WEBVTT

NOTE War and Inflation: The Monetary Process and Implications

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
As Bert said, I'm going to be talking about war and its connection with inflation.

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:10.000
Wars have invariably been financed by printing money since the invention of paper money.

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:16.000
Indeed, it might be said that paper fiat money and central banks were invented mainly to finance wars.

4
00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:22.000
The first irredeemable paper currency in the Western world was issued in 1690 by the British colony of Massachusetts

5
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:28.000
in order to pay its soldiers in its sporadic wars of plunder against the French colony of Quebec.

6
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:34.040
The first central bank in history, the Bank of England, was established in 1694 to finance

7
00:00:34.040 --> 00:00:38.640
the mercantilist and imperialist foreign policy of the Whig Party that had gained control

8
00:00:38.640 --> 00:00:39.640
of the British government.

9
00:00:39.640 --> 00:00:45.240
In order to explain the seemingly inherent propensity of governments to finance war by

10
00:00:45.240 --> 00:00:50.680
monetary inflation, it is necessary to clearly comprehend the true nature of war.

11
00:00:50.680 --> 00:00:57.440
This is not an easy task because commentaries on war, stretching back more than two millennia

12
00:00:57.440 --> 00:01:02.760
to the Peloponnesian Wars have enshrouded the fundamental causes and implications of

13
00:01:02.760 --> 00:01:10.840
wars in an almost impenetrable fog of myths, fallacies and lies. Most significantly, war

14
00:01:10.840 --> 00:01:18.520
is portrayed as the inevitable outcome of complex historical forces and circumstances

15
00:01:18.520 --> 00:01:24.080
beyond the control of its human participants. Fortunately, there exists a well-developed

16
00:01:24.080 --> 00:01:27.960
of Science of Human Action which encompasses economics.

17
00:01:27.960 --> 00:01:30.880
This science is sometimes referred to as praxeology

18
00:01:30.880 --> 00:01:36.080
and allows us to analyze and dispel this mythology of war.

19
00:01:36.080 --> 00:01:37.560
The basic conclusion of this science

20
00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:41.520
is that war is the objective outcome of the human endeavor

21
00:01:41.520 --> 00:01:43.240
to make war.

22
00:01:43.240 --> 00:01:45.320
As a human activity like any other,

23
00:01:45.320 --> 00:01:49.600
war making is a product of reason, purpose, and choice.

24
00:01:49.600 --> 00:01:52.440
The praxeological analysis of war

25
00:01:52.440 --> 00:01:57.440
takes into account the goals of the war makers and the means at their disposal, the benefits

26
00:01:57.440 --> 00:02:02.720
they anticipate from the war, and the costs they expect to incur in executing it. It also

27
00:02:02.720 --> 00:02:08.280
distinguishes between the beneficiaries and the victims of the war, who may coexist in

28
00:02:08.280 --> 00:02:13.200
the same territory controlled by an organization of war makers, which is historically almost

29
00:02:13.200 --> 00:02:17.960
always a national government. Given that war makers are national governments, which are

30
00:02:17.960 --> 00:02:20.720
are non-productive organizations by nature.

31
00:02:20.720 --> 00:02:26.280
The resources needed to wage war must be extracted from producers.

32
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:31.920
Economics demonstrates who bears the losses of real wealth and income seized by the war-makers

33
00:02:31.920 --> 00:02:36.360
and the means the war-makers use to conceal these losses from their victims.

34
00:02:36.360 --> 00:02:39.400
And this will be my theme.

35
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:43.520
Waging war requires that scarce resources previously devoted to producing consumer and

36
00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:49.520
and Capital Goods be diverted to producing tanks, missiles, fighter jets, and other war goods.

37
00:02:49.520 --> 00:02:57.520
And to give you an example of a modern war and what needs to be produced during a modern war,

38
00:02:57.520 --> 00:03:06.520
in World War II, from 1940 to 1945, there were produced 86,000 tanks, this is the United States,

39
00:03:06.520 --> 00:03:15.800
States, 297,000 airplanes, 17,400,000 rifles, carbines and sidearms, 315,000 pieces of field

40
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:24.800
artillery and mortars, 4,200,000 tons of artillery shells, 41,400,000,000 rounds of small arms

41
00:03:24.800 --> 00:03:33.200
ammunition, 64,000 landing vessels, 6,500 other naval ships, 5,400 cargo ships and transports

42
00:03:33.200 --> 00:03:40.880
and vast amounts of other munitions, which means that all of these things displace resources

43
00:03:40.880 --> 00:03:47.560
or require resources that would have produced consumer goods and capital goods.

44
00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:52.600
So in addition to all of this, part of the labor force formerly employed in consumer

45
00:03:52.600 --> 00:03:56.480
and capital goods industries must be shifted into the armed forces, where they must continue

46
00:03:56.480 --> 00:04:02.240
to be fed, clothed and sheltered, as well as equipped with the armaments I mentioned.

47
00:04:02.240 --> 00:04:07.920
This means that non-specific resources, resources like labor and capital goods, such as steel,

48
00:04:07.920 --> 00:04:14.400
electric power and means of transportation that have many different uses, must be reallocated

49
00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:17.920
to production for military purposes.

50
00:04:17.920 --> 00:04:22.780
The inevitable result of this reduction of the civilian labor force and the conversion

51
00:04:22.780 --> 00:04:28.240
of a substantial amount of labor and capital to the manufacture of military hardware is

52
00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:33.240
is a greater scarcity of consumer goods, and therefore lowered real wages and living standards.

53
00:04:33.240 --> 00:04:38.240
Okay, so as we'll see, war definitely does not breed prosperity. Okay.

54
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:46.240
However, the transition to a war economy requires more than the horizontal shift of resources involved in substituting military production

55
00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:52.240
for the production of peacetime consumer goods. A war economy also entails a vertical shift of resources

56
00:04:52.240 --> 00:05:11.240
In other words, the production and maintenance of capital goods that are destined to satisfy consumer demands in the future are drastically curtailed in order to expand the supply of military goods for immediate use in warfare.

57
00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:17.280
Warfare. In effect, tanks, missiles, field rations and uniforms are substituted for the

58
00:05:17.280 --> 00:05:22.160
repair and renewal of industrial plant and equipment necessary to maintain the future

59
00:05:22.160 --> 00:05:24.640
flow of consumer goods.

60
00:05:24.640 --> 00:05:30.000
In stark terms, the war economy literally consumes society's capital stock, apart from

61
00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:35.120
any physical destruction the war itself may cause. Stocks of raw materials and semi-finished

62
00:05:35.120 --> 00:05:40.440
products, which constitute a large portion of the economy's capital stock, are used

63
00:05:40.440 --> 00:05:45.640
First up and never replaced, the steel mills and power plants are run at maximum capacity

64
00:05:45.640 --> 00:05:51.200
and undergo progressive deterioration because the manpower machinery previously devoted

65
00:05:51.200 --> 00:05:56.460
to making repairs and manufacturing spare parts are now at work churning out the present

66
00:05:56.460 --> 00:06:01.540
goods consumed by those waging war. Since real wages are determined by the amount of

67
00:06:01.540 --> 00:06:07.140
capital per worker in the economy, the civilian labor force and their dependents become progressively

68
00:06:07.140 --> 00:06:37.140
Let me turn to financing a war. Modern governments that rule over market societies have at their disposal three methods for financing war. Taxation, borrowing from the public, and creating new money. They may also resort to the pre-modern practice of coercively requisitioning

69
00:06:37.140 --> 00:06:40.140
In the modern world, this really just works with labor services.

70
00:06:40.140 --> 00:06:44.140
If you try to just seize the resources that you need without paying for them,

71
00:06:44.140 --> 00:06:47.140
that destroys the incentive for private firms and so on,

72
00:06:47.140 --> 00:06:50.140
to continue to produce such things.

73
00:06:50.140 --> 00:06:52.140
In the wars of the last two centuries,

74
00:06:52.140 --> 00:06:56.140
a combination of these three methods has generally been important

75
00:06:56.140 --> 00:06:58.140
in the history of the United States,

76
00:06:58.140 --> 00:07:01.140
and in the history of the United States of America,

77
00:07:01.140 --> 00:07:04.140
and in the history of the United States of America,

78
00:07:04.140 --> 00:07:12.140
The creation of these three methods has generally been employed to bring about the large-scale transfer of resources from civilian to military uses.

79
00:07:13.140 --> 00:07:29.140
From the point of view of technical economic theory, however, it is no more difficult for government to squeeze a given quantity of goods out of the private economy entirely by taxing than it is to acquire these same goods by combining taxation with creating money and borrowing.

80
00:07:29.140 --> 00:07:50.140
Why is it, then, if strictly fiscal measures, that is, taxing, would always yield sufficient revenues to pay market prices for the resources needed to wage war, that belligerent governments have almost always resorted to deficit spending, printing money and directly commandeering commodities and services?

81
00:07:50.140 --> 00:07:55.640
The answer to this question lies in the fact that modern war is an extremely costly enterprise

82
00:07:55.640 --> 00:08:01.640
that imposes severe losses of real income and wealth on the civilian population, the victims of the war makers.

83
00:08:01.640 --> 00:08:08.140
Taxation makes these losses immediately evident to those who must endure them.

84
00:08:08.140 --> 00:08:15.140
In contrast, deficit spending financed by money and the drafting of men into the military at below market wages

85
00:08:15.140 --> 00:08:20.140
Each in their own way contributes to concealing these losses from the civilian population

86
00:08:20.140 --> 00:08:26.140
by distorting monetary calculation and postponing the day of true reckoning of the losses of war.

87
00:08:26.140 --> 00:08:33.140
When the public is accurately informed about the full costs they bear, war becomes increasingly unpopular.

88
00:08:33.140 --> 00:08:40.140
This even happened in World War II in the United States after 1943 or so.

89
00:08:40.140 --> 00:08:49.140
Civilian enthusiasm and labor efforts weighing in unrest and even resistance may result on the home front and spread to the front lines.

90
00:08:49.140 --> 00:08:58.140
As Mises wrote in 1919, in every great, and I'm quoting him, in every great war monetary calculation was disrupted by inflation.

91
00:08:58.140 --> 00:09:02.140
The economic behavior of the belligerents was thereby led astray.

92
00:09:02.140 --> 00:09:06.140
The true consequences of the war were removed from their view.

93
00:09:06.140 --> 00:09:10.940
One can say without exaggeration that inflation is an indispensable means of militarism.

94
00:09:10.940 --> 00:09:17.740
Without it, the repercussions of war on welfare become obvious much more quickly and penetratingly.

95
00:09:17.740 --> 00:09:22.380
War weariness would set in much earlier."

96
00:09:22.380 --> 00:09:27.420
More recently, the libertarian historian, economic historian Robert Higgs,

97
00:09:27.420 --> 00:09:31.820
pointed out a similar rationale for governments to partially substitute

98
00:09:31.820 --> 00:09:40.220
an inflationary command and control economy for the regular fiscal mechanism of taxation during wartime and other national emergencies.

99
00:09:40.220 --> 00:09:41.620
Quoting Professor Higgs,

100
00:09:41.620 --> 00:09:46.720
Obviously all citizens will not react to the costs they bear if they are unaware of them.

101
00:09:46.720 --> 00:09:51.720
The possibility of driving a wedge between the actual and the publicly perceived costs

102
00:09:51.720 --> 00:09:57.820
creates a strong temptation for governments pursuing high cost policies during national emergencies.

103
00:09:57.820 --> 00:10:00.920
Except where lives are being sacrificed,

104
00:10:00.920 --> 00:10:05.320
No costs are so easily counted as pecuniary costs, money costs.

105
00:10:05.320 --> 00:10:09.220
Not only can each individual count them in his own tax bill,

106
00:10:09.220 --> 00:10:14.720
they can easily be aggregated for the whole society through government's total tax revenue.

107
00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:20.220
It behooves the government wishing to sustain a policy that entails suddenly heightened costs

108
00:10:20.220 --> 00:10:25.220
to find ways of substituting non-pecuniary for pecuniary costs.

109
00:10:25.220 --> 00:10:30.720
The substitution may blunt the citizen's realization of how great their sacrifices really are

110
00:10:30.720 --> 00:10:36.560
and hence diminish their protests and resistance."

111
00:10:36.560 --> 00:10:40.800
Let me talk now about financing war by taxation.

112
00:10:40.800 --> 00:10:43.960
Thus, the creation of new money has become the preferred method for government

113
00:10:43.960 --> 00:10:46.840
to hide the losses of income and wealth from its citizens.

114
00:10:46.840 --> 00:10:50.160
These losses are particularly visible at the outbreak of a war

115
00:10:50.160 --> 00:10:53.080
when higher taxes are employed to finance it.

116
00:10:53.080 --> 00:10:56.640
Ratcheting up taxes to confiscatory levels

117
00:10:56.640 --> 00:10:59.880
not only depresses current income and living standards

118
00:10:59.880 --> 00:11:04.040
but also brings about a crisis in which financial markets plummet

119
00:11:04.040 --> 00:11:08.440
and the real economy is plunged into a recession.

120
00:11:08.440 --> 00:11:11.840
What we might call a war mobilization crisis

121
00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:15.560
occurs for three reasons when war is financed by taxation.

122
00:11:15.560 --> 00:11:19.000
First, in order to pay for their increased tax liabilities,

123
00:11:19.000 --> 00:11:22.480
citizens cut back on their saving as well as their present consumption.

124
00:11:22.480 --> 00:11:26.720
However, because the increase in taxes depresses their current incomes

125
00:11:26.720 --> 00:11:31.160
and Living Standards, the taxpayers sharply increase their time preferences,

126
00:11:31.160 --> 00:11:34.040
meaning that they become much less willing to postpone their consumption

127
00:11:34.040 --> 00:11:38.240
from the immediate to the more or less remote future, okay?

128
00:11:38.240 --> 00:11:41.920
So people tend to give less care to the future during more time.

129
00:11:41.920 --> 00:11:45.800
And this is a direct result of the heavy cost that they bear.

130
00:11:45.800 --> 00:11:49.000
As a result, aggregate saving falls proportionally more

131
00:11:49.000 --> 00:11:51.840
than spending on present consumption.

132
00:11:51.840 --> 00:11:55.320
This disproportionate effect of increased taxation on saving

133
00:11:55.320 --> 00:12:01.000
is aggravated by a second factor. The rise in tax rates on interest income lowers the net interest

134
00:12:01.000 --> 00:12:05.560
return on saving, meaning that the consumer can now expect to receive fewer dollars of future

135
00:12:05.560 --> 00:12:11.480
consumption for every dollar of present consumption sacrificed. The worsened terms of trade between

136
00:12:11.480 --> 00:12:16.920
present and future goods encourages the taxpayer to escape the tax by further increasing consumption

137
00:12:16.920 --> 00:12:23.880
and decreasing saving for future consumption. Finally, on the spending side, the additional tax

138
00:12:23.880 --> 00:12:36.880
The tax revenues extracted by the war makers from the private economy, some of which would have been saved, are almost all spent on present goods for military operations and to sustain the domestic war bureaucracy.

139
00:12:36.880 --> 00:12:46.880
So basically there's a tremendous decline in saving and a big increase in consumption both for war and civilian purposes during wartime.

140
00:12:46.880 --> 00:12:50.880
And this has a very deleterious effect on our capital stock.

141
00:12:50.880 --> 00:13:01.880
Overall then, war taxation induces a general rise in time preferences, which is reflected in the aggregate, an increase in the aggregate amount of consumption compared to saving.

142
00:13:01.880 --> 00:13:07.880
The resulting decline in the supply of savings drives up interest rates and chokes off business investment in capital goods.

143
00:13:07.880 --> 00:13:19.880
There is an abrupt and radical shift of expenditure flows from industries providing for the maintenance, repair and replacement of capital goods to industries producing present military and consumer goods.

144
00:13:19.880 --> 00:13:30.880
The precipitous decline in the demand for capital goods drives some firms out of business and forces others to abandon new investment projects and to severely contract their operations and labor forces.

145
00:13:30.880 --> 00:13:35.880
This is especially true of firms producing durable capital goods or inputs into these goods.

146
00:13:35.880 --> 00:13:45.880
The other side of the coin is a vast expansion of the demand for present goods and high prices and profits for firms manufacturing armaments and other goods for military consumption.

147
00:13:45.880 --> 00:13:59.880
Capital consumption and a retrogressing economy are the outcome of this rapid and unanticipated readjustment of the economy's production structure towards present consumption on a scale required by modern war.

148
00:13:59.880 --> 00:14:14.880
The consumption of capital is manifested in abandoned factories, machineries, mines and commercial building sites that were originally constructed to provide consumer goods in the future and that cannot be easily converted into immediate military uses.

149
00:14:14.880 --> 00:14:24.480
The reason is that the complementary labor, energy and raw materials are no longer available at prices that make the continued use of these capital goods profitable.

150
00:14:24.480 --> 00:14:29.080
They're now being used and being paid much higher prices to produce armaments and so on.

151
00:14:29.080 --> 00:14:35.880
This destruction of capital, and again it's not a physical destruction, is caused by the transition to a war economy.

152
00:14:35.880 --> 00:14:44.680
And results in a retrogressing economy, meaning an economy that becomes poorer and poorer, that features falling labor productivity and real wages.

153
00:14:44.680 --> 00:14:49.200
and also business losses, aggregate business losses for the entire economy.

154
00:14:49.200 --> 00:14:56.440
It's really only the munitions makers that are making money and other consumer goods industries.

155
00:14:56.440 --> 00:15:03.960
So in any case, this war mobilization crisis is quickly and clearly revealed to a panicked public by monetary calculation

156
00:15:03.960 --> 00:15:08.320
as interest rates skyrocket and the price of the financial assets collapse.

157
00:15:08.320 --> 00:15:14.280
The quick reaction of financial markets stems from the fact that stocks and bonds are prorated shares of ownership

158
00:15:14.280 --> 00:15:19.440
to existing complementary capital goods, which we call business firms.

159
00:15:19.440 --> 00:15:25.800
The decrease in the prices of existing capital goods therefore coincides with a fall in the value of firms,

160
00:15:25.800 --> 00:15:29.320
especially those producing durable capital goods.

161
00:15:29.320 --> 00:15:33.320
These capital losses are in turn imputed to the titles of ownership to these firms.

162
00:15:33.320 --> 00:15:35.760
Basically, they're stocks and bonds.

163
00:15:35.760 --> 00:15:40.800
The collapse of the financial markets is also accompanied by a depreciation of real estate

164
00:15:40.800 --> 00:15:46.680
because commercial and industrial construction and land sites represent particularly durable resources

165
00:15:46.680 --> 00:15:53.440
whose capital values are extremely sensitive to the higher discount on future goods.

166
00:15:53.440 --> 00:16:00.240
Now, the government can also try to replace taxation by borrowing from the public without inflation.

167
00:16:00.240 --> 00:16:04.800
When the government tries to borrow, when it substitutes borrowing from the public for higher tax levies,

168
00:16:04.800 --> 00:16:07.920
it only makes the crisis worse.

169
00:16:07.920 --> 00:16:09.600
The reason is straightforward.

170
00:16:09.600 --> 00:16:14.300
Raising war revenues through taxation falls on both consumption and saving,

171
00:16:14.300 --> 00:16:17.900
although it does disproportionately burden saving.

172
00:16:17.900 --> 00:16:22.600
In contrast, government borrowing directly and specifically taps saving.

173
00:16:22.600 --> 00:16:27.300
When selling its securities, the government competes with business for the public saved funds,

174
00:16:27.300 --> 00:16:31.300
and because it is capable of bidding up the interest rate,

175
00:16:31.300 --> 00:16:34.700
it is willing to pay to practically any level,

176
00:16:34.700 --> 00:16:38.300
the government can obtain all the funds it desires.

177
00:16:38.300 --> 00:16:47.300
By thus crowding out private business investment, government borrowing ensures that the entire burden of adjustment to a war economy is borne solely by the capital goods industries.

178
00:16:47.300 --> 00:16:54.300
This method of war finance therefore results in an even greater consumption of capital and a more severe crisis than tax financing.

179
00:16:54.300 --> 00:16:57.300
Now let me give you some examples of these crises I've been talking about.

180
00:16:57.300 --> 00:17:04.300
Historically, even the prospect of enormous government borrowing for war has caused financial crises.

181
00:17:04.300 --> 00:17:14.300
For example, on the eve of World War I between July 23rd and July 31st, 1914 and before any of the soon to be belligerent states had gone off the gold standard,

182
00:17:14.300 --> 00:17:22.300
panic selling forced the closing of all major stock exchanges from St. Petersburg in Vienna to Toronto in New York.

183
00:17:22.300 --> 00:17:30.300
This event was primarily response to expectations of heavy government borrowing to finance war mobilization under the non-inflationary conditions of the gold standard.

184
00:17:30.300 --> 00:17:34.300
In other words, people didn't realize at the time that all governments would go off the gold standard

185
00:17:34.300 --> 00:17:37.300
and begin to use paper money to finance the war.

186
00:17:37.300 --> 00:17:41.300
European governments swiftly responded to the crisis by imposing debt moratoria,

187
00:17:41.300 --> 00:17:45.300
allowing people not to have to pay off their debts, especially banks,

188
00:17:45.300 --> 00:17:48.300
and advancing inflationary bank credit.

189
00:17:48.300 --> 00:17:55.300
The war mobilization crisis also roiled U.S. financial markets leading up to and during World War II.

190
00:17:55.300 --> 00:18:09.300
Using Robert Higgs' calculations, the transition to the war economy involved a heavy dose of capital consumption, as real private gross investment in the U.S. economy fell by 64% between 1941 and 1943.

191
00:18:09.300 --> 00:18:21.300
During the four years of the war, it never exceeded 55% of the 1941 level. As we would expect, consumption also declined to make room for military production, but by considerably less than investment.

192
00:18:21.300 --> 00:18:28.300
and Investment. From 1941 to 1943, per capita consumption declined by 6%. By 1945, it was

193
00:18:28.300 --> 00:18:35.140
still 1.7% below the 1941 level. Now, this massive readjustment in the U.S. economy towards

194
00:18:35.140 --> 00:18:40.100
the production of present military goods was manifested in the stock market. You can remember

195
00:18:40.100 --> 00:18:43.980
we were coming out of a depression, or we were still in a depression at the start of

196
00:18:43.980 --> 00:18:50.700
the war. So, stock prices were still very low. From 1939 to 1942, the Standard and Poor's

197
00:18:50.700 --> 00:19:09.700
The market value of all stocks on registered stock exchanges during the same period fell by a whopping 62 percent, and in 1944 still remained 14 percent below the 1939 level.

198
00:19:09.700 --> 00:19:15.700
Okay, now let me get to financing the war, the reasons for financing war by money creation.

199
00:19:15.700 --> 00:19:29.700
As I noted above, regardless of the fiscal technique or combination of techniques, borrowing, taxation, and so on, economic calculation immediately reveals the enormous consumption of real wealth and income that is entailed in mobilizing for a large-scale war.

200
00:19:29.700 --> 00:19:36.700
People recognize right away falling stock market, huge business losses, and so on.

201
00:19:36.700 --> 00:19:43.700
However, economic calculation can be distorted and the crisis postponed by creating money to pay for the war.

202
00:19:43.700 --> 00:19:48.700
This is why governments regularly resort to this device to finance a large proportion of war expenditures.

203
00:19:48.700 --> 00:19:57.700
One of the main reasons why inflation distorts monetary calculation is because business accounting assumes a stability of the value of money, which never exists in reality.

204
00:19:57.700 --> 00:20:10.700
However, under the classical gold standard before 1914, fluctuations in the purchasing power of money were minor and could be ignored without falsifying business calculations of revenue, cost, profit and loss.

205
00:20:10.700 --> 00:20:23.700
These calculations guided entrepreneurs under the gold standard in allocating resources to their most valuable uses and permitted them to build up a mighty and complex structure of capital goods that was bequeathed to the 20th century.

206
00:20:23.700 --> 00:20:38.700
However, when government operating through a modern central bank significantly expands the money supply to pay for a war or for any other purpose, it causes a large decrease in the value of money that is reflected in an overall rise in prices.

207
00:20:38.700 --> 00:20:44.700
However, this rise in prices does not occur instantaneously or evenly.

208
00:20:44.700 --> 00:20:50.700
In fact, it involves a time-consuming process in which prices rise at different times and varying degrees.

209
00:20:50.700 --> 00:20:56.700
During this inflation adjustment process, there also occurs a distortion of relative prices,

210
00:20:56.700 --> 00:21:02.700
especially the interest rate, which is the ratio of prices between present and future goods.

211
00:21:02.700 --> 00:21:15.700
Both effects, the delayed change in the value of money and the distorting of the interest rate, serve to falsify calculations of profits and losses and conceal the process of capital consumption during its early stages.

212
00:21:15.700 --> 00:21:29.700
And let me just explain briefly why. The artificial decrease in the interest rate that occurs when the Fed purchases through open market operations, government securities, it pushes down interest rates.

213
00:21:29.700 --> 00:21:36.700
And what that does is it keeps or maintains the price of capital goods at the same old high level.

214
00:21:36.700 --> 00:21:40.700
Also it prevents stocks and bonds from falling.

215
00:21:40.700 --> 00:21:47.700
And even increases the stock market as prices go up.

216
00:21:47.700 --> 00:21:54.700
Secondly, as the money supply increases, as I said, the price of consumer goods and military goods in particular shoot up,

217
00:21:54.700 --> 00:21:56.700
because most of the new money is spent on them.

218
00:22:26.700 --> 00:22:33.700
Business people through accounting techniques have only set aside a mere fraction of what it's going to cost to replace capital.

219
00:22:33.700 --> 00:22:38.700
In this way, there's been capital consumption, which has made the economy much poorer.

220
00:22:38.700 --> 00:22:45.700
Now, it takes five or six years, or three or four years, whatever it is, to recognize that when you have monetary inflation.

221
00:22:45.700 --> 00:22:54.700
At the outset of a war that's financed simply by taxation, everyone would see the collapse in the stock market, losses, bankruptcies of businesses right away.

222
00:22:54.700 --> 00:22:58.380
away, and the war would be much shorter.

223
00:22:58.380 --> 00:23:04.900
So because of monetary inflation, war appears to cause universal prosperity.

224
00:23:04.900 --> 00:23:09.780
The crisis in capital consumption only appears much later when capital goods have to be replaced

225
00:23:09.780 --> 00:23:12.400
at much higher costs.

226
00:23:12.400 --> 00:23:18.780
What I want to convey to you now is how three major wars were financed.

227
00:23:18.780 --> 00:23:23.220
Okay, let's start with World War II.

228
00:23:23.220 --> 00:23:34.220
The current expenditure on this war varies. It was between $250 billion to $380 billion in 1940, which is a couple of trillion dollars today.

229
00:23:34.220 --> 00:23:49.220
It was an extremely expensive war. 40% was financed by taxation. The other 60% was split between non-inflationary borrowing, about 35%, and 25% was through money creation.

230
00:23:49.220 --> 00:24:01.220
What about the war in Vietnam? The total budgetary cost of the war in Vietnam, again it varies, is somewhere between 112 billion to 155 billion.

231
00:24:01.220 --> 00:24:12.220
So I took 140 billion as a nice round figure. There was a total budget deficit, so it's 140 billion in 1965.

232
00:24:12.220 --> 00:24:21.220
The total budget deficits from 1965 to 1973 were about 70 billion, about exactly half the cost of the war.

233
00:24:21.220 --> 00:24:26.220
Taxation, therefore, paid for about 50% of the Vietnam War.

234
00:24:26.220 --> 00:24:33.220
Non-inflationary borrowing paid for 21% and money creation paid for over a quarter again, 27%.

235
00:24:33.220 --> 00:24:35.220
What about the Iraqi War?

236
00:24:35.220 --> 00:24:41.220
This is an interesting war because almost none of it has been paid for through taxation.

237
00:24:41.220 --> 00:24:58.220
Zero. And let me explain why. Total budgetary cost of the war, which you can find on something called the National Priorities NPP internet site, and it shows you the dollars clicking off.

238
00:24:58.220 --> 00:25:08.220
So when I looked yesterday, it was up to $314.8 billion that the incremental cost of the Iraqi war has cost us.

239
00:25:08.220 --> 00:25:26.220
The total budget deficit from 2003 when the war started until the second, through the second quarter of 2006, okay now so remember the Iraqi war is about $314 billion, was over $1 trillion, okay, was $1,195 billion.

240
00:25:26.220 --> 00:25:36.220
But the change in debt held by foreign and international agencies and individuals was $802 billion.

241
00:25:36.220 --> 00:25:50.220
So most of the debt, probably about 75% of the debt to finance these deficits has been purchased by foreigners, which is more than twice the cost of the war.

242
00:25:50.220 --> 00:26:00.220
This is why taxes haven't gone up. Foreigners have paid for this war. But money creation has also been paid for proportion of the war.

243
00:26:00.220 --> 00:26:16.220
And I estimated money creation has paid for about 43% of the war, non-inflationary borrowing has paid for 56% of the war, taxes have paid for nothing, and of the non-inflationary borrowing, 100% has been paid, more than 100% has been paid by foreign lenders.

244
00:26:16.220 --> 00:26:20.220
So we're not seeing the cost of the war yet here in the U.S.

245
00:26:20.220 --> 00:26:30.220
in the U.S. And thus we don't have much of a widespread resistance or reaction to the war.

246
00:26:30.220 --> 00:26:33.220
Do I have a minute or two more before questions?

247
00:26:33.220 --> 00:26:41.220
I was thinking about, over the summer I've been thinking about writing a short book on war

248
00:26:41.220 --> 00:26:46.220
in which we apply praxeology, which is we apply to economics and Austrian economics,

249
00:26:46.220 --> 00:26:55.220
But applying it to war, and one thing I was thinking about was how do you choke or how do you bring a stop to war in a peaceful manner?

250
00:26:55.220 --> 00:27:02.220
Can we say anything that's economically valid, that's absolutely true? I think you really can.

251
00:27:02.220 --> 00:27:10.220
The communist revolutionary dictator Vladimir Lenin once said that all wars between nations must be turned into a class war.

252
00:27:10.220 --> 00:27:14.220
There's a lesson to be learned there by libertarians.

253
00:27:14.220 --> 00:27:19.020
As libertarians we have to say all wars must be turned into, all imperialist wars,

254
00:27:19.020 --> 00:27:23.740
because that's what we're fighting these days, must be turned into a war between the ruling elites,

255
00:27:23.740 --> 00:27:28.460
that is the tax consumers and the war makers, and the productive class who pay taxes

256
00:27:28.460 --> 00:27:33.700
and suffer the depreciation of their real wages and cash holdings by inflation.

257
00:27:33.700 --> 00:27:41.540
What are some of the ways then, so we have to strike at the means by which the war makers can wage their wars.

258
00:27:41.540 --> 00:27:42.780
And how do we do that?

259
00:27:42.780 --> 00:27:46.380
One way is a good old general strike, okay?

260
00:27:46.380 --> 00:27:49.940
Since we have withholding, there's no way to have a tax revolt.

261
00:27:49.940 --> 00:27:58.220
However, we can indirectly choke off taxes by going on strike, not going to work, okay?

262
00:27:58.220 --> 00:28:02.980
Now, this would give large businesses and corporations an incentive to be against the war,

263
00:28:02.980 --> 00:28:08.380
as they saw their profits plummeting and so on, as middle-class productive people stayed out of work, okay?

264
00:28:08.380 --> 00:28:12.300
So, it wouldn't be the state versus small individuals.

265
00:28:12.300 --> 00:28:18.900
You would now have a class of corporations in the middle, many of them with an incentive

266
00:28:18.900 --> 00:28:22.180
to put pressure on government to bring an end to the war.

267
00:28:22.180 --> 00:28:26.660
Secondly, middle class people could turn to a cash-only economy, that's easy.

268
00:28:26.660 --> 00:28:32.260
Everyone should take all their money out of their checking accounts, savings deposits, certificates of deposit.

269
00:28:32.260 --> 00:28:36.060
In that way, the banking system would grind to a halt.

270
00:28:36.060 --> 00:28:41.980
It is true that all the deposits are insured, even though only 10% of your checking deposits are held

271
00:28:41.980 --> 00:28:45.660
and 0% or half a percent of your savings deposits are held.

272
00:28:45.660 --> 00:28:48.860
It would take a while for the banks to pay all the depositors off,

273
00:28:48.860 --> 00:28:52.020
but the government could no longer use a banking system

274
00:28:52.020 --> 00:28:56.340
where it would be disrupted to finance the war.

275
00:28:56.340 --> 00:29:01.380
Also, of course, to the extent that you can, selling off of government bonds.

276
00:29:01.380 --> 00:29:04.820
Boycott the government post office and then that welfare program.

277
00:29:04.820 --> 00:29:08.780
They use only email and so on.

278
00:29:08.780 --> 00:29:20.280
And finally, setting up alternative people's tribunals of the natural elites, the productive people in society, people who have good reputations,

279
00:29:20.280 --> 00:29:34.280
people like Bill Gates and people like that, and to try, in absentia, the ruling cast members, that is, the people who are making the wars and who are committing treason to the U.S. Constitution.

280
00:29:34.280 --> 00:29:36.280
I'll end here. Thank you.