve the problem and the whole time people are saying it's not working, it's not working, it visibly is not working.

357
00:40:26.020 --> 00:40:32.020
And it's in this kind of environment that you see changes of opinion.

358
00:40:32.020 --> 00:40:41.020
And you have to see it based on a long tradition of people who said it won't work.

359
00:40:41.020 --> 00:40:47.020
That wonderful phrase that we never like to use, but is always in the back of our mind,

360
00:40:47.020 --> 00:40:51.020
we told you so.

361
00:40:51.020 --> 00:41:00.020
And that does gain credibility when federal deficits don't overcome recessions.

362
00:41:00.020 --> 00:41:03.020
That does gain credibility. We told you so.

363
00:41:03.020 --> 00:41:07.020
And it's not just that we told you so, because we gave you the reasons why.

364
00:41:07.020 --> 00:41:16.700
We gave you a developed, systematic, economic framework by which we told you so.

365
00:41:16.700 --> 00:41:18.460
Now what are you going to do?

366
00:41:18.460 --> 00:41:26.140
You're going to go back to Keynes that didn't work, to Chicago school that was mute?

367
00:41:26.140 --> 00:41:29.140
What's your alternative?

368
00:41:29.140 --> 00:41:36.880
And then you have, as I say, a USP I think people can respond to, and that is tax cuts

369
00:41:36.880 --> 00:41:39.040
Increase Liberty.

370
00:41:39.040 --> 00:41:42.560
And if people want liberty, that's a powerful argument.

371
00:41:42.560 --> 00:41:49.780
Now if people really don't want liberty, then it's Katie Barthedore.

372
00:41:49.780 --> 00:41:57.440
If people really don't want liberty, then we are in the crisis of civilization.

373
00:41:57.440 --> 00:42:01.280
Then it is the road to serfdom.

374
00:42:01.280 --> 00:42:02.720
But I think it's changing.

375
00:42:02.720 --> 00:42:09.200
And I think there is enough response out there to indicate to me that young people who are

376
00:42:09.200 --> 00:42:12.760
rethinking these issues do want liberty.

377
00:42:12.760 --> 00:42:14.100
They do want liberty.

378
00:42:14.100 --> 00:42:19.120
And if you can convince them that tax cuts increase liberty, then I think we've got a

379
00:42:19.120 --> 00:42:24.160
battle ahead, but a battle, I think, that can be won.

380
00:42:24.160 --> 00:42:29.560
And I think the Mises Institute is part of that battle, the digital power of this organization

381
00:42:29.560 --> 00:42:36.720
to put words on a screen in front of millions of people and to put videos in front of large

382
00:42:36.720 --> 00:42:37.960
numbers of people.

383
00:42:37.960 --> 00:42:40.460
The technology is on our side.

384
00:42:40.460 --> 00:42:46.400
This organization understands the technology and it has a well-developed body of economic

385
00:42:46.400 --> 00:42:55.440
opinion that can stand in front of this society and say, we told you so, so let's go tell

386
00:42:55.440 --> 00:42:57.480
them.