WEBVTT

NOTE 22. The Nature of the State

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.600
Part 3 The State vs. Liberty

2
00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:10.840
Chapter 22 The Nature of the State

3
00:00:10.840 --> 00:00:16.000
So far in this book we have developed a theory of liberty and property rights and have outlined

4
00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:20.320
the legal code that would be necessary to defend those rights.

5
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:21.560
What of government?

6
00:00:21.560 --> 00:00:23.020
The state.

7
00:00:23.020 --> 00:00:26.360
What is its proper role, if any?

8
00:00:26.360 --> 00:00:31.760
Most people, including most political theorists, believe that once one concedes the importance

9
00:00:31.760 --> 00:00:37.640
or even the vital necessity of some particular activity of the state, such as the provision

10
00:00:37.640 --> 00:00:44.800
of a legal code, that one has ipso facto conceded the necessity of the state itself.

11
00:00:44.800 --> 00:00:50.480
The state indeed performs many important and necessary functions, from provision of law

12
00:00:50.480 --> 00:00:55.800
to the supply of police and firefighters, to building and maintaining the streets, to

13
00:00:55.800 --> 00:00:57.920
and Delivery of the Mail.

14
00:00:57.920 --> 00:01:04.240
But this in no way demonstrates that only the state can perform such functions, or indeed

15
00:01:04.240 --> 00:01:08.400
that it performs them even passively well.

16
00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:14.420
Suppose for example that there are many competing cantaloupe stores in a particular neighborhood.

17
00:01:14.420 --> 00:01:20.200
One of the cantaloupe dealers, Smith, then uses violence to drive all of his competitors

18
00:01:20.200 --> 00:01:22.300
out of the neighborhood.

19
00:01:22.300 --> 00:01:28.180
He has thereby employed violence to establish a coerced monopoly over the sale of cantaloupes

20
00:01:28.180 --> 00:01:31.220
in a given territorial area.

21
00:01:31.220 --> 00:01:36.740
Does that mean that Smith's use of violence to establish and maintain his monopoly was

22
00:01:36.740 --> 00:01:41.200
essential to the provision of cantaloupes in the neighborhood?

23
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:47.160
Certainly not, for there were existing competitors as well as potential rivals should Smith ever

24
00:01:47.160 --> 00:01:50.540
relax his use and threat of violence.

25
00:01:50.540 --> 00:01:59.540
Moreover, economics demonstrates that Smith, as a coercive monopolist, will tend to perform his service badly and inefficiently.

26
00:01:59.540 --> 00:02:07.540
Protected from competition by the use of force, Smith can afford to provide his service in a costly and inefficient manner,

27
00:02:07.540 --> 00:02:13.540
since the consumers are deprived of any possible range of alternative choice.

28
00:02:13.540 --> 00:02:19.540
Furthermore, should a group arise to call for the abolition of Smith's coercive monopoly,

29
00:02:19.540 --> 00:02:30.540
There would be very few protesters with the temerity to accuse these abolitionists of wishing to deprive the consumers of their much desired cantaloupes.

30
00:02:30.540 --> 00:02:38.540
And yet, the state is only our hypothetical Smith on a gigantic and all-encompassing scale.

31
00:02:38.540 --> 00:02:53.540
Throughout history, groups of men calling themselves the government or the state have attempted, usually successfully, to gain a compulsory monopoly of the commanding heights of the economy and the society.

32
00:02:53.540 --> 00:03:17.540
In particular, the State has arrogated to itself a compulsory monopoly over police and military services, the provision of law, judicial decision-making, the mint and the power to create money, unused land, the public domain, streets and highways, rivers and coastal waters and the means of delivering mail.

33
00:03:17.540 --> 00:03:26.540
Control of land and transportation has long been an excellent method of assuring overall control of a society.

34
00:03:26.540 --> 00:03:35.540
In many countries, highways began as a means of allowing the government to move its troops conveniently throughout its subject country.

35
00:03:35.540 --> 00:03:41.540
Control of the money supply is a way to assure the state an easy and rapid revenue,

36
00:03:41.540 --> 00:03:53.540
And the state makes sure that no private competitors are allowed to invade its self-arrogated monopoly of the power to counterfeit, that is, create new money.

37
00:03:53.540 --> 00:04:04.540
Monopoly of the Postal Service has long been a convenient method for the state to keep an eye on possibly unruly and subversive opposition to its rule.

38
00:04:04.540 --> 00:04:10.760
In most historical epochs, the state has also kept a tight control over religion, usually

39
00:04:10.760 --> 00:04:16.980
cementing a comfortable, mutually supportive alliance with an established church.

40
00:04:16.980 --> 00:04:22.200
With the state granting the priests power and wealth, and the church in turn teaching

41
00:04:22.200 --> 00:04:28.740
the subject population their divinely proclaimed duty to obey Caesar.

42
00:04:28.740 --> 00:04:33.840
But now that religion has lost much of its persuasive power in society, the state is

43
00:04:33.840 --> 00:04:39.880
is often willing to let religion alone and to concentrate on similar, if looser, alliances

44
00:04:39.880 --> 00:04:46.640
with more secular intellectuals. In either case, the state relies on control of the levers

45
00:04:46.640 --> 00:04:54.400
of propaganda to persuade its subjects to obey or even exalt their rulers. But above

46
00:04:54.400 --> 00:05:00.780
all, the crucial monopoly is the state's control of the use of violence, of the police and

47
00:05:00.780 --> 00:05:06.400
and Armed Services and of the Courts, the locus of ultimate decision-making power in

48
00:05:06.400 --> 00:05:10.660
disputes over crimes and contracts.

49
00:05:10.660 --> 00:05:16.140
Control of the police and the army is particularly important in enforcing and assuring all of

50
00:05:16.140 --> 00:05:24.440
the State's other powers, including the all-important power to extract its revenue by coercion.

51
00:05:24.440 --> 00:05:30.960
For there is one crucially important power inherent in the nature of the state apparatus.

52
00:05:30.960 --> 00:05:37.400
All other persons and groups in society, except for acknowledged and sporadic criminals such

53
00:05:37.400 --> 00:05:44.280
as thieves and bank robbers, obtain their income voluntarily, either by selling goods

54
00:05:44.280 --> 00:05:50.600
and services to the consuming public, or by voluntary gift, for example, membership in

55
00:05:50.600 --> 00:05:55.920
and a club or association, bequest or inheritance.

56
00:05:55.920 --> 00:06:02.620
Only the state obtains its revenue by coercion, by threatening dire penalties should the income

57
00:06:02.620 --> 00:06:05.300
not be forthcoming.

58
00:06:05.300 --> 00:06:11.420
That coercion is known as taxation, although in less regularized epochs it was often known

59
00:06:11.420 --> 00:06:14.140
as tribute.

60
00:06:14.140 --> 00:06:19.820
Taxation is theft, purely and simply, even though it is theft on a grand and colossal

61
00:06:19.820 --> 00:06:35.940
It would be an instructive exercise for the skeptical reader to try to frame a definition

62
00:06:35.940 --> 00:06:40.900
of taxation which does not also include theft.

63
00:06:40.900 --> 00:06:45.520
Like the robber, the state demands money at the equivalent of gunpoint.

64
00:06:45.520 --> 00:06:51.460
If the taxpayer refuses to pay, his assets are seized by force, and if he should resist

65
00:06:51.460 --> 00:06:57.360
such depredation, he will be arrested or shot if he should continue to resist.

66
00:06:57.360 --> 00:07:03.920
It is true that state apologists maintain that taxation is really voluntary.

67
00:07:03.920 --> 00:07:08.940
One simple but instructive refutation of this claim is to ponder what would happen if the

68
00:07:08.940 --> 00:07:15.280
government were to abolish taxation and to confine itself to simple requests for voluntary

69
00:07:15.280 --> 00:07:17.380
Contributions.

70
00:07:17.380 --> 00:07:23.440
Does anyone really believe that anything comparable to the current vast revenues of the state

71
00:07:23.440 --> 00:07:26.840
would continue to pour into its coffers?

72
00:07:26.840 --> 00:07:32.040
It is likely that even those theorists who claim that punishment never deters action

73
00:07:32.040 --> 00:07:34.940
would balk at such a claim.

74
00:07:34.940 --> 00:07:40.740
The great economist Josef Schumpeter was correct when he acidly wrote that the theory which

75
00:07:40.740 --> 00:07:56.740
which construes taxes on the analogy of club dues, or of the purchase of the services of, say, a doctor, only proves how far removed this part of the social sciences is from scientific habits of mind.

76
00:07:56.740 --> 00:08:09.740
It has been recently maintained by economists that taxation is really voluntary because it is a method for everyone to make sure that everyone else pays for a unanimously desired project.

77
00:08:09.740 --> 00:08:15.740
Everyone in an area, for example, is assumed to desire the government to build a dam.

78
00:08:15.740 --> 00:08:25.740
But if A and B contribute voluntarily to the project, they cannot be sure that C and D will not shirk their similar responsibilities.

79
00:08:25.740 --> 00:08:39.740
Therefore, all of the individuals, A, B, C, D, etc., each of whom wish to contribute to building the dam, agree to coerce each other through taxation.

80
00:08:39.740 --> 00:08:47.740
Hence, the tax is not really coercion. There are, however, a great many flaws in this doctrine.

81
00:08:47.740 --> 00:08:59.740
First is the inner contradiction between voluntarism and coercion. A coercion of all against all does not make any of this coercion voluntary.

82
00:08:59.740 --> 00:09:16.740
Secondly, even if we assume for the moment that each individual would like to contribute to the dam, there is no way of assuring that the tax levied on each person is no more than he would be willing to pay voluntarily even if everyone else contributed.

83
00:09:16.740 --> 00:09:24.740
The government may levy a thousand dollars on Jones, even though he might have been willing to pay no more than five hundred dollars.

84
00:09:24.740 --> 00:09:40.740
The point is that precisely because taxation is compulsory, there is no way to assure, as is done automatically on the free market, that the amount any person contributes is what he would really be willing to pay.

85
00:09:40.740 --> 00:09:55.740
In the free society, a consumer who voluntarily buys a TV set for $200 demonstrates by his freely chosen action that the TV set is worth more to him than the $200 he surrenders.

86
00:09:55.740 --> 00:10:01.740
In short, he demonstrates that the $200 is a voluntary payment.

87
00:10:01.740 --> 00:10:14.740
Or, a club member in the free society, by paying annual dues of $200, demonstrates that he considers the benefits of club membership worth at least $200.

88
00:10:14.740 --> 00:10:26.740
But in the case of taxation, a man's surrender to the threat of coercion demonstrates no voluntary preference whatsoever for any alleged benefits he receives.

89
00:10:26.740 --> 00:10:29.740
Thirdly, the argument proves too much.

90
00:10:29.740 --> 00:10:37.740
For the supply of any service, not only dams, can be expanded by the use of the tax financing arm.

91
00:10:37.740 --> 00:10:43.740
Suppose, for example, that the Catholic Church were established in a country through taxation.

92
00:10:43.740 --> 00:10:49.740
The Catholic Church would undoubtedly be larger than if it relied on voluntary contributions.

93
00:10:49.740 --> 00:10:54.740
But can it therefore be argued that such establishment is really voluntary,

94
00:10:54.740 --> 00:11:00.360
voluntary, because everyone wants to coerce everyone else into paying into the church,

95
00:11:00.360 --> 00:11:05.160
in order to make sure that no one shirks this duty?

96
00:11:05.160 --> 00:11:08.980
And fourthly, the argument is simply a mystical one.

97
00:11:08.980 --> 00:11:15.080
How can anyone know that everyone is really paying his taxes voluntarily on the strength

98
00:11:15.080 --> 00:11:17.700
of this sophistical argument?

99
00:11:17.700 --> 00:11:23.900
What of those people, environmentalists say, who are opposed to dams per se?

100
00:11:23.900 --> 00:11:27.400
Is their payment really voluntary?

101
00:11:27.400 --> 00:11:33.380
Would the coerced payment of taxes to a Catholic Church by Protestants or atheists also be

102
00:11:33.380 --> 00:11:35.420
voluntary?

103
00:11:35.420 --> 00:11:40.940
And what of the growing body of libertarians in our society, who oppose all action by the

104
00:11:40.940 --> 00:11:43.220
government on principle?

105
00:11:43.220 --> 00:11:50.100
In what way can this argument hold that their tax payments are really voluntary?

106
00:11:50.100 --> 00:11:57.380
In fact, the existence of at least one libertarian or anarchist in a country is enough by itself

107
00:11:57.380 --> 00:12:03.620
to demolish the really voluntary argument for taxation.

108
00:12:03.620 --> 00:12:09.180
It is also contended that in democratic governments, the act of voting makes the government and

109
00:12:09.180 --> 00:12:12.980
all its works and powers truly voluntary.

110
00:12:12.980 --> 00:12:17.440
Again, there are many fallacies with this popular argument.

111
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:22.420
In the first place, even if the majority of the public specifically endorsed each and

112
00:12:22.420 --> 00:12:28.300
every particular act of the government, this would simply be majority tyranny, rather than

113
00:12:28.300 --> 00:12:33.140
a voluntary act undergone by every person in the country.

114
00:12:33.140 --> 00:12:38.300
Murder is murder, theft is theft, whether undertaken by one man against another, or

115
00:12:38.300 --> 00:12:44.580
by a group, or even by the majority of people within a given territorial area.

116
00:12:44.580 --> 00:12:50.460
The fact that a majority might support or condone an act of theft does not diminish the criminal

117
00:12:50.460 --> 00:12:54.180
essence of the act, or its grave injustice.

118
00:12:54.180 --> 00:12:59.500
Otherwise, we would have to say, for example, that any Jews murdered by the democratically

119
00:12:59.500 --> 00:13:06.100
elected Nazi government were not murdered, but only voluntarily committed suicide, surely

120
00:13:06.100 --> 00:13:12.820
the grotesque but logical implication of the democracy-as-voluntary doctrine.

121
00:13:12.820 --> 00:13:19.980
Secondly, in a republic, as contrasted to a direct democracy, people vote not for specific

122
00:13:19.980 --> 00:13:24.620
measures but for representatives in a package deal.

123
00:13:24.620 --> 00:13:30.000
The representatives then reek their will for a fixed length of time.

124
00:13:30.000 --> 00:13:36.120
In no legal sense, of course, are they truly representatives, since in a free society the

125
00:13:36.120 --> 00:13:43.540
The principle hires his agent or representative individually and can fire him at will.

126
00:13:43.540 --> 00:13:48.200
As the great anarchist political theorist and constitutional lawyer Lysander Spooner

127
00:13:48.200 --> 00:13:55.040
wrote, they, the elected government officials, are neither our servants, agents, attorneys,

128
00:13:55.040 --> 00:14:00.940
nor representatives, for we do not make ourselves responsible for their acts.

129
00:14:00.940 --> 00:14:06.600
If a man is my servant, agent or attorney, I necessarily make myself responsible for

130
00:14:06.600 --> 00:14:12.560
all his acts done within the limits of the power I have entrusted to him.

131
00:14:12.560 --> 00:14:18.720
If I have entrusted him as my agent with either absolute power, or any power at all, over

132
00:14:18.720 --> 00:14:24.780
the persons or properties of other men than myself, I thereby necessarily make myself

133
00:14:54.780 --> 00:14:57.780
are really the agents of nobody.

134
00:14:57.780 --> 00:15:05.220
Furthermore, even on its own terms, voting can hardly establish majority rule, much less

135
00:15:05.220 --> 00:15:08.660
of voluntary endorsement of government.

136
00:15:08.660 --> 00:15:15.740
In the United States, for example, less than 40% of eligible voters bother to vote at all.

137
00:15:15.740 --> 00:15:21.980
Of these, 21% may vote for one candidate and 19% for another.

138
00:15:21.980 --> 00:15:29.980
21% scarcely establishes even majority rule, much less the voluntary consent of all.

139
00:15:29.980 --> 00:15:36.040
In one sense, and quite apart from democracy or voting, the majority always supports any

140
00:15:36.040 --> 00:15:37.680
existing government.

141
00:15:37.680 --> 00:15:40.460
This will be treated below.

142
00:15:40.460 --> 00:15:46.040
And finally, how is it that taxes are levied on one and all, regardless of whether they

143
00:15:46.040 --> 00:15:57.720
How can either non-voting or voting for the loser indicate any sort of endorsement of

144
00:15:57.720 --> 00:16:01.400
the actions of the elected government?

145
00:16:01.400 --> 00:16:07.360
Neither does voting establish any sort of voluntary consent even by the voters themselves

146
00:16:07.360 --> 00:16:09.360
to the government.

147
00:16:09.360 --> 00:16:15.440
As Spooner trenchantly pointed out, in truth, in the case of individuals, their actual voting

148
00:16:15.440 --> 00:16:19.080
Banking is not to be taken as proof of consent.

149
00:16:19.080 --> 00:16:25.120
On the contrary, it is to be considered that without his consent ever having been asked,

150
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:31.720
a man finds himself environed by a government that he cannot resist, a government that forces

151
00:16:31.720 --> 00:16:37.800
him to pay money, render service, and forego the exercise of many of his natural rights

152
00:16:37.800 --> 00:16:41.000
under peril of weighty punishments.

153
00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:46.800
He sees, too, that other men practice this tyranny over him by the use of the ballot.

154
00:16:46.800 --> 00:16:52.480
He sees further that, if he will but use the ballot himself, he has some chance of relieving

155
00:16:52.480 --> 00:16:58.140
himself from this tyranny of others by subjecting them to his own.

156
00:16:58.140 --> 00:17:04.800
In short, he finds himself, without his consent, so situated that, if he uses the ballot, he

157
00:17:04.800 --> 00:17:06.640
may become a master.

158
00:17:06.640 --> 00:17:10.300
If he does not use it, he must become a slave.

159
00:17:10.300 --> 00:17:14.620
And he has no other alternative than these two.

160
00:17:14.620 --> 00:17:18.020
In self-defense, he attempts the former.

161
00:17:18.020 --> 00:17:22.700
His case is analogous to that of a man who has been forced into battle, where he must

162
00:17:22.700 --> 00:17:26.780
either kill others or be killed himself.

163
00:17:26.780 --> 00:17:32.340
Because to save his own life in battle, a man attempts to take the lives of his opponents,

164
00:17:32.340 --> 00:17:37.220
it is not to be inferred that the battle is one of his own choosing.

165
00:17:37.220 --> 00:17:42.700
are in contests with the ballot, which is a mere substitute for a bullet, because as

166
00:17:42.700 --> 00:17:48.820
his only chance of self-preservation a man uses a ballot, is it to be inferred that the

167
00:17:48.820 --> 00:17:55.740
contest is one into which he voluntarily entered, that he voluntarily set up all his own natural

168
00:17:55.740 --> 00:18:04.460
rights as a stake against those of others, to be lost or won by the mere power of numbers.

169
00:18:04.460 --> 00:18:09.500
If the most miserable of men, under the most oppressive government in the world, if allowed

170
00:18:09.500 --> 00:18:15.460
the ballot, would use it, if they could see any chance of ameliorating their condition.

171
00:18:15.460 --> 00:18:20.220
But it would not, therefore, be a legitimate inference that the government itself that

172
00:18:20.220 --> 00:18:28.300
crushes them, was one which they had voluntarily set up, or even consented to.

173
00:18:28.300 --> 00:18:34.340
If then, taxation is compulsory, and is therefore indistinguishable from theft, it follows

174
00:18:34.340 --> 00:18:45.340
It says that the state, which subsists on taxation, is a vast criminal organization, far more formidable and successful than any private mafia in history.

175
00:18:45.340 --> 00:18:53.340
Furthermore, it should be considered criminal not only according to the theory of crime and property rights as set forth in this book,

176
00:18:53.340 --> 00:19:01.340
but even according to the common apprehension of mankind, which always considers theft to be a crime.

177
00:19:01.340 --> 00:19:14.340
As we have seen above, the 19th century German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer put the matter succinctly when he pointed out that there are two and only two ways of attaining wealth in society.

178
00:19:14.340 --> 00:19:26.340
A. By production and voluntary exchange with others, the method of the free market, and B. By violent expropriation of the wealth produced by others.

179
00:19:26.340 --> 00:19:40.340
The latter is the method of violence and theft. The former benefits all parties involved. The latter, parasitically, benefits the looting group or class at the expense of the looted.

180
00:19:40.340 --> 00:19:50.340
Oppenheimer trenchantly termed the former method of obtaining wealth the economic means, and the latter, the political means.

181
00:19:50.340 --> 00:19:58.340
Oppenheimer then went on brilliantly to define the state as the organization of the political means.

182
00:19:58.340 --> 00:20:08.340
Nowhere has the essence of the state as a criminal organization been put as forcefully or as brilliantly as in this passage from Lysander Spooner.

183
00:20:08.340 --> 00:20:14.940
It is true that the theory of our constitution is that all taxes are paid voluntarily, that

184
00:20:14.940 --> 00:20:20.160
our government is a mutual insurance company voluntarily entered into by the people with

185
00:20:20.160 --> 00:20:22.060
each other.

186
00:20:22.060 --> 00:20:27.160
But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact.

187
00:20:27.160 --> 00:20:33.660
The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man, your money or your life.

188
00:20:33.660 --> 00:20:39.180
And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat.

189
00:20:39.180 --> 00:20:44.500
The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from

190
00:20:44.500 --> 00:20:50.100
the roadside, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets.

191
00:20:50.100 --> 00:20:55.300
But the robbery is nonetheless a robbery on that account, and it is far more dastardly

192
00:20:55.300 --> 00:20:57.340
and shameful.

193
00:20:57.340 --> 00:21:04.520
The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger and crime of his own act.

194
00:21:04.520 --> 00:21:09.540
He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to

195
00:21:09.540 --> 00:21:12.000
use it for your own benefit.

196
00:21:12.000 --> 00:21:15.220
He does not pretend to be anything but a robber.

197
00:21:15.220 --> 00:21:20.860
He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a protector, and that he takes

198
00:21:20.860 --> 00:21:34.860
He makes men's money against their will merely to enable him to protect those infatuated travelers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection.

199
00:21:34.860 --> 00:21:38.860
He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these.

200
00:21:38.860 --> 00:21:43.860
Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you as you wish him to do.

201
00:21:43.860 --> 00:21:49.060
He does not persist in following you on the road against your will, assuming to be your

202
00:21:49.060 --> 00:21:54.080
rightful sovereign on account of the protection he affords you.

203
00:21:54.080 --> 00:22:00.180
He does not keep protecting you by commanding you to bow down and serve him, by requiring

204
00:22:00.180 --> 00:22:05.740
you to do this and forbidding you to do that, by robbing you of more money as often as he

205
00:22:05.740 --> 00:22:11.600
finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so, and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor

206
00:22:11.600 --> 00:22:16.640
and an enemy to your country and shooting you down without mercy if you dispute his

207
00:22:16.640 --> 00:22:19.720
authority or resist his demands.

208
00:22:19.720 --> 00:22:24.160
He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such imposters and insults and villainies

209
00:22:24.160 --> 00:22:25.600
as these.

210
00:22:25.600 --> 00:22:31.220
In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or

211
00:22:31.220 --> 00:22:33.900
his slave.

212
00:22:33.900 --> 00:22:40.160
It is instructive to inquire why it is that the state, in contrast to the high women,

213
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:46.680
invariably surrounds itself with an ideology of legitimacy, why it must indulge in all

214
00:22:46.680 --> 00:22:50.240
the hypocrisies that Spooner outlines.

215
00:22:50.240 --> 00:22:55.800
The reason is that the highwayman is not a visible, permanent, legal or legitimate member

216
00:22:55.800 --> 00:23:00.460
of society, let alone a member with exalted status.

217
00:23:00.460 --> 00:23:05.100
He is always on the run from his victims or from the state itself.

218
00:23:05.100 --> 00:23:11.740
But the State, in contrast to a band of highwaymen, is not considered a criminal organization.

219
00:23:11.740 --> 00:23:18.220
On the contrary, its minions have generally held the positions of highest status in society.

220
00:23:18.220 --> 00:23:23.400
It is a status that allows the State to feed off its victims while making at least most

221
00:23:23.400 --> 00:23:29.780
of them support, or at least be resigned to, this exploitative process.

222
00:23:29.780 --> 00:23:35.340
In fact, it is precisely the function of the state's ideological minions and allies to

223
00:23:35.340 --> 00:23:41.640
explain to the public that the emperor does indeed have a fine set of clothes.

224
00:23:41.640 --> 00:23:47.660
In brief, the ideologists must explain that while theft by one or more persons or groups

225
00:23:47.660 --> 00:23:55.140
is bad and criminal, that when the state engages in such acts, it is not theft, but the legitimate

226
00:23:55.140 --> 00:23:59.540
and even sanctified act called taxation.

227
00:23:59.540 --> 00:24:05.620
The ideologists must explain that murder by one or more persons or groups is bad and must

228
00:24:05.620 --> 00:24:11.540
be punished, but that when the state kills it is not murder but an exalted act known

229
00:24:11.540 --> 00:24:16.380
as war or repression of internal subversion.

230
00:24:16.380 --> 00:24:22.160
They must explain that while kidnapping or slavery is bad and must be outlawed when done

231
00:24:22.160 --> 00:24:28.540
by private individuals or groups, that when the state commits such acts it is not kidnapping

232
00:24:28.540 --> 00:24:35.240
or Slavery, but conscription, an act necessary to the public wheel and even to the requirements

233
00:24:35.240 --> 00:24:37.880
of morality itself.

234
00:24:37.880 --> 00:24:43.540
The function of the statist ideologists is to weave the false set of emperor's clothes

235
00:24:43.540 --> 00:24:49.060
to convince the public of a massive double standard, that when the state commits the

236
00:24:49.060 --> 00:24:56.260
gravest of high crimes, it is really not doing so, but doing something else that is necessary,

237
00:24:56.260 --> 00:25:17.020
Ideology has always been vital to the continued existence of the state, as attested by the

238
00:25:17.020 --> 00:25:22.280
systematic use of ideology since the ancient oriental empires.

239
00:25:22.280 --> 00:25:27.820
The specific content of the ideology has, of course, changed over time, in accordance

240
00:25:27.820 --> 00:25:31.020
with changing conditions and cultures.

241
00:25:31.020 --> 00:25:37.560
In the Oriental despotisms, the emperor was often held by the Church to be himself divine.

242
00:25:37.560 --> 00:25:44.440
In our more secular age, the argument runs more to the public good and the general welfare.

243
00:25:44.440 --> 00:25:47.520
But the purpose is always the same.

244
00:25:47.520 --> 00:25:53.120
To convince the public that what the state does is not, as one might think, crime on

245
00:25:53.120 --> 00:26:00.380
a gigantic scale, but something necessary and vital that must be supported and obeyed.

246
00:26:00.380 --> 00:26:05.880
The reason that ideology is so vital to the state is that it always rests in essence on

247
00:26:05.880 --> 00:26:09.240
the support of the majority of the public.

248
00:26:09.240 --> 00:26:13.960
This support obtains whether the state is a democracy, a dictatorship or an absolute

249
00:26:13.960 --> 00:26:21.040
Monarchy, for the support rests in the willingness of the majority, not, to repeat, of every

250
00:26:21.040 --> 00:26:27.280
individual, to go along with the system, to pay the taxes, to go without much complaint

251
00:26:27.280 --> 00:26:32.800
to fight the state's wars, to obey the state's rules and decrees.

252
00:26:32.800 --> 00:26:38.400
This support need not be active enthusiasm to be effective, it can just as well be passive

253
00:26:38.400 --> 00:26:44.820
of Resignation, but support there must be, for if the bulk of the public were really

254
00:26:44.820 --> 00:26:49.840
convinced of the illegitimacy of the State, if it were convinced that the State is nothing

255
00:26:49.840 --> 00:26:55.600
more nor less than a bandit gang writ large, then the State would soon collapse to take

256
00:26:55.600 --> 00:27:01.640
on no more status or breadth of existence than another mafia gang.

257
00:27:01.640 --> 00:27:07.120
Hence the necessity of the State's employment of ideologists, and hence the necessity of

258
00:27:07.120 --> 00:27:20.240
The first modern political theorist who saw that all states rest on majority opinion was

259
00:27:20.240 --> 00:27:25.760
the 16th century libertarian French writer Etienne de la Butte.

260
00:27:25.760 --> 00:27:31.920
In his Discourse on Voluntary Servitude, de la Butte saw that the tyrannical state is

261
00:27:31.920 --> 00:27:38.120
always a minority of the population, and that therefore its continued despotic rule must

262
00:27:38.120 --> 00:27:44.120
rest on its legitimacy in the eyes of the exploited majority, on what would later come

263
00:27:44.120 --> 00:27:47.800
to be called the engineering of consent.

264
00:27:47.800 --> 00:27:53.200
Two hundred years later, David Hume, though scarcely a libertarian, set forth a similar

265
00:27:53.200 --> 00:27:54.200
analysis.

266
00:27:54.200 --> 00:28:00.040
Thus, as Hume stated, nothing appears more surprising than the easiness with which the

267
00:28:00.040 --> 00:28:06.280
The many are governed by the few, and the implicit submission with which men resign their

268
00:28:06.280 --> 00:28:10.360
own sentiments and passions to those of their rulers.

269
00:28:10.360 --> 00:28:15.560
When we inquire by what means this wonder is effected, we shall find that, as force

270
00:28:15.560 --> 00:28:20.680
is always on the side of the governed, the governors have nothing to support them but

271
00:28:20.680 --> 00:28:22.240
opinion.

272
00:28:22.240 --> 00:28:27.440
It is therefore on opinion that government is founded, and this maxim extends to the

273
00:28:27.440 --> 00:28:32.880
The Most Despotic and Most Military Governments

274
00:28:32.880 --> 00:28:38.960
The counter-argument that, with modern weapons, a minority force can permanently cow a hostile

275
00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:44.240
majority, ignores the fact that these weapons can be held by the majority, and that the

276
00:28:44.240 --> 00:28:49.520
armed force of the minority can mutiny or defect to the side of the populace.

277
00:28:49.520 --> 00:28:56.320
Hence, the permanent need for persuasive ideology has always led the state to bring into its

278
00:28:56.320 --> 00:29:02.280
This rubric, the nation's opinion-molding intellectuals. In former days, the intellectuals

279
00:29:02.280 --> 00:29:08.080
were invariably the priests, and hence, as we have pointed out, the age-old alliance

280
00:29:08.080 --> 00:29:16.080
between church and state, throne and altar. Nowadays, scientific and value-free economists

281
00:29:16.080 --> 00:29:21.920
and national security managers, among others, perform a similar ideological function in

282
00:29:21.920 --> 00:29:25.120
on behalf of state power.

283
00:29:25.120 --> 00:29:30.080
Particularly important in the modern world, now that an established church is often no

284
00:29:30.080 --> 00:29:36.680
longer feasible, is for the state to assume control over education and thereby to mold

285
00:29:36.680 --> 00:29:39.240
the minds of its subjects.

286
00:29:39.240 --> 00:29:44.280
In addition to influencing the universities through all manner of financial subventions

287
00:29:44.280 --> 00:29:49.800
and through state-owned universities directly, the state controls education on the lower

288
00:29:49.800 --> 00:29:55.080
levels through the universal institutions of the public school, through certification

289
00:29:55.080 --> 00:30:00.600
requirements for private schools, and through compulsory attendance laws.

290
00:30:00.600 --> 00:30:06.180
Add to this a virtually total control over radio and television, either through outright

291
00:30:06.180 --> 00:30:11.880
state ownership, as in most countries, or, as in the United States, by the nationalization

292
00:30:11.880 --> 00:30:17.300
of the airwaves and by the power of a Federal Commission to license the right of stations

293
00:30:17.300 --> 00:30:20.340
to use those frequencies and channels.

294
00:30:20.340 --> 00:30:27.780
Thus, the state by its very nature must violate the generally accepted moral laws to which

295
00:30:27.780 --> 00:30:30.340
most people adhere.

296
00:30:30.340 --> 00:30:35.580
Most people are agreed on the injustice and criminality of murder and theft.

297
00:30:35.580 --> 00:30:40.900
The customs, rules and laws of all societies condemn these actions.

298
00:30:40.900 --> 00:30:47.820
The state, then, is always in a vulnerable position, despite its seeming age-old might.

299
00:30:47.820 --> 00:30:53.500
What particularly needs to be done is to enlighten the public on the state's true nature, so

300
00:30:53.500 --> 00:30:58.760
that they can see that the state habitually violates the generally accepted injunctions

301
00:30:58.760 --> 00:31:04.300
against robbery and murder, that the state is the necessary violator of the commonly

302
00:31:04.300 --> 00:31:08.640
accepted moral and criminal law.

303
00:31:08.640 --> 00:31:14.160
We have seen clearly why the state needs the intellectuals, but why do the intellectuals

304
00:31:14.160 --> 00:31:16.200
need the state?

305
00:31:16.200 --> 00:31:21.940
Put simply, it is because intellectuals, whose services are often not very intensively desired

306
00:31:21.940 --> 00:31:27.560
by the mass of consumers, can find a more secure market for their abilities in the arms

307
00:31:27.560 --> 00:31:29.120
of the state.

308
00:31:29.120 --> 00:31:34.320
The state can provide them with a power, status and wealth which they often cannot obtain

309
00:31:34.320 --> 00:31:37.000
in voluntary exchange.

310
00:31:37.000 --> 00:31:42.100
For centuries, many, though of course not all, intellectuals have sought the goal of

311
00:31:42.100 --> 00:31:48.300
power, the realization of the Platonic ideal of the philosopher-king.

312
00:31:48.300 --> 00:31:52.980
Consider for example the cry from the heart by the distinguished Marxist scholar, Professor

313
00:31:52.980 --> 00:31:58.840
Needham, in protest against the assiduous critique by Carl Wittfogel of the alliance

314
00:31:58.840 --> 00:32:03.980
of state and intellectuals in Oriental despotisms.

315
00:32:03.980 --> 00:32:08.820
The civilization which Professor Wittfogel is so bitterly attacking was one which could

316
00:32:08.820 --> 00:32:12.900
make poets and scholars into officials.

317
00:32:12.900 --> 00:32:18.700
Needham adds that the successive Chinese emperors were served in all ages by a great company

318
00:32:18.700 --> 00:32:22.820
of profoundly humane and disinterested scholars.

319
00:32:22.820 --> 00:32:28.300
Presumably for Professor Needham this is enough to justify the grinding despotisms of the

320
00:32:28.300 --> 00:32:30.100
ancient Orient.

321
00:32:30.100 --> 00:32:35.340
But we need not go back as far as the ancient Orient, or even as far as the proclaimed

322
00:32:35.340 --> 00:32:40.800
goal of the professors at the University of Berlin in the 19th century, to form themselves

323
00:32:40.800 --> 00:32:45.420
into the intellectual bodyguard of the House of Hohenzollern.

324
00:32:45.420 --> 00:32:51.300
In contemporary America, we have the eminent political scientist, Professor Richard Neustadt,

325
00:32:51.300 --> 00:32:56.660
hailing the President as the sole crown-like symbol of the Union.

326
00:32:56.660 --> 00:33:02.000
We have National Security Manager Townsend Hoops writing that, under our system, the

327
00:33:02.000 --> 00:33:07.660
people can look only to the President to define the nature of our foreign policy problem and

328
00:33:07.660 --> 00:33:13.700
the national programs and sacrifices required to meet it with effectiveness.

329
00:33:13.700 --> 00:33:19.040
And in response, we have Richard Nixon, on the eve of his election as President, defining

330
00:33:19.040 --> 00:33:21.220
his role as follows.

331
00:33:21.220 --> 00:33:29.220
He, the President, must articulate the nation's values, define its goals, and marshal its will.

332
00:33:29.220 --> 00:33:35.220
Nixon's conception of his role is hauntingly similar to the scholar Ernst Huber's articulation,

333
00:33:35.220 --> 00:33:41.220
in the Germany of the 1930s, of the constitutional law of the greater German Reich.

334
00:33:41.220 --> 00:33:46.220
Huber wrote that the head of state sets up the great ends which are to be attained,

335
00:33:46.220 --> 00:34:16.220
Thus the State is a coercive criminal organization that subsists by a regularized large-scale system of taxation theft, and which gets away with it by engineering the support of the majority, not, again, of everyone, through state-owned, state-owned, state-owned, state-owned, state-owned, state-owned, state-owned, state-owned, state-owned,

336
00:34:16.220 --> 00:34:24.220
Securing an alliance with a group of opinion-moulding intellectuals, whom it rewards with a share in its power and pelf.

337
00:34:24.220 --> 00:34:29.220
But there is another vital aspect of the state that needs to be considered.

338
00:34:29.220 --> 00:34:34.220
There is one critical argument for the state that now comes into view.

339
00:34:34.220 --> 00:34:44.220
Namely, the implicit argument that the state apparatus really and properly owns the territorial area over which it claims jurisdiction.

340
00:34:44.220 --> 00:35:01.220
The state, in short, arrogates to itself a monopoly of force, of ultimate decision-making power over a given territorial area, larger or smaller depending on historical conditions and on how much it has been able to wrest from other states.

341
00:35:01.220 --> 00:35:11.220
If the state may be said to properly own its territory, then it is proper for it to make rules for anyone who presumes to live in that area.

342
00:35:11.220 --> 00:35:17.300
It can legitimately seize or control private property because there is no private property

343
00:35:17.300 --> 00:35:22.900
in its area, because it really owns the entire land surface.

344
00:35:22.900 --> 00:35:28.420
So long as the state permits its subjects to leave its territory, then, it can be said

345
00:35:28.420 --> 00:35:34.980
to act as does any other owner who sets down rules for people living on his property.

346
00:35:34.980 --> 00:35:40.460
This seems to be the only justification for the crude slogan, America, love it or leave

347
00:35:40.460 --> 00:35:47.460
as well as the enormous emphasis generally placed on an individual's right to emigrate from a country.

348
00:35:47.460 --> 00:35:54.460
In short, this theory makes the state, as well as the king in the Middle Ages, a feudal overlord,

349
00:35:54.460 --> 00:35:59.460
who at least theoretically owned all the land in his domain.

350
00:35:59.460 --> 00:36:07.460
The fact that new and unowned resources, whether virgin land or lakes, are invariably claimed as owned by the state,

351
00:36:07.460 --> 00:36:14.500
by the State, its public domain, is an expression of this implicit theory.

352
00:36:14.500 --> 00:36:19.860
But our homesteading theory outlined above suffices to demolish any such pretensions

353
00:36:19.860 --> 00:36:22.300
by the State apparatus.

354
00:36:22.300 --> 00:36:27.700
For by what earthly right do the criminals of the State lay claim to the ownership of

355
00:36:27.700 --> 00:36:29.580
its land area?

356
00:36:29.580 --> 00:36:35.180
It is bad enough that they have seized control of ultimate decision-making for that area.

357
00:36:35.180 --> 00:36:42.080
What criterion can possibly give them the rightful ownership of the entire territory?

358
00:36:42.080 --> 00:36:48.060
The State may therefore be defined as that organization which possesses either or both,

359
00:36:48.060 --> 00:36:53.160
in actual fact almost always both, of the following characteristics.

360
00:36:53.160 --> 00:36:58.920
A. It acquires its revenue by physical coercion, taxation.

361
00:36:58.920 --> 00:37:04.840
And B. It achieves a compulsory monopoly of force and of ultimate decision-making power

362
00:37:04.840 --> 00:37:11.640
over a given territorial area. Both of these essential activities of the state necessarily

363
00:37:11.640 --> 00:37:17.240
constitute criminal aggression and depredation of the just rights of private property of

364
00:37:17.240 --> 00:37:23.920
its subjects, including self-ownership. For the first constitutes and establishes theft

365
00:37:23.920 --> 00:37:30.480
on a grand scale, while the second prohibits the free competition of defense and decision-making

366
00:37:30.480 --> 00:37:36.720
Agencies Within a Given Territorial Area, Prohibiting the Voluntary Purchase and Sale

367
00:37:36.720 --> 00:37:40.280
of Defense and Judicial Services.

368
00:37:40.280 --> 00:37:46.400
Given territorial area in this context of course implicitly means beyond the area of

369
00:37:46.400 --> 00:37:49.200
each property owner's just property.

370
00:37:49.200 --> 00:37:55.000
Obviously, in a free society, Smith has the ultimate decision-making power over his own

371
00:37:55.000 --> 00:37:59.400
just property, Jones over his, etc.

372
00:37:59.400 --> 00:38:05.500
The state or government claims and exercises a compulsory monopoly of defense and ultimate

373
00:38:05.500 --> 00:38:11.800
decision-making over an area larger than an individual's justly acquired property.

374
00:38:11.800 --> 00:38:18.760
Smith, Jones, etc. are thereby prohibited by the government from having nothing to do

375
00:38:18.760 --> 00:38:25.600
with that government and from making their own defense contracts with a competing agency.

376
00:38:25.600 --> 00:38:31.960
I am indebted to Professor Sidney Morgan Besser for raising this point.

377
00:38:31.960 --> 00:38:37.000
Hence the justice of the vivid critique of the State by the libertarian theorist Albert

378
00:38:37.000 --> 00:38:38.920
J. Nock.

379
00:38:38.920 --> 00:38:45.480
The State claims and exercises the monopoly of crime in a given territorial area.

380
00:38:45.480 --> 00:38:51.000
It forbids private murder, but itself organizes murder on a colossal scale.

381
00:38:51.000 --> 00:38:56.600
It punishes private theft, but itself lays unscrupulous hands on anything it wants, whether

382
00:38:56.600 --> 00:39:00.140
the property of citizen or alien.

383
00:39:00.140 --> 00:39:05.520
It must be emphasized that the State does not merely use coercion to acquire its own

384
00:39:05.520 --> 00:39:11.580
revenue, to hire propagandists to advance its power, and to arrogate to itself and to

385
00:39:11.580 --> 00:39:18.200
enforce a compulsory monopoly of such vital services as police protection, firefighting,

386
00:39:18.200 --> 00:39:21.080
Transportation and Postal Service.

387
00:39:21.080 --> 00:39:26.340
For the State does many other things as well, none of which can in any sense be said to

388
00:39:26.340 --> 00:39:29.080
serve the consuming public.

389
00:39:29.080 --> 00:39:34.680
It uses its monopoly of force to achieve, as Nock puts it, a monopoly of crime, to

390
00:39:34.680 --> 00:39:39.480
control, regulate and coerce its hapless subjects.

391
00:39:39.480 --> 00:39:46.000
Often it pushes its way into controlling the morality and the very daily lives of its subjects.

392
00:39:46.000 --> 00:39:51.840
The State uses its coerced revenue not merely to monopolize and provide genuine services

393
00:39:51.840 --> 00:39:58.160
inefficiently to the public, but also to build up its own power at the expense of its exploited

394
00:39:58.160 --> 00:40:04.320
and harassed subjects, to redistribute income and wealth from the public to itself and to

395
00:40:04.320 --> 00:40:11.300
its allies, and to control, command and coerce the inhabitants of its territory.

396
00:40:11.300 --> 00:40:18.300
In a truly free society, a society where individual rights of person and property are maintained,

397
00:40:18.300 --> 00:40:22.700
the state then would necessarily cease to exist.

398
00:40:22.700 --> 00:40:28.500
Its myriad of invasive and aggressive activities, its vast depredations on the rights of person

399
00:40:28.500 --> 00:40:31.720
and property, would then disappear.

400
00:40:31.720 --> 00:40:37.260
At the same time, those genuine services, which it does manage badly to perform, would

401
00:40:37.260 --> 00:40:44.460
should be thrown open to free competition and to voluntarily chosen payments by individual consumers.

402
00:40:44.460 --> 00:40:52.360
The grotesquerie of the typical conservative call for the government to enforce conservative definitions of morality,

403
00:40:52.360 --> 00:40:59.860
for example, by outlawing the alleged immorality of pornography, is therefore starkly revealed.

404
00:40:59.860 --> 00:41:06.020
Aside from other sound arguments against enforced morality, for example, that no action not

405
00:41:06.020 --> 00:41:12.420
freely chosen can be considered moral, it is surely grotesque to entrust the function

406
00:41:12.420 --> 00:41:18.240
of guardian of the public morality to the most extensive criminal and hence the most

407
00:41:18.240 --> 00:41:22.240
immoral group in society, the state.