WEBVTT

NOTE Robert Bidinotto's 'Hunter'

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.680
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with

2
00:00:09.680 --> 00:00:13.080
Jeff Rigenbach.

3
00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:19.160
In a recent conversation with a younger libertarian, I heard something that I found somewhat surprising

4
00:00:19.160 --> 00:00:22.600
and somewhat disturbing at the same time.

5
00:00:22.600 --> 00:00:27.480
But later, on reflection, I realized that what I had heard should not have surprised

6
00:00:27.480 --> 00:00:30.920
me, however much it may still disturb me.

7
00:00:30.920 --> 00:00:36.200
My young friend had said, and I paraphrase here, that he was surprised to learn that

8
00:00:36.200 --> 00:00:40.300
I thought of objectivists as libertarians at all.

9
00:00:40.300 --> 00:00:45.040
Based on what he had seen of the positions they took on political issues, especially

10
00:00:45.040 --> 00:00:50.380
foreign policy, he had concluded that they were just another kind of neocon.

11
00:00:50.380 --> 00:00:56.920
I refer to this younger libertarian as my young friend, but the fact is he's no kid.

12
00:00:56.920 --> 00:01:02.500
is in his early 40s, which tells you how long the situation with respect to objectivism

13
00:01:02.500 --> 00:01:08.820
that I'm going to describe and deplore over the next 20 minutes or so has been going on.

14
00:01:08.820 --> 00:01:15.240
That a man in his 40s cannot remember a time when leading objectivists didn't talk in such

15
00:01:15.240 --> 00:01:21.700
a way about questions of US foreign policy and about other questions as well as we shall

16
00:01:21.700 --> 00:01:27.240
will see that they become hard to differentiate from certain kinds of conservatives and hard

17
00:01:27.240 --> 00:01:30.460
to see as any sort of libertarian.

18
00:01:30.460 --> 00:01:35.640
But before I get farther into that depressing theme, there's a new book I'd like to commend

19
00:01:35.640 --> 00:01:37.060
to your attention.

20
00:01:37.060 --> 00:01:43.060
It's a novel entitled Hunter, a Thriller, and it's the work of the prominent objectivist

21
00:01:43.060 --> 00:01:45.860
writer Robert Bidinato.

22
00:01:45.860 --> 00:01:47.700
Now a word of caution.

23
00:01:47.700 --> 00:01:53.440
What follows is not properly a book review, because what I'm really interested in talking

24
00:01:53.440 --> 00:01:59.580
about here is not Bidinato's thriller in its capacity as a novel, an entertainment,

25
00:01:59.580 --> 00:02:05.560
a work of popular art, but rather what it can tell us in its capacity as a cultural

26
00:02:05.560 --> 00:02:07.060
artifact.

27
00:02:07.060 --> 00:02:13.660
As Ayn Rand said, the art of any given period or culture is a faithful mirror of that culture's

28
00:02:13.660 --> 00:02:15.120
philosophy.

29
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:21.980
But of course, no culture has a philosophy, really, at least if by that we mean a thought-out

30
00:02:21.980 --> 00:02:28.100
set of principles about the central questions any thoughtful person must be led to ask about

31
00:02:28.100 --> 00:02:29.880
the human condition.

32
00:02:29.880 --> 00:02:38.100
What a culture has is an implicit philosophy, what Rand liked to call a sense of life.

33
00:02:38.100 --> 00:02:45.340
Rand argued that it was the artist's sense of life, his implicit view of life, his generalized

34
00:02:45.340 --> 00:02:52.020
feeling about existence, that controls and integrates his work, directing the innumerable

35
00:02:52.020 --> 00:02:58.700
choices he has to make, from the choice of subject to the subtlest details of style.

36
00:02:58.700 --> 00:03:05.660
An artist, Rand argued, selects those aspects of existence which he regards as metaphysically

37
00:03:05.660 --> 00:03:35.660
and by isolating and stressing them by omitting the insignificant and accidental he presents his view of existence also as we have seen the artist by doing all these self-same things holds up a faithful mirror to the sense of life that dominates the culture or subculture he best fits into in the society in which he lives and it is with this in mind that I want to

38
00:03:35.660 --> 00:03:46.660
Robert Bedonato's Hunter. It is, I think, pretty faithful in the way it mirrors the sense of life of the subculture we know as the objectivist movement.

39
00:03:46.660 --> 00:04:00.660
Hunter begins with Annie Woods, a recently divorced Washington DC-based CIA agent, engrossed in the case of a fellow agent, now gone rogue, who has been selling secrets to the Russians,

40
00:04:00.660 --> 00:04:06.960
the Russians, outing U.S. undercover operatives in the process and getting them killed.

41
00:04:06.960 --> 00:04:12.760
At a friend's funeral, she meets a rising local journalist, Dylan Hunter, who specializes

42
00:04:12.760 --> 00:04:16.360
in writing investigative pieces about crime.

43
00:04:16.360 --> 00:04:21.240
Through his new friend Annie and through the widow of the mutual friend at whose funeral

44
00:04:21.240 --> 00:04:27.480
they met, Hunter learns about a crime victim support group and attends one of their meetings.

45
00:04:27.480 --> 00:04:33.800
He then interviews the various individuals in the group who have lost loved ones to criminals,

46
00:04:33.800 --> 00:04:39.760
often only to see those criminals acquitted on technicalities or released early from prison

47
00:04:39.760 --> 00:04:45.200
sentences that had never been properly proportionate to the seriousness of their crimes in the

48
00:04:45.200 --> 00:04:46.840
first place.

49
00:04:46.840 --> 00:04:52.760
Hunter begins writing a series of Sunday articles about these and similar local cases, and he

50
00:04:52.760 --> 00:04:58.220
He attracts many readers, some of whom are, shall we say, more serious about what they

51
00:04:58.220 --> 00:04:59.940
read than others.

52
00:04:59.940 --> 00:05:05.740
Some of them, or so it soon begins to appear, are what you might call deadly serious about

53
00:05:05.740 --> 00:05:07.280
what they read.

54
00:05:07.280 --> 00:05:13.740
For someone, or some group of someones, has begun systematically tracking down each of

55
00:05:13.740 --> 00:05:19.560
the leniently treated criminals profiled in Hunter's articles and killing them, leaving

56
00:05:19.560 --> 00:05:48.080
Bidinato's tale is very cleverly put together.

57
00:05:48.080 --> 00:05:53.280
It kept me reading on the edge of my seat, so to speak, for two full days last week.

58
00:05:53.280 --> 00:05:58.880
But more to my present point, what does it suggest about the current state of the objectivist

59
00:05:58.880 --> 00:06:00.040
subculture?

60
00:06:00.040 --> 00:06:03.480
What sense of life does it project?

61
00:06:03.480 --> 00:06:08.760
I'm sorry to report that it projects a sense of life dominated by the emotions of fear

62
00:06:08.760 --> 00:06:10.940
and vindictive anger.

63
00:06:10.940 --> 00:06:17.880
It projects the sense that the individual is alone and, too often, defenseless in a scary,

64
00:06:17.880 --> 00:06:23.440
dangerous world in which other people are out to get him, out to take away from him

65
00:06:23.440 --> 00:06:28.900
what is rightfully his, and to assault and torture him just for the fun of it, and to

66
00:06:28.900 --> 00:06:32.060
kill him if that turns out to be convenient.

67
00:06:32.060 --> 00:06:38.600
Some might wonder at this point just why these murderous people are so, well, murderous.

68
00:06:38.600 --> 00:06:42.620
Why they are so intent on committing crimes of this kind.

69
00:06:42.620 --> 00:06:47.980
What in the world contemporary objectivists see when they open their eyes and look around,

70
00:06:47.980 --> 00:06:50.460
it is vain to ask such questions.

71
00:06:50.460 --> 00:06:53.180
In fact, it is worse than vain.

72
00:06:53.180 --> 00:06:59.900
For any inquiry into the reasons, good, bad or idiotic, that someone might have had for

73
00:06:59.900 --> 00:07:07.540
doing what he did, implies, somehow, that there may be some excuse for what he did.

74
00:07:07.540 --> 00:07:12.180
These criminals do what they do because they are animals and dirtbags.

75
00:07:12.180 --> 00:07:13.580
It is in their nature.

76
00:07:13.580 --> 00:07:18.940
The only thing any decent individual can do is hope that these sub-human creatures are

77
00:07:18.940 --> 00:07:23.380
locked up in the darkest available hole and never let out.

78
00:07:23.380 --> 00:07:28.460
Or maybe they should just be exterminated like rodents or roaches.

79
00:07:28.460 --> 00:07:34.660
It is clear from their views on US foreign policy that most objectivists today live in

80
00:07:34.660 --> 00:07:38.940
the very same frightening world that I have just described.

81
00:07:38.940 --> 00:07:45.180
Bidinato himself made the connection between these two issues, domestic crime and international

82
00:07:45.180 --> 00:07:53.740
peace, in a notorious series of attacks on Ron Paul back in 2007 and 2008, on his personal

83
00:07:53.740 --> 00:07:59.840
blog and in The New Individualist, the monthly magazine he was editing back then for the

84
00:07:59.840 --> 00:08:01.780
Atlas Society.

85
00:08:01.780 --> 00:08:07.660
Some people claim that Bidinato lost his job as editor of The New Individualist as a direct

86
00:08:07.660 --> 00:08:14.660
is a perfect result of these articles, which allegedly offended some wealthy objectivist Ron Paul supporters.

87
00:08:14.660 --> 00:08:19.660
He wrote on his blog in November 2007, for example, that there was

88
00:08:19.660 --> 00:08:25.660
an interesting parallel between Ron Paul's view of America's foreign enemies

89
00:08:25.660 --> 00:08:29.660
and the common liberal view of America's domestic criminals,

90
00:08:29.660 --> 00:08:33.660
for the same sort of arguments advanced by many libertarians

91
00:08:33.660 --> 00:08:45.700
have been offered by liberals to explain the heinous acts of common criminals.

92
00:08:45.700 --> 00:08:51.740
Read any sociology or criminology text, and you'll find endless laundry lists of causal

93
00:08:51.740 --> 00:09:00.540
explanations for crime, poverty, neglect, poor parenting, lousy schools, poor socialization,

94
00:09:00.540 --> 00:09:08.400
Inadequate prenatal care, hunger, disease, bullying, racism, police brutality, social

95
00:09:08.400 --> 00:09:15.540
stigmatizing, untreated psychological disorders, victimless crime laws, you name it.

96
00:09:15.540 --> 00:09:22.940
To Bidinato, back in November 2007, in what he now describes as a post of which I'm particularly

97
00:09:22.940 --> 00:09:28.860
proud, it seemed clear that these two positions were very closely related.

98
00:09:28.860 --> 00:09:35.180
Just as many libertarians like Ron Paul treat the actions of al-Qaeda and other terrorists

99
00:09:35.180 --> 00:09:41.500
as blowback for the sins of American society against them, he wrote, liberal social science

100
00:09:41.500 --> 00:09:47.760
professionals treat the actions of homegrown criminal thugs as blowback for the alleged

101
00:09:47.760 --> 00:09:51.480
sins of American society against them.

102
00:09:51.480 --> 00:09:57.680
These bloody acts are never the terrorists' or the criminals' fault, responsibility,

103
00:09:57.680 --> 00:09:58.680
you see.

104
00:09:58.680 --> 00:10:22.680
You may remember that during the Cold War, precisely the same sort of explanations were offered by liberals, and later by left libertarians such as Murray Rothbard, to lay the blame for communist aggression at the West's, especially America's, doorstep.

105
00:10:22.680 --> 00:10:31.240
It was our imperialist provocations around the world that were driving the Soviet block to respond

106
00:10:31.240 --> 00:10:37.240
by conquering and butchering millions, building weapons of mass destruction, constructing the

107
00:10:37.240 --> 00:10:45.400
Berlin Wall, etc. It was our economic and cultural imperialism that was driving indigenous peoples

108
00:10:45.400 --> 00:10:52.440
everywhere into the arms of the communists. I defy anyone to draw a rational meaningful

109
00:10:52.440 --> 00:11:00.840
Distinction between such explanations for criminal or terrorist aggression and excuses for it.

110
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:08.200
After all, causal explanations for human actions aim at exonerating the actor for committing them,

111
00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:14.120
by treating those acts as if they were not under the actor's conscious volitional control,

112
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:21.960
but as if they were instead deterministically driven responses to external provocations or causes.

113
00:11:22.440 --> 00:11:30.640
Just as I reject the liberal excuse-making industry that denies volition and rationalizes the acts of criminals,

114
00:11:30.640 --> 00:11:36.940
I am totally fed up with the disgraceful foreign policy perspectives of those libertarians

115
00:11:36.940 --> 00:11:42.140
who portray the United States as the causal agent of every evil on earth,

116
00:11:42.140 --> 00:11:47.940
thus rationalizing the atrocities of foreign terrorists and despots.

117
00:11:47.940 --> 00:11:54.100
Well, I guess if I were assigned the task of composing a detailed reply to this indictment,

118
00:11:54.100 --> 00:12:01.220
I'd probably begin by pointing out that neither Ron Paul nor any other libertarian I've ever encountered

119
00:12:01.220 --> 00:12:08.740
in print or in person has ever said that the 9-11 terrorists, or anyone else in the Middle East,

120
00:12:08.740 --> 00:12:16.180
has ever been victimized by American society. Some liberals do make this claim about criminals,

121
00:12:16.180 --> 00:12:22.260
But no libertarian makes it about people abroad who have grievances against the US government.

122
00:12:22.260 --> 00:12:26.100
The US government is not American society.

123
00:12:26.900 --> 00:12:33.700
Further, neither Ron Paul nor any other libertarian I've ever encountered in print or in person

124
00:12:33.700 --> 00:12:40.580
has ever said that the 9-11 terrorists or any other terrorists anywhere were not responsible

125
00:12:40.580 --> 00:12:46.580
The Theory of Money and Credit

126
00:12:46.580 --> 00:12:52.580
The Theory of Money and Credit

127
00:13:10.580 --> 00:13:22.260
Is making war really the best response to a terrorist attack like the one that took place

128
00:13:22.260 --> 00:13:25.420
on September 11, 2001?

129
00:13:25.420 --> 00:13:31.520
So one would deduce from the public pronouncements of leading objectivists over the past decade.

130
00:13:31.520 --> 00:13:36.500
One receives the definite impression that few, if any, of these leading objectivists

131
00:13:36.500 --> 00:13:43.380
have ever met a war they didn't like or at least believed with the grim firm-jawed determination

132
00:13:43.380 --> 00:13:48.900
they felt was appropriate to a Randian hero was somehow necessary.

133
00:13:48.900 --> 00:13:55.740
A war is a campaign of mass destruction and mass murder carried out by governments.

134
00:13:55.740 --> 00:14:02.260
In what morally coherent sense could such a thing be deemed necessary?

135
00:14:02.260 --> 00:14:08.420
Ayn Rand herself was never so simplistic about war as her followers of today are.

136
00:14:08.420 --> 00:14:16.200
Wars, she wrote in 1967, are the second greatest evil that human societies can perpetrate.

137
00:14:16.200 --> 00:14:21.300
The first is dictatorship, the enslavement of their own citizens, which is the cause

138
00:14:21.300 --> 00:14:22.500
of wars.

139
00:14:22.500 --> 00:14:27.920
When a nation resorts to war, it has some purpose, rightly or wrongly, something to

140
00:14:27.920 --> 00:14:33.280
to Fight for, and the only justifiable purpose is self-defense.

141
00:14:33.280 --> 00:14:39.680
As I hope most libertarians of today do remember, Rand could see no such justification for the

142
00:14:39.680 --> 00:14:41.940
U.S. presence in Vietnam.

143
00:14:41.940 --> 00:14:48.320
She called the war the U.S. government participated in for nearly two decades in Southeast Asia

144
00:14:48.320 --> 00:14:54.200
a war in which American soldiers are dying for no purpose whatever.

145
00:14:54.200 --> 00:15:00.660
There was a sense, though, in which Rand saw the Vietnam War as no worse, no more blameworthy

146
00:15:00.660 --> 00:15:05.840
than any of the other wars the U.S. government had been involved in during the 20th century.

147
00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:12.420
There still are people in this country, she wrote in 1974, who lost loved ones in World

148
00:15:12.420 --> 00:15:13.660
War I.

149
00:15:13.660 --> 00:15:20.700
There are more people who carry the unhealed wounds of World War II, of Korea, of Vietnam.

150
00:15:20.700 --> 00:15:25.860
There are the disabled, the crippled, the mangled of those wars' battlefields.

151
00:15:25.860 --> 00:15:32.100
No one has ever told them why they had to fight, nor what their sacrifices accomplished.

152
00:15:32.100 --> 00:15:35.820
It was certainly not to make the world safe for democracy.

153
00:15:35.820 --> 00:15:37.620
Look at that world now.

154
00:15:37.620 --> 00:15:43.880
The American people have borne it all, trusting their leaders, hoping that someone knew the

155
00:15:43.880 --> 00:15:46.900
purpose of that ghastly devastation.

156
00:15:46.900 --> 00:15:53.500
The United States gained nothing from those wars except the growing burden of paying reparations

157
00:15:53.500 --> 00:15:59.880
to the whole world, the kind of burden that used to be imposed on a defeated nation.

158
00:15:59.880 --> 00:16:04.960
There was a dark pessimistic side to Rand's sense of life, certainly.

159
00:16:04.960 --> 00:16:09.300
Think of We the Living and of the opening chapters in Atlas Shrugged.

160
00:16:09.300 --> 00:16:16.020
But Rand never seemed completely consumed by fear and vengeful anger in the way her contemporary

161
00:16:16.020 --> 00:16:17.540
Followers do.

162
00:16:17.540 --> 00:16:23.360
And this is a tragedy, because Rand and objectivism were such an important force for good in the

163
00:16:23.360 --> 00:16:27.000
early history of the contemporary libertarian movement.

164
00:16:27.000 --> 00:16:31.380
There was a time when it seemed that most libertarians were Randians.

165
00:16:31.380 --> 00:16:36.740
And even if that's a slight, or more than slight, exaggeration, the Randian influence

166
00:16:36.740 --> 00:16:41.300
on the early contemporary movement was undeniably substantial.

167
00:16:41.300 --> 00:16:46.300
When the Society for Individual Liberty did a study of libertarian party members in the

168
00:16:46.300 --> 00:16:52.960
early 1970s, they found that more than a third of them were self-described objectivists.

169
00:16:52.960 --> 00:17:00.080
As recently as 2008, the Liberty Poll, conducted by Liberty Magazine, reported that the thinker

170
00:17:00.080 --> 00:17:06.060
who most influenced our respondents' intellectual development was Ayn Rand.

171
00:17:06.060 --> 00:17:12.200
And though, as I've said, her outlook on things did have its dark corners, Ayn Rand was basically

172
00:17:12.200 --> 00:17:17.140
an exponent of a bold, adventurous, confident sense of life.

173
00:17:17.140 --> 00:17:22.260
The sort of sense of life you'd expect to be associated with libertarian ideas.

174
00:17:22.260 --> 00:17:26.020
Her heroes weren't generals or people in law enforcement.

175
00:17:26.020 --> 00:17:31.440
They were engineers, inventors, designers, people focused on what they could do with

176
00:17:31.440 --> 00:17:32.940
their lives.

177
00:17:32.940 --> 00:17:39.180
People preoccupied with the supposed menace to all their hopes and dreams, posed by a

178
00:17:39.180 --> 00:17:46.220
vast army of almost unimaginably vicious antagonists who seek to destroy them for no reason at

179
00:17:46.220 --> 00:17:47.340
all.

180
00:17:47.340 --> 00:17:53.860
One is reminded of Benjamin R. Tucker's observation that libertarian anarchists of his stripe

181
00:17:53.860 --> 00:17:57.660
were just un-terrified Jeffersonian Democrats.

182
00:17:57.660 --> 00:18:02.780
If Tucker thought the Jeffersonians were terrified because of their determination to cling to

183
00:18:02.780 --> 00:18:08.280
To the institution of government, what would he think of today's objectivists?

184
00:18:08.280 --> 00:18:13.460
Of course Robert Bidinato and his fellow fear mongers will tell you that they're terrified

185
00:18:13.460 --> 00:18:15.400
with perfectly good reason.

186
00:18:15.400 --> 00:18:21.500
After all, haven't we been victimized by terrorist attacks in the last decade?

187
00:18:21.500 --> 00:18:23.720
Did not thousands die?

188
00:18:23.720 --> 00:18:27.620
But the events of 9-11 did not terrify the objectivists.

189
00:18:27.620 --> 00:18:31.920
They were already terrified for no reason long before that.

190
00:18:31.920 --> 00:18:38.480
They merely use the 9-11 attacks as a pretext in an effort to make their terror look less

191
00:18:38.480 --> 00:18:42.880
irrational and absurd than it actually is.

192
00:18:42.880 --> 00:18:48.800
Bidinato told me via email over the weekend that he doesn't advocate the sort of vigilantism

193
00:18:48.800 --> 00:18:50.920
that figures in his novel.

194
00:18:50.920 --> 00:18:56.860
He wrote, and I quote this with his permission, the vigilantism in the novel is intended solely

195
00:18:56.860 --> 00:19:03.380
as a fictional device to highlight and dramatize the complete absence of justice in the current

196
00:19:03.380 --> 00:19:04.700
legal system.

197
00:19:04.700 --> 00:19:10.600
I deliberately crafted the vigilante character in the novel to hold a clear, specific code

198
00:19:10.600 --> 00:19:14.060
of honor regarding his illegal actions.

199
00:19:14.060 --> 00:19:16.320
He only kills killers.

200
00:19:16.320 --> 00:19:21.880
He does not target public officials with violence, but only with poetic justice.

201
00:19:21.880 --> 00:19:25.040
He takes no actions that will threaten innocence.

202
00:19:25.040 --> 00:19:29.080
And he would rather be arrested than use violence against cops.

203
00:19:29.080 --> 00:19:34.880
But in the real world, vigilantism would never be subject to such honorable constraints.

204
00:19:34.880 --> 00:19:41.520
Instead, it would degenerate into a violent competition of reprisals and vendettas, unlimited

205
00:19:41.520 --> 00:19:45.480
by any moral or legal principle.

206
00:19:45.480 --> 00:19:51.520
Does Bidinato not see that this is an excellent description of exactly how his beloved war

207
00:19:51.520 --> 00:19:58.320
War on Terror has worked out in practice, and of how it must work out in practice.

208
00:19:58.320 --> 00:20:03.600
The U.S. government claims that its actions are subject to honorable constraints, and that

209
00:20:03.600 --> 00:20:08.040
it strives to avoid taking actions that will threaten innocence.

210
00:20:08.040 --> 00:20:14.620
But this is the real world, and in the real world, whatever high-minded platitudes politicians

211
00:20:14.620 --> 00:20:21.460
and military people may mouth, war is never anything but a violent competition of reprisals

212
00:20:21.460 --> 00:20:38.840
Can anything be done about this unfortunate development in the evolution of objectivism

213
00:20:38.840 --> 00:20:41.820
as a movement and as a subculture?

214
00:20:41.820 --> 00:20:42.820
Perhaps not.

215
00:20:42.820 --> 00:20:48.420
In a very perceptive blog post written just this past April, Bidinato wrote about what

216
00:20:48.420 --> 00:20:54.580
What he called the form in which we really encounter and accept our foundational beliefs

217
00:20:54.580 --> 00:20:58.120
about ourselves and the world around us.

218
00:20:58.120 --> 00:21:05.180
We first encounter and accept these foundational beliefs, according to Bidinato, early in life

219
00:21:05.180 --> 00:21:09.820
and in the form of stories, or what I call narratives.

220
00:21:09.820 --> 00:21:16.100
The myths that we learn in childhood, at mother's knee, in church, in schools, in films and

221
00:21:16.100 --> 00:21:23.100
Novels represent primitive fundamental interpretive stories about our world, how it works, what

222
00:21:23.100 --> 00:21:28.800
it means, what is right or wrong, who are the good guys and the bad guys.

223
00:21:28.800 --> 00:21:34.980
These narratives are pre-philosophical, in fact they are acquired in their germinal forms

224
00:21:34.980 --> 00:21:40.280
while we are still far too young to subject them to critical analysis.

225
00:21:40.280 --> 00:21:47.060
They thus actually tend to determine which abstract philosophies, ideologies, economic

226
00:21:47.060 --> 00:21:51.480
theories and political policies we later find appealing.

227
00:21:51.480 --> 00:21:58.700
These latter feel right to us, largely because they mesh with the myths, fairy tales, parables

228
00:21:58.700 --> 00:22:02.680
and stories we already absorbed during childhood.

229
00:22:02.680 --> 00:22:09.840
Moreover, the more deep-rooted the myth, either personally and or culturally, the more desperately

230
00:22:09.840 --> 00:22:11.420
Certainly we cling to it.

231
00:22:11.420 --> 00:22:17.480
We cling to it even when it may sometimes be utterly false and lead us over a cliff.

232
00:22:17.480 --> 00:22:24.460
We cling to it because to challenge or criticize it means to unravel a lifetime of investments

233
00:22:24.460 --> 00:22:30.800
in values, choices, relationships, careers, emotions and money.

234
00:22:30.800 --> 00:22:33.440
And who wants to do that?

235
00:22:33.440 --> 00:22:35.240
Who indeed?

236
00:22:35.240 --> 00:22:37.560
Not I think Robert Bidinato.

237
00:22:37.560 --> 00:22:43.920
He confesses in this blog post that I've found it to be increasingly pointless to argue philosophy,

238
00:22:43.920 --> 00:22:47.160
economics and politics with most people.

239
00:22:47.160 --> 00:22:48.280
Why?

240
00:22:48.280 --> 00:22:50.520
Because we are talking past each other.

241
00:22:50.520 --> 00:22:55.160
You may prove a point with unassailable facts and irrefutable logic.

242
00:22:55.160 --> 00:23:01.880
However, the other person replies, yes, but those words usually signal that you've reached

243
00:23:01.880 --> 00:23:06.520
the ultimate barrier to further reasoning and communication.

244
00:23:06.520 --> 00:23:15.000
have challenged his narrative, and in my experience, that is ground he'll rarely, if ever, concede.

245
00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:19.980
I think everyone who has listened up to this point knows what sort of narrative defines

246
00:23:19.980 --> 00:23:22.380
the world for Robert Bidinato.

247
00:23:22.380 --> 00:23:25.760
You can get a taste of it in his new novel, Hunter.

248
00:23:25.760 --> 00:23:29.200
It makes for an absorbing read, as I've indicated.

249
00:23:29.200 --> 00:23:34.220
But as a guide to real life and the real world, it is sorely skewed.

250
00:23:34.220 --> 00:23:35.900
It's too bad, really.

251
00:23:35.900 --> 00:23:40.860
From what small dealings I've had with him, I'd say that Robert Bitonato is a good guy.

252
00:23:40.860 --> 00:23:45.900
He's highly intelligent, with a genuine knack for putting words together, and on top of

253
00:23:45.900 --> 00:23:51.480
that, he has the good sense to grasp the truth about the importance of private property and

254
00:23:51.480 --> 00:23:54.340
free markets to civilization.

255
00:23:54.340 --> 00:23:58.860
It's damned inconvenient for the rest of us in the libertarian movement that he and so

256
00:23:58.860 --> 00:24:03.020
many others like him are so damned terrified.

257
00:24:03.020 --> 00:24:18.020
This is Jeff Riggenbach.