WEBVTT

NOTE John T. Flynn: Liberal

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:11.000
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with Jeff Rigenbach.

2
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:24.000
John T. Flynn was born fewer than ten miles from central Washington, D.C., in a small town in Prince George's County, Maryland, late in October of 1882.

3
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:29.780
Before a decade had passed, Flynn's father, an attorney, had moved his growing family

4
00:00:29.780 --> 00:00:35.200
to New York, and it was there that the younger Flynn grew up, in a moderately prosperous

5
00:00:35.200 --> 00:00:38.220
middle-class Irish Catholic household.

6
00:00:38.220 --> 00:00:43.520
He attended parochial schools and a small, undistinguished college in New York, then

7
00:00:43.520 --> 00:00:48.520
moved back to the nation's capital at the turn of the 20th century to attend law school

8
00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:51.080
at Georgetown University.

9
00:00:51.080 --> 00:00:56.560
Flynn was a scholarship student at Georgetown and his family, as has been noted, was modestly

10
00:00:56.560 --> 00:01:02.940
well-to-do, but any student can always use a few extra bucks, and Flynn earned his own

11
00:01:02.940 --> 00:01:07.540
extra bucks as a part-time reporter for the Washington Times.

12
00:01:07.540 --> 00:01:12.080
After graduating from Georgetown, he spent a few months in his father's law office back

13
00:01:12.080 --> 00:01:18.200
in New York, but it wasn't long before he abandoned law forever in favor of journalism.

14
00:01:18.200 --> 00:01:23.640
It seems likely that he attended law school at all only as a way of displaying his filial

15
00:01:23.640 --> 00:01:29.960
piety and his wholehearted willingness to follow in his father's professional footsteps.

16
00:01:29.960 --> 00:01:34.360
Certainly his decision to become a journalist did not make him rich or produce anything

17
00:01:34.360 --> 00:01:36.200
like quick success.

18
00:01:36.200 --> 00:01:41.660
He wound up leaving the practice of law for a series of jobs, none of which lasted very

19
00:01:41.660 --> 00:01:47.240
long or paid very well on a series of New York and Los Angeles newspapers.

20
00:01:47.240 --> 00:01:53.420
Then he landed in 1916 at the age of 34 in New Haven, Connecticut, where he had secured

21
00:01:53.420 --> 00:01:56.120
a position on the New Haven Register.

22
00:01:56.120 --> 00:02:01.560
And now, at last, he began to enjoy some noticeable success in journalism.

23
00:02:01.560 --> 00:02:05.020
Within a year, Flynn was city editor of the Register.

24
00:02:05.020 --> 00:02:09.400
Within three years, he had moved on to the New York Evening Globe, and within another

25
00:02:09.400 --> 00:02:16.720
three years, by late 1922, not long after his 40th birthday, John T. Flynn had become

26
00:02:16.720 --> 00:02:33.720
A year later, when he left the Evening Globe, he found that he had little trouble moving smoothly into a new career as a freelance writer for magazines, mostly Collier's, Harper's, The Forum, and The New Republic.

27
00:02:33.720 --> 00:02:39.440
By 1931, at the age of nearly 50, he saw his first book appear in print.

28
00:02:39.440 --> 00:02:44.040
It was the first of nearly 20 books Flynn would write, despite the fact that he had

29
00:02:44.040 --> 00:02:47.740
got off to rather a late start as an author of books.

30
00:02:47.740 --> 00:02:54.040
In his magazine pieces and his books, he wrote mostly about economics and economic policy,

31
00:02:54.040 --> 00:02:59.000
the subjects he had begun to specialize in during his years on the Evening Globe.

32
00:02:59.000 --> 00:03:02.920
It wasn't as though Flynn knew anything much about economics.

33
00:03:02.920 --> 00:03:08.560
Ralph Reiko, in his Introduction to the 50th Anniversary Edition of Flynn's best-known

34
00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:13.800
book, writes that Flynn's thinking on economics was not notably sophisticated.

35
00:03:13.800 --> 00:03:19.320
He fully appreciated the productive dynamism of the private property market economy, but

36
00:03:19.320 --> 00:03:25.480
in his progressive phase he held that government had a crucial role to play in reining in the

37
00:03:25.480 --> 00:03:32.440
excesses of capitalism by thwarting monopolies, protecting small investors, and undertaking

38
00:03:32.440 --> 00:03:44.440
and Moderate Social Reform. Yet he was never a socialist. To his mind, the hopes for a free and prosperous society lay in a truly competitive private enterprise system.

39
00:03:44.440 --> 00:04:00.440
Reiko assures us that Flynn opposed the New Deal practically from the start. But one wonders. Flynn's biographer John E. Moser reports that in 1932, at the time Franklin Roosevelt was running for his first term in the White House,

40
00:04:00.440 --> 00:04:06.960
House, Flynn publicly dismissed what he called the Doctrine of Laissez-Faire as the Gospel

41
00:04:06.960 --> 00:04:08.860
of the Reactionary.

42
00:04:08.860 --> 00:04:15.640
In 1934, Flynn called for a national minimum wage law, a vast program of public spending

43
00:04:15.640 --> 00:04:21.560
mainly on construction projects to relieve unemployment, and a government-run system

44
00:04:21.560 --> 00:04:24.780
of unemployment and old age insurance.

45
00:04:24.780 --> 00:04:31.340
In 1936, Flynn called for three constitutional amendments, one that would give to the government

46
00:04:31.340 --> 00:04:37.340
the police power over all economic matters of national importance, and two others that

47
00:04:37.340 --> 00:04:44.180
would free Congress and state legislatures from the inhibitions of the due process clause.

48
00:04:44.180 --> 00:04:47.540
Sounds a lot like the New Deal to me.

49
00:04:47.540 --> 00:04:53.820
Flynn thought, according to Moser, that instead of opening up the economy to competitive forces,

50
00:04:53.820 --> 00:05:01.260
Roosevelt seemed bent on cartelizing it, principally through the National Recovery Act, NRA, which

51
00:05:01.260 --> 00:05:05.620
Flynn regarded as a copy of Mussolini's corporate state.

52
00:05:05.620 --> 00:05:11.540
And what exactly was it that Flynn had expected as the outcome of constitutional amendments

53
00:05:11.540 --> 00:05:16.740
to give the federal government the police power over all economic matters of national

54
00:05:16.740 --> 00:05:18.020
importance?

55
00:05:18.020 --> 00:05:21.180
One shakes one's head in wonderment.

56
00:05:21.180 --> 00:05:26.700
What John T. Flynn was, of course, was a liberal, specifically what for most of a hundred

57
00:05:26.700 --> 00:05:32.940
years now has been known as a classical liberal, that is, an advocate of a political position

58
00:05:32.940 --> 00:05:40.020
that is basically anti-war, pro-market, in favor of free international trade and in favor

59
00:05:40.020 --> 00:05:46.380
of freedom for every individual, virtually what you'd call a libertarian position, except

60
00:05:46.380 --> 00:06:14.820
To get a sense of how utterly ridiculous this idea seems to a hardcore libertarian, imagine

61
00:06:14.820 --> 00:06:18.820
and attempting to reform the Mafia in this way.

62
00:06:18.820 --> 00:06:23.620
It is important to bear in mind here that these classical liberals of whom I speak are

63
00:06:23.620 --> 00:06:29.760
not all a bunch of bewigged denizens of the 18th century who stopped short of anarchism

64
00:06:29.760 --> 00:06:34.040
in their political thinking only because it hadn't yet been invented.

65
00:06:34.040 --> 00:06:39.840
On the contrary, there were still liberals long after anarchism was invented.

66
00:06:39.840 --> 00:06:44.500
If you figure, for the sake of intellectual convenience, that anarchism was invented by

67
00:06:44.500 --> 00:06:51.260
by William Godwin in the 1790s, then you can say that a full hundred years after anarchism

68
00:06:51.260 --> 00:06:56.500
had been invented, during the second Grover Cleveland administration, that's between

69
00:06:56.500 --> 00:07:03.020
1893 and 1897, there were still plenty of liberals in the United States.

70
00:07:03.020 --> 00:07:08.940
They were even sufficiently numerous to exercise arguably a considerable influence in our domestic

71
00:07:08.940 --> 00:07:11.020
politics at that time.

72
00:07:11.020 --> 00:07:14.480
And these liberals hadn't the excuse of ignorance, either.

73
00:07:14.480 --> 00:07:17.080
They knew about the anarchist alternative.

74
00:07:17.080 --> 00:07:22.240
The largest circulation anarchist periodical in the world was edited and published right

75
00:07:22.240 --> 00:07:27.740
here in the United States, in New York, by Benjamin R. Tucker, who rightly referred to

76
00:07:27.740 --> 00:07:33.240
anarchists of his stripe as un-terrified Jeffersonian Democrats.

77
00:07:33.240 --> 00:07:38.580
For more than 200 years in this country, those who qualify for the description classical

78
00:07:38.580 --> 00:07:44.180
Classical Liberal have rejected anarchism not out of ignorance of its existence, but

79
00:07:44.180 --> 00:07:48.760
out of terror at what they imagine to be its practical results.

80
00:07:48.760 --> 00:07:53.580
And who is it who qualifies exactly for the description Classical Liberal?

81
00:07:53.580 --> 00:07:57.740
This is a more complicated question than it may at first seem.

82
00:07:57.740 --> 00:08:02.980
All classical liberals have always believed it was all right to coerce the other residents

83
00:08:02.980 --> 00:08:08.220
of their communities or countries for certain purposes, but they have differed widely on

84
00:08:08.220 --> 00:08:13.020
What Purposes They Considered Important Enough to Justify Such Coercion?

85
00:08:13.020 --> 00:08:18.740
To Adam Smith, it was just to coerce his neighbors to provide schooling for those whose parents

86
00:08:18.740 --> 00:08:22.460
were too poor or too improvident to buy it for them.

87
00:08:22.460 --> 00:08:27.420
To Thomas Jefferson and his colleagues among the American Founding Fathers, it was just

88
00:08:27.420 --> 00:08:32.200
to coerce one's neighbors if they were of the wrong sex or the wrong color.

89
00:08:32.200 --> 00:08:37.340
To Friedrich Hayek, it was just to coerce his neighbors to provide subsidies to museums

90
00:08:37.340 --> 00:08:40.460
and Symphony Orchestras and Ballet Companies.

91
00:08:40.460 --> 00:08:45.900
To Ludwig von Mises, it was just to coerce his neighbors to raise armies to fight against

92
00:08:45.900 --> 00:08:48.780
the Axis powers in World War II.

93
00:08:48.780 --> 00:08:54.700
It was just, he believed, even if it meant forcing young men at gunpoint to don the uniforms

94
00:08:54.700 --> 00:09:01.180
of soldiers and sailors and drop bombs on non-violent civilian populations.

95
00:09:01.180 --> 00:09:06.560
Yet liberals and liberalism have done a powerful lot of good for the goal of liberty over the

96
00:09:06.560 --> 00:09:08.480
in the last few centuries.

97
00:09:08.480 --> 00:09:14.520
As the anarchist Rudolf Rocker wrote in his magnum opus Nationalism and Culture, liberalism

98
00:09:14.520 --> 00:09:19.480
judges the social environment according as it furthers the natural development of the

99
00:09:19.480 --> 00:09:24.820
individual or is a hindrance to his personal freedom and independence.

100
00:09:24.820 --> 00:09:30.760
Its conceptions of society are those of an organic process resulting from man's natural

101
00:09:30.760 --> 00:09:36.600
Social Necessities and Leading to Free Associations, which exist as long as they fulfill their

102
00:09:36.600 --> 00:09:41.200
purpose and dissolve again when this purpose has become meaningless.

103
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:47.060
The less this natural course of things is affected by forceful interference and mechanical

104
00:09:47.060 --> 00:09:54.220
regulation from outside, the freer and more frictionless will be all social procedure,

105
00:09:54.220 --> 00:10:00.380
and the more fully can man enjoy the happiness of his personal freedom and independence.

106
00:10:00.380 --> 00:10:06.120
From this point of view, liberalism judged also the state and all forms of government.

107
00:10:06.120 --> 00:10:12.520
Its advocates believed, however, that government in certain matters cannot be entirely dispensed

108
00:10:12.520 --> 00:10:13.520
with.

109
00:10:13.520 --> 00:10:17.980
Yet they saw clearly that every form of government menaces man's freedom.

110
00:10:17.980 --> 00:10:23.320
Hence, they always endeavored to guard the individual from the encroachments of governmental

111
00:10:23.320 --> 00:10:29.280
power, and strove to confine this to the smallest possible field of activity.

112
00:10:29.280 --> 00:10:34.600
The administration of things always meant more to them than the government of men.

113
00:10:34.600 --> 00:10:40.920
Hence, the state, for them, had a right to exist only as long as its functionaries strove

114
00:10:40.920 --> 00:10:47.080
merely to protect the personal safety of its citizens against forcible attacks.

115
00:10:47.080 --> 00:10:53.160
The state constitution of liberalism was, therefore, predominantly of a negative nature.

116
00:10:53.160 --> 00:10:59.080
The focal point of all the social-political thought of its advocates was the largest possible

117
00:10:59.080 --> 00:11:06.240
Thus, Rudolf Rocker, in 1937.

118
00:11:06.240 --> 00:11:12.720
In a later work, Pioneers of American Freedom, Rocker wrote that American individualist anarchism

119
00:11:12.720 --> 00:11:18.320
of the sort exemplified by the writings of Benjamin R. Tucker was closely interwoven

120
00:11:18.320 --> 00:11:24.640
at its very root with American liberalism, and was in many respects a quite natural outgrowth

121
00:11:24.640 --> 00:11:39.900
Rocker concluded that Tucker was right in calling the anarchists simply un-terrified

122
00:11:39.900 --> 00:11:42.840
Jeffersonian Democrats.

123
00:11:42.840 --> 00:11:48.240
Since the liberals were terrified, of course, they fell far short of advocating a completely

124
00:11:48.240 --> 00:11:54.080
libertarian program, the abolition of the state, nor, as we have seen, did they really

125
00:11:54.080 --> 00:11:59.560
only limit themselves to advocacy of a state that strove merely to protect the personal

126
00:11:59.560 --> 00:12:03.280
safety of its citizens against forcible attacks.

127
00:12:03.280 --> 00:12:08.320
Prominent liberals have wanted a state that also schooled its citizens and subsidized

128
00:12:08.320 --> 00:12:14.400
their artistic creativity, conscripted them into wartime military service, and guaranteed

129
00:12:14.400 --> 00:12:18.080
the property rights of the owners of human slaves.

130
00:12:18.080 --> 00:12:25.700
Yet, as Ludwig von Mises points out in the opening paragraphs of his 1927 book, Liberalism,

131
00:12:25.700 --> 00:12:31.460
nowhere was even this half-hearted program ever completely carried out.

132
00:12:31.460 --> 00:12:36.100
Even in England, which has been called the homeland of liberalism and the model liberal

133
00:12:36.100 --> 00:12:42.360
country, the proponents of liberal policies never succeeded in winning all their demands.

134
00:12:42.360 --> 00:12:47.760
In the rest of the world, only parts of the liberal program were adopted, while others,

135
00:12:47.760 --> 00:12:53.760
were either rejected from the very first or discarded after a short time.

136
00:12:53.760 --> 00:12:59.760
Only with some exaggeration can one say that the world once lived through a liberal era.

137
00:12:59.760 --> 00:13:04.760
Liberalism was never permitted to come to full fruition.

138
00:13:04.760 --> 00:13:10.760
Nevertheless, brief and all too limited as the supremacy of liberal ideas was,

139
00:13:10.760 --> 00:13:13.760
it sufficed to change the face of the earth.

140
00:13:13.760 --> 00:13:16.760
A magnificent economic development took place.

141
00:13:16.760 --> 00:13:23.520
The release of man's productive powers multiplied the means of subsistence many times over.

142
00:13:23.520 --> 00:13:28.720
On the eve of the First World War, the world was incomparably more densely populated than

143
00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:34.780
it had ever been, and each inhabitant could live incomparably better than had been possible

144
00:13:34.780 --> 00:13:36.680
in earlier centuries.

145
00:13:36.680 --> 00:13:42.520
The prosperity that liberalism had created reduced considerably infant mortality, which

146
00:13:42.520 --> 00:13:47.780
which had been the pitiless scourge of earlier ages, and, as a result of the improvement

147
00:13:47.780 --> 00:13:52.200
in living conditions, lengthened the average span of life.

148
00:13:52.200 --> 00:13:58.000
Nor did this prosperity flow only to a select class of privileged persons.

149
00:13:58.000 --> 00:14:03.160
On the eve of the World War, the worker in the industrial nations of Europe, in the United

150
00:14:03.160 --> 00:14:09.040
States and in the overseas dominions of England, lived better and more graciously than the

151
00:14:09.040 --> 00:14:11.940
nobleman of not too long before.

152
00:14:11.940 --> 00:14:16.700
Not only could he eat and drink according to his desire, he could give his children

153
00:14:16.700 --> 00:14:18.220
a better education.

154
00:14:18.220 --> 00:14:23.580
He could, if he wished, take part in the intellectual and cultural life of his nation, and if he

155
00:14:23.580 --> 00:14:29.820
possessed enough talent and energy, he could, without difficulty, raise his social position.

156
00:14:29.820 --> 00:14:34.460
It was precisely in the countries that had gone the farthest in adopting the liberal

157
00:14:34.460 --> 00:14:40.860
program that the top of the social pyramid was composed in the main, not of those who

158
00:14:40.860 --> 00:14:46.300
who had, from their very birth, enjoyed a privileged position by virtue of the wealth

159
00:14:46.300 --> 00:14:52.100
or high rank of their parents, but of those who, under favorable conditions, had worked

160
00:14:52.100 --> 00:14:57.660
their way up from straightened circumstances by their own power.

161
00:14:57.660 --> 00:15:01.180
Thus Ludwig von Mises, in 1927.

162
00:15:01.180 --> 00:15:06.300
And Mises's point here is not only well taken, it's undeniably true.

163
00:15:06.300 --> 00:15:09.500
Liberals have done a world of good for liberty.

164
00:15:09.500 --> 00:15:14.940
So what are hardcore libertarians to do with such liberals, including Mises?

165
00:15:14.940 --> 00:15:20.500
In the 1890s, men like Benjamin R. Tucker, who was arguably the founder and leader of

166
00:15:20.500 --> 00:15:26.140
the first American libertarian movement, ignored liberals and formed their strategic alliances

167
00:15:26.140 --> 00:15:31.700
instead with other anarchists, whatever their economic doctrines might be.

168
00:15:31.700 --> 00:15:38.740
Since the early 1940s, however, when the contemporary American libertarian movement first got underway,

169
00:15:38.740 --> 00:15:41.220
have adopted a different strategy.

170
00:15:41.220 --> 00:15:46.300
We have made common cause with modern-day classical liberals, whom we have taken to

171
00:15:46.300 --> 00:15:49.340
calling limited government libertarians.

172
00:15:49.340 --> 00:15:54.420
And I'd say too many of us have written off anarchists who don't feel comfortable calling

173
00:15:54.420 --> 00:16:00.200
themselves anarcho-capitalists as our adversaries, not our allies.

174
00:16:00.200 --> 00:16:05.980
But setting aside that last point, at least for the nots, how are we to know a true classical

175
00:16:05.980 --> 00:16:08.140
liberal when we see one?

176
00:16:08.140 --> 00:16:14.360
A person who believes, as Rocker put it, that government in certain matters cannot be entirely

177
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:21.240
dispensed with, yet who sees clearly that every form of government menaces man's freedom,

178
00:16:21.240 --> 00:16:27.500
and thus always endeavours to guard the individual from the encroachments of governmental power,

179
00:16:27.500 --> 00:16:32.440
and strives to confine this to the smallest possible field of activity.

180
00:16:32.440 --> 00:16:38.040
How are we to distinguish this classical liberal when we encounter him or her, from the

181
00:16:38.040 --> 00:16:43.720
The sort of garden-variety status that hangs around National Review and the American Spectator

182
00:16:43.720 --> 00:16:50.000
and the Republican Party and wants the state to leave his guns alone, but is enthusiastic

183
00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:56.440
about seeing it look in your windows and through your keyholes so it can lock you up for reading

184
00:16:56.440 --> 00:17:01.400
the wrong things or putting the wrong substances in your own body.

185
00:17:01.400 --> 00:17:05.720
The answer is implicit, I think, in Rocker's phraseology.

186
00:17:05.720 --> 00:17:12.680
The classical liberals, Rocker says, see clearly that every form of government menaces man's

187
00:17:12.680 --> 00:17:18.520
freedom, and thus always endeavor to guard the individual from the encroachments of governmental

188
00:17:18.520 --> 00:17:24.760
power and strive to confine this to the smallest possible field of activity.

189
00:17:24.760 --> 00:17:30.640
To use terminology adapted from the world of computers, liberty is the classical liberal's

190
00:17:30.640 --> 00:17:32.540
default setting.

191
00:17:32.540 --> 00:17:39.660
Their tendency is to see the solution to any social problem as liberty, any proposed government

192
00:17:39.660 --> 00:17:47.060
solution to that problem they view with dubiety, any deviation from a policy of strict liberty

193
00:17:47.060 --> 00:17:52.460
they see as requiring an explanation, a justification, an argument.

194
00:17:52.460 --> 00:17:57.780
They may make mistakes about which arguments they succumb to, which government intrusions

195
00:17:57.780 --> 00:18:04.180
It is on individual liberty they come to accept, but their hearts are in the right place.

196
00:18:04.180 --> 00:18:08.420
It is in this sense that John T. Flynn was a classical liberal.

197
00:18:08.420 --> 00:18:14.100
He was always at his purest and best, his most liberal, on subjects like international

198
00:18:14.100 --> 00:18:15.880
trade and war.

199
00:18:15.880 --> 00:18:21.340
But even on issues like economic matters of national importance, issues on which he had

200
00:18:21.340 --> 00:18:27.740
once recommended government interference in the market, Flynn gradually became more libertarian.

201
00:18:27.740 --> 00:18:33.540
John Moser points out that the young Flynn considered philosophy empty and futile.

202
00:18:33.540 --> 00:18:44.840
More important in his judgment was social science, for experts trained in the social sciences could identify the basic facts of any troublesome social situation.

203
00:18:44.840 --> 00:18:52.340
After all, evils were as easy to identify as any scientific phenomenon, and once having identified them,

204
00:18:52.340 --> 00:19:02.340
Experts trained in the social sciences would know precisely what reforms to recommend to solve social problems in a scientific way.

205
00:19:02.340 --> 00:19:14.340
The problem with this vision of reality was pinpointed by the writer and anti-war activist Lawrence Dennis in a pair of letters written in 1952 to Harry Elmer Barnes.

206
00:19:14.340 --> 00:19:22.100
Mozer quotes Dennis as saying that the same facts can prove diametrically opposite conclusions,

207
00:19:22.100 --> 00:19:28.220
because facts by themselves, without a well-developed theory of interpretation, prove little or

208
00:19:28.220 --> 00:19:29.680
nothing.

209
00:19:29.680 --> 00:19:35.000
As Flynn grew older, he came more and more to realize that Dennis was right.

210
00:19:35.000 --> 00:19:38.940
The path to utopia was by no means so simple.

211
00:19:38.940 --> 00:19:43.780
Collecting the facts scientifically was not sufficient to guarantee the good judgment

212
00:19:43.780 --> 00:19:46.020
of the Experts Who Collected Them.

213
00:19:46.020 --> 00:19:53.060
Moreover, there was the problem that intellectuals, whom by this time, 1954, he had taken to calling

214
00:19:53.060 --> 00:19:57.380
eggheads, were irresistibly drawn to power.

215
00:19:57.380 --> 00:20:02.660
Over time, therefore, his thinking evolved in a steadily more liberal, steadily more

216
00:20:02.660 --> 00:20:05.860
individualist, direction.

217
00:20:05.860 --> 00:20:11.140
Over time, also, Flynn steadily became better and better known.

218
00:20:11.140 --> 00:20:17.080
Moser acknowledges that the name of John T. Flynn might be unfamiliar today, but he notes

219
00:20:17.080 --> 00:20:22.380
that Flynn's name would have been readily recognizable to any American who followed public

220
00:20:22.380 --> 00:20:27.040
affairs from the late 1920s through the 1950s.

221
00:20:27.040 --> 00:20:33.160
As a newspaper columnist, freelance magazine writer, best-selling author, and widely recognized

222
00:20:33.160 --> 00:20:40.580
expert on economics, finance, politics, and foreign affairs, his words were read by millions.

223
00:20:40.580 --> 00:20:45.760
Through the 30s and into the 40s, Flynn wrote a weekly column called Other People's Money

224
00:20:45.760 --> 00:20:47.460
in the New Republic.

225
00:20:47.460 --> 00:20:53.140
He also wrote, for much of his career, a daily newspaper column, one that eventually appeared

226
00:20:53.140 --> 00:20:56.540
in all the papers of the Scripps-Howard chain.

227
00:20:56.540 --> 00:21:03.180
On top of that, on and off during the 1930s and early 1940s, and consistently in the late

228
00:21:03.180 --> 00:21:08.540
In the 1940s and 1950s, he had a weekly radio program.

229
00:21:08.540 --> 00:21:14.260
And that weekly 15-minute program, behind the headlines, was a big success.

230
00:21:14.260 --> 00:21:19.380
In the end, it brought Flynn's words to a much larger audience than ever before.

231
00:21:19.380 --> 00:21:26.140
By the end of 1949, Moser tells us, the program was being carried on 56 stations, including

232
00:21:26.140 --> 00:21:29.640
all 45 affiliates of the mutual network.

233
00:21:29.640 --> 00:21:37.680
By the autumn of 1952, Flynn was being heard on 362 stations, and he gleefully reported

234
00:21:37.680 --> 00:21:44.640
that it took a corps of clerks just to go through his fan mail, 100 to 500 pieces of

235
00:21:44.640 --> 00:21:47.800
which arrived each day.

236
00:21:47.800 --> 00:21:52.840
Flynn retired from public life in 1960 at the age of 77.

237
00:21:52.840 --> 00:21:58.320
He died four years later, in 1964, at the age of 81.

238
00:21:58.320 --> 00:22:03.240
At the time of his death, he was thought of by most who knew of him as a member of the

239
00:22:03.240 --> 00:22:07.280
Right, what later came to be called the Old Right.

240
00:22:07.280 --> 00:22:12.660
Ralph Raco characterizes him that way in his introduction to Flynn's best-known book,

241
00:22:12.660 --> 00:22:18.240
The Roosevelt Myth, calling him the intellectual mainstay of the Old Right.

242
00:22:18.240 --> 00:22:22.440
But in fact, Flynn was never, in any sense, on the Right.

243
00:22:22.440 --> 00:22:28.080
To the end of his life, Moser writes, Flynn never referred to himself as anything but a

244
00:22:28.080 --> 00:22:34.160
The fact is that Flynn came to be thought of as a member of the right for one reason

245
00:22:34.160 --> 00:22:36.320
and one reason only.

246
00:22:36.320 --> 00:22:41.760
His opposition to the domestic and foreign policies of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

247
00:22:41.760 --> 00:22:44.920
The thinking seemed to run pretty much as follows.

248
00:22:44.920 --> 00:22:50.360
The opposition to the New Deal came from conservatives, conservative republicans, right?

249
00:22:50.360 --> 00:22:53.200
So Flynn must have been a conservative, right?

250
00:22:53.200 --> 00:22:56.160
Well, in a word, no.

251
00:22:56.160 --> 00:22:58.960
That's another podcast.

252
00:22:58.960 --> 00:22:59.960
This is Jeff Rigenbach.
