WEBVTT

NOTE The New Libertarian Generation

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.000
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with Jeff Rigenbach.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:25.000
Mark Lilla is a professor of humanities at Columbia University, where he specializes in the history of ideas, in particular the intellectual legacy of the Enlightenment.

3
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:31.480
Now one of the principal intellectual legacies of the Enlightenment is the libertarian tradition.

4
00:00:31.480 --> 00:00:36.640
So it was not at all inappropriate that Lilla's article in last week's issue of the New York

5
00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:44.520
Review of Books, the issue dated May 27, 2010, is on the growing influence of libertarian

6
00:00:44.520 --> 00:00:47.320
ideas in American society.

7
00:00:47.320 --> 00:00:53.040
Lilla writes of, and these are his words, the libertarian impulses that have unsettled

8
00:00:53.040 --> 00:00:56.440
American Society for Half a Century Now.

9
00:00:56.440 --> 00:01:02.960
He writes of, again these are his words, the libertarian spirit that drifted into American

10
00:01:02.960 --> 00:01:09.880
life over the past 50 years, first from the left during the 1960s, then from the right

11
00:01:09.880 --> 00:01:12.000
during the Reagan 80s.

12
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:18.780
He writes pessimistically of how this libertarian spirit has spread to other areas of our lives,

13
00:01:18.780 --> 00:01:25.020
And he reserves his main pessimism and hand-wringing for the impact of this libertarian spirit

14
00:01:25.020 --> 00:01:27.460
on our national political life.

15
00:01:27.460 --> 00:01:32.960
Welcome, he writes, to the politics of the libertarian mob.

16
00:01:32.960 --> 00:01:38.860
The politics of the libertarian mob, according to Lilla, is a new strain of populism that

17
00:01:38.860 --> 00:01:45.180
is anarchistic like the 60s, selfish like the 80s, contradicting neither.

18
00:01:45.180 --> 00:01:51.380
He points out that historically populist movements have used the rhetoric of class solidarity

19
00:01:51.380 --> 00:01:58.620
to seize political power so that the people can exercise it for their common benefit.

20
00:01:58.620 --> 00:02:03.860
But the populist rhetoric of the libertarian mob is something altogether different.

21
00:02:03.860 --> 00:02:12.580
It fires up emotions by appealing to individual opinion, individual autonomy and individual choice.

22
00:02:12.580 --> 00:02:18.140
More important, according to Lilla, this new populist rhetoric of the libertarian mob is

23
00:02:18.140 --> 00:02:23.780
all in the service of neutralizing, not using, political power.

24
00:02:23.780 --> 00:02:29.300
It gives voice to those who feel they are being bullied, but this voice has only one

25
00:02:29.300 --> 00:02:34.320
garbo-like thing to say, I want to be left alone.

26
00:02:34.320 --> 00:02:39.300
This rhetoric, Lilla tells us, appeals to petulant individuals, convinced that they

27
00:02:39.300 --> 00:02:44.040
and that they can do everything themselves if they are only left alone and that others

28
00:02:44.040 --> 00:02:48.220
are conspiring to keep them from doing just that.

29
00:02:48.220 --> 00:02:54.020
And in Lilla's view, such petulant individuals are legion in America today.

30
00:02:54.020 --> 00:03:00.300
Many Americans, he writes, a vocal and varied segment of the public at large, have now convinced

31
00:03:00.300 --> 00:03:07.420
themselves that educated elites, politicians, bureaucrats, reporters, but also doctors,

32
00:03:07.420 --> 00:03:13.740
Scientists, even school teachers, are controlling our lives, and they want them to stop.

33
00:03:13.740 --> 00:03:18.820
They say they are tired of being told what counts as news, or what they should think

34
00:03:18.820 --> 00:03:24.280
about global warming, tired of being told what their children should be taught, how

35
00:03:24.280 --> 00:03:29.800
much of their paychecks they get to keep, whether to insure themselves, which medicines

36
00:03:29.800 --> 00:03:35.140
they can have, where they can build their homes, which guns they can buy, when they

37
00:03:35.140 --> 00:04:03.140
These disgruntled Americans, Lilla writes, have two classic American traits that have grown much more pronounced in recent decades, blanket distrust of institutions and an astonishing and unwarranted confidence in the self.

38
00:04:03.140 --> 00:04:13.640
They are apocalyptic pessimists about public life and childlike optimists swaddled in self-esteem when it comes to their own powers.

39
00:04:13.640 --> 00:04:22.640
This apocalyptic pessimism about public life that Lilla is talking about here has been showing up in major public opinion polls.

40
00:04:22.640 --> 00:04:31.140
As Lilla himself puts it, Americans have far less trust in their government today than they had up until the mid-60s,

41
00:04:31.140 --> 00:04:41.140
Just before the 2008 election, only a tenth of Americans said that they were satisfied with the way things are going in the United States.

42
00:04:41.140 --> 00:04:50.140
A record low. They express some confidence in the presidency and the courts, but when asked in the abstract about the government

43
00:04:50.140 --> 00:04:59.140
and whether they expect it to do the right thing or whether it is run for our benefit, a relatively consistent majority says no.

44
00:04:59.140 --> 00:05:12.140
Over the past half century, according to Lilla, a great many of these people have begun disinvesting in our political institutions and learning to work around them as individuals.

45
00:05:12.140 --> 00:05:18.140
The principal example he gives, and a very good one it is, is the homeschooling movement.

46
00:05:18.140 --> 00:05:25.140
A million and a half students in the United States, he writes, are now being taught by their parents at home,

47
00:05:25.140 --> 00:05:33.140
nearly double the number a decade ago, and representing about 15 students for every public school in the country.

48
00:05:33.140 --> 00:05:39.540
What's remarkable about this is American parents' confidence that they can do better themselves.

49
00:05:39.540 --> 00:05:45.140
Many of the more educated ones probably do, though they are hardly going it alone.

50
00:05:45.140 --> 00:05:51.340
They rely on a national but voluntary virtual school system connecting them online,

51
00:05:51.340 --> 00:05:55.580
where they circulate curricula, materials and research.

52
00:05:55.580 --> 00:06:01.460
More important, they are now a powerful political lobby, having redirected their energy from

53
00:06:01.460 --> 00:06:05.780
local school systems to Washington and state capitals.

54
00:06:05.780 --> 00:06:12.540
They are the only successful libertarian party, Lilla writes, in the United States.

55
00:06:12.540 --> 00:06:18.340
So far, I have to admit that I can't argue much with the essentials of Lilla's case.

56
00:06:18.340 --> 00:06:23.060
It seems to me that he's quite right when he claims that libertarian impulses and a

57
00:06:23.060 --> 00:06:28.860
libertarian spirit have been making themselves felt in various ways in American political

58
00:06:28.860 --> 00:06:31.900
life since the mid-1960s.

59
00:06:31.900 --> 00:06:36.900
It seems to me Lilla is right when he claims that the rhetoric used by those promoting

60
00:06:36.900 --> 00:06:44.460
libertarian ideas today, and also by those falsely claiming to promote libertarian ideas,

61
00:06:44.460 --> 00:06:50.760
of whom more in a few minutes, does appeal to individual opinion, individual autonomy

62
00:06:50.760 --> 00:06:52.980
and individual choice.

63
00:06:52.980 --> 00:06:58.100
It seems to me that Lilla is right when he claims that those promoting libertarian ideas

64
00:06:58.100 --> 00:07:05.180
today are bent on neutralizing, not using political power, and on empowering those who

65
00:07:05.180 --> 00:07:07.780
say they want to be left alone.

66
00:07:07.780 --> 00:07:13.460
It seems to me that Lilla is absolutely and incontrovertibly right when he claims that

67
00:07:13.460 --> 00:07:19.120
Millions of Americans are fed up with being told what counts as news, or what they should

68
00:07:19.120 --> 00:07:24.540
think about global warming, what their children should be taught, how much of their paychecks

69
00:07:24.540 --> 00:07:30.220
they get to keep, whether to insure themselves, which medicines they can have, where they

70
00:07:30.220 --> 00:07:35.540
can build their homes, which guns they can buy, when they have to wear seat belts and

71
00:07:35.540 --> 00:07:41.140
helmets, whether they can talk on the phone while driving, which foods they can eat, how

72
00:07:41.140 --> 00:07:45.420
How Much Soda They Can Drink, the list is long.

73
00:07:45.420 --> 00:07:50.620
Lilla is also right to claim that millions of Americans no longer believe government is

74
00:07:50.620 --> 00:07:56.580
run for their benefit and can no longer be counted upon to do the right thing.

75
00:07:56.580 --> 00:08:01.760
He is right to claim that millions of Americans have long since begun looking for ways to

76
00:08:01.760 --> 00:08:06.500
work around our useless and intrusive political institutions.

77
00:08:06.500 --> 00:08:11.620
And he is right to claim that the homeschooling movement is one of the best examples of this

78
00:08:11.620 --> 00:08:12.620
trend.

79
00:08:12.620 --> 00:08:18.060
He may even be right when he calls it the only successful libertarian party in the United

80
00:08:18.060 --> 00:08:19.540
States.

81
00:08:19.540 --> 00:08:24.420
All this rightness doesn't mean, however, that Lilla's article is perfect.

82
00:08:24.420 --> 00:08:26.580
Far from it, in fact.

83
00:08:26.580 --> 00:08:31.660
Consider the unfortunate title of the piece, which I know might well not have been chosen

84
00:08:31.660 --> 00:08:35.440
by the author, the Tea Party Jacobins.

85
00:08:35.440 --> 00:08:37.440
This is utterly misleading.

86
00:08:37.440 --> 00:08:42.700
In the first place, there is nothing even remotely libertarian about the Tea Parties.

87
00:08:42.700 --> 00:08:48.840
There is nothing even remotely libertarian about Fox News, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh

88
00:08:48.840 --> 00:08:55.700
or Sarah Palin, yet these are the specific examples Lilla refers to throughout his article

89
00:08:55.700 --> 00:09:02.140
as particular instances of the politics of the libertarian mob he so deplores.

90
00:09:02.140 --> 00:09:08.480
Now ask yourself, does either Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin have even the slightest interest

91
00:09:08.480 --> 00:09:15.660
in neutralizing, not using, political power? Does Glenn Beck do any of his colleagues on

92
00:09:15.660 --> 00:09:23.060
Fox News? Could you say of any of these conservative Republicans what Lilla says of the proponents

93
00:09:23.060 --> 00:09:28.840
of the libertarian spirit, that, and these are Lilla's words, they want to be people

94
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:30.840
without Rules?

95
00:09:30.840 --> 00:09:37.320
Merely to pose such questions in so open and bald-faced a manner is to see instantly

96
00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:42.680
what a preposterous absurdity we would have to pretend to believe in order to answer them

97
00:09:42.680 --> 00:09:44.720
in the affirmative.

98
00:09:44.720 --> 00:09:48.480
As Johnny Carson would say, it is to laugh.

99
00:09:48.480 --> 00:09:55.500
The only sense in which the likes of Limbaugh, Beck, Palin, the majority of the Tea Partiers,

100
00:09:55.500 --> 00:10:06.500
The best-known and most representative figures on Fox News may be said to represent the growing libertarian impulse or spirit in the land is this.

101
00:10:06.500 --> 00:10:21.500
Their employment of a lot of libertarian rhetoric that doesn't at all match the policies they endorse and proselytize for is in itself a kind of indirect symptom of the growth of the libertarian spirit.

102
00:10:21.500 --> 00:10:27.580
Conservatives have been using libertarian rhetoric for many decades now, but they've increased this

103
00:10:27.580 --> 00:10:34.620
tactic recently in response to the very phenomenon Lilla is writing about, the growing spread of the

104
00:10:34.620 --> 00:10:41.260
libertarian spirit through the land. Libertarian ideas have come to exercise enough influence

105
00:10:41.260 --> 00:10:47.820
among the general public that at least certain major party politicians and major media feel

106
00:10:47.820 --> 00:10:59.820
Another point about Lilla's title, the Tea Party Jacobins.

107
00:10:59.820 --> 00:11:05.340
The Jacobins were a faction within the original left during the French Revolution.

108
00:11:05.340 --> 00:11:11.180
Specifically, the Jacobins were the faction which demanded not just equality before the

109
00:11:11.180 --> 00:11:16.220
law, but equality in fact, equality of result.

110
00:11:16.220 --> 00:11:21.180
If Smith has more of something than Jones, take some of it away from Smith and give it

111
00:11:21.180 --> 00:11:22.640
to Jones.

112
00:11:22.640 --> 00:11:28.020
It is little wonder that the other thing the Jacobins are famous for besides their misguided

113
00:11:28.020 --> 00:11:34.020
egalitarianism, which arguably has led most of the left down the road to perdition in

114
00:11:34.020 --> 00:11:39.500
the two centuries since then, the other thing the Jacobins are famous for is their advocacy

115
00:11:39.500 --> 00:11:41.860
and practice of violence.

116
00:11:41.860 --> 00:11:46.940
And it's little wonder, as I say, because only the threat of violence would lead most

117
00:11:46.940 --> 00:11:52.980
people to accept the forced egalitarianism of the original Jacobins.

118
00:11:52.980 --> 00:11:59.140
Today's libertarians, the real libertarians, not the conservatives who now are so busily

119
00:11:59.140 --> 00:12:07.200
slinging insincere, phony libertarian rhetoric, are non-violent partisans of peace among individuals

120
00:12:07.200 --> 00:12:27.400
Mark Lilla also has a tendency, fairly common among those who write a lot about political

121
00:12:27.400 --> 00:12:33.280
topics, to think that politics naturally dominates all of human life.

122
00:12:33.280 --> 00:12:38.120
The result is that he sometimes tends to put the cart before the horse.

123
00:12:38.120 --> 00:12:44.900
He writes, for example, that, as the libertarian spirit has spread to other areas of our lives,

124
00:12:44.900 --> 00:12:49.740
along with distrust of elites generally, the damage has mounted.

125
00:12:49.740 --> 00:12:51.180
Take health care.

126
00:12:51.180 --> 00:12:56.940
Less than half of us say that we have great confidence in the medical establishment today,

127
00:12:56.940 --> 00:13:02.940
and the proportion of those who have hardly any has doubled since the early 70s.

128
00:13:02.940 --> 00:13:07.980
There are plenty of things wrong with the way medicine is practiced in the United States,

129
00:13:07.980 --> 00:13:12.620
but it does not follow from this that anybody can cure himself.

130
00:13:12.620 --> 00:13:18.900
Nonetheless, a growing number of us have become our own doctors and pharmacists, aided by

131
00:13:18.900 --> 00:13:24.660
internet search engines that substitute for refereed medical journals, the Food and Drug

132
00:13:24.660 --> 00:13:28.760
Administration, and the Centers for Disease Control.

133
00:13:28.760 --> 00:13:35.080
The trends, Lilla continues, are not encouraging. Because of irrational fear-mongering on the

134
00:13:35.080 --> 00:13:41.520
web, the percentage of unvaccinated American children, while thankfully still low, has

135
00:13:41.520 --> 00:13:48.880
been rising steadily in the 21 states that now allow personal exemptions for unspecified

136
00:13:48.880 --> 00:13:55.760
philosophical and personal reasons. This is significant. The chance of unvaccinated children

137
00:13:55.760 --> 00:14:03.640
From getting measles, to take just one example, is 22 to 35 times higher than that of immunized

138
00:14:03.640 --> 00:14:05.240
children.

139
00:14:05.240 --> 00:14:11.860
Americans currently spend over $4 billion a year on unregulated herbal medicines, despite

140
00:14:11.860 --> 00:14:17.520
total ignorance about their effectiveness, correct dosage and side effects.

141
00:14:17.520 --> 00:14:22.520
And of course, many dangerous medicines banned in the United States can now be purchased

142
00:14:22.520 --> 00:14:28.640
Online from Abroad, not to mention questionable medical procedures for those who can afford

143
00:14:28.640 --> 00:14:30.440
the airfare.

144
00:14:30.440 --> 00:14:34.800
The problems with this passage from Lilla's article are legion.

145
00:14:34.800 --> 00:14:40.480
Let's begin with the fact that nothing he describes here can properly be understood

146
00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:45.960
as the libertarian spirit spreading to other areas of our lives.

147
00:14:45.960 --> 00:14:54.960
Rather, it is a case of the spread from the culture generally of a generalized distrust of elites and other authorities,

148
00:14:54.960 --> 00:15:03.960
a spread of what I call decadent individualism into the political sphere, where it expresses itself as libertarianism.

149
00:15:03.960 --> 00:15:08.960
This is what happened in the 60s, when hippie individualism was born,

150
00:15:08.960 --> 00:15:16.400
and the libertarian movement, born 20 years before, received a massive injection of growth hormone.

151
00:15:16.400 --> 00:15:23.600
The general condition of cultural decadence that took hold in the late 1950s and early 1960s

152
00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:29.960
both discouraged individuals from taking the conventional wisdom in any field of inquiry

153
00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:36.880
with undue seriousness and encouraged them to think for themselves, make their own decisions

154
00:15:36.880 --> 00:15:42.880
and reach their own conclusions, even if those decisions and conclusions didn't match what

155
00:15:42.880 --> 00:15:45.160
most people believed.

156
00:15:45.160 --> 00:15:50.640
I published a book a few years back called In Praise of Decadence, in which I developed

157
00:15:50.640 --> 00:15:53.880
this line of argument at much greater length.

158
00:15:53.880 --> 00:15:59.220
It's still in print, and also widely available online from second-hand book dealers, who

159
00:15:59.220 --> 00:16:02.260
often offer it at extremely low prices.

160
00:16:02.260 --> 00:16:06.200
I urge you to track down a copy and see what you think.

161
00:16:06.200 --> 00:16:10.760
Whether you take me up on that suggestion or not, however, I'm sure you'll have guessed

162
00:16:10.760 --> 00:16:17.560
by now that the final major flaw in Mark Lilla's otherwise excellent and provocative article

163
00:16:17.560 --> 00:16:24.360
on The Tea Party Jacobins from the May 27th issue of the New York Review of Books is its

164
00:16:24.360 --> 00:16:30.840
smug assumption that people like Mark Lilla really do know more than you do about how

165
00:16:30.840 --> 00:16:36.720
How to Best Run Your Life and that they therefore have the right to force you to take their

166
00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:42.120
advice and run your life their way, whether you like it or not.

167
00:16:42.120 --> 00:16:49.200
The fact is that exactly as Mark Lilla fears, when people distrust authority in a generalized

168
00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:55.320
way and start thinking for themselves, often without much relevant information to guide

169
00:16:55.320 --> 00:16:59.320
them, they'll make many decisions that they'll later regret.

170
00:16:59.320 --> 00:17:06.260
But whose decisions are they to make? Is it your right to make your own decisions about

171
00:17:06.260 --> 00:17:11.960
how you're going to live your life? Or does that right belong to Mark Lilla and his fellow

172
00:17:11.960 --> 00:17:18.300
progressives because they smugly know that they'll do ever so much better with it than

173
00:17:18.300 --> 00:17:23.880
you will? That's the issue. This is Jeff Rigenbach.

174
00:17:29.320 --> 00:17:37.320
The Theory of Money and Credit