WEBVTT

NOTE Introduction

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
The Man vs. the State by Herbert Spencer

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:08.920
Introduction by Albert J. Nock

3
00:00:08.920 --> 00:00:12.520
I

4
00:00:12.520 --> 00:00:19.200
In 1851, Herbert Spencer published a treatise called Social Statics or The Conditions Essential

5
00:00:19.200 --> 00:00:27.320
to Human Happiness Specified. Among other specifications, this work established and made clear the fundamental

6
00:00:27.320 --> 00:00:31.360
It is the fundamental principle that society should be organized on the basis of voluntary

7
00:00:31.360 --> 00:00:38.040
cooperation, not on the basis of compulsory cooperation or under the threat of it.

8
00:00:38.040 --> 00:00:43.520
In a word, it established the principle of individualism as against statism, against

9
00:00:43.520 --> 00:00:48.680
the principle underlying all the collective doctrines which are everywhere dominant at

10
00:00:48.680 --> 00:00:51.180
the present time.

11
00:00:51.180 --> 00:00:57.120
It contemplated the reduction of state power over the individual to an absolute minimum,

12
00:00:57.120 --> 00:01:02.820
and the raising of social power to its maximum, as against the principle of statism, which

13
00:01:02.820 --> 00:01:08.720
contemplates the precise opposite. Spencer maintained that the state's interventions

14
00:01:08.720 --> 00:01:14.720
upon the individual should be confined to punishing those crimes against person or property,

15
00:01:14.720 --> 00:01:21.600
which are recognized as such by what the Scots philosophers called the common sense of mankind,

16
00:01:21.600 --> 00:01:29.140
Enforcing the Obligations of Contract and Making Justice Costless and Easily Accessible.

17
00:01:29.140 --> 00:01:31.640
Beyond this, the state should not go.

18
00:01:31.640 --> 00:01:37.280
It should put no further coercive restraint upon the individual.

19
00:01:37.280 --> 00:01:43.560
All that the state can do for the best interests of society, all it can do to promote a permanent

20
00:01:43.560 --> 00:01:50.600
and stable well-being of society, is by way of those purely negative interventions.

21
00:01:50.600 --> 00:01:56.240
Let it go beyond them and attempt the promotion of society's well-being by positive, coercive

22
00:01:56.240 --> 00:02:01.400
interventions upon the citizen, and whatever apparent and temporary social good may be

23
00:02:01.400 --> 00:02:07.400
affected will be greatly at the cost of real and permanent social good.

24
00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:13.520
Spencer's work of 1851 is long out of print and out of currency.

25
00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:16.720
A copy of it is extremely hard to find.

26
00:02:16.720 --> 00:02:21.740
It should be republished, for it is to the philosophy of individualism what the work

27
00:02:21.740 --> 00:02:27.840
of the German idealist philosophers is to the doctrine of statism, what Das Kapital is

28
00:02:27.840 --> 00:02:36.080
to statist economic theory, or what the Pauline epistles are to the theology of Protestantism.

29
00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:42.320
It had no effect, or very little, on checking the riotous progress of statism in England,

30
00:02:42.320 --> 00:02:47.440
still less in staying the calamitous consequences of that progress.

31
00:02:47.440 --> 00:02:53.600
From 1851 down to his death at the end of the century, Spencer wrote occasional essays

32
00:02:53.600 --> 00:03:00.320
partly as running comment on the acceleration of statism's progress, partly as expedition

33
00:03:00.320 --> 00:03:07.520
by force of illustration an example, and partly as remarkably accurate prophecy of what has

34
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:12.620
have since come to pass in consequence of the wholesale substitution of the principle

35
00:03:12.620 --> 00:03:19.380
of compulsory cooperation, the statist principle, for the individualist principle of voluntary

36
00:03:19.380 --> 00:03:22.320
cooperation.

37
00:03:22.320 --> 00:03:30.080
He reissued four of these essays in 1884 under the title The Man vs. the State, and these

38
00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:36.840
four essays, together with two others, called Over Legislation and From Freedom to Bondage,

39
00:03:36.840 --> 00:03:41.560
are now reprinted here under the same general title.

40
00:03:41.560 --> 00:03:43.760
2.

41
00:03:43.760 --> 00:03:50.240
The first essay, The New Taurism, is of primary importance just now, because it shows the

42
00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:57.080
contrast between the aims and methods of early liberalism and those of modern liberalism.

43
00:03:57.080 --> 00:04:03.100
In these days we hear a great deal about liberalism, liberal principles and policies in the conduct

44
00:04:03.100 --> 00:04:09.220
of Our Public Life. All sorts and conditions of men put themselves forward on the public

45
00:04:09.220 --> 00:04:15.300
stage as liberals. They call those who oppose them Tories and get credit with the public

46
00:04:15.300 --> 00:04:22.540
thereby. In the public mind, liberalism is a term of honor, while Toryism, especially

47
00:04:22.540 --> 00:04:30.820
economic Toryism, is a term of reproach. Needless to say, these terms are never examined. The

48
00:04:30.820 --> 00:04:36.300
The self-styled liberal is taken, popularly, at the face value of his pretensions, and

49
00:04:36.300 --> 00:04:42.860
policies which are put forth as liberal are accepted in the same unreflecting way.

50
00:04:42.860 --> 00:04:48.400
This being so, it is useful to see what the historic sense of the term is, and to see

51
00:04:48.400 --> 00:04:53.780
how far the aims and methods of latter-day liberalism can be brought into correspondence

52
00:04:53.780 --> 00:05:08.220
Spencer shows that the early liberal was consistently for cutting down the state's coercive power

53
00:05:08.220 --> 00:05:14.280
over the citizen wherever this was possible. He was for reducing to a minimum the number

54
00:05:14.280 --> 00:05:20.460
of points at which the state might make coercive interventions upon the individual. He was

55
00:05:20.460 --> 00:05:27.060
was for steady enlarging the margin of existence within which a citizen might pursue and regulate

56
00:05:27.060 --> 00:05:34.860
his own activities as he saw fit, free of state control or state supervision.

57
00:05:34.860 --> 00:05:41.180
Liberal policies and measures, as originally conceived, were such as reflected these aims.

58
00:05:41.180 --> 00:05:45.760
The Tory, on the other hand, was opposed to these aims, and his policies reflected this

59
00:05:45.760 --> 00:05:47.360
opposition.

60
00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:54.180
In general terms, the liberal was consistently inclined towards the individualist philosophy

61
00:05:54.180 --> 00:06:01.560
of society, while the Tory was consistently inclined towards the statist philosophy.

62
00:06:01.560 --> 00:06:07.560
Spencer shows, moreover, that as a matter of practical policy, the early liberal proceeded

63
00:06:07.560 --> 00:06:12.120
towards the realization of his aims by the method of repeal.

64
00:06:12.120 --> 00:06:19.160
He was not for making new laws, but for repealing old ones. It is most important to remember

65
00:06:19.160 --> 00:06:24.640
this. Wherever the Liberals saw a law which enhanced the State's coercive power over

66
00:06:24.640 --> 00:06:31.640
the citizen, he was for repealing it and leaving its place blank. There were many such laws

67
00:06:31.640 --> 00:06:37.120
on the British statute books, and when liberalism came into power, it repealed an immense grist

68
00:06:37.120 --> 00:06:45.080
Spenser must be left to describe in his own words, as he does in the course of this essay,

69
00:06:45.080 --> 00:06:50.560
how in the latter half of the last century British liberalism went over bodily to the

70
00:06:50.560 --> 00:06:57.520
philosophy of statism, and, abjuring the political method of repealing existing coercive measures,

71
00:06:57.520 --> 00:07:05.200
proceeded to outdo the Tories in constructing new coercive measures of ever-increasing particularity.

72
00:07:05.200 --> 00:07:10.200
This piece of British political history has great value for American readers because it

73
00:07:10.200 --> 00:07:17.440
enables them to see how closely American liberalism has followed the same course. It enables them

74
00:07:17.440 --> 00:07:23.520
to interpret correctly the significance of liberalism's influence upon the direction

75
00:07:23.520 --> 00:07:30.120
of our public life in the last half century, and to perceive just what it is to which that

76
00:07:30.120 --> 00:07:37.120
What influence has led, just what the consequences are, which that influence has tended to bring

77
00:07:37.120 --> 00:07:45.000
about, and just what are the further consequences which may be expected to ensue.

78
00:07:45.000 --> 00:07:51.160
For example, statism postulates the doctrine that the citizen has no rights, which the

79
00:07:51.160 --> 00:07:53.200
state is bound to respect.

80
00:07:53.200 --> 00:07:58.320
The only rights he has are those which the state grants him, and which the state may

81
00:07:58.320 --> 00:08:28.320
This doctrine is fundamental. Without its support, all the various nominal modes or forms of statism which we see at large in Europe and America, such as are called Socialism, Communism, Nazism, Fascism, etc., would collapse at once. The individualism which was professed by the early liberals maintained the contrary. It maintained that the citizen has rights which he or she is entitled to.

82
00:08:28.320 --> 00:08:33.640
which are inviolable by the State or by any other agency.

83
00:08:33.640 --> 00:08:40.040
This was fundamental doctrine. Without its support, obviously, every formulation of individualism

84
00:08:40.040 --> 00:08:48.360
becomes so much waste paper. Moreover, early liberalism accepted it as not only fundamental,

85
00:08:48.360 --> 00:08:56.640
but also axiomatic, self-evident. We may remember, for example, that our Great Charter, the Declaration

86
00:08:56.640 --> 00:09:02.800
of Independence takes as its foundation the self-evident truth of this doctrine, asserting

87
00:09:02.800 --> 00:09:09.200
that man, in virtue of his birth, is endowed with certain rights which are unalienable,

88
00:09:09.200 --> 00:09:14.880
and asserting further that it is to secure these rights that governments are instituted

89
00:09:14.880 --> 00:09:17.600
among men.

90
00:09:17.600 --> 00:09:23.600
Political literature will nowhere furnish a more explicit disavowal of the statist philosophy

91
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:30.160
than is to be found in the primary postulate of the Declaration.

92
00:09:30.160 --> 00:09:35.320
But now, in which direction has latter-day American liberalism tended?

93
00:09:35.320 --> 00:09:41.160
Has it tended towards an expanding regime of voluntary cooperation, or one of enforced

94
00:09:41.160 --> 00:09:43.400
cooperation?

95
00:09:43.400 --> 00:09:49.760
Have its efforts been directed consistently towards repealing existing measures of state

96
00:09:49.760 --> 00:09:55.720
Coercion, or towards the devising and promotion of new ones?

97
00:09:55.720 --> 00:10:01.720
Has it tended steadily to enlarge or to reduce the margin of existence within which the individual

98
00:10:01.720 --> 00:10:04.840
may act as he pleases?

99
00:10:04.840 --> 00:10:09.960
Has it contemplated state intervention upon the citizen at an ever-increasing number of

100
00:10:09.960 --> 00:10:13.800
points or at an ever-decreasing number?

101
00:10:13.800 --> 00:10:20.040
In short, has it consistently exhibited the philosophy of individualism, or the philosophy

102
00:10:20.040 --> 00:10:22.840
of statism?

103
00:10:22.840 --> 00:10:28.880
There can be but one answer, and the facts supporting it are so notorious that multiplying

104
00:10:28.880 --> 00:10:32.280
examples would be a waste of space.

105
00:10:32.280 --> 00:10:38.880
To take but a single one from among the most conspicuous, liberals worked hard, and successfully,

106
00:10:38.880 --> 00:10:44.320
to inject the principle of absolutism into the Constitution by means of the income tax

107
00:10:44.320 --> 00:10:51.680
amendment. Under that amendment, it is competent for Congress not only to confiscate the citizen's

108
00:10:51.680 --> 00:10:59.180
last penny, but also to levy punitive taxation, discriminatory taxation, taxation for the

109
00:10:59.180 --> 00:11:06.560
equalization of wealth, or for any other purpose it sees fit to promote. Hardly could a single

110
00:11:06.560 --> 00:11:13.560
Again, the present administration is made up of self-styled liberals, and its course has been a contentious triumphal advance of statism.

111
00:11:13.560 --> 00:11:17.400
which puts so formidable a mechanism in the hands of the state

112
00:11:17.400 --> 00:11:24.440
and gives the state carte blanche for its employment against its citizens.

113
00:11:24.440 --> 00:11:29.480
Again, the present administration is made up of self-styled liberals

114
00:11:29.480 --> 00:11:34.840
and its course has been a contentious triumphal advance of statism.

115
00:11:34.840 --> 00:11:38.840
In a preface to these essays written in 1884,

116
00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:43.080
Spencer has a paragraph which sums up with remarkable completeness

117
00:11:43.080 --> 00:11:47.000
The Political History of the United States during the last six years.

118
00:11:49.640 --> 00:11:55.160
Dictatorial measures rapidly multiplied have tended continually to narrow the liberties of

119
00:11:55.160 --> 00:12:01.320
individuals and have done this in a double way. Regulations have been made in yearly growing

120
00:12:01.320 --> 00:12:06.760
numbers, restraining the citizen in directions where his actions were previously unchecked

121
00:12:07.400 --> 00:12:12.040
and compelling actions which previously he might perform or not as he liked.

122
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:19.360
At the same time, heavier public burdens, chiefly local, have further restricted his

123
00:12:19.360 --> 00:12:25.860
freedom by lessening that portion of his earnings which he can spend as he pleases, and augmenting

124
00:12:25.860 --> 00:12:33.260
the portion taken from him to be spent as the public agents please.

125
00:12:33.260 --> 00:12:41.020
Thus closely has the course of American Statism from 1932 to 1939 followed the course of British

126
00:12:41.020 --> 00:12:45.740
Establish Statism from 1860 to 1884.

127
00:12:45.740 --> 00:12:50.140
Considering their professions of liberalism, it would be quite appropriate and by no means

128
00:12:50.140 --> 00:12:55.860
in our being to ask Mr. Roosevelt and his entourage whether they believe that the citizen

129
00:12:55.860 --> 00:13:00.260
has any rights which the State is bound to respect.

130
00:13:00.260 --> 00:13:06.620
Would they be willing, ex animo that is, and not for electioneering purposes, to subscribe

131
00:13:06.620 --> 00:13:11.460
to the Fundamental Doctrine of the Declaration.

132
00:13:11.460 --> 00:13:17.620
One would be unfeignedly surprised if they were, yet such an affirmation might go some

133
00:13:17.620 --> 00:13:24.140
way to clarify the distinction, if there actually be any, between the totalitarian statism of

134
00:13:24.140 --> 00:13:30.540
certain European countries and the democratic statism of Great Britain, France and the United

135
00:13:30.540 --> 00:13:32.660
States.

136
00:13:32.660 --> 00:13:37.300
It is commonly taken for granted that there is such a distinction, but those who assume

137
00:13:37.300 --> 00:13:43.260
this do not trouble themselves to show wherein the distinction consists, and to the disinterested

138
00:13:43.260 --> 00:13:50.500
observer the fact of its existence is, to say the least, not obvious.

139
00:13:50.500 --> 00:13:56.060
Spencer ends the new Taurism with a prediction which American readers today will find most

140
00:13:56.060 --> 00:14:10.060
The Laws Made by Liberals The Laws made by liberals are so greatly increasing

141
00:14:10.060 --> 00:14:15.700
the compulsions and restraints exercised over citizens that among conservatives who

142
00:14:15.700 --> 00:14:21.580
suffer from this aggressiveness there is growing upper tendency to resist it.

143
00:14:21.580 --> 00:14:26.980
The truth is furnished by the fact that the liberty and property defense league, largely

144
00:14:26.980 --> 00:14:35.780
consisting of conservatives, has taken for its motto individualism versus state socialism,

145
00:14:35.780 --> 00:14:41.700
so that, if the present drift of things continues, it may by and by really happen that the Tories

146
00:14:41.700 --> 00:14:48.340
will be defenders of liberties which the liberals, in pursuit of what they think popular welfare,

147
00:14:48.340 --> 00:14:51.560
trample underfoot.

148
00:14:51.560 --> 00:14:58.560
This prophecy has already been fulfilled in the United States.

149
00:14:59.820 --> 00:15:06.440
These essays following the New Tourism seem to require no special introduction or explanation.

150
00:15:06.440 --> 00:15:11.880
They are largely occupied with the various reasons why rapid social deterioration has

151
00:15:11.880 --> 00:15:18.420
ensued upon the progress of statism, and why, unless that progress be checked, there must

152
00:15:18.420 --> 00:15:24.020
must ensue further steady deterioration ending in disintegration.

153
00:15:24.020 --> 00:15:29.060
All the American reader need do as he goes through these essays is to draw a continuous

154
00:15:29.060 --> 00:15:34.940
parallel with statism's progress in the United States and to remark at every page the force

155
00:15:34.940 --> 00:15:40.940
and accuracy of Spencer's forecast as borne out by the unbroken sequence of events since

156
00:15:40.940 --> 00:15:43.520
his essays were written.

157
00:15:43.520 --> 00:15:49.320
The reader can see plainly what that sequence has run up to in England, a condition in which

158
00:15:49.320 --> 00:15:55.080
social power has been so far confiscated and converted into state power that there is now

159
00:15:55.080 --> 00:16:01.840
not enough of it left to pay the state's bills, and in which by necessary consequence the

160
00:16:01.840 --> 00:16:08.840
citizen is on a footing of complete and adject state slavery. The reader will also perceive

161
00:16:08.840 --> 00:16:15.840
The people would believe, what he has no doubt already suspected, that this condition now existing in England is one for which there is apparently no hell.

162
00:16:15.840 --> 00:16:26.840
Even a successful revolution, if such a thing were conceivable, against the military tyranny which is statism's last expedient, would accomplish nothing.

163
00:16:26.840 --> 00:16:33.840
The people would be as thoroughly indoctrinated with statism after the revolution as they were before,

164
00:16:33.840 --> 00:16:40.840
There have been many revolutions in the last twenty-five years, and this has been the sum of their history. They amount to no more than an impressive testimony to the great truth that there can be no right action except there be right thinking behind it.

165
00:16:40.840 --> 00:16:43.920
and would gain nothing but a mere change of oppressors.

166
00:16:43.920 --> 00:16:50.240
There have been many revolutions in the last twenty-five years, and this has been the sum

167
00:16:50.240 --> 00:16:52.080
of their history.

168
00:16:52.080 --> 00:16:57.280
They amount to no more than an impressive testimony to the great truth that there can

169
00:16:57.280 --> 00:17:02.840
be no right action except there be right thinking behind it.

170
00:17:02.840 --> 00:17:08.520
As long as the easy, attractive, superficial philosophy of statism remains in control of

171
00:17:08.520 --> 00:17:23.440
The Reader may be left to construct for himself whatever conclusions he sees fit concerning

172
00:17:23.440 --> 00:17:29.720
conditions now prevailing in the United States, and to make what inferences he thinks reasonable

173
00:17:29.720 --> 00:17:35.800
concerning those to which they would naturally be leading. It seems highly probable that

174
00:17:35.800 --> 00:17:41.840
But these essays will be of great help to him, greater help perhaps than any other single

175
00:17:41.840 --> 00:17:45.640
work that could be put before him.

176
00:17:45.640 --> 00:17:53.440
Albert J. Nock, Narragansett, Rhode Island, 25th October, 1939