WEBVTT

NOTE Yevgeny Zamyatin: Libertarian Novelist

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.400
The Ludwig von Mises Institute presents The Libertarian Tradition, an audio series with

2
00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:13.280
Jeff Brigenbach.

3
00:00:13.280 --> 00:00:18.860
When we think of the libertarian tradition, we tend naturally to think of political philosophers

4
00:00:18.860 --> 00:00:21.420
and economists of the past.

5
00:00:21.420 --> 00:00:28.280
But surely one part of the libertarian tradition belongs to novelists and other fiction writers.

6
00:00:28.280 --> 00:00:33.520
In earlier podcasts in this series, I've already discussed two such figures.

7
00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:41.360
Ayn Rand, whose 1957 novel Atlas Shrugged is arguably one of the half-dozen most important

8
00:00:41.360 --> 00:00:49.000
libertarian works of the 20th century, and John Ronald Ruhl Tolkien, the professor of

9
00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:55.260
philology at Oxford whose giant fantasy novel The Lord of the Rings, published just a few

10
00:00:55.260 --> 00:01:14.260
This week I'd like to talk about a writer whose level of influence has been much more modest, but whose indirect influence has nevertheless been considerable.

11
00:01:14.260 --> 00:01:19.260
Regular listeners to this series know what I mean by indirect influence.

12
00:01:19.260 --> 00:01:26.060
I gave an example of it just recently, when I discussed the life and career of Isabel Patterson.

13
00:01:26.060 --> 00:01:32.360
Patterson's libertarian classic, The God of the Machine, has never reached a wide readership.

14
00:01:32.360 --> 00:01:39.860
But, thanks to the effort of her protégé, Ayn Rand, Patterson herself has influenced millions of readers

15
00:01:39.860 --> 00:01:44.660
who have never even seen a copy of The God of the Machine.

16
00:01:44.660 --> 00:01:50.580
The writer I'm talking about today wrote a novel in which a citizen of a totalitarian

17
00:01:50.580 --> 00:01:55.560
state of the future meets a woman and becomes obsessed with her.

18
00:01:55.560 --> 00:02:01.080
He begins a forbidden sexual affair with this woman, meeting with her illicitly in a very

19
00:02:01.080 --> 00:02:06.820
old part of the city where the intrusive gaze of the all-encompassing government doesn't

20
00:02:06.820 --> 00:02:09.100
seem to penetrate.

21
00:02:09.100 --> 00:02:14.700
Through his relationship with her, he becomes involved in the organized underground opposition

22
00:02:14.700 --> 00:02:20.820
to the all-encompassing government, an opposition he had never previously realized existed at

23
00:02:20.820 --> 00:02:21.820
all.

24
00:02:21.820 --> 00:02:27.100
Ultimately, he and the woman are caught, imprisoned and tortured.

25
00:02:27.100 --> 00:02:33.680
In the end, he is sincerely repentant of his crimes, and is completely devoted to the all-encompassing

26
00:02:33.680 --> 00:02:37.820
government that has done him all this harm.

27
00:02:37.820 --> 00:02:44.240
A familiar story, no? Can you tell me what novel I've just described? Ah, I see a hand

28
00:02:44.240 --> 00:02:52.640
in the back of the room. Yes? George Orwell's 1984, you cry out, confidently. And your answer

29
00:02:52.640 --> 00:02:58.860
is correct, but only as far as it goes, which is, perhaps, not quite as far as you thought

30
00:02:58.860 --> 00:03:05.940
it would. That is a description of the plot of 1984, which was published, as we all know,

31
00:03:05.940 --> 00:03:08.240
in 1949.

32
00:03:08.240 --> 00:03:16.340
But Orwell adapted the plot of 1984 from another novel, one originally published 25 years earlier,

33
00:03:16.340 --> 00:03:18.660
in 1924.

34
00:03:18.660 --> 00:03:23.020
That earlier novel was entitled simply, We.

35
00:03:23.020 --> 00:03:28.540
It was the work of a not very well known Russian writer, Evgeny Zamyatin.

36
00:03:28.540 --> 00:03:34.340
Zamyatin was not very well known outside Russia when We was first published, and he was still

37
00:03:34.340 --> 00:03:41.300
Still Not Very Well Known in the West, 25 Years Later, When Orwell Published 1984.

38
00:03:41.300 --> 00:03:45.940
He Remains Not Very Well Known in the West, to this day.

39
00:03:45.940 --> 00:03:53.100
1984, by contrast, is extremely well known in the West today, particularly in England

40
00:03:53.100 --> 00:03:59.820
and the United States, where words and phrases like, News Speak, Double Think, Thought Crime

41
00:03:59.820 --> 00:04:05.660
and Big Brother is Watching You are familiar to millions who have never read the novel from which

42
00:04:05.660 --> 00:04:12.780
they come. And there is no getting around the similarities between 1984 and Zamyatin's We.

43
00:04:13.820 --> 00:04:20.220
The leader of the totalitarian state is called the benefactor instead of Big Brother, but the basic

44
00:04:20.220 --> 00:04:26.860
events of the story are fundamentally the same. And we know that George Orwell did read We several

45
00:04:26.860 --> 00:04:34.020
Several years before he wrote 1984, as Natasha Randall, the translator of the current modern

46
00:04:34.020 --> 00:04:39.860
library edition of Zamiattin's novel, told an interviewer for New York City public radio

47
00:04:39.860 --> 00:04:47.860
station WNYC in 2006, Orwell made no secret of his admiration for We.

48
00:04:47.860 --> 00:04:54.100
Orwell certainly read it, actually he read it I think in the early 40s, so about eight

49
00:04:54.100 --> 00:05:23.760
Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, first published in

50
00:05:23.760 --> 00:05:53.760
1932 is extremely similar to we in a number of ways. Here's one. The world state in brave new world is a technocratic one, dedicated to industrial efficiency and mass production. In the words of one critic, the world state is built upon the principles of Henry Ford's assembly line, mass production, homogeneity, predictability, and consumption of disposable consumer goods.

51
00:05:53.760 --> 00:06:10.760
At the same time as the World State lacks any supernatural-based religions, Ford himself is revered as a deity, and characters celebrate Ford Day and swear oaths by his name, for example, by Ford.

52
00:06:10.760 --> 00:06:27.760
The world state calendar numbers years in the A.F. era, after Ford, with year 1 A.F. being equivalent to 1908 A.D., the year in which Ford's first Model T rolled off his assembly line.

53
00:06:27.760 --> 00:06:37.760
In Zamiattin's We, industrial efficiency and mass production are the bywords of life in the technocratic One State.

54
00:06:37.760 --> 00:07:05.300
The narrator and main character of Zamiattin's story, the engineer D-503, tells us that unquestionably the greatest genius of the ancients was Frederick Winslow Taylor, the original factory and office efficiency expert who invented time and motion studies and took pride in increasing the output of any workplace through what he called scientific management.

55
00:07:05.300 --> 00:07:20.300
Taylor's only fault, according to D-503, was that his thought did not reach far enough to extend his method to all of life, to every step, to the 24 hours of every day.

56
00:07:20.300 --> 00:07:28.300
Another example. In Huxley's world state, sex is freely available, and is in fact encouraged.

57
00:07:28.300 --> 00:07:34.300
But it is far from the monogamous sex we still regard as the norm in our own society.

58
00:07:34.300 --> 00:07:40.660
A popular slogan in the world state is, everyone belongs to everyone else.

59
00:07:40.660 --> 00:07:43.020
This is repeated incessantly.

60
00:07:43.020 --> 00:07:49.000
The formation of families is discouraged, marriage is regarded as antisocial, and, as

61
00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:55.720
one perceptive critic of Brave New World describes it, both sexual competition and emotional

62
00:07:55.720 --> 00:08:00.240
romantic relationships are obsolete.

63
00:08:00.240 --> 00:08:06.280
In The One State of Zamiattin's We, first described in print eight years before Brave

64
00:08:06.280 --> 00:08:10.200
New World, things are remarkably similar.

65
00:08:10.200 --> 00:08:12.380
Everyone belongs to everyone else.

66
00:08:12.380 --> 00:08:17.000
If you want to have sex with someone, all you have to do is register for that person

67
00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:22.800
with The One State, and that person will show up at your room at a pre-arranged time with

68
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:28.040
a pink ticket for you to tear in half before you get down to business.

69
00:08:28.040 --> 00:08:33.000
You'll have 30 minutes to take care of business and you'll find that any kind of privacy is

70
00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:35.440
in pretty short supply.

71
00:08:35.440 --> 00:08:41.240
This is how translator Natasha Randall described the physical appearance of the one state in

72
00:08:41.240 --> 00:08:45.640
that 2006 WNYC interview.

73
00:08:45.640 --> 00:08:55.640
The world he creates in we is very clean and very blue and it's an urban state where essentially

74
00:08:55.640 --> 00:09:09.640
All of mankind has been driven inside of one great big green wall, and all of nature is banished to the outside of those walls, so you won't find a flower or an animal within this green wall.

75
00:09:09.640 --> 00:09:22.640
And all the buildings in the one state, which is this urban state, are transparent, so one of the nicest lines in the book describes looking up at these transparent buildings

76
00:09:22.640 --> 00:09:39.300
As D-503 puts it, we live in full view, perpetually awash with light, in among our transparent

77
00:09:39.300 --> 00:09:42.480
walls woven from the sparkling air.

78
00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:45.540
We have nothing to hide from one another.

79
00:09:45.540 --> 00:09:51.880
Even the citizens of the one state, however, do feel the need for a little privacy on occasion.

80
00:09:51.880 --> 00:09:55.440
As Natasha Randall notes in Zamyatin's novel,

81
00:09:55.440 --> 00:10:00.880
There are actually times when individuals are allowed to lower blinds in their room,

82
00:10:00.880 --> 00:10:05.880
and that's when someone arrives with a pink ticket.

83
00:10:05.880 --> 00:10:12.880
So we know Orwell read and admired We before he wrote 1984, and we don't know for sure

84
00:10:12.880 --> 00:10:18.400
whether Huxley read it before writing Brave New World, but it seems likely.

85
00:10:18.400 --> 00:10:24.100
We also don't know for sure whether Ayn Rand read Zamyatin's novel before writing her own

86
00:10:24.100 --> 00:10:31.560
story of totalitarianism in the far future, Anthem, which was first published in 1938,

87
00:10:31.560 --> 00:10:35.840
fourteen years after the first publication of We.

88
00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:40.820
Rand revised Anthem slightly a few years later for the second edition, which appeared in

89
00:10:40.820 --> 00:10:43.480
1946.

90
00:10:43.480 --> 00:10:47.460
Did she read We before 1938?

91
00:10:47.460 --> 00:10:53.460
In an excellent article, Zamiattin and Rand, published in 2003 in the Journal of Ayn Rand

92
00:10:53.460 --> 00:11:00.620
Studies and now available online, Peter St. André argues that Zamiattin's We was quite

93
00:11:00.620 --> 00:11:04.720
likely a formative influence on Ayn Rand.

94
00:11:04.720 --> 00:11:10.920
He points out that We was completed in 1921, the same year Rand entered the University

95
00:11:10.920 --> 00:11:16.620
of Petrograd as a student of history, philosophy and literature.

96
00:11:16.620 --> 00:11:24.580
Zamyatin's college years, 1921 to 1924, were, as St. André notes, the years of Zamyatin's

97
00:11:24.580 --> 00:11:28.720
greatest fame and influence in Petrograd.

98
00:11:28.720 --> 00:11:35.180
He was, at that time, St. André writes, a hero to writers young and old, admired for

99
00:11:35.180 --> 00:11:41.740
his fierce independence and literary individualism, for he was virtually the only literary figure

100
00:11:41.740 --> 00:11:54.260
Zamyatin was in those years a highly public literary and philosophical presence in Petersburg,

101
00:11:54.260 --> 00:11:59.700
and it is quite possible that Rand read some of his stories and essays, or attended one

102
00:11:59.700 --> 00:12:02.540
of his many public lectures.

103
00:12:02.540 --> 00:12:08.740
It also seems probable, St. André continues, that Rand read Zamyatin's Wee in the English

104
00:12:08.740 --> 00:12:17.380
Translation by Gregory Zilborg, published in 1924, for in a 1934 letter to her agent

105
00:12:17.380 --> 00:12:23.380
regarding the manuscript for We the Living, she said, I have watched very carefully all

106
00:12:23.380 --> 00:12:28.180
the literature on the new Russia that has appeared in English.

107
00:12:28.180 --> 00:12:34.300
If she did read We during the 20s or 30s, Rand probably read it in English.

108
00:12:34.300 --> 00:12:38.060
It was not published in Russian during that time, you see.

109
00:12:38.060 --> 00:12:42.680
It was not published in Russian, in fact, until 1952.

110
00:12:42.680 --> 00:12:47.820
It was not published in the Soviet Union until 1988.

111
00:12:47.820 --> 00:12:53.700
After finishing the novel in 1921, Zamyatin found that no publisher was willing to risk

112
00:12:53.700 --> 00:12:55.220
publishing it.

113
00:12:55.220 --> 00:13:01.500
He circulated it in manuscript around Petrograd, but according to translator Natasha Randall,

114
00:13:01.500 --> 00:13:06.700
a teenage university student majoring in history was unlikely to have seen it in

115
00:13:06.700 --> 00:13:08.460
that format.

116
00:13:08.460 --> 00:13:12.460
It probably was read by the circle of writers in St. Petersburg at the time,

117
00:13:12.460 --> 00:13:18.140
but it won't have gotten very much further.

118
00:13:18.140 --> 00:13:25.180
By 1924 the situation had not only not improved, it had actually become worse.

119
00:13:25.180 --> 00:13:28.700
The Bolshevik government had banned WII.

120
00:13:28.700 --> 00:13:34.220
Now it wasn't just a matter of publishers being too cowardly to bring the book out.

121
00:13:34.220 --> 00:13:41.500
Now it was a certainty that Zamyatin's book would not be printed and sold in the Soviet Union.

122
00:13:41.500 --> 00:13:50.180
Natasha Randall says there is irony in this because Zamyatin had run afoul of the Tsar's censors early in his career

123
00:13:50.180 --> 00:13:56.380
and had become a Bolshevik himself out of a desire to bring down the Tsar's government.

124
00:13:56.380 --> 00:14:03.780
He was a very ardent revolutionary. In fact, what Zamiatin was, though, was a person who

125
00:14:03.780 --> 00:14:10.260
believed in permanent revolution, that once people decide that change no longer needs

126
00:14:10.260 --> 00:14:17.220
to occur, that that's where the problem begins. So when the revolution started to stagnate

127
00:14:17.220 --> 00:14:22.220
was when Zamiatin became very disenchanted with it. And he wrote these brilliant essays,

128
00:14:22.220 --> 00:14:42.220
Silence in his native land by the Bolsheviks, desperate for readers, Zamyatin consented to an offer to publish his novel in English translation.

129
00:14:42.220 --> 00:14:51.220
It was this English language edition, brought out in London in 1924, that was the first appearance of We in print.

130
00:14:51.220 --> 00:14:57.940
Ayn Rand spent a few days in London en route to America from Petrograd in 1926.

131
00:14:57.940 --> 00:15:01.940
She might have picked up a copy of Wee while she was there.

132
00:15:01.940 --> 00:15:06.980
Or she might have read that very same British edition of Zamiattin's novel in the United

133
00:15:06.980 --> 00:15:11.260
States later in the 20s or in the early 30s.

134
00:15:11.260 --> 00:15:16.660
For even if Rand hadn't been in a position to read Wee in manuscript while a student

135
00:15:16.660 --> 00:15:18.940
at Petrograd University.

136
00:15:18.940 --> 00:15:22.660
She certainly knew Zamyatin by reputation.

137
00:15:22.660 --> 00:15:28.580
As Peter St. André points out, Zamyatin was a highly public literary and philosophical

138
00:15:28.580 --> 00:15:35.080
presence in Petrograd in the early 20s, when Ayn Rand was a college student, already dreaming

139
00:15:35.080 --> 00:15:40.220
of escaping from the Soviet Union and moving to America.

140
00:15:40.220 --> 00:15:46.140
But whatever we decide about whether Rand read we in the 20s or 30s, there's simply

141
00:15:46.140 --> 00:15:53.120
Having no getting around the obvious similarities between Zamyatin's novel and Rand's Anthem.

142
00:15:53.120 --> 00:15:59.500
Both are set in the far future in a completely collectivized totalitarian society.

143
00:15:59.500 --> 00:16:05.020
Both are told in the first person by their main characters, in We by the mathematician

144
00:16:05.020 --> 00:16:14.380
and engineer D-503, in Anthem by the engineer Equality-72521.

145
00:16:14.380 --> 00:16:20.220
Anthem is the only work of fiction written by Rand to be written in the first person.

146
00:16:20.220 --> 00:16:28.540
In We, D-503 meets a woman, I-330, and is led inexorably down a path to rebellion against

147
00:16:28.540 --> 00:16:32.260
the government of the society in which he lives.

148
00:16:32.260 --> 00:16:41.940
In Anthem, Equality 72521 meets a woman, Liberty 53000, and is led inexorably down a path to

149
00:16:41.940 --> 00:16:47.080
to Rebellion against the Government of the Society in which He Lives.

150
00:16:47.080 --> 00:16:55.420
In the society in which Equality 72521 lives, the first-person singular pronoun, I, has ceased

151
00:16:55.420 --> 00:16:57.220
to exist.

152
00:16:57.220 --> 00:17:02.960
In D-503's society, in we, the pronoun is still in use.

153
00:17:02.960 --> 00:17:09.620
But the mindset of the two far-future societies is very much cut from the same cloth.

154
00:17:09.620 --> 00:17:17.100
Each morning, Zamyatin's D-503 writes, with six-wheeled precision, at the exact same hour,

155
00:17:17.100 --> 00:17:22.660
at the exact same minute, we, the millions, rise as one.

156
00:17:22.660 --> 00:17:29.060
At the exact same hour, we unimillionally start work, and unimillionally stop work.

157
00:17:29.060 --> 00:17:36.300
And, merged into a single, million-handed body, at the exact same table-appointed second,

158
00:17:36.300 --> 00:17:42.160
We bring spoons to our lips, we go out for our walk, and go to the auditorium, to the

159
00:17:42.160 --> 00:17:46.000
Taylor Exercise Hall, go off to sleep.

160
00:17:46.000 --> 00:17:52.000
The small bright crystal bell in the bed's headboard rings, seven o'clock, it's time

161
00:17:52.000 --> 00:17:53.480
to get up.

162
00:17:53.480 --> 00:18:00.000
On the right, on the left, through the glass walls, it's as if I'm seeing myself, my room,

163
00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:05.380
my night-shirt, my motions, repeating themselves a thousand times.

164
00:18:05.380 --> 00:18:06.900
This cheers me up.

165
00:18:06.900 --> 00:18:11.300
One sees oneself as part of an enormous, powerful unit.

166
00:18:11.300 --> 00:18:18.180
We walk, one million-headed body, with a humble joy in each of us, similar, I imagine, to

167
00:18:18.180 --> 00:18:22.900
what molecules, atoms and phagocytes experience.

168
00:18:22.900 --> 00:18:29.060
The Christians of the ancient world, our only predecessors, as imperfect as they were, also

169
00:18:29.060 --> 00:18:31.320
understood this.

170
00:18:31.320 --> 00:18:35.020
Humility is a virtue, and pride is a vice.

171
00:18:35.020 --> 00:18:40.460
He is Divine and I is Satanic.

172
00:18:40.460 --> 00:18:47.060
Yevgeny Zamyatin was born in rural Russia on February 20, 1884.

173
00:18:47.060 --> 00:18:56.160
He died just a little more than 53 years later, in exile in Paris, on March 10, 1937.

174
00:18:56.160 --> 00:19:02.300
His only novel was not widely read during his brief life, nor is it widely read today.

175
00:19:02.300 --> 00:19:07.720
It has become one of those classics people would rather acknowledge as classics than

176
00:19:07.720 --> 00:19:10.380
actually sit down to read.

177
00:19:10.380 --> 00:19:15.700
But it has exercised an immense influence, especially in the English-speaking world,

178
00:19:15.700 --> 00:19:21.180
thanks to writers like George Orwell, who did read it, and writers like Aldous Huxley

179
00:19:21.180 --> 00:19:24.460
and Ayn Rand, who probably read it.

180
00:19:24.460 --> 00:19:32.460
By influencing their more famous dystopian novels, 1984, Brave New World and Anthem,

181
00:19:32.460 --> 00:19:38.380
We has made itself an honored place in the libertarian tradition.

182
00:19:38.380 --> 00:19:39.260
This is Jeff Rigenbach.

183
00:19:54.460 --> 00:19:56.460
www.fieggen.com
