WEBVTT

NOTE Libertarianism and Psychology II

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:11.000
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with Jeff Rigenbach.

2
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:19.000
Three weeks ago, I made a few very brief remarks on the importance of psychology for libertarians

3
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:28.000
and sketched the lives, careers and ideas of two particular intellectuals, the libertarian psychiatrist Thomas Szasz

4
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:34.400
and the libertarian psychologist, Timothy Leary, both born in the year 1920.

5
00:00:34.400 --> 00:00:40.000
Today, I'd like to add a few comments on a couple of later libertarian psychologists,

6
00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:45.000
one born in the 1930s and another born in the 1940s.

7
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:55.400
The first of these two psychologists, Nathaniel Brandon, was born on April 9, 1930 in Brampton, Ontario, a suburb of Toronto.

8
00:00:55.400 --> 00:01:05.900
Or so you might say today, though perhaps you'd say a place that's called home by around half a million people is too big to be considered a suburb.

9
00:01:05.900 --> 00:01:11.900
But neither was it any kind of suburb back in 1930 when Nathaniel Brandon was born.

10
00:01:11.900 --> 00:01:22.900
Back then you probably had to cross at least a little bit of country if you set out to travel the 20 or 25 miles that then separated Brampton from Toronto.

11
00:01:22.900 --> 00:01:30.900
Brampton was a small town of not much more than 5,000 souls at the beginning of the first decade of the Great Depression.

12
00:01:30.900 --> 00:01:46.900
It may have been half again as large as that, maybe 7,500 residents, when Nathaniel Brandon left the Toronto area behind to begin his undergraduate studies at UCLA a few years after the end of World War II.

13
00:01:46.900 --> 00:02:02.900
In the years in between, when he was a high school student in Toronto, young Nathan Blumenthal, for so he was known at the time, had read a novel called The Fountainhead by a Russian-American novelist who signed herself Ayn Rand.

14
00:02:02.900 --> 00:02:05.900
The book had a big impact on him.

15
00:02:05.900 --> 00:02:14.900
Between the ages of 14 and 18, he wrote 40 years later during the 1980s when he was himself in his 50s,

16
00:02:14.900 --> 00:02:22.900
I read and re-read The Fountainhead almost continuously with the dedication and passion of a student of the Talmud.

17
00:02:22.900 --> 00:02:30.900
By the time he was 19, Brandon recalled in the 80s, anyone could read aloud any sentence in The Fountainhead

18
00:02:30.900 --> 00:02:36.340
and I could recite the essence of the sentence immediately preceding as well as

19
00:02:36.340 --> 00:02:41.340
the sentence immediately following. I had absorbed that book more completely than

20
00:02:41.340 --> 00:02:46.860
anything else in my life. Little wonder then that shortly after he arrived in

21
00:02:46.860 --> 00:02:53.540
Los Angeles in the late summer of 1949, he wrote a letter to Ayn Rand asking her

22
00:02:53.540 --> 00:02:57.780
various questions about the philosophical implications of passages

23
00:02:57.780 --> 00:03:02.480
in the Fountainhead and her earlier novel, We the Living.

24
00:03:02.480 --> 00:03:09.140
Barbara Brandon, in her 1986 biography of Rand, reports that Nathan believed back then

25
00:03:09.140 --> 00:03:15.800
that he had identified philosophical inconsistencies in Rand's work and wanted to get to the bottom

26
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:17.300
of them.

27
00:03:17.300 --> 00:03:22.220
Somewhat to his amazement, Rand answered his letter, inviting him over for an evening of

28
00:03:22.220 --> 00:03:29.220
and so began one of the most famous partnerships in the history of the libertarian tradition.

29
00:03:29.220 --> 00:03:35.220
Over the next 18 years, Brandon read Atlas Shrugged in manuscript before it was published,

30
00:03:35.220 --> 00:03:42.220
developed a 20-lecture course on the basic principles of objectivism, Ayn Rand's philosophy,

31
00:03:42.220 --> 00:03:49.220
and offered that course for a decade under the auspices of the Nathaniel Brandon Institute, NBI,

32
00:03:49.220 --> 00:04:05.220
Unquestionably, the largest and most important libertarian organization of the 1960s in terms of its impact on younger libertarians of the time and its influence on the subsequent development of the libertarian movement.

33
00:04:05.220 --> 00:04:24.220
Once Brandon's relationship with Ayn Rand ended in 1968, he returned to Los Angeles where he established an extremely successful independent practice as a psychotherapist, did some lecturing and published a long series of books on topics in psychology.

34
00:04:24.220 --> 00:04:30.220
His name is known today to millions who know nothing of his youthful association with Ayn Rand.

35
00:04:30.220 --> 00:04:43.220
To these readers, Nathaniel Brandon is a psychologist, a principal figure, perhaps the principal figure in the self-esteem movement in contemporary humanistic psychology.

36
00:04:43.220 --> 00:04:56.220
Of all the judgments we pass in life, Brandon wrote nearly 15 years ago in his book, The Art of Living Consciously, none is more important than the judgment we pass on ourselves.

37
00:04:56.220 --> 00:05:07.220
Self-esteem is the disposition to experience oneself as being competent to cope with the basic challenges of life and of being worthy of happiness.

38
00:05:07.220 --> 00:05:12.220
It is confidence in the efficacy of our mind, in our ability to think.

39
00:05:12.220 --> 00:05:21.220
By extension, it is confidence in our ability to learn, make appropriate choices and decisions, and respond effectively to change.

40
00:05:21.220 --> 00:05:29.720
It is also the experience that success, achievement, fulfillment, happiness are right and natural for us.

41
00:05:29.720 --> 00:05:36.220
The survival value of such confidence is obvious, so is the danger when it is missing.

42
00:05:36.220 --> 00:05:42.720
Back in 1969, in the first of his psychological books, The Psychology of Self-Esteem,

43
00:05:42.720 --> 00:05:48.720
when he had first offered this idea as the key to any theory of human psychology

44
00:05:48.720 --> 00:06:04.720
In a study capable of withstanding close scrutiny, Brandon had noted that the establishment of Wilhelm Wundt's experimental laboratory in 1879 is often regarded as the formal beginning of scientific psychology.

45
00:06:04.720 --> 00:06:21.720
When one considers the views of man and the theories of his nature that have been put forth as knowledge in the past hundred years, it remains a moot question whether the starting date of the science of psychology lies behind us or ahead.

46
00:06:21.720 --> 00:06:28.360
The relevance of Brandon's concept of self-esteem to libertarianism seems obvious enough.

47
00:06:28.360 --> 00:06:33.820
If people lack the self-confidence he describes, they can hardly be expected to welcome the

48
00:06:33.820 --> 00:06:41.580
idea of a free society, a society in which they would be, literally, on their own, responsible

49
00:06:41.580 --> 00:06:45.680
for the consequences of their own decisions and actions.

50
00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:48.040
But there's more to it than just that.

51
00:06:48.040 --> 00:06:55.640
As far back as the late 1950s and early 1960s, Brandon was telling his students at NBI that,

52
00:06:55.640 --> 00:07:03.320
if there is one infallible test of self-contempt, it is a person's willingness to live under force,

53
00:07:03.320 --> 00:07:09.480
his willingness to accept as a moral principle that others have the right to dictate his

54
00:07:09.480 --> 00:07:16.080
thoughts and his actions, his willingness to submit his mind and his life to the arbitrary

55
00:07:16.080 --> 00:07:34.080
The man who submits to force when he has no choice is not immoral, provided he identifies his plight as evil, but the man who considers it moral, considers it right, that others should force him, deserves what he gets.

56
00:07:34.080 --> 00:07:48.080
As Brandon saw it 50 years ago, living in society can contribute to the survival of an individual, but only to the extent that the members of that society are rational and productive.

57
00:07:48.080 --> 00:07:54.080
Do you need? Is your survival enhanced by men who think? Yes.

58
00:07:54.080 --> 00:08:03.080
Do you need? Is your survival enhanced by men who refuse to think? No. They have nothing of value to offer you.

59
00:08:03.080 --> 00:08:11.080
by the same principle you have need of your survival is enhanced by men who produce men who have

60
00:08:11.080 --> 00:08:18.520
objective values to offer you in exchange for the things you have produced but you certainly do not

61
00:08:18.520 --> 00:08:25.160
need men who produce nothing you certainly do not need men who attack you and feed off you as

62
00:08:25.160 --> 00:08:32.600
parasites offering you no value in exchange for that which they take is your survival enhanced

63
00:08:32.600 --> 00:08:36.420
by Living Among Looters, Robbers, Criminals?

64
00:08:36.420 --> 00:08:37.700
Clearly not.

65
00:08:37.700 --> 00:08:40.860
You profit from dealing with producers.

66
00:08:40.860 --> 00:08:47.300
You do not profit by dealing with men who instead deal with you by physical force or

67
00:08:47.300 --> 00:08:49.180
fraud.

68
00:08:49.180 --> 00:08:56.020
Men who produce nothing, who attack you and feed off you as parasites, offering you no

69
00:08:56.020 --> 00:09:03.860
No Value in Exchange for That Which They Take, Who Deal with You by Physical Force or Fraud.

70
00:09:03.860 --> 00:09:09.620
Sure sounds like the state to me, but Brandon did not have the state in mind when he formulated

71
00:09:09.620 --> 00:09:11.060
these phrases.

72
00:09:11.060 --> 00:09:16.020
He acknowledged in the first of the three lectures in the Basic Principles of Objectivism

73
00:09:16.020 --> 00:09:22.860
course that concerned themselves with political economy, that throughout history, most governments

74
00:09:22.860 --> 00:09:28.180
Governments have acted on principles diametrically opposed to their proper function and their

75
00:09:28.180 --> 00:09:34.940
only moral justification, for instead of acting as men's defenders, governments have acted

76
00:09:34.940 --> 00:09:36.460
as men's oppressors.

77
00:09:36.460 --> 00:09:43.060
Yet, like Rand, whose ideas he was, after all, presenting, he insisted that though it

78
00:09:43.060 --> 00:09:49.260
may sound ironic when one considers the extent to which most governments in history have

79
00:09:49.260 --> 00:10:12.380
To many young libertarians of the time, this sounded not only ironic, but outright paradoxical.

80
00:10:12.380 --> 00:10:17.580
In Brandon's defense, however, it must be acknowledged that very few libertarians of

81
00:10:17.580 --> 00:10:21.320
of Our Sword in the 1960s were anarchists.

82
00:10:21.320 --> 00:10:27.100
The most popular version of libertarianism back then was a very austere version of what

83
00:10:27.100 --> 00:10:34.000
Sam Conkin later unforgettably dubbed, minarchism, and it was this version of libertarianism

84
00:10:34.000 --> 00:10:38.420
that Nathaniel Brandon presented in his NBI lectures.

85
00:10:38.420 --> 00:10:43.720
If there were unavoidable implications in certain of his statements about the willingness

86
00:10:43.720 --> 00:10:50.600
to Live Under Force, what 400 years before the French writer Etienne de la Boitie had

87
00:10:50.600 --> 00:10:54.880
called the Will to Bondage, well, so be it.

88
00:10:54.880 --> 00:11:00.440
That was for his mostly youthful students to sort out for themselves.

89
00:11:00.440 --> 00:11:05.920
After all, Nathaniel Brandon had never set out in the beginning to be any sort of political

90
00:11:05.920 --> 00:11:07.480
philosopher.

91
00:11:07.480 --> 00:11:13.640
He was interested in political philosophy and later used the word libertarian to describe

92
00:11:13.640 --> 00:11:23.120
In a general sense, he told interviewer Brian Lamb on the Booknotes program on C-SPAN in

93
00:11:23.120 --> 00:11:29.680
1989, 30 years after first delivering the lectures on political economy, from which

94
00:11:29.680 --> 00:11:32.840
I've been quoting, I'm a libertarian.

95
00:11:32.840 --> 00:11:38.740
If you mean by that an advocate of laissez-faire capitalism, I'm not an anarchist, as some

96
00:11:38.740 --> 00:11:44.020
Some libertarians are just an advocate of individual rights and a very minimalist view

97
00:11:44.020 --> 00:11:45.380
of government.

98
00:11:45.380 --> 00:11:50.980
Still, political philosophy had never been Brandon's idea of a career.

99
00:11:50.980 --> 00:11:55.120
He had decided in high school that he wanted to be a psychologist.

100
00:11:55.120 --> 00:12:01.640
He had earned a B.A. in psychology at UCLA, then had earned an M.A. in that same field

101
00:12:01.640 --> 00:12:08.100
at New York University, all in the same years when he was reading Atlas Shrugged in manuscript.

102
00:12:08.100 --> 00:12:13.460
He had begun practicing as a psychotherapist while still living in New York, lecturing

103
00:12:13.460 --> 00:12:16.800
on objectivism and running NBI.

104
00:12:16.800 --> 00:12:23.100
It had not been until the late 1960s, after what I suppose you might call his divorce

105
00:12:23.100 --> 00:12:29.460
from Ayn Rand, that he had finished up his Ph.D. and begun devoting himself full-time

106
00:12:29.460 --> 00:12:35.660
to psychology and psychotherapy, but it had been in the background the entire time.

107
00:12:35.660 --> 00:12:43.340
So if Brandon's discussion of anarchism in his NBI lectures of the 1960s seems inadequate,

108
00:12:43.340 --> 00:12:50.720
even laughably inadequate by today's standards, we should probably cut him a little slack.

109
00:12:50.720 --> 00:12:56.420
He said of anarchism back in the early 60s, for example, that, strictly speaking, it is

110
00:12:56.420 --> 00:13:01.780
not a political theory, but a rejection of political theory.

111
00:13:01.780 --> 00:13:07.400
Some claims that men need no government, no political system, and that any man should

112
00:13:07.400 --> 00:13:12.080
be free to do anything he pleases in relation to other men.

113
00:13:12.080 --> 00:13:17.860
And this is certainly not what anarchists of our sort were claiming then, or around

114
00:13:17.860 --> 00:13:23.520
a decade later, when in the form of books like Murray Rothbard's For a New Liberty

115
00:13:23.520 --> 00:13:30.800
and David Friedman's The Machinery of Freedom, it began to attain a somewhat wider circulation.

116
00:13:30.800 --> 00:13:37.640
Plenty of his younger students ended up anarchists a few years down the road in any case.

117
00:13:37.640 --> 00:13:42.840
One case in point is the libertarian social psychologist Sharon Presley.

118
00:13:42.840 --> 00:13:50.440
Born in 1943 during Nathaniel Brandon's freshman year in high school, Presley grew up all over,

119
00:13:50.440 --> 00:13:56.920
dividing her own high school years in the late 1950s and early 1960s between Central

120
00:13:56.920 --> 00:14:04.600
High in Kansas City and Belmont High, less than a mile from Los Angeles, celebrated MacArthur Park.

121
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:11.480
She graduated from Belmont in 1961 and set off to study psychology in Berkeley.

122
00:14:11.480 --> 00:14:18.280
A year later, in the summer of 1962, between her freshman and sophomore years at the University

123
00:14:18.280 --> 00:14:26.680
of California, at the age of 19, believing herself to be totally apolitical, she discovered and read

124
00:14:26.680 --> 00:14:28.680
Atlas Shrugged

125
00:14:56.680 --> 00:14:57.680
to me.

126
00:14:57.680 --> 00:15:04.000
On the whole, reading Atlas shrugged was a major, major influence on my life.

127
00:15:04.000 --> 00:15:09.880
According to Clatch, Presley began attending objectivist lectures, NBI lectures, in San

128
00:15:09.880 --> 00:15:13.760
Francisco and meeting other like-minded people.

129
00:15:13.760 --> 00:15:20.780
But it wasn't long before some of those like-minded people had led her away from objectivism completely.

130
00:15:20.780 --> 00:15:28.620
By 1967, Clatch notes, scarcely five years after her ecstatic discovery of Atlas Shrugged,

131
00:15:28.620 --> 00:15:32.060
Sharon identified as an anarchist.

132
00:15:32.060 --> 00:15:37.100
By this point, Presley was in graduate school at San Francisco State.

133
00:15:37.100 --> 00:15:43.940
Five years later, in 1972, armed with a new M.A. in psychology, she set out for the East

134
00:15:43.940 --> 00:15:49.940
Coast to find a Ph.D. program she felt was a good fit for her interests.

135
00:15:49.940 --> 00:15:55.180
After a brief time in Washington D.C., she landed in New York City, where she embarked

136
00:15:55.180 --> 00:16:01.060
on her doctoral studies under Stanley Milgram at the City University of New York, co-founded

137
00:16:01.060 --> 00:16:06.580
laissez-faire books in her spare time, and began attending the libertarian conferences

138
00:16:06.580 --> 00:16:11.660
and conventions that were beginning to be a familiar feature of the movement landscape

139
00:16:11.660 --> 00:16:13.340
in those years.

140
00:16:13.340 --> 00:16:18.860
In the nearly four decades since then, she has made impressive contributions to the libertarian

141
00:16:18.860 --> 00:16:25.140
and Tradition in three distinct ways, first as an intellectual historian specializing

142
00:16:25.140 --> 00:16:32.420
in individualist anarchism, second as an advocate and activist for libertarian feminism, and

143
00:16:32.420 --> 00:16:35.780
finally as a social psychologist.

144
00:16:35.780 --> 00:16:41.780
A good example of how Presley looks when she's wearing her intellectual historian hat is

145
00:16:41.780 --> 00:16:47.180
Exquisite Rebel, the best of the currently available scholarly books on Volterine de

146
00:16:47.180 --> 00:16:54.060
Declare, a good example of how she looks wearing her libertarian feminist hat is freely displayed

147
00:16:54.060 --> 00:16:59.940
at the website of the Association of Libertarian Feminists, and a good example of how she looks

148
00:16:59.940 --> 00:17:06.260
wearing her social psychologist hat is her recent book, published last year, Standing

149
00:17:06.260 --> 00:17:13.500
Up to Experts and Authorities, How to Avoid Being Intimidated, Manipulated and Abused.

150
00:17:13.500 --> 00:17:20.620
We live in a culture, Presley writes, that encourages deference to authority and discourages

151
00:17:20.620 --> 00:17:23.340
critical and independent thinking.

152
00:17:23.340 --> 00:17:28.500
We are motivated to be seen as competent, and we seek social approval.

153
00:17:28.500 --> 00:17:35.140
At root, these are the reasons that people are so easily intimidated by experts, so deference

154
00:17:35.140 --> 00:17:39.580
to authority, so unwilling to stand up and question.

155
00:17:39.580 --> 00:17:45.220
He cites the sociologist Robert Bierstadt, however, crediting him with a distinction

156
00:17:45.220 --> 00:17:46.980
that I think is useful.

157
00:17:46.980 --> 00:17:50.540
Experts, he says, use persuasion.

158
00:17:50.540 --> 00:17:57.140
He points out that expertise, skill and knowledge in a particular area is something we are free

159
00:17:57.140 --> 00:17:59.260
to accept or not.

160
00:17:59.260 --> 00:18:02.260
Authority, however, uses coercion.

161
00:18:02.260 --> 00:18:08.100
Authorities are those who have power over us whether we agree to it or not.

162
00:18:08.100 --> 00:18:13.260
For example, government bureaucrats or police officers.

163
00:18:13.260 --> 00:18:19.880
It seems to me that the implicit, though unstated, premise of Presley's book is the same as the

164
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:23.700
one that implicitly underlies Brandon's books.

165
00:18:23.700 --> 00:18:30.300
The premise that people who lack self-confidence, people who suffer from low self-esteem, aren't

166
00:18:30.300 --> 00:18:36.000
likely to support efforts to achieve a free society, or even to understand why a free

167
00:18:36.000 --> 00:18:42.240
Society is a desirable goal, and that the best solution to this problem of sheep-like

168
00:18:42.240 --> 00:18:48.320
people is guidance and advice designed to persuade them that they would benefit by being

169
00:18:48.320 --> 00:18:55.600
more self-assertive and engaging in more critical thinking about the claims of experts and authorities,

170
00:18:55.600 --> 00:19:01.820
and to help them gain access to other resources they can use to become less sheep-like in

171
00:19:01.820 --> 00:19:04.100
their thinking and behavior.

172
00:19:04.100 --> 00:19:09.860
These are, by the way, my own words. Neither Presley nor Brandon ever refers to anyone

173
00:19:09.860 --> 00:19:17.480
as sheep-like. Presley does, however, recommend Brandon's books. She calls him THE expert

174
00:19:17.480 --> 00:19:23.520
on the psychology of self-esteem, who not only discusses why self-esteem is crucial

175
00:19:23.520 --> 00:19:29.780
to healthy psychological functioning, but also gives practical steps on how to increase

176
00:19:29.780 --> 00:19:39.500
Pressly sniffs disdainfully at the many superficial simplistic books of rah-rah affirmations of

177
00:19:39.500 --> 00:19:41.300
dubious value.

178
00:19:41.300 --> 00:19:45.700
Nathaniel Brandon, she maintains, does not write such books.

179
00:19:45.700 --> 00:19:47.500
Neither does she.

180
00:19:47.500 --> 00:19:52.940
Standing up to experts and authorities is partly a running description of pertinent research

181
00:19:52.940 --> 00:19:59.620
on deference to authority, complete with informative notes that enable any reader to look up Pressly's

182
00:19:59.620 --> 00:20:06.380
sources independently, and partly a compendium of sensible advice, more or less in the spirit

183
00:20:06.380 --> 00:20:11.860
and tradition of the late Anne Landers, for people who are dismayed at how quickly and

184
00:20:11.860 --> 00:20:17.980
easily they lie down and serve as doormats for authority figures, and are determined

185
00:20:17.980 --> 00:20:19.620
to change.

186
00:20:19.620 --> 00:20:24.660
By the way, some listeners might be interested to learn that the quotations I read earlier

187
00:20:24.660 --> 00:20:30.540
Here from Nathaniel Brandon's lectures on Objectivism, the NBI lectures created in the

188
00:20:30.540 --> 00:20:37.920
late 1950s and early 1960s, were taken from another recently published book, The Vision

189
00:20:37.920 --> 00:20:45.220
of Ayn Rand, The Basic Principles of Objectivism, by Nathaniel Brandon, published by Cobden

190
00:20:45.220 --> 00:20:51.560
Press, one of those worthy small publishers by whom the libertarian tradition has again

191
00:20:51.560 --> 00:20:56.760
has been, and again, been well served during the past century and a quarter.

192
00:20:56.760 --> 00:21:02.300
This first-ever print edition of Brandon's NBI Lectures, one of the most influential

193
00:21:02.300 --> 00:21:08.260
works in the history of the modern libertarian movement, will be of immense value to anyone

194
00:21:08.260 --> 00:21:11.620
interested in the history of libertarianism.

195
00:21:11.620 --> 00:21:12.780
This is Jeff Rigenbach.

196
00:21:21.560 --> 00:21:26.560
The Theory of Money and Credit