WEBVTT

NOTE A Toast to Lysander Spooner

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.000
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with Jeff Brigenbach.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:28.000
It is in January of each year when, if we are wise, we raise a toast, or otherwise appropriately celebrate, the birthday of Lysander Spooner, one of the greatest of all libertarian theoreticians.

3
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:39.000
Spooner was born on January 19th, to be precise, on a farm near the central Massachusetts town of Athol, about 70 miles west of Boston.

4
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:51.000
The year was 1808. Thomas Jefferson was just about to begin his final year in the White House, which had only opened for business, so to speak, a mere eight years before.

5
00:00:51.000 --> 00:01:21.000
The Theory of Money and Credit

6
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:44.000
In the early 1820s a very young Lysander Spooner received a proposition from his father. When Lysander turned 16 in 1824, he could leave home and try to make his own way in the world, or, if he preferred, he could remain on the farm for another nine years, until he was 25.

7
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:58.000
During this time, he would help his father, and his father, in return, would provide food, lodging, and what their official legal contract described as good educational advantages.

8
00:01:58.000 --> 00:02:10.000
Lysander chose option two, and spent another nine years on the farm after his 16th birthday. He left at last in 1833, at the age of 25.

9
00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:32.000
After a few months as a schoolteacher, a few weeks as a private tutor, and a few more weeks in the business offices of a retail store, he secured a position as a clerk in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in Worcester, Massachusetts, the biggest town in the immediate area, about 40 miles south of his birthplace.

10
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:38.240
He quickly acquired a reputation for conscientiousness, accuracy and reliability.

11
00:02:38.240 --> 00:02:45.000
He quickly came to the attention of two prominent local attorneys, John Davis, an anti-slavery

12
00:02:45.000 --> 00:02:51.040
Whig, who would later serve as governor of Massachusetts and in both houses of the U.S.

13
00:02:51.040 --> 00:02:58.280
Congress representing Massachusetts, and Charles Allen, another anti-slavery Whig, who would

14
00:02:58.280 --> 00:03:12.080
Davis and Allen encouraged young Spooner to consider taking up the study of law and pursuing

15
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:13.900
a legal career.

16
00:03:13.900 --> 00:03:17.420
They took him into their law offices as a student.

17
00:03:17.420 --> 00:03:23.040
But when he completed the standard three-year curriculum in two years, he found himself

18
00:03:23.040 --> 00:03:25.700
barred from practicing law.

19
00:03:25.700 --> 00:03:31.140
Not because he had not devoted the customary three years to his studies, but because the

20
00:03:31.140 --> 00:03:37.340
state of Massachusetts required five years of study from any would-be lawyer who was

21
00:03:37.340 --> 00:03:40.220
not a college graduate.

22
00:03:40.220 --> 00:03:44.840
Spooner protested, and Davis and Allen backed his protest.

23
00:03:44.840 --> 00:03:49.800
When their brilliant young students submitted a petition to the legislature seeking a change

24
00:03:49.800 --> 00:03:52.420
in the law, they got it read.

25
00:03:52.420 --> 00:03:58.420
Davis, by then governor of the state, and Allen, by then a state senator, also saw to

26
00:03:58.420 --> 00:04:01.140
it that the law was changed.

27
00:04:01.140 --> 00:04:08.820
By 1836, at the age of 28, Spooner could legally practice law in Massachusetts.

28
00:04:08.820 --> 00:04:13.460
He was to practice law in Massachusetts for the rest of his long life, though it never

29
00:04:13.460 --> 00:04:15.540
made him much money.

30
00:04:15.540 --> 00:04:21.740
His problem was that he kept driving clients and prospective clients away by publicizing

31
00:04:21.740 --> 00:04:28.740
and Spooner had radical opinions on just about anything you could name.

32
00:04:28.740 --> 00:04:34.640
He had come from a family of ardent abolitionists, so he was long used to the idea of holding

33
00:04:34.640 --> 00:04:38.140
views most other people didn't agree with.

34
00:04:38.140 --> 00:04:43.740
And during his years as a law student, Spooner had begun broadening his radicalism beyond

35
00:04:43.740 --> 00:04:46.300
just the slavery issue.

36
00:04:46.300 --> 00:04:53.580
He devoted much of his spare time in the early to mid-1830s, for example, to reading theology,

37
00:04:53.580 --> 00:04:58.060
and he soon began publishing his views on what he was reading.

38
00:04:58.060 --> 00:05:05.100
In 1834, he published a pamphlet entitled The Deist's Immortality and an essay on man's

39
00:05:05.100 --> 00:05:08.260
accountability for his belief.

40
00:05:08.260 --> 00:05:15.020
In 1836, just as his legal right to practice law in Massachusetts was receiving official

41
00:05:15.020 --> 00:05:22.380
Approval, he published another pamphlet entitled, The Deists' Reply to the Alleged Supernatural

42
00:05:22.380 --> 00:05:25.420
Evidences of Christianity.

43
00:05:25.420 --> 00:05:31.060
Now don't get me wrong here, I'm not saying that Spooner scared away business merely by

44
00:05:31.060 --> 00:05:33.940
coming out as a free thinker.

45
00:05:33.940 --> 00:05:39.980
Freethought was a popular movement in 19th century America, it was a broad coalition.

46
00:05:39.980 --> 00:05:45.420
Of course, it included atheists and agnostics, but their numbers were small.

47
00:05:45.420 --> 00:05:50.940
It also included the more numerous deists, people who believed in a god who had made

48
00:05:50.940 --> 00:05:57.820
the universe and then, in effect, walked away, a god who neither listened to nor acted upon

49
00:05:57.820 --> 00:06:03.820
the prayers of individual humans, a god who refrained from interfering in the world he

50
00:06:03.820 --> 00:06:19.620
The Free Thought Movement included many religious leaders and thinkers as well, mostly Unitarians

51
00:06:19.620 --> 00:06:25.000
and Transcendentalists with here and there a few Quakers thrown in, religious thinkers

52
00:06:25.000 --> 00:06:32.300
who were critical of the idea of turning to religious dogma as a source of truth or authority,

53
00:06:32.300 --> 00:06:37.900
Religious thinkers who rejected biblical miracles and the divinity of Jesus.

54
00:06:37.900 --> 00:06:43.420
The Free Thought Movement also included thousands of people whose main interest was religious

55
00:06:43.420 --> 00:06:49.820
freedom, an aggressive activist commitment to separation of church and state.

56
00:06:49.820 --> 00:06:55.420
And free thinkers generally insisted that human progress depended on the exercise of

57
00:06:55.420 --> 00:07:01.620
to each individual's reason with regard to all knowledge, even knowledge of so-called

58
00:07:01.620 --> 00:07:03.680
sacred things.

59
00:07:03.680 --> 00:07:08.300
There were lots of free thinkers in the America of 1836.

60
00:07:08.300 --> 00:07:13.740
But as Spooner's biographer Charles Shively puts it, other critics of traditional dogma

61
00:07:13.740 --> 00:07:18.900
were soft and gentlemanly, solicitous of their opposition.

62
00:07:18.900 --> 00:07:24.260
Spooner was uncompromising and harsh with clergymen and believers.

63
00:07:24.260 --> 00:07:30.120
In Spooner's pamphlets, as Shively describes them, Christ is dismissed as a charlatan,

64
00:07:30.120 --> 00:07:36.480
and the Bible as an unreliable set of old wives' tales, if not outright lies.

65
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:42.400
Clergymen knew all this, Spooner argued, but they used their offices for prestige and an

66
00:07:42.400 --> 00:07:44.400
easy living.

67
00:07:44.400 --> 00:07:49.860
His pamphlets were intended, according to Spooner himself, to awaken opposition to the

68
00:07:49.860 --> 00:07:55.900
the clergy and Christianity, because they delude and enslave the imaginations of the

69
00:07:55.900 --> 00:08:03.840
young and make men dupes, fools, slaves, cowards, bigots and fanatics.

70
00:08:03.840 --> 00:08:09.000
Potential clients tended to shy away from engaging such an intransigent firebrand to

71
00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:11.380
represent them in court.

72
00:08:11.380 --> 00:08:17.500
Spooner, on the other hand, had discovered his true calling, the thing he most enjoyed

73
00:08:17.500 --> 00:08:24.500
The Theory of Money and Credit

74
00:08:47.500 --> 00:08:54.900
In 1837, when he was 29 years old, he bought land in Ohio, only to lose everything when

75
00:08:54.900 --> 00:09:02.460
land prices collapsed in the once-famous Panic of 1837, which was followed by a five-year

76
00:09:02.460 --> 00:09:08.100
depression, including bank failures and abnormally high rates of unemployment.

77
00:09:08.100 --> 00:09:15.440
Then, some six years later, now in his mid-30s, Spooner once again put all his savings behind

78
00:09:15.440 --> 00:09:17.300
a business venture.

79
00:09:17.300 --> 00:09:22.260
This time it was a private postal service that carried letters between addresses in

80
00:09:22.260 --> 00:09:24.920
Boston and Baltimore.

81
00:09:24.920 --> 00:09:31.280
This venture prospered quickly and expanded its services to include New York and Philadelphia,

82
00:09:31.280 --> 00:09:33.860
but its success was short-lived.

83
00:09:33.860 --> 00:09:39.940
It was forced out of business, scarcely six months after opening its doors, by the U.S.

84
00:09:39.940 --> 00:09:45.780
government, intent upon enforcing the Private Express statutes, which prohibit the establishment

85
00:09:45.780 --> 00:09:49.780
of Private Firms to Deliver First Class Mail.

86
00:09:49.780 --> 00:09:55.900
Characteristically, Spooner wrote a pamphlet called The Unconstitutionality of the Laws

87
00:09:55.900 --> 00:10:01.700
of Congress Prohibiting Private Mails, in which he defended his case.

88
00:10:01.700 --> 00:10:03.300
But it was of no avail.

89
00:10:03.300 --> 00:10:07.140
Again, Spooner lost everything.

90
00:10:07.140 --> 00:10:13.660
Thereafter he lived the life of an urban recluse, reading, studying and writing, living on his

91
00:10:13.660 --> 00:10:19.860
His meager earnings, never again investing any of them in speculative business ventures.

92
00:10:19.860 --> 00:10:25.860
No sooner had his American Letter mail company been forced into bankruptcy by the U.S. government

93
00:10:25.860 --> 00:10:32.180
than Spooner sat down to work on a new book, with the provocative title, The Unconstitutionality

94
00:10:32.180 --> 00:10:35.020
of Slavery.

95
00:10:35.020 --> 00:10:41.440
Historian Tom Woods, author of the best-selling Politically Incorrect Guide to American History,

96
00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:47.780
in a 2006 lecture on American radicalism in the years before the Civil War, gives a nice

97
00:10:47.780 --> 00:10:55.520
explanation of exactly why Spooner's title, The Unconstitutionality of Slavery, was so

98
00:10:55.520 --> 00:11:00.040
provocative when it was published in 1845.

99
00:11:00.040 --> 00:11:06.000
The reader opens the book, Woods explains, expecting to find a predictable anti-slavery

100
00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:13.000
He's claiming that the Constitution not only does not sanction slavery, but is in fact an anti-slavery document.

101
00:11:13.000 --> 00:11:17.000
And at first glance that just seems absurd, even ridiculous.

102
00:11:17.000 --> 00:11:23.000
Surely there are clauses in the Constitution that sanction or at least refer to slavery.

103
00:11:23.000 --> 00:11:26.000
So what exactly can Spooner mean here?

104
00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:30.000
Well, let's first note the context of the unconstitutionality of slavery.

105
00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:32.000
What exactly can Spooner mean here?

106
00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:36.000
Well, let's first note the context of the unconstitutionality of slavery.

107
00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:41.000
Spooner is breaking here with more mainstream, you might say, abolitionists,

108
00:11:41.000 --> 00:11:46.000
like William Lloyd Garrison, a fellow, I guess, Massachusettsian.

109
00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:51.000
Garrison was probably the best known abolitionist in the United States.

110
00:11:51.000 --> 00:11:56.000
He was the editor of a paper called The Liberator that was published since 1831.

111
00:11:56.000 --> 00:12:01.600
and he also was involved in regional and national anti-slavery organizations and

112
00:12:01.600 --> 00:12:05.200
Garrison took the view that the Constitution was a pro-slavery document

113
00:12:05.200 --> 00:12:10.160
and therefore needed to be repudiated by abolitionists so Garrison took the view

114
00:12:10.160 --> 00:12:14.760
that the Constitution was a covenant with with hell basically it was a

115
00:12:14.760 --> 00:12:21.440
covenant with death that it had blood on its hands that no abolitionist could be

116
00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:37.680
Why did Spooner argue that slavery was unconstitutional? How did he justify this view? By focusing

117
00:12:37.680 --> 00:12:45.000
his attention on the exact wording of the Constitution. Here Tom Woods quotes Spooner's

118
00:12:45.000 --> 00:12:47.000
exact words.

119
00:12:47.000 --> 00:12:52.560
Everybody must admit that the Constitution itself contains no language from which alone

120
00:12:52.560 --> 00:12:57.560
any court that were either strangers to the prior existence of slavery or that did not

121
00:12:57.560 --> 00:13:02.920
assume its prior existence to be legal could legally decide that the Constitution sanctioned

122
00:13:02.920 --> 00:13:03.920
it.

123
00:13:03.920 --> 00:13:08.200
And this is the true test for determining whether the Constitution does or does not

124
00:13:08.200 --> 00:13:13.480
sanction slavery, that is, whether a court of law strangers to the prior existence of

125
00:13:13.480 --> 00:13:25.480
If slavery, or not assuming its prior existence to be legal, looking only at the naked language of the instrument, could consistently with legal rules judicially determine that it sanctions slavery.

126
00:13:25.480 --> 00:13:31.480
Every lawyer who at all deserves that name knows that the claim for slavery could stand no such test.

127
00:13:31.480 --> 00:13:36.480
The fact is palpable that the Constitution contains no such legal sanction,

128
00:13:36.480 --> 00:13:41.920
that it is only by unnecessary implication and inference, by innuendo and double entendre,

129
00:13:41.920 --> 00:13:46.480
by the aid of exterior evidence, the assumption of the prior legality of slavery,

130
00:13:46.480 --> 00:13:51.920
and the gratuitous imputation of criminal intentions that are not avowed in legal terms,

131
00:13:51.920 --> 00:13:56.400
that any sanction of slavery as a legal institution can be extorted from it.

132
00:13:56.400 --> 00:14:03.280
The unconstitutionality of slavery was widely read in abolitionist circles over the next decade.

133
00:14:03.280 --> 00:14:09.040
In the crucial presidential election year of 1860, it was reissued in a new edition.

134
00:14:10.080 --> 00:14:16.880
By 1847, only two years after its original publication, it had become sufficiently

135
00:14:16.880 --> 00:14:22.480
popular and sufficiently influential that William Lloyd Garrison's close associate,

136
00:14:22.480 --> 00:14:29.680
Wendell Phillips, devoted an entire pamphlet to attacking Spooner's arguments. Phillips wrote

137
00:14:29.680 --> 00:14:38.680
that Mr. Spooner's idea is practical no-governmentism. It leaves everyone to do what is right in his own eyes.

138
00:14:38.680 --> 00:14:50.680
Actually, there was something to this criticism. In point of fact, Spooner did not support either the U.S. Constitution or the U.S. government, or any government.

139
00:14:50.680 --> 00:14:57.680
It's not certain whether he held this position in the 1840s, but he certainly held it in the 1860s.

140
00:14:57.680 --> 00:15:07.680
In a letter to a fellow abolitionist, he argued that the Constitution could not be supported by honest men who know its true character.

141
00:15:07.680 --> 00:15:15.680
But he felt at perfect liberty to, as he put it, interpret the Constitution on those points wherein it is right,

142
00:15:15.680 --> 00:15:22.680
and then appeal to those who profess to be governed by it to act up to their own standard.

143
00:15:22.680 --> 00:15:30.680
Again, Tom Woods offered a memorable summary of Spooner's view in his lecture back in 2006.

144
00:15:30.680 --> 00:15:39.680
He wrote a lengthy book, or a study, called No Treason, the Constitution of No Authority following the war.

145
00:15:39.680 --> 00:15:46.680
And he uses the words no treason to indicate that the southern states committed no treason when they seceded.

146
00:15:46.680 --> 00:15:52.180
and Spooner went to the radical conclusion after the war,

147
00:15:52.180 --> 00:15:55.180
two or three decades after he'd written the Unconstitutionality of Slavery,

148
00:15:55.180 --> 00:16:00.180
he drew the conclusion that really no constitution can ever be legally binding

149
00:16:00.180 --> 00:16:07.180
on anyone who did not himself actually, officially and explicitly agree to it and sign it.

150
00:16:07.180 --> 00:16:13.180
And Spooner said, you know, whatever document this is, the Constitution, the fact is I didn't sign it,

151
00:16:13.180 --> 00:16:18.180
Nobody living today signed it, so how can it possibly bind me?

152
00:16:18.180 --> 00:16:24.180
There's no other aspect of life in which I'm just simply assumed to have agreed to something that I never agreed to.

153
00:16:24.180 --> 00:16:30.180
And so what Spooner concluded was that since there was no universal consent to the Constitution,

154
00:16:30.180 --> 00:16:34.180
and even if there had been, all those people who consented to it are now dead,

155
00:16:34.180 --> 00:16:39.180
none of us have consented to it, it has no authority over any of us, strictly speaking.

156
00:16:39.180 --> 00:16:47.300
Lysander Spooner died in Boston in 1887, a few months after his 79th birthday.

157
00:16:47.300 --> 00:16:51.940
He wrote about money and banking, religious topics, and much else over the course of his

158
00:16:51.940 --> 00:16:53.780
long career.

159
00:16:53.780 --> 00:16:59.260
But it is his views on politics and government that have made him immortal.

160
00:16:59.260 --> 00:17:04.300
Let me leave you with a justly famous quotation from No Treason.

161
00:17:04.300 --> 00:17:12.020
This passage was composed sometime in 1869 or 1870, and it conveys very well, I think,

162
00:17:12.020 --> 00:17:18.640
the exhilarating directness and plain-spokenness of Smooner's style, as well as the purity

163
00:17:18.640 --> 00:17:21.740
of his libertarian message.

164
00:17:21.740 --> 00:17:28.520
It is true that the theory of our Constitution is that all taxes are paid voluntarily, that

165
00:17:28.520 --> 00:17:34.120
that our government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily entered into by the people

166
00:17:34.120 --> 00:17:41.320
with each other, that each man makes a free and purely voluntary contract with all others

167
00:17:41.320 --> 00:17:47.520
who are parties to the Constitution, to pay so much money for so much protection, the

168
00:17:47.520 --> 00:17:54.080
same as he does with any other insurance company, and that he is just as free not to be protected

169
00:17:54.080 --> 00:18:00.440
and not to pay tax as he is to pay a tax and be protected.

170
00:18:00.440 --> 00:18:05.620
But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact.

171
00:18:05.620 --> 00:18:12.560
The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man, your money or your life.

172
00:18:12.560 --> 00:18:18.440
And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat.

173
00:18:18.440 --> 00:18:24.240
The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from

174
00:18:24.240 --> 00:18:30.120
the roadside, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets.

175
00:18:30.120 --> 00:18:35.640
But the robbery is nonetheless a robbery on that account, and it is far more dastardly

176
00:18:35.640 --> 00:18:37.600
and shameful.

177
00:18:37.600 --> 00:18:44.640
The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger and crime of his own

178
00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:45.640
act.

179
00:18:45.640 --> 00:18:51.080
He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to

180
00:18:51.080 --> 00:18:53.460
use it for your own benefit.

181
00:18:53.460 --> 00:18:57.080
He does not pretend to be anything but a robber.

182
00:18:57.080 --> 00:19:03.160
He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a protector, and that he takes

183
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:10.360
men's money against their will merely to enable him to protect those infatuated travelers

184
00:19:10.360 --> 00:19:16.600
who feel perfectly able to protect themselves or do not appreciate his peculiar system of

185
00:19:16.600 --> 00:19:18.280
protection.

186
00:19:18.280 --> 00:19:22.800
He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these.

187
00:19:22.800 --> 00:19:28.200
Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do.

188
00:19:28.200 --> 00:19:33.720
He does not persist in following you on the road against your will, assuming to be your

189
00:19:33.720 --> 00:19:38.540
rightful sovereign on account of the protection he affords you.

190
00:19:38.540 --> 00:19:44.980
He does not keep protecting you by commanding you to bow down and serve him, by requiring

191
00:19:44.980 --> 00:19:51.180
you to do this and forbidding you to do that, by robbing you of more money as often as he

192
00:19:51.180 --> 00:19:57.580
finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so, and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor

193
00:19:57.580 --> 00:20:02.980
and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy if you dispute his

194
00:20:02.980 --> 00:20:06.200
authority or resist his demands.

195
00:20:06.200 --> 00:20:11.400
He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures and insults and villainies

196
00:20:11.400 --> 00:20:12.400
as these.

197
00:20:12.400 --> 00:20:19.140
In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or

198
00:20:19.140 --> 00:20:21.520
his slave.

199
00:20:21.520 --> 00:20:22.560
This is Jeff Rigenbach.

200
00:20:36.200 --> 00:20:38.200
The Theory of Money and Credit
