WEBVTT

NOTE America Aflame

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.700
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with

2
00:00:09.700 --> 00:00:12.900
Jeff Rigenbach.

3
00:00:12.900 --> 00:00:19.540
The early publicity I saw on David Goldfield's new book, America aflame, How the Civil War

4
00:00:19.540 --> 00:00:25.220
Created a Nation, certainly made it seem like something a revisionist history buff like me

5
00:00:25.220 --> 00:00:33.300
The Review in the New York Times, for example, which ran on Sunday, March 27th, quotes Goldfield's

6
00:00:33.300 --> 00:00:40.220
description of himself as anti-war, particularly the Civil War, and goes on to say that what

7
00:00:40.220 --> 00:00:46.820
is distinctive about Goldfield's book is that he believes the 600,000 deaths and countless

8
00:00:46.820 --> 00:00:51.100
mutilations caused by the war could have been avoided.

9
00:00:51.100 --> 00:00:57.660
As Goldfield himself puts it, after the Revolutionary War, the Civil War is the defining event of

10
00:00:57.660 --> 00:01:04.140
American history, and it was not inevitable, rather it was America's greatest failure.

11
00:01:04.140 --> 00:01:11.420
Surely, Goldfield writes, the failure is evident in the deaths of over 620,000 young men, the

12
00:01:11.420 --> 00:01:16.980
misery of their families and friends left to mourn their loss, the destruction of homes

13
00:01:16.980 --> 00:01:23.580
and Personal Property, the uprooting of households and the scenes of war haunting those who managed

14
00:01:23.580 --> 00:01:29.020
to live through it, and how much wealth was seized and squandered in order to accomplish

15
00:01:29.020 --> 00:01:33.060
this orgy of destruction of lives and property.

16
00:01:33.060 --> 00:01:40.480
All told, Goldfield writes, the war's direct costs amounted to $6.7 billion.

17
00:01:40.480 --> 00:01:45.540
If upon Lincoln's inauguration, the government had purchased the freedom of four million

18
00:01:45.540 --> 00:02:10.800
Of course, this passage, admirable though it is in many respects, is predicated on the

19
00:02:10.800 --> 00:02:25.560
This has always been rather an awkward position for its many, many adherents to defend, due

20
00:02:25.560 --> 00:02:32.400
to the fact that such luminaries as the majority of the U.S. Senate in 1861, the President

21
00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:37.640
of the United States during the years of the war, and the Supreme Commander of the Union

22
00:02:37.640 --> 00:02:41.920
and Army during that time, all disagreed with it.

23
00:02:41.920 --> 00:02:49.400
The U.S. Senate declared in a resolution in support of the war adopted on July 26, 1861,

24
00:02:49.400 --> 00:02:55.860
that this war is not prosecuted upon our part in any spirit of oppression, nor for any purpose

25
00:02:55.860 --> 00:03:02.180
of conquest or subjugation, nor purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the rights

26
00:03:02.180 --> 00:03:28.120
Abraham Lincoln famously declared, a little over a year later, in August of 1862, that

27
00:03:28.120 --> 00:03:36.120
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union and is not either to save or to destroy

28
00:03:36.120 --> 00:03:42.520
slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it. And if I could save it

29
00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:49.000
by freeing all the slaves, I would do it. And if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others

30
00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:55.800
alone, I would also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I

31
00:03:55.800 --> 00:04:04.800
I believe it helps to save the Union, and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help save the Union.

32
00:04:04.800 --> 00:04:18.800
And as for Union General Ulysses S. Grant, he is widely quoted as having written in an 1862 letter to the Chicago Tribune that the sole object of this war is to restore the Union.

33
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:24.300
When I become convinced that it has any other object, or that the government designs its

34
00:04:24.300 --> 00:04:31.240
soldiers to execute the wishes of the abolitionists, I pledge you my honor as a man and a soldier,

35
00:04:31.240 --> 00:04:36.560
I would resign my commission and carry my sword to the other side.

36
00:04:36.560 --> 00:04:41.240
Nor did the other Union soldiers involved in fighting the war believe they were fighting

37
00:04:41.240 --> 00:04:43.040
to free the slaves.

38
00:04:43.040 --> 00:04:53.160
Winston University historian James M. MacPherson in his 1994 book What They Fought For, 1861-1865,

39
00:04:53.160 --> 00:04:58.540
quotes the commander of the New York chapter of the Sons of Union Veterans, who said in

40
00:04:58.540 --> 00:05:04.320
1992 that it wasn't because our fathers knew what they were fighting for that they were

41
00:05:04.320 --> 00:05:05.320
heroes.

42
00:05:05.320 --> 00:05:10.200
They didn't know what they were fighting for exactly, and they fought on anyway.

43
00:05:10.200 --> 00:05:12.400
That's what made them heroes.

44
00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:18.920
Macpherson cites two other studies of the psychology and worldview of Civil War soldiers,

45
00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:25.280
Gerald Linderman's Embattled Courage and Reed Mitchell's Civil War Soldiers, both of which

46
00:05:25.280 --> 00:05:30.840
conclude that Union troops were motivated more by the desire to prove their masculine

47
00:05:30.840 --> 00:05:35.040
courage than by the desire to advance any cause.

48
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:41.120
Macpherson himself is convinced that ideology did play an important part in the Union soldiers'

49
00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:57.120
In his motivation to fight, he argues that more than 90% of White Union soldiers could read and write, that they were regular readers of newspapers, and that many of them were even politically active, at least to the extent of voting in elections.

50
00:05:57.120 --> 00:06:10.120
Their median age at enlistment was 24, he writes, which meant that a majority of them had voted in the election of 1860, the most heated and momentous election in American history.

51
00:06:10.120 --> 00:06:14.320
It would have been more accurate, of course, if Macpherson had written that a majority

52
00:06:14.320 --> 00:06:20.400
of the Union soldiers had been old enough to vote in the 1860 election.

53
00:06:20.400 --> 00:06:26.000
And it is worth remembering that that median age of 24 is a little misleading.

54
00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:33.640
If a majority were at least 21 in 1860, a very sizable minority, probably over 40% of

55
00:06:33.640 --> 00:06:36.800
the total, were teenagers at that time.

56
00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:43.040
As James J. Martin told me back in 2003 in what was probably the last interview the great

57
00:06:43.040 --> 00:06:49.680
revisionist historian granted before his death, much of the civil war was fought by boys,

58
00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:53.400
12-year-olds, 13-year-olds, 14-year-olds.

59
00:06:53.400 --> 00:06:55.560
I found a piece by a nurse.

60
00:06:55.560 --> 00:06:59.520
She was so shaken by what had happened to her that she couldn't write about it for

61
00:06:59.520 --> 00:07:01.000
35 years.

62
00:07:01.000 --> 00:07:06.840
She was on a floor where every kid died of gangrene after having an arm or a leg lopped

63
00:07:06.840 --> 00:07:07.840
off.

64
00:07:07.840 --> 00:07:11.760
Twelve-year-olds, thirteen-year-olds, fourteen-year-olds.

65
00:07:11.760 --> 00:07:14.720
The Union Army was loaded with children.

66
00:07:14.720 --> 00:07:17.640
I'm sure the same was true in the South, too.

67
00:07:17.640 --> 00:07:22.000
Big farm kids who passed themselves off as two, three years older.

68
00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:27.760
A lot of this we know because after the war, when Congress passed the pension bill, I think

69
00:07:27.760 --> 00:07:34.360
In 1882, covering the Union veterans, they had to verify the birth dates of the surviving

70
00:07:34.360 --> 00:07:39.720
veterans to qualify them, and there was a whole operation run by a general, a Union

71
00:07:39.720 --> 00:07:44.960
general, that verified these birth dates, and as a result of that, we know a great deal

72
00:07:44.960 --> 00:07:50.400
about the extreme youth of a whole bunch of people who qualified for pensions, though

73
00:07:50.400 --> 00:07:53.640
they were just boys during their term of service.

74
00:07:53.640 --> 00:07:56.960
Gettysburg was fought mainly by boys.

75
00:07:56.960 --> 00:08:00.380
Now it's reenacted by 40-year-old drunks.

76
00:08:00.380 --> 00:08:03.240
These kids may well have been literate.

77
00:08:03.240 --> 00:08:06.560
Maybe they read newspapers when they had access to them.

78
00:08:06.560 --> 00:08:11.440
But few 13 or 14-year-olds are at all ideological.

79
00:08:11.440 --> 00:08:17.040
And for all his evident desire to establish the view that at least many Union soldiers

80
00:08:17.040 --> 00:08:22.680
were fighting consciously for a cause, Macpherson is ultimately forced to acknowledge that the

81
00:08:22.680 --> 00:08:26.300
cause in question was not abolition of slavery.

82
00:08:26.300 --> 00:08:32.460
was preservation of the Union, just as it was for the majority of U.S. senators at that time,

83
00:08:32.460 --> 00:08:39.180
for Abraham Lincoln and for Ulysses S. Grant. Nor did Confederate soldiers think of themselves

84
00:08:39.180 --> 00:08:46.380
as defending slavery. As Tom Woods puts it in his Politically Incorrect Guide to American History,

85
00:08:46.380 --> 00:08:52.940
commenting on MacPherson's longer second book on this subject, For Cause and Comrades,

86
00:08:52.940 --> 00:09:00.380
Why Men Fought in the Civil War, two-thirds of his sources said it was due to patriotism.

87
00:09:00.380 --> 00:09:04.860
Northern soldiers, by and large, said they were fighting to preserve what their ancestors

88
00:09:04.860 --> 00:09:07.700
had bequeathed to them, the Union.

89
00:09:07.700 --> 00:09:13.520
Southern soldiers also referred to their ancestors, but they typically argued that the real legacy

90
00:09:13.520 --> 00:09:19.940
of the Founding Fathers was not so much the Union as the principle of self-government.

91
00:09:19.940 --> 00:09:25.480
Very often we see southern soldiers comparing the South's struggle against the U.S. government

92
00:09:25.480 --> 00:09:28.520
to the colony's struggle against Britain.

93
00:09:28.520 --> 00:09:34.720
Both in their view were wars of secession, fought in order to preserve self-government.

94
00:09:34.720 --> 00:09:40.180
This is in essence exactly the way the great revisionist historian William Appleman Williams

95
00:09:40.180 --> 00:09:42.360
saw the U.S. Civil War.

96
00:09:42.360 --> 00:09:52.500
In his 1976 book America Confronts a Revolutionary World, 1776-1976, he writes, Put simply,

97
00:09:52.500 --> 00:09:57.700
the cause of the Civil War was the refusal of Lincoln and other northerners to honor

98
00:09:57.700 --> 00:10:04.340
the revolutionary right of self-determination, the touchstone of the American Revolution.

99
00:10:04.340 --> 00:10:11.940
And this was rank hypocrisy on Lincoln's part, as Williams saw it, for on January 12, 1848,

100
00:10:11.940 --> 00:10:14.440
The Great Emancipator had intoned,

101
00:10:14.440 --> 00:10:19.080
Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power,

102
00:10:19.080 --> 00:10:22.200
have the right to rise up and shake off

103
00:10:22.200 --> 00:10:25.080
the existing government and form a new one

104
00:10:25.080 --> 00:10:26.660
that suits them better.

105
00:10:26.660 --> 00:10:29.160
Nor is this right confined to cases

106
00:10:29.160 --> 00:10:32.240
in which the whole people of an existing government

107
00:10:32.240 --> 00:10:34.200
may choose to exercise it.

108
00:10:34.200 --> 00:10:39.200
Any portion of such people that can may revolutionize

109
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:44.200
and make their own of so much of the territory as they inhabit.

110
00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:52.200
In his politically incorrect guide to American history, Tom Woods explicitly rejects the term

111
00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:59.200
civil war for the unpleasantness that unfolded in America from 1861 to 1865

112
00:10:59.200 --> 00:11:05.200
on the very sound grounds that it was not a conflict in which two or more factions

113
00:11:05.200 --> 00:11:08.200
fought for control of a nation's government.

114
00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:13.480
Tom prefers to call the U.S. Civil War the war between the states, which is what it was

115
00:11:13.480 --> 00:11:20.360
called when I was growing up in Southeast Texas in the 1950s and 60s. He notes that other, more

116
00:11:20.360 --> 00:11:27.080
ideologically charged but nevertheless much more accurate names for the conflict include the War

117
00:11:27.080 --> 00:11:33.560
for Southern Independence and even the War of Northern Aggression. Myself, I kind of like the

118
00:11:33.560 --> 00:11:38.920
The war to ensure that Abraham Lincoln goes down in history as the president who preserved

119
00:11:38.920 --> 00:11:40.120
the Union.

120
00:11:40.120 --> 00:11:47.080
It was, after all, the almost fantastic vanity, the megalomania, if the truth be told, of

121
00:11:47.080 --> 00:11:54.920
Abraham Lincoln that supposedly justified the mass murder of more than 600,000 Americans,

122
00:11:54.920 --> 00:11:58.720
two percent of the national population.

123
00:11:58.720 --> 00:12:04.060
Man's desire to go down in history as the president who preserved the Union counted

124
00:12:04.060 --> 00:12:10.360
for far more than the petty concerns of those who lost their lives and or property during

125
00:12:10.360 --> 00:12:12.580
his years in office.

126
00:12:12.580 --> 00:12:17.440
It is useful to recall when thinking about these matters that figure I gave you just

127
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:20.800
now, 2% of the national population.

128
00:12:20.800 --> 00:12:27.780
It is as though a war were to be fought today by American soldiers against other American

129
00:12:27.780 --> 00:12:34.540
and Soldiers, in places like California and Texas and Illinois and Florida, with a death

130
00:12:34.540 --> 00:12:38.680
toll of more than 6 million.

131
00:12:38.680 --> 00:12:44.160
Yet despite the various absurdities one gets into shortly after beginning to consider the

132
00:12:44.160 --> 00:12:51.580
idea, David Goldfield does tacitly accept it, the idea that the U.S. Civil War was fought

133
00:12:51.580 --> 00:12:53.620
over slavery.

134
00:12:53.620 --> 00:12:59.060
My own guess is that this bizarre notion has taken hold in the way it has because people

135
00:12:59.060 --> 00:13:05.700
realize, however dimly, that the actual reason for the war makes its carnage and destruction

136
00:13:05.700 --> 00:13:08.100
look utterly unconscionable.

137
00:13:08.100 --> 00:13:13.380
And since it couldn't possibly be true that the sainted Abraham Lincoln and his grand

138
00:13:13.380 --> 00:13:19.640
old party had done anything unconscionable, there must really have been some high moral

139
00:13:19.640 --> 00:13:31.320
Goldfield writes on the second page of his new book that he wants to avoid gainsaying

140
00:13:31.320 --> 00:13:36.400
the individual heroism of those who fought and died in the war.

141
00:13:36.400 --> 00:13:42.920
Yet was it, in any comprehensible sense, heroic to fight and die for the aggrandizement of

142
00:13:42.920 --> 00:13:48.560
Abraham Lincoln, or to fight and die to prevent that aggrandizement?

143
00:13:48.560 --> 00:13:54.240
Perhaps also you see the problem with Goldfield's book.

144
00:13:54.240 --> 00:13:59.160
It's well written, it's readable, but it isn't revisionist enough.

145
00:13:59.160 --> 00:14:04.860
Goldfield is quite willing to ask hard, potentially embarrassing questions about certain aspects

146
00:14:04.860 --> 00:14:12.560
of the war, most notably about whether it was in any sense necessary to get rid of slavery.

147
00:14:12.560 --> 00:14:17.540
Goldfield is convinced that there may have been other means to achieve that noble end.

148
00:14:17.540 --> 00:14:22.980
After all, he points out, the United States was the only country to require a civil war

149
00:14:22.980 --> 00:14:25.420
in order to abolish slavery.

150
00:14:25.420 --> 00:14:31.740
But he never questions the myth that the war was fought over slavery in the first place.

151
00:14:31.740 --> 00:14:37.660
Nor does he question the myth that wars can boost a nation's economy as opposed to enriching

152
00:14:37.660 --> 00:14:42.340
politically connected businessmen at the expense of everyone else.

153
00:14:42.340 --> 00:14:47.700
First of all, it seems never to have occurred to Goldfield to question the closely related

154
00:14:47.700 --> 00:14:54.780
myth that any amount of government spending on anything whatever can create prosperity

155
00:14:54.780 --> 00:14:56.400
or abundance.

156
00:14:56.400 --> 00:14:59.520
In a way, I suppose this is understandable.

157
00:14:59.520 --> 00:15:05.740
Even to someone who knows nothing of economics, or who knows only the tissue of absurdities

158
00:15:05.740 --> 00:15:11.960
peddled by mainstream economists, it probably seems fairly obvious that taking money out

159
00:15:11.960 --> 00:15:18.760
of the Economy and spending it on blowing things up cannot lead to prosperity or abundance

160
00:15:18.760 --> 00:15:22.560
for anyone but a few explosives manufacturers.

161
00:15:22.560 --> 00:15:28.480
It is probably less intuitively obvious, however, especially to someone who knows little or

162
00:15:28.480 --> 00:15:35.480
nothing about economics, that government spending on things like railroads cannot create prosperity

163
00:15:35.480 --> 00:15:37.200
or abundance either.

164
00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:42.640
Thus Goldfield writes of the early years of the Lincoln administration, after the secession

165
00:15:42.640 --> 00:15:48.680
of the Confederate states, that the Republican Congress, free of the Southern Democratic

166
00:15:48.680 --> 00:15:55.280
albatross, passed an array of economic and educational legislation that helped to establish

167
00:15:55.280 --> 00:16:01.240
the federal government as an important catalyst in creating a national economy.

168
00:16:01.240 --> 00:16:07.980
He writes that the transcontinental railroad completed in 1869 was a symbol of the new

169
00:16:07.980 --> 00:16:13.100
role of government as a facilitator of the national economy.

170
00:16:13.100 --> 00:16:18.720
He writes that the federal government during the war years was an active partner with private

171
00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:23.960
enterprise in expanding the economy and generating wealth.

172
00:16:23.960 --> 00:16:29.480
He writes, on the other hand, that despite the general prosperity, it is probable that

173
00:16:29.480 --> 00:16:36.400
the condition of working class Americans was worse at the end of the war than at the beginning.

174
00:16:36.400 --> 00:16:42.880
Since most Americans at that time were working class, what exactly does the phrase general

175
00:16:42.880 --> 00:16:46.280
prosperity mean in that sentence?

176
00:16:46.280 --> 00:16:53.880
How can there be general prosperity while the economic condition of most people is declining?

177
00:16:53.880 --> 00:16:55.280
Hello?

178
00:16:55.280 --> 00:17:02.160
It is evident that Goldfield does not understand that government has no money of its own because

179
00:17:02.160 --> 00:17:09.000
it produces nothing, that all its money is stolen from those who do produce something

180
00:17:09.000 --> 00:17:14.520
and who would have spent that money on one thing or another if government had not seized

181
00:17:14.520 --> 00:17:21.920
it, so that there is therefore no net gain to the economy when government takes its stolen

182
00:17:21.920 --> 00:17:28.720
and Money and spends it on subsidies to railroads, or, these days, to automakers.

183
00:17:28.720 --> 00:17:33.760
There are many other things Goldfield seems not to understand, enough of them to justify

184
00:17:33.760 --> 00:17:39.240
saying that they are too numerous to name in what can only be a fairly brief review

185
00:17:39.240 --> 00:17:41.120
of his book.

186
00:17:41.120 --> 00:17:47.760
The book, America Aflame, How the Civil War Created a Nation, is willing to revise the

187
00:17:47.760 --> 00:18:04.620
Goldfield's unwillingness to similarly challenge almost everything else that needs to be challenged

188
00:18:04.620 --> 00:18:10.260
about that conventional wisdom makes his book, in the end, considerably less than it might

189
00:18:10.260 --> 00:18:11.400
have been.

190
00:18:11.400 --> 00:18:16.560
If you're looking for a good one-volume history of the entire Civil War, I'd advise you to

191
00:18:16.560 --> 00:18:23.780
to pass this one up. My own favorite remains, Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men, A

192
00:18:23.780 --> 00:18:29.740
History of the American Civil War, by Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, which was first published fifteen

193
00:18:29.740 --> 00:18:34.740
years ago in 1996. This is Jeff Rigenbach.

194
00:18:46.560 --> 00:18:48.560
www.fieggen.com
