WEBVTT

NOTE The Ignorance of the New Yorker

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.540
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with

2
00:00:09.540 --> 00:00:12.840
Jeff Rigenbach.

3
00:00:12.840 --> 00:00:19.360
The August 30th issue of The New Yorker contained an article called Covert Operations by Jane

4
00:00:19.360 --> 00:00:20.720
Mayer.

5
00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:25.920
As of this writing, nearly halfway through September, the piece seems to have just begun

6
00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:28.860
to attract the attention of libertarians.

7
00:00:28.860 --> 00:00:34.160
But attract their attention it should, if only because it's an almost textbook quality

8
00:00:34.160 --> 00:00:40.480
example of what happens when you try to write about libertarianism in current events without

9
00:00:40.480 --> 00:00:45.560
having at least a basic understanding of the libertarian tradition.

10
00:00:45.560 --> 00:00:51.000
On the surface, Mayer's article is an expose of what she takes to be the perfidy of the

11
00:00:51.000 --> 00:01:21.000
by the Koch Brothers, Charles and David of Wichita, Kansas, particularly egregious in her mind is the case of David Koch, who has had the sheer effrontery to move from Wichita to Manhattan and, please imagine gasps of dismay in the background, sees for himself perhaps the most coveted social prize in the city, a trusteeship at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, by the simple expedient of becoming what Mayer calls

12
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:24.400
One of the city's most prominent philanthropists.

13
00:01:24.400 --> 00:01:30.900
She writes that Koch began giving spectacularly large donations to the arts and sciences during

14
00:01:30.900 --> 00:01:33.040
the early 1990s.

15
00:01:33.040 --> 00:01:37.720
He donated two and a half million dollars toward the American Ballet Theatre Company's

16
00:01:37.720 --> 00:01:42.140
upcoming season and had given many millions before that.

17
00:01:42.140 --> 00:01:47.680
Back in 2008, he donated a hundred million dollars to modernize Lincoln Center's New

18
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:51.720
New York State Theatre Building, which now bears his name.

19
00:01:51.720 --> 00:01:57.360
He has given $20 million to the American Museum of Natural History, whose dinosaur wing is

20
00:01:57.360 --> 00:01:58.920
named for him.

21
00:01:58.920 --> 00:02:03.920
This spring, after noticing the decrepit state of the fountains outside the Metropolitan

22
00:02:03.920 --> 00:02:09.680
Museum of Art, Koch pledged at least $10 million for their renovation.

23
00:02:09.680 --> 00:02:16.360
Meanwhile, Koch had also made himself into an important patron of cancer research, focusing

24
00:02:16.360 --> 00:02:18.420
on Prostate Cancer.

25
00:02:18.420 --> 00:02:24.500
He serves on the board of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, where, after he donated more

26
00:02:24.500 --> 00:02:30.580
than $40 million, an endowed chair and a research center were named for him.

27
00:02:30.580 --> 00:02:31.580
But wait!

28
00:02:31.580 --> 00:02:32.580
There's more!

29
00:02:32.580 --> 00:02:39.000
For in addition to his gifts to Sloan Kettering, he gave $15 million to New York Presbyterian

30
00:02:39.000 --> 00:02:47.640
in Hospital, $125 million to MIT for cancer research, $20 million to Johns Hopkins University,

31
00:02:47.640 --> 00:02:52.400
and $25 million to the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

32
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:59.800
Yet we must not be deceived, Mayor Cautions, for lurking behind this façade of the public-spirited

33
00:02:59.800 --> 00:03:07.320
benefactor and leader of polite and civil society is an evil anti-social monster, a man who

34
00:03:07.320 --> 00:03:34.680
In plain English, with all the muted hysteria removed, Charles and David Koch are guilty

35
00:03:34.680 --> 00:03:41.160
of using some of their money to fund organizations they think can help to advance the political

36
00:03:41.160 --> 00:03:46.960
ideals they believe in, even when those ideals are politically incorrect.

37
00:03:46.960 --> 00:03:53.320
This gross insensitivity to political correctness, this calling for drastically lower personal

38
00:03:53.320 --> 00:03:59.440
and corporate taxes, minimal social services for the needy, and much less oversight of

39
00:03:59.440 --> 00:04:05.880
of Industry, especially environmental regulation, is simply beyond the pale, of course. It's

40
00:04:05.880 --> 00:04:12.560
almost like publicly using the n-word or some comparable vulgarity. No wonder Mayer is driven

41
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:19.640
to approvingly quoting one Lee Fang of the liberal blog Think Progress, who has called

42
00:04:19.640 --> 00:04:26.480
the Kochs the billionaires behind the hate. Expression of libertarian ideas, you see,

43
00:04:26.480 --> 00:04:33.760
is a kind of hate speech. All this is the rankest nonsense, of course, and it is so

44
00:04:33.760 --> 00:04:40.760
because it is based on ignorance of the libertarian tradition. It is clear that Mayer hasn't the

45
00:04:40.760 --> 00:04:46.560
foggiest idea of what libertarianism is all about. It seems likely that she has made no

46
00:04:46.560 --> 00:04:52.960
effort at all to find out what it's all about. Instead, she has been content to go with what

47
00:04:52.960 --> 00:04:58.960
She Thought She Knew About Libertarianism, which runs roughly as follows.

48
00:04:58.960 --> 00:05:03.200
Libertarianism is a variety of conservatism.

49
00:05:03.200 --> 00:05:07.120
Libertarians are, you might say, the most extreme conservatives.

50
00:05:07.120 --> 00:05:11.480
We live in what is still essentially a free market society.

51
00:05:11.480 --> 00:05:17.520
A few trivial regulations have been placed on big corporations in this society after

52
00:05:17.520 --> 00:05:23.960
are great and usually futile struggles by well-meaning men and women who hope to protect the poor

53
00:05:23.960 --> 00:05:27.800
and defenseless from these rapacious corporations.

54
00:05:27.800 --> 00:05:31.840
But in the main, the free market is what we see around us.

55
00:05:31.840 --> 00:05:37.300
Conservatives, which includes libertarians, are working through such institutions as Fox

56
00:05:37.300 --> 00:05:43.760
News, the Tea Party movement, and the Republican Party to change government policy in an even

57
00:05:43.760 --> 00:05:46.520
more free-market direction.

58
00:05:46.520 --> 00:05:51.960
Conservatives want to cut back the pitiful handful of regulations the well-meaning men

59
00:05:51.960 --> 00:05:56.040
and women have managed to impose on big corporations.

60
00:05:56.040 --> 00:06:01.080
They want to cut back the few pitiful programs well-meaning men and women have managed to

61
00:06:01.080 --> 00:06:05.720
set up to ameliorate the misery of the poor.

62
00:06:05.720 --> 00:06:10.320
Libertarians want to end these regulations and programs altogether.

63
00:06:10.320 --> 00:06:16.120
They want to do these evil things because they want the rapacious big corporations to

64
00:06:16.120 --> 00:06:21.860
to have complete freedom to grind everyone else under their evil heel.

65
00:06:21.860 --> 00:06:27.840
These rapacious big corporations want free market policies because free market policies

66
00:06:27.840 --> 00:06:31.600
will guarantee them bigger profits.

67
00:06:31.600 --> 00:06:37.680
One can only shake one's head sadly at such a grotesque panoply of misinformation and

68
00:06:37.680 --> 00:06:39.800
outright falsehoods.

69
00:06:39.800 --> 00:06:44.280
One is tempted to dismiss anyone who takes it seriously as delusional.

70
00:06:44.280 --> 00:06:51.320
Yes, of course, something like this is what most Americans think they know about libertarianism.

71
00:06:51.320 --> 00:06:56.600
But this level of ignorance is simply inexcusable in an intellectual journalist, a person who

72
00:06:56.600 --> 00:07:02.880
writes professionally for periodical publication about recent developments and events in the

73
00:07:02.880 --> 00:07:04.860
world of ideas.

74
00:07:04.860 --> 00:07:10.080
Such a professional should always be guided by the knowledge that there is always more

75
00:07:10.080 --> 00:07:17.980
or to any given thing than meets the eye, particularly the uninformed, casually glancing eye.

76
00:07:17.980 --> 00:07:23.360
It is part of the job of the intellectual journalist to provide an accurate, if perhaps

77
00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:29.900
somewhat oversimplified, understanding of ideas that are commonly misunderstood.

78
00:07:29.900 --> 00:07:35.760
Yet Jane Mayer skips along blithely, promoting further misunderstanding.

79
00:07:35.760 --> 00:07:41.180
She writes, for example, of how Charles and David Koch were particularly influenced by

80
00:07:41.180 --> 00:07:46.860
the work of Friedrich von Hayek, and notes that there is little surprising in this, since

81
00:07:46.860 --> 00:07:53.540
Hayek's belief in unfettered capitalism has proved inspirational to many conservatives.

82
00:07:53.540 --> 00:07:59.000
She sees the Koch brothers as representative in a way of a recent trend.

83
00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:04.280
In recent decades, she writes, members of several industrial dynasties have spent parts

84
00:08:04.280 --> 00:08:27.280
She describes several planks in the 1980 libertarian party platform, which she takes as emblematic of the larger libertarian movement of the time, and notes that William F. Buckley Jr., a more traditional conservative, called the movement anarcho-totalitarianism.

85
00:08:27.280 --> 00:08:33.480
Then, in what can only be called a pièce de résistance of cluelessness, she describes

86
00:08:33.480 --> 00:08:38.840
the libertarian movement as a pro-corporate movement.

87
00:08:38.840 --> 00:08:44.880
This would be laughable, I suppose, if it were not such a common misperception already,

88
00:08:44.880 --> 00:08:50.060
and if the repetition of it in the pages of a nationally respected magazine weren't likely

89
00:08:50.060 --> 00:08:55.900
to further perpetuate one of the great urban myths of the world of ideas.

90
00:08:55.900 --> 00:09:02.780
The tacit assumption here, as I noted earlier, is that large corporations favor a laissez-faire

91
00:09:02.780 --> 00:09:06.140
policy, that they seek a free market.

92
00:09:06.140 --> 00:09:12.180
In fact, the overwhelming majority of corporations, exactly like the overwhelming majority of

93
00:09:12.180 --> 00:09:16.020
individuals, do not favor a free market.

94
00:09:16.020 --> 00:09:21.240
The overwhelming majority of corporations have never favored anything even remotely

95
00:09:21.240 --> 00:09:23.700
resembling a free market.

96
00:09:23.700 --> 00:09:30.260
They have favored a managed market, whether with themselves as the managers or with government

97
00:09:30.260 --> 00:09:34.120
doing the managing under their guidance and influence.

98
00:09:34.120 --> 00:09:38.960
It wasn't well-meaning men and women who hoped to protect the poor and defenseless

99
00:09:38.960 --> 00:09:45.020
from rapacious corporations that gave us the monstrous tangle of laws and commissions that

100
00:09:45.020 --> 00:09:48.500
now regulates business in this country.

101
00:09:48.500 --> 00:09:53.160
It was business itself that gave us these regulations.

102
00:09:53.160 --> 00:09:59.720
In most cases it was business itself, big business specifically, those giant corporations

103
00:09:59.720 --> 00:10:06.580
Jane Mayer and her ilk are so afraid of, that wrote these regulations.

104
00:10:06.580 --> 00:10:12.800
Regulation of business in this country is and always has been a device by which a handful

105
00:10:12.800 --> 00:10:18.720
of big corporations dominate the market with the government's assistance, using laws

106
00:10:18.720 --> 00:10:26.220
is to force the big corporations smaller competitors out of business and guarantee the big corporations

107
00:10:26.220 --> 00:10:32.920
stable shares of the market without the uncertainties and hazards of having to actually compete

108
00:10:32.920 --> 00:10:35.040
for customers.

109
00:10:35.040 --> 00:10:41.540
As Albert J. Nock put it seventy-five years ago, American business never followed a policy

110
00:10:41.540 --> 00:10:48.140
of laissez-faire, never wished to follow it, never wished the state to let it alone.

111
00:10:48.140 --> 00:10:55.900
As Knox saw it, a policy of economic individualism cannot exist where the state makes any positive

112
00:10:55.900 --> 00:11:00.900
interventions upon the individual in his economic capacity.

113
00:11:00.900 --> 00:11:07.620
It can exist only where the state confines itself to purely negative interventions, such

114
00:11:07.620 --> 00:11:13.380
as punishing fraud, enforcing the obligations of contract and the like.

115
00:11:13.380 --> 00:11:18.540
In this country, the state has made positive interventions upon the individual from the

116
00:11:18.540 --> 00:11:23.700
beginning, in rapidly increasing number and variety.

117
00:11:23.700 --> 00:11:28.540
And at whose behest did the state begin making these positive interventions?

118
00:11:28.540 --> 00:11:34.540
American business, Nock wrote, has sought state intervention at every tack and turn

119
00:11:34.540 --> 00:11:41.540
of its affairs, often, in fact, quite regularly, employing most disreputable measures to obtain

120
00:11:41.540 --> 00:11:42.540
it.

121
00:11:42.540 --> 00:11:47.460
All remember the cynical remark of one of our representative industrialists, that it

122
00:11:47.460 --> 00:11:51.560
was cheaper to buy legislatures than to buy voters?

123
00:11:51.560 --> 00:11:58.180
Worse yet, when the state made some primary intervention to confer an economic advantage,

124
00:11:58.180 --> 00:12:03.680
as in the case of our railways, for instance, and its beneficiaries got into a tangle with

125
00:12:03.680 --> 00:12:09.540
one another over the use of it, the regular thing has been to run to the state for another

126
00:12:09.540 --> 00:12:15.820
Another Intervention to Straighten the Tangle out, then another tangle, another agonized

127
00:12:15.820 --> 00:12:23.260
plea to the state, another intervention, which piled complication upon complication, particularity

128
00:12:23.260 --> 00:12:30.620
upon particularity, and then the same sequences, with ever multiplying complications and ever

129
00:12:30.620 --> 00:12:36.340
increasing particularity, repeated again and again.

130
00:12:36.340 --> 00:12:41.900
Who hectored the state into the shipping business, Nock demanded, and plumped for setting up

131
00:12:41.900 --> 00:12:43.260
the shipping board?

132
00:12:43.260 --> 00:12:47.780
Who pestered the state into setting up the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal

133
00:12:47.780 --> 00:12:49.040
Farm Board?

134
00:12:49.040 --> 00:12:54.260
Who got the state to go into the transportation business on our inland waterways?

135
00:12:54.260 --> 00:13:01.480
Who is always urging the state to regulate and supervise this, that and the other routine

136
00:13:01.480 --> 00:13:07.560
One Process of Financial, Industrial and Commercial Enterprise

137
00:13:07.560 --> 00:13:14.360
This was written, as I say, in 1935. It was published in a major American magazine and

138
00:13:14.360 --> 00:13:20.760
reprinted two years later in a collection of Nock's essays, Free Speech and Plain Language,

139
00:13:20.760 --> 00:13:26.200
which was brought out by a major American publisher, William Morrow and Company. Nock

140
00:13:26.200 --> 00:13:32.200
Hayek used the word libertarian to describe himself during this period and properly so.

141
00:13:32.200 --> 00:13:37.640
He was personally acquainted with many and exercised a direct intellectual influence

142
00:13:37.640 --> 00:13:44.000
on most of the founding fathers and mothers of the contemporary American libertarian movement,

143
00:13:44.000 --> 00:13:49.800
which got underway in the 1940s, during and just after World War II.

144
00:13:49.800 --> 00:13:55.680
It is difficult to do much research at all on contemporary American libertarianism without

145
00:13:55.680 --> 00:14:01.600
and at least repeatedly running across the name of Albert J. Nock.

146
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:07.380
The same might well be said about the name of Murray N. Rothbard, of whom movement historian

147
00:14:07.380 --> 00:14:13.160
Brian Doherty has rightly written that he was the most uniquely and characteristically

148
00:14:13.160 --> 00:14:19.740
libertarian of libertarians, the one whose influence explains most about what makes the

149
00:14:19.740 --> 00:14:26.760
The ideas, behavior and general flavor of American libertarianism unique, the most illustrative

150
00:14:26.760 --> 00:14:32.820
and paradigmatic of the foundational figures of modern libertarianism.

151
00:14:32.820 --> 00:14:38.620
Rothbard took Knox's points about economic intervention by government on behalf of corporations

152
00:14:38.620 --> 00:14:44.660
and reintroduced them into modern libertarian discourse nearly 50 years ago in a series

153
00:14:44.660 --> 00:14:50.760
These are articles that drew on historian Gabriel Kolko's then-current books The Triumph of

154
00:14:50.760 --> 00:14:54.940
Conservatism and Railroads and Regulation.

155
00:14:54.940 --> 00:15:00.380
It would be pretty hard to put very much effort into even a journalist's quick study of the

156
00:15:00.380 --> 00:15:06.380
contemporary American libertarian movement without repeatedly running into the name Murray

157
00:15:06.380 --> 00:15:08.240
Rothbard.

158
00:15:08.240 --> 00:15:14.380
There is, however, not the slightest evidence to support the claim that Jane Mayer, the celebrated

159
00:15:14.380 --> 00:15:21.420
and award-winning journalist has ever heard of, much less read, either Nock or Rothbard.

160
00:15:21.420 --> 00:15:26.780
If she had bothered to read those two luminaries of the libertarian tradition, she'd know

161
00:15:26.780 --> 00:15:32.980
that libertarians have been denouncing government policies designed to benefit corporations

162
00:15:32.980 --> 00:15:37.580
since at least two decades before she herself was born.

163
00:15:37.580 --> 00:15:42.940
And in fact, libertarians have been denouncing such policies far longer than that.

164
00:15:42.940 --> 00:15:51.440
It is Republicans, not Libertarians, who favor handouts to and special privileges for big corporations.

165
00:15:51.440 --> 00:15:55.480
And Republicans are not Libertarians.

166
00:15:55.480 --> 00:16:00.980
How should those of us who do know something about Libertarianism respond to Jane Mayer's

167
00:16:00.980 --> 00:16:03.340
historically illiterate article?

168
00:16:03.340 --> 00:16:08.880
I suppose we might weep and gnash our teeth and tear our hair over the state of intellectual

169
00:16:08.880 --> 00:16:14.560
Journalism these days, but perhaps we would do better to count our blessings, and remember

170
00:16:14.560 --> 00:16:20.120
that, as Oscar Wilde put it more than a hundred years ago, there is much to be said in favor

171
00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:22.000
of modern journalism.

172
00:16:22.000 --> 00:16:26.840
By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch with the ignorance of

173
00:16:26.840 --> 00:16:28.880
the community.

174
00:16:28.880 --> 00:16:43.680
This is Jeff Rigenbach.