WEBVTT

NOTE 24. Keynes Lets Himself Go

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.800
Chapter 14, Keynes lets himself go.

2
00:00:09.800 --> 00:00:16.460
In his final chapter, concluding notes on the social philosophy towards which the general

3
00:00:16.460 --> 00:00:21.780
theory might lead, Keynes really lets himself go.

4
00:00:21.780 --> 00:00:29.220
Here he assumes that all his previous propositions have been proved and draws his triumphant

5
00:00:29.220 --> 00:00:32.500
and Sweeping Conclusions.

6
00:00:32.500 --> 00:00:39.660
This chapter, therefore, is even more tightly packed with fallacies and unwarranted deductions

7
00:00:39.660 --> 00:00:42.040
than any of the others.

8
00:00:42.040 --> 00:00:49.340
But it has the advantage of stating its fallacies in relatively clear and un-technical language,

9
00:00:49.340 --> 00:00:55.460
and it will therefore give us the opportunity also of reviewing them in clearer and less

10
00:00:55.460 --> 00:01:24.460
The Outstanding Faults of the Economic Society in Which We Live, Keynes Begins, are its Failure to Provide for Full Employment and its Arbitrary and Inequitable Distribution of Wealth and Incomes, page 372.

11
00:01:24.460 --> 00:01:29.460
There are four chief things wrong with this statement.

12
00:01:29.460 --> 00:01:39.460
One, the vagueness of Keynes's full employment concept, to which we shall return later for closer examination.

13
00:01:39.460 --> 00:01:47.460
Two, prolonged mass unemployment is not the fault of our economic society,

14
00:01:47.460 --> 00:01:55.020
but of governmental interventions in labor-management relations, wage rates and money and banking

15
00:01:55.020 --> 00:02:01.300
policy, the very kind of intervention that Keynes wished to increase.

16
00:02:01.300 --> 00:02:02.580
3.

17
00:02:02.580 --> 00:02:10.380
The distribution of wealth and incomes is, in the main, neither arbitrary nor inequitable

18
00:02:10.380 --> 00:02:14.100
in a competitive free-market system.

19
00:02:14.100 --> 00:02:23.880
As John Bates Clark showed so brilliantly in The Distribution of Wealth, 1899, free competition

20
00:02:23.880 --> 00:02:30.420
tends to give to labor what labor creates, to capitalists what capital creates, and to

21
00:02:30.420 --> 00:02:35.900
entrepreneurs what the coordinating function creates.

22
00:02:35.900 --> 00:02:42.620
Individual inequities are bound to occur, but they are not systematic.

23
00:02:42.620 --> 00:02:49.420
The system itself tends constantly to reduce them by its rewards to production.

24
00:02:49.420 --> 00:02:56.260
If we are looking for really arbitrary and inequitable distribution, we can find it in

25
00:02:56.260 --> 00:03:04.140
the East, or in backward and underdeveloped countries, or in communist Russia and China,

26
00:03:04.140 --> 00:03:09.620
in short, in either pre-capitalistic or socialist societies.

27
00:03:09.620 --> 00:03:27.620
4. It is even a misnomer in capitalist countries to call this process distribution. Income and wealth are not distributed but produced, and in general go to those who produce them.

28
00:03:27.620 --> 00:03:37.620
But even if all this were not true, there is no reason to suppose that the Keynesian nostrums would remedy the situation.

29
00:03:37.620 --> 00:03:46.620
Keynes next goes on to praise the significant progress brought about by the progressive income tax and death duties,

30
00:03:46.620 --> 00:03:52.620
a progress that economists are coming increasingly to doubt.

31
00:03:52.620 --> 00:03:57.620
Up to the point where full employment prevails, he tells us,

32
00:03:57.620 --> 00:04:03.620
the growth of capital depends not at all on a low propensity to consume,

33
00:04:03.620 --> 00:04:12.100
but is, on the contrary, held back by it, pages 372 to 373.

34
00:04:12.100 --> 00:04:19.760
An increase in the habitual propensity to consume will, in general, i.e. except in conditions

35
00:04:19.760 --> 00:04:29.500
of full employment, serve to increase at the same time the inducement to invest, page 373.

36
00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:36.300
The growth of wealth, so far from being dependent on the abstinence of the rich, as is commonly

37
00:04:36.300 --> 00:04:40.440
supposed, is more likely to be impeded by it.

38
00:04:40.440 --> 00:04:47.100
One of the chief social justifications of great inequality of wealth is, therefore,

39
00:04:47.100 --> 00:04:48.100
removed.

40
00:04:48.100 --> 00:04:50.860
Page 373

41
00:04:50.860 --> 00:04:54.280
How marvelous is the Keynesian world!

42
00:04:54.280 --> 00:04:57.580
The more you spend, the more you save.

43
00:04:57.580 --> 00:05:01.660
The more you eat your cake, the more cake you have.

44
00:05:01.660 --> 00:05:06.820
The less you save, the more inducement you have to invest.

45
00:05:06.820 --> 00:05:11.560
But there is, perhaps, a flaw in this logic.

46
00:05:11.560 --> 00:05:17.580
Even Keynes has insisted that saving and investment must be equal.

47
00:05:17.580 --> 00:05:24.760
As you can only invest what you save, the less you save, the less you are able to invest,

48
00:05:24.760 --> 00:05:28.440
no matter how great the inducement to invest.

49
00:05:28.440 --> 00:05:36.940
Moreover, it is not excessive saving that creates unemployment, but excessive wage rates.

50
00:05:36.940 --> 00:05:41.700
Wage rates that is above the marginal productivity point.

51
00:05:41.700 --> 00:05:46.600
But we have been over and over all this ground before.

52
00:05:46.600 --> 00:05:51.160
There follows a long paragraph in which Keynes concedes that,

53
00:05:51.160 --> 00:06:03.660
There is social and psychological justification for significant inequalities of incomes and wealth, but not for such large disparities as exist today.

54
00:06:03.660 --> 00:06:06.660
Page 374

55
00:06:06.660 --> 00:06:14.160
It appears that there are valuable human activities which require the motive of money-making,

56
00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:20.620
But much lower stakes will serve the purpose equally well, and the task of transmuting

57
00:06:20.620 --> 00:06:26.540
human nature must not be confused with the task of managing it.

58
00:06:26.540 --> 00:06:29.380
This paragraph is revelatory.

59
00:06:29.380 --> 00:06:32.700
It betrays the totalitarian touch.

60
00:06:32.700 --> 00:06:37.060
It shows Keynes in the role of Father Knows Best.

61
00:06:37.060 --> 00:06:43.360
He and his friends know, just by personal judgment, exactly what rewards and penalties

62
00:06:43.360 --> 00:06:45.280
are necessary.

63
00:06:45.280 --> 00:06:49.360
The people are to be managed by the Keynesian elite.

64
00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:55.400
A man does not have a right to keep what he earns, but allowing him to keep some of it

65
00:06:55.400 --> 00:07:01.520
is a gracious privilege in which a government clique of omniscient Keynesians may indulge

66
00:07:01.520 --> 00:07:07.480
him, like allowing a child to have just a little candy.

67
00:07:07.480 --> 00:07:14.280
Just what, except expediency, prevented Keynes from announcing himself a complete socialist

68
00:07:14.280 --> 00:07:16.400
I do not know.

69
00:07:16.400 --> 00:07:22.400
What he seemed to want was a government-managed economy that would imitate some of the features

70
00:07:22.400 --> 00:07:25.920
of capitalism.

71
00:07:25.920 --> 00:07:30.200
The Euthanasia of the Ranthier

72
00:07:30.200 --> 00:07:35.300
Keynes turns back next to his theory of the rate of interest.

73
00:07:35.300 --> 00:07:41.380
The justification for a moderately high rate of interest has been found hitherto in the

74
00:07:41.380 --> 00:07:46.180
necessity of providing a sufficient inducement to save.

75
00:07:46.180 --> 00:07:53.340
But we have shown that the extent of effective saving is necessarily determined by the scale

76
00:07:53.340 --> 00:08:00.740
of investment, and that the scale of investment is promoted by a low rate of interest.

77
00:08:00.740 --> 00:08:07.780
Thus, it is to our best advantage to reduce the rate of interest to that point relatively

78
00:08:07.780 --> 00:08:14.740
to the schedule of the marginal efficiency of capital at which there is full employment.

79
00:08:14.740 --> 00:08:20.660
There can be no doubt that this criterion will lead to a much lower rate of interest

80
00:08:20.660 --> 00:08:23.420
than has ruled hitherto.

81
00:08:23.420 --> 00:08:30.220
Page 375 Now, many non-Keynesian economists are not

82
00:08:30.220 --> 00:08:37.780
sure that the inducement to save increases in direct proportion to the rate of interest.

83
00:08:37.780 --> 00:08:44.880
We need not go into the pros and cons of this argument, except to point out that a certain

84
00:08:44.880 --> 00:08:52.580
minimum interest rate is necessary to induce, if not saving, at least investment, which

85
00:08:52.580 --> 00:08:56.400
Which Keynes tells us is his main interest.

86
00:08:56.400 --> 00:09:01.820
Keynes persistently thinks of investment as merely what a borrowing entrepreneur puts

87
00:09:01.820 --> 00:09:04.080
into his own business.

88
00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:10.720
I am here using the term to mean also any loan that a man makes with his savings, the

89
00:09:10.720 --> 00:09:14.240
purchase of a bond, etc.

90
00:09:14.240 --> 00:09:20.960
When Keynes tells us that the scale of effective saving is necessarily determined by the scale

91
00:09:20.960 --> 00:09:28.320
of Investment, he forgets that the primary causation is the other way round.

92
00:09:28.320 --> 00:09:30.920
Saving determines investment.

93
00:09:30.920 --> 00:09:34.760
Without saving, there is nothing to invest.

94
00:09:34.760 --> 00:09:41.400
Even on Keynes's own definitions, investment cannot come into being without equivalent

95
00:09:41.400 --> 00:09:42.560
savings.

96
00:09:42.560 --> 00:09:49.220
To say that the scale of investment is promoted by a low rate of interest is to look at the

97
00:09:49.220 --> 00:09:54.860
the matter solely from the point of view of the borrower and to forget the point of view

98
00:09:54.860 --> 00:09:57.100
of the lender.

99
00:09:57.100 --> 00:10:02.180
Suppose we applied Keynes's dictums to buying and selling.

100
00:10:02.180 --> 00:10:06.020
We would then write something like this.

101
00:10:06.020 --> 00:10:12.440
Buying is not determined by purchasing power, but effective purchasing power is determined

102
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:19.800
by the scale of buying, and the scale of buying is promoted by low prices.

103
00:10:19.800 --> 00:10:24.280
This would be immediately recognized as nonsense.

104
00:10:24.280 --> 00:10:30.640
Even a Keynesian might be expected to see that the scale of selling or of producing

105
00:10:30.640 --> 00:10:38.200
for sale is promoted by high prices, which give the highest inducement to produce.

106
00:10:38.200 --> 00:10:45.160
Of course, in practice, the maximum production, buying and selling are achieved by the right

107
00:10:45.160 --> 00:10:51.800
equilibrium price, the price which does most to harmonize the desires and incentives of

108
00:10:51.800 --> 00:10:57.440
producers, sellers, buyers and consumers, respectively.

109
00:10:57.440 --> 00:11:00.120
So it is with interest rates.

110
00:11:00.120 --> 00:11:07.000
The interest rate that promotes the maximum saving, lending, borrowing and investment is

111
00:11:07.000 --> 00:11:13.500
is neither the highest interest rate nor the lowest interest rate, but an equilibrium interest

112
00:11:13.500 --> 00:11:19.920
rate at which the greatest numbers of desires and incentives of both lenders and borrowers

113
00:11:19.920 --> 00:11:22.000
are reconciled.

114
00:11:22.000 --> 00:11:28.760
Keynes's theory of the interest rate, like his emphasis on the monetary income of consumers

115
00:11:28.760 --> 00:11:34.920
and on the propensity to consume, is purely a demand theory.

116
00:11:34.920 --> 00:11:41.140
Just as he seems to think in terms solely of the propensity to spend and buy, and not

117
00:11:41.140 --> 00:11:48.400
of the propensity to work or produce or sell, so he thinks solely of the incentive to borrow

118
00:11:48.400 --> 00:11:53.640
and ignores the need of the incentive to save and to lend.

119
00:11:53.640 --> 00:12:00.440
When he takes account of the latter incentive, he does so only to denounce it as anti-social

120
00:12:00.440 --> 00:12:02.600
and wicked.

121
00:12:02.600 --> 00:12:08.800
How does Keynes know that there can be no doubt that a rate of interest fixed in accordance

122
00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:15.600
with the marginal efficiency of capital at which there is full employment will be a much

123
00:12:15.600 --> 00:12:20.280
lower rate of interest than has ruled hitherto?

124
00:12:20.280 --> 00:12:25.120
Apparently because his personal feelings tell him so.

125
00:12:25.120 --> 00:12:31.040
I feel sure that the demand for capital is strictly limited in the sense that it would

126
00:12:31.040 --> 00:12:56.980
Page 375 Insofar as there is any argument at all for

127
00:12:56.980 --> 00:13:04.540
For the conclusion on page 375, it seems to rest on the question-begging assumption that

128
00:13:04.540 --> 00:13:12.040
unemployment is the result of excessive interest rates rather than excessive wage rates.

129
00:13:12.040 --> 00:13:18.480
Keynes does not appear to understand even the main purpose of capital and capital goods.

130
00:13:18.480 --> 00:13:24.740
That purpose is not merely to increase output and to produce consumer goods that could not

131
00:13:24.740 --> 00:13:30.860
otherwise be produced, but to reduce costs of production.

132
00:13:30.860 --> 00:13:38.340
Why would anybody invest in capital goods if he got no net return worth speaking of?

133
00:13:38.340 --> 00:13:44.380
Let us take, for example, a house that costs $20,000 to build.

134
00:13:44.380 --> 00:13:49.740
One can understand that a man might build such a house to live in himself.

135
00:13:49.740 --> 00:13:55.140
One can understand that he might build it to rent out to someone else, provided, of

136
00:13:55.140 --> 00:14:01.100
course, that he got a good deal more rent than simply enough to cover exhaustion by

137
00:14:01.100 --> 00:14:04.180
wastage and obsolescence.

138
00:14:04.180 --> 00:14:11.020
But suppose he were asked, instead, to lend a mortgage for the full value of such a house,

139
00:14:11.020 --> 00:14:16.820
to enable someone else to build it to rent out to still a third person.

140
00:14:16.820 --> 00:14:22.820
It is obvious that, in order to induce him to do this, the interest rate offered would

141
00:14:22.820 --> 00:14:30.660
have to be equal to the presumptive rent of the house, minus the annual estimated depreciation,

142
00:14:30.660 --> 00:14:36.580
compensation for the worry and trouble of management, the landlord function, and relative

143
00:14:36.580 --> 00:14:42.860
protection against the risks of vacancy and of real estate speculation.

144
00:14:42.860 --> 00:14:49.500
The mortgagee's return, in short, is intimately connected with the prospective return of the

145
00:14:49.500 --> 00:14:52.400
legal owner of the building.

146
00:14:52.400 --> 00:14:58.680
This is merely a special case of the constant close relationship between the rate of interest

147
00:14:58.680 --> 00:15:03.340
and the marginal yield of specific capital goods.

148
00:15:03.340 --> 00:15:09.820
If the intended mortgagee were not offered such a return, he would not lend the money.

149
00:15:09.820 --> 00:15:15.780
If the builder of the house were not allowed to charge a rent, making it worthwhile, he

150
00:15:15.780 --> 00:15:22.260
would not build houses, either with his own money or somebody else's.

151
00:15:22.260 --> 00:15:28.620
How then would Keynes force down interest rates and even the return to the entrepreneur

152
00:15:28.620 --> 00:15:33.500
and still get his saving, investment and production?

153
00:15:33.500 --> 00:15:40.620
What he really has in mind, apparently, is seizing the money through taxation and creating

154
00:15:40.620 --> 00:15:44.540
forced investment through the government.

155
00:15:44.540 --> 00:15:47.620
Does my assumption go too far?

156
00:15:47.620 --> 00:15:50.780
Then listen to this.

157
00:15:50.780 --> 00:15:58.380
Though this state of affairs, just about enough return to cover cost of capital replacement,

158
00:15:58.380 --> 00:16:05.180
would be quite compatible with some measures of individualism, yet it would mean the euthanasia

159
00:16:05.180 --> 00:16:12.540
of the rentier, and consequently the euthanasia of the cumulative oppressive power of the capitalist

160
00:16:12.540 --> 00:16:21.580
to exploit the scarcity value of capital, pages 375 through 376.

161
00:16:21.580 --> 00:16:28.160
For the light it throws on the heart of Keynes's message and on the popularity of his ideas

162
00:16:28.160 --> 00:16:34.460
Among Leftists, this sentence is one of the most revealing in the book.

163
00:16:34.460 --> 00:16:42.080
Notice how patronizingly individualism, i.e. individual liberty, is treated.

164
00:16:42.080 --> 00:16:48.800
Keynes would graciously allow some measure of it, but he insists on the euthanasia of

165
00:16:48.800 --> 00:16:51.120
the rentier.

166
00:16:51.120 --> 00:16:53.480
Euthanasia means painless death.

167
00:16:53.480 --> 00:16:58.560
That is, the death of the rentier would be painless to Keynes.

168
00:16:58.560 --> 00:17:05.040
There is an old proverb that if you want to hang a dog, you must first call him mad.

169
00:17:05.040 --> 00:17:10.020
If you want to knock a man down, you should first give him a bad name.

170
00:17:10.020 --> 00:17:14.880
So Keynes uses the French rentier as a smear word.

171
00:17:14.880 --> 00:17:21.620
The rentier is the terrible fellow who saves a little money and puts it in a savings bank,

172
00:17:21.620 --> 00:17:28.280
For he buys a bond of United States Steel and uses his cumulative oppressive power as

173
00:17:28.280 --> 00:17:34.500
a capitalist to exploit the U.S. Steel Corporation.

174
00:17:34.500 --> 00:17:38.020
All this is demagogy and claptrap.

175
00:17:38.020 --> 00:17:44.620
It differs from the Marxist brand only in technical detail.

176
00:17:44.620 --> 00:17:49.460
Robbing the Productive

177
00:17:49.460 --> 00:17:56.500
Interest today, Keynes goes on, rewards no genuine sacrifice any more than does the rent

178
00:17:56.500 --> 00:17:58.060
of land.

179
00:17:58.060 --> 00:18:05.020
The owner of capital can obtain interest because capital is scarce, just as the owner of land

180
00:18:05.020 --> 00:18:08.880
can obtain rent because land is scarce.

181
00:18:08.880 --> 00:18:14.940
But whilst there may be intrinsic reasons for the scarcity of land, there can be no

182
00:18:14.940 --> 00:18:19.220
intrinsic reasons for the scarcity of capital.

183
00:18:19.220 --> 00:18:25.600
Even so, it will still be possible for communal saving through the agency of the state to

184
00:18:25.600 --> 00:18:31.180
be maintained at a level which will allow the growth of capital up to the point where

185
00:18:31.180 --> 00:18:33.660
it ceases to be scarce.

186
00:18:33.660 --> 00:18:36.900
Page 376

187
00:18:36.900 --> 00:18:42.740
How does Keynes know that interest rewards no genuine sacrifice?

188
00:18:42.740 --> 00:18:49.140
Certainly savers and moderate circumstances are constantly making sacrifices of immediate

189
00:18:49.140 --> 00:18:55.740
gratifications in order to save for a home, for the education of their children, or against

190
00:18:55.740 --> 00:18:58.340
possible ill health.

191
00:18:58.340 --> 00:19:05.420
What does Keynes know about the individual sacrifices, abstentions and choices of individual

192
00:19:05.420 --> 00:19:06.960
savers?

193
00:19:06.960 --> 00:19:12.300
And does the rent of land reward no genuine sacrifice?

194
00:19:12.300 --> 00:19:18.180
Doesn't Keynes know that the capital and rental value of most land in the civilized world

195
00:19:18.180 --> 00:19:25.180
Today is in large part the result of the capital that has gone into the roads and other communications

196
00:19:25.180 --> 00:19:33.340
that lead to it, as well as the clearing, leveling, draining, irrigation, plowing, fertilization

197
00:19:33.340 --> 00:19:39.060
and building that have been put into it, all at a capital cost.

198
00:19:39.060 --> 00:19:44.980
What does Keynes mean when he declares that there are no intrinsic reasons for the scarcity

199
00:19:44.980 --> 00:19:46.980
of capital?

200
00:19:46.980 --> 00:19:53.780
The greatest and sufficient intrinsic reason, the fact that, in America, for example, there

201
00:19:53.780 --> 00:20:00.940
was no capital at all when we got here, and all of it had to be created by somebody, by

202
00:20:00.940 --> 00:20:06.940
some people's hard work and saving, even if some of them wouldn't have been admitted into

203
00:20:06.940 --> 00:20:09.620
the Bloomsbury Circle.

204
00:20:09.620 --> 00:20:15.660
There is still scarcity of capital, simply and solely because not enough of it has been

205
00:20:15.660 --> 00:20:26.300
Incidentally, people are not rewarded in economic life for sacrifice, but simply for producing

206
00:20:26.300 --> 00:20:31.900
something that somebody else wants enough to be willing to pay for.

207
00:20:31.900 --> 00:20:39.980
I don't pay the General Motors Corporation $3,000 to reward its sacrifice in producing

208
00:20:39.980 --> 00:20:46.220
and Oldsmobile, I pay it because I want the Oldsmobile.

209
00:20:46.220 --> 00:20:52.540
If a man turns out something that you or I don't want, we are not interested in how much

210
00:20:52.540 --> 00:20:55.820
sacrifice his product cost him.

211
00:20:55.820 --> 00:21:03.260
It is not up to us to reward him for producing something for which we can find no use.

212
00:21:03.260 --> 00:21:10.680
In Keynes's topsy-turvy economics, in which only genuine sacrifice is rewarded, we would

213
00:21:10.680 --> 00:21:19.080
pay nothing to an inventor, musical composer, artist or author unless he could prove that

214
00:21:19.080 --> 00:21:26.660
he didn't actually enjoy inventing, composing, painting or writing.

215
00:21:26.660 --> 00:21:34.180
To say that the owner of capital or the owner of land exploits scarcity is merely an ominous

216
00:21:34.180 --> 00:21:40.280
way of saying that all economic value is scarcity value.

217
00:21:40.280 --> 00:21:47.360
A market price for anything whatever can be obtained only because that thing is relatively

218
00:21:47.360 --> 00:21:52.940
scarce in the sense that it is not a free gift of nature.

219
00:21:52.940 --> 00:22:00.900
Keynes's economics of abundance for capital goods could be set down as a dream world if

220
00:22:00.900 --> 00:22:06.460
it were not for the final sentence from Keynes quoted above.

221
00:22:06.460 --> 00:22:14.520
There he tacitly admits that savings and capital will not be forthcoming on the practically

222
00:22:14.520 --> 00:22:18.780
non-existent return that he proposes.

223
00:22:18.780 --> 00:22:27.500
But then, ah, the state steps in, the magical state, seizes the capital through taxation

224
00:22:27.500 --> 00:22:31.460
and does its own investing.

225
00:22:31.460 --> 00:22:37.820
Only the long-run result of this, of course, would be to reduce production and to make

226
00:22:37.820 --> 00:22:41.940
real capital scarcer than ever.

227
00:22:41.940 --> 00:22:43.580
Keynes goes on.

228
00:22:43.580 --> 00:22:52.300
I see, therefore, the rentier aspect of capitalism as a transitional phase which will disappear

229
00:22:52.300 --> 00:22:54.700
when it has done its work.

230
00:22:54.700 --> 00:22:57.700
Page 376.

231
00:22:57.700 --> 00:23:05.460
This sentence implies the Hegelian-Marxian stage theory of history, except that nothing

232
00:23:05.460 --> 00:23:12.580
previous in the theory of Keynes explains what the work of the rentier aspect actually

233
00:23:12.580 --> 00:23:21.780
According to his theory, the Ranthier always demanded a rate of interest that was too high,

234
00:23:21.780 --> 00:23:27.280
and for some inscrutable reason was able to get it.

235
00:23:27.280 --> 00:23:34.500
As the Ranthier, in brief, according to Keynesian theory, never had any excuse for existing

236
00:23:34.500 --> 00:23:41.760
in the first place, he never did any work except to hold up economic progress and produce

237
00:23:41.760 --> 00:23:44.480
Unemployment.

238
00:23:44.480 --> 00:23:51.540
And with the disappearance of its rentier aspect, Keynes goes on, much else in it besides

239
00:23:51.540 --> 00:23:54.160
will suffer a sea-change.

240
00:23:54.160 --> 00:24:00.840
It will be, moreover, a great advantage of the order of events which I am advocating,

241
00:24:00.840 --> 00:24:07.440
that the euthanasia of the rentier, of the functionless investor, will be nothing sudden,

242
00:24:07.440 --> 00:24:13.880
Nearly a gradual but prolonged continuance of what we have seen recently in Great Britain

243
00:24:13.880 --> 00:24:19.800
and will need no revolution, page 376.

244
00:24:19.800 --> 00:24:22.700
This is all very reassuring.

245
00:24:22.700 --> 00:24:29.920
The Rontier will be killed off quietly because he will be unable to offer any resistance,

246
00:24:29.920 --> 00:24:37.080
and Britain will enjoy that marvelous prosperity that followed her adoption of the Keynesian

247
00:24:37.080 --> 00:24:38.080
and Remedies.

248
00:24:38.080 --> 00:24:45.160
Although, after years of cheap money following the appearance of the General Theory, a bank

249
00:24:45.160 --> 00:24:56.160
rate of 2% in 1937, 1948, 1950, etc., the Bank of England was finally forced to tighten

250
00:24:56.160 --> 00:25:03.160
up to a discount rate of 7% in September of 1957.

251
00:25:03.160 --> 00:25:06.960
But what about the functionless investor?

252
00:25:06.960 --> 00:25:11.720
Here, I think, Keynes' pen inadvertently slipped.

253
00:25:11.720 --> 00:25:19.920
The investor, by his previous definition, has hitherto been his hero, his entrepreneur,

254
00:25:19.920 --> 00:25:24.080
exploited by that real villain, the saver.

255
00:25:24.080 --> 00:25:31.520
Did not the investor serve a function by earning and saving enough to become an investor?

256
00:25:31.520 --> 00:25:37.800
Did he not serve another function by making a choice of which project or firm to invest

257
00:25:37.800 --> 00:25:41.920
in and which not to invest in?

258
00:25:41.920 --> 00:25:48.080
But Keynes is really waxing eloquent now, and we should not interrupt him by these trivial

259
00:25:48.080 --> 00:25:50.240
questions.

260
00:25:50.240 --> 00:25:55.440
He goes on, Thus we might aim in practice, there being

261
00:25:55.440 --> 00:26:01.400
nothing in this which is unattainable, at an increase in the volume of capital until

262
00:26:01.400 --> 00:26:07.560
until it ceases to be scarce, so that the functionless investor will no longer receive

263
00:26:07.560 --> 00:26:15.000
a bonus, and at a scheme of direct taxation which allows the intelligence and determination

264
00:26:15.000 --> 00:26:22.800
and executive skill of the financier, the entrepreneur ad hoc genus omni, who are certainly

265
00:26:22.800 --> 00:26:29.200
so fond of their craft that their labor could be obtained much cheaper than at present,

266
00:26:29.200 --> 00:26:40.060
to be harnessed to the service of the community on reasonable terms of reward, p. 376-377.

267
00:26:40.060 --> 00:26:46.560
In reply, it may be pointed out that capital will cease to be scarce only when it ceases

268
00:26:46.560 --> 00:26:52.400
to have value, so that anybody will be willing to give it away.

269
00:26:52.400 --> 00:26:59.040
It will cease to have value only when it either costs nothing to produce, or when it's

270
00:26:59.040 --> 00:27:06.320
This application ceases to reduce the costs, including time, of production of anything,

271
00:27:06.320 --> 00:27:12.600
or when the consumer goods that it helps to turn out themselves cease to be scarce and

272
00:27:12.600 --> 00:27:17.880
to have value, all of which conditions are impossible.

273
00:27:17.880 --> 00:27:26.320
The application of capital increases technological progress, and technological progress itself

274
00:27:26.320 --> 00:27:33.680
makes old machines and materials obsolete at the expense of new machines and materials.

275
00:27:33.680 --> 00:27:41.680
So, capital, by aiding progress, automatically increases the need and value and scarcity

276
00:27:41.680 --> 00:27:46.160
of new capital for new applications.

277
00:27:46.160 --> 00:27:53.100
Keynes's scheme of direct taxation is a scheme to rob the productive in order to reward the

278
00:27:53.100 --> 00:27:55.020
unproductive.

279
00:27:55.020 --> 00:28:02.060
It tries to exploit the fact that certain entrepreneurs, like certain poets, musicians,

280
00:28:02.060 --> 00:28:06.700
artists, scientists, are fond of their craft.

281
00:28:06.700 --> 00:28:13.660
But the attempt to exploit these, to treat them like draft horses, to pay them just enough

282
00:28:13.660 --> 00:28:18.020
to keep them working, would have one flaw.

283
00:28:18.020 --> 00:28:24.060
Other entrepreneurs work primarily for the rewards in it, and when these are cut down

284
00:28:24.060 --> 00:28:30.940
and below a sufficient inducement, they play golf or choose some other alternative, as

285
00:28:30.940 --> 00:28:37.300
the results of the expropriatory rates of the existing income tax are proving every

286
00:28:37.300 --> 00:28:38.300
day.

287
00:28:38.300 --> 00:28:46.300
It is obvious from Keynes's tone that he had an ill-concealed contempt, as befitted a member

288
00:28:46.300 --> 00:28:51.380
of the Bloomsbury Circle for the business entrepreneur.

289
00:28:51.380 --> 00:28:54.740
means concludes this section by writing.

290
00:28:54.740 --> 00:29:02.060
It would remain for separate decision on what scale and by what means it is right and reasonable

291
00:29:02.060 --> 00:29:08.980
to call on the living generation to restrict their consumption so as to establish, in course

292
00:29:08.980 --> 00:29:13.920
of time, a state of full investment for their successors.

293
00:29:13.920 --> 00:29:16.540
Page 377.

294
00:29:16.540 --> 00:29:23.960
But people have already been deciding this question as individuals and voluntarily and

295
00:29:23.960 --> 00:29:31.520
not by collective compulsion, except through progressive income and inheritance taxes and

296
00:29:31.520 --> 00:29:35.760
so-called state investment.

297
00:29:35.760 --> 00:29:43.040
Having rejected the voluntary solution, Keynes is forced to look for a solution through compulsion,

298
00:29:43.040 --> 00:29:47.040
such as that made by totalitarian governments.

299
00:29:47.040 --> 00:29:54.040
Incidentally, full investment, as we have seen, is a silly and meaningless phrase.

300
00:29:54.040 --> 00:30:02.040
It fails to recognize the illimitable improvements that are always possible in quality,

301
00:30:02.040 --> 00:30:06.040
and it is based on purely static assumptions.

302
00:30:06.040 --> 00:30:11.040
What becomes of full investment in a particular machine, for example,

303
00:30:11.040 --> 00:30:19.440
When a new machine or process is invented that makes the old one obsolete.

304
00:30:19.440 --> 00:30:28.640
The Socialization of Investment And now Keynes has a few kind and condescending

305
00:30:28.640 --> 00:30:36.800
words to say about a free and voluntary economic system, but beware of Keynes when he brings

306
00:30:36.800 --> 00:30:39.040
as Gifts.

307
00:30:39.040 --> 00:30:47.880
In some other respects, he begins, the foregoing theory is moderately conservative in its implications.

308
00:30:47.880 --> 00:30:56.560
There are wide fields of activity which are unaffected, pages 377 through 378.

309
00:30:56.560 --> 00:31:03.360
Of course, the state will have to increase the propensity to consume, i.e., discourage

310
00:31:03.360 --> 00:31:12.360
and it must fix, i.e. lower the rate of interest, and there must be a somewhat comprehensive

311
00:31:12.360 --> 00:31:20.920
socialization of investment, but beyond this, no obvious case can be made out for a system

312
00:31:20.920 --> 00:31:27.240
of state socialism which would embrace most of the economic life of the community.

313
00:31:27.240 --> 00:31:33.880
Page 378 It is hard to believe that Keynes is as naïve

314
00:31:33.880 --> 00:31:39.220
as he pretends, and that he is not laughing up his sleeve.

315
00:31:39.220 --> 00:31:45.840
The rate of interest, the valuation of time and of all investments, is to be taken out

316
00:31:45.840 --> 00:31:50.760
of the market and put completely in the hands of the State.

317
00:31:50.760 --> 00:31:56.640
But Keynes ignores the complete interconnectedness of all prices.

318
00:31:56.640 --> 00:32:03.480
This especially includes the price of capital loans, any state tinkering with which must

319
00:32:03.480 --> 00:32:12.720
necessarily affect and distort all prices and price relationships throughout the economy.

320
00:32:12.720 --> 00:32:19.120
Through its socialized investment, moreover, the state would decide which firms or industries

321
00:32:19.120 --> 00:32:24.160
to expand and which to freeze or contract.

322
00:32:24.160 --> 00:32:29.900
Even though the state did not technically own the instruments of production, this would

323
00:32:29.900 --> 00:32:33.940
lead to a de facto socialism.

324
00:32:33.940 --> 00:32:41.800
Keynes continues, But if our central controls succeed in establishing an aggregate volume

325
00:32:41.800 --> 00:32:49.140
of output corresponding to full employment as nearly as practicable, the classical theory

326
00:32:49.140 --> 00:32:56.300
comes into its own again from this point onwards, page 378.

327
00:32:56.300 --> 00:33:03.420
Let's see, the free market system, which is what Keynes means by the classical theory,

328
00:33:03.420 --> 00:33:10.340
is incapable, according to him, of properly fixing the volume of money and credit, or

329
00:33:10.340 --> 00:33:17.940
the proper rate of interest, or the right volume and direction of investment, or the

330
00:33:17.940 --> 00:33:26.340
The Right Volume of Output or Adequate Employment, but outside of that very little can be said

331
00:33:26.340 --> 00:33:28.580
against it.

332
00:33:28.580 --> 00:33:35.140
Yet Keynesians solemnly cite selected sentences of the sort I have just quoted in order to

333
00:33:35.140 --> 00:33:43.020
prove that Keynes was really a conservative and, aside from one or two minor reservations,

334
00:33:43.020 --> 00:33:47.180
a disciple of the classical economy.

335
00:33:47.180 --> 00:33:55.100
It is worth noting that though he talks constantly in this chapter as in others of full employment,

336
00:33:55.100 --> 00:34:02.060
he never mentions excessive wage rates as a possible cause of unemployment or suggests

337
00:34:02.060 --> 00:34:06.300
any government interference with them.

338
00:34:06.300 --> 00:34:12.800
These are to be left, as before, to the labor union leaders, which are to continue to enjoy

339
00:34:12.800 --> 00:34:18.800
Legal Privileges and Immunities Denied to All Other Groups

340
00:34:18.800 --> 00:34:26.120
If we suppose the volume of output to be given, Keynes continues, i.e. to be determined by

341
00:34:26.120 --> 00:34:32.880
forces outside the classical scheme of thought, then private self-interest will determine

342
00:34:32.880 --> 00:34:39.720
what in particular is produced, in what proportions the factors of production will be combined

343
00:34:39.720 --> 00:34:46.680
to Produce It and How the Value of the Final Product Will Be Distributed Between Them,

344
00:34:46.680 --> 00:34:51.480
pages 378 through 379.

345
00:34:51.480 --> 00:34:55.420
This passage is an obvious self-contradiction.

346
00:34:55.420 --> 00:35:03.920
If the state determines how much will be invested, at what interest rate and just where, it necessarily

347
00:35:03.920 --> 00:35:10.760
Determines What in Particular is Produced and With What Factors.

348
00:35:10.760 --> 00:35:15.640
Keynes's scheme would take all of this out of private hands.

349
00:35:15.640 --> 00:35:22.360
He merely refuses to recognize the implications of his own proposals.

350
00:35:22.360 --> 00:35:28.160
Keynes continues his patronizing attitude toward personal liberty.

351
00:35:28.160 --> 00:35:33.080
There will still remain a wide field for the exercise of private initiative

352
00:35:33.080 --> 00:35:40.280
and Responsibility, Within This Field the Traditional Advantages of Individualism Will

353
00:35:40.280 --> 00:35:44.640
Still Hold Good, page 380.

354
00:35:44.640 --> 00:35:51.560
I suppose one example of this would be the progressive income tax, so warmly approved

355
00:35:51.560 --> 00:36:00.080
by Keynes, which, in the United States, at the time of writing, rises to 91% on the highest

356
00:36:00.080 --> 00:36:25.740
Let us stop for a moment, Keynes goes on, to remind ourselves what these advantages are.

357
00:36:25.740 --> 00:36:29.240
They are partly advantages of efficiency.

358
00:36:29.240 --> 00:36:35.720
The advantages of decentralization and of the play of self-interest.

359
00:36:35.720 --> 00:36:43.960
The advantage to efficiency of the decentralization of decisions and of individual responsibility

360
00:36:43.960 --> 00:36:49.160
is even greater, perhaps, than the nineteenth century supposed.

361
00:36:49.160 --> 00:36:54.960
And the reaction against the appeal to self-interest may have gone too far.

362
00:36:54.960 --> 00:37:02.440
Page 380 Well, after 379 pages talking about all the

363
00:37:02.440 --> 00:37:09.680
alleged damage done by individual responsibility and self-interest, it seems a little late

364
00:37:09.680 --> 00:37:14.880
on the fourth page from the end to begin a retraction.

365
00:37:14.880 --> 00:37:20.520
All this is, of course, only another self-contradiction.

366
00:37:20.520 --> 00:37:27.660
control of the volume of saving, of interest rates and of investment centralizes the key

367
00:37:27.660 --> 00:37:35.040
decisions, leaving only derivative and much less important decisions to individuals.

368
00:37:35.040 --> 00:37:42.200
But above all, Keynes continues, individualism, if it can be purged of its defects and its

369
00:37:42.200 --> 00:37:49.000
abuses, is the best safeguard of personal liberty in the sense that, compared with any

370
00:37:49.000 --> 00:37:55.280
and Other System, it greatly widens the field for the exercise of personal choice, page

371
00:37:55.280 --> 00:37:57.640
380.

372
00:37:57.640 --> 00:38:03.000
This sententious declaration is mere tautology.

373
00:38:03.000 --> 00:38:09.480
Individualism not only safeguards personal liberty, it means personal liberty.

374
00:38:09.480 --> 00:38:16.080
And personal liberty means, of course, among other things, the freedom to exercise personal

375
00:38:16.080 --> 00:38:17.080
choice.

376
00:38:17.080 --> 00:38:25.880
The abuses and defects of which individualism is to be purged are, I presume, all the actions

377
00:38:25.880 --> 00:38:31.580
or decisions of which the bureaucrats happen to disapprove.

378
00:38:31.580 --> 00:38:38.520
Keynes then goes on to praise, in a patronizing manner, the variety of life which emerges

379
00:38:38.520 --> 00:38:42.560
from this extended field of personal choice.

380
00:38:42.560 --> 00:38:52.620
But this whole passage on page 380 and the whole chapter, in fact, is a series of self-contradictions.

381
00:38:52.620 --> 00:38:59.080
In it, Keynes tries to get the best of both worlds, to insist on a government-controlled

382
00:38:59.080 --> 00:39:06.240
economy and to call it individualism and freedom of enterprise.

383
00:39:06.240 --> 00:39:14.400
As to his praise of variety, why not competition and variety in interest rates, or competition

384
00:39:14.400 --> 00:39:17.480
and variety in investments?

385
00:39:17.480 --> 00:39:24.360
Why not the exercise of personal choice in making one's own investments with the money

386
00:39:24.360 --> 00:39:26.360
one has earned?

387
00:39:26.360 --> 00:39:33.460
Whilst, therefore, Keynes goes on, the enlargement of the functions of government would seem

388
00:39:33.460 --> 00:39:39.820
According to a 19th century publicist or to a contemporary American financier, to be a

389
00:39:39.820 --> 00:39:47.220
terrific encroachment on individualism, I defend it, on the contrary, both as the only

390
00:39:47.220 --> 00:39:54.460
practicable means of avoiding the destruction of existing economic forms in their entirety,

391
00:39:54.460 --> 00:40:00.300
and as the condition of the successful functioning of individual initiative.

392
00:40:00.300 --> 00:40:08.900
Page 380 In other words, the way to preserve individualism is to reject it, and in a central

393
00:40:08.900 --> 00:40:17.020
field, for investment is a key decision in the operation of any economic system.

394
00:40:17.020 --> 00:40:21.500
And government investment is a form of socialism.

395
00:40:21.500 --> 00:40:26.980
Only confusion of thought or deliberate duplicity would deny this.

396
00:40:26.980 --> 00:40:33.540
For socialism, as any dictionary would tell the Keynesians, means the ownership and control

397
00:40:33.540 --> 00:40:37.300
of the means of production by the government.

398
00:40:37.300 --> 00:40:43.820
Under the system proposed by Keynes, the government would control all investment in the means

399
00:40:43.820 --> 00:40:50.520
of production and would own the part it had itself directly invested.

400
00:40:50.520 --> 00:40:57.960
It is at best mere muddleheadedness, therefore, to present the Keynesian nostrums as a free

401
00:40:57.960 --> 00:41:04.360
enterprise or individualistic alternative to socialism.

402
00:41:04.360 --> 00:41:08.760
There follows a paragraph in which Keynes declares that,

403
00:41:08.760 --> 00:41:16.200
If effective demand is deficient, not only is the public scandal of wasted resources

404
00:41:16.200 --> 00:41:23.600
is intolerable, but the individual enterpriser who seeks to bring these resources into action

405
00:41:23.600 --> 00:41:27.560
is operating with the odds loaded against him.

406
00:41:27.560 --> 00:41:30.840
The players as a whole will lose.

407
00:41:30.840 --> 00:41:37.020
Hitherto the increment of the world's wealth has fallen short of the aggregate of positive

408
00:41:37.020 --> 00:41:43.000
individual savings, and the difference has been made up by the losses of those whose

409
00:41:43.000 --> 00:41:49.640
Average courage and initiative have not been supplemented by exceptional skill or unusual

410
00:41:49.640 --> 00:41:58.080
good fortune, but if effective demand is adequate, average skill and average good fortune will

411
00:41:58.080 --> 00:42:03.960
be enough, pages 380 through 381.

412
00:42:03.960 --> 00:42:10.360
There is not a sentence in this quotation that is not based on some wrong assumption.

413
00:42:10.360 --> 00:42:20.880
Keynes' concept of wasted resources, as W.H. Hutt has shown, will not stand critical examination.

414
00:42:20.880 --> 00:42:28.720
There is much less real waste in frankly recognizing past malinvestment and either scrapping it

415
00:42:28.720 --> 00:42:35.640
or allowing it to become periodically idle than in trying to conceal its existence by

416
00:42:35.640 --> 00:42:42.040
by a Continuing Inflation or by Throwing Good Resources After Bad.

417
00:42:42.040 --> 00:42:51.020
There is also, as Hut has shown, a great deal of pseudo-idleness, as in lawnmowers or phonographs

418
00:42:51.020 --> 00:43:00.240
or evening clothes which are used only occasionally and whose services consist in their availability.

419
00:43:00.240 --> 00:43:06.200
Mises particularly forgets this important availability service when he refers to cash

420
00:43:06.200 --> 00:43:09.680
balances as hoarded money.

421
00:43:09.680 --> 00:43:17.560
Once again, net real profits by concept and definition can go at best under normal or

422
00:43:17.560 --> 00:43:26.560
static conditions only to the more foresighted, skillful or fortunate half of all entrepreneurs.

423
00:43:26.560 --> 00:43:33.080
The average entrepreneur tends to make just enough profit to compensate for the price of

424
00:43:33.080 --> 00:43:37.800
his own services if he worked for somebody else.

425
00:43:37.800 --> 00:43:46.640
The entrepreneurs with less than average foresight, skill or luck will find themselves with losses.

426
00:43:46.640 --> 00:43:51.800
Only the better than average will achieve real profits.

427
00:43:51.800 --> 00:43:59.420
This general situation is not improved by continuous inflation, but merely concealed.

428
00:43:59.420 --> 00:44:05.940
The true situation is revealed again when allowance is made for the average lost purchasing

429
00:44:05.940 --> 00:44:10.000
power of money incomes received.

430
00:44:10.000 --> 00:44:15.800
Keynes offers no support whatever for his belief that the increment of the world's

431
00:44:15.800 --> 00:44:22.320
World's Wealth has fallen short of the aggregate of positive individual savings.

432
00:44:22.320 --> 00:44:28.720
If this contention is true, it tends to show that the rate of interest, instead of being

433
00:44:28.720 --> 00:44:35.680
chronically too high, as Keynes never tires of repeating, has been chronically too low

434
00:44:35.680 --> 00:44:38.400
to compensate for risks.

435
00:44:38.400 --> 00:44:45.240
But the enormous increase in the world's wealth and the vast accumulation of capital, say,

436
00:44:45.240 --> 00:44:54.680
In America alone, since the landing of the Pilgrims in 1620, hardly support his contention.

437
00:44:54.680 --> 00:45:00.000
The Economic Causes of War

438
00:45:00.000 --> 00:45:06.400
Keynes now follows with a section in which he offers his nastrum as a remedy for removing

439
00:45:06.400 --> 00:45:10.640
the alleged economic causes of war.

440
00:45:10.640 --> 00:45:17.720
Strangely enough, he blames domestic laissez-faire and an international gold standard as the

441
00:45:17.720 --> 00:45:25.920
causes of the competitive struggle for markets, page 382, between nations.

442
00:45:25.920 --> 00:45:31.680
All this, of course, is the exact opposite of the truth.

443
00:45:31.680 --> 00:45:38.160
Under an international gold standard and freedom of trade, there was a competition between

444
00:45:38.160 --> 00:45:45.740
Individuals or between firms for foreign and domestic business, but not between nations

445
00:45:45.740 --> 00:45:48.020
as such.

446
00:45:48.020 --> 00:45:54.780
Several American firms might bid against each other for a foreign contract, and if German

447
00:45:54.780 --> 00:46:00.880
firms were also bidding for it, they would be competing with each other as much as with

448
00:46:00.880 --> 00:46:03.080
the American firms.

449
00:46:03.080 --> 00:46:10.480
It is nationalism, it is the nonsensical concept of a balance of trade that does not take care

450
00:46:10.480 --> 00:46:17.600
of itself but can only be obtained by government intervention that causes the nationalistic

451
00:46:17.600 --> 00:46:20.700
struggle for markets.

452
00:46:20.700 --> 00:46:27.000
Keynes denounces international trade as of the time that he was writing as a desperate

453
00:46:27.000 --> 00:46:33.480
It is quite expedient to maintain employment at home by forcing sales on foreign markets

454
00:46:33.480 --> 00:46:40.520
and restricting purchases, whereas, under Keynesian economics, if nations can learn

455
00:46:40.520 --> 00:46:47.140
to provide themselves with full employment by their domestic policy, there need be no

456
00:46:47.140 --> 00:46:53.760
important economic forces calculated to set the interest of one country against that of

457
00:46:53.760 --> 00:47:03.360
of its Neighbors, p. 382-383 None of this bears much relation to the truth.

458
00:47:03.360 --> 00:47:10.840
Under a system of laissez-faire, i.e. free trade at home and free trade abroad, and an

459
00:47:10.840 --> 00:47:18.360
international gold standard, individuals buy what they need wherever they can get it cheapest.

460
00:47:18.360 --> 00:47:20.880
They sell in the best market.

461
00:47:20.880 --> 00:47:28.760
They do not think nationalistically, and so far as the international gold standard is concerned,

462
00:47:28.760 --> 00:47:34.460
nations can stay on it only by keeping their interest rates and their obligations in terms

463
00:47:34.460 --> 00:47:40.800
of gold in equilibrium with those prevailing in the rest of the world.

464
00:47:40.800 --> 00:47:47.640
It is precisely the Keynesian system, with its nationalistic fixing of interest rates,

465
00:47:47.640 --> 00:47:54.920
with its domestic inflationism and its tricky devaluations of national currencies that turns

466
00:47:54.920 --> 00:48:02.560
the struggle for a favorable balance of trade and for foreign markets into an international

467
00:48:02.560 --> 00:48:03.760
struggle.

468
00:48:03.760 --> 00:48:12.660
And it is precisely because this system seeks to maintain full employment by domestic currency,

469
00:48:12.660 --> 00:48:20.760
Post-Rate and Investment Tricks, by disregarding the imbalance of production so brought about,

470
00:48:20.760 --> 00:48:27.300
and by disregarding the loss from failure to take full advantage of the international division

471
00:48:27.300 --> 00:48:35.160
of labor, that it is also a far less efficient system.

472
00:48:35.160 --> 00:48:39.400
The Power of Ideas

473
00:48:39.400 --> 00:48:46.460
We have been forced to be critical, and sometimes harshly so, about every chapter of Keynes's

474
00:48:46.460 --> 00:48:52.000
general theory and every leading proposition it contains.

475
00:48:52.000 --> 00:48:56.460
I am sorry for this for more reasons than one.

476
00:48:56.460 --> 00:49:02.580
The present book would have been much shorter, the author would have been saved many dreary

477
00:49:02.580 --> 00:49:08.780
hours of analysis, and the reader's time would also have been economized if there were

478
00:49:08.780 --> 00:49:13.980
There are fewer propositions and deductions in the general theory, with which one was

479
00:49:13.980 --> 00:49:17.080
forced to disagree.

480
00:49:17.080 --> 00:49:23.460
So it is with special pleasure that I turn to the final paragraph of the general theory,

481
00:49:23.460 --> 00:49:30.380
for here at last we are able to say that Keynes has written something profoundly true and

482
00:49:30.380 --> 00:49:35.300
wise and memorably eloquent.

483
00:49:35.300 --> 00:49:41.940
The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are

484
00:49:41.940 --> 00:49:46.380
wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood.

485
00:49:46.380 --> 00:49:51.540
Indeed, the world is ruled by a little else.

486
00:49:51.540 --> 00:49:57.700
Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences,

487
00:49:57.700 --> 00:50:02.220
are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.

488
00:50:02.220 --> 00:50:08.540
Mad men in authority who hear voices in the air are distilling their frenzy from some

489
00:50:08.540 --> 00:50:12.380
academic scribbler of a few years back.

490
00:50:12.380 --> 00:50:19.740
I am sure that the power of vested interests is vastly exaggerated compared with the gradual

491
00:50:19.740 --> 00:50:22.580
encroachment of ideas.

492
00:50:22.580 --> 00:50:29.340
Not indeed immediately, but after a certain interval, for in the field of economic and

493
00:50:29.340 --> 00:50:35.660
and Political Philosophy, there are not many who are influenced by new theories after they

494
00:50:35.660 --> 00:50:44.120
are 25 or 30 years of age, so that the ideas which civil servants and politicians and even

495
00:50:44.120 --> 00:50:50.080
agitators apply to current events are not likely to be the newest.

496
00:50:50.080 --> 00:50:57.100
But soon or late, it is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or

497
00:50:57.100 --> 00:50:59.100
evil.

498
00:50:59.100 --> 00:51:06.140
And what a crowning irony that the defunct economist and academic scribbler of a few

499
00:51:06.140 --> 00:51:14.140
years back, whose ideas are being applied by civil servants and politicians and agitators,

500
00:51:14.140 --> 00:51:19.620
should now be none other than John Maynard Keynes himself.