WEBVTT

NOTE Was Classical Liberalism a "Strife of Interests Masquerading as a Contest of Principles"?

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.000
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with Jeff Rigenbach.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:25.000
Ambrose Bierce famously defined politics as a strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles, the conduct of public affairs for private advantage.

3
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:34.000
Harry Elmer Barnes never quotes this quip of Bierce's anywhere in his Survey of Western Civilization, first published in 1947,

4
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:39.000
nor, as far as I can tell, does he ever quoted anywhere else in his many books.

5
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:47.000
But he certainly writes in his Survey of Western Civilization as though Bierce's definition of politics were one of his working assumptions.

6
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:55.880
For example, Barnes wrote as follows in 1947 of the events that took place between 1775 and 1790

7
00:00:55.880 --> 00:01:05.400
in England's North American colonies. The American Revolution of 1775 to 1783 was primarily a revolt

8
00:01:05.400 --> 00:01:11.160
and a triumph of the commercial classes, the powerful merchant classes, which did not at

9
00:01:11.160 --> 00:01:17.780
at first actually desire an open rebellion, but had hoped to intimidate England into ordering

10
00:01:17.780 --> 00:01:23.720
a discontinuance of the new and restrictive commercial policy that it had determined upon

11
00:01:23.720 --> 00:01:25.720
in 1763.

12
00:01:25.720 --> 00:01:31.160
Ultimately, the movement of protests the merchants had encouraged among the common people of

13
00:01:31.160 --> 00:01:38.480
the coast towns grew into overt revolution, which they found themselves obliged to support.

14
00:01:38.480 --> 00:01:43.800
Since the war for political independence had been won, however, and these are Barnes' words,

15
00:01:43.800 --> 00:01:49.200
the merchant class gave up most of their radical notions of the revolutionary period, that

16
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:55.680
is, their liberal ideals, and framed a relatively conservative constitution designed to advance

17
00:01:55.680 --> 00:01:58.320
the interests of the business classes.

18
00:01:58.320 --> 00:02:03.600
Their leader was Alexander Hamilton, perhaps the ablest economic statesman in the history

19
00:02:03.600 --> 00:02:05.800
of American capitalism.

20
00:02:05.800 --> 00:02:11.540
It is helpful to remember here that what Barnes means by capitalism in this passage is not

21
00:02:11.540 --> 00:02:12.540
the free market.

22
00:02:12.540 --> 00:02:18.220
Rather, he is using the term in its original sense, and in the sense intended by virtually

23
00:02:18.220 --> 00:02:23.300
all writers since Marx who have thought of themselves as members of the left.

24
00:02:23.300 --> 00:02:29.980
That is, by capitalism, Barnes means the use of the power of the state to advance the perceived

25
00:02:29.980 --> 00:02:35.680
interests of capitalists, the owners and deployers of capital.

26
00:02:35.680 --> 00:02:41.120
It is also useful, I think, to bear in mind the enormous intellectual debt Barnes owed

27
00:02:41.120 --> 00:02:47.160
to the distinguished American historian Charles Austin Beard, who tended to see conflicts

28
00:02:47.160 --> 00:02:51.480
of economic interest behind all political controversies.

29
00:02:51.480 --> 00:02:57.060
Or to put the matter in Ambrose Beard's terms, when Charles Beard looked at politics, he

30
00:02:57.060 --> 00:03:02.660
tended to see a strife of interests, masquerading as a contest of principles.

31
00:03:02.660 --> 00:03:08.620
He tended to see two or more parties seeking control of the state in order to conduct public

32
00:03:08.620 --> 00:03:11.540
affairs for private advantage.

33
00:03:11.540 --> 00:03:16.320
Barnes first fell under Charles Beard's influence when he was in graduate school at Columbia

34
00:03:16.320 --> 00:03:22.420
just before World War I, and he remained under Beard's influence for the rest of his life.

35
00:03:22.420 --> 00:03:29.960
When in 1947, at the age of 58, Barnes published his Survey of Western Civilization, he dedicated

36
00:03:29.960 --> 00:03:35.960
it to Charles Austin Beard, courageous historian and incorruptible patriot.

37
00:03:35.960 --> 00:03:41.520
And his portrayal of the American Revolution and its aftermath has obviously been influenced

38
00:03:41.520 --> 00:03:49.360
by Beard's famous 1913 book, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States.

39
00:03:49.360 --> 00:03:54.760
Barnes' understanding of the politics of 17th century England is, however, very similar

40
00:03:54.760 --> 00:04:01.040
to his understanding of the politics of Boston and Philadelphia late in the 18th century.

41
00:04:01.040 --> 00:04:06.520
Barnes seems to have agreed, basically, with H.G. Wells that occupants of the English throne

42
00:04:06.520 --> 00:04:12.440
had been trying, as Wells put it in 1920, to make the government of England a personal

43
00:04:12.440 --> 00:04:18.800
monarchy of the continental type since the time of the House of Tudor, Henry VII, Henry

44
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:25.200
Edward VI, Queen Mary and the original Queen Elizabeth in the 16th century.

45
00:04:25.200 --> 00:04:31.040
They had, all of these monarchs, favored what Barnes calls a policy of complete governmental

46
00:04:31.040 --> 00:04:37.660
regulation of economic activities, the policy known as mercantilism in England.

47
00:04:37.660 --> 00:04:43.080
Barnes notes that almost before mercantilism had taken definite shape as a policy, some

48
00:04:43.080 --> 00:04:46.080
objections to it began to be raised.

49
00:04:46.080 --> 00:04:51.840
For even in the very beginning, some of those engaged in trade found this regulation inimical

50
00:04:51.840 --> 00:04:57.780
to their interests, and the political importance of those engaged in trade grew steadily during

51
00:04:57.780 --> 00:05:00.880
the 16th and 17th centuries.

52
00:05:00.880 --> 00:05:06.640
As Barnes wrote in 1947, the oceans were conquered for the first time.

53
00:05:06.640 --> 00:05:11.780
Trade attained a volume, variety and geographic scope hitherto unknown.

54
00:05:11.780 --> 00:05:17.920
There was now far greater volume of trade than ever before, a greater total bulk of commodities

55
00:05:17.920 --> 00:05:23.280
traded and a greater variety and diversity of commodities exchanged.

56
00:05:23.280 --> 00:05:28.420
More goods were made at home for trade and more were brought in from foreign countries

57
00:05:28.420 --> 00:05:29.660
and climes.

58
00:05:29.660 --> 00:05:32.820
This meant the stimulation of manufacturing.

59
00:05:32.820 --> 00:05:38.220
And this in turn meant a remarkable increase in the numbers, wealth and power of the middle

60
00:05:38.220 --> 00:05:41.060
class or bourgeoisie.

61
00:05:41.060 --> 00:05:46.060
This growing middle class, made up mostly of merchants and small businessmen, along

62
00:05:46.060 --> 00:05:51.900
with lawyers and other professionals, soon found the rule of these autocrats, the Tudor

63
00:05:51.900 --> 00:05:54.900
monarchs, burdensome and restrictive.

64
00:05:54.900 --> 00:06:01.180
Increasingly they began agitating for political change, and, as Barnes pointed out, they agitated

65
00:06:01.180 --> 00:06:05.380
increasingly for political change of a particular sort.

66
00:06:05.380 --> 00:06:10.660
In the political realm, he wrote in his Survey of Western Civilization, the most important

67
00:06:10.660 --> 00:06:16.660
The second item in the program of the new commercial middle class was their drive for representative government.

68
00:06:16.660 --> 00:06:25.660
They soon lost their faith in their ability to protect their interests merely through unofficial negotiations and compromises with the monarchs.

69
00:06:25.660 --> 00:06:33.660
They felt that they must take an active part in government and, if possible, secure dominion over the kings.

70
00:06:33.660 --> 00:06:43.660
This could be done only through increasing the power of the legislative or elective branch of the government, which in England means Parliament.

71
00:06:43.660 --> 00:06:52.660
Still, as Barnes told the tale back in 1947, there were no active clashes between the Crown and Parliament in the age of Elizabeth,

72
00:06:52.660 --> 00:06:57.660
because her policies in the main were favourable to the rising commercial groups.

73
00:06:57.660 --> 00:07:08.660
When they openly challenged her policies in Parliament, she usually stalled for time and then graciously conceded their demands if it seemed strategic to do so.

74
00:07:08.660 --> 00:07:24.660
Elizabeth, the so-called Virgin Queen, left no heir, however, and the English throne passed to James VI, the King of Scotland, who in 1603 became James I, King of both England and Scotland.

75
00:07:24.660 --> 00:07:36.660
Harry Elmer Barnes put the matter succinctly. James I, he wrote, first of the Stuart Kings, was more presumptuous than Elizabeth, and more lacking in tact and discretion.

76
00:07:36.660 --> 00:07:47.660
James spent lavishly, and financed his spending by illegally imposing new taxes on the English public, illegally because without the approval of Parliament.

77
00:07:47.660 --> 00:07:55.660
Barnes wrote that these new taxes fell directly upon the merchants, increasing their financial burdens and reducing their profits.

78
00:07:55.660 --> 00:08:04.660
In addition, James interfered with the freedom of manufacturing and trade by arbitrarily establishing industrial and commercial monopolies.

79
00:08:04.660 --> 00:08:08.660
James' son, Charles I, was even worse than his father.

80
00:08:08.660 --> 00:08:16.660
Not only did Charles spend lavishly and impose new taxes without even bothering to seek the approval of Parliament,

81
00:08:16.660 --> 00:08:20.560
He also had his critics and political opponents arrested.

82
00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:25.220
He had them tried before special tribunals packed with his flunkies.

83
00:08:25.220 --> 00:08:30.340
He had them imprisoned, often for years at a time, for nothing more than expressing their

84
00:08:30.340 --> 00:08:31.940
political opinions.

85
00:08:31.940 --> 00:08:37.260
He flouted every effort by Parliament to restrain him or limit his power.

86
00:08:37.260 --> 00:08:44.780
Finally, in 1642, there began what Barnes described as a period of civil war that lasted

87
00:08:44.780 --> 00:08:51.020
with brief interludes until the execution of the king in 1649.

88
00:08:51.020 --> 00:08:56.480
Seven years of civil war were followed by nine more years with no king at all.

89
00:08:56.480 --> 00:09:04.360
As Barnes wrote in his Survey of Western Civilization, from 1649 to 1658 England was ruled by the

90
00:09:04.360 --> 00:09:10.060
Commonwealth government presided over by Oliver Cromwell, who had been the most successful

91
00:09:10.060 --> 00:09:13.500
military leader in the struggle against Charles.

92
00:09:13.500 --> 00:09:18.780
Mises maintains that most of the program of the middle class parliamentarians was put

93
00:09:18.780 --> 00:09:24.520
into operation by Cromwell, who governed with or without parliament in a manner that was

94
00:09:24.520 --> 00:09:28.200
generally favorable to the mercantile middle class.

95
00:09:28.200 --> 00:09:33.620
On the other hand, Cromwell's naval wars disturbed trade, and he imposed commercial

96
00:09:33.620 --> 00:09:35.620
restrictions of his own.

97
00:09:35.620 --> 00:09:42.060
So after Cromwell's death in 1658, the stewards were invited back, with the blessing of the

98
00:09:42.060 --> 00:09:44.640
by the mercantile middle class.

99
00:09:44.640 --> 00:09:50.620
According to Barnes, the first of these restored steward-monarchs, Charles I's son, Charles

100
00:09:50.620 --> 00:09:56.720
II, followed the general policy of Elizabeth in discreetly observing what the traffic would

101
00:09:56.720 --> 00:09:59.860
bear in the royal conflict with Parliament.

102
00:09:59.860 --> 00:10:04.360
He gave way whenever any open clash seemed probable.

103
00:10:04.360 --> 00:10:11.900
But Charles was succeeded in 1685 by his brother James II, who was far less politic than Charles

104
00:10:11.900 --> 00:10:30.980
Clearly, the arrogance of these kings knew no bounds.

105
00:10:30.980 --> 00:10:36.460
They were inclined to believe, as Murray Rothbard reminds us in his Austrian Perspective on the

106
00:10:36.460 --> 00:10:43.260
in the History of Economic Thought, that subjects must obey the king in any and all circumstances,

107
00:10:43.260 --> 00:10:47.500
whether or not the king or his actions were good or evil.

108
00:10:47.500 --> 00:10:52.020
There must be no resistance whatever, even to evil princes.

109
00:10:52.020 --> 00:10:58.360
The king is the divinely mandated representative of God on earth by hereditary right.

110
00:10:58.360 --> 00:11:05.180
To question, much less to disobey the king, therefore, was not only treason, but blasphemy.

111
00:11:05.180 --> 00:11:08.620
Disobeying the king was disobeying God.

112
00:11:08.620 --> 00:11:14.700
After all, as these monarchs saw it, once again quoting Rothbard, good kings are a blessing

113
00:11:14.700 --> 00:11:17.020
sent to the people by God.

114
00:11:17.020 --> 00:11:20.980
Wicked kings are a punishment equally sent by the divinity.

115
00:11:20.980 --> 00:11:27.060
In either case, the duty of the subject is absolute obedience to God's and the king's

116
00:11:27.060 --> 00:11:28.060
commands.

117
00:11:28.060 --> 00:11:33.380
According to Rothbard, at times, the kings and their supporters came close to saying

118
00:11:33.380 --> 00:11:36.540
that a monarch could never harm his people.

119
00:11:36.540 --> 00:11:42.700
In other words, however evil his deeds may seem, they must really be good, virtually

120
00:11:42.700 --> 00:11:45.060
by definition.

121
00:11:45.060 --> 00:11:50.260
Despite recent memory of the conduct in office of Cromwell and his minions, the conduct of

122
00:11:50.260 --> 00:11:56.340
the newly restored Stuart monarchs, according to Harry Elmer Barnes, provoked another rebellion

123
00:11:56.340 --> 00:12:03.360
of the middle class, and this rebellion culminated in the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688

124
00:12:03.360 --> 00:12:11.280
1689. Barnes wrote that James' supporters were too few and weak to carry on another civil war,

125
00:12:11.280 --> 00:12:17.760
so James II was driven out without serious bloodshed, and James' Protestant daughter, Mary,

126
00:12:17.760 --> 00:12:22.640
and her Dutch husband, William of Orange, were summoned to take over the British throne.

127
00:12:23.520 --> 00:12:29.200
And how did the middle class justify this high-handed treatment of the divinely mandated

128
00:12:29.200 --> 00:12:31.940
Representative of God on Earth?

129
00:12:31.940 --> 00:12:35.140
Harry Elmer Barnes wrote in 1947 that

130
00:12:35.140 --> 00:12:41.400
the middle class produced a body of economic and political theory to justify its attitudes

131
00:12:41.400 --> 00:12:42.880
and program.

132
00:12:42.880 --> 00:12:48.560
In the realm of economic policy, it gradually came to favor complete withdrawal of the state

133
00:12:48.560 --> 00:12:52.360
from all types of interference with economic life.

134
00:12:52.360 --> 00:12:57.480
In the field of political theory, it developed a related type of interpretation.

135
00:12:57.480 --> 00:13:03.400
What it desired above all was freedom from arbitrary taxation and other forms of oppression.

136
00:13:03.400 --> 00:13:10.580
Hence, it worked out a doctrine of the natural rights of man to life, liberty and property.

137
00:13:10.580 --> 00:13:16.180
This theory of natural rights was closely allied to the notion of a natural order that

138
00:13:16.180 --> 00:13:20.920
lay at the foundation of the economic philosophy of laissez-faire.

139
00:13:20.920 --> 00:13:26.840
These natural rights of life, liberty and property, which included, specifically, freedom

140
00:13:26.840 --> 00:13:34.240
from arbitrary confiscation of property, imprisonment, illegal taxation and censorship, were held

141
00:13:34.240 --> 00:13:39.400
by middle-class writers to be inherent in the order of nature from the beginnings of

142
00:13:39.400 --> 00:13:41.200
human society.

143
00:13:41.200 --> 00:13:47.640
The state or civil authority was established not to limit or terminate these supposed inherent

144
00:13:47.640 --> 00:13:53.400
natural rights, but rather still more firmly to assure and protect them.

145
00:13:53.400 --> 00:13:58.940
No ruler had any real authority to infringe upon these natural rights.

146
00:13:58.940 --> 00:14:04.780
As Barnes noted, there were a number of middle-class writers who took more or less this line, but

147
00:14:04.780 --> 00:14:11.340
by far the most influential of them was the 17th-century English philosopher John Locke.

148
00:14:11.340 --> 00:14:17.120
Many of his theories were taken up and popularized in America by Thomas Jefferson.

149
00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:22.580
Which brings us to the question Barnes' account of political developments in 17th-century

150
00:14:22.580 --> 00:14:28.500
Theory England poses for us, for it seems clear that the theory Barnes depicts as having

151
00:14:28.500 --> 00:14:35.340
been developed to justify the economic and political program of the middle class is none

152
00:14:35.340 --> 00:14:39.900
other than what we call today by the name libertarianism.

153
00:14:39.900 --> 00:14:46.120
And John Locke is, of course, one of the major heroes of the libertarian intellectual pantheon.

154
00:14:46.120 --> 00:14:49.520
But should we regard Locke in this way?

155
00:14:49.520 --> 00:14:55.000
Was he one of the pioneers in the effort to discover and work out the implications of libertarian

156
00:14:55.000 --> 00:15:01.760
principle, or was he merely a clever propagandist, a composer of justifications for political

157
00:15:01.760 --> 00:15:07.460
policies actually designed to benefit the middle class economically?

158
00:15:07.460 --> 00:15:10.880
I'll have more to say on this subject next week.

159
00:15:10.880 --> 00:15:11.880
This is Jeff Rigenbach.

160
00:15:19.520 --> 00:15:27.520
www.fieggen.com