WEBVTT

NOTE Robert Nozick (1938–2002)

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.000
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with Jeff Rigenbach.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:19.000
Early in 1970, at the age of 23, I did something I'd never done before.

3
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:24.000
Yes, yes, I know, people of that age often stick their necks out in such fashion.

4
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:29.160
but in my case the thing I'd never done before wasn't particularly daring or

5
00:00:29.160 --> 00:00:35.520
dangerous it was merely unusual perhaps even eccentric what I did was subscribe

6
00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:40.880
to an academic scholarly philosophy journal it was a quarterly called the

7
00:00:40.880 --> 00:00:45.480
personalist and it was published by the University of Southern California it

8
00:00:45.480 --> 00:00:50.280
still is though under a different name the Pacific philosophical quarterly and

9
00:00:50.280 --> 00:01:01.280
and at a rather different price. In the early 1970s, it cost $5 a year. Today, it costs a little less than $100 a year.

10
00:01:01.280 --> 00:01:06.280
Anyway, I'm not sure how many years I kept that subscription to The Personalist going.

11
00:01:06.280 --> 00:01:13.280
In fact, I'm guessing when I say I subscribed to it early in 1970, though that does seem likely.

12
00:01:13.280 --> 00:01:25.280
The earliest issue I still own is dated Spring 1970, and it's only necessary to scan the table of contents of that issue to figure out why I might have subscribed.

13
00:01:25.280 --> 00:01:34.280
There it is, right smack in the middle of that table of contents, an article called Rational Egoism by Nathaniel Brandon.

14
00:01:34.280 --> 00:01:40.820
In 1970, I almost certainly still thought of myself as, and here's a quaint phrase from

15
00:01:40.820 --> 00:01:44.120
yesteryear, a student of objectivism.

16
00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:50.200
I was still in the process of changing my self-identification from student of objectivism

17
00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:54.280
to libertarian strongly influenced by Ayn Rand.

18
00:01:54.280 --> 00:02:01.240
I had, however, rejected Ayn Rand's demand two years earlier, in 1968, that I condemn

19
00:02:01.240 --> 00:02:26.160
The public and acrimonious break between Ayn Rand and Nathaniel Brandon was known around

20
00:02:26.160 --> 00:02:29.560
the country as the Rand-Brandon split.

21
00:02:29.560 --> 00:02:34.400
It led to a nearly fatal implosion of the original objectivist movement.

22
00:02:34.400 --> 00:02:40.160
Nathaniel Brandon had been Rand's chief disciple and had built that original objectivist movement

23
00:02:40.160 --> 00:02:45.840
from scratch, centering it around the lectures and other activities sponsored by his Nathaniel

24
00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:52.440
Brandon Institute, NBI, headquartered in the basement of New York's Empire State Building,

25
00:02:52.440 --> 00:02:58.500
and centering it also around the theoretical and polemical articles published in The Objectivist,

26
00:02:58.500 --> 00:03:02.340
the monthly magazine he co-edited with Ayn Rand.

27
00:03:02.340 --> 00:03:09.020
When all this blew up in 1968, thousands of young students of objectivism began gradually

28
00:03:09.020 --> 00:03:11.940
to self-identify as libertarians.

29
00:03:11.940 --> 00:03:18.240
Meanwhile, Brandon moved to Los Angeles, where he had first met Rand two decades before while

30
00:03:18.240 --> 00:03:20.920
an undergraduate at UCLA.

31
00:03:20.920 --> 00:03:27.140
His ex-wife, Barbara Brandon, who had managed NBI, lectured there on the principles of efficient

32
00:03:27.140 --> 00:03:33.060
Thinking and served also as a prolific writer for The Objectivist, had moved back to L.A.

33
00:03:33.060 --> 00:03:34.820
at about the same time.

34
00:03:34.820 --> 00:03:40.700
When they arrived they found a number of important intellectual allies waiting to receive them.

35
00:03:40.700 --> 00:03:46.620
One of these was a philosophy professor named John Hospers who had enjoyed a close and intense

36
00:03:46.620 --> 00:03:52.620
intellectual friendship with Rand in the early 1960s in New York when he was teaching at

37
00:03:52.620 --> 00:03:54.300
Brooklyn College.

38
00:03:54.300 --> 00:03:59.840
Hospers had moved out to L.A. within a year or so of meeting Rand, but had stayed in touch

39
00:03:59.840 --> 00:04:05.320
via the U.S. mail and frequent flights back to New York for personal visits.

40
00:04:05.320 --> 00:04:10.640
His relationship with Rand had ended by her choice in 1962.

41
00:04:10.640 --> 00:04:15.860
Unsurprisingly for anyone who knows much about Rand, the problem seems to have been that

42
00:04:15.860 --> 00:04:21.800
she found Hospers' attitude toward her and her work to fall too far short of what she

43
00:04:21.800 --> 00:04:49.800
In any case, John Hospers was excommunicated by Rand in 1962, but his enthusiasm for Rand's ideas never flagged, nor did his willingness to publicly acknowledge that enthusiasm.

44
00:04:49.800 --> 00:04:55.520
It is important to remember that Hospers was in his forties, with nearly two decades of

45
00:04:55.520 --> 00:05:00.720
solid achievement behind him, as well as the acceptance and approval of the mainstream

46
00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:02.280
academic world.

47
00:05:02.280 --> 00:05:07.780
He was one of the first professors of comparable academic stature to pay serious attention

48
00:05:07.780 --> 00:05:14.780
to Rand's ideas, or to any other modern libertarian ideas, since, well, since at least the time

49
00:05:14.780 --> 00:05:19.780
in the time of World War II, when those ideas were first offered to the world at large.

50
00:05:19.780 --> 00:05:25.380
Hospers included a brief discussion of Rand's approach to ethical egoism in later editions

51
00:05:25.380 --> 00:05:31.220
of his widely adopted textbook, Introduction to Philosophical Analysis, and discussed the

52
00:05:31.220 --> 00:05:38.180
same ideas at somewhat greater length in later editions of his other widely adopted textbook,

53
00:05:38.180 --> 00:05:42.020
Human Conduct, An Introduction to the Problems of Ethics.

54
00:05:42.020 --> 00:05:47.980
In 1971, he would publish one of the first books on the modern libertarian movement,

55
00:05:47.980 --> 00:05:51.780
Libertarianism, a political philosophy for tomorrow.

56
00:05:51.780 --> 00:05:57.540
In 1972, he would become the first presidential candidate of the newly founded Libertarian

57
00:05:57.540 --> 00:06:02.720
Party and the only one ever to win any electoral votes.

58
00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:09.040
But in 1970, when I seem to have subscribed to the personalist, all this was in the future.

59
00:06:09.040 --> 00:06:15.200
In 1970, what I knew about John Hospers was that he had known Ayn Rand and had discussed

60
00:06:15.200 --> 00:06:21.280
her ideas in a way I thought was respectful in the newest editions of his two textbooks.

61
00:06:21.280 --> 00:06:26.240
I knew also that Hospers had become chair of the philosophy department of the University

62
00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:33.680
of Southern California in 1968 and had become editor of The Personalist at that same time.

63
00:06:33.680 --> 00:06:37.380
Would he use The Personalist to promote Rand's ideas?

64
00:06:37.380 --> 00:06:43.480
As best I can figure out at this juncture, four decades later, I subscribed to The Personalist

65
00:06:43.480 --> 00:06:47.160
to find out the answer to that question.

66
00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:52.680
The short answer to my question turned out to be, no, Hosper's didn't really use The

67
00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:58.380
Personalist to promote Rand's ideas, but he did publish some articles of definite interest

68
00:06:58.380 --> 00:07:01.960
to students of objectivism and other libertarians.

69
00:07:01.960 --> 00:07:07.220
There was not only Nathaniel Brandon's two-part article on rational egoism in the issues

70
00:07:07.220 --> 00:07:10.060
Issues for Spring and Summer 1970.

71
00:07:10.060 --> 00:07:16.100
There was also an article in the Spring 1971 issue by Tibor McCann on the Rationale for

72
00:07:16.100 --> 00:07:23.380
Human Rights, an article by Eric Mack in the Autumn 1971 issue on Ethical Egoism, and

73
00:07:23.380 --> 00:07:29.220
a short piece on Government by Robert Lefebvre in the Winter 1972 issue.

74
00:07:29.220 --> 00:07:34.340
By that time, I see now, the price inflation of the Nixon and Carter years had begun to

75
00:07:34.340 --> 00:07:36.260
set in with a vengeance.

76
00:07:36.260 --> 00:07:40.700
The price for a year's subscription had gone up to $6.

77
00:07:40.700 --> 00:07:47.180
Most important of all for our present purposes, the spring 1971 issue of The Personalist contained

78
00:07:47.180 --> 00:07:54.020
an article entitled, On the Randian Argument, by someone I had never heard of before, a

79
00:07:54.020 --> 00:07:59.420
professor of philosophy at no less than Harvard, named Robert Nozick.

80
00:07:59.420 --> 00:08:05.700
This article marked what I think could rightfully be called Nozick's debut as a libertarian,

81
00:08:05.700 --> 00:08:12.100
his first public acknowledgement that he regarded the ideas of thinkers like Rand as worth considering

82
00:08:12.100 --> 00:08:14.780
and worth seriously discussing.

83
00:08:14.780 --> 00:08:20.540
Up to that time, only a handful of libertarians had known about Nozick's interest in their

84
00:08:20.540 --> 00:08:26.420
theories, and most, if not all, of that handful were frequenters of Murray Rothbard's legendary

85
00:08:26.420 --> 00:08:28.540
Manhattan living room.

86
00:08:28.540 --> 00:08:34.180
One of that handful, Ralph Reiko, recalls first meeting or at least hearing about Robert

87
00:08:34.180 --> 00:08:41.900
Rothbard Nozick in the very late 1950s or very early 1960s threw a mutual friend, who,

88
00:08:41.900 --> 00:08:45.940
like Nozick, was a graduate student of philosophy at Princeton.

89
00:08:45.940 --> 00:08:51.740
This mutual friend, Reiko recalls, brought Nozick over to Rothbard's apartment one evening.

90
00:08:51.740 --> 00:08:57.280
It must have been in the early 60s, he writes, for what turned out to be the first of many

91
00:08:57.280 --> 00:09:00.980
long nights of discussion and debate.

92
00:09:00.980 --> 00:09:04.380
And those nights of discussion and debate were fruitful.

93
00:09:04.380 --> 00:09:10.080
Eventually, they led to much more than a short article in a philosophy journal on Ayn Rand's

94
00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:12.740
argument for ethical egoism.

95
00:09:12.740 --> 00:09:19.140
This became evident in the fall of 1974, three years after the publication of that article

96
00:09:19.140 --> 00:09:25.200
in The Personalist, when a new book appeared on the scene, amid considerable fanfare.

97
00:09:25.200 --> 00:09:30.540
A book called Anarchy, State and Utopia, by Robert Nozick.

98
00:09:30.540 --> 00:09:36.020
In the opening pages Nozick confessed to his readers that over the preceding several years

99
00:09:36.020 --> 00:09:42.300
he had found myself becoming convinced of, as they are now often called, libertarian

100
00:09:42.300 --> 00:09:48.220
views, and that this process had been touched off by a long conversation about six years

101
00:09:48.220 --> 00:09:50.780
ago with Murray Rothbard.

102
00:09:50.780 --> 00:09:55.460
About six years before the publication of Anarchy, State and Utopia would have been

103
00:09:55.460 --> 00:09:59.340
in around 1967 or 1968.

104
00:09:59.340 --> 00:10:05.460
But it wasn't Rothbard's version of anarcho-capitalism that Nozick had found himself becoming convinced

105
00:10:05.460 --> 00:10:09.460
of during the late 1960s and early 1970s.

106
00:10:09.460 --> 00:10:16.720
Rather, it was a version of minarchism, a version not unlike the one promoted by Ayn Rand.

107
00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:18.120
As Nozick put it,

108
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:24.020
Our main conclusions about the state are that a minimal state limited to the narrow functions

109
00:10:24.020 --> 00:10:32.140
of Protection Against Force, Theft, Fraud, Enforcement of Contracts, and so on, is justified,

110
00:10:32.140 --> 00:10:37.760
that any more extensive state will violate persons' rights not to be forced to do certain

111
00:10:37.760 --> 00:10:44.860
things, and is unjustified, and that the state may not use its coercive apparatus for the

112
00:10:44.860 --> 00:10:51.140
purpose of getting some citizens to aid others, or in order to prohibit activities to people

113
00:10:51.140 --> 00:11:00.180
The State, Nozick argued, had no business prohibiting or even regulating what he famously

114
00:11:00.180 --> 00:11:05.700
called capitalist acts between consenting adults.

115
00:11:05.700 --> 00:11:10.940
Anarchy State and Utopia made something of a sensation in 1974.

116
00:11:10.940 --> 00:11:17.180
It was reviewed by all the major mainstream publications and not always with disapproval.

117
00:11:17.180 --> 00:11:22.580
It became, at least by the standards ordinarily applied to books on political philosophy,

118
00:11:22.580 --> 00:11:24.080
a bestseller.

119
00:11:24.080 --> 00:11:26.060
It won the National Book Award.

120
00:11:26.060 --> 00:11:29.900
It was promptly translated into 11 other languages.

121
00:11:29.900 --> 00:11:35.260
More important from our point of view here at the libertarian tradition, it remade the

122
00:11:35.260 --> 00:11:39.940
attitude of the intellectual mainstream toward libertarianism.

123
00:11:39.940 --> 00:11:46.340
As Roderick Long puts it in a 2002 article in The Freeman, Nozick did something unthinkable

124
00:11:46.340 --> 00:11:49.180
in Polite Intellectual Society.

125
00:11:49.180 --> 00:11:52.940
He published a book defending libertarianism.

126
00:11:52.940 --> 00:11:59.600
Back then, in 1974, Long writes, libertarian ideas had virtually no presence within the

127
00:11:59.600 --> 00:12:01.660
academic establishment.

128
00:12:01.660 --> 00:12:07.940
Free market economists F. A. Hayek and Milton Friedman had not yet won their Nobel Prizes.

129
00:12:07.940 --> 00:12:12.720
Hayek's would come later that year, and Friedman's two years after that.

130
00:12:12.720 --> 00:12:18.200
And the reigning political philosopher was Nozick's own colleague, John Rawls, whose

131
00:12:18.200 --> 00:12:24.680
monumental treatise A Theory of Justice had won widespread acclaim for its argument that

132
00:12:24.680 --> 00:12:30.920
individuals should be allowed to benefit from their greater wealth, talent or effort only

133
00:12:30.920 --> 00:12:34.960
so long as they compensated the less fortunate.

134
00:12:34.960 --> 00:12:40.440
Long stresses that Nozick's book did not, of course, convert the profession, but it

135
00:12:40.440 --> 00:12:47.280
It secured for libertarianism a place among the standard topics for philosophical discussion,

136
00:12:47.280 --> 00:12:53.120
and thereby contributed to a crucial change in the intellectual climate.

137
00:12:53.120 --> 00:12:57.620
Libertarianism was no longer the philosophical equivalent of flat earth theory.

138
00:12:57.620 --> 00:13:05.200
It was now a respectable, or at least semi-respectable, position that had to be taken into account.

139
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:12.320
Robert Nozick thus paved the way for succeeding generations of libertarians in academia.

140
00:13:12.320 --> 00:13:18.220
Rothbard saw the situation in similar terms, writing a little over a year after the publication

141
00:13:18.220 --> 00:13:24.480
of Anarchy, State and Utopia that the work has had great importance in making the topics

142
00:13:24.480 --> 00:13:30.820
of libertarianism and anarchism respectable for the first time in philosophy courses and

143
00:13:30.820 --> 00:13:36.820
and paving the way for libertarians to write term papers and dissertations in a previously

144
00:13:36.820 --> 00:13:39.580
verboten area.

145
00:13:39.580 --> 00:13:45.580
Roderick Long, who is himself both a philosophy professor and a libertarian, has written that

146
00:13:45.580 --> 00:13:51.900
Nozick disappointed many readers by declining to defend his book against the many criticisms

147
00:13:51.900 --> 00:13:53.380
it received.

148
00:13:53.380 --> 00:13:58.640
Remarking that he didn't want to spend his life writing variations on the son of anarchy

149
00:13:58.640 --> 00:14:05.360
State and Utopia, he largely dropped political philosophy and moved on to other topics.

150
00:14:05.360 --> 00:14:09.120
And aside from a handful of essays, this is largely true.

151
00:14:09.120 --> 00:14:17.080
The big exceptions came in 1989 in his mostly apolitical book, The Examined Life, in which

152
00:14:17.080 --> 00:14:21.440
he startled libertarians all over the country by writing that,

153
00:14:21.440 --> 00:14:37.840
The libertarian position I once propounded now seems to me seriously inadequate, in part because it did not fully knit the humane considerations and joint cooperative activities it left room for more closely into its fabric.

154
00:14:37.840 --> 00:14:57.840
It neglected the symbolic importance of an official political concern with issues or problems as a way of marking their importance or urgency, and hence of expressing, intensifying, channeling, encouraging, and validating our private actions and concerns toward them.

155
00:14:57.840 --> 00:15:06.840
Joint goals that the government ignores completely tend to appear unworthy of our joint attention, and hence to receive little.

156
00:15:06.840 --> 00:15:19.340
There are some things we choose to do together through government in solemn marking of our human solidarity, served by the fact that we do them together in this official fashion.

157
00:15:19.340 --> 00:15:28.840
This certainly sounds like a recanting of the main conclusions about the state that Nozick said informed anarchy, state and utopia.

158
00:15:28.840 --> 00:15:36.280
But, in an interview conducted in July 2001, he stated that he had never stopped self-identifying

159
00:15:36.280 --> 00:15:42.960
as a libertarian, and Roderick Long reports that in his last book, Invariances, Nozick

160
00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:49.400
identified voluntary cooperation as the core principle of ethics, maintaining that the

161
00:15:49.400 --> 00:15:56.440
duty not to interfere with another person's domain of choice is all that any society should

162
00:15:56.440 --> 00:16:03.840
would coercively demand higher levels of ethics involving positive benevolence represent instead

163
00:16:03.840 --> 00:16:11.080
a personal ideal that should be left to a person's own individual choice and development.

164
00:16:11.080 --> 00:16:17.160
And that certainly sounds like an attempt to embrace libertarianism all over again.

165
00:16:17.160 --> 00:16:22.320
My own view is that Nozick's thinking about these matters evolved over time, and that

166
00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:27.120
But what he wrote at any given time was an accurate reflection of what he was thinking

167
00:16:27.120 --> 00:16:28.720
at that time.

168
00:16:28.720 --> 00:16:34.000
When he was in his twenties, having newly discovered libertarian ideas, having read

169
00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:40.960
Rand, Rothbard, Mises, Hayek and others, having met Rothbard and conversed with him at length,

170
00:16:40.960 --> 00:16:46.240
Nozick was fired up with excitement and wrote a book in which he proclaimed his agreement

171
00:16:46.240 --> 00:16:48.440
with libertarian ideas.

172
00:16:48.440 --> 00:16:54.000
A dozen years later, some reservations belatedly occurred to him, and he wrote about those

173
00:16:54.000 --> 00:16:56.800
in his then-current book.

174
00:16:56.800 --> 00:17:02.360
Another dozen years and those reservations no longer seemed to loom so large or to present

175
00:17:02.360 --> 00:17:08.520
such insoluble problems, and his last book reflects this final stage in the evolution

176
00:17:08.520 --> 00:17:12.400
of his thinking about politics and society.

177
00:17:12.400 --> 00:17:19.600
Robert Nozick died from stomach cancer a few months after that 2001 interview, in January

178
00:17:19.600 --> 00:17:23.080
2002, at the age of 63.

179
00:17:23.080 --> 00:17:28.120
He was born on November 16, 1938, in Brooklyn.

180
00:17:28.120 --> 00:17:33.040
Ralph Reiko wrote of him at the time of his death that Bob Nozick was as intellectually

181
00:17:33.040 --> 00:17:36.400
sharp as anyone I ever met.

182
00:17:36.400 --> 00:17:42.060
Bear in mind that Reiko had met not only Murray Rothbard, but also Ludwig von Mises, among

183
00:17:42.060 --> 00:17:55.060
As we mark what would have been Robert Nozick's 72nd birthday, let us acknowledge our good fortune at having a man of his caliber among us for as long as we did.

184
00:17:55.060 --> 00:17:57.060
This is Jeff Riggenbach.

185
00:18:12.060 --> 00:18:14.060
www.fieggen.org