WEBVTT

NOTE They Saw it Coming: The 19th-Century Libertarian Critique of Fascism

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.000
To speak of a 19th century libertarian critique of fascism might seem anachronistic, since fascism is generally understood as a 20th century phenomenon.

2
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:17.000
But it did not spring from nothing, and the libertarians of the 19th century saw it in the making.

3
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:26.000
Fascism differs from its close cousins, communism on the one hand, and aristocratic conservatism on the other, in several important ways.

4
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.000
Let's begin with its difference from communism.

5
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:35.920
First, where communism seeks to substitute the state for private ownership, fascism seeks

6
00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:41.960
to incorporate or co-opt private ownership into the state apparatus through public-private

7
00:00:41.960 --> 00:00:42.960
partnership.

8
00:00:42.960 --> 00:00:48.480
Thus, fascism tends to be more tempting than communism to wealthy interests, who may see

9
00:00:48.480 --> 00:00:52.880
it as a way to insulate their economic power from competition through forced cartelization

10
00:00:52.880 --> 00:00:55.320
and other corporatist stratagems.

11
00:00:55.320 --> 00:01:10.320
Second, where communist ideology tends to be cosmopolitan and internationalist, fascist ideology tends to be chauvinistically nationalist, stressing a particularist allegiance to one's country, culture or ethnicity.

12
00:01:10.320 --> 00:01:19.320
Along with this goes a suspicion of rationalism, a preference for economic autarky, and a view of life as one of inevitable but glorious struggle.

13
00:01:19.320 --> 00:01:32.320
Fascism also tends to cultivate a folksy, or folkish, man of the people, pragmatism over principles, hard overhead, pay no attention to those pointy-headed intellectuals' rhetorical style.

14
00:01:32.320 --> 00:01:36.320
These contrasts with communism should not be overstated, of course.

15
00:01:36.320 --> 00:01:44.320
Communist governments cannot afford to suppress private ownership entirely, since doing so leads swiftly to economic collapse.

16
00:01:44.320 --> 00:01:55.320
Moreover, however internationalist and cosmopolitan communist regimes may be in theory, they tend to be just as chauvinistically nationalist in practice as their fascist cousins.

17
00:01:55.320 --> 00:02:01.320
On the other hand, fascist regimes are sometimes perfectly willing to pay lip service to liberal universalism.

18
00:02:01.320 --> 00:02:07.320
All the same, there is a difference in emphasis and in strategy between fascism and communism here.

19
00:02:07.320 --> 00:02:22.320
When faced with existing institutions that threaten the power of the state, be they corporations, churches, the family, tradition, the communist impulse is by and large to abolish them, while the fascist impulse is by and large to absorb them.

20
00:02:22.320 --> 00:02:30.320
Power structures external to the state are potential rivals to the state's own power, and so states always have some reason to seek their abolition.

21
00:02:30.320 --> 00:02:33.320
Communism gives that tendency full rein.

22
00:02:33.320 --> 00:02:38.320
But power structures external to the state are also potential allies of the state,

23
00:02:38.320 --> 00:02:44.320
particularly if they serve to encourage habits of subordination and regimentation in the populace.

24
00:02:44.320 --> 00:02:48.320
And so the potential always exists for a mutually beneficial partnership.

25
00:02:48.320 --> 00:02:51.320
Herein lies the fascist strategy.

26
00:02:51.320 --> 00:02:56.320
The respects in which fascism differs from communism might seem to align it rather more closely

27
00:02:56.320 --> 00:02:59.320
with the traditional aristocratic conservatism of the Ancien Regime,

28
00:02:59.320 --> 00:03:07.320
which is likewise particularist, corporatist, mercantilist, nationalist, militarist, patriarchal, anti-rationalist.

29
00:03:07.320 --> 00:03:14.320
But fascism differs from old-style conservatism in embracing an ideal of industrial progress directed by managerial technocrats

30
00:03:14.320 --> 00:03:21.320
as well as in adopting a populist stance of championing the little guy against elites. Remember the folksiness.

31
00:03:21.320 --> 00:03:27.320
If fascism's technocratic tendencies appear to conflict with its anti-rationalist tendencies,

32
00:03:27.320 --> 00:03:34.840
Well, in the words of proto-fascist Miller-Fundenbrook, we must be strong enough to live in contradictions.

33
00:03:34.840 --> 00:03:39.160
Some of the differences between fascism and the older conservatism may be due to the advances

34
00:03:39.160 --> 00:03:42.120
won by their common foes, the liberals.

35
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:46.480
The progress of liberalism and of industry had the effect of shifting wealth, at least

36
00:03:46.480 --> 00:03:51.520
in part, from the traditional aristocracy to new private hands, thus creating new private

37
00:03:51.520 --> 00:03:55.320
interest groups with the ability to operate as political entrepreneurs.

38
00:03:55.320 --> 00:04:02.320
Hence, perhaps, the tendency toward the emergence of a plutocratic class nominally outside the traditional state apparatus.

39
00:04:02.320 --> 00:04:09.320
Likewise, the progress of democracy meant that plutocracy could hope to triumph only by donning populist guise.

40
00:04:09.320 --> 00:04:15.320
Hence, the paradox of an elitist movement marching forward under the banner of anti-elitism.

41
00:04:15.320 --> 00:04:23.320
A prime example in US history, as we just heard from Walter, being anti-trust laws and other allegedly anti-big business legislation

42
00:04:23.320 --> 00:04:28.320
and the population being vigorously lobbied for by big business itself.

43
00:04:28.320 --> 00:04:32.320
Hence, fascism's odd fusion of privilege and folksiness.

44
00:04:32.320 --> 00:04:38.320
I might call it a movement that thinks like Halliburton and talks like George W. Bush.

45
00:04:38.320 --> 00:04:44.320
The partnership between the official state apparatus and the nominally private beneficiaries of state power

46
00:04:44.320 --> 00:04:49.320
was a familiar theme for 19th century libertarians like Frederic Bastiat and Gustave de Molinari

47
00:04:49.320 --> 00:04:58.320
ended and radicalized Adam Smith's critique of mercantilist protectionism as a scheme for benefiting concentrated business interests at the expense of the general public.

48
00:04:58.320 --> 00:05:09.320
In Molinari's words, businesses asked the government to safeguard their monopolies by the same methods that it had put into effect for protecting its own.

49
00:05:09.320 --> 00:05:16.320
Libertarian sociologists like Charles Comte and Charles Du Noyé had developed an entire pre-Marxian theory of class conflict,

50
00:05:16.320 --> 00:05:25.320
according to which the key to the position of the ruling class is not, contra Marx, access to the means of production, but rather access to political power.

51
00:05:25.320 --> 00:05:33.320
When Marx called the French government a joint stock company for the exploitation of France's national wealth on behalf of the bourgeois elite

52
00:05:33.320 --> 00:05:38.320
and at the expense of production and commerce, he was only echoing what libertarians had been saying for decades.

53
00:05:38.320 --> 00:05:44.320
Herbert Spencer likewise complained of the influence of railway autocrats in American politics,

54
00:05:44.320 --> 00:05:50.320
overriding the rights of shareholders and dominating over courts of justice and state governments.

55
00:05:50.320 --> 00:05:56.320
Lysander Spooner denounced the financial and banking elite, writing as follows,

56
00:05:56.320 --> 00:06:26.320
Among savages, mere physical strength on the part of one man may enable him to rob, enslave, or kill another man, but with so-called civilized peoples, by whom soldiers in any requisite number and other instrumentalities of war in any requisite amount can always be had for money, the question of war, and consequently the question of power, is little else than a mere question of money. As a necessary consequence, those who stand ready to furnish the money are the real rulers.

57
00:06:26.320 --> 00:06:32.320
The real rulers, the emperors and kings and parliaments, are anything but the real rulers of their respective countries.

58
00:06:32.320 --> 00:06:41.320
They are little or nothing else than mere tools employed by the wealthy to rob, enslave, and if need be, murder those who have less wealth or none at all.

59
00:06:41.320 --> 00:06:48.320
The so-called sovereigns in these different governments are simply the heads or chiefs of different bands of robbers and murderers.

60
00:06:48.320 --> 00:06:54.320
And these heads or chiefs are dependent upon the lenders of blood money for the means to carry on their robberies and murders.

61
00:06:54.320 --> 00:06:59.320
They could not sustain themselves a moment but for the loans made to them by these blood money loan mongers.

62
00:06:59.320 --> 00:07:05.320
In addition to paying the interest on their bonds, they perhaps grant to the holders of them great monopolies in banking,

63
00:07:05.320 --> 00:07:08.320
like the banks of England, of France and of Vienna,

64
00:07:08.320 --> 00:07:15.320
with the agreement that these banks shall furnish money whenever in sudden emergencies it may be necessary to shoot down more of their people.

65
00:07:15.320 --> 00:07:23.320
Perhaps also by means of tariffs on competing imports, they give great monopolies to certain branches of industry in which these lenders of blood money are engaged.

66
00:07:23.320 --> 00:07:46.320
As this quotation from Spooner shows, 19th century libertarians also saw a connection between plutocracy and militarism, and sharply criticized what today would be called the military-industrial complex.

67
00:07:46.320 --> 00:07:50.700
Spencer, for example, railed against the military aid and state conferred privileges enjoyed

68
00:07:50.700 --> 00:07:55.320
with East India Company, which enabled it, he says, to commit deeds of blood and rapin

69
00:07:55.320 --> 00:07:59.660
in India where the police authorities league with wealthy scamps to allow the machinery

70
00:07:59.660 --> 00:08:03.000
of the law to be used for purposes of extortion.

71
00:08:03.000 --> 00:08:07.600
Such abuses, Spencer noted, were mainly due to the carrying on of state management and

72
00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:11.400
with the help of state funds and state force.

73
00:08:11.400 --> 00:08:15.120
Had the military might of the British Empire not been placed at the disposal of the company's

74
00:08:15.120 --> 00:08:16.120
He says,

75
00:08:16.120 --> 00:08:20.120
Their defenseless state would have compelled them to behave differently.

76
00:08:20.120 --> 00:08:23.720
They would have necessity of turn their attention wholly to the development of commerce and

77
00:08:23.720 --> 00:08:26.760
conducted themselves peaceably.

78
00:08:26.760 --> 00:08:31.720
Writing in the mid-1800s, Spencer complained especially of the grievous salt monopoly,

79
00:08:31.720 --> 00:08:34.880
which would of course become the chief catalyst for the Indian independence movement nearly

80
00:08:34.880 --> 00:08:37.240
a century later.

81
00:08:37.240 --> 00:08:40.400
But who, Spencer wrote, are the gainers?

82
00:08:40.400 --> 00:08:42.920
The monopolists.

83
00:08:42.920 --> 00:08:47.120
These are their pockets in the shape of salaries to civil and military officers, dividends

84
00:08:47.120 --> 00:08:52.200
of profits, etc., has gone a large part of the enormous revenue of the East India Company.

85
00:08:52.200 --> 00:08:56.080
The rich owners of colonial property must have protection, as well as their brethren,

86
00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:58.180
the landowners of England.

87
00:08:58.180 --> 00:09:02.600
The one their prohibitive duties, the other their corn laws, and the resources of the

88
00:09:02.600 --> 00:09:07.820
poor, starved, overburdened people must be still further drained to augment the overflowing

89
00:09:07.820 --> 00:09:11.400
wealth of the rulers."

90
00:09:11.400 --> 00:09:17.120
Because plutocracy, these libertarian writers thought, drives militarism, but they also

91
00:09:17.120 --> 00:09:20.320
held that militarism drives plutocracy.

92
00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:25.340
Thus the American Spencerian William Graham Sumner argued, quote, militarism, expansion

93
00:09:25.340 --> 00:09:28.400
and imperialism will all favor plutocracy.

94
00:09:28.400 --> 00:09:33.560
In the first place, war and expansion will favor jobbery, both in the dependence and at

95
00:09:33.560 --> 00:09:34.560
home.

96
00:09:34.560 --> 00:09:35.560
Jobbery, a wonderful word for rent-seeking.

97
00:09:35.560 --> 00:09:39.780
In the second place, they will take away the attention of the people from what the plutocrats

98
00:09:39.780 --> 00:09:48.780
In the third place, they will cause large expenditures of the people's money, the return for which will not go into the Treasury, but into the hands of a few schemers.

99
00:09:48.780 --> 00:09:53.780
In the fourth place, they will call for a large public debt and taxes.

100
00:09:53.780 --> 00:10:03.780
And these things especially tend to make men unequal, because any social burdens bear more heavily on the weak than on the strong, and so make the weak weaker and the strong stronger."

101
00:10:03.780 --> 00:10:22.780
While the influence of private wealth and government was not exactly anything new, 19th century libertarians tended to think it had been given a new impetus by the rise of democracy and its inevitable accompaniment to interest group politics, what the French liberals called ulcerous government.

102
00:10:22.780 --> 00:10:36.780
A number of libertarians argue that representative democracy leads to a struggle for political influence among competing special interest groups, and unsurprisingly, it's the wealthier and more concentrated interests that tend to win out.

103
00:10:36.780 --> 00:10:46.780
Sumner, for example, maintained that democracy, far from being, as is usually supposed, the arch-enemy of plutocracy, is actually plutocracy's crucial enabler.

104
00:10:46.780 --> 00:11:06.780
From Sumner, the methods and machinery of democratic, republican self-government, caucuses, primaries, committees, conventions, lend themselves perhaps more easily than other political methods and machinery to the uses of selfish cliques which seek political influence for interested purposes.

105
00:11:06.780 --> 00:11:14.780
By the way, for Sumner on this, I highly recommend Scott Trask's article in the recent Journal of the Britannian Studies.

106
00:11:14.780 --> 00:11:28.780
But on this point, writers like Sumner were simply developing the implications of James Madison's remark in The Federalist, that the extreme mutability to which representative governments are liable is likely to work to the benefit of a wealthy minority.

107
00:11:28.780 --> 00:11:51.780
It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read or so incoherent that they cannot be understood, if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow.

108
00:11:51.780 --> 00:11:57.780
Another effect of public instability is the unreasonable advantage it gives to the sagacious,

109
00:11:57.780 --> 00:12:03.780
enterprising and moneyed few over the industrious and uninformed mass of the people.

110
00:12:03.780 --> 00:12:09.780
Every new regulation concerning commerce or revenue, or in any way affecting the value of the different species of property,

111
00:12:09.780 --> 00:12:14.780
presents a new harvest to those who watch the change and can trace its consequences,

112
00:12:14.780 --> 00:12:20.780
a harvest reared not by themselves but by the toils and cares of the great body of their fellow citizens.

113
00:12:20.780 --> 00:12:27.780
This is a state of things in which it may be said, with some truth, that laws are made for the few, not the many."

114
00:12:27.780 --> 00:12:36.780
And Maddison Histerne was drawing on the ancient Athenian argument that electoral systems are actually oligarchic rather than democratic.

115
00:12:36.780 --> 00:12:44.780
In the 19th century both libertarians and Marxists were complaining about the power of wealthy elites.

116
00:12:44.780 --> 00:12:49.780
But they disagreed on the remedy, because they disagreed on the origin of the problem.

117
00:12:49.780 --> 00:12:53.780
For the Marxists, plutocracy was a product of the market.

118
00:12:53.780 --> 00:13:01.780
The ruling class emerged through commerce and only subsequently seized control of the state in order to consolidate its already established hegemony.

119
00:13:01.780 --> 00:13:07.780
Marx himself was ambivalent on this question, but Engels solidified the orthodox Marxist position.

120
00:13:07.780 --> 00:13:11.780
Hence, for the Marxists, it was the market that needed to be suppressed.

121
00:13:11.780 --> 00:13:17.780
This is the origin of the left-wing view that fascism is simply a manifestation of free market capitalism.

122
00:13:17.780 --> 00:13:27.780
For the libertarians, by contrast, a ruling class depends for its power on the power of the state, and so is the latter that needed to be suppressed.

123
00:13:27.780 --> 00:13:34.780
The libertarians did not, however, make the mistake of supposing that state power by itself was the sole problem.

124
00:13:34.780 --> 00:13:46.780
Since rulers are generally outnumbered by those they rule, these thinkers saw that state power itself cannot survive except through popular acceptance, which the state lacks the power to compel.

125
00:13:46.780 --> 00:13:57.780
In Spencer's words, in the case of a government representing a dominant class, the very existence of a class monopolizing all power is due to certain sentiments in the community.

126
00:13:57.780 --> 00:14:00.780
Likewise, Chaljun Waiye writes,

127
00:14:00.780 --> 00:14:07.780
The first mistake, and to my mind the most serious, is not sufficiently seeing difficulties where they are,

128
00:14:07.780 --> 00:14:10.780
not recognizing them except in governments.

129
00:14:10.780 --> 00:14:14.780
Since it is indeed there that the greatest obstacles ordinarily make themselves felt,

130
00:14:14.780 --> 00:14:20.780
it is assumed that that is where they exist, and that alone is where one endeavors to attack them.

131
00:14:20.780 --> 00:14:24.780
One is unwilling to see that nations are the material from which governments are made,

132
00:14:24.780 --> 00:14:28.780
that is from their bosom that governments emerge."

133
00:14:28.780 --> 00:14:32.780
Or again, as American anarchist Edwin Walker pointedly asked,

134
00:14:32.780 --> 00:14:36.780
if statism were the cause of all social evil, what on earth could be the cause of statism?

135
00:14:36.780 --> 00:14:40.780
19th century libertarians then

136
00:14:40.780 --> 00:14:44.780
tended to be radical or dialectical thinkers in Chris Kibera's sense.

137
00:14:44.780 --> 00:14:48.780
They viewed state power as part of an interlocking system of mutually reinforcing

138
00:14:48.780 --> 00:14:52.780
social practices and structures, and were intensely interested in the institutional

139
00:14:52.780 --> 00:15:10.780
It is in their analysis of these accompaniments that we see them grappling with the specifically fascist aspects of statist culture.

140
00:15:10.780 --> 00:15:19.780
Writers like Du Noyer, Spencer and Molinari saw a close connection between statism and militarism because, in their view, the state originated in war.

141
00:15:19.780 --> 00:15:35.780
Tribes that succeeded in fending off invaders became increasingly dependent on their warrior class, while tribes that failed to fend off invaders became the subjects of the enemy tribe's warrior class, and in either case the warrior class was thereby positioned to become a ruling class.

142
00:15:35.780 --> 00:15:48.780
Dunwaye and Spencer also saw a reciprocal relationship between statism and militarism on the one hand and patriarchy on the other, since they regarded the rule of men over women as the original class division from which all later ones grew.

143
00:15:48.780 --> 00:15:56.780
They would thus not have been surprised to see fascist movements glorifying military conquest on the one hand and the patriarchal family on the other.

144
00:15:56.780 --> 00:16:05.780
They would also not have been surprised to notice that fascism takes its name from the fascis, the Roman symbol of an axe and a bundle of rods.

145
00:16:05.780 --> 00:16:10.780
A bundle of rods by itself indicated that an official had the power to inflict corporal punishment.

146
00:16:10.780 --> 00:16:15.780
Adding an axe to the bundle of rods implied the power to inflict death as well.

147
00:16:15.780 --> 00:16:21.780
Bastiat regarded the prevailing reverence for ancient Rome as a pernicious cultural influence.

148
00:16:21.780 --> 00:16:23.780
He wrote as follows,

149
00:16:25.780 --> 00:16:27.780
What was Roman patriotism?

150
00:16:27.780 --> 00:16:33.780
Hatred of foreigners, the destruction of all civilization, the stifling of all progress,

151
00:16:33.780 --> 00:16:39.780
the scourging of the world with fire and sword, the chaining of women, children and old men to triumphal chariots.

152
00:16:39.780 --> 00:16:42.780
This was glory. This was virtue.

153
00:16:42.780 --> 00:16:49.660
The lesson has not been lost, and it is from Rome, undoubtedly, that this adage still comes

154
00:16:49.660 --> 00:16:50.660
to us.

155
00:16:50.660 --> 00:16:56.520
One nation's loss is another nation's gain, an adage that still governs the world.

156
00:16:56.520 --> 00:17:01.900
To acquire an idea of Roman morality, imagine in the heart of Paris, an organization of

157
00:17:01.900 --> 00:17:07.300
men who hate to work, determined to satisfy their wants by deceit and force, and consequently

158
00:17:07.300 --> 00:17:09.940
at war with society.

159
00:17:09.940 --> 00:17:14.320
Such as a certain moral code and even some solid virtues, will soon manifest themselves

160
00:17:14.320 --> 00:17:21.160
in such an organization, courage, perseverance, self-control, prudence, discipline, constancy

161
00:17:21.160 --> 00:17:26.980
and misfortune, deep secrecy, punctilio, devotion to the community.

162
00:17:26.980 --> 00:17:31.780
Such undoubtedly will be the virtues that necessity and prevailing opinion would develop

163
00:17:31.780 --> 00:17:33.740
among these brigands.

164
00:17:33.740 --> 00:17:38.520
Such were the virtues of the buccaneers, such were those of the Romans.

165
00:17:38.520 --> 00:17:43.160
It may be said in regard to the latter that the grandeur of their enterprise and the immensity

166
00:17:43.160 --> 00:17:48.620
of their success has thrown so glorious a veil over their crimes as to transform the

167
00:17:48.620 --> 00:17:51.120
crimes into virtues.

168
00:17:51.120 --> 00:17:53.520
This is precisely why that school is so pernicious.

169
00:17:53.520 --> 00:18:02.080
It is not abject vice, it is vice crowned with splendor that seduces men's souls."

170
00:18:02.080 --> 00:18:06.960
Rome incidentally was another culture in which plutocracy triumphed by adopting a democratic

171
00:18:06.960 --> 00:18:36.960
Spenser was convinced that Western culture in his day was entering a retrograde phase, a phase he called rebarbarization, in which the values of industrial society, the society of voluntary cooperation and mutual benefit, were yielding once more to the older values of militant society, of hierarchy, regimentation, aggressive impulses, anti-intellectuality, and a zero-sum view of human existence.

172
00:18:36.960 --> 00:18:48.960
There is now evidence of rebarbarization not only in official military policy, but also in cultural developments, as for example in the increasing militarization of the church, or the recrudescence of what he called the religion of enmity.

173
00:18:48.960 --> 00:18:51.960
Spencer was distressed to observe that, quote,

174
00:18:51.960 --> 00:18:58.460
In the church services, held on the occasion of the departure of troops for South Africa,

175
00:18:58.460 --> 00:19:06.460
he was talking about the Boer War, certain hymns are used in a manner which substitutes for the spiritual enemy, the human enemy.

176
00:19:06.460 --> 00:19:13.460
Thus for a generation past, under cover of the forms of a religion which preaches peace, love and forgiveness,

177
00:19:13.460 --> 00:19:17.960
there has been a perpetual shouting of the words war and blood, fire and battle,

178
00:19:17.960 --> 00:19:21.960
and a Continual Exercise of the Antagonistic Feelings.

179
00:19:21.960 --> 00:19:29.960
Another cultural development that Spencer identified as a symptom of rebarbarization was the rise of professional sports.

180
00:19:29.960 --> 00:19:31.960
In Spencer's words,

181
00:19:31.960 --> 00:19:38.960
Naturally, along with exaltation of brute force in its armed form, showing how widely the trait of coerciveness,

182
00:19:38.960 --> 00:19:43.960
which is the essential element in militancy, has pervaded the nation,

183
00:19:43.960 --> 00:19:48.960
There has gone a cultivation of skilled physical force under the form of athleticism.

184
00:19:48.960 --> 00:19:57.960
The word is quite modern for the reason that a generation ago, the facts to be embraced under it were not sufficiently numerous and conspicuous to call for a word.

185
00:19:57.960 --> 00:20:09.960
In my early days, sports, so called, were almost exclusively represented by one weekly paper, Bell's Life in London, found, I am told, in the haunts of rowdies and in taverns of a low class.

186
00:20:09.960 --> 00:20:15.960
Since then, the growth has been such that the acquirement of skill in leading games has become an absorbing occupation.

187
00:20:15.960 --> 00:20:23.960
Meanwhile, to satisfy the demand journalism has been developing, so that besides sundry daily and weekly papers devoted wholly to sports,

188
00:20:23.960 --> 00:20:32.960
the ordinary daily and weekly papers give reports of events in all localities, and not infrequently a daily paper has a whole page devoted to sports.

189
00:20:32.960 --> 00:20:41.040
While bodily superiority is coming to the front, mental superiority is retreating into

190
00:20:41.040 --> 00:20:42.040
the background.

191
00:20:42.040 --> 00:20:46.840
Thus, various changes point back to those medieval days when courage and bodily power

192
00:20:46.840 --> 00:20:50.200
were the sole qualifications of the ruling classes.

193
00:20:50.200 --> 00:20:55.920
While such culture as existed was confined to priests and the inmates of monasteries."

194
00:20:55.920 --> 00:21:03.120
I suspect Spencer would not enjoy chanting war eagle in the Auburn stadium.

195
00:21:03.120 --> 00:21:08.980
Such symptoms of militarization and barbarization in the arena of culture proceeded in tandem

196
00:21:08.980 --> 00:21:13.840
with analogous changes in government, including a shift in power from civilian to military

197
00:21:13.840 --> 00:21:19.200
authority and within the civilian government from parliamentary to executive authority.

198
00:21:19.200 --> 00:21:24.920
In 1881, Spencer referred to the measures then being taken in Germany, quote, for extending

199
00:21:24.920 --> 00:21:28.620
Directly and Indirectly, The Control Over Popular Life

200
00:21:28.620 --> 00:21:35.560
On the one hand, there are the laws which up to the middle of last year, 1880, 224 socialist

201
00:21:35.560 --> 00:21:42.760
societies have been closed, 180 periodicals suppressed, 317 books forbidden.

202
00:21:42.760 --> 00:21:47.320
On the other hand may be named Prince Bismarck's scheme for re-establishing guilds, bodies

203
00:21:47.320 --> 00:21:52.400
which by their regulations coerce the members, and his scheme of state insurance.

204
00:21:52.400 --> 00:21:56.920
In all which changes, we see progress toward the replacing of civil organization by military

205
00:21:56.920 --> 00:22:01.760
organization, towards the strengthening of restraints over the individual and regulation

206
00:22:01.760 --> 00:22:06.680
of his life in greater detail."

207
00:22:06.680 --> 00:22:10.240
Anne Spencer saw England beginning to follow in Germany's footsteps.

208
00:22:10.240 --> 00:22:14.960
He noted with alarm, quote, a manifest extension of the militant spirit and discipline among

209
00:22:14.960 --> 00:22:20.600
the police, who, wearing helmet-shaped hats, beginning to carry revolvers, and looking

210
00:22:20.600 --> 00:22:24.180
The

211
00:22:24.180 --> 00:22:27.620
Civilians

212
00:22:27.620 --> 00:22:28.620
and he objected to

213
00:22:28.620 --> 00:22:34.140
the increasing assimilation of the volunteer forces to the regular army, now going to the

214
00:22:34.140 --> 00:22:40.480
extent of proposing to make the volunteer forces available abroad, so that instead of defensive

215
00:22:40.480 --> 00:22:46.500
action for which they were created, they can be used for offensive action.

216
00:22:46.500 --> 00:22:52.500
A few years later, on the other side of the Atlantic, Voltaire and Déclair noted analogous developments in America.

217
00:22:52.500 --> 00:22:58.500
Quote, Our fathers thought they had guarded against the standing army for providing for the voluntary militia.

218
00:22:58.500 --> 00:23:06.500
In our day we have lived to see this militia declared part of the regular military force of the United States and subject to the same demands as the regulars.

219
00:23:06.500 --> 00:23:12.500
Within another generation we shall probably see its members in the regular pay of the general government. End quote.

220
00:23:12.500 --> 00:23:30.500
At the time of the Spanish-American War, Sumner was writing of the conquest of the United States by Spain, meaning that the United States, while victorious over Spain on the battlefield, was succumbing ideologically to the imperialist ideas that Spain had traditionally represented.

221
00:23:30.500 --> 00:23:40.500
And E. L. Godkin, the editor of The Nation, at that time a classical liberal periodical, wrote despairingly in 1900 of the eclipse of liberalism.

222
00:23:40.500 --> 00:23:57.500
Quote, nationalism in the sense of national greed has supplanted liberalism by making the aggrandizement of a particular nation a higher end than the welfare of mankind, it has sophisticated the moral sense of Christendom.

223
00:23:57.500 --> 00:24:03.500
This is the old sense of the word sophisticated, made sophisticated not made fancy.

224
00:24:03.500 --> 00:24:11.500
We hear no more of natural rights, but of inferior races, whose part it is to submit to the government of those whom God has made the superiors.

225
00:24:11.500 --> 00:24:20.500
The old fallacy of divine right has once more asserted its ruinous power, and before it is again repudiated, there must be international struggles on a terrific scale.

226
00:24:20.500 --> 00:24:25.500
At home, all criticism on the foreign policy of our rulers is denounced as unpatriotic.

227
00:24:25.500 --> 00:24:29.500
They must not be changed, for the national policy must be continuous.

228
00:24:29.500 --> 00:24:35.500
Abroad, the rulers of every country must hasten to every scene of international plunder that they may secure their share.

229
00:24:35.500 --> 00:24:41.500
To succeed in these predatory expeditions, the restraints on parliamentary government must be cast aside."

230
00:24:41.500 --> 00:24:50.500
In short, the 19th century libertarians observed the rise of the various tendencies that would come together to make fascism.

231
00:24:50.500 --> 00:24:58.500
Militarism, Corporatism, Regimentation, Nationalist Chauvinism, Plutocracy and Populist Guise,

232
00:24:58.500 --> 00:25:05.500
the call for strong leaders and national greatness, the glorification of conflict over commerce and of brute force over intellect,

233
00:25:05.500 --> 00:25:08.500
and they bitterly opposed the whole package.

234
00:25:08.500 --> 00:25:14.500
And although they ultimately lost that battle, their fallen banner is ours to pick up.

235
00:25:14.500 --> 00:25:21.500
Let me give Sumner the last word. He's writing once again of the Spanish-American War.

236
00:25:44.500 --> 00:25:48.700
For a public which our fathers formed was a glorious dream which demands more than a

237
00:25:48.700 --> 00:25:52.460
word of respect and affection before it passes away.

238
00:25:52.460 --> 00:25:56.560
Their idea was that they would never allow any of the old social and political abuses

239
00:25:56.560 --> 00:25:58.960
of the old world to grow up here.

240
00:25:58.960 --> 00:26:03.140
There were to be no armies except a militia, which would have no functions for those of

241
00:26:03.140 --> 00:26:04.700
police.

242
00:26:04.700 --> 00:26:11.080
They would have no court and no pomp, no orders, ribbons, decorations or titles.

243
00:26:11.080 --> 00:26:12.940
They would have no public debt.

244
00:26:12.940 --> 00:26:16.460
There was to be no grand diplomacy.

245
00:26:16.460 --> 00:26:20.580
No reason of state to cost the life and happiness of citizens.

246
00:26:20.580 --> 00:26:25.580
Our fathers would have an economical government, even if grand people called it a parsimonious

247
00:26:25.580 --> 00:26:26.580
one.

248
00:26:26.580 --> 00:26:31.260
And taxes should be no greater than were absolutely necessary to pay for such a government.

249
00:26:31.260 --> 00:26:34.820
The citizen was to keep all the rest of his earnings and use them as he thought best for

250
00:26:34.820 --> 00:26:37.860
the happiness of himself and his family.

251
00:26:37.860 --> 00:26:42.940
He was, above all, to be ensured peace and quiet, while he pursued his honest industry

252
00:26:42.940 --> 00:26:44.880
and obeyed the laws.

253
00:26:44.880 --> 00:26:49.800
No adventurous policies of conquest or ambition would ever be undertaken by a free, democratic

254
00:26:49.800 --> 00:26:50.800
republic.

255
00:26:50.800 --> 00:26:54.960
Therefore, the citizen here would never be forced to leave his family or to give his

256
00:26:54.960 --> 00:26:59.760
sons to shed blood for glory and to leave widows and orphans in misery for nothing.

257
00:26:59.760 --> 00:27:05.320
It is by virtue of these ideals that we have been isolated, isolated in a position which

258
00:27:05.320 --> 00:27:12.320
And yet there are people who are boasting of their patriotism because they say that we have taken our place now amongst the nations of the earth by virtue of this war.
