WEBVTT

NOTE Appendix A: The 1919 Prophecies

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.000
Appendix A. The 1919 Prophecies

2
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:14.000
A few months ago, the London economist remarked that

3
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:21.880
That, many people will be turning to read or re-read Lord Keynes's The Economic Consequences

4
00:00:21.880 --> 00:00:23.560
of the Peace.

5
00:00:23.560 --> 00:00:30.120
They will find the task rewarding, not so much for the brilliant analysis of the economic

6
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:38.960
consequences as for the inspired account of the Peace itself and the process of its making.

7
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:46.640
There are passages in it which, in the setting of today, have an almost frightening urgency.

8
00:00:46.640 --> 00:00:53.180
The passages to which the economist referred include the picture of Europe at the end of

9
00:00:53.180 --> 00:01:01.080
World War I, almost completely lost from sight in piecemeal settlement and in empty and arid

10
00:01:01.080 --> 00:01:03.280
intrigue.

11
00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:11.000
Here was a matter of life and death, of starvation and existence, and of the fearful convulsions

12
00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:14.160
of a dying civilization.

13
00:01:14.160 --> 00:01:22.840
Here was Europe forgotten yet deeply and inextricably intertwined, victors and defeated alike, by

14
00:01:22.840 --> 00:01:27.000
hidden psychic and economic bonds.

15
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:33.800
The Economist referred also to the picture of the World War I peacemakers themselves,

16
00:01:33.800 --> 00:01:41.040
the portrayal of the complex struggle of human will and purpose, concentrated in the persons

17
00:01:41.040 --> 00:01:49.160
of four individuals in a manner never paralleled, the portrait of the righteous President Wilson

18
00:01:49.160 --> 00:01:56.480
refusing to discuss the final decisions lest he should thereby be shaken in his faith that,

19
00:01:56.480 --> 00:02:03.360
In the sweat of solitary contemplation, and with prayers to God, he had done nothing that

20
00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:05.600
was not just and right.

21
00:02:05.600 --> 00:02:13.280
It was the task of the Peace Conference, wrote Keynes, to honor engagements and to satisfy

22
00:02:13.280 --> 00:02:19.860
justice, but not less, to re-establish life and to heal wounds.

23
00:02:19.860 --> 00:02:25.480
And neither part of the task, he concluded, had been performed.

24
00:02:25.480 --> 00:02:32.000
When we turn back to the economic consequences of the piece and look at it again in the light

25
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:38.960
of twenty-five years' experience and perspective, with the added illumination brought by the

26
00:02:38.960 --> 00:02:45.640
striking parallel in some respects between conditions at the time it was written and

27
00:02:45.640 --> 00:02:52.380
conditions today, we still find it undeniably a brilliant piece of writing.

28
00:02:52.380 --> 00:02:59.460
The most fascinating section is still chapter 3, in which the personalities of the big three

29
00:02:59.460 --> 00:03:09.460
of that time, Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Wilson, are described in unforgettable terms.

30
00:03:09.460 --> 00:03:16.020
Clemenceau, with his weary cynicism, sitting with closed eyes and an impassive face of

31
00:03:16.020 --> 00:03:21.020
of Parchment, his gray-gloved hands clasped in front of him,

32
00:03:21.020 --> 00:03:25.540
awaking to sudden outbursts only when the interests of France

33
00:03:25.540 --> 00:03:27.860
were directly concerned.

34
00:03:27.860 --> 00:03:33.380
Lloyd George, with his unerring, almost medium-like sensibility

35
00:03:33.380 --> 00:03:39.220
to everyone immediately around him, with six or seven senses not

36
00:03:39.220 --> 00:03:43.900
available to ordinary men, judging character, motive,

37
00:03:43.900 --> 00:03:51.900
and subconscious impulse, perceiving what each was thinking and even what each was going to say next,

38
00:03:51.900 --> 00:04:03.400
and compounding with telepathic instinct the argument or appeal best suited to the vanity, weakness, or self-interest of his immediate auditor.

39
00:04:03.400 --> 00:04:11.400
And finally, the poor President Wilson himself, playing blind man's bluff in that party,

40
00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:20.680
A blind and deaf Don Quixote, like a nonconformist minister, perhaps a Presbyterian, rigid, with

41
00:04:20.680 --> 00:04:27.840
a temperament theological rather than intellectual, appallingly incompetent in the agilities of

42
00:04:27.840 --> 00:04:35.840
the council chamber, and Lloyd George desiring at the last moment all the moderation he dared,

43
00:04:35.840 --> 00:04:42.040
According to his horror that it was harder to de-bamboozle this old Presbyterian than

44
00:04:42.040 --> 00:04:45.660
it had been to bamboozle him.

45
00:04:45.660 --> 00:04:50.080
These portraits are as vivid as those of Lytton Strachey.

46
00:04:50.080 --> 00:04:56.160
It is interesting to recall that Strachey dedicated one of his early volumes to Keynes.

47
00:04:56.160 --> 00:05:02.760
But, like Strachey's, there is also a little trace of the smart aleck in them.

48
00:05:02.760 --> 00:05:09.760
This trace is even more pronounced in a well-known passage in the book in which Keynes contemptuously

49
00:05:09.760 --> 00:05:17.480
compares modern railroads to the pyramids of Egypt and ridicules the capitalistic cake

50
00:05:17.480 --> 00:05:24.640
which must always grow and never be enjoyed, a passage calculated to delight gourmets of

51
00:05:24.640 --> 00:05:30.180
paradox but easily demolished by serious argument.

52
00:05:30.180 --> 00:05:34.380
This brings us to the economic sections of the book.

53
00:05:34.380 --> 00:05:40.880
For a quarter of a century now, Lord Keynes, on the basis of this work, has ranked in some

54
00:05:40.880 --> 00:05:43.740
circles as a major prophet.

55
00:05:43.740 --> 00:05:50.020
On the surface, indeed, his prophecies seemed to be uncannily accurate.

56
00:05:50.020 --> 00:05:56.380
At a time when allied statesmen were talking of reparations claims that would have reached

57
00:06:26.380 --> 00:06:30.820
the best for more than a very few years.

58
00:06:30.820 --> 00:06:38.020
What actually happened was that after endless conferences, the reparations claims were steadily

59
00:06:38.020 --> 00:06:46.380
scaled down until, under the Young Plan in 1929, they reached almost exactly the five

60
00:06:46.380 --> 00:06:55.640
hundred million dollars annually that Keynes had seen in 1919 as the maximum collectible.

61
00:06:55.640 --> 00:07:02.480
In the end, even these were not paid, nor were the inter-allied loans either.

62
00:07:02.480 --> 00:07:10.640
The whole process was brought to an abrupt end by President Hoover's moratorium in 1931

63
00:07:10.640 --> 00:07:13.080
and never revived.

64
00:07:13.080 --> 00:07:18.080
Could a profit ever have had clearer vindication?

65
00:07:18.080 --> 00:07:21.600
But a few questions uptrued themselves.

66
00:07:21.600 --> 00:07:28.840
Does the fact that Germany did not pay on net balance practically any reparations at all

67
00:07:28.840 --> 00:07:32.340
prove that she could not have paid them?

68
00:07:32.340 --> 00:07:39.080
The German reparations were unintentionally paid, in fact, chiefly by trusting American

69
00:07:39.080 --> 00:07:41.360
investors.

70
00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:47.960
And were the reasons why German reparations and inter-allied war debts bogged down the

71
00:07:47.960 --> 00:07:52.720
the same as the reasons why Mr. Keynes thought they would?

72
00:07:52.720 --> 00:07:55.920
The evidence does not show it.

73
00:07:55.920 --> 00:08:02.920
Let us look at the size of the reparations ultimately asked for under the Young Plan.

74
00:08:02.920 --> 00:08:10.740
At an annual level of around $500 million or $2 billion gold marks, they were less than

75
00:08:10.740 --> 00:08:18.940
and 4% of the total German national income and less than a fifth even of the pre-Hitler

76
00:08:18.940 --> 00:08:24.580
and post-inflation annual government expenditures.

77
00:08:24.580 --> 00:08:29.460
It would be absurd to call such a burden crushing.

78
00:08:29.460 --> 00:08:33.280
Where did Keynes's arguments go astray?

79
00:08:33.280 --> 00:08:40.680
He was right in seeing that all reparations would have to be paid, ultimately not in cash,

80
00:08:40.680 --> 00:08:47.720
in Goods and Services, that is to say, in a German export excess.

81
00:08:47.720 --> 00:08:54.000
He was right in contending that a world that insisted on reparations would have to open

82
00:08:54.000 --> 00:08:57.600
its doors to imports from Germany.

83
00:08:57.600 --> 00:09:04.400
But he was wrong in arguing that Germany's ability to produce this export excess was

84
00:09:04.400 --> 00:09:08.600
to be measured by her pre-war trade balance.

85
00:09:08.600 --> 00:09:15.800
He was wrong in this effort to give an itemized demonstration of Germany's inability to reach

86
00:09:15.800 --> 00:09:19.260
a high export surplus.

87
00:09:19.260 --> 00:09:25.220
He was wrong in assuming that the effects of this export surplus would be just like

88
00:09:25.220 --> 00:09:29.080
those of any other export surplus.

89
00:09:29.080 --> 00:09:35.840
For his whole discussion overlooks the obvious fact that Germany, in sending this export

90
00:09:35.840 --> 00:09:42.160
Surplus would also be sending to the allied countries the purchasing power with which

91
00:09:42.160 --> 00:09:44.440
to buy it.

92
00:09:44.440 --> 00:09:51.200
The transfer of goods in the absence of barriers to imports on the part of the allied governments

93
00:09:51.200 --> 00:09:57.880
would have followed as a natural consequence of the transfer of cash to pay for them.

94
00:09:57.880 --> 00:10:05.200
Finally, he too often forgot that the war damage had actually been done.

95
00:10:05.200 --> 00:10:12.960
Insofar as Germany failed to pay for reparations, her victims would have to do so.

96
00:10:12.960 --> 00:10:20.320
The blunt fact is that when the Allies permitted the reparations payments to stop, they enabled

97
00:10:20.320 --> 00:10:27.040
Germany to use the money thus saved for an immense armament program to launch against

98
00:10:27.040 --> 00:10:31.520
them the most destructive war in history.

99
00:10:31.520 --> 00:10:38.940
But it was partly because the world suffered from importphobia and was influenced by Keynes's

100
00:10:38.940 --> 00:10:46.680
neo-mercantilist arguments that it was willing to grant that Germany could not pay the reparations.

101
00:10:46.680 --> 00:10:50.360
This gave Germany the excuse for default.

102
00:10:50.360 --> 00:10:57.320
The influence of Keynes's own arguments, in short, was partly responsible for the success

103
00:10:57.320 --> 00:11:00.060
of his predictions.

104
00:11:00.060 --> 00:11:07.340
That influence remains to this day, so that the Yalta announcement, for example, talks

105
00:11:07.340 --> 00:11:10.820
only of reparations in kind.

106
00:11:10.820 --> 00:11:17.620
Actually, if there is a willingness on the part of the victors to receive goods, there

107
00:11:17.620 --> 00:11:24.980
is no essential economic difference between reparations in kind or in cash, except that

108
00:11:24.980 --> 00:11:28.100
the latter are more flexible.

109
00:11:28.100 --> 00:11:35.080
In each case there must be a transfer both of actual goods and of the cash values that

110
00:11:35.080 --> 00:11:36.920
they represent.

111
00:11:36.920 --> 00:11:46.240
Keynes's own proposals for reparation settlement are not entirely free from disingenuousness.

112
00:11:46.240 --> 00:11:53.600
He proposed, for example, a total indemnity for Germany of $10 billion.

113
00:11:53.600 --> 00:12:01.080
He then suggested that Germany be given a credit against this of $2.5 billion for the

114
00:12:01.080 --> 00:12:08.480
surrender of merchant ships, cables, war materials and other items.

115
00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:16.760
The balance of $7.5 billion, he adds, should not carry interest pending its repayment and

116
00:12:16.760 --> 00:12:28.120
should be paid by Germany in 30 annual installments of $250 million beginning in 1923.

117
00:12:28.120 --> 00:12:34.440
This is not only half the annual sum that Keynes had conceded earlier in his book that

118
00:12:34.440 --> 00:12:41.320
Germany might pay, but it is not $7.5 billion.

119
00:12:41.320 --> 00:12:50.800
The present value of 30 annual installments of $250 million beginning 3 years hence, the

120
00:12:50.800 --> 00:12:59.560
economic consequences appeared late in 1919, on an assumed interest rate of 5% is less

121
00:12:59.560 --> 00:13:02.960
than $3.5 billion.

122
00:13:02.960 --> 00:13:10.120
In other words, on the usual interest rate assumptions, Mr. Keynes was actually suggesting

123
00:13:10.120 --> 00:13:18.360
A capital payment from Germany of approximately half of $7.5 billion.

124
00:13:18.360 --> 00:13:25.120
A fresh reading of Lord Keynes's old book reminds us of one thing more.

125
00:13:25.120 --> 00:13:33.280
It is oversimplification, if not naive melodrama, to assume that America failed to enter the

126
00:13:33.280 --> 00:13:42.160
The League of Nations and turned isolationist after 1920 because a few wicked old reactionaries

127
00:13:42.160 --> 00:13:48.200
like Senator Lodge and President Harding prevented us.

128
00:13:48.200 --> 00:13:53.800
On the contrary, the drive against the Treaty of Versailles, which embodied the League of

129
00:13:53.800 --> 00:14:01.960
Nations, was led by the then left-wing liberals under the leadership of Keynes and his economic

130
00:14:01.960 --> 00:14:04.200
CONSEQUENCES OF THE PEACE.

131
00:14:04.200 --> 00:14:12.200
"'This is a very great book,' exclaimed Harold Lasky in his review in The Nation.

132
00:14:12.200 --> 00:14:20.040
"'If any answer can be made to the overwhelming indictment of the treaty that it contains,

133
00:14:20.040 --> 00:14:23.080
that answer has yet to be published.'

134
00:14:23.080 --> 00:14:26.200
The New Republic took up the cry.

135
00:14:26.200 --> 00:14:31.360
Its reviewer found the book like a fresh breeze coming into a plane

136
00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:35.040
where poisonous gases are yet hanging.

137
00:14:35.040 --> 00:14:40.640
The League was rejected as the mere instrument of a vicious treaty.

138
00:14:40.640 --> 00:14:43.060
The lesson is twofold.

139
00:14:43.060 --> 00:14:48.360
The liberals of today would do well to be something less than perfectionists in their

140
00:14:48.360 --> 00:14:49.860
demands.

141
00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:56.000
But the framers of the new treaties, in their turn, should try to establish a peace that

142
00:14:56.000 --> 00:15:02.000
recognizes the economic interdependence of Europe and of the world.

143
00:15:02.000 --> 00:15:08.360
A piece that, while it meets the demands of justice and prevents another aggression, will

144
00:15:08.360 --> 00:15:15.240
be of such a nature that humane and liberal public opinion in the democracies, when the

145
00:15:15.240 --> 00:15:19.760
passions of war have cooled, will still be willing to support it.
