WEBVTT

NOTE Five Ways Government Grows, and What the Mises Institute is Doing About It

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:30.000
Thanks for everybody to come. It's great to be in Houston, and what I'm told is typical weather, so it's, no, but I had the pleasure of, the honor of working for Ron Paul, who I might mention is in fact what he seems to be, unlike all those other guys in Washington, spent a lot of time in Houston, mainly in the summertime, so that was different. And of course the city is entirely different every time I come back, so that's great capitalist enterprise.

2
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:33.600
James said I'm going to talk today about the state and its five rationales.

3
00:00:33.600 --> 00:00:40.040
If you say that government is too big and truly overweening, you elicit a surprising

4
00:00:40.040 --> 00:00:46.400
degree of agreement among people, even mainstream columnists, economists and nearly everyone.

5
00:00:46.400 --> 00:00:51.280
Even government employees, who famously resent their bosses, might be quick to agree.

6
00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:57.760
If you hang out outside the offices of the IRS in Washington, D.C., in the park at noontime

7
00:00:57.760 --> 00:01:07.760
In a time where its employees routinely take their lunch, you'll get an earful of vitriol against the bureaucracy that you wouldn't hear outside 1990s militia circles.

8
00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:12.760
Incidentally, the government is having a terrible time recruiting employees.

9
00:01:12.760 --> 00:01:18.760
Only 16% of college-educated workers say they have any interest whatsoever in a government job.

10
00:01:18.760 --> 00:01:22.760
Among those without a college degree, there's twice that level of interest.

11
00:01:22.760 --> 00:01:29.760
Among people currently employed, those with managerial or professional occupations show a low interest rate of 17%.

12
00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:36.760
Among those who want their work to be challenging and enjoyable, 9% thought a government job might qualify.

13
00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:49.760
And interestingly, those who say they want to make a contribution to society, 90% said that non-government work in the private sector with for-profit or non-profit organizations is the way to go.

14
00:01:49.760 --> 00:02:01.760
Now what this means is that the smart set avoids government. Government work still might be attractive to people with fewer economic opportunities, but they're entering for reasons that are not ideological.

15
00:02:01.760 --> 00:02:08.760
And for that reason too, they're less loyal to the public sector and glad to bail out if something else becomes available.

16
00:02:08.760 --> 00:02:14.760
Now most people view this as a very bad trend. I would only say it's a very significant trend.

17
00:02:14.760 --> 00:02:20.760
It's always a tragedy to see smart and entrepreneurial men and women be attracted away from productive employment in the private sector towards a position of power in the public sector.

18
00:02:44.760 --> 00:02:50.760
It makes us poorer to have talents drawn away from wealth creation towards wealth destruction.

19
00:02:50.760 --> 00:02:56.760
As for the very few good people in politics, Ron Paul being the shining exception that proves the rule,

20
00:02:56.760 --> 00:03:03.760
they are true public servants only insofar as they work to diminish government power rather than increase it.

21
00:03:03.760 --> 00:03:10.760
So long as government is large and overweening, we're better off with a public sector that cannot attract the best and the brightest.

22
00:03:10.760 --> 00:03:18.760
and the brightest. They should stay put right where they are and continue to expand the range of goods and services offered within the market framework.

23
00:03:18.760 --> 00:03:28.760
It is the market, after all, that provides us the means necessary to improve our standard of living and the tools we need to maintain some degree of independence from the state.

24
00:03:28.760 --> 00:03:38.760
We often rail against incompetence in government, but before we go too far with that language, we need to consider that competence in government may be a far worse fate.

25
00:03:38.760 --> 00:03:45.160
We don't need genuinely competent antitrust enforcers, drug and food regulators, tax collectors,

26
00:03:45.160 --> 00:03:50.240
money manipulators, labor law interventionists, gun grabbers and environmental police.

27
00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:57.800
As H.L. Mencken said, we should be grateful we don't get all the government we pay for.

28
00:03:57.800 --> 00:04:02.600
To be sure, we're paying far more today for government than ever before.

29
00:04:02.600 --> 00:04:07.000
Consider the real annual growth rate of total government outlays by president.

30
00:04:07.000 --> 00:04:15.400
Under Nixon it was 3%, under Carter 4.1%, under Reagan 2.6%, under Bush's dad 1.9%,

31
00:04:15.400 --> 00:04:20.120
but that was because of the cuts in military spending at the end of the Cold War, his domestic

32
00:04:20.120 --> 00:04:21.840
spending soared.

33
00:04:21.840 --> 00:04:27.560
Under Clinton, whom we all denounce as a socialist, it was 1.5%, the lowest rate in the post-war

34
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:28.560
period.

35
00:04:28.560 --> 00:04:33.500
And under the present Bush, who promised less government, the real annual growth rate of

36
00:04:33.500 --> 00:04:39.940
Total Government Outlays has been 5% which compares to LBJ era spending.

37
00:04:39.940 --> 00:04:44.260
The old rationales for government growth may have been discredited in the public mind but

38
00:04:44.260 --> 00:04:48.740
they're alive in Washington among the special interest groups and among the media and I'd

39
00:04:48.740 --> 00:04:51.500
like to identify the main ones.

40
00:04:51.500 --> 00:04:53.700
Rational number one, the Good Samaritan State.

41
00:04:53.700 --> 00:04:57.860
In this view of government the state should act like the third person to come upon the

42
00:04:57.860 --> 00:05:00.600
poor man who had been beaten and robbed.

43
00:05:00.600 --> 00:05:06.400
They imagine a population of people that is divided among three types. Victims, victimizers,

44
00:05:06.400 --> 00:05:11.200
and those who refuse to help. The victim classes we know all too well because the litany is

45
00:05:11.200 --> 00:05:16.840
set again and again within the structure of labor law. The elderly, the young, ethnic

46
00:05:16.840 --> 00:05:21.400
and racial minorities, religious minorities, sexual minorities, the physically and mentally

47
00:05:21.400 --> 00:05:28.060
disabled, workers, the underpaid, people in rural areas, those who deal with urban overcrowding,

48
00:05:28.060 --> 00:05:33.140
People who breathe dirty air or eat chemically produced products, artists, the manufacturing

49
00:05:33.140 --> 00:05:41.660
industry, people with peanut allergies, the dyslexic, short people, fat people, the leisure

50
00:05:41.660 --> 00:05:46.060
deprived, and I probably left out about a hundred other groups.

51
00:05:46.060 --> 00:05:53.260
Among the victimizers we have a similar list, capitalists, racial and ethnic majorities,

52
00:05:53.260 --> 00:06:11.260
The sexual majorities, the overpaid, managers and CEOs, people who live in gated communities, the well-armed, consumers of cell phones, owners of mines, anyone living off a trust fund, fully abled men and anyone who resents social managers telling them what to do.

53
00:06:11.260 --> 00:06:18.260
In the view of those who advocate the Samaritan state, these two classes of victims and victimizers are constantly at war.

54
00:06:18.260 --> 00:06:23.260
There is nothing but conflict between them. The loss of one is the gain of the other.

55
00:06:23.260 --> 00:06:32.260
These categories are fixed and unchanging. The lack of harmony of interests is built into the structure of the social and economic world.

56
00:06:32.260 --> 00:06:39.260
The remedy requires an institution that is relentlessly engaged in reweighing the power relationships between these two groups.

57
00:06:39.260 --> 00:06:45.260
The conflict cannot be finally ended, but justice requires that the victims are given an unending stream of compensation

58
00:06:45.260 --> 00:06:49.260
and that the victimizers are treated with disdain and punished for their very existence.

59
00:06:49.260 --> 00:06:55.260
Social justice thus requires that victimizers are reduced, disabled, denounced and spat upon,

60
00:06:55.260 --> 00:07:00.260
while the victims must be exalted, fed, clothed, funded and made whole.

61
00:07:00.260 --> 00:07:05.260
This is how the left, broadly speaking, thinks the world works and should work.

62
00:07:05.260 --> 00:07:10.260
It doesn't matter whether one considers oneself a hard Marxist or a soft Social Democrat.

63
00:07:10.260 --> 00:07:14.260
The intellectual tie that binds them together is the view that conflict and not cooperation,

64
00:07:14.260 --> 00:07:21.260
and cooperation characterize the work of society in absence of an institution dedicated to bringing about social justice.

65
00:07:21.260 --> 00:07:25.260
The institutional answer is, of course, the state.

66
00:07:25.260 --> 00:07:30.260
The state is the Samaritan, who lifts up and exalts the meek, smites the proud and the powerful,

67
00:07:30.260 --> 00:07:33.260
who would otherwise walk right past the poor person on the street,

68
00:07:33.260 --> 00:07:38.260
who is the very archetype of the victim in the leftist view of how the world works.

69
00:07:38.260 --> 00:07:41.260
But there are many things wrong with this view of society.

70
00:07:41.260 --> 00:07:44.300
In the parable, after all, the victim was beaten and robbed.

71
00:07:44.460 --> 00:07:47.660
He was exploited only in a very narrow and old-fashioned sense.

72
00:07:47.820 --> 00:07:50.420
His person and property were violated.

73
00:07:50.580 --> 00:07:52.900
These are crimes against libertarian ethics,

74
00:07:53.060 --> 00:07:57.260
a system of thought that mirrors what every religious and ethical system has always taught.

75
00:07:57.420 --> 00:08:00.100
Do not kill, do not steal.

76
00:08:00.260 --> 00:08:05.100
In other words, he was not a victim of some hazy notion of social injustice.

77
00:08:05.260 --> 00:08:08.860
He was not discriminated against, exploited by an employer,

78
00:08:08.860 --> 00:08:12.860
made to work long hours or denied a comfy living in his old age.

79
00:08:12.860 --> 00:08:15.860
There's a huge difference between being beaten and robbed

80
00:08:15.860 --> 00:08:18.860
and having to pay high prices for prescription drugs.

81
00:08:18.860 --> 00:08:22.860
The great error of the left is its inability to distinguish the injustice of violence

82
00:08:22.860 --> 00:08:26.860
from the supposed injustice of inequality of material conditions.

83
00:08:26.860 --> 00:08:31.860
As for the Samaritan, he was not acting as an agent of the regime.

84
00:08:31.860 --> 00:08:33.860
He used his own money to help the victim.

85
00:08:33.860 --> 00:08:37.860
He got him back on his feet and paid his bills at the private clinic

86
00:08:37.860 --> 00:08:44.100
The Samaritan did not rob someone else to give money to the man on the street. He presumably

87
00:08:44.100 --> 00:08:49.540
got his money justly by hard work and investment. He had no desire to keep the man dependent

88
00:08:49.540 --> 00:08:55.100
nor to exercise power over him, tax him, regulate him or send him to war.

89
00:08:55.100 --> 00:08:59.660
The state is something very different. It has no income but that which it robs from

90
00:08:59.660 --> 00:09:05.260
someone else. It seeks its own gain at others' expense. It protects itself and promotes itself

91
00:09:05.260 --> 00:09:09.460
before the interest of everyone else. It's beholden to special interests who create and

92
00:09:09.460 --> 00:09:14.980
control this regulatory apparatus. It is not impartial. It sides with its friends over

93
00:09:14.980 --> 00:09:19.980
its perceived enemies. Moreover, the state is an exploiter, a murderer, a violator of

94
00:09:19.980 --> 00:09:24.680
human rights. The typical response of the left is to say that they want a state that

95
00:09:24.680 --> 00:09:30.460
only does good things, such as share and care, and not bad things, such as steal and kill.

96
00:09:30.460 --> 00:09:34.900
But this cannot be. We might as well wish for a lion that only purrs and cuddles, or

97
00:09:34.900 --> 00:09:40.900
The State is a rattlesnake that only provides percussive accompaniment to mariachi music.

98
00:09:40.900 --> 00:09:46.900
The very nature of the State is that it exists only through and for compulsion.

99
00:09:46.900 --> 00:09:50.900
To imagine otherwise is not to face reality.

100
00:09:50.900 --> 00:09:53.900
Rational number two, the Solomonic State.

101
00:09:53.900 --> 00:09:55.900
In the Bible we're told that King Solomon had, quote,

102
00:09:55.900 --> 00:10:00.900
understanding exceeding much and largeness of heart, even as that is sent, excuse me,

103
00:10:00.900 --> 00:10:03.900
even as the sand on the seashore.

104
00:10:03.900 --> 00:10:07.240
His wisdom excelled the wisdom of all the children of the East Country, and all the

105
00:10:07.240 --> 00:10:12.840
wisdom of Egypt. He was wiser than all men, and his fame was in all nations round about.

106
00:10:12.840 --> 00:10:17.380
He spoke three thousand proverbs, and his songs were a thousand and five. He spoke of

107
00:10:17.380 --> 00:10:21.860
trees from the cedar trees that is in Lebanon, even unto the hyssop that springeth out of

108
00:10:21.860 --> 00:10:26.260
the wall. He spoke also of beasts, and of fowls, and of creeping things, and of fishes.

109
00:10:26.260 --> 00:10:30.700
And there came of all people to hear the wisdom of Solomon, from all kings of the earth, who

110
00:10:30.700 --> 00:10:41.700
I'm not here to dispute the Bible's account of Solomon's wisdom, but I would suggest that these traits are not generalizable to the population of rulers.

111
00:10:41.700 --> 00:10:52.700
In fact, it's very dangerous to hope that they may be. If we set out to find such a person and have fantastic power available to him when we believe he has arrived, we've set up a framework for tyranny.

112
00:10:52.700 --> 00:11:05.700
The framers knew that no man can be trusted with power. They attempted to construct a system that presumed that all men were corruptible, and that there would be some means to dislodge them if the corruption were shown.

113
00:11:05.700 --> 00:11:18.700
Still today many people long for the Solomonic state as a means of dispensing justice. Unlike the Samaritan model, the goal here is not charity, but the just wielding of the sword on behalf of the right and true.

114
00:11:18.700 --> 00:11:29.700
Thus we should seek out righteous men of learning and moral character who know what evil is and have the courage to stand up and destroy it. This model is what inspires this mentality.

115
00:11:29.700 --> 00:11:45.700
There are many problems with this model. One man might be very wise, even the wisest of all men, but as F.I. Hayek might remind us, all the accumulated knowledge in the head of one person is still infinitesimal as compared with the wisdom that emerges through social cooperation in the marketplace.

116
00:11:45.700 --> 00:11:59.700
We can consider the price of any good on the market as it stands right now and know that this one price results from the accumulated decisions of millions of people across thousands and thousands of sectors of economic activity spread throughout the world.

117
00:11:59.700 --> 00:12:05.700
The knowledge is dispersed in a million directions and results from small decisions and actions by economic actors.

118
00:12:05.700 --> 00:12:12.700
But the result is a single indicator that assists in allocating resources better than any single mind could ever do.

119
00:12:12.700 --> 00:12:26.700
The model of the Solomonic State also imagines that somehow the social order we see around us cannot possibly have come about without a single will operating in society, some iron hand that has designed the order and keeps it running smoothly.

120
00:12:26.700 --> 00:12:38.700
People who think this way imagine that in the absence of this firm hand there would be nothing but a Hobbesian state of nature, where society would be a war of all against all and life nasty, Buddhist and short.

121
00:12:38.700 --> 00:12:49.700
Our age is notably lacking in the likes of Solomon, and so those who fear the Hobbesian state of nature turn to the managerial state to act wisely in the interest of justice and order at home and abroad.

122
00:12:49.700 --> 00:12:55.700
They might not always like what the rulers do, but they consider the alternative to despotism more fearsome.

123
00:12:55.700 --> 00:13:01.700
They warn about the dread results of anarchism and liberty, where people senselessly kill and rob without consequence.

124
00:13:01.700 --> 00:13:05.700
They fear this liberty more than they fear the abuses of power.

125
00:13:05.700 --> 00:13:11.340
and Power. This, I submit, is the mentality of many conservatives and many on the right.

126
00:13:11.340 --> 00:13:16.940
We see it in the affections for Bush, the Patriot Act, the war on terror, and how quickly

127
00:13:16.940 --> 00:13:22.140
people fall for any leader who uses Manichean rhetoric in defense of the latest nationalistic

128
00:13:22.140 --> 00:13:27.340
crusade. What these people need more than anything else is a familiarity with the insights

129
00:13:27.340 --> 00:13:34.020
of the old liberal tradition, as represented by Jefferson, Bastiat, Mises, Hayek and Rothbard.

130
00:13:34.020 --> 00:13:38.420
They need to come to see how order is not the mother of liberty, but its daughter.

131
00:13:38.420 --> 00:13:42.460
They need to see how society is harmonious, not because of the state, but because of the

132
00:13:42.460 --> 00:13:46.680
prevalence of human cooperation in the marketplace, where people work to trade to their

133
00:13:46.680 --> 00:13:49.260
own mutual betterment.

134
00:13:49.260 --> 00:13:53.660
People who fail to understand this become the unwitting servants of tyranny, particularly

135
00:13:53.660 --> 00:13:59.980
in this modern age, when it is so obviously not wise, but stupid and violent and presumptuous.

136
00:13:59.980 --> 00:14:04.700
They imagine that the state can possess a god-like power and bring justice and order, but they

137
00:14:04.700 --> 00:14:09.580
end up only empowering the worst elements of society, bringing injustice and chaos.

138
00:14:09.580 --> 00:14:14.960
Now, you might say the old liberal view of society is naive. It might be in people's

139
00:14:14.960 --> 00:14:20.620
interest to learn to trade rather than steal, but we live in a fallen world. If it were

140
00:14:20.620 --> 00:14:24.820
not for some overarching controlling force, people would loot each other relentingly and

141
00:14:24.820 --> 00:14:41.000
History is strewn with examples. The question we have to ask ourselves is whether a society

142
00:14:41.000 --> 00:14:45.740
that fails to learn the art of civilization will erect and sustain a state that will impose

143
00:14:45.740 --> 00:14:50.580
civilization on the people. I submit that history also teaches that when a people are

144
00:14:50.580 --> 00:14:54.580
The more brutal and uncivilized the state is even more so.

145
00:14:54.580 --> 00:14:58.580
The state is rarely and maybe never better than the people it rules.

146
00:14:58.580 --> 00:15:01.580
In fact, it is almost always worse.

147
00:15:01.580 --> 00:15:04.580
Rationale number three, log rolling.

148
00:15:04.580 --> 00:15:10.580
Given these two very different conceptions of the state, one favoring the welfare state, the other favoring a warfare state,

149
00:15:10.580 --> 00:15:14.580
why don't the visions cancel each other out?

150
00:15:14.580 --> 00:15:18.580
So intense is the desire of one group to have the state that it wants

151
00:15:18.580 --> 00:15:23.380
that it's willing to put up with another group's desire for its conception of the state.

152
00:15:23.380 --> 00:15:27.660
The two conceptions decide to cooperate. An erectus state purports to behave both like

153
00:15:27.660 --> 00:15:32.740
Solomon and like the Samaritan. That is the origin of the guns and butter state, or the

154
00:15:32.740 --> 00:15:37.460
welfare warfare state, the modern state as we know it, one that purports to meet our

155
00:15:37.460 --> 00:15:39.700
every need.

156
00:15:39.700 --> 00:15:44.420
We see how this log rolling works every day on Capitol Hill. One group wants more money

157
00:15:44.420 --> 00:15:49.980
for Tanks and Weaponry. The other wants more for Medicaid and education. If both agree

158
00:15:49.980 --> 00:15:54.320
that politics is the art of compromise, they will put up with the other groups' priorities

159
00:15:54.320 --> 00:15:58.140
in order that their own vision can be fulfilled.

160
00:15:58.140 --> 00:16:02.360
On the right, we find that the love for the police power is more intense than the hatred

161
00:16:02.360 --> 00:16:07.000
of redistribution. On the left, we find that the love for redistribution is more intense

162
00:16:07.000 --> 00:16:11.920
than the hatred of war and the Leviathan. They therefore work together to erect a massive

163
00:16:11.920 --> 00:16:17.320
of an ever-growing executive. They're similarly unwilling to oppose the state in total. They

164
00:16:17.320 --> 00:16:22.760
fear that in doing so, the state as an institution would be discredited, and their conception

165
00:16:22.760 --> 00:16:28.840
of what the state should do along with it. Neither side particularly loves big government,

166
00:16:28.840 --> 00:16:33.560
but both sides agree that it is better than the alternative of letting people alone. So

167
00:16:33.560 --> 00:16:37.400
their log world will support the public sector, even when it means that they must sleep with

168
00:16:37.400 --> 00:16:42.400
and Their Political Enemies, Rationale No. 4, The Inflationary State.

169
00:16:42.400 --> 00:16:46.400
Now we come to the reason the system is able to perpetuate itself.

170
00:16:46.400 --> 00:16:49.400
And there is something of a mystery to explain here.

171
00:16:49.400 --> 00:16:54.400
No people anywhere will put up with a leviathan that grows and grows forever.

172
00:16:54.400 --> 00:17:01.400
At some point, the problem of funding state expansion will result in too much violence against property and people will revolt.

173
00:17:01.400 --> 00:17:13.400
Indeed, I would think if the federal government had to collect all its revenue through a tax of any kind, levied right now against the public, it would spark a tax revolt on a scale never before seen in modern history.

174
00:17:13.400 --> 00:17:20.400
Thus do we have the central bank to create money for the state. Thus do we have paper money that can be created in unlimited quantities.

175
00:17:20.400 --> 00:17:27.400
Thus do we have deposit insurance to make banks failure-proof so the masses will never doubt that the credit pyramid is eternal.

176
00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:33.400
Thus do we have the Feds' power to manipulate interest rates and control the flow of credit to the system.

177
00:17:33.400 --> 00:17:37.400
An economist at Lehman Brothers recently sent us an interesting chart.

178
00:17:37.400 --> 00:17:41.400
It compares the level of price increases across many Fed regimes.

179
00:17:41.400 --> 00:17:46.400
Under the first Fed governor, Charles Hamlin, the dollar declined 8% in value.

180
00:17:46.400 --> 00:17:51.400
Under Thomas B. McCabe from the late 1940s, it declined 7.2%.

181
00:17:51.400 --> 00:18:10.400
On Arthur Burns, wholly owned by President Nixon, the dollar declined 42% in value. Under Volcker, Mr. Tight Money, it fell 40%. And under Greenspan, who has a reputation as a great inflation fighter, the value of the dollar in terms of goods and services fell fully 44%.

182
00:18:10.400 --> 00:18:19.400
Inflation serves the cause of the state by giving it room to run up debts without limit and fund its activities without making the people cough up more revenue.

183
00:18:19.400 --> 00:18:24.400
Indeed, that is the primary purpose of the inflationary state.

184
00:18:24.400 --> 00:18:27.400
People often say to me that a gold standard is impractical.

185
00:18:27.400 --> 00:18:29.400
In fact, that is not the case.

186
00:18:29.400 --> 00:18:31.400
It is very practical.

187
00:18:31.400 --> 00:18:33.400
It is the free market answer.

188
00:18:33.400 --> 00:18:38.400
The state doesn't need to produce money any more than it needs to produce shoes or shirts or clocks.

189
00:18:38.400 --> 00:18:45.400
The problem is that we lack the political will to stop the inflation monster because too many people benefit from it.

190
00:18:45.400 --> 00:18:48.400
Rationale number five, the propaganda state.

191
00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:55.400
In every society, control of the society's educational institutions increases in tandem with the rise of the state.

192
00:18:55.400 --> 00:19:02.400
This is because the state needs these institutions to inculcate the civic religion of loving the public enterprise.

193
00:19:02.400 --> 00:19:08.400
And also because the less people know about the idea of liberty, the more the state is provided room to grow.

194
00:19:08.400 --> 00:19:10.400
Consider the Department of Education.

195
00:19:10.400 --> 00:19:16.400
Ever since its creation, every Republican administration has come to power with promises to abolish it.

196
00:19:16.400 --> 00:19:21.400
But once they get in power, they find that the bureaucracy has its uses.

197
00:19:21.400 --> 00:19:26.400
Instead of cutting or abolishing it, they increase the agency and give it more to do.

198
00:19:26.400 --> 00:19:32.400
The more the state does, the more the state needs to control public opinion by controlling the schools.

199
00:19:32.400 --> 00:19:39.400
Now, there's a point of optimism here. If any state could rule without propaganda, it surely would do so.

200
00:19:39.400 --> 00:19:45.400
Why then do states find educational control and the propagation of the civic religion in its interests?

201
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:53.400
Because at some level, every state, in all times and in all places, is required to seek the tacit consent of those they govern.

202
00:19:53.400 --> 00:19:58.400
No state can control a society by use of the sword alone and only.

203
00:19:58.400 --> 00:20:03.400
It must also seek some degree of ideological conformity with its own goals.

204
00:20:03.400 --> 00:20:07.400
Otherwise its rule becomes threatened and destabilized.

205
00:20:07.400 --> 00:20:14.400
The other side of the coin is that states can indeed be destabilized by the ultimate counterrevolutionary tactic

206
00:20:14.400 --> 00:20:18.920
tactic, providing alternative sources of education.

207
00:20:18.920 --> 00:20:22.360
As Mises said, all of history is a battle for liberty.

208
00:20:22.360 --> 00:20:25.800
Where the ideas of freedom are triumphant, liberty prevails.

209
00:20:25.800 --> 00:20:28.640
Where the ideas of freedom are buried and suppressed,

210
00:20:28.640 --> 00:20:31.080
despotism prevails.

211
00:20:31.080 --> 00:20:32.960
So our pathway is clear.

212
00:20:32.960 --> 00:20:35.360
It's a choice of the Mises Institute

213
00:20:35.360 --> 00:20:37.880
not to mix in the mire of a political system that

214
00:20:37.880 --> 00:20:40.520
is wholly owned or to attempt to seek favor

215
00:20:40.520 --> 00:20:42.760
from influential opinion makers.

216
00:20:42.760 --> 00:20:52.760
Our path is one of education, pursued with high ideals, advanced using the most modern methods, and animated by the spirit of guerrilla warfare.

217
00:20:52.760 --> 00:21:04.760
There are Misesians and Rothbardians strewn throughout the academic world, the financial and banking houses, law firms, and in every walk of life, not only in this country, but all over the world.

218
00:21:04.760 --> 00:21:11.760
At the Institute we've worked for nearly a quarter of a century on a very radical project of advancing economic science and logic.

219
00:21:11.760 --> 00:21:16.160
We have pushed to keep the fire of freedom burning brightly. We have sought to teach

220
00:21:16.160 --> 00:21:20.720
anyone and everyone about the workings and benefits of liberty. We have come under pressure

221
00:21:20.720 --> 00:21:25.920
from the left, the right and the center, yet the attention given to the body of ideas grows

222
00:21:25.920 --> 00:21:32.280
day by day. We can prevail against the propaganda state. So long as we are free to do so and

223
00:21:32.280 --> 00:21:37.440
have the means available, we will continue to do so. This is our weapon against power.

224
00:21:37.440 --> 00:21:42.080
It is the most effective weapon anyone could ever possess, and if we win this victory,

225
00:21:42.080 --> 00:21:44.800
we win all others.

226
00:21:44.800 --> 00:21:50.280
Thanks to all of you for supporting the ideals, for supporting the Mises Institute with contributions

227
00:21:50.280 --> 00:21:54.960
and moral support, and for being part of a revolutionary vanguard that sees through the

228
00:21:54.960 --> 00:22:00.800
errors of our day and imagines a brighter future of freedom, private property and peace.
