WEBVTT

NOTE Libertarian Journalism in the '60s, '70s, and '80s

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.680
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with

2
00:00:09.680 --> 00:00:13.040
Jeff Rigenbach.

3
00:00:13.040 --> 00:00:20.120
As seasoned denizens of the libertarian blogosphere know well, libertarians and libertarianism

4
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:25.160
turn up pretty frequently these days in the writings of mainstream journalists.

5
00:00:25.160 --> 00:00:28.760
Sometimes we get an entire article devoted to us.

6
00:00:28.760 --> 00:00:34.560
When we do, it's usually an attack on our ideas, most commonly an attack that makes

7
00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:40.040
clear that its author hasn't done his or her homework and doesn't know what he or

8
00:00:40.040 --> 00:00:42.240
she is talking about.

9
00:00:42.240 --> 00:00:48.440
More often we only get brief references in articles about subjects of more general interest.

10
00:00:48.440 --> 00:00:54.240
And now and then those brief references touch on aspects of the libertarian tradition.

11
00:00:54.240 --> 00:01:00.240
Here are two such cases, a pair of book reviews that ran recently in the venerable New York

12
00:01:00.240 --> 00:01:02.040
Times book review.

13
00:01:02.040 --> 00:01:08.200
The first, which appeared on April 17th, was a review of Francis Fukuyama's new book,

14
00:01:08.200 --> 00:01:10.800
The Origins of Political Order.

15
00:01:10.800 --> 00:01:17.080
At one point, in what I'm sure he thought was just an uncontroversial aside, the reviewer,

16
00:01:17.080 --> 00:01:23.400
Michael Lind, made an effort to distinguish wise and good neoconservatives like himself

17
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:35.400
from those on the right who notoriously try to explain society in terms of homo economicus, you know, libertarians like Friedrich Hayek.

18
00:01:35.400 --> 00:01:47.400
Unlike these deluded folk, Lind explained, Fukuyama says that a strong and capable state has always been a precondition for a flourishing capitalist economy.

19
00:01:47.400 --> 00:01:48.680
and Economy.

20
00:01:48.680 --> 00:01:52.680
The problem, of course, is that Hayek says the same thing.

21
00:01:52.680 --> 00:01:58.320
He wants to limit that strong and capable state with regard to its permissible range

22
00:01:58.320 --> 00:02:05.120
of action in ways that Lind and Fukuyama probably wouldn't like, but that's another matter.

23
00:02:05.120 --> 00:02:11.040
And the other problem is that Hayek often criticized the notion of homo economicus and

24
00:02:11.040 --> 00:02:17.000
by no means based his own understanding of the workings of society upon it.

25
00:02:17.000 --> 00:02:21.840
One wonders if Lind has ever actually read any Hayek.

26
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:27.600
It is not uncommon, of course, to see mainstream journalists accused of not bothering to read

27
00:02:27.600 --> 00:02:30.800
Hayek before they sit down to write about him.

28
00:02:30.800 --> 00:02:36.640
Consider, for example, what happened when, three weeks after the Lind review was published,

29
00:02:36.640 --> 00:02:41.880
the New York Times Book Review ran another piece that contained a passing reference to

30
00:02:41.880 --> 00:02:43.560
libertarianism.

31
00:02:43.560 --> 00:02:49.580
This piece was a review of the new definitive edition of the Constitution of Liberty, volume

32
00:02:49.580 --> 00:02:56.200
17 in the collected works of F. A. Hayek, edited by Ronald Hamowy and published by the

33
00:02:56.200 --> 00:02:58.680
University of Chicago Press.

34
00:02:58.680 --> 00:03:03.980
The review was written by none other than Francis Fukuyama himself, and it provoked

35
00:03:03.980 --> 00:03:09.520
comment in the libertarian blogosphere from none other than our own Jeffrey Tucker, who

36
00:03:09.520 --> 00:03:15.180
who wrote that Fukuyama didn't give the reader much evidence that he actually read the book.

37
00:03:15.180 --> 00:03:20.240
For one thing, he critiques Hayek as if Hayek was a consistent Rothbardian.

38
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:26.640
Moreover, the whole burden of Hayek's book is to address the precise point that Fukuyama

39
00:03:26.640 --> 00:03:33.040
accuses him of neglecting, how we can know that the state will fail at planning.

40
00:03:33.040 --> 00:03:36.720
Well, yes, yes, and yes.

41
00:03:36.720 --> 00:03:41.360
On the other hand, it is rather a coup for our team, is it not?

42
00:03:41.360 --> 00:03:47.720
When a mainstream intellectual acknowledges, as Fukuyama did in his review, the extraordinary

43
00:03:47.720 --> 00:03:54.240
breadth and depth of Hayek's erudition, and his ability to wander far beyond economics

44
00:03:54.240 --> 00:03:58.860
into history, philosophy, biology and other fields.

45
00:03:58.860 --> 00:04:02.200
Those are Fukuyama's exact words, I'm quoting.

46
00:04:02.200 --> 00:04:07.960
Also, it is a good thing, is it not, when a writer of Fukuyama's stature acknowledges

47
00:04:07.960 --> 00:04:14.560
that, again quoting, unlike Glenn Beck, Hayek was a very serious thinker, and it would be

48
00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:21.000
too bad if the current association between the two led us to dismiss his thought.

49
00:04:21.000 --> 00:04:26.840
Most important of all, Fukuyama's review makes specific mention of the editor of this

50
00:04:26.840 --> 00:04:29.160
new edition of Hayek's book.

51
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:34.160
I mentioned this editor's name about a minute ago, Ronald Hammowy.

52
00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:35.720
How many of you noticed?

53
00:04:35.720 --> 00:04:38.600
How many of you recognized that name?

54
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:40.120
I thought so.

55
00:04:40.120 --> 00:04:45.960
Ronald Hammowy is a man whose name and accomplishments deserve to be better known and more widely

56
00:04:45.960 --> 00:04:49.600
acknowledged, especially among libertarians.

57
00:04:49.600 --> 00:04:56.080
He was born during the Great Depression years in Shanghai, China, the son of American parents.

58
00:04:56.080 --> 00:05:02.000
He grew up and got his first formal education in New York City, graduating from Stuyvesant

59
00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:07.840
High School in the early 50s, when its student body was still exclusively male.

60
00:05:07.840 --> 00:05:13.000
From Stuy he went off to Cornell, but came back soon enough and took a job in a record

61
00:05:13.000 --> 00:05:15.280
shop on Times Square.

62
00:05:15.280 --> 00:05:20.960
It was at this point, during his brief period as a college dropout, that Hamowy fell in

63
00:05:20.960 --> 00:05:26.120
with what I guess you could call the wrong crowd, though I confess I myself would be

64
00:05:26.120 --> 00:05:30.140
inclined to say that he fell in with exactly the right crowd.

65
00:05:30.140 --> 00:05:35.580
He hooked up with his old friend George Reisman, whom he had known since junior high school,

66
00:05:35.580 --> 00:05:39.120
and Reisman introduced him to two new friends.

67
00:05:39.120 --> 00:05:44.360
One was an undergraduate at City College of New York, a native New Yorker named Ralph

68
00:05:44.360 --> 00:05:51.880
The other was another native New Yorker, a slightly older man, maybe 30 or so, who had

69
00:05:51.880 --> 00:05:56.780
a Ph.D. in economics from Columbia but no teaching position.

70
00:05:56.780 --> 00:05:59.860
His name was Murray Rothbard.

71
00:05:59.860 --> 00:06:05.320
Rothbard was only about a decade older than Hamowy, but Hamowy was awed by Rothbard's

72
00:06:05.320 --> 00:06:06.560
erudition.

73
00:06:06.560 --> 00:06:12.680
It soon became evident, he recalled many years later, how truly amazing was the depth and

74
00:06:12.680 --> 00:06:15.000
and breadth of Murray's knowledge.

75
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:20.080
He appeared to have read everything and could cite the relevant bibliography on almost any

76
00:06:20.080 --> 00:06:22.320
topic that came up.

77
00:06:22.320 --> 00:06:28.360
At another point in the same memoir, delivered originally as a talk nearly a decade ago,

78
00:06:28.360 --> 00:06:33.160
Hamowy recalls thinking that Rothbard seemed to have totally mastered the literature in

79
00:06:33.160 --> 00:06:37.040
those fields in which he had an interest.

80
00:06:37.040 --> 00:06:43.520
not only gave the youthful Ronald Hamowy an intellectual hero to admire and emulate, he

81
00:06:43.520 --> 00:06:48.660
also gave that same youthful Ronald Hamowy some useful employment.

82
00:06:48.660 --> 00:06:53.980
By then, after a couple of years of joining his new friends in attendance at Ludwig von

83
00:06:53.980 --> 00:06:59.920
Mises' famous weekly seminar at New York University, Hamowy had decided to return to

84
00:06:59.920 --> 00:07:04.040
his undergraduate studies, this time at City College.

85
00:07:04.040 --> 00:07:10.520
During my last year as an undergraduate at City College, he wrote in 2002, I agreed to

86
00:07:10.520 --> 00:07:15.880
take on the job of typing the second volume of Man Economy and State.

87
00:07:15.880 --> 00:07:21.320
Looking back, he thinks of the assignment as having benefited him in a number of ways,

88
00:07:21.320 --> 00:07:27.980
one of which was having had the opportunity to read and discuss a first-rate text in economic

89
00:07:27.980 --> 00:07:29.060
theory.

90
00:07:29.060 --> 00:07:34.580
One of my major subjects as an undergraduate had been economics, but I confess to have

91
00:07:34.580 --> 00:07:40.260
learned more economics during the six-month period I spent typing Murray's manuscript

92
00:07:40.260 --> 00:07:44.140
than I did during my whole undergraduate career.

93
00:07:44.140 --> 00:07:49.400
Speaking as the guy who is currently reading the second volume of Man Economy and State

94
00:07:49.400 --> 00:07:55.420
into a microphone so that it can be released in an audio version, I think I know just what

95
00:07:55.420 --> 00:07:57.900
Hamowy is talking about here.

96
00:07:57.900 --> 00:08:03.720
In 1960, Ronald Hammowy began graduate study with the Committee on Social Thought at the

97
00:08:03.720 --> 00:08:05.820
University of Chicago.

98
00:08:05.820 --> 00:08:11.620
His work was supervised and directed by a visiting Austrian professor, previously with

99
00:08:11.620 --> 00:08:18.980
the London School of Economics, a man in his early sixties named Friedrich August von Hayek.

100
00:08:18.980 --> 00:08:26.240
According to Ronald Lora and William Henry Longton, it was in the fall term of 1960,

101
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:31.440
Hayek's first term as a graduate student at the University of Chicago that his slightly

102
00:08:31.440 --> 00:08:38.120
older friend Ralph Reiko, another of Hayek's graduate students, conceived the idea of starting

103
00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:45.560
an independent journal dedicated to promoting an open society and individual liberty.

104
00:08:45.560 --> 00:08:52.760
This was New Individualist Review, which published its first issue in April 1961.

105
00:08:52.760 --> 00:09:00.400
The masthead listed Ralph Reiko as editor-in-chief and Ronald Hamowy as book review editor.

106
00:09:00.400 --> 00:09:07.320
By the time of the New Magazine's fourth issue, which is dated winter 1962, Hamowy had become

107
00:09:07.320 --> 00:09:13.240
co-editor-in-chief with Reiko, a status he maintained for two years.

108
00:09:13.240 --> 00:09:19.240
Reiko went back to his original status as editor-in-chief all by himself with the issue

109
00:09:49.240 --> 00:10:19.160
One of Hamowy's most effective contributions to New Individualist Review as a writer

110
00:10:19.160 --> 00:10:26.760
was his November 1961 denunciation of the conservative movement in America and in particular

111
00:10:26.760 --> 00:10:34.440
William F. Buckley Jr. and his magazine National Review, whom he accused of promoting a belligerent

112
00:10:34.440 --> 00:10:40.640
foreign policy likely to result in war, a suppression of civil liberties at home, a

113
00:10:40.640 --> 00:10:46.720
devotion to imperialism and to a polite form of white supremacy, a tendency toward the

114
00:10:46.720 --> 00:10:52.920
The Union of Church and State, the conviction that the community is superior to the individual

115
00:10:52.920 --> 00:10:59.300
and that historic tradition is a far better guide than reason, and a rather lukewarm support

116
00:10:59.300 --> 00:11:01.180
of the free economy.

117
00:11:01.180 --> 00:11:07.740
They wish, in gist, to substitute one group of masters, themselves, for another.

118
00:11:07.740 --> 00:11:12.320
They do not desire so much to limit the state as to control it.

119
00:11:12.320 --> 00:11:19.200
One would tend to describe this devotion to a hierarchical warlike statism and this fundamental

120
00:11:19.200 --> 00:11:26.000
opposition to human reason and individual liberty as a species of corporativism suggestive

121
00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:28.300
of Mussolini or Franco.

122
00:11:28.300 --> 00:11:32.680
But let us be content with calling it old-time conservatism.

123
00:11:32.680 --> 00:11:38.560
The conservatism not of the heroic band of libertarians who founded the anti-New Deal

124
00:11:38.560 --> 00:11:58.560
Ronald Laura and William Henry Longton are convinced, and I agree with them, that New Individualist Review was one of the very finest periodicals of its type published in the 1960s.

125
00:11:58.560 --> 00:12:04.160
They write that the high intellectual quality of the articles appearing in the journal,

126
00:12:04.160 --> 00:12:10.040
together with a vigorous campaign to solicit manuscripts of equal scholarly merit, soon

127
00:12:10.040 --> 00:12:15.140
established the review as one of the best student periodicals in the country.

128
00:12:15.140 --> 00:12:20.740
Over the course of the 17-issue life of the review, some of the most respected scholars

129
00:12:20.740 --> 00:12:27.020
in the country appeared in its pages, including three University of Chicago economists who

130
00:12:27.020 --> 00:12:30.020
who were later to become Nobel laureates.

131
00:12:30.020 --> 00:12:35.260
Although its subscription list never numbered more than 800, it included the editors of

132
00:12:35.260 --> 00:12:41.640
several prestigious magazines and nationally circulated newspapers, dozens of university

133
00:12:41.640 --> 00:12:47.380
and college libraries, and several hundred prominent academics throughout the United

134
00:12:47.380 --> 00:12:49.900
States and Western Europe.

135
00:12:49.900 --> 00:12:56.300
Laura and Longton did an analysis of the first 15 issues of the review and found that of

136
00:12:56.300 --> 00:13:03.860
Of the 98 articles that appeared, 52 were authored by graduate students and younger academics,

137
00:13:03.860 --> 00:13:09.780
while 46 were the work of established scholars, many of international repute.

138
00:13:09.780 --> 00:13:15.540
Nor was the journal confined to students and faculty at the University of Chicago.

139
00:13:15.540 --> 00:13:22.940
No fewer than 58 essays and reviews were contributed by scholars outside the university, among

140
00:13:22.940 --> 00:13:28.660
Among the most noteworthy being Ludwig von Mises' review of Murray Rothbard's two-volume

141
00:13:28.660 --> 00:13:35.460
treatise on economics, Man, Economy and State, G. Warren Nutter's analysis of the nature

142
00:13:35.460 --> 00:13:42.320
of Soviet planning, later reprinted in Barron's, and Murray Rothbard's essay that traced many

143
00:13:42.320 --> 00:13:48.460
of the policies subsequently associated with the New Deal to the programs initiated under

144
00:13:48.460 --> 00:13:51.020
Herbert Hoover's presidency.

145
00:13:51.020 --> 00:13:58.980
Milton Friedman writing in 1981, some 13 years after the review had ceased publication, noted

146
00:13:58.980 --> 00:14:04.660
that of the articles that appeared in it, most remained timely and relevant.

147
00:14:04.660 --> 00:14:11.700
More important perhaps, this student venture, despite its narrow base and its limited resources,

148
00:14:11.700 --> 00:14:17.500
set an intellectual standard that has not yet, I believe, been matched by any of the

149
00:14:17.500 --> 00:14:22.500
and the more recent publications in the same philosophical tradition.

150
00:14:22.500 --> 00:14:28.500
Ronald Hamowy and Ralph Reiko were awarded their PhDs during the second half of the 60s

151
00:14:28.500 --> 00:14:36.500
and left libertarian journalism behind for the greener pastors presumably enjoyed by professors of history.

152
00:14:36.500 --> 00:14:41.500
But the lure of libertarian journalism didn't completely fade away for either of them.

153
00:14:41.500 --> 00:14:53.500
And so it was that they worked together again on another libertarian magazine almost 10 years after their first one, New Individualist Review, had closed up shop.

154
00:14:53.500 --> 00:15:00.500
Inquiry was a fortnightly like National Review, except that it was not conservative in its sympathies.

155
00:15:00.500 --> 00:15:10.500
It described its politics as Jeffersonian liberal and its regular contributors included libertarians like Murray Rothbard, Carl Hess and Thomas Szasz.

156
00:15:10.500 --> 00:15:30.500
The magazine was edited by libertarians. Williamson Bill Evers, perhaps the most prominent of the various young Rothbardians then rising through the libertarian movement, was the original editor-in-chief.

157
00:15:30.500 --> 00:15:39.700
Ralph Reiko took a leave of absence from his academic job to come out to San Francisco and edit Inquiry's extensive book review section.

158
00:15:39.700 --> 00:15:54.100
He came in as senior editor in the very first issue, in November of 1977, and he remained senior editor, book review editor, until the magazine ceased publication in the summer of 1984.

159
00:15:54.100 --> 00:16:00.100
Also, for one year, 1980, out of the nearly seven years Inquiry existed,

160
00:16:00.100 --> 00:16:06.100
Raco served as the magazine's publisher, in addition to taking care of the back of the book,

161
00:16:06.100 --> 00:16:09.100
as each issue's book review section was known.

162
00:16:09.100 --> 00:16:16.100
Meanwhile, Ronald Hammowy came on board in June 1979 as a consulting editor.

163
00:16:16.100 --> 00:16:21.100
A year later, in June 1980, he became editor in chief of the magazine,

164
00:16:21.100 --> 00:16:46.540
Inquiry was published by a brand new libertarian think tank called the Cato Institute, in a

165
00:16:46.540 --> 00:16:57.540
and a frank attempt to reach out to non-authoritarian liberals and leftists with a libertarian message packaged in a style they could understand and accept.

166
00:16:57.540 --> 00:17:07.540
It was, I think, the best and most professional libertarian magazine that had been published by anybody in this country in at least a quarter century.

167
00:17:07.540 --> 00:17:13.540
And much of what was best about it was the work of Ronald Hamowy and Ralph Reiko.

168
00:17:13.540 --> 00:17:22.940
Hamowy and Reiko went back into academia in the 80s, where they devoted themselves to advancing the libertarian cause through teaching and scholarship.

169
00:17:22.940 --> 00:17:32.540
It was Hamowy's service as the editor of the new definitive edition of Hayek's Constitution of Liberty that touched off these ruminations in the first place.

170
00:17:32.540 --> 00:17:40.240
His earlier anthology of articles on drug prohibition was commissioned and published by the Pacific Research Institute,

171
00:17:40.240 --> 00:17:53.940
Back in the days when, under its founding president, David J. Thoreau, it eschewed neoconservatism and instead hewed a consistently libertarian line to the truth about current public issues.

172
00:17:53.940 --> 00:18:07.240
And anyone who has viewed Raco's recorded lectures on topics in intellectual and cultural history knows from direct experience what a masterful teacher can do to advance the libertarian cause.

173
00:18:07.240 --> 00:18:10.680
But these men weren't always teachers and scholars.

174
00:18:10.680 --> 00:18:14.640
Long ago, in their youth, in the pre-internet era,

175
00:18:14.640 --> 00:18:20.000
when publications printed on paper were ever so much more important than they are now,

176
00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:23.800
Ronald Hammowy and Ralph Reiko were sharply focused

177
00:18:23.800 --> 00:18:28.240
incisive libertarian journalists, and they rank among the best

178
00:18:28.240 --> 00:18:32.240
who have plied that noble trade. This is Jeff Rigenbach.

179
00:18:37.240 --> 00:18:41.240
The Theory of Money and Credit

180
00:18:41.240 --> 00:18:45.240
The Theory of Money and Credit