WEBVTT

NOTE William Graham Sumner (1840–1910)

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.480
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with

2
00:00:09.480 --> 00:00:12.760
Jeff Rigenbach.

3
00:00:12.760 --> 00:00:20.840
It was 101 years ago this week, on April 12, 1910, that William Graham Sumner died.

4
00:00:20.840 --> 00:00:28.040
He had been born nearly 70 years earlier, on October 30, 1840, almost 30 years to the

5
00:00:28.040 --> 00:00:38.040
The day before the birth of another American libertarian, Albert J. Nock, whose career bears a striking, if superficial, similarity to Sumner's.

6
00:00:38.040 --> 00:00:44.040
Like Sumner, Nock began his career while still in his twenties as an Episcopal clergyman.

7
00:00:44.040 --> 00:00:52.040
Like Nock, Sumner went into such work largely to please his family, but the job was a poor fit for both men.

8
00:00:52.040 --> 00:00:55.040
Nock walked away from it after little more than a decade.

9
00:00:55.040 --> 00:01:01.360
Decade. Sumner didn't make it even five years. Both men moved on directly from religious

10
00:01:01.360 --> 00:01:07.360
employment to the work for which they came to be best known. Nock, at the age of 40,

11
00:01:07.360 --> 00:01:13.840
moved on to the magazine journalism for which he became famous in the 1920s and 30s. Sumner,

12
00:01:13.840 --> 00:01:19.280
while still in his early 30s, moved on to the position as professor of political economy

13
00:01:19.280 --> 00:01:23.680
at Yale, which he held for the rest of his life.

14
00:01:23.680 --> 00:01:30.240
Today neither Nock nor Sumner is particularly well known, and those who do know of Sumner,

15
00:01:30.240 --> 00:01:36.000
those who don't confuse him with Charles Sumner, the abolitionist senator from Massachusetts,

16
00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:39.240
probably know him as a social Darwinist.

17
00:01:39.240 --> 00:01:45.840
And this is ironic, for he was not so known during his lifetime or for many years thereafter.

18
00:01:45.840 --> 00:01:51.720
Robert C. Bannister, the Swarthmore historian, edited a valuable collection of Sumner's

19
00:01:51.720 --> 00:01:55.200
essays nearly two decades ago for Liberty Fund.

20
00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:59.920
This is how he describes the situation in his forward to that volume.

21
00:01:59.920 --> 00:02:07.040
Sumner's Social Darwinism, he writes, although rooted in controversies during his lifetime,

22
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:12.240
received its most influential expression in Richard Hofstadter's Social Darwinism in

23
00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:17.520
and American Thought, which was first published in 1944.

24
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:23.420
In fact, there is considerable evidence that the entire concept of social Darwinism was

25
00:02:23.420 --> 00:02:26.760
virtually invented by Richard Hofstadter.

26
00:02:26.760 --> 00:02:32.000
Eric Foner, in an introduction to a then-new edition of Hofstadter's book published in

27
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:36.560
the early 1990s, declines to go quite that far.

28
00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:42.360
Hofstadter did not invent the term Social Darwinism, Foner writes, which originated

29
00:02:42.360 --> 00:02:49.000
in Europe in the 1860s and crossed the Atlantic in the early 20th century, but before he wrote

30
00:02:49.000 --> 00:02:52.280
it was used only on rare occasions.

31
00:02:52.280 --> 00:02:59.200
He made it a standard shorthand for a complex of late 19th century ideas, a familiar part

32
00:02:59.200 --> 00:03:02.000
of the lexicon of social thought.

33
00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:07.920
In the process, he not only portrayed William Graham Sumner as a social Darwinist, he also

34
00:03:07.920 --> 00:03:10.760
portrayed Herbert Spencer that way.

35
00:03:10.760 --> 00:03:15.800
In fact, Richard Hofstadter seems to be the principal source of the widespread modern

36
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:20.440
belief that both these men were social Darwinists.

37
00:03:20.440 --> 00:03:22.000
But were they?

38
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:29.240
What precisely is this complex of late 19th century ideas, as Eric Foner puts it, that

39
00:03:29.240 --> 00:03:33.240
Social Darwinism is supposed to stand for.

40
00:03:33.240 --> 00:03:38.240
Perhaps the most frustrating thing about doing a little general reading in this field

41
00:03:38.240 --> 00:03:43.240
is discovering how difficult it is to find any sort of definition of that phrase,

42
00:03:43.240 --> 00:03:50.240
Social Darwinism, especially if one is hoping to find a succinct and quotable definition of it.

43
00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:56.240
Entire books are written on the subject without ever carefully and clearly delimiting

44
00:03:56.240 --> 00:04:24.240
In essence, however, social Darwinism seems to be the notion that success in the market proves an individual's fitness to survive in the struggle for existence, so that both legislation and private charity meant to assist those who fail in the market is inadvisable, since our species will grow stronger if these unfit individuals are allowed to die off.

45
00:04:24.240 --> 00:04:30.160
Did anyone ever espouse this doctrine? Herbert Spencer certainly didn't.

46
00:04:30.160 --> 00:04:39.360
Spencer, who was born 191 years ago this month on April 27, 1820, was an enthusiastic exponent of

47
00:04:39.360 --> 00:04:45.440
evolution, true enough. In fact, he wrote about evolution before Darwin did. In fact,

48
00:04:45.440 --> 00:04:51.520
it was Herbert Spencer, not Charles Darwin, who coined the phrase, survival of the fittest.

49
00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:57.360
But Spencer was no sort of Darwinian at all. Even after Darwin began publishing,

50
00:04:57.360 --> 00:05:03.360
Spencer remained a Lamarckian, a disciple of an earlier advocate of evolution who believed

51
00:05:03.360 --> 00:05:09.920
organisms could pass on acquired characteristics to their offspring. In the case of humans,

52
00:05:09.920 --> 00:05:14.640
Spencer's view was that culture and education make this process possible.

53
00:05:14.640 --> 00:05:20.400
Also, Spencer was a proponent of private charity.

54
00:05:20.400 --> 00:05:24.160
Was William Graham Sumner an advocate of social Darwinism?

55
00:05:24.160 --> 00:05:30.080
As I have indicated, he has been so described, most notably by Richard Hofstadter and various

56
00:05:30.080 --> 00:05:33.160
others over the past 60-odd years.

57
00:05:33.160 --> 00:05:38.480
Robert Bannister calls this description more caricature than accurate characterization

58
00:05:38.480 --> 00:05:44.000
of Sumner, however, and says further that it seriously misrepresents him.

59
00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:49.280
He notes that Sumner's short book What Social Classes Owe to Each Other, which was first

60
00:05:49.280 --> 00:05:55.940
published in 1884 when the author was in his early 40s, would earn him a reputation as

61
00:05:55.940 --> 00:06:01.620
the Gilded Age's leading social Darwinist, though it invoked neither the names nor the

62
00:06:01.620 --> 00:06:05.040
rhetoric of Spencer or Darwin.

63
00:06:05.040 --> 00:06:10.200
It is interesting, in fact, to take a look into its pages and see what it is exactly

64
00:06:10.200 --> 00:06:28.920
One of those concerns was the history of human civilization, particularly its political component.

65
00:06:28.920 --> 00:06:35.040
The history of the human race, Sumner wrote, is one long story of attempts by certain persons

66
00:06:35.040 --> 00:06:42.040
and Classes to obtain control of the power of the state, so as to win earthly gratifications

67
00:06:42.040 --> 00:06:44.140
at the expense of others.

68
00:06:44.140 --> 00:06:50.200
All this began, according to Sumner, in ancient times, when organized bands of robbers plundered

69
00:06:50.200 --> 00:06:56.340
laborers and merchants, until eventually they found that means of robbery which consisted

70
00:06:56.340 --> 00:07:03.140
in gaining control of the civil organization, the state, and using its poetry and romance

71
00:07:03.140 --> 00:07:14.660
by the Civil Organization here, Sumner seems to mean whatever local or tribal organization

72
00:07:14.660 --> 00:07:21.260
provided the bundle of services, community defense, adjudication of disputes, identification

73
00:07:21.260 --> 00:07:27.180
and apprehension of wrongdoers, that Albert J. Nock called government.

74
00:07:27.180 --> 00:07:32.900
The bands of robbers took over the local government and transformed it into a state.

75
00:07:32.900 --> 00:07:39.020
And of course, they developed high-spun theories of nationality, patriotism and loyalty to

76
00:07:39.020 --> 00:07:43.700
justify these nefarious deeds in the minds of their victims.

77
00:07:43.700 --> 00:07:50.980
Since then, Sumner wrote, human history has been only a tiresome repetition of one story.

78
00:07:50.980 --> 00:07:56.100
Persons and classes have sought to win possession of the power of the state in order to live

79
00:07:56.100 --> 00:07:59.420
luxuriously out of the earnings of others.

80
00:07:59.420 --> 00:08:06.540
The fashion of the time, Sumner is referring here to the 1880s, is to run to government boards,

81
00:08:06.540 --> 00:08:13.980
commissions and inspectors to set right everything which is wrong. No experience seems to damp the

82
00:08:13.980 --> 00:08:19.900
faith of our public in these instrumentalities. The English liberals in the middle of this century

83
00:08:19.900 --> 00:08:25.420
seem to have full grasp of the principle of liberty and to be fixed and established in

84
00:08:25.420 --> 00:08:50.140
In this country, the party which is in, always interferes, and the party which is out, favors

85
00:08:50.140 --> 00:08:52.140
non-interference.

86
00:08:52.140 --> 00:08:57.560
I found it startling after reading that passage to be reminded that Sumner was writing here

87
00:08:57.560 --> 00:09:05.280
about the Republican and Democratic parties as they were 130 years ago.

88
00:09:05.280 --> 00:09:10.900
Little wonder that, as Robert Bannister tells us, Sumner had experienced disillusionment

89
00:09:10.900 --> 00:09:19.620
with politics as early as 1877 and had repudiated politics as a waste of time by 1880, declining

90
00:09:19.620 --> 00:09:29.760
There were, Sumner said, only two notions to choose from in making political decisions.

91
00:09:29.760 --> 00:09:35.340
One was the notion that the state should regulate things by a committee of control, and the

92
00:09:35.340 --> 00:09:41.920
other to let things regulate themselves by the conflict of interests between free men.

93
00:09:41.920 --> 00:09:47.740
These two notions, he said, are diametrically opposed, and the former is corrupting to free

94
00:09:47.740 --> 00:10:03.740
The bottom line, according to Sumner, was that if we have been all wrong for the last

95
00:10:03.740 --> 00:10:10.240
300 years in aiming at a fuller realization of individual liberty as a condition of general

96
00:10:10.240 --> 00:10:17.220
and widely diffused happiness, then we must turn back to paternalism, discipline and authority.

97
00:10:17.220 --> 00:10:22.440
But to have a combination of liberty and dependence is impossible.

98
00:10:22.440 --> 00:10:27.340
In fact, of course, Sumner didn't believe for a moment that we have been all wrong for

99
00:10:27.340 --> 00:10:29.620
the last 300 years.

100
00:10:29.620 --> 00:10:35.580
He believed that in a free society it is not the state that holds people together.

101
00:10:35.580 --> 00:10:43.420
Rather, the ties by which all are held together are those of free cooperation and contract.

102
00:10:43.420 --> 00:10:48.900
If we look back for comparison to anything of which human history gives us a type or

103
00:10:48.900 --> 00:10:55.660
experiment, we see that the modern free system of industry offers to every living human being

104
00:10:55.660 --> 00:11:02.540
chances of happiness indescribably in excess of what former generations have possessed.

105
00:11:02.540 --> 00:11:08.500
It offers no such guarantees as were once possessed by some that they should in no case

106
00:11:08.500 --> 00:11:09.860
suffer.

107
00:11:09.860 --> 00:11:12.040
We have an instance right at hand.

108
00:11:12.040 --> 00:11:19.420
The Negroes, once slaves in the United States, used to be assured care, medicine, and support.

109
00:11:19.420 --> 00:11:23.700
But they spent their efforts, and other men took the products.

110
00:11:23.700 --> 00:11:25.900
They have been set free.

111
00:11:25.900 --> 00:11:28.060
That means only just this.

112
00:11:28.060 --> 00:11:35.260
They now work and hold their own products, and are assured of nothing but what they earn.

113
00:11:35.260 --> 00:11:39.060
In escaping from subjection, they have lost claims.

114
00:11:39.060 --> 00:11:44.300
Care, medicine and support they get if they earn it.

115
00:11:44.300 --> 00:11:47.780
Will anyone say that the black men have not gained?

116
00:11:47.780 --> 00:11:52.620
Will anyone deny that individual black men may seem worse off?

117
00:11:52.620 --> 00:11:58.700
Will anyone allow such observations to blind them to the true significance of the change?

118
00:11:58.700 --> 00:12:05.240
If anyone thinks that there are or ought to be somewhere in society guarantees that no

119
00:12:05.240 --> 00:12:29.040
Sumner believed that if the question at hand was what social classes owe to each other,

120
00:12:29.040 --> 00:12:36.360
We should find the correct answer by focusing not on social classes at all, but on individuals.

121
00:12:36.360 --> 00:12:43.240
Every man and woman in society, he wrote, has one big duty, that is, to take care of

122
00:12:43.240 --> 00:12:46.000
his or her own self.

123
00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:51.960
This is a social duty, for fortunately the matter stands so that the duty of making the

124
00:12:51.960 --> 00:12:58.680
best of oneself individually is not a separate thing from the duty of filling one's place

125
00:12:58.680 --> 00:13:05.420
in Society, but the two are one, and the latter is accomplished when the former is done.

126
00:13:05.420 --> 00:13:11.840
The common notion, however, seems to be that one has a duty to society as a special and

127
00:13:11.840 --> 00:13:18.700
separate thing, and that this duty consists in considering and deciding what other people

128
00:13:18.700 --> 00:13:20.280
ought to do.

129
00:13:20.280 --> 00:13:26.380
Now the man who can do anything for or about anybody else than himself is fit to be head

130
00:13:26.380 --> 00:13:31.820
of a Family, and when he becomes head of a family, he has duties to his wife and his

131
00:13:31.820 --> 00:13:35.500
children in addition to the former big duty.

132
00:13:35.500 --> 00:13:42.460
Then again, any man who can take care of himself and his family is in a very exceptional position

133
00:13:42.460 --> 00:13:48.940
if he does not find in his immediate surroundings people who need his care and have some sort

134
00:13:48.940 --> 00:13:51.620
of a personal claim upon him.

135
00:13:51.620 --> 00:13:58.460
If now he is able to fulfill all this, and to take care of anybody outside his family

136
00:13:58.460 --> 00:14:05.180
and his dependents, he must have a surplus of energy, wisdom and moral virtue beyond

137
00:14:05.180 --> 00:14:07.860
what he needs for his own business.

138
00:14:07.860 --> 00:14:14.660
No man has this, for a family is a charge which is capable of infinite development,

139
00:14:14.660 --> 00:14:21.300
and no man could suffice to the full measure of duty for which a family may draw upon him.

140
00:14:21.300 --> 00:14:27.400
Neither can a man give to society so advantageous an employment of his services, whatever they

141
00:14:27.400 --> 00:14:32.620
are, in any other way as by spending them on his family.

142
00:14:32.620 --> 00:14:35.060
Upon this, however, I will not insist.

143
00:14:35.060 --> 00:14:41.120
I recur to the observation that a man who proposes to take care of other people must

144
00:14:41.120 --> 00:14:47.080
have himself and his family taken care of after some sort of a fashion, and must have

145
00:14:47.080 --> 00:14:51.060
an as yet unexhausted store of energy.

146
00:14:51.060 --> 00:14:56.460
Such energetic do-gooders would do well to attend to the potential downside of what they

147
00:14:56.460 --> 00:15:02.860
are undertaking, however, for, as Sumner put it, the danger of minding other people's business

148
00:15:02.860 --> 00:15:03.860
is two-fold.

149
00:15:03.860 --> 00:15:09.540
First, there is the danger that a man may leave his own business unattended to.

150
00:15:09.540 --> 00:15:15.040
And second, there is the danger of an impertinent interference with another's affairs.

151
00:15:15.040 --> 00:15:19.540
The friends of humanity almost always run into both dangers.

152
00:15:19.540 --> 00:15:24.740
I am one of humanity, and I do not want any volunteer friends.

153
00:15:24.740 --> 00:15:29.420
I regard friendship as mutual, and I want to have my say about it.

154
00:15:29.420 --> 00:15:34.180
I suppose that other components of humanity feel in the same way about it.

155
00:15:34.180 --> 00:15:41.860
If so, they must regard anyone who assumes the role of a friend of humanity as impertinent.

156
00:15:41.860 --> 00:15:47.100
The reference to the friend of humanity back to his own business is obviously the next

157
00:15:47.100 --> 00:15:48.340
step.

158
00:15:48.340 --> 00:15:55.060
Yet we are constantly annoyed, and the legislatures are kept constantly busy by the people who

159
00:15:55.060 --> 00:16:00.500
have made up their minds that it is wise and conducive to happiness to live in a certain

160
00:16:00.500 --> 00:16:06.300
way, and who want to compel everybody else to live in their way.

161
00:16:06.300 --> 00:16:11.700
Some people have decided to spend Sunday in a certain way, and they want laws passed to

162
00:16:11.700 --> 00:16:15.540
make other people spend Sunday in the same way.

163
00:16:15.540 --> 00:16:20.780
Some people have resolved to be teetotallers, and they want a law passed to make everybody

164
00:16:20.780 --> 00:16:22.960
else a teetotaller.

165
00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:28.900
Some people have resolved to eschew luxury, and they want taxes laid to make others eschew

166
00:16:28.900 --> 00:16:30.220
luxury.

167
00:16:30.220 --> 00:16:36.300
The taxing power is especially something after which the reformer's finger always itches.

168
00:16:36.300 --> 00:16:41.640
Sometimes there is an element of self-interest in the proposed reformation, as when a publisher

169
00:16:41.640 --> 00:16:47.420
Sumner wanted a duty imposed on books to keep Americans from reading books which would

170
00:16:47.420 --> 00:16:54.360
unsettle their Americanisms, and when artists wanted a tax laid on pictures to save Americans

171
00:16:54.360 --> 00:16:57.080
from buying bad paintings.

172
00:16:57.080 --> 00:17:03.540
There was one other duty Sumner believed the individuals in society owed to each other,

173
00:17:03.540 --> 00:17:07.960
and it was rather an odd one for a social Darwinist like him.

174
00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:12.240
He Thought People Ode Each Other Compassion and Assistance

175
00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:18.200
We may philosophize as coolly and correctly as we choose about our duties and about the

176
00:17:18.200 --> 00:17:21.080
laws of right living, Sumner wrote.

177
00:17:21.080 --> 00:17:24.260
No one of us lives up to what he knows.

178
00:17:24.260 --> 00:17:28.740
The man struck by the falling tree has perhaps been careless.

179
00:17:28.740 --> 00:17:30.880
We are all careless.

180
00:17:30.880 --> 00:17:37.800
Enviorned as we are by risks and perils which befall us as misfortunes, no man of us is

181
00:17:37.800 --> 00:17:43.480
is in a position to say, I know all the laws and am sure to obey them all, therefore I

182
00:17:43.480 --> 00:17:46.600
shall never need aid and sympathy.

183
00:17:46.600 --> 00:17:52.520
At the very best, one of us fails in one way and another in another, if we do not fail

184
00:17:52.520 --> 00:17:53.520
altogether.

185
00:17:53.520 --> 00:17:59.680
Therefore, the man under the tree is the one of us who, for the moment, is smitten.

186
00:17:59.680 --> 00:18:03.680
It may be you tomorrow, and I next day.

187
00:18:03.680 --> 00:18:09.760
It is the common frailty in the midst of a common peril which gives us a kind of solidarity

188
00:18:09.760 --> 00:18:15.600
of interest to rescue the one for whom the chances of life have turned out badly just

189
00:18:15.600 --> 00:18:17.080
now.

190
00:18:17.080 --> 00:18:19.240
Probably the victim is to blame.

191
00:18:19.240 --> 00:18:21.600
He almost always is so.

192
00:18:21.600 --> 00:18:26.740
A lecture to that effect in the crisis of his peril would be out of place because it

193
00:18:26.740 --> 00:18:28.960
would not fit the need of the moment.

194
00:18:28.960 --> 00:18:34.240
But it would be very much in place at another time, when the need was to avert the repetition

195
00:18:34.240 --> 00:18:37.360
of such an accident to somebody else.

196
00:18:37.360 --> 00:18:44.680
Men therefore owe to men in the chances and perils of this life, aid and sympathy on account

197
00:18:44.680 --> 00:18:49.840
of the common participation in human frailty and folly.

198
00:18:49.840 --> 00:18:55.420
Sumner cautioned his readers that he believed the duty to provide aid and sympathy to others

199
00:18:55.420 --> 00:19:01.580
belongs in the field of private and personal relations under the regulation of reason and

200
00:19:01.580 --> 00:19:08.300
conscience. He didn't believe the existence of this duty justified any sort of state guarantees

201
00:19:08.300 --> 00:19:14.380
against hardship. What social classes owe to each other contains much more of interest to

202
00:19:14.380 --> 00:19:20.620
modern libertarians, including one of the best simple popular discussions you'll find before the

203
00:19:20.620 --> 00:19:25.540
of the 1940s of the importance of capital to civilization.

204
00:19:25.540 --> 00:19:30.420
It's a treasure of the libertarian tradition, and I recommend it wholeheartedly.

205
00:19:30.420 --> 00:19:35.340
Perhaps Richard Hofstadter should have read it before he called William Graham Sumner

206
00:19:35.340 --> 00:19:37.460
a social Darwinist.

207
00:19:37.460 --> 00:19:38.460
This is Jeff Riggenbach.

208
00:19:50.620 --> 00:19:52.620
www.fieggen.com