WEBVTT

NOTE Foreword

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000
The Man vs. the State by Herbert Spencer

2
00:00:05.000 --> 00:00:09.000
Forward by Eric Mack

3
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:18.000
Herbert Spencer produced four major works in political philosophy, plus numerous additional and important essays.

4
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:25.000
The first of these works, The Proper Sphere of Government in 1842, is the least well known.

5
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:34.000
The second is Spencer's most famous systemic treatise in this area, Social Statics, of 1851.

6
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:42.000
The Man versus the State, 1884, which is the centrepiece of this volume, is the third major political work.

7
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:51.000
This is a more polemical and quasi-sociological work than either the first two or Spencer's fourth major political study, Justice,

8
00:00:51.000 --> 00:00:57.640
Part IV of The Principles of Ethics, 1891

9
00:00:57.640 --> 00:01:02.160
In addition to presenting the first and third of these studies, the present volume makes

10
00:01:02.160 --> 00:01:10.000
available two of Spencer's relatively early political essays, Over Legislation, 1853,

11
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:18.140
and Representative Government, 1857. Two of his important essays in political sociology,

12
00:01:18.140 --> 00:01:30.960
The Social Organism 1860 and Specialized Administration 1871 and From Freedom to Bondage 1891, which

13
00:01:30.960 --> 00:01:37.760
extends the polemical and analytic themes of the man versus the state.

14
00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:44.280
Herbert Spencer was born in Derby, England on April 27, 1820.

15
00:01:44.280 --> 00:01:49.280
He entered a family of dissenting clergymen and teachers in which a long opposition to

16
00:01:49.280 --> 00:01:55.780
state-church ties and solid identification with the rising commercial classes had bred

17
00:01:55.780 --> 00:02:02.680
a strong anti-statist individualism. Both his father, George Spencer, and his uncle,

18
00:02:02.680 --> 00:02:08.360
the Reverend Thomas Spencer, were supporters of church disestablishment, the anti-corn law

19
00:02:08.360 --> 00:02:12.560
and the extension of the franchise.

20
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:18.520
As autodidacts and teachers, Spencer's father and uncles looked to the sciences and their

21
00:02:18.520 --> 00:02:23.440
practical applications rather than to the classical tradition.

22
00:02:23.440 --> 00:02:29.720
Their anti-statist individualism and their scientifically oriented rationalism were passed

23
00:02:29.720 --> 00:02:32.560
on to Herbert Spencer.

24
00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:38.800
Spencer himself points to the possible Hussite and Huguenot origins of family as a partial

25
00:02:38.800 --> 00:02:46.680
explanation of his own individualism and disregard for authority, and he often recounts how his

26
00:02:46.680 --> 00:02:52.680
belief in a universe entirely governed by natural causal law grew out of his father's

27
00:02:52.680 --> 00:03:00.000
scientific interests and curiosity about the causes of natural phenomena.

28
00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:05.400
Spencer's education was almost entirely in the hands of his father and, later, his uncles

29
00:03:05.400 --> 00:03:12.400
William and Thomas. The focus was on the natural and biological sciences. He gathered plants

30
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:19.080
and insects, performed experiments, sketched and worked out problems in mathematics, and

31
00:03:19.080 --> 00:03:25.200
attended lectures at the Derby Philosophical Society. When Spencer was in his teens, his

32
00:03:25.200 --> 00:03:31.320
His uncle Thomas sought to broaden his education with classics, languages and history, but

33
00:03:31.320 --> 00:03:39.200
his rebellious nephew proved to be relatively immune to such useless and dogmatic pastimes.

34
00:03:39.200 --> 00:03:45.560
In November 1837, just after Victoria ascended the throne, Spencer joined the engineering

35
00:03:45.560 --> 00:03:54.560
staff of the London and Birmingham railway. Until 1841, and again from 1845 through 1848,

36
00:03:54.560 --> 00:03:59.740
Working for a number of different firms, Spencer participated in the great expensive phase

37
00:03:59.740 --> 00:04:05.860
of railway construction. He appears to have been highly competent and successful at all

38
00:04:05.860 --> 00:04:12.780
the engineering tasks undertaken. During these years and later, Spencer produced a variety

39
00:04:12.780 --> 00:04:20.860
of mechanical inventions, and between 1839 and 1842 he published seven articles in The

40
00:04:20.860 --> 00:04:27.100
The Civil Engineers and Architects Journal Only his greater interest in a literary career

41
00:04:27.100 --> 00:04:33.560
and, perhaps, the difficulty that this sober and intense young man had in forming warm

42
00:04:33.560 --> 00:04:39.860
relations with his colleagues precluded a full-term career in civil engineering.

43
00:04:39.860 --> 00:04:44.700
In later years, this spectacular growth of the British rail system was continually to

44
00:04:44.700 --> 00:04:51.700
In the spring of 1842, Spencer began a series of letters to the radical dissenting journal,

45
00:04:51.700 --> 00:05:05.460
and, just as continually, he used the failure of municipal governments to restrict the noise of trains as an example of the failure of governments to carry out their proper negative functions.

46
00:05:05.460 --> 00:05:14.260
In the spring of 1842, Spencer began a series of letters to the radical dissenting journal, The Non-Conformist.

47
00:05:14.260 --> 00:05:19.780
reprinted in pamphlet form, The Proper Sphere of Government, is in some respects his most

48
00:05:19.780 --> 00:05:26.780
radical political essay. Spencer maintains that justice construed as respect for natural

49
00:05:26.780 --> 00:05:33.400
rights, and not any direct pursuit of the general good, should be the guide for determining

50
00:05:33.400 --> 00:05:39.940
the sphere of governmental action. This standard requires of individuals only that they not

51
00:05:39.940 --> 00:05:45.280
not engage in positive acts of oppression while it requires that the government act

52
00:05:45.280 --> 00:05:51.280
only to intervene against such positively oppressive actions.

53
00:05:51.280 --> 00:05:56.920
The publication of The Proper Sphere of Government coincided with Spencer's only intense and

54
00:05:56.920 --> 00:06:03.660
sustained period of practical political involvement. He served as the secretary of the Derby branch

55
00:06:03.660 --> 00:06:09.900
of the Complete Suffrage Union and wrote numerous short tracks for this group, as well as for

56
00:06:09.900 --> 00:06:13.940
for the Anti-State Church Association.

57
00:06:13.940 --> 00:06:19.200
The non-remunerative character of his literary activities during this period explains his

58
00:06:19.200 --> 00:06:23.420
return to railway engineering in 1845.

59
00:06:23.420 --> 00:06:29.780
In 1848, however, Spencer secured a post as a sub-editor of The Economist.

60
00:06:29.780 --> 00:06:35.500
At this time, The Economist was the premier organ for free trade and laissez-faire, and

61
00:06:35.500 --> 00:06:40.140
Spencer's submission of a copy of The Proper Sphere of Government can hardly have prejudiced

62
00:06:40.140 --> 00:06:43.900
his application.

63
00:06:43.900 --> 00:06:49.420
Spencer's five years at The Economist were spent in essentially non-ideological ordering

64
00:06:49.420 --> 00:06:56.420
of news items, but in Social Statics, published during the third year, he deepened and systematized

65
00:06:56.420 --> 00:07:01.300
the doctrine of The Proper Sphere of Government.

66
00:07:01.300 --> 00:07:06.940
The decade following the publication and moderate success of social statics was devoted to the

67
00:07:06.940 --> 00:07:12.580
composition of a number of crucial papers developing Spencer's Lamarckian-oriented

68
00:07:12.580 --> 00:07:21.180
evolutionary perspective and also of a series of important political and sociological essays.

69
00:07:21.180 --> 00:07:26.220
Though Spencer's health and finances continued to be in precarious condition, during this

70
00:07:26.220 --> 00:07:38.220
In this period he entered into friendships with many of England's most notable intellectual figures, including George Eliot, Thomas Huxley, George Lewis and John Stuart Mill.

71
00:07:38.220 --> 00:07:51.220
Spencer's status as a political heretic during this and succeeding decades should not obscure his broader role as a valued member of the scientific secularist intellectual community.

72
00:07:51.220 --> 00:08:06.220
In 1858, Spencer formulated the ambitious outline for his synthetic philosophy, on which he was to work in the face of competing projects and recurring in ill hell for the next 38 years.

73
00:08:06.220 --> 00:08:17.220
This scheme included his first principles, plus multi-volume works in the principles of biology, psychology, sociology and ethics.

74
00:08:17.220 --> 00:08:22.660
To fund this project, Spencer at first sought the income of some undemanding governmental

75
00:08:22.660 --> 00:08:29.540
post in the India administration as a prison governor, as a postal official, or even as

76
00:08:29.540 --> 00:08:37.060
a member of the consular service. No suitable posts were available, and, instead, Spencer

77
00:08:37.060 --> 00:08:43.460
developed a subscription arrangement to finance his great project. Crucial to this arrangement,

78
00:08:43.460 --> 00:08:59.540
When in the mid-sixties his financial construction collapsed due to the subscribers' non-payments

79
00:08:59.540 --> 00:09:04.940
and Spencer's delays in issuing sections of the synthetic philosophy, Mill offered to

80
00:09:04.940 --> 00:09:12.580
cover Spencer's immediate losses and to organize a subvention for Spencer's continued work.

81
00:09:12.580 --> 00:09:18.700
Spencer refused this charitable aid. However, when humans organized a fund among American

82
00:09:18.700 --> 00:09:25.580
admirers which would either be paid to Spencer or revert to his American publishers, Spencer,

83
00:09:25.580 --> 00:09:33.320
who detested publishers more than he disliked charity, could not refuse.

84
00:09:33.320 --> 00:09:39.320
The political essays of this decade following the publication of social statics, which are

85
00:09:39.320 --> 00:09:46.800
are reprinted here, over legislation and representative government, can easily be read as elaborations

86
00:09:46.800 --> 00:09:52.840
upon the doctrine of social statics. We find a thoroughly general attack on the efficacy

87
00:09:52.840 --> 00:09:58.440
of governmental action and a faith that progress will bring the demise of superstitious belief

88
00:09:58.440 --> 00:10:06.400
in government omnipotence, albeit this belief will die hard. We find a continued expectation

89
00:10:06.400 --> 00:10:11.540
saying that only general suffrage will block class legislation.

90
00:10:11.540 --> 00:10:18.800
Only in a general diffusion of political power is there safeguard for the general welfare.

91
00:10:18.800 --> 00:10:24.320
But effective voter vigilance is possible only when representative government is confined

92
00:10:24.320 --> 00:10:31.800
to enforcing the simple and permanent principles of equity, and not when that government attempts

93
00:10:31.800 --> 00:10:38.020
The complex business of regulating the entire national life.

94
00:10:38.020 --> 00:10:45.020
The two sociological essays reprinted here, The Social Organism and Specialized Administration

95
00:10:45.020 --> 00:10:51.000
represent another and not entirely compatible side of Spencer's thought.

96
00:10:51.000 --> 00:10:56.320
The relationship between Spencer's political thought and both his general evolutionism

97
00:10:56.320 --> 00:11:03.800
and his evolutionary sociology are too intricate and confused to be untangled here, or perhaps

98
00:11:03.800 --> 00:11:05.440
anywhere.

99
00:11:05.440 --> 00:11:10.160
But a few points can be made with special regard to these two essays.

100
00:11:10.160 --> 00:11:15.480
The foremost is that the main purpose of the social organism metaphor is to emphasize the

101
00:11:15.480 --> 00:11:21.680
non-mechanical, non-intentional, yet mutually coordinated character of the processes which

102
00:11:21.680 --> 00:11:28.680
which give rise to and sustain any given society and its institutions, and the pervasiveness

103
00:11:28.680 --> 00:11:35.200
in any complex society of social orders and structures which are, in Hayek's recent language,

104
00:11:35.200 --> 00:11:40.400
the result of human action but not of human design.

105
00:11:40.400 --> 00:11:46.520
The metaphor also serves to highlight further parallels between, for example, the physiological

106
00:11:46.520 --> 00:11:50.540
and the economic divisions of labour.

107
00:11:50.540 --> 00:11:56.340
It was no part of Spencer's intention to advocate any form of moral or methodological

108
00:11:56.340 --> 00:12:03.340
organicism. Thus he asserts that in contrast to biological organisms, the corporate life

109
00:12:04.260 --> 00:12:10.660
of society must be subservient to the lives of the parts instead of the lives of the parts

110
00:12:10.660 --> 00:12:17.660
being subservient to the corporate life. Yet here too intention and result part company,

111
00:12:17.660 --> 00:12:24.060
Company, for within the social organism we find Spencer proclaiming that our Houses of

112
00:12:24.060 --> 00:12:30.020
Parliament discharge in the social economy functions which are in sundry respects comparable

113
00:12:30.020 --> 00:12:37.020
to those discharged by the cerebral masses in a vertebrate animal. Such assertions clearly

114
00:12:38.140 --> 00:12:44.720
paved the way for T. H. Huckley to claim in Administrative Nihilism that an implication

115
00:12:44.720 --> 00:12:50.120
The definition of the organism metaphor was that the economy can, and occasionally should,

116
00:12:50.120 --> 00:12:55.560
be the subject of Parliament's intentional control and manipulation, just as a biological

117
00:12:55.560 --> 00:13:01.680
organism's body can and usually should be controlled and manipulated by that individual's

118
00:13:01.680 --> 00:13:05.800
central nervous system.

119
00:13:05.800 --> 00:13:12.820
Spencer's response in specialized administration is, unfortunately, both implausible and doctrinally

120
00:13:12.820 --> 00:13:42.820
He maintains that both the higher biological organism and the higher social organism display systems of passive, negatively regulative control over inner organs and their interrelations and systems of active, positively regulative control over outer organs and the relationship of these organs to the external environment, but in order to maintain the parallelism with respect to inner organs,

121
00:13:42.820 --> 00:14:02.660
In order to maintain the parallelism with respect to outer organs, Spencer must hold

122
00:14:02.660 --> 00:14:08.100
that in foreign affairs the state is to go beyond the administration of justice into

123
00:14:08.100 --> 00:14:11.340
the realm of positive action.

124
00:14:11.340 --> 00:14:17.300
This appears to be inconsistent with Spencer's rejection of offensive war, colonialism and

125
00:14:17.300 --> 00:14:20.740
government control of foreign trade.

126
00:14:20.740 --> 00:14:25.980
Spencer fails to see the implications of granting the government a positive regulatory function

127
00:14:25.980 --> 00:14:32.820
in external affairs because he confuses this significant concession with the truism, applicable

128
00:14:32.820 --> 00:14:38.300
to both internal and external affairs, that the government must have positive control

129
00:14:38.300 --> 00:14:42.820
over its own apparatus.

130
00:14:42.820 --> 00:14:48.840
Spencer's growing fame and financial security through the 1870s and 1880s was matched neither

131
00:14:48.840 --> 00:14:51.980
by happiness nor good health.

132
00:14:51.980 --> 00:14:56.460
At least in part, the personal tragedy of the second half of Spencer's life was due

133
00:14:56.460 --> 00:15:03.820
to his perception of an evolutionary regression after 1850 back towards a mercantilistic and

134
00:15:03.820 --> 00:15:12.060
and Warlike Social Order of the sort he labelled militant. Although in one letter he described

135
00:15:12.060 --> 00:15:19.140
the man versus the state as the finished form toward which he had been working for 42 years

136
00:15:19.140 --> 00:15:25.380
and as a positive creed for the advancement of party and politics, for the most part he

137
00:15:25.380 --> 00:15:31.960
was deeply pessimistic about stopping the drift to Communism. By the time this work

138
00:15:31.960 --> 00:15:38.200
was composed, Spencer no longer saw his task to be charting the course of progress which

139
00:15:38.200 --> 00:15:46.960
mankind would be following. Rather, it was his duty to oppose the process of rebarbarization.

140
00:15:46.960 --> 00:15:53.540
The essays of The Man vs. the State are Spencer's most sustained, brilliant, and bitter act

141
00:15:53.540 --> 00:16:00.140
of resistance. The New Toryism seeks to define true liberalism

142
00:16:00.140 --> 00:16:07.680
and to explain how the Liberal Party had come to advocate a new system of state power.

143
00:16:07.680 --> 00:16:13.980
The coming slavery offers a rich explanation of how increments to state power set in play

144
00:16:13.980 --> 00:16:21.060
are dynamic, the ultimate consequences of which are despotism and enslavement.

145
00:16:21.060 --> 00:16:27.460
The sins of legislators attacks legislators' ignorance both of economic laws which coordinate

146
00:16:27.460 --> 00:16:33.480
People's Desires and Efforts, and Evolutionary Law which requires that in the course of progress

147
00:16:33.480 --> 00:16:36.860
sufferings must be endured.

148
00:16:36.860 --> 00:16:42.200
Here we find an invocation of the survival of the fittest, though it must be remembered

149
00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:48.260
that for Spencer the fittest are those well adapted to cooperative social life and even

150
00:16:48.260 --> 00:16:55.920
those in whom spontaneous sympathy engenders aid to the unfortunate worthy.

151
00:16:55.920 --> 00:17:01.960
The Great Political Superstition attacks the doctrine of unlimited governmental sovereignty,

152
00:17:01.960 --> 00:17:07.480
whether monarchical or parliamentary, and the associated doctrine that rights are created

153
00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:12.920
by the State and may, with equal ease, be abolished by the State.

154
00:17:12.920 --> 00:17:18.840
The latter portion of this essay stands as an impressive summary of Spencer's political

155
00:17:18.840 --> 00:17:21.120
worldview.

156
00:17:21.120 --> 00:17:28.120
The present volume closes with From Freedom to Bondage, one of Spencer's best expositions

157
00:17:28.120 --> 00:17:35.620
of his contrast between voluntary industrial society, the society of contract, and compulsory

158
00:17:35.620 --> 00:17:40.280
militant society, the society of status.

159
00:17:40.280 --> 00:17:47.160
We find here prophecies as vivid as Bakunin's about the plight of actual workers subordinated

160
00:17:47.160 --> 00:17:54.160
to an Army of Officials United by Interests Common to Officialdom.

161
00:17:55.800 --> 00:18:01.400
Two of the issues that appear in these later essays operated to further Spencer's defensiveness

162
00:18:01.400 --> 00:18:04.000
and isolation.

163
00:18:04.000 --> 00:18:10.120
Spencer vehemently attacked Henry George and land nationalizers, and was, in turn, attacked

164
00:18:10.120 --> 00:18:16.320
for having abandoned his own belief in the societal ownership of land.

165
00:18:16.320 --> 00:18:22.760
which in particular criticized Spencer's alleged apostasy, which seemed to be epitomized by

166
00:18:22.760 --> 00:18:29.200
the disappearance of the chapter on the right to use the earth from the 1892 edition of

167
00:18:29.200 --> 00:18:32.020
social statics.

168
00:18:32.020 --> 00:18:37.240
Spencer's angry response was that in principles his views had never changed.

169
00:18:37.240 --> 00:18:43.020
He continued to believe in the societal ownership of land and in just compensation to current

170
00:18:43.020 --> 00:18:50.540
Landholders, at least for the costs of improvements. Since, however, he had come to realize, on

171
00:18:50.540 --> 00:18:56.260
the basis of reasoning that can only be classified as suspect, that society could not afford

172
00:18:56.260 --> 00:19:02.100
to pay this just compensation, and since the current rampant officialism would translate

173
00:19:02.100 --> 00:19:08.500
social ownership into socialism, he rejected explicit social reappropriation under the

174
00:19:08.500 --> 00:19:24.500
and further he declared that the whole issue was moot because everyone, including the author of The Great Political Superstition, acknowledged Parliament's ultimate sovereignty over the land.

175
00:19:24.500 --> 00:19:33.500
The land question controversy has become one of the test cases for all theories about Spencer's purported drift to conservatism.

176
00:19:33.500 --> 00:19:39.860
satisfying answers to questions about whether or in what sense there was such a drift, and

177
00:19:39.860 --> 00:19:45.580
about how such a drift might be explained, are crucial to a full understanding of Spencer

178
00:19:45.580 --> 00:19:49.380
and are yet to be provided.

179
00:19:49.380 --> 00:19:54.620
In contrast, with the significant exception of Spencer's sometime acceptance of conscription

180
00:19:54.620 --> 00:20:00.820
in defensive war, Spencer remained clearly and adamantly non-conservative in his opposition

181
00:20:00.820 --> 00:20:07.820
and Intermilitarism and Imperialism. In the early 1880s, Spencer returned to active politics

182
00:20:08.100 --> 00:20:15.100
in an unsuccessful attempt to build an influential anti-aggressive league. It was to these futile

183
00:20:15.340 --> 00:20:21.340
efforts plus the demands of his American tour in the summer and fall of 1882 that Spencer

184
00:20:21.340 --> 00:20:28.340
ascribed a further breakdown in health. Nevertheless, throughout the 1880s and 1890s, Spencer attacked

185
00:20:28.340 --> 00:20:33.600
In the late 1890s, Spencer attacked and tried to organize public opinion against aggressive

186
00:20:33.600 --> 00:20:36.420
British involvement abroad.

187
00:20:36.420 --> 00:20:43.060
In The Sins of Legislators, his greatest ire is directed at those alleged liberal imperialists

188
00:20:43.060 --> 00:20:48.460
who, though they cannot bear to think of the evils accompanying the struggle for existence

189
00:20:48.460 --> 00:20:54.260
as it is carried on without violence among individuals in their own society, contemplate

190
00:20:54.260 --> 00:21:10.340
For Spencer, it was the growth of explicit militarism which, through numerous channels,

191
00:21:10.340 --> 00:21:16.500
was the underlying cause of the social regression of the last decades of the nineteenth century.

192
00:21:16.500 --> 00:21:23.800
And as he concludes in From Freedom to Bondage, everywhere and at all times chronic war generates

193
00:21:23.800 --> 00:21:28.800
is the militant type of structure, not in the body of soldiers only, but throughout

194
00:21:28.800 --> 00:21:32.840
the community at large.

195
00:21:32.840 --> 00:21:38.440
The vision of a nation which had forfeited its historical opportunity and had thereby

196
00:21:38.440 --> 00:21:45.860
defeated Spencer's youthful hopes and prophecies dominated Spencer's declining years.

197
00:21:45.860 --> 00:21:52.940
The bitterness and the sadness of this vision show through in Spencer's final acts of resistance.

198
00:21:52.940 --> 00:22:04.540
His Essays on Regimentation, Rebarbarization and Imperialism and Slavery, published in 1902.

199
00:22:04.540 --> 00:22:11.100
When Herbert Spencer died on December 8, 1903, it was with the conviction that, at least

200
00:22:11.100 --> 00:22:17.500
as a political thinker and writer, his life had been in vain.

201
00:22:17.500 --> 00:22:22.060
Eric Mack Tulane University