WEBVTT

NOTE 15. The Theory Of Interest

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.000
Chapter 15 The Theory of Interest

2
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:13.000
An Unsettled Problem

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:21.000
After presenting his own theory of interest, which he complacently calls the General Theory of the Rate of Interest,

4
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:28.000
Keynes devotes a chapter to a criticism of what he calls the Classical Theory of the Rate of Interest,

5
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:31.000
together with an appendix to this chapter.

6
00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:39.000
It is a mark of the curious intellectual provincialism of Keynes in economics, as I have already pointed out,

7
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:49.000
that whenever he talks about the classical theory, he seems to have in mind principally or solely Alfred Marshall and A. C. Pigot,

8
00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:53.000
though with occasional sarcastic side swipes at Ricardo.

9
00:00:53.000 --> 00:01:02.000
This is not merely an Anglo-centric, but a Cantabrigia-centric view of economic history and theory.

10
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:10.000
But Keynes does make occasional references to other writers, and in a sense, he deals impartially with all.

11
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:17.000
He distorts or caricatures or quotes misleading excerpts from the views he is ostensibly presenting.

12
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:28.000
Unfortunately, and despite the title and assumptions of Keynes's chapter 14, there simply is no accepted, classical theory of the rate of interest.

13
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:36.000
As Gottfried Haberler has written, Prosperity and Depression, 1941, page 195,

14
00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:54.000
The theory of interest has for a long time been a weak spot in the science of economics and the explanation and determination of the interest rate still gives rise to more disagreement among economists than any other branch of general economic theory.

15
00:01:54.000 --> 00:02:09.000
Though great progress has been made in the last 80 years or so, principally beginning with Jevons and Boehm-Bawerk, almost every writer on interest has his own theory, or at least his own special emphasis.

16
00:02:09.000 --> 00:02:15.000
But we may divide current theories of interest into three broad categories.

17
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:18.000
1. Productivity Theories

18
00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:21.000
2. Time Preference Theories

19
00:02:21.000 --> 00:02:27.000
and 3. Theories which combine productivity and time preference concepts.

20
00:02:27.000 --> 00:02:35.000
A fourth category, which, however, overlaps on all of these, consists of productivity, time preference,

21
00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:43.000
or combined theories that also take account of disturbances caused by monetary factors.

22
00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:53.000
But the kind of purely monetary theory represented by Keynes is pre-classical, mercantilistic, and man-in-the-street economics.

23
00:02:53.000 --> 00:02:59.000
It is clear that if any of these three types of orthodox interest theory is right,

24
00:02:59.000 --> 00:03:05.800
If we are to lump under orthodox as Keynes does, whatever is non-Keynesian, Keynes's

25
00:03:05.800 --> 00:03:09.440
purely monetary theory must be wrong.

26
00:03:09.440 --> 00:03:14.880
It is, of course, not a sufficient criticism of Keynes's theory to point this out.

27
00:03:14.880 --> 00:03:20.680
We should show that at least one of these orthodox theories is, in fact, correct.

28
00:03:20.680 --> 00:03:25.160
This forces us into a digression on positive theory.

29
00:03:25.160 --> 00:03:31.560
While I dislike to rush into territory where geniuses and angels have stumbled, I am afraid

30
00:03:31.560 --> 00:03:33.600
we have no choice.

31
00:03:33.600 --> 00:03:40.140
But we shall venture into the field by examining in turn each of three principal types of real

32
00:03:40.140 --> 00:03:46.720
interest theories, as expounded by their ablest spokesmen, and try to assess the strengths

33
00:03:46.720 --> 00:03:50.260
and weaknesses of each.

34
00:03:50.260 --> 00:03:53.260
Productivity Theories

35
00:03:53.260 --> 00:04:00.540
Let us begin by examining the Productivity Theory as expounded by Frank H. Knight.

36
00:04:00.540 --> 00:04:05.980
The peculiar feature of interest which makes it a special problem for economics is that

37
00:04:05.980 --> 00:04:11.980
it is not a rent paid directly for the use of property in the concrete sense, but is

38
00:04:11.980 --> 00:04:19.180
a repayment for the use of money, and as such takes the form of an abstract number, a ratio

39
00:04:19.180 --> 00:04:20.460
or Percentage.

40
00:04:20.460 --> 00:04:26.560
Yet, while the borrower obtains and repays a money loan, it is the use of goods which

41
00:04:26.560 --> 00:04:30.600
the borrower wants and gets by means of the loan.

42
00:04:30.600 --> 00:04:37.040
If loans for consumption are left out of account, as they may well be since under modern conditions

43
00:04:37.040 --> 00:04:42.680
their terms depend upon those of loans for productive purposes, the rental or yield

44
00:04:42.680 --> 00:04:48.920
of goods the use of which is obtained by means of the loan provides under normal conditions

45
00:04:48.920 --> 00:04:55.060
The Income Paid Out in the Form of Interest Competition tends to bring about equality

46
00:04:55.060 --> 00:04:58.020
of return from equal investments.

47
00:04:58.020 --> 00:05:03.620
The ratio of this equalized return to investment is the rate of interest.

48
00:05:03.620 --> 00:05:09.900
This at first blush is a very persuasive statement, but it fails to explain the central problem

49
00:05:09.900 --> 00:05:14.980
of the rate of interest, which can only be answered by a recognition of the existence

50
00:05:14.980 --> 00:05:17.100
of time preference.

51
00:05:17.100 --> 00:05:24.100
Professor Knight, in the article just quoted, goes on to discuss time preference theories.

52
00:05:24.100 --> 00:05:30.340
The competition of buyers and sellers, according to these theories, will set on income-yielding

53
00:05:30.340 --> 00:05:37.460
wealth a price which makes the amount demanded equal to the amount offered at that price.

54
00:05:37.460 --> 00:05:42.540
This price involves a uniform market rate of discounting future values.

55
00:05:42.540 --> 00:05:59.540
Thus, if at the equilibrium point it takes $1 in hand to buy $1.05, payable one year from date, it will also take $20 to buy a piece of property yielding a perpetual income of $1 a year.

56
00:05:59.540 --> 00:06:09.540
All other income bearers will be valued on the basis of the same arithmetical proportion, and the rate of interest will be 5%.

57
00:06:09.540 --> 00:06:15.940
The productivity theorists do not question the validity of the time-preference reasoning,

58
00:06:15.940 --> 00:06:21.140
but find that it lacks finality as an explanation under actual conditions.

59
00:06:21.140 --> 00:06:27.620
Knight's discussion, here and elsewhere, seems to me to admit the need of time preference,

60
00:06:27.620 --> 00:06:33.540
as at least part of the explanation of interest, but to give it at best a subordinate role

61
00:06:33.540 --> 00:06:36.580
and to admit it through the back door.

62
00:06:36.580 --> 00:06:42.980
At times he explicitly repudiates it, even while his general discussion implies it.

63
00:06:42.980 --> 00:06:49.700
Nonetheless, it seems to me that a productivity theory of interest can be defended, at least

64
00:06:49.700 --> 00:06:53.660
partly, against one frequent criticism.

65
00:06:53.660 --> 00:06:57.980
This is made by Keynes in the general theory.

66
00:06:57.980 --> 00:07:02.840
Nor are those theories more successful which attempt to make the rate of interest depend

67
00:07:02.840 --> 00:07:06.140
on the marginal efficiency of capital.

68
00:07:06.140 --> 00:07:10.940
It is true that, in equilibrium, the rate of interest will be equal to the marginal

69
00:07:10.940 --> 00:07:17.220
efficiency of capital, since it will be profitable to increase or decrease the current scale

70
00:07:17.220 --> 00:07:21.440
of investment until the point of equality has been reached.

71
00:07:21.440 --> 00:07:26.380
But to make this into a theory of the rate of interest, or to derive the rate of interest

72
00:07:26.380 --> 00:07:32.620
from it, involves a circular argument, as Marshall discovered, after he had got halfway

73
00:07:32.620 --> 00:07:37.260
The way into giving an account of the rate of interest along these lines.

74
00:07:37.260 --> 00:07:43.460
For the marginal efficiency of capital partly depends on the scale of current investment,

75
00:07:43.460 --> 00:07:49.340
and we must already know the rate of interest before we can calculate what this scale will

76
00:07:49.340 --> 00:07:50.580
be.

77
00:07:50.580 --> 00:07:56.820
The significant conclusion is that the output of new investment will be pushed to the point

78
00:07:56.820 --> 00:08:02.540
at which the marginal efficiency of capital becomes equal to the rate of interest, and

79
00:08:02.540 --> 00:08:18.540
What the schedule of the marginal efficiency of capital tells us is not what the rate of interest is, but the point to which the output of new investment will be pushed, given the rate of interest, page 184.

80
00:08:18.540 --> 00:08:21.540
There are two errors in this criticism.

81
00:08:21.540 --> 00:08:27.540
The first, an error of phraseology, leads to the second, an error of logic.

82
00:08:27.540 --> 00:08:42.540
If Keynes is really speaking about the marginal efficiency of capital, the actual phrase he uses, then he is speaking only of a point on the curve or schedule of the efficiency or yield of capital.

83
00:08:42.540 --> 00:08:51.540
If the marginal efficiency of capital at any moment is conceived, as with any precise usage of terms it should be,

84
00:08:51.540 --> 00:09:00.540
merely as a point on the curve of the yield of capital, then the argument that Keynes is criticizing is indeed circular,

85
00:09:00.540 --> 00:09:04.540
and Keynes's criticism is altogether valid.

86
00:09:04.540 --> 00:09:10.540
But we have seen that Keynes uses his key terms very loosely and carelessly.

87
00:09:10.540 --> 00:09:29.540
Most of the time, when he refers to the marginal efficiency of capital, he does not mean the marginal efficiency of capital at all, but merely the efficiency of capital, or, technically, the curve of the yield of capital and quantity demanded.

88
00:09:29.540 --> 00:09:40.540
In fact, as we have already had occasion to note, Keynes uses the marginal efficiency of capital as a synonym for the investment demand schedule.

89
00:09:40.540 --> 00:09:51.540
We shall call this the investment demand schedule, or alternatively, the schedule of the marginal efficiency of capital, page 136.

90
00:09:51.540 --> 00:10:13.540
Now if, in the passage I have quoted above from page 184 of the General Theory, we substitute, except in the second sentence, the phrase investment demand schedule for marginal efficiency of capital, we find that the argument that Keynes is criticizing is not circular, but merely incomplete.

91
00:10:13.540 --> 00:10:22.540
For the market rate of interest would then be at the point at which the investment demand schedule, or curve, intersected the savings supply curve.

92
00:10:22.540 --> 00:10:33.540
The investment demand schedule would then influence, though not by itself determined, the rate of interest, just as would the supply of savings.

93
00:10:33.540 --> 00:10:38.540
Keynes was led into his error by following his master Marshall.

94
00:10:38.540 --> 00:11:02.540
On pages 139 through 140, he quotes a passage from Marshall's Principles, 6th edition, pages 519 through 520, in which Marshall tries to show, and Keynes agrees, that attempting to arrive at a theory of interest by taking into account the productivity of capital goods is reasoning in a circle.

95
00:11:02.540 --> 00:11:11.540
But having accepted this reasoning as applied to the interest rate, Keynes draws back from applying it also, as Marshall does, to wages.

96
00:11:11.540 --> 00:11:24.540
But was he not wrong, asks Keynes in a worried footnote, page 140, in supposing that the marginal productivity theory of wages is equally circular?

97
00:11:24.540 --> 00:11:44.540
Marshall was, indeed, wrong in both cases. To argue that the expected yield from new investments, or the investment demand schedule, doesn't affect the interest rate, is like arguing that buyers don't affect the price of a commodity. They merely decide how much to buy at that price.

98
00:11:44.540 --> 00:11:51.420
Of course, we cannot determine the price of a commodity merely by knowing the demand curve.

99
00:11:51.420 --> 00:11:54.500
We must also know the supply curve.

100
00:11:54.500 --> 00:11:59.980
It is too often forgotten that the full name of the demand curve, which Wickstead called

101
00:11:59.980 --> 00:12:08.540
an elliptical, ambiguous and misleading phrase, is the curve of price and quantity demanded,

102
00:12:08.540 --> 00:12:14.820
As the full name of the supply curve is the curve of price and quantity offered.

103
00:12:14.820 --> 00:12:19.940
It is the point of intersection of these curves that determines price.

104
00:12:19.940 --> 00:12:26.620
Similarly, to anticipate, the investment demand curve, the savings supply curve and the interest

105
00:12:26.620 --> 00:12:28.980
rate are interdependent.

106
00:12:28.980 --> 00:12:34.800
The real weakness of the naive productivity theories of interest is that they misconceive

107
00:12:34.800 --> 00:12:38.500
the relationship between capital and yield.

108
00:12:38.500 --> 00:12:44.900
As Irving Fisher has put it, the statement that capital produces income is true only

109
00:12:44.900 --> 00:12:49.140
in the physical sense, it is not true in the value sense.

110
00:12:49.140 --> 00:12:54.660
That is to say, capital value does not produce income value.

111
00:12:54.660 --> 00:12:59.060
On the contrary, income value produces capital value.

112
00:12:59.060 --> 00:13:04.500
The orchard is the source of the apples, but the value of the apples is the source of the

113
00:13:04.500 --> 00:13:06.980
value of the orchard.

114
00:13:06.980 --> 00:13:13.700
If I may add another illustration, the hen produces the eggs, but the discounted value

115
00:13:13.700 --> 00:13:18.140
of the eggs produces the value of the hen.

116
00:13:18.140 --> 00:13:24.340
People in the investment market, in fact, talk habitually more as economists talk.

117
00:13:24.340 --> 00:13:30.700
They recognize that the capital value is determined by the yield, not the other way round.

118
00:13:30.700 --> 00:13:38.380
Let us say that a perpetual bond is issued at a par value of $1,000 and pays interest

119
00:13:38.380 --> 00:13:44.960
of $40 a year, when the going long-term interest rate is 4%.

120
00:13:44.960 --> 00:13:51.480
If the going long-term interest rate rises to 5%, the market price of the bond will fall

121
00:13:51.480 --> 00:13:53.900
to $800.

122
00:13:53.900 --> 00:14:00.300
If the going long-term interest rate falls to 3%, the market price of the bond will rise

123
00:14:00.300 --> 00:14:06.100
price to $1,333.

124
00:14:06.100 --> 00:14:10.100
Time Preference Theories

125
00:14:10.100 --> 00:14:16.500
But recognition of this relationship still does not solve the major problem of interest.

126
00:14:16.500 --> 00:14:23.040
This is to determine precisely why these particular relationships come to exist between capital

127
00:14:23.040 --> 00:14:25.580
values and yields.

128
00:14:25.580 --> 00:14:31.300
And in the solution of this problem, the concept of time preference is essential.

129
00:14:31.300 --> 00:14:33.820
As Mises phrases it,

130
00:14:33.820 --> 00:14:39.820
For the economist a problem is presented in the determination of prices for land, cattle

131
00:14:39.820 --> 00:14:41.980
and all the rest.

132
00:14:41.980 --> 00:14:48.100
If future goods were not bought and sold at a discount as against present goods, the buyer

133
00:14:48.100 --> 00:14:55.340
of land would have to pay a price which equals the sum of all future net revenue.

134
00:14:55.340 --> 00:15:01.180
If the future services which a piece of land can render were to be valued in the same way

135
00:15:01.180 --> 00:15:07.300
in which its present services are valued, no finite price would be high enough to impel

136
00:15:07.300 --> 00:15:09.740
its owner to sell it.

137
00:15:09.740 --> 00:15:14.660
Mises espouses a pure time preference theory.

138
00:15:14.660 --> 00:15:19.060
Time preference is a category inherent in every human action.

139
00:15:19.060 --> 00:15:25.460
Time preference manifests itself in the phenomenon of originary interest, i.e., the discount

140
00:15:25.460 --> 00:15:29.460
of future goods as against present goods.

141
00:15:29.460 --> 00:15:35.860
Originary interest is the ratio of the value assigned to want-satisfaction in the immediate

142
00:15:35.860 --> 00:15:42.940
future and the value assigned to want-satisfaction in remoter periods of the future.

143
00:15:42.940 --> 00:15:48.620
It manifests itself in the market economy in the discount of future goods as against

144
00:15:48.620 --> 00:15:50.320
present goods.

145
00:15:50.320 --> 00:15:55.760
It is a ratio of commodity prices, not a price in itself.

146
00:15:55.760 --> 00:16:03.340
There prevails a tendency toward the equalization of this ratio for all commodities.

147
00:16:03.340 --> 00:16:08.640
Originary interest is not a price determined on the market by the interplay of the demand

148
00:16:08.640 --> 00:16:15.760
Demand for and the supply of capital or capital goods, its height does not depend on the extent

149
00:16:15.760 --> 00:16:21.980
of this demand and supply, it is rather the rate of originary interest that determines

150
00:16:21.980 --> 00:16:28.440
both the demand for and the supply of capital and capital goods.

151
00:16:28.440 --> 00:16:33.200
People do not save and accumulate because there is interest.

152
00:16:33.200 --> 00:16:38.520
Interest is neither the impetus to saving nor the reward or the compensation granted

153
00:16:38.520 --> 00:16:41.980
for Abstaining from Immediate Consumption.

154
00:16:41.980 --> 00:16:48.880
It is the ratio in the mutual valuation of present goods as against future goods.

155
00:16:48.880 --> 00:16:52.920
The loan market does not determine the rate of interest.

156
00:16:52.920 --> 00:16:59.740
It adjusts the rate of interest on loans to the rate of originary interest as manifested

157
00:16:59.740 --> 00:17:03.920
in the discount of future goods.

158
00:17:03.920 --> 00:17:10.240
This is so opposed to the layman's ordinary way of thinking and so opposed to what is

159
00:17:10.240 --> 00:17:16.880
found in the great majority of economic textbooks that most readers will find the theory difficult

160
00:17:16.880 --> 00:17:18.680
to assimilate.

161
00:17:18.680 --> 00:17:24.920
But it should be obvious that interest is peculiarly concerned with time.

162
00:17:24.920 --> 00:17:30.960
Contrary to Keynes's belief, it is at least as much through the rate of interest as through

163
00:17:30.960 --> 00:17:38.080
Through the Anticipated Yield of New Capital Goods that The Expectation of the Future Influences

164
00:17:38.080 --> 00:17:42.080
the Present, page 145.

165
00:17:42.080 --> 00:17:47.900
The rate of interest is involved in every price in which the time element enters.

166
00:17:47.900 --> 00:17:52.640
The price of a house is the discounted value of its future income.

167
00:17:52.640 --> 00:17:58.400
As Irving Fisher has insisted, the rate of interest is the most pervasive price in the

168
00:17:58.400 --> 00:18:00.740
whole price structure.

169
00:18:00.740 --> 00:18:11.740
In fact, it is almost super-erogatory to say that time preference, or if we prefer that term, time discount, causes the rate of interest.

170
00:18:11.740 --> 00:18:18.740
Time preference, or time discount, is the rate of interest, looked at from another side.

171
00:18:18.740 --> 00:18:35.740
If I borrow $100 for one year at 5%, this is another way of saying that I value $100 now more than $105, which I then expect to surrender one year from now.

172
00:18:35.740 --> 00:18:45.740
The interest rate may be stated not only as an annual monetary payment, which is a certain percentage of a loaned capital sum,

173
00:18:45.740 --> 00:18:51.060
but as a ratio between present and future capital sums.

174
00:18:51.060 --> 00:18:57.980
If people valued future goods as much as present goods, one would have to pay an infinite sum

175
00:18:57.980 --> 00:19:02.740
for the right to receive $5 a year perpetually.

176
00:19:02.740 --> 00:19:09.860
But as a matter of fact, if the current long-term interest rate is 5%, one can buy the right

177
00:19:09.860 --> 00:19:16.420
to an infinite series of $5 a year for only $100.

178
00:19:16.420 --> 00:19:20.740
Insurance companies are quite used to looking at the question of interest, not in terms

179
00:19:20.740 --> 00:19:26.940
of an annual rate of payment, but as a ratio between present and future sums.

180
00:19:26.940 --> 00:19:36.340
Assuming a current long-term interest rate of 5%, one can pay only $61.39 for the right

181
00:19:36.340 --> 00:20:06.140
A simple and striking form of the time preference theory is put forward by the Mexican economist

182
00:20:06.140 --> 00:20:12.140
Faustino Balve If the entrepreneur obtains money, he is

183
00:20:12.140 --> 00:20:17.340
able to have today what he could otherwise not have until tomorrow.

184
00:20:17.340 --> 00:20:20.900
When he obtains a loan, he buys time.

185
00:20:20.900 --> 00:20:26.380
The interest that he pays is the price of the advantage he obtains from having at his

186
00:20:26.380 --> 00:20:31.700
disposal immediately what he would otherwise have to wait for.

187
00:20:31.700 --> 00:20:36.800
Of course, the borrower does not literally buy or borrow time.

188
00:20:36.800 --> 00:20:43.840
Each of us is allotted just 24 hours a day, and can neither buy nor sell any of it, at

189
00:20:43.840 --> 00:20:46.540
least not in its pure form.

190
00:20:46.540 --> 00:20:53.320
But the borrower does buy or hire the use of money, or of the assets that he can obtain

191
00:20:53.320 --> 00:20:55.380
with the money.

192
00:20:55.380 --> 00:21:02.700
And this use is, of course, use in time, the time for which the loan runs.

193
00:21:02.700 --> 00:21:08.280
Other names for interest, therefore, or for the thing for which interest is paid, might

194
00:21:08.280 --> 00:21:13.780
be time valuation, time use, or time usance.

195
00:21:13.780 --> 00:21:20.460
The old word usury, which originally meant merely interest, was therefore, until it got

196
00:21:20.460 --> 00:21:26.980
Not its evil connotation of exorbitant interest, etymologically more descriptive than its modern

197
00:21:26.980 --> 00:21:28.900
substitute.

198
00:21:28.900 --> 00:21:34.180
We are now in a better position to realize the fallacy of Keynes's rejection of the real

199
00:21:34.180 --> 00:21:37.620
factors that determine the interest rate.

200
00:21:37.620 --> 00:21:43.580
The borrower pays interest not merely for money, but usually for the assets he can obtain

201
00:21:43.580 --> 00:21:45.180
with money.

202
00:21:45.180 --> 00:21:50.680
He will therefore decide in accordance with the interest rate that he is asked for money,

203
00:21:50.680 --> 00:21:57.240
whether, say, he will rent a house or borrow money and buy a house and pay interest on

204
00:21:57.240 --> 00:21:59.400
the purchase price.

205
00:21:59.400 --> 00:22:05.440
The person from whom he borrows is also free to decide whether he will himself use his

206
00:22:05.440 --> 00:22:11.080
funds to buy a house or lend the money out at interest on a mortgage to somebody else

207
00:22:11.080 --> 00:22:13.360
who wants to buy a house.

208
00:22:13.360 --> 00:22:18.920
There will thus tend to be an equilibrium between interest rates and rents of houses

209
00:22:18.920 --> 00:22:25.760
minus depreciation and maintenance costs, or rather among the prices of houses, or rather

210
00:22:25.760 --> 00:22:31.840
among the price of houses, the level of net rents and the level of interest rates, and

211
00:22:31.840 --> 00:22:36.280
each will affect the other.

212
00:22:36.280 --> 00:22:39.760
Combined Interest Theories

213
00:22:39.760 --> 00:22:45.320
This brings us to the third type of interest theory, which seeks to combine productivity

214
00:22:45.320 --> 00:22:48.220
and time preference factors.

215
00:22:48.220 --> 00:22:54.700
This third type of theory is sometimes disparagingly called eclectic, but the adjective is not

216
00:22:54.700 --> 00:23:00.980
justified if it is meant to imply that those who hold it select a little from the productivity

217
00:23:00.980 --> 00:23:07.800
theories and a little from the time discount theories and fail to give any consistent explanation

218
00:23:07.800 --> 00:23:09.740
of Interest.

219
00:23:09.740 --> 00:23:15.060
On the contrary, this third type of theory is really a combined theory.

220
00:23:15.060 --> 00:23:21.320
It seeks to unify what is true in the productive theories with what is true in the time discount

221
00:23:21.320 --> 00:23:22.820
theories.

222
00:23:22.820 --> 00:23:28.140
In the same way as the price of a commodity is explained as the point of intersection

223
00:23:28.140 --> 00:23:34.120
of the supply curve and the demand curve, so one form of the combined theory explains

224
00:23:34.120 --> 00:23:39.600
stands the interest rate as the point of intersection of the curve of supply of savings with the

225
00:23:39.600 --> 00:23:42.440
curve of investment demand.

226
00:23:42.440 --> 00:23:48.660
The combined theory of the interest rate reached its highest and most elaborate expression in

227
00:23:48.660 --> 00:23:53.560
Irving Fisher's great work The Theory of Interest, 1930.

228
00:23:53.560 --> 00:24:00.560
Schumpeter called this a wonderful performance, the peak achievement, so far as perfection

229
00:24:00.560 --> 00:24:05.840
and within its own frame is concerned of the literature of interest.

230
00:24:05.840 --> 00:24:09.320
It is not hard to understand his enthusiasm.

231
00:24:09.320 --> 00:24:16.000
Few persons after reading Fischer can fail to find Keynes's discussion of interest superficial,

232
00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:19.640
haphazard and even amateurish.

233
00:24:19.640 --> 00:24:25.440
Fischer marshals the interplay of innumerable factors governing the rate of interest around

234
00:24:25.440 --> 00:24:32.500
Two Pillars of Explanation Impatience, Time Discount, and Investment Opportunity,

235
00:24:32.500 --> 00:24:38.780
the Rate of Return over Cost. F. A. Hayek has followed the Fisher Theory in its general

236
00:24:38.780 --> 00:24:44.860
outlines and explains the relation of the productivity factor to time preference as

237
00:24:44.860 --> 00:24:46.860
follows.

238
00:24:46.860 --> 00:24:52.740
The most widely held view is probably that, as in Marshall's Two Blades of the Scissors,

239
00:24:52.740 --> 00:24:59.620
The two factors, productivity and time preference, are so inseparately bound up with each other

240
00:24:59.620 --> 00:25:05.460
that it is impossible to say which has the greater and which the lesser influence.

241
00:25:05.460 --> 00:25:10.500
Our problem here is indeed no more than a special case of the problem to which Marshall

242
00:25:10.500 --> 00:25:16.340
applied that famous simile, the problem of the relative influence of utility and cost

243
00:25:16.340 --> 00:25:18.100
on value.

244
00:25:18.100 --> 00:25:24.080
The time valuation in our case corresponds, of course, to his utility, while the technical

245
00:25:24.080 --> 00:25:30.700
rate of transformation is an expression of the relative costs of the commodities or quantities

246
00:25:30.700 --> 00:25:34.100
of income at two moments of time.

247
00:25:34.100 --> 00:25:39.640
A complete positive theory of interest would have to take into account more factors than

248
00:25:39.640 --> 00:25:43.520
can be adequately discussed in a single chapter.

249
00:25:43.520 --> 00:25:49.040
If the market interest rate, for example, were in complete equilibrium, here are some

250
00:25:49.040 --> 00:25:51.840
of the things that would have to be equated.

251
00:25:51.840 --> 00:25:52.840
1.

252
00:25:52.840 --> 00:25:58.880
The supply of, with the demand for, capital, i.e. the supply of savings with the demand

253
00:25:58.880 --> 00:26:01.320
for investment 2.

254
00:26:01.320 --> 00:26:04.680
The price of capital instruments with their cost of production

255
00:26:04.680 --> 00:26:06.280
3.

256
00:26:06.280 --> 00:26:10.520
The income from capital goods with their price and their cost of production

257
00:26:10.520 --> 00:26:18.680
4, the marginal yield of capital with the rate of time discount, time preference, 5,

258
00:26:18.680 --> 00:26:25.080
the supply of loanable monetary funds with the demand for loanable funds.

259
00:26:25.080 --> 00:26:32.120
If we wished to illustrate these complex relationships graphically, we would produce an unintelligible

260
00:26:32.120 --> 00:26:40.280
maze of lines unless we were willing to use a set of diagrams rather than any single diagram.

261
00:26:40.280 --> 00:26:46.280
But the graph on the next page will illustrate one set of major relationships.

262
00:26:46.280 --> 00:26:50.640
The vertical line O-Y represents the interest rate.

263
00:26:50.640 --> 00:26:58.200
The horizontal line O-X represents the annual volume of savings or investment demand measured,

264
00:26:58.200 --> 00:27:00.680
say in billions of dollars.

265
00:27:00.680 --> 00:27:04.820
The curve I-D represents investment demand.

266
00:27:04.820 --> 00:27:09.480
The lower the interest rate, the greater the volume of investment demand.

267
00:27:09.480 --> 00:27:14.520
The higher the interest rate, the less the volume of investment demand.

268
00:27:14.520 --> 00:27:19.040
The curve SS represents the supply of savings.

269
00:27:19.040 --> 00:27:24.680
As drawn, it assumes some savings, even at a zero interest rate.

270
00:27:24.680 --> 00:27:30.240
The tendency of higher interest rates will be within limits to encourage a greater volume

271
00:27:30.240 --> 00:27:31.240
of savings.

272
00:27:31.240 --> 00:27:37.480
But the slope and shape of the savings curve is more debatable than that of the investment

273
00:27:37.480 --> 00:27:39.340
demand curve.

274
00:27:39.340 --> 00:27:44.840
Some economists would maintain that, within a wide range of interest rates, the savings

275
00:27:44.840 --> 00:27:50.440
curve should be vertical, in other words, that the volume of savings is not greatly

276
00:27:50.440 --> 00:27:56.380
influenced by interest rates. Other economists would say that higher interest rates, within

277
00:27:56.380 --> 00:28:02.820
a certain range, might encourage more savings, but that above a certain rate, the line should

278
00:28:02.820 --> 00:28:18.820
In other words, that very high interest rates may actually discourage saving because a high income from interest could be obtained from comparatively little saving.

279
00:28:18.820 --> 00:28:24.820
Though the rate of interest and the supply of savings will of course influence each other,

280
00:28:24.820 --> 00:28:37.820
We must remember that the supply of savings may be to a large extent independent of the interest rate, just as the interest rate may be to some extent independent of the supply of savings.

281
00:28:37.820 --> 00:28:43.820
There would be some savings as a reserve against contingencies at a zero interest rate.

282
00:28:43.820 --> 00:28:57.820
Perhaps the most important line on this chart, so far as the rate of interest is concerned, is not, in the long run, either ID or SS, but TD, the line of time discount.

283
00:28:57.820 --> 00:29:07.820
For it is this, in the long run, that may determine, rather than be determined by, both the supply of savings and the investment demand.

284
00:29:07.820 --> 00:29:15.820
In the diagram as drawn, the market rate of interest is in equilibrium with the time discount rate at 3.5%.

285
00:29:15.820 --> 00:29:22.820
The supply of savings and investment demand are also in equilibrium at that point.

286
00:29:22.820 --> 00:29:33.820
In any short-run period, we may think of these quantities as all interdependent, rather than as determined primarily by the time discount rate.

287
00:29:33.820 --> 00:29:53.820
Some readers may think that in the graph, the investment demand curve and the savings supply curve are together sufficient to determine the interest rate at their point of intersection, and that there is no need or legitimate place for a third line, whether it is called time discount or anything else.

288
00:29:53.820 --> 00:30:00.720
From the standpoint of the orthodox supply and demand curves, they are right.

289
00:30:00.720 --> 00:30:06.300
All diagrams of this sort are mere aids to thought, effort to visualize hypothetical

290
00:30:06.300 --> 00:30:10.220
relations never to be taken too literally.

291
00:30:10.220 --> 00:30:16.460
But a supply and demand analysis of the interest rate, or of any competitive price whatever,

292
00:30:16.460 --> 00:30:20.860
while correct, is superficial, a mere first step.

293
00:30:20.860 --> 00:30:26.980
The next step is always to inquire what the particular supply and demand forces are and

294
00:30:26.980 --> 00:30:30.700
what causes them to be what they are.

295
00:30:30.700 --> 00:30:35.320
Let us, as an illustration, take securities on the stock market.

296
00:30:35.320 --> 00:30:41.280
A stock, let us call it American Steel, is selling at 50 on the market.

297
00:30:41.280 --> 00:30:45.000
Why is it selling at that particular price?

298
00:30:45.000 --> 00:30:51.100
One answer, of course, is because supply and demand are at equilibrium at that price.

299
00:30:51.100 --> 00:30:54.000
But this only pushes the problem back a stage.

300
00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:57.140
It only poses it in another form.

301
00:30:57.140 --> 00:31:02.480
Why are supply and demand at equilibrium at that particular price?

302
00:31:02.480 --> 00:31:09.000
The answer is that the composite valuations put upon the stock by both buyers and sellers

303
00:31:09.000 --> 00:31:12.340
center for the moment at that point.

304
00:31:12.340 --> 00:31:17.780
Another way of putting this is that the valuations put on the stock by the marginal buyer and

305
00:31:17.780 --> 00:31:21.660
the marginal seller cross at that point.

306
00:31:21.660 --> 00:31:26.780
The last buyer must have valued the stock at more than $50.

307
00:31:26.780 --> 00:31:31.660
The last seller must have valued it at less than $50.

308
00:31:31.660 --> 00:31:37.880
Now let us say that American Steel closes at $50 on Monday, but that after the close

309
00:31:37.880 --> 00:31:42.680
Because of the market, the Board of Directors unexpectedly fails to declare the regular

310
00:31:42.680 --> 00:31:45.000
quarterly dividend.

311
00:31:45.000 --> 00:31:51.160
On Tuesday morning, the stock opens five points down, at 45.

312
00:31:51.160 --> 00:31:56.840
It can be said, of course, that American Steel has fallen because the supply of the stock

313
00:31:56.840 --> 00:32:00.500
has increased and the demand has diminished.

314
00:32:00.500 --> 00:32:06.600
But obviously, this is not the cause of the stock's fallen value, but the consequence.

315
00:32:06.600 --> 00:32:13.600
Physically, there are no more shares of American Steel outstanding on Tuesday than there were on Monday.

316
00:32:13.600 --> 00:32:22.600
Physically, the number of shares bought and the number of shares sold exactly equal each other on Tuesday as they did on Monday.

317
00:32:22.600 --> 00:32:33.600
There were no transactions in the stock market between the closing price of 50 on Monday and the suddenly lower opening price of 45 on Tuesday.

318
00:32:33.600 --> 00:32:38.680
The value of the stock has not fallen because of a change in the amount offered and the

319
00:32:38.680 --> 00:32:40.480
amount demanded.

320
00:32:40.480 --> 00:32:47.200
It is supply and demand that have changed because the value of the stock has fallen.

321
00:32:47.200 --> 00:32:53.400
Putting the matter in another way, the individual valuations set upon the stock by both sellers

322
00:32:53.400 --> 00:32:59.640
and buyers have fallen because of the, generally, unexpected passing of the previous regular

323
00:32:59.640 --> 00:33:01.200
dividend.

324
00:33:01.200 --> 00:33:06.780
The matter could, of course, be diagrammatically represented by the usual supply and demand

325
00:33:06.780 --> 00:33:12.060
curves crossing each other on Monday, with the demand curve moving to the left and the

326
00:33:12.060 --> 00:33:15.240
supply curve moving to the right on Tuesday.

327
00:33:15.240 --> 00:33:20.900
Actually, the supply curve in this case is merely the demand curve of the present holders

328
00:33:20.900 --> 00:33:22.600
of the stock.

329
00:33:22.600 --> 00:33:28.380
The situation could be represented by placing the valuations of both holders and potential

330
00:33:28.380 --> 00:33:54.540
These curves indicate relationships, but not necessarily causation.

331
00:33:54.540 --> 00:34:08.540
It is the lowered valuation of the stock in the minds of both buyers and sellers that causes the change in the supply and demand, rather than the change in amount supplied and amount demanded that causes the lowered valuation.

332
00:34:08.540 --> 00:34:31.540
In the same way, it is the composite time preference or time discount schedule in the minds of both borrowers and lenders that determines the rate of interest, the position of the investment demand curve, and the position of the supply of savings curve, rather than the supply and demand curves which determine the composite time preference point.

333
00:34:31.540 --> 00:34:48.540
It may help some readers, even though the parallel is misplaced, to think of normal time discount as the main factor governing the long-run normal rate of interest, rather than the ever-changing constellation of day-to-day market rates of interest,

334
00:34:48.540 --> 00:34:58.540
much in the same way as cost of production determines the relative normal prices of commodities, rather than their short-run market prices.

335
00:34:58.540 --> 00:35:13.540
In modern theory, of course, its costs of production does not determine the normal price of a commodity, but relative costs of production are part of the interdependent relationships among relative prices.

336
00:35:13.540 --> 00:35:16.040
As Wickstede has put it,

337
00:35:16.040 --> 00:35:23.040
One thing is not worth twice as much as another because it has twice as much labor in it,

338
00:35:23.040 --> 00:35:29.540
but producers have been willing to put twice as much labor into it because they know, expect,

339
00:35:29.540 --> 00:35:37.540
that when produced it will be worth twice as much, because it will be twice as useful or twice as much desired.

340
00:35:37.540 --> 00:35:43.660
The same sort of cause-and-effect amendment that Wicksteed makes in the classical theory

341
00:35:43.660 --> 00:35:50.260
of the relation of cost of production to price must also be made in Boehm-Bawerk's concept

342
00:35:50.260 --> 00:35:54.080
of the lengthening of the period of production.

343
00:35:54.080 --> 00:36:00.460
The fact that certain capital goods take longer to produce than others does not necessarily

344
00:36:00.460 --> 00:36:06.780
increase their value or productivity, but the expectation that certain capital goods

345
00:36:06.780 --> 00:36:13.460
will be more valuable or productive makes producers more willing to undertake a longer

346
00:36:13.460 --> 00:36:17.980
period of production if necessary to secure them.

347
00:36:17.980 --> 00:36:24.620
Each saver's and entrepreneur's time preference or time discount, including his estimate of

348
00:36:24.620 --> 00:36:30.200
the composite time preference or time discount of the community as a whole, will help to

349
00:36:30.200 --> 00:36:36.080
determine the current rate of savings or the current investment demand, but at any given

350
00:36:36.080 --> 00:36:43.080
Real Plus Monetary Factors

351
00:37:06.080 --> 00:37:14.080
It is true that the error of many of the classical economists was the opposite of this.

352
00:37:14.080 --> 00:37:29.080
In looking beyond the monetary veil at the real factors underneath, they forgot that both short-term and long-term loans consist, after all, in money and that both interest and principal are payable in money.

353
00:37:29.080 --> 00:37:44.080
This means that the theory of capital and interest must be understood in terms of money as well as in real terms, and that the monetary influences on the interest rate must be studied as well as the real influences.

354
00:37:44.080 --> 00:37:54.080
But Keynes made no new contribution when he jumped to the conclusion that therefore the interest rate is a purely monetary phenomenon.

355
00:37:54.080 --> 00:37:55.600
phenomenon.

356
00:37:55.600 --> 00:38:01.320
He merely returned to the pre-classical assumption of the mercantilists as he himself in his

357
00:38:01.320 --> 00:38:07.200
final chapters came to recognize, and to what has always been the assumption of the man

358
00:38:07.200 --> 00:38:09.540
in the street.

359
00:38:09.540 --> 00:38:15.280
Nor would he have been the first to discover, if he had discovered it, that both sets of

360
00:38:15.280 --> 00:38:23.400
influences, real and monetary, had to be recognized and reconciled in any complete theory of interest.

361
00:38:23.400 --> 00:38:27.960
That glory belongs to the Swedish economist Newt Wichsel.

362
00:38:27.960 --> 00:38:33.400
The great contribution which Wichsel made to interest theory was to reconcile the real

363
00:38:33.400 --> 00:38:40.520
theories of interest as developed by the classical economists and amended by Jevons and Bamboewerk

364
00:38:40.520 --> 00:38:45.980
with what actually happens to interest rates in the day-to-day money market as the banker

365
00:38:45.980 --> 00:38:49.920
or the security investor confronts it.

366
00:38:49.920 --> 00:38:53.680
The real factors act through the monetary factors.

367
00:38:53.680 --> 00:39:00.440
Wixell's really general theory of interest, real cum monetary, was carried further by

368
00:39:00.440 --> 00:39:07.440
Irving Fisher and receives its most mature exposition in the work of Ludwig von Mises.

369
00:39:07.440 --> 00:39:13.560
Wixell saw that it was both theoretically and actually possible for the central bank

370
00:39:13.560 --> 00:39:20.000
temporarily to depress interest rates by what are called open market operations.

371
00:39:20.000 --> 00:39:26.360
When the central bank wishes to reduce interest rates, it buys short-term and sometimes long-term

372
00:39:26.360 --> 00:39:31.880
obligations in the market and creates deposits or banknotes against them.

373
00:39:31.880 --> 00:39:38.000
By buying these short-term obligations and raising their capital value, it directly reduces

374
00:39:38.000 --> 00:39:51.000
This is the one germ of truth in Keynes's purely monetary theory of interest, and by creating bank deposits or even cash, it creates additional monetary funds to be thrown on the loan market, thus further tending to reduce interest rates.

375
00:39:51.000 --> 00:40:03.000
By doing this, in fact, the central bank could apparently reduce interest rates down to any figure where they were high enough to pay the mere operating costs of the banks.

376
00:40:03.000 --> 00:40:09.600
This is the one germ of truth in Keynes's purely monetary theory of interest rates.

377
00:40:09.600 --> 00:40:15.640
Open market operations are certainly practicable for bringing about temporary, which may sometimes

378
00:40:15.640 --> 00:40:20.660
mean rather prolonged, reductions in interest rates.

379
00:40:20.660 --> 00:40:25.800
But Wicksell, and more clearly than those who followed him, also recognized that the

380
00:40:25.800 --> 00:40:28.820
process did not end there.

381
00:40:28.820 --> 00:40:34.460
Market interest rates are depressed, it is true, by buying short- and long-term obligations,

382
00:40:34.460 --> 00:40:39.460
by creating deposits, in brief, by manufacturing money.

383
00:40:39.460 --> 00:40:44.300
But this sets in train a series of forces which act the other way.

384
00:40:44.300 --> 00:40:50.220
The market interest rate for money can be kept below the natural rate only by continuous

385
00:40:50.220 --> 00:40:53.580
additions to the supply of money and credit.

386
00:40:53.580 --> 00:40:58.980
But these continuous additions to the money and credit supply eventually raise prices

387
00:40:58.980 --> 00:41:04.660
of commodities, and when these prices are raised, the larger amount of money now in

388
00:41:04.660 --> 00:41:11.140
circulation is needed to finance the same volume of physical transactions and production

389
00:41:11.140 --> 00:41:15.420
as was previously financed by the smaller volume of money.

390
00:41:15.420 --> 00:41:20.060
So the new money supplies are all used up in current production.

391
00:41:20.060 --> 00:41:25.580
If the attempt is made to issue new money still faster than the older supplies are already

392
00:41:25.580 --> 00:41:32.100
raising prices, the result might only be to raise prices through general fear of inflation,

393
00:41:32.100 --> 00:41:36.300
even faster than the new money supplies were put out.

394
00:41:36.300 --> 00:41:42.060
In any case, lenders, fearing that further inflation was in the offing, would demand

395
00:41:42.060 --> 00:41:48.100
a higher interest return to ensure them against the possible loss of the real capital value

396
00:41:48.100 --> 00:41:51.060
on their original loan.

397
00:41:51.060 --> 00:41:56.740
So the process by which the central bank originally was able to lower interest rates will now

398
00:41:56.740 --> 00:42:03.220
simply serve to raise them, and if the bank stops the open market and other operations

399
00:42:03.220 --> 00:42:09.540
by which it lowered interest rates, the adjustment of prices to the new volume of money and credit

400
00:42:09.540 --> 00:42:15.320
will restore interest rates to the natural level and probably even beyond.

401
00:42:15.320 --> 00:42:21.480
This is a brief, oversimplified and inadequate description of the process, but it is sufficient

402
00:42:21.480 --> 00:42:26.760
to show that everything that is true in the Keynesian monetary theory of interest was

403
00:42:26.760 --> 00:42:35.200
already recognized by Wixell, Fisher, Mises, Hayek and others before Keynes wrote.

404
00:42:35.200 --> 00:42:38.760
Keynes was undoubtedly acquainted with Wixell's work.

405
00:42:38.760 --> 00:42:42.520
He refers to it frequently in his treatise on money.

406
00:42:42.520 --> 00:42:58.520
Even in his general theory, he devotes one footnote of a couple of lines to the natural rate of Wixell, page 183, and another couple of lines to him in connection with the natural rate of interest, page 242.

407
00:42:58.520 --> 00:43:11.520
But mysteriously, he never mentions Wixell at all when he is making the same criticisms of the classical theory of interest as Wixell had made a generation before the appearance of the general theory.

408
00:43:11.520 --> 00:43:22.520
And in his left-handed reference, on page 183, he alludes to Wicksell and Hayek with the disdainful intimation that they are much too subtle.

409
00:43:22.520 --> 00:43:25.520
He quotes from Ibsen's Wild Duck,

410
00:43:25.520 --> 00:43:32.240
The wild duck has dived down to the bottom, as deep as she can get, and bitten fast hold

411
00:43:32.240 --> 00:43:38.120
of the weed and tangle and all the rubbish that is down there, and it would need an extraordinarily

412
00:43:38.120 --> 00:43:42.080
clever dog to dive after and fish her up again.

413
00:43:42.080 --> 00:43:44.000
Page 183.

414
00:43:44.000 --> 00:43:49.800
But a theory is not necessarily wrong because it was too deep and subtle for Keynes.

415
00:43:49.800 --> 00:43:54.200
In his own theory of interest, he certainly did not dive deep.

416
00:43:54.200 --> 00:43:57.200
and the merely muddied shallow waters.

417
00:43:57.200 --> 00:44:05.200
I am tempted to say that in rejecting both productivity and time preference theories or any combination of them,

418
00:44:05.200 --> 00:44:09.200
Keynes was left with no real theory of interest.

419
00:44:09.200 --> 00:44:16.200
But on second thought, it is clear that he was flirting with the oldest theory of all, the exploitation theory.

420
00:44:16.200 --> 00:44:22.200
This was once described by Irving Fisher as the persistent idea that

421
00:44:22.200 --> 00:44:28.660
To take interest is necessarily and always to take an unfair advantage of the debtor.

422
00:44:28.660 --> 00:44:33.640
This notion is something more than the obviously true idea that the rate of interest, like

423
00:44:33.640 --> 00:44:36.700
any other price, may be exorbitant.

424
00:44:36.700 --> 00:44:41.740
The contention is that there ought to be no interest at all.

425
00:44:41.740 --> 00:44:47.620
After tracing the persistence of this notion through primitive societies, ancient Rome,

426
00:44:47.620 --> 00:44:53.460
In the Middle Ages, Fisher declared that, today, the chief survival of the exploitation

427
00:44:53.460 --> 00:45:00.180
idea is among Marxian socialists, but Fisher wrote this some years before Keynes attempted

428
00:45:00.180 --> 00:45:03.620
Still Another Revival in Modern Guys.