WEBVTT

NOTE Roy A. Childs, Jr. (1949–1992)

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.000
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with Jeff Rigenbach.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:20.000
Roy Allen Childs, Jr. was born January 4, 1949 in Buffalo, New York.

3
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:25.000
Had he lived, he would have just turned 62 years old about a week ago.

4
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:41.000
He once told his close friend, Joan Kennedy Taylor, that he first became interested in political issues at the age of nine and by the time he entered high school in 1962, he had begun reading some of the classics of libertarian and individualist thought.

5
00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:45.000
He continued to do so during the remainder of his years in high school.

6
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:57.000
He told Joan that he read Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead in 1965 and found it so disturbing in light of some of the religious ideas he had been taught that he burned his copy.

7
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:07.000
But, Joan recalled, in the early 1990s, shortly after Child's death, he recovered and went on to read Anthem and Atlas Shrugged.

8
00:01:07.000 --> 00:01:12.080
He reported he was enthralled by Ludwig von Mises' Human Action the Christmas before

9
00:01:12.080 --> 00:01:18.600
he was 17, that Rose Wilder Lane's Discovery of Freedom, more than any other book, made

10
00:01:18.600 --> 00:01:24.080
him a libertarian, and that the two predominant intellectual influences on him during these

11
00:01:24.080 --> 00:01:30.280
years were Ayn Rand and Leonard Reed of the Foundation for Economic Education.

12
00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:36.020
After graduating from high school in 1966, Childs enrolled at the nearby State University

13
00:01:36.020 --> 00:01:42.680
of New York at Buffalo, determined to earn a Ph.D. and get a job as a college or university

14
00:01:42.680 --> 00:01:43.680
professor.

15
00:01:43.680 --> 00:01:49.680
But during his freshman year, as Joan told the tale in the early 1990s, he became interested

16
00:01:49.680 --> 00:01:56.300
in the teachings of Robert Lefebvre and his freedom school, and in 1967 he won one of

17
00:01:56.300 --> 00:02:01.340
forty full-tuition scholarships to Lefebvre's comprehensive course.

18
00:02:01.340 --> 00:02:07.600
Lafave had given his Freedom School, established in 1957, the summer before Atlas Shrugged

19
00:02:07.600 --> 00:02:10.740
was published, a new name by this time.

20
00:02:10.740 --> 00:02:17.340
It was now Rampart College, and Lafave was busily hiring faculty and making plans for

21
00:02:17.340 --> 00:02:23.480
the school to become an accredited degree-granting four-year libertarian college, as soon as

22
00:02:23.480 --> 00:02:27.740
all the necessary details were worked out.

23
00:02:27.740 --> 00:02:33.220
Roy Childs made a big impression on Lefebvre and on his teachers and fellow students in

24
00:02:33.220 --> 00:02:36.820
the comprehensive course that summer of 67.

25
00:02:36.820 --> 00:02:42.780
Scarcely had the course been completed, then, as Joan recalled, the Rampart College Newsletter

26
00:02:42.780 --> 00:02:48.500
announced a new Pine Tree Features Syndicate, which would distribute columns by writers

27
00:02:48.500 --> 00:02:54.660
such as Murray Rothbard, F. A. Harper, the founder of the Institute for Humane Studies,

28
00:02:54.660 --> 00:03:02.660
Robert Lefebvre, economist Hans Zenholz, and some graduates of the course, including R.A. Childs, Jr.

29
00:03:02.660 --> 00:03:11.660
Columns of his were distributed by Pine Tree Features in 1967 and 1968, and in the spring of 1968,

30
00:03:11.660 --> 00:03:18.660
Rampart Journal brought out his first published article, The Contradiction in Objectivism.

31
00:03:18.660 --> 00:03:29.160
The contradiction Childs believed was bedeviling objectivism from within was essentially the same one Murray Rothbard had identified about a decade earlier.

32
00:03:29.160 --> 00:03:36.160
If you followed Ayn Rand's arguments about the nature of government and individual rights to their logical conclusion,

33
00:03:36.160 --> 00:03:41.660
you would have to conclude that the state was an illegitimate institution that should be abolished.

34
00:03:41.660 --> 00:03:48.160
In other words, Ayn Rand, if she were as consistent as she always claimed to be, would be an anarchist.

35
00:03:48.160 --> 00:03:55.160
At this point, Childs was 19 years old, just finishing up his sophomore year in college.

36
00:03:55.160 --> 00:04:01.240
He quit college at the end of the spring 1968 term, however, to join the Rampart College

37
00:04:01.240 --> 00:04:04.400
teaching staff as an assistant instructor.

38
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:08.200
He even packed up and moved to Larkspur, Colorado.

39
00:04:08.200 --> 00:04:13.360
But within a few months of his arrival, the entire Freedom School enterprise, including

40
00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:25.360
Robert Lefebvre moved what was left of Rampart College, mainly its home study course, to Southern California.

41
00:04:25.360 --> 00:04:33.360
Childs went back to Buffalo and back to his college classrooms in the fall of 1968 and continued working,

42
00:04:33.360 --> 00:04:41.360
not only on his courses, but also on his argument on the contradiction in the objectivist position on political philosophy.

43
00:04:41.360 --> 00:05:11.360
By the following summer, the summer of 69, he felt he'd finally perfected it. He rewrote it, in the form of an open letter to Ayn Rand herself, and submitted it to The Rational Individualist, a small circulation monthly being published in suburban Washington D.C. by a group of former students of objectivism who called themselves the Society for Rational Individualism, S.R.I. An open letter to Ayn Rand,

44
00:05:11.360 --> 00:05:25.360
Objectivism and the State, by R. A. Childs, Jr., appeared in the August 1969 issue of The Rational Individualist, along with an editorial introduction by Jarrett Wallstein of SRI.

45
00:05:25.360 --> 00:05:35.360
Wallstein wrote that SRI had changed its declaration of principle because Mr. R. A. Childs had convinced them that any government was immoral.

46
00:05:35.360 --> 00:05:42.800
SRI, which had aspired to succeed the recently defunct Nathaniel Brandon Institute as the

47
00:05:42.800 --> 00:05:48.120
institutional home of the objectivist movement, had just taken a stand that would separate

48
00:05:48.120 --> 00:05:53.520
it forever from any officially sanctioned objectivist movement, a stand that was more

49
00:05:53.520 --> 00:05:56.000
Rothbardian than Randian.

50
00:05:56.000 --> 00:06:02.440
You might say that SRI was one of Roy Child's first big victories in his campaign to sell

51
00:06:02.440 --> 00:06:13.880
The Fall of 1969 was, of course, a busy season for the nascent libertarian movement.

52
00:06:13.880 --> 00:06:20.240
At the same time SRI had jumped the Randian ship and turned Rothbardian, the student activists

53
00:06:20.240 --> 00:06:25.240
who had made up the libertarian caucus of the conservative youth organization Young

54
00:06:25.240 --> 00:06:33.320
Among Americans for Freedom, YAF, had decided to walk out of YAF en masse and seek institutional

55
00:06:33.320 --> 00:06:36.100
support for their activities elsewhere.

56
00:06:36.100 --> 00:06:43.360
That fall, SRI merged with the former Libertarian Caucus of YAF to create the Society for Individual

57
00:06:43.360 --> 00:06:50.400
Liberty, SIL, and it did not take the leadership of the new organization long at all to conclude

58
00:06:50.400 --> 00:06:56.400
that the increasingly influential Mr. R. A. Childs should be lured away from his current

59
00:06:56.400 --> 00:07:03.020
career as an undergraduate at SUNY Buffalo to become the associate editor of The Individualist,

60
00:07:03.020 --> 00:07:09.000
the new format of The Rational Individualist, and to run the SIL book service.

61
00:07:09.000 --> 00:07:15.320
And so it was that Childs left SUNY again at the end of the spring term of 1970 to take

62
00:07:15.320 --> 00:07:19.800
a job with SIL in Silver Spring, Maryland.

63
00:07:19.800 --> 00:07:25.040
After two years on the job, Childs had an idea, which he took to Robert Kephart, the

64
00:07:25.040 --> 00:07:31.200
publisher of Human Events, an anti-communist weekly headquartered in Washington, D.C.

65
00:07:31.200 --> 00:07:36.680
Kephart had thought himself a conservative, but had been convinced by a series of conversations

66
00:07:36.680 --> 00:07:42.160
with Childs that he was, in fact, something else, a libertarian.

67
00:07:42.160 --> 00:07:47.560
Childs sketched for Kephart his new idea, his grand vision of a growing, prospering

68
00:07:47.560 --> 00:07:55.360
and Libertarian Movement, led by a crusading, muckraking magazine to be called Libertarian Review.

69
00:07:55.360 --> 00:07:57.960
And Kephart had been sold up to a point.

70
00:07:57.960 --> 00:08:03.380
He allowed Childs to talk him into buying the stock and the mailing list from the SIL

71
00:08:03.380 --> 00:08:04.340
Book Service.

72
00:08:04.340 --> 00:08:09.440
He allowed Childs to talk him into trademarking the name Libertarian Review.

73
00:08:09.440 --> 00:08:14.200
But he balked at the idea of launching a full-scale magazine just yet.

74
00:08:14.200 --> 00:08:20.920
Instead, he beefed up the old SIL book review, adding pages and new reviewers, and changing

75
00:08:20.920 --> 00:08:25.160
the publication's name to Books for Libertarians.

76
00:08:25.160 --> 00:08:30.920
Kephart reasoned that if Books for Libertarians grew and prospered, then after a few years

77
00:08:30.920 --> 00:08:33.000
it could be expanded further.

78
00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:38.800
He had in mind going to a tabloid format, reminiscent of the New York Review of Books,

79
00:08:38.800 --> 00:08:43.880
trotting out the libertarian review name he was holding in reserve, and ending up with

80
00:08:43.880 --> 00:08:47.080
with a libertarian version of the New York Review.

81
00:08:47.080 --> 00:08:51.600
This was a little different from Child's vision, but it was something Child's could live with

82
00:08:51.600 --> 00:08:52.940
very easily.

83
00:08:52.940 --> 00:08:58.580
He enjoyed the sorts of long review essays the New York Review specialized in, and he

84
00:08:58.580 --> 00:09:02.040
looked forward to writing such pieces himself.

85
00:09:02.040 --> 00:09:07.720
Child settled in as editor of books for libertarians, and settled back down to this latest phase

86
00:09:07.720 --> 00:09:13.020
of the work which brought him early fame in the libertarian movement, the work of introducing

87
00:09:13.020 --> 00:09:28.420
It is uncertain whether Childs first encountered Rothbard's works during his freshman year

88
00:09:28.420 --> 00:09:34.020
at SUNY Buffalo, or a few months later when he was taking Robert Lefebvre's comprehensive

89
00:09:34.020 --> 00:09:38.640
course at Rampart College in the summer before his sophomore year.

90
00:09:38.640 --> 00:09:44.140
But encounter them he did, somewhere around 1966 or 67.

91
00:09:44.140 --> 00:09:51.400
He seems to have met Rothbard in person sometime in 1968 or 1969 when he was about 20 years

92
00:09:51.400 --> 00:09:58.120
old, through Ralph Reiko, a Rothbardian professor of European history at SUNY Buffalo and a

93
00:09:58.120 --> 00:10:02.360
long-time personal friend and associate of Rothbard's.

94
00:10:02.360 --> 00:10:07.680
Childs was mightily impressed by what he read inside the covers of Rothbard's books and

95
00:10:07.680 --> 00:10:14.320
by what he heard from Rothbard himself in that famous living room at 215 West 88th Street,

96
00:10:14.320 --> 00:10:19.360
and he was determined to pass his enlightenment along to the students of objectivism who had

97
00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:25.440
begun flooding the libertarian movement after the 1968 collapse of the Nathaniel Brandon

98
00:10:25.440 --> 00:10:31.400
Institute and the subsequent implosion of the objectivist movement.

99
00:10:31.400 --> 00:10:35.600
Rothbard was something of an admirer of Ayn Rand, within limits.

100
00:10:35.600 --> 00:10:40.840
He first met her in the early 1950s when she moved back to New York from Hollywood after

101
00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:44.940
writing the screen adaptation of her novel The Fountainhead.

102
00:10:44.940 --> 00:10:47.440
At that time he didn't much like her.

103
00:10:47.440 --> 00:10:53.060
But as Rothbard biographer Justin Raimondo puts it, when Atlas Shrugged shot to the top

104
00:10:53.060 --> 00:10:59.720
of the bestseller lists in the fall of 1957, Rothbard had to sit up and take notice.

105
00:10:59.720 --> 00:11:05.720
This was, he thought, a dramatic breakthrough for the mass dissemination of libertarian ideas.

106
00:11:05.720 --> 00:11:17.720
A book, albeit a novel, explicitly advocating laissez-faire capitalism and the centrality of private property as the basic organizing principle of a free society.

107
00:11:17.720 --> 00:11:23.720
How could he not feel sympathetic and even enthusiastic about the success of such a book?

108
00:11:23.720 --> 00:11:43.720
Perhaps more important in the long run, the new mass following Rand was attracting for libertarian ideas was, Rothbard felt, generally ill-read and in need of education in several key areas, and the thought of playing an important role in educating these people was genuinely appealing to him.

109
00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:51.720
Not so appealing, however, that he found he could tolerate the company of Rand and her inner circle in order to undertake such a role.

110
00:11:51.720 --> 00:12:09.720
It was, therefore, ten years before students of objectivism were introduced to Rothbardianism in any substantial numbers, and when it happened, the man who made it happen was not Rothbard himself, but the youthful Roy Childs of Buffalo, New York.

111
00:12:09.720 --> 00:12:14.720
From Child's point of view, Rand and Rothbard had a lot in common.

112
00:12:14.720 --> 00:12:19.720
In terms of overall philosophy, they seemed to him to be virtually identical.

113
00:12:19.720 --> 00:12:28.720
Both of them believed in an objective reality that is knowable to all human beings willing to use their rational faculty to investigate it.

114
00:12:28.720 --> 00:12:33.720
Both believed in rational self-interest as a guide to personal action.

115
00:12:33.720 --> 00:12:37.720
Their main area of disagreement was in political philosophy.

116
00:12:37.720 --> 00:12:45.120
Rand insisted upon the necessity of a small, severely limited state. Rothbard was an anarchist.

117
00:12:45.120 --> 00:12:51.120
Hence, Child's opening sally in his crusade to convert Randians to Rothbardianism

118
00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:55.720
had been his argument that a consistent Randian must be an anarchist.

119
00:12:55.720 --> 00:13:04.320
And when he became editor of Books for Libertarians in 1972, he began running laudatory reviews of Rothbard's books,

120
00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:14.080
Man Economy and State, America's Great Depression, The Panic of 1819, Power and Market, What Has Government Done to Our Money,

121
00:13:14.080 --> 00:13:18.640
virtually everything Rothbard had published up to that time.

122
00:13:18.640 --> 00:13:23.940
The first issue of Books for Libertarians is dated July 1972.

123
00:13:23.940 --> 00:13:32.040
A little more than two years later, in October 1974, Books for Libertarians became Libertarian Review.

124
00:13:32.040 --> 00:13:46.340
About a year and a half after that, Libertarian Review abandoned the old newsletter format it had inherited from Books for Libertarians and went to a tabloid format, not unlike that of the New York Review of Books.

125
00:13:46.340 --> 00:13:55.840
With the previous issue, January-February 1976, Libertarian Review had converted to a bi-monthly publication schedule.

126
00:13:55.840 --> 00:14:00.560
But by the time all these changes took place, Childs was long gone.

127
00:14:00.560 --> 00:14:06.240
He didn't even stick around long enough to see Books for Libertarians become Libertarian Review.

128
00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:11.120
He didn't last even two years as editor of Books for Libertarians.

129
00:14:11.120 --> 00:14:19.200
His first issue was July 72. His last was April 74. A 25-year-old has-been,

130
00:14:19.200 --> 00:14:24.000
he had been ignominiously fired from the publication that was his idea,

131
00:14:24.000 --> 00:14:30.640
His creation. His baby. And why? For repeatedly failing to meet his deadlines.

132
00:14:31.920 --> 00:14:39.120
I met Roy Childs in the fall of 1972, only a few months after he started Books for Libertarians,

133
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:45.440
and I knew him for 20 years. In all that time, I never knew him to pay much heed to deadlines.

134
00:14:45.440 --> 00:14:50.560
Whether he was writing something or editing something, he did it at his own pace, and he

135
00:14:50.560 --> 00:14:57.560
Bob Kephart, on the other hand, wanted to get each issue of Books for Libertarians done and done on time.

136
00:14:57.560 --> 00:15:01.560
He didn't see any other way for it to break through to financial independence.

137
00:15:01.560 --> 00:15:05.560
So, he let Childs go and hired a replacement.

138
00:15:05.560 --> 00:15:09.560
Childs wasn't going to take this setback lying down.

139
00:15:09.560 --> 00:15:11.560
But neither was he.

140
00:15:11.560 --> 00:15:15.560
He didn't see any other way for it to break through to financial independence.

141
00:15:15.560 --> 00:15:19.560
So, he let Childs go and hired a replacement.

142
00:15:49.560 --> 00:16:01.560
In our time, one child's an all-expenses-paid trip to Brussels for the 1974 meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society, where he mingled with just such people as this.

143
00:16:01.560 --> 00:16:18.560
Another piece, The Invisible Hand Strikes Back, a devastatingly clever dissection of Harvard philosopher Robert Nozick's National Book Award-winning Anarchy, State and Utopia, was first presented at the Third Libertarian Scholars Conference in 1975.

144
00:16:18.560 --> 00:16:20.320
in 1975.

145
00:16:20.320 --> 00:16:29.360
Childs also spoke at the 1976 and 1977 libertarian scholars conferences, and in 1977 he became

146
00:16:29.360 --> 00:16:35.400
a research associate of the Center for Libertarian Studies in New York and a member of the editorial

147
00:16:35.400 --> 00:16:38.760
board of the Journal of Libertarian Studies.

148
00:16:38.760 --> 00:16:42.920
Eventually, what he had been working toward did come to pass.

149
00:16:42.920 --> 00:16:48.360
He managed to bring himself to the attention of Charles Koch, a wealthy Kansas oil man

150
00:17:18.360 --> 00:17:23.200
for Libertarians of Every Stripe, or, at least, of many stripes.

151
00:17:23.200 --> 00:17:28.520
He had already secured Murray Rothbard's agreement to write regularly for the New Libertarian

152
00:17:28.520 --> 00:17:34.760
Review, and he had recruited two Rothbardians, the historian Leonard Ligio and the economist

153
00:17:34.760 --> 00:17:37.800
Walter Grinder, as associate editors.

154
00:17:37.800 --> 00:17:43.400
Now he thought it would be nice to be able to add at least one Randian to the masthead.

155
00:17:43.400 --> 00:17:49.180
But it would have to be an unusually broad-minded Randian, one who could work with Rothbardians

156
00:17:49.180 --> 00:17:51.240
on an ongoing basis.

157
00:17:51.240 --> 00:17:55.700
And it would have to be a Randian who could write as knowledgably about current issues

158
00:17:55.700 --> 00:18:01.660
and events as the best of the Rothbardians, and do it with at least equal facility.

159
00:18:01.660 --> 00:18:05.420
It would have to be a Randian who could pull his own weight.

160
00:18:05.420 --> 00:18:07.660
Or her own weight.

161
00:18:07.660 --> 00:18:09.460
Now there was an idea.

162
00:18:09.460 --> 00:18:15.220
But where was there a female Randian who was knowledgeable about current issues and events,

163
00:18:15.220 --> 00:18:19.300
could write, and could be tolerant of Rothbardian anarchists?

164
00:18:19.300 --> 00:18:23.780
There was Joan Kennedy Taylor, of course, but she hadn't written anything on current

165
00:18:23.780 --> 00:18:28.980
issues and events in ten years, and would she be tolerant of the Rothbardians?

166
00:18:28.980 --> 00:18:33.020
Well, there could be no harm in trying.

167
00:18:33.020 --> 00:18:36.180
Childs tried, and again got what he wanted.

168
00:18:36.180 --> 00:18:46.180
By the time of his first issue, in July 1977, he had Joan Kennedy Taylor on his masthead as an associate editor, along with the Rothbardians.

169
00:18:46.180 --> 00:18:56.180
For the next four and a half years, Childs edited Libertarian Review, following it across the country when its offices moved from New York to San Francisco,

170
00:18:56.180 --> 00:19:02.180
and following it back again when it moved again, this time from San Francisco to Washington D.C.

171
00:19:02.180 --> 00:19:03.180
See.

172
00:19:03.180 --> 00:19:09.620
When it ceased publication at the end of 1981, he moved on to a position at the Cato Institute,

173
00:19:09.620 --> 00:19:13.540
where he edited books and wrote articles on foreign policy.

174
00:19:13.540 --> 00:19:18.860
From there, in the mid-1980s, he moved back to New York and became editorial director

175
00:19:18.860 --> 00:19:24.500
of Laissez-Faire Books, where he was responsible for reading through new titles coming on the

176
00:19:24.500 --> 00:19:30.700
market in history, philosophy, economics and current issues, making preliminary decisions

177
00:19:30.700 --> 00:19:35.660
is about which of these titles laissez-faire books ought to carry, and writing reviews

178
00:19:35.660 --> 00:19:39.440
of most of the books the company did end up carrying.

179
00:19:39.440 --> 00:19:44.920
These reviews were published in the monthly laissez-faire review, which doubled, of course,

180
00:19:44.920 --> 00:19:47.000
as a mail-order catalogue.

181
00:19:47.000 --> 00:19:53.020
It is in this role, as the author of what Brian Doherty aptly calls detailed and erudite

182
00:19:53.020 --> 00:19:58.980
reviews for the monthly catalogue of libertarian mail-order bookseller laissez-faire books,

183
00:19:58.980 --> 00:20:02.500
But Childs is probably best remembered today.

184
00:20:02.500 --> 00:20:08.980
As early as 1994, ten years after he took the job at laissez-faire books, and two years

185
00:20:08.980 --> 00:20:15.740
after his untimely death at the age of 43, Joan Kennedy Taylor wrote that many people

186
00:20:15.740 --> 00:20:20.460
only know Roy as the premier book reviewer for laissez-faire books.

187
00:20:20.460 --> 00:20:25.860
In her estimation, among the qualities that won him a multitude of fans during those years

188
00:20:25.860 --> 00:20:32.100
were his vast reading, which he often used to place the book he was discussing in a wider context,

189
00:20:32.100 --> 00:20:37.060
his willingness to point out disagreements he had with the book he was recommending,

190
00:20:37.060 --> 00:20:40.340
and, above all, his unquenchable enthusiasm.

191
00:20:41.700 --> 00:20:48.260
Child's importance in the libertarian tradition extends far beyond his work as a writer, however.

192
00:20:48.260 --> 00:20:53.060
Even at his worst, he was a pretty good writer. At times, he was very good.

193
00:20:53.060 --> 00:20:58.900
But journalism is always a race, a race that's usually followed by a compromise.

194
00:20:58.900 --> 00:21:03.780
You seldom have enough time to get a piece into the shape you'd really like it to have.

195
00:21:04.340 --> 00:21:10.340
You have only so much time, and you often have to settle for the best you could do in the time you

196
00:21:10.340 --> 00:21:16.420
had as a substitute for the best you could do. The haste with which he always had to write

197
00:21:16.420 --> 00:21:22.100
everything he wrote has marred a good deal of what Childs wrote, and one of the reasons his

198
00:21:22.100 --> 00:21:35.100
One of the reasons his own writing suffered from too much haste is that he spent too much of his time rewriting articles by other knowledgeable people who simply didn't write that well, at least at that stage in their careers.

199
00:21:35.100 --> 00:21:49.100
Also, time has passed. Part of what so impressed people about Roy's essays was the fact that here was an obviously brilliant mind writing fairly detailed assessments of current issues and events on the fly,

200
00:21:49.100 --> 00:21:59.100
Just like, to use names that loomed large in journalism at the time, William Buckley, Norman Podhoretz, Nat Hentoff or Nicholas von Hoffman.

201
00:21:59.100 --> 00:22:04.100
He wrote as well as they did at least much of the time, and he was even more astute.

202
00:22:04.100 --> 00:22:07.100
After all, he was a consistent libertarian.

203
00:22:07.100 --> 00:22:11.100
There were few other libertarian voices of that kind back then.

204
00:22:11.100 --> 00:22:17.100
From the standpoint of today, much that Roy wrote seems less brilliant than it did at the time,

205
00:22:17.100 --> 00:22:26.600
Because, with three decades of hindsight, it now seems obvious that his was the correct understanding of the events and issues he was writing about.

206
00:22:26.600 --> 00:22:29.600
He knew that, thirty years ago.

207
00:22:29.600 --> 00:22:33.100
But his brilliance extended far beyond his own writing.

208
00:22:33.100 --> 00:22:43.100
He was a gifted editor-in-chief, the kind of man who could talk well-established intellectuals into writing for his magazine for a tenth of what they'd earn

209
00:22:43.100 --> 00:22:50.100
and a fraction of the audience they'd reach if they sold the same article to Harper's or Esquire or the Atlantic.

210
00:22:50.100 --> 00:22:58.600
He was the kind of editor who planned issues months ahead, who saw the big picture, where the magazine was heading, and why.

211
00:22:58.600 --> 00:23:05.600
He was also, as Brian Doherty calls him, the sort of man whose presence put smiles on people's faces.

212
00:23:05.600 --> 00:23:31.200
He was the sort of figure all ideological movements need, the tireless networker, letter writer, phone caller, dedicated to a larger vision of a long-term libertarian project that extended beyond whatever work he happened to be doing, as dedicated to promoting and connecting other libertarian comrades as producing specific, tangible work of his own.

213
00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:39.700
At his peak in his late 20s and early 30s when he was editing libertarian review, he was, as Doherty puts it,

214
00:23:39.700 --> 00:23:47.200
the most consistent personal inspiration and support to a rising generation of young libertarians.

215
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:55.700
Roy Childs was one of the handful of people of whom it might be said that, had he not lived, had he not done what he did,

216
00:23:55.700 --> 00:24:00.200
the libertarian movement as we know it today would not exist.

217
00:24:00.200 --> 00:24:02.200
This is Jeff Riggenbach.