WEBVTT

NOTE 3. Natural Law versus Positive Law

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
CHAPTER III NATURAL LAW VERSUS POSITIVE LAW

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:19.000
If, then, the natural law is discovered by reason from the basic inclinations of human nature—absolute, immutable, and of universal validity for all times and places—

3
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:29.000
it follows that the natural law provides an objective set of ethical norms by which to gauge human actions at any time or place.

4
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:44.000
The natural law is, in essence, a profoundly radical ethic, for it holds the existing status quo, which might grossly violate natural law, up to the unsparing and unyielding light of reason.

5
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:57.000
In the realm of politics or state action, the natural law presents man with a set of norms which may well be radically critical of existing positive law imposed by the state.

6
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:17.000
At this point, we need only stress that the very existence of a natural law discoverable by reason is a potentially powerful threat to the status quo and a standing reproach to the reign of blindly traditional custom or the arbitrary will of the state apparatus.

7
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:24.520
In fact, the legal principles of any society can be established in three alternate ways.

8
00:01:24.520 --> 00:01:29.800
A. By following the traditional custom of the tribe or community.

9
00:01:29.800 --> 00:01:37.600
B. By obeying the arbitrary ad hoc will of those who rule the state apparatus.

10
00:01:37.600 --> 00:01:43.480
Or C. By the use of man's reason in discovering the natural law.

11
00:01:43.480 --> 00:01:52.000
In short, by slavish conformity to custom, by arbitrary whim, or by use of man's reason.

12
00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:57.840
These are essentially the only possible ways for establishing positive law.

13
00:01:57.840 --> 00:02:02.560
Here we may simply affirm that the latter method is at once the most appropriate for

14
00:02:02.560 --> 00:02:11.560
for Man at His Most Nobly and Fully Human, and the Most Potentially Revolutionary, vis-à-vis any given status quo.

15
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:27.560
In our century, widespread ignorance of and scorn for the very existence of the natural law has limited people's advocacy of legal structures to A or B, or some blend of the two.

16
00:02:27.560 --> 00:02:33.060
This even holds for those who try to hew to a policy of individual liberty.

17
00:02:33.060 --> 00:02:42.560
Thus, there are those libertarians who would simply and uncritically adopt the common law, despite its many anti-libertarian flaws.

18
00:02:42.560 --> 00:02:53.560
Others, like Henry Hazlitt, would scrap all constitutional limitations on government to rely solely on the majority will as expressed by the legislature.

19
00:02:53.560 --> 00:03:07.560
Neither group seems to understand the concept of a structure of rational natural law to be used as a guidepost for shaping and reshaping whatever positive law may be in existence.

20
00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:22.560
While natural law theory has often been used erroneously in defense of the political status quo, its radical and revolutionary implications were brilliantly understood by the great Catholic libertarian historian, Lord Acton.

21
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:41.560
Acton saw clearly that the deep flaw in the ancient Greek, and their later followers' conception of natural law political philosophy, was to identify politics and morals, and then to place the supreme social-moral agent in the state.

22
00:03:41.560 --> 00:03:52.860
From Plato and Aristotle, the state's proclaimed supremacy was founded in their view that morality was undistinguished from religion and politics from morals,

23
00:03:52.860 --> 00:04:00.560
and in religion, morality and politics there was only one legislator and one authority.

24
00:04:00.560 --> 00:04:08.060
Acton added that the Stoics developed the correct non-state principles of natural law political philosophy,

25
00:04:08.060 --> 00:04:13.060
which were then revived in the modern period by Grotius and his followers.

26
00:04:13.060 --> 00:04:20.060
From that time it became possible to make politics a matter of principle and of conscience.

27
00:04:20.060 --> 00:04:25.060
The reaction of the state to this theoretical development was horror.

28
00:04:25.060 --> 00:04:31.060
When Cumberland and Pufendorf unfolded the true significance of Grotius' doctrine,

29
00:04:31.060 --> 00:04:36.060
every settled authority, every triumphant interest, recoiled aghast.

30
00:04:36.060 --> 00:04:50.060
It was manifest that all persons who had learned that political science is an affair of conscience rather than of might and expediency, might regard their adversaries as men without principle.

31
00:04:50.060 --> 00:05:02.060
Acton saw clearly that any set of objective moral principles rooted in the nature of man must inevitably come into conflict with custom and with positive law.

32
00:05:02.060 --> 00:05:08.460
To Acton, such an irrepressible conflict was an essential attribute of classical liberalism.

33
00:05:09.460 --> 00:05:14.460
Liberalism wishes for what ought to be, irrespective of what is.

34
00:05:15.460 --> 00:05:18.460
As Himmelfarb writes of Acton's philosophy,

35
00:05:18.460 --> 00:05:24.460
the past was allowed no authority except as it happened to conform to morality.

36
00:05:24.460 --> 00:05:28.060
To take seriously this liberal theory of history,

37
00:05:28.060 --> 00:05:38.060
To give precedence to what ought to be over what is, was, he admitted, virtually to install a revolution in permanence.

38
00:05:38.060 --> 00:05:50.060
And so for Acton, the individual, armed with natural law moral principles, is then in a firm position from which to criticize existing regimes and institutions,

39
00:05:50.060 --> 00:05:54.060
to hold them up to the strong and harsh light of reason.

40
00:05:54.060 --> 00:06:04.060
Even the far less politically oriented John Wild has trenchantly described the inherently radical nature of natural law theory.

41
00:06:04.060 --> 00:06:10.060
The philosophy of natural law defends the rational dignity of the human individual

42
00:06:10.060 --> 00:06:18.060
and his right and duty to criticize by word and deed any existent institution or social structure

43
00:06:18.060 --> 00:06:23.540
in terms of those universal moral principles which can be apprehended by the individual

44
00:06:23.540 --> 00:06:26.740
intellect alone.

45
00:06:26.740 --> 00:06:33.140
If the very idea of natural law is essentially radical and deeply critical of existing political

46
00:06:33.140 --> 00:06:40.460
institutions, then how has natural law become generally classified as conservative?

47
00:06:40.460 --> 00:06:45.800
Professor Parthimus considers natural law to be conservative because its principles

48
00:06:45.800 --> 00:06:52.920
Principles are universal, fixed and immutable, and hence are absolute principles of justice.

49
00:06:52.920 --> 00:06:59.040
Very true, but how does fixity of principle imply conservatism?

50
00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:05.200
On the contrary, the fact that natural law theorists derive from the very nature of man

51
00:07:05.200 --> 00:07:12.400
a fixed structure of law independent of time and place, or of habit or authority or group

52
00:07:12.400 --> 00:07:17.360
of Arms, makes that law a mighty force for radical change.

53
00:07:17.360 --> 00:07:23.400
The only exception would be the surely rare case where the positive law happens to coincide

54
00:07:23.400 --> 00:07:28.080
in every aspect with the natural law, as discerned by human reason.