WEBVTT

NOTE How the Private Bankers Are Using the Financial Crisis to Reshape World Government

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
Well, I don't know about you guys, but I was feeling very chipper this morning, and then I heard Doug French talk about the real estate market.

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:12.000
We were both part of the high school seminar, whatever you want to call it, yesterday, like he mentioned,

3
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:18.000
and I just saw him start rattling off those statistics about foreclosures and just suck the life out of those young kids.

4
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:26.000
For those who are curious, Doug is available for birthdays and bar mitzvahs, if you ever want to have him come do that.

5
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:30.680
So let me just acknowledge, I have a bit of a difficult task here. So my topic, if you

6
00:00:30.680 --> 00:00:35.160
just think about this, if you just said this to a random person, I'm supposed to talk about

7
00:00:35.160 --> 00:00:40.480
how the private bankers are using the financial crisis to reshape world government. Now that's

8
00:00:40.480 --> 00:00:43.880
not the kind of thesis that you do if you're trying to get a top spot at Harvard, you want

9
00:00:43.880 --> 00:00:47.720
to be appointed out of the Federal Reserve. That's kind of a, it makes you sound like

10
00:00:47.720 --> 00:00:52.540
a nut job. I actually was going to try to come here with a tin foil hat, but I was afraid

11
00:00:52.540 --> 00:00:55.280
that I wouldn't get through security at the airport with that. I was thinking maybe I

12
00:00:55.280 --> 00:01:14.280
The Mises Institute is a crazy organization, but we're actually pretty moderate. Whenever we run articles, we get emails from people calling us sell-outs. We're afraid to tell the truth on this sort of stuff.

13
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:44.280
So here I'm sort of skirting a fine line, I'm going to try to tell you things that are accurate, but yet also not, you know, let's make it sound like we're a bunch of paranoid conspiracy theorists, but some of this stuff really is sort of crazy, so in terms of, you know, balancing that act, I'm going to first talk about more theoretical things, just give you the theory as to why what's been happening over in Europe in particular, and what central banks have been doing in response, why that's just wrong theoretically, and then after that I'll give you some real world anecdotes just to

14
00:01:44.280 --> 00:01:51.300
To show you where these people are coming from who are very suspicious about what's happening. It seems like certain powerful people are

15
00:01:52.680 --> 00:02:00.100
Steering events if you will to benefit them and it's not the average person holding currency or the average taxpayer who's benefiting from all this

16
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:06.240
So the the way to start this is to talk about the European Union and the euro

17
00:02:06.240 --> 00:02:10.120
So those were founded by a treaty back in 1992

18
00:02:10.120 --> 00:02:23.120
The E.U., that's when all the groundwork was laid in and then over time they first introduced it in terms of large transactions and then it was phased in so that people with their day-to-day currency in Europe then turned that in and it was replaced with Euros.

19
00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:37.120
And when they did that, it wasn't, they didn't know which countries were going to be able to participate so they set out criteria which were called convergence criteria for what a country had to do to be able to join the E.U. or to be able to use the Euro as its currency.

20
00:02:37.120 --> 00:02:42.120
So I'm not going to read all this stuff, but let me just summarize some of these key requirements.

21
00:02:42.120 --> 00:02:50.120
So as far as the country's inflation rate, it said that no more than 1.5 percentage points higher than the average of the three best performing,

22
00:02:50.120 --> 00:02:53.120
meaning the lowest inflation member states of the EU.

23
00:02:53.120 --> 00:02:57.120
So just to translate that, it meant some new state wants to come in and join,

24
00:02:57.120 --> 00:03:05.120
then its inflation rate can't be more than 1.5 points higher than the three lowest inflation ones of the currently existing members.

25
00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:11.120
As far as the government's finances, they had a rule about the country that wants to come in its deficit.

26
00:03:11.120 --> 00:03:17.120
It said that it couldn't exceed 3% of GDP at the end of the preceding fiscal year.

27
00:03:17.120 --> 00:03:23.120
So if you ran a deficit that was greater than 3% of your country's output, you weren't eligible to come in.

28
00:03:23.120 --> 00:03:28.120
You said maybe in the future you could, but you had to get your affairs in order first before they'd consider letting you in.

29
00:03:28.120 --> 00:03:34.120
As far as the country's overall debt, it couldn't exceed 60% of GDP at the end of the preceding fiscal year.

30
00:03:34.120 --> 00:03:49.120
As far as the exchange rate, long-term interest rates, the candidate country's nominal long-term interest rate couldn't be more than two percentage points higher than the three lowest inflation member states.

31
00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:55.120
These were a bunch of criteria they had to make sure, and you say, well, why do they have this?

32
00:03:55.120 --> 00:04:00.120
Well, because they wanted to make sure they didn't get a very irresponsible country coming in.

33
00:04:00.120 --> 00:04:04.120
So now you want to understand, what's the theory behind this?

34
00:04:04.120 --> 00:04:08.120
Let me just back up a minute and tell you the theory of why do they have a euro in the first place?

35
00:04:08.120 --> 00:04:10.120
What were they hoping to achieve?

36
00:04:10.120 --> 00:04:16.120
Well, a big part of the story is that the people in Europe were sort of looking with envy at the United States.

37
00:04:16.120 --> 00:04:24.120
The United States is a very powerful country economically, and they were trying to figure out these technocratic mainstream economists

38
00:04:24.120 --> 00:04:28.120
were trying to understand what is it about the U.S. that makes them such an economic powerhouse?

39
00:04:28.120 --> 00:04:58.120
How come over the decades, they were consistently, had a better economy, stronger economy than Europe did collectively, and they said one of the things is the US has a unified currency, right, just the dollars over the whole US, over all the states, whereas in Europe, before the Euro, you know, they had each country had its own currency, so why is that a problem? Well, there's lots of things, but for example, suppose there's a company that's based in France, and then it has maybe a factory in Italy, you know, employing Italian workers,

40
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:01.520
and they use machine parts that are produced in Germany

41
00:05:01.520 --> 00:05:05.600
but they sell to the market, to French consumers

42
00:05:05.600 --> 00:05:09.200
so you can see there's at least three different currencies going on there, you know, the lira

43
00:05:09.200 --> 00:05:12.760
the french franc and the deutsch mark and so when that company is just making

44
00:05:12.760 --> 00:05:16.360
projections and figuring out, you know, signing long-term labor contracts with the

45
00:05:16.360 --> 00:05:16.920
people

46
00:05:16.920 --> 00:05:21.280
what did I say, in Italy and buying the machine parts from Germany and then selling to the

47
00:05:21.280 --> 00:05:22.400
French consumers

48
00:05:22.400 --> 00:05:25.680
beyond all the other stuff that you need to worry about about just

49
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:27.680
You know, is this going to beat our competitors?

50
00:05:27.680 --> 00:05:31.680
Are we pricing appropriately for what the consumers want to pay?

51
00:05:31.680 --> 00:05:34.680
Are we paying too much in pension for our workers?

52
00:05:34.680 --> 00:05:37.680
Besides all of that stuff that any business has to worry about,

53
00:05:37.680 --> 00:05:40.680
they also have to worry about currency movements.

54
00:05:40.680 --> 00:05:42.680
And sure, you can hedge yourself and do things like that,

55
00:05:42.680 --> 00:05:47.680
but you can just see how that's an extra layer of complexity and uncertainty

56
00:05:47.680 --> 00:05:49.680
and just transaction costs.

57
00:05:49.680 --> 00:05:53.680
So the theory was other things equal if we could just have one currency

58
00:05:53.680 --> 00:06:23.680
for the whole euro area then you know that would put us on an even footing with the United States and maybe then we could compete so that was that's what they were trying to achieve but then you think okay well if surely then if that's the rationale the more the merrier right it wouldn't work to just have everybody in Paris use the same currency right you want you'd want to have a big thing because we just we just said that having it France having its own currency wasn't big enough we wanted to be bigger than just France or bigger than just Germany so then again coming back to

59
00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:29.680
Why did they have all these criteria? How come they were being very selective, at least on paper, about which countries they would let in?

60
00:06:29.680 --> 00:06:40.680
It was because they weren't stupid. They understood the dangers that if some irresponsible country that historically is a very, let's call it a populist government,

61
00:06:40.680 --> 00:06:44.680
and they have lots of big spending programs, and then when they get into trouble they just run the printing press.

62
00:06:44.680 --> 00:06:47.680
I mean, can you imagine? I mean, I know that sounds alien to us.

63
00:06:47.680 --> 00:06:53.680
But again, these people are worried about hypotheticals, they're sort of like science fiction writers worrying about aliens here, right?

64
00:06:53.680 --> 00:07:03.680
So they were concerned, they said look, especially like Germany, which was very austere and conservative in terms of monetary policy,

65
00:07:03.680 --> 00:07:06.680
because they had had such a horrible experience in the interwar period, right?

66
00:07:06.680 --> 00:07:14.680
So the Germans had this tradition of the worst thing in the world that you can do to your country is to destroy the currency, that trumps anything else.

67
00:07:14.680 --> 00:07:22.680
I don't care how much the unions are complaining, I don't care what the budget deficit is, you do not destroy your currency, because that's just awful, that's unacceptable.

68
00:07:22.680 --> 00:07:42.680
So the Germans, more than anyone else, were very concerned, so that's why they insisted on these rigid rules, because again, they didn't want to merge with some irresponsible group, and then based on how, because if you're all subject to the same currency, called the euro here, who determines how many euros get printed?

69
00:07:42.680 --> 00:07:50.680
Who's in charge of that? And the Germans knew, if we join with all these people, we're not going to be the ones necessarily calling the shots ten years down the road.

70
00:07:50.680 --> 00:07:56.680
And so we want to make sure there's a system in place where we don't end up bailing out irresponsible governments.

71
00:07:56.680 --> 00:08:03.680
Okay, so again, just like with the U.S. Constitution, you can see how well these safeguards worked out in practice, but that was the theory.

72
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:17.680
So now, what's happened, and I don't have that much time, and like I said, I want to get to the juicy anecdotes that would fuel conspiracy theorists in a few minutes, so let me not spend too much time on the boring theory, but again, it is, this is educational.

73
00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:32.680
I want to explain this stuff to you, because it's funny. I mean, it's not ha-ha funny, but it's funny in terms of anything that economists could say being funny, is that the way the interventionists have spun this, it's just ludicrous.

74
00:08:32.680 --> 00:08:40.680
So, more than any other currency in the history of civilization, the euro is first of all a fiat currency.

75
00:08:40.680 --> 00:08:47.680
It was never linked to anything else, whereas the lira and the deutschmark and so on, you could sort of trace.

76
00:08:47.680 --> 00:08:53.680
They were fiat currencies when they were phased out, depending on when you date it, 99 or 2002.

77
00:08:53.680 --> 00:08:59.680
But historically, the reason that people used them was because there had been a link to gold or silver a long time ago.

78
00:08:59.680 --> 00:09:07.680
It's been a long time, but just like with the dollar right now, it's a fiat currency, but the reason we all use dollars historically is because at one point, you know, it was linked to gold or silver, right?

79
00:09:07.680 --> 00:09:13.680
So it's the same thing with these, whereas the euro was completely a creation out of these technocrats' minds, right?

80
00:09:13.680 --> 00:09:28.680
This was designed by people, and it's not even just Keynesians here, I mean, this is like a mainstream indictment that it was actually guys like Robert Mundell, if you know him, were some of the people behind this in terms of what was called optimal currency area theory.

81
00:09:28.680 --> 00:09:35.400
Area Theory. So the Euro, if you're going to get mad at technocratic economists for screwing

82
00:09:35.400 --> 00:09:40.200
things up, the Euro is clearly the thing that they're most responsible for. So if it worked,

83
00:09:40.200 --> 00:09:43.620
that would be a strike against the Austrians and the, you know, fuddy-duddies who believed

84
00:09:43.620 --> 00:09:47.720
in gold. And if it didn't work, that should be a strike against the people who believe

85
00:09:47.720 --> 00:09:52.920
in fiat currency. So how do guys like Paul Krugman and so forth interpret what's happening?

86
00:09:52.920 --> 00:09:57.160
Because clearly it's not working. There's a crisis, there's a Euro crisis that, you

87
00:09:57.160 --> 00:10:06.160
These safeguards didn't work. The claims that the euro would make Europe an economic powerhouse and so on, those obviously, those things were wrong.

88
00:10:06.160 --> 00:10:21.160
Clearly the dangers of having the ability just to print up money to bail people out, that trumped whatever theoretical things you could do with a simplified model on a piece of paper and draw some charts and diagrams to show you why this is better than gold.

89
00:10:21.160 --> 00:10:28.160
And clearly those abstract theories were wrong, and this was a dangerous thing, so how did Krugman and those guys, how did they spin this?

90
00:10:28.160 --> 00:10:37.160
They're saying, oh, well, the crisis right now, you know what the problem is? The problem is not that these other governments ran up huge debts thinking they were going to get bailed out,

91
00:10:37.160 --> 00:10:45.160
and that investors were stupidly lending to them at interest rates that would have been applicable to German bonds, but not to Greek bonds or Italian bonds.

92
00:10:45.160 --> 00:10:55.160
That's not the issue. For them, Krugman and those guys, they see the problem here is that Greece right now is under a pseudo-gold standard, okay?

93
00:10:55.160 --> 00:11:05.160
So it's the gold standard's fault. It's the gold standard's fault that this fiat currency that was never in its history tied to commodity in any way is blowing up in our face. It's the fault of gold. Duh.

94
00:11:05.160 --> 00:11:09.320
So, again, just to understand, how could he possibly say that?

95
00:11:09.320 --> 00:11:14.840
Well, here's his logic, he's saying, because what needs to happen, in Krugman's mind,

96
00:11:14.840 --> 00:11:19.400
is that the problem is that Greece right now, yeah, sure, they might have had a budget deficit,

97
00:11:19.400 --> 00:11:23.320
they were a little bit irresponsible, but the fundamental problem with them right now is that,

98
00:11:23.320 --> 00:11:26.600
if you know, they have insufficient aggregate demand, that's always the problem,

99
00:11:26.600 --> 00:11:31.160
and they can't inflate it enough because the people in the private sector don't want to spend,

100
00:11:31.160 --> 00:11:34.280
the businesses don't want to invest because prospects are terrible,

101
00:11:34.280 --> 00:11:38.680
The government can't run bigger deficits right now because of the system that they're in.

102
00:11:38.680 --> 00:11:44.480
Their investors around the world are scared about taking on more debt, so their interest rates are spiking.

103
00:11:44.480 --> 00:11:50.780
So the only solution would be, if Greece were back on the drachma, its own currency, they could just inflate.

104
00:11:50.780 --> 00:11:57.680
And that would solve the problem. In other words, they would pay off their old bonds with inflated currency.

105
00:11:57.680 --> 00:12:01.880
And yeah, that would, in a sense, be a technical default, but not an actual default.

106
00:12:01.880 --> 00:12:31.880
and more precisely, it would make Greek exports more competitive, right, because it would devalue the, if they went back and just had their own currency, that their akma would fall against other currencies around the world, so now all of a sudden Greek exports are cheaper and that's how they could boost their export sector and that would solve the unemployment problem, their tax revenues would go up because everybody's working again and then the crisis would pass away. And Krugman points to Iceland, for example, which is a share of

107
00:12:31.880 --> 00:12:37.760
of GDP had enormous debts, and he says the reason Iceland right now is doing a lot better

108
00:12:37.760 --> 00:12:43.260
than the countries in Europe is that Iceland wasn't part of the Euro system formally.

109
00:12:43.260 --> 00:12:47.800
They did have some Euro-denominated debts, but they just repudiated them, just defaulted

110
00:12:47.800 --> 00:12:53.040
on them and let those bankers eat it, and their own currency crashed against other currencies,

111
00:12:53.040 --> 00:12:56.120
and so yeah, there was a brief period where they were really in trouble, but now they're

112
00:12:56.120 --> 00:12:57.120
doing fine.

113
00:12:57.120 --> 00:13:00.880
They hit rock bottom quickly and are growing out of it.

114
00:13:00.880 --> 00:13:06.160
So that's the sense in which Krugman is calling Greece right now as being stuck in this rigid

115
00:13:06.160 --> 00:13:10.360
straight jacket of a pseudo gold standard because he's saying it's just like in the

116
00:13:10.360 --> 00:13:15.580
30s when according to not just the Keynesians but also the Chicago School monetarists, people

117
00:13:15.580 --> 00:13:19.440
like Milton Friedman said this, the problem in the 30s, the reason the Great Depression

118
00:13:19.440 --> 00:13:25.040
got so bad is that the classical gold standard was still in force at least among some countries

119
00:13:25.040 --> 00:13:30.080
and they couldn't inflate enough because they were afraid that their currencies would fall

120
00:13:30.080 --> 00:13:34.140
against the official dollar peg, or sorry, gold peg, and so that's their hands were

121
00:13:34.140 --> 00:13:35.140
tied.

122
00:13:35.140 --> 00:13:38.820
So that's the sense in which Krugman is claiming this.

123
00:13:38.820 --> 00:13:46.140
So let me just talk now a little bit about the reality there.

124
00:13:46.140 --> 00:13:48.300
Of course, well let me just do one more theoretical thing.

125
00:13:48.300 --> 00:13:50.940
So just theoretically, does that make sense?

126
00:13:50.940 --> 00:13:56.260
Well no, as I said on the one hand, it's crazy to blame something that is the furthest thing

127
00:13:56.260 --> 00:14:01.060
Everything from being related to a commodity market-based money, namely the Euro, which

128
00:14:01.060 --> 00:14:06.080
was explicitly designed by technocrats and installed, never had a gold peg at all or

129
00:14:06.080 --> 00:14:08.000
anything like it.

130
00:14:08.000 --> 00:14:11.360
To blame that on the gold standard, I mean, you couldn't make the systems further apart

131
00:14:11.360 --> 00:14:12.780
from each other.

132
00:14:12.780 --> 00:14:16.260
And beyond that though, they're making it sound as if it's just an incidental little

133
00:14:16.260 --> 00:14:21.520
offshoot, but the problem that happened in this system is that a bunch of these member

134
00:14:21.520 --> 00:14:29.520
The first states were able to run up their debt and then people were horrified to discover that there wasn't going to be printing to bail them out.

135
00:14:29.520 --> 00:14:34.520
I mean, again, with these convergence criteria, that was the fear all along.

136
00:14:34.520 --> 00:14:38.520
It's not like this was some unanticipated danger.

137
00:14:38.520 --> 00:14:42.520
I mean, this is exactly what the problem was, or the fear was.

138
00:14:42.520 --> 00:14:47.520
Because when you come in, if you're in an irresponsible government like the Greek government historically,

139
00:14:47.520 --> 00:14:52.400
People, investors know that they tend not to balance their budgets and that if things

140
00:14:52.400 --> 00:14:56.160
get rough they might just default or they might inflate.

141
00:14:56.160 --> 00:15:00.720
What do you do as an investor compared to say like the German government's debt?

142
00:15:00.720 --> 00:15:03.760
You insist on a higher interest rate.

143
00:15:03.760 --> 00:15:08.060
But now, so you say from the point of view of these member states that were thinking

144
00:15:08.060 --> 00:15:10.980
of joining the euro area, what was in it for them?

145
00:15:10.980 --> 00:15:14.560
Why would they submit to all of these onerous restrictions?

146
00:15:14.560 --> 00:15:27.560
Well, because they were going to get lower interest rates in exchange, that was the whole point, or that was one of the points, and also because they thought it would make it easier for their businesses to reduce transaction costs and do business with other European countries, right?

147
00:15:27.560 --> 00:15:38.560
So if you're a government that historically had high interest rates on your debt and you can be good for a few years and satisfy the convergence rules and then get admitted to the Euro area,

148
00:16:08.560 --> 00:16:38.560
I don't want to shock any of you, but believe it or not, the people who designed this system and who were responsible for administering it, they didn't go on national television and say, we screwed up, sorry, we fully apologize, we're going to resign now and let Tom DiLorenzo guide you through this storm. That's not what they said. He was busy talking to Fannie Mae at the time, so he was kind of tied up. Instead, what they said is, we told you guys this would happen, go look at the theory of optimal currency area,

149
00:16:38.560 --> 00:16:44.520
and it says just to define that term optimal currency area means if you have

150
00:16:44.520 --> 00:16:48.840
a fiat currency geographically or in terms of how many people should be using

151
00:16:48.840 --> 00:16:53.880
it right should the whole earth just be using one fiat currency or you know

152
00:16:53.880 --> 00:16:57.000
should just one household be you know should every household issue its own

153
00:16:57.000 --> 00:16:59.680
currency and and you can see that the households don't work because then

154
00:16:59.680 --> 00:17:04.000
effectively we'd be back in barter if everyone had you know if I had a Murphy

155
00:17:04.000 --> 00:17:07.160
piece of paper and you guys had your own individual things I mean that wouldn't

156
00:17:07.160 --> 00:17:11.160
We wouldn't even consider that money. That would just be, who knows what it would be, but it wouldn't be money.

157
00:17:11.160 --> 00:17:17.160
So, clearly, you can't make it, it's not optimal to have every household issuing its own currency.

158
00:17:17.160 --> 00:17:23.160
But again, even just having every city do it also doesn't work because there's so much trade going on among cities.

159
00:17:23.160 --> 00:17:29.160
But on the other hand, these guys like Mundell and these other mainstream economists, when they're talking about optimal currency area,

160
00:17:29.160 --> 00:17:35.160
they said it's not the whole planet. And so they were coming up with principles or models to say,

161
00:17:35.160 --> 00:17:38.620
What, how do we figure that out, at least theoretically?

162
00:17:38.620 --> 00:17:42.160
And they said part of what you wanna have be the case

163
00:17:42.160 --> 00:17:45.160
is that the region that uses the same currency,

164
00:17:45.160 --> 00:17:49.560
ideally there's free labor and capital mobility

165
00:17:49.560 --> 00:17:51.420
within that region, right?

166
00:17:51.420 --> 00:17:56.320
Because the idea is, let's say there's a localized problem

167
00:17:56.320 --> 00:17:58.400
like in some sector over here

168
00:17:58.400 --> 00:18:00.160
where there's high unemployment,

169
00:18:00.160 --> 00:18:02.340
and this is connected using the same currency

170
00:18:02.340 --> 00:18:04.400
as these people over here.

171
00:18:04.400 --> 00:18:11.240
He said, well, it would be good if the workers or the people who are looking for jobs over here can just move over here where the jobs are.

172
00:18:11.240 --> 00:18:16.280
And so that way you don't have to have the currency in the whole area adjust because it can't, right?

173
00:18:16.280 --> 00:18:21.560
Because if there's high unemployment here, what you want to have happen is have wages go down over here relative to over here.

174
00:18:21.560 --> 00:18:27.400
And as you know, if you study mainstream models, wages are sticky and that's a big problem for them, for these modelers.

175
00:18:27.400 --> 00:18:31.000
And so they say that that's why it works in the United States, right?

176
00:18:31.000 --> 00:19:01.000
Because if there is a bad, there's high unemployment in Florida, those workers can fairly easily move to Montana, or move to other U.S. states, it's not a big deal, there's not all sorts of, you know, taxes on them if they want to change their state of residence, and so that's why it works for the U.S. as a whole country just to have the dollar, because there's mobility within sight. In contrast, in Europe, it's not as easy to move around, and so if there's high unemployment in Greece, it's not as easy for those workers just to go move to Germany,

177
00:19:01.000 --> 00:19:31.000
In Germany, that there's more obstacles, so that's one thing that they say that the people who were skeptics of the Euro from the beginning, not just Austrian free market types, but even mainstream economists, some of them were saying to their credit from the very beginning, this isn't going to work, just look at this textbook theory, optimal currency area, apply it to the conditions in Europe, and you guys are crazy, you're playing with fire, this might blow up in all of our faces. And so that was one of the arguments they said, that the labor and capital mobility weren't there.

178
00:19:31.000 --> 00:19:35.000
is there's not a fiscal union so they said what you guys are doing here is

179
00:19:35.000 --> 00:19:39.740
you're trying to have the best of both worlds you want to have a currency union

180
00:19:39.740 --> 00:19:44.040
and get all the advantages that the US has from the fact that they all use the

181
00:19:44.040 --> 00:19:47.860
dollar but you don't want to go you don't want the individual states to

182
00:19:47.860 --> 00:19:51.580
surrender their sovereignty right you still want it to be the case that the

183
00:19:51.580 --> 00:19:55.020
Greek government can determine how much it's going to tax its people and how

184
00:19:55.020 --> 00:19:58.020
much it's going to spend and you want the same thing for the Italians and the

185
00:19:58.020 --> 00:20:02.580
in the Germans and so forth, whereas the United States, yeah it is true the individual states

186
00:20:03.220 --> 00:20:07.700
can tax and spend at the state level, but there's also this overarching federal government that's

187
00:20:07.700 --> 00:20:12.180
really the lion's share of that stuff, and in particular they're going to say the reason the

188
00:20:12.180 --> 00:20:18.580
U.S. is able to handle economic calamities better than Europe is, is that, again go back to that

189
00:20:18.580 --> 00:20:25.460
example, if there's a recession that's centered in Florida for example, well then just given the

190
00:20:25.460 --> 00:20:29.660
In the nature of federal programs, what ends up happening is the rest of the 49 states

191
00:20:29.660 --> 00:20:35.260
are taxed and that money is funneled into Florida through unemployment checks and food

192
00:20:35.260 --> 00:20:36.840
stamps and things like that.

193
00:20:36.840 --> 00:20:43.100
So they're saying the U.S. in practice has this system whereby when certain parts of

194
00:20:43.100 --> 00:20:48.220
it are hit harder than others in terms of an economic calamity, their fiscal system

195
00:20:48.220 --> 00:20:53.460
is set up such that automatically everybody else gets taxed more and that spending gets

196
00:20:53.460 --> 00:20:54.460
sent into that region.

197
00:20:54.460 --> 00:20:59.660
So they said that's what we need to have in Europe going forward. That's the lesson they drew from this and so you see

198
00:21:00.620 --> 00:21:04.100
Back, I think it was in September when the head of the European Central Bank

199
00:21:05.400 --> 00:21:09.460
By the way for the for the European people who are watching is I'm gonna butcher all these names

200
00:21:09.460 --> 00:21:11.460
I just want to let you know that up front

201
00:21:12.020 --> 00:21:18.140
So the the former guy was what Jean-Claude Trichet and then the new guy was I think Mario Draghi

202
00:21:18.220 --> 00:21:20.820
So he comes in both of them during this transition

203
00:21:20.820 --> 00:21:50.820
Transition, giving statements to the press saying we need to have more integration, we need to have unification in terms of Europe, and what they meant was, it can no longer be the case that the people of Greece determine how much the Greek government taxes and spends, that now that decision has to be subordinated to the greater good, and they even said, I think it was the outgoing guy, said something along the lines, this isn't an exact quote, but I'm not putting words in his mouth, said something like,

204
00:21:50.820 --> 00:21:55.940
It can no longer be the case that, you know, Greece can just do whatever it wants.

205
00:21:55.940 --> 00:22:02.460
There needs to be a mechanism by which people in Brussels can punish them for doing something that hurts everybody else.

206
00:22:02.460 --> 00:22:09.220
Alright, so that's, you know, when you hear those phrases, people talking about integration and union, I mean, that sounds like a great thing.

207
00:22:09.220 --> 00:22:19.540
But what they're saying is they want to have a super-national group of technocrats who can then override the individual decisions of these nation-states.

208
00:22:19.540 --> 00:22:29.540
Now, when we say all this stuff, it's not like I'm a big fan of democracy at the state level, you know, in terms of the European nation states, right?

209
00:22:29.540 --> 00:22:34.540
It's, you know, I've read Hans Hoppe's book on democracy. We're all familiar with the arguments there.

210
00:22:34.540 --> 00:22:41.540
But the point is, like Rothbard used to say about the Federal Reserve, when he would say it was unaccountable, and he says something, I'm paraphrasing,

211
00:22:41.540 --> 00:23:09.540
The American people get mad enough, they can just throw the bums out and put in some new group who can conceivably fire those people, but with the Federal Reserve, the link there is much more tenuous, and there's a degree of separation where the people running the Fed are even harder for the American people to have any control over, and it's the same thing here.

212
00:23:09.540 --> 00:23:14.540
It's not that I am a big fan of what the Greek government would do based on the elections

213
00:23:14.540 --> 00:23:19.100
and voting patterns of its citizens, but at least they have some control.

214
00:23:19.100 --> 00:23:22.420
If they're getting completely ripped off and having their tax money sent to some banker

215
00:23:22.420 --> 00:23:26.580
in another country, at least they could have an election throw that government out and

216
00:23:26.580 --> 00:23:31.180
put in somebody who says, no, we're not going to do that, whereas here they're setting

217
00:23:31.180 --> 00:23:36.220
in motion mechanisms where they could nip that in the bud, where they could override

218
00:23:36.220 --> 00:23:37.220
that.

219
00:23:37.220 --> 00:23:54.460
That's part of what's going on, and like I said, these are statements they made to the press, and I'm just giving you the theoretical background to understand how could they justify that, why would they be able to say, pointing to academic research, that, oh, this is what the science tells us to do, right? So that's where they're coming from.

220
00:23:55.700 --> 00:24:01.940
Okay, let me move on now to some more empirical things, or things that actually happened historically.

221
00:24:01.940 --> 00:24:13.940
So part of the problem with this story that all we were trying to do was just look out for what was best for Europe and this problem erupted and no one saw it coming and now what do we do?

222
00:24:13.940 --> 00:24:16.940
Well, I guess we should just give up everybody's sovereignty because that's the best thing to do going forward.

223
00:24:16.940 --> 00:24:23.940
That's the best way to help these people. To see that story, something a little fishy there, just take the example of Greece.

224
00:24:23.940 --> 00:24:24.940
of Greece.

225
00:24:24.940 --> 00:24:32.540
It's not the case that the Greek government just shocked everybody and they didn't understand

226
00:24:32.540 --> 00:24:33.540
that this was happening.

227
00:24:33.540 --> 00:24:34.540
Okay?

228
00:24:34.540 --> 00:24:38.540
The people in charge of these super-national organizations, they knew the Greek government

229
00:24:38.540 --> 00:24:40.740
was lying to them for a long time.

230
00:24:40.740 --> 00:24:46.060
So let me just read to you what happened to this group called Eurostat.

231
00:24:46.060 --> 00:24:52.740
So they're like the European statistical agency that compiles these sorts of documents.

232
00:24:52.740 --> 00:25:05.740
So what happened is, when the Greek government, the reports they had been sending in, because remember, Greece was allowed to join, they adopted the Euro and so on, with all of these allegedly stringent requirements about what your deficit had to be and so on,

233
00:25:05.740 --> 00:25:15.740
and it turns out that they were just completely lying, that their deficit was much higher than what it should have been to get allowed admission, and this is part of what set the crisis in motion.

234
00:25:15.740 --> 00:25:45.740
So this group, Eurostat, they prepared a report, you know, they did a bunch of interviews with Greek officials and then, so here's, you know, they're giving the interview or they're summarizing the report, giving it to policy makers, so let me just read you some excerpts from this, because some of it's a little bit funny, and again, when I say it's funny, I don't mean it's like memoirs of George Carlin, I mean it's as funny as a Eurostat report on the Greek government's financial dealings could possibly be, you know, full of mirth. Okay, so they say, during our March 2010,

235
00:25:45.740 --> 00:25:49.060
methodological visit it became evident that the Greek authorities had reported

236
00:25:49.060 --> 00:25:52.940
until then only very small amounts for debt guaranteed by government under

237
00:25:52.940 --> 00:25:57.380
repeated calls and not yet assumed by government amounts of around 100 million

238
00:25:57.380 --> 00:26:01.900
euro had been reported compared with a correct amount of around 11 billion euro

239
00:26:01.900 --> 00:26:07.180
all right that that's not a rounding error all right that's that's kind of a

240
00:26:07.180 --> 00:26:10.460
big deal all right so again it for people who don't get what that what so

241
00:26:10.460 --> 00:26:13.580
part of what happened is when the Greek government is you know reporting to

242
00:26:13.580 --> 00:26:17.020
These Authorities to like, oh yeah, let us start using the euro.

243
00:26:17.020 --> 00:26:18.900
They were like putting down their liabilities

244
00:26:18.900 --> 00:26:20.780
or reporting them, and so part of it is

245
00:26:20.780 --> 00:26:23.220
it wasn't actual cash going out the door,

246
00:26:23.220 --> 00:26:26.220
but they were guaranteeing certain types of debt.

247
00:26:26.220 --> 00:26:27.820
And the point is they were saying,

248
00:26:27.820 --> 00:26:29.900
yeah, we're on the hook for about 100 million euro,

249
00:26:29.900 --> 00:26:31.580
and actually, euro stat comes in.

250
00:26:31.580 --> 00:26:32.780
This is actually, after further review,

251
00:26:32.780 --> 00:26:34.180
it's more like 11 billion.

252
00:26:34.180 --> 00:26:36.180
All right, so that's just one example.

253
00:26:37.300 --> 00:26:40.580
Now here's a typical passage of this.

254
00:26:40.580 --> 00:26:42.640
Like I said, the whole thing is like 20 pages long,

255
00:26:42.640 --> 00:26:45.520
but I was going through it and this is something

256
00:26:45.520 --> 00:26:47.620
that was typical.

257
00:26:47.620 --> 00:26:50.080
So I'll try to just read you enough so you get the joke.

258
00:26:50.080 --> 00:26:52.320
Okay, so they say, again, during the March 2010

259
00:26:52.320 --> 00:26:55.160
methodological visit, Eurostat was informed

260
00:26:55.160 --> 00:26:59.640
that the 2009 data in the EDP table 2C da-da-da

261
00:26:59.640 --> 00:27:03.160
were derived from a short survey sent to local governments.

262
00:27:03.160 --> 00:27:05.720
The table showed a significantly increased surplus

263
00:27:05.720 --> 00:27:08.800
of local governments in 2009 compared to any

264
00:27:08.800 --> 00:27:12.040
of the previous years included in the EDP notification.

265
00:27:12.040 --> 00:27:20.040
Okay, so what Eurostat is saying is that, you know, in 2010, March 2020, we went to the Greek authorities and we said this number seems too optimistic.

266
00:27:20.040 --> 00:27:24.040
You're saying all these local governments had this big surplus. Where'd you get that number from?

267
00:27:24.040 --> 00:27:30.040
Alright, and that's what they were trying to figure out because the number was way too big compared to the historical reports of that same number.

268
00:27:30.040 --> 00:27:40.040
Eurostat expressed its concerns about this figure, particularly as in the past it had observed downward revisions to the local government surplus in successive EDP notifications.

269
00:27:40.040 --> 00:27:42.160
Okay, so they're saying not only is this a big number,

270
00:27:42.160 --> 00:27:44.120
but in the past you always give us a big number

271
00:27:44.120 --> 00:27:45.440
and then later you revise it down.

272
00:27:45.440 --> 00:27:46.960
So are you sure this number's right?

273
00:27:46.960 --> 00:27:48.840
Where'd this come from?

274
00:27:48.840 --> 00:27:51.040
So a month later they go back to get the answer.

275
00:27:51.040 --> 00:27:54.520
During the April 2010 survey round,

276
00:27:54.520 --> 00:27:56.800
Eurostat was informed by the Greek authorities

277
00:27:56.800 --> 00:27:59.120
that while the information for these years

278
00:27:59.120 --> 00:28:01.480
was based on the results of the census,

279
00:28:01.480 --> 00:28:05.080
data for 08 and 09 were calculated by using indices

280
00:28:05.080 --> 00:28:08.440
on the basis of information derived from the short survey.

281
00:28:08.440 --> 00:28:11.080
It was also mentioned that this information was provisional

282
00:28:11.080 --> 00:28:13.220
as most of the municipalities were not able to provide

283
00:28:13.220 --> 00:28:15.320
finalized information earlier than in October.

284
00:28:15.320 --> 00:28:16.420
Oh, okay, so they didn't have the data,

285
00:28:16.420 --> 00:28:18.180
so they used the earlier.

286
00:28:18.180 --> 00:28:21.840
Okay, but when were those surveys done?

287
00:28:21.840 --> 00:28:24.000
Concerning the data for municipal enterprises,

288
00:28:24.000 --> 00:28:26.520
Eurostat was informed that the reported data

289
00:28:26.520 --> 00:28:29.640
were based on an old survey conducted in 2002.

290
00:28:29.640 --> 00:28:33.680
And again, for those of you who have been dozing off

291
00:28:33.680 --> 00:28:36.520
for a look at your BlackBerry, the point is this was in

292
00:28:36.520 --> 00:28:41.960
numbers that were reported in 09 for the previous year in Eurostats Raising Eyebrows

293
00:28:41.960 --> 00:28:45.640
and they said, oh yeah, that was actually based on something that was done in 2002, okay?

294
00:28:45.640 --> 00:28:51.000
And again, these numbers were well above historical trend and helped minimize how bad things looked

295
00:28:51.000 --> 00:28:53.320
as they were saying, oh we got these local surpluses.

296
00:28:53.320 --> 00:28:58.800
And the people in 2002 knew that that was gonna be necessary six years later.

297
00:28:58.800 --> 00:29:03.000
Okay, as far as the people who like to bring up Goldman Sachs and everything,

298
00:29:03.000 --> 00:29:06.720
Any of these scandals, golden sex is always there on the scene.

299
00:29:06.720 --> 00:29:09.520
Wherever there's corruption, we'll be there.

300
00:29:09.520 --> 00:29:13.960
So here, what they did, let me just see how we're doing on time, okay.

301
00:29:13.960 --> 00:29:19.120
They, what happened here, and this was, you know, the press picked up on this, so there's

302
00:29:19.120 --> 00:29:24.280
all sorts of things that the Greek government was doing to minimize how bad its books were.

303
00:29:24.280 --> 00:29:30.080
Okay, but the point is, they never satisfied these convergence criteria, they never should have been allowed into it,

304
00:29:30.080 --> 00:30:00.080
and that's what I'm saying that this wasn't just some honest mistake I mean the people who were administering this system knew full well that they were going to come in and then we can talk later about well why would they do that why would they let these people come in if they were violating the rules but clearly people you know shady stuff is going on I think they were just surprised at how shady it was when the when the true facts came like but one of the things so this was by no means the only thing but one of the things one of the tricks was that Goldman Sachs in when was this I think it was in 2001 I'm not sure about

305
00:30:00.080 --> 00:30:30.080
about that. They came in and they let the Greek government engage in a currency swap, and what happened is that it was basically, economically speaking, it was like a loan of 2.8 billion euros at the time, but that didn't get reported, so what happened is Goldman allowed the Greek government to basically get a loan from foreign banks of 2.8 billion dollars without having to report any of that in terms of their liabilities

306
00:30:30.080 --> 00:30:42.580
And the way they did that was because the rules for reporting to Eurostat at the time, financial derivatives weren't, you didn't have to report that stuff.

307
00:30:42.580 --> 00:30:50.580
And the reason, there was a rationale for that, because normally, if you're just going to hedge yourself, you know, you're engaging in foreign transactions, you're just doing a currency swap,

308
00:30:50.580 --> 00:30:59.080
at the moment that you enter the arrangement where, like, you know, you're promising to give euros against dollars down the road or whatever the thing is, where the details are,

309
00:30:59.080 --> 00:31:04.680
You use the futures markets and so on to make it have a net value of zero

310
00:31:04.680 --> 00:31:06.360
as the moment when you enter into it, right?

311
00:31:06.360 --> 00:31:08.440
So the market value of that thing is zero.

312
00:31:08.440 --> 00:31:13.280
Now, if it moves against you down the road, then, you know, it can go against you or it can move in your favor.

313
00:31:13.280 --> 00:31:20.080
But the point is the moment of entering into it, if you're using the appropriate market forecasts and so on in the futures markets,

314
00:31:20.080 --> 00:31:22.200
it doesn't have a net market value.

315
00:31:22.200 --> 00:31:24.800
So that's why you wouldn't report that as a liability.

316
00:31:24.800 --> 00:31:31.800
So how was it that Goldman allowed them to effectively get a loan of $2.8 billion is because they put in a bogus exchange rate.

317
00:31:31.800 --> 00:31:38.800
So they let the Greek government promise to give one currency in the future in exchange for another one,

318
00:31:38.800 --> 00:31:46.800
when at the time that they agreed to that, they were on the hook for $2.8 billion if things turned out the way everyone thought they would turn out.

319
00:31:46.800 --> 00:31:49.800
So that was the loophole they used. That's just one example.

320
00:31:49.800 --> 00:31:56.280
and then just to finish that they let's see so then in August of 2000 so at the

321
00:31:56.280 --> 00:32:01.440
time it allowed the Greek government to push back that obligation to the year 2019

322
00:32:01.440 --> 00:32:06.240
then was things started getting uncomfortable they want a little bit

323
00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:10.200
more wiggle room so in August of 2005 an interest rate swap contract was

324
00:32:10.200 --> 00:32:16.320
restructured pushing the maturity from 2019 back to 2037 all right and then also

325
00:32:16.320 --> 00:32:22.280
Goldman, God bless them, sold its rights and obligations to the National Bank of Greece

326
00:32:22.280 --> 00:32:26.400
for the then market value of the swap and then it was estimated that Goldman earned

327
00:32:26.400 --> 00:32:28.680
about $300 million from the deal.

328
00:32:28.680 --> 00:32:32.800
So that's why a lot of people at the time were outraged at Goldman Sachs because they

329
00:32:32.800 --> 00:32:38.040
were saying Goldman knew it was helping the Greek authorities evade the requirements for

330
00:32:38.040 --> 00:32:44.560
being part of the Eurozone and yet Goldman was just serving its client and earning $300

331
00:32:44.560 --> 00:32:45.560
million.

332
00:32:45.560 --> 00:32:50.640
Now, at the end of that report, that Eurostat report, just to summarize, so it's this thing,

333
00:32:50.640 --> 00:32:55.560
the other stuff I mentioned, and a host of other things that aren't as funny, what's

334
00:32:55.560 --> 00:32:59.400
the big ticket result?

335
00:32:59.400 --> 00:33:03.040
Based on the information that Eurostat compiled in the few months when they kept interviewing

336
00:33:03.040 --> 00:33:08.880
them, in 2009, based on what the Greek government originally said its debt was compared to now

337
00:33:08.880 --> 00:33:13.520
what Eurostat thought the more accurate figure was, they thought the government was understating

338
00:33:13.520 --> 00:33:19.520
$24.6 Billion Euros, 10.5% of Greek GDP

339
00:33:43.520 --> 00:33:49.160
And that just shows that the system is crazy if it's that vulnerable to some government lying or you can say that they

340
00:33:49.280 --> 00:33:53.280
Yeah, they kind of knew that this was going on and they didn't really care. So why wouldn't they care?

341
00:33:53.280 --> 00:33:59.120
Why would they let them lie with impunity and so forth because I mean if anybody is bothered by lying

342
00:33:59.120 --> 00:34:04.120
It's people in government, you know, I mean, they just they really just take offense at that kind of stuff a dishonesty per se

343
00:34:04.840 --> 00:34:07.640
but if you start thinking well, no because

344
00:34:08.560 --> 00:34:10.820
You know these what happens there is

345
00:34:10.820 --> 00:34:17.380
Because banks make loans to governments, and then if they think that, oh, if trouble arises,

346
00:34:17.380 --> 00:34:22.020
they're going to get bailed out by the ECB, for example, or the taxpayers in stronger

347
00:34:22.020 --> 00:34:25.140
countries like Germany and so forth, well, then it's okay.

348
00:34:25.140 --> 00:34:30.060
You know, you want to, just like what happened here in the mortgage crisis, you know, some

349
00:34:30.060 --> 00:34:32.780
people say, well, that doesn't make any sense.

350
00:34:32.780 --> 00:34:34.940
Why would all these banks make these terrible loans?

351
00:34:34.940 --> 00:34:39.780
I mean, how could they have been so dumb as to, yeah, we know that they're not moral,

352
00:34:39.780 --> 00:35:09.780
Well, why are they that stupid, too? And then when you look at the incentives and realize, well, that no, actually, a lot of these people didn't suffer, you know, they made these loans to people they knew couldn't pay them off, because they got them off the books and earned their commission and so on, and they weren't the ones left holding the bag. It's the same thing here, where the people, you know, lending this amount of money to the Greek authorities and so forth, they knew full well that they weren't as shipshape as they were maintaining, but they thought ultimately, no, it's fine, because they're not going to let the euro collapse.

353
00:35:39.780 --> 00:35:43.780
not just an honest mistake, you have to look at the incentives that people were facing.

354
00:35:43.780 --> 00:35:47.780
Okay, let's move on now in the last few minutes I have here.

355
00:35:47.780 --> 00:35:54.780
So as far as things that are just a little bit funny,

356
00:35:54.780 --> 00:35:58.780
one other thing before I get into the three leaders here,

357
00:35:58.780 --> 00:36:03.780
so I was talking to, some of you may know this guy Robert Wenzel about this stuff,

358
00:36:03.780 --> 00:36:07.780
and he's a financial blogger, economicpolicyjournal.com is where I go,

359
00:36:07.780 --> 00:36:12.020
And I want to find someone who's more conspiracy-minded than I am, that's where I go.

360
00:36:12.020 --> 00:36:15.660
And I was talking to him about this stuff, and I always imagine that when we're talking

361
00:36:15.660 --> 00:36:19.060
on the phone, the FBI is listening, and they're like, no, that's not what we're doing, guys.

362
00:36:19.060 --> 00:36:23.340
Oh, you're getting warm with that one, yeah, that's good.

363
00:36:23.340 --> 00:36:28.920
So part of what you know right now, what's happening is the US authorities, in conjunction

364
00:36:28.920 --> 00:36:34.460
with other governments, are putting the screws on the Iranian central bank, and so they're

365
00:36:34.460 --> 00:36:36.620
and other central banks around the world.

366
00:36:36.620 --> 00:36:38.740
If you have any dealings with Iran

367
00:36:38.740 --> 00:36:41.060
in terms of their oil exports,

368
00:36:41.060 --> 00:36:42.460
we're gonna penalize you.

369
00:36:42.460 --> 00:36:45.960
So again, just in terms of political economy,

370
00:36:47.540 --> 00:36:49.660
put aside all the stuff about business cycle theory

371
00:36:49.660 --> 00:36:50.500
and inflation and all that.

372
00:36:50.500 --> 00:36:52.860
Just one reason why having a bunch of central banks

373
00:36:52.860 --> 00:36:56.300
is a bad idea is that it makes it more likely

374
00:36:56.300 --> 00:36:58.260
we're gonna go to war because then now

375
00:36:58.260 --> 00:36:59.620
all these transactions are funneled

376
00:36:59.620 --> 00:37:02.020
through these few big organizations

377
00:37:02.020 --> 00:37:09.020
and so now it gives whoever's running the show at the time, you know, the dominant military power, it's easier for it to lean on everybody else.

378
00:37:09.020 --> 00:37:16.020
Whereas it would be kind of hard to tell each individual commercial bank around the world, if we catch you dealing with this guy, you know, we're going to sanction you.

379
00:37:16.020 --> 00:37:26.020
That would be harder to police than to just look at, you know, a handful of central banks around the world and say, if we ever catch anything going through you dealing with this rogue group, then we're going to sanction your whole operation.

380
00:37:26.020 --> 00:37:29.020
So that's just, you know, one other illustration.

381
00:37:29.020 --> 00:37:44.020
Okay, but the few minutes I have left, let me just show you why these, some people, when they look at what's happening in Europe, they will say that, oh yeah, it's the bankers are, you know, clean in house and they're installing people that are going to serve them.

382
00:37:44.020 --> 00:37:56.020
So here, all I'm going to do is just read you things from, you know, Wikipedia or mainstream news articles. This doesn't prove that there's anything untoward going on, but it does, there does seem to be a pattern.

383
00:37:56.020 --> 00:38:26.020
Okay, so three countries that obviously were in trouble, Spain, Greece, and Italy, so let me just quickly explain, and they all recently had their heads of government replaced with somebody else, and just the pattern seems to be that the people that were put in position are probably not the worst mortal enemies of Goldman Sachs, so let me just explain some of this. So in Spain, and again, for foreign viewers, I'm just gonna butcher these names, I apologize. So it's Jose Luis Rodriguez,

384
00:38:26.020 --> 00:38:30.740
Lewis Zapatero, his party got crushed in the elections of the previous Spanish Prime Minister,

385
00:38:30.740 --> 00:38:34.300
so he resigned on December 21st, just a few weeks ago.

386
00:38:34.300 --> 00:38:38.300
He was replaced by Mariano, I don't know if it's Rajoy or Rajoy, I don't know if it's

387
00:38:38.300 --> 00:38:40.380
a silent J, I'm sorry.

388
00:38:40.380 --> 00:38:44.780
So this guy, now he actually isn't an economist himself, but he named his Minister of Economy

389
00:38:44.780 --> 00:38:51.580
as Luis D. Guindos, and this guy has a PhD in economics from a university in Madrid,

390
00:38:51.580 --> 00:38:57.180
Between 2006 and 2008, he was the CEO of Lehman Brothers for Spain and Portugal, and in 2009,

391
00:38:57.180 --> 00:39:00.460
he worked as senior partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

392
00:39:00.460 --> 00:39:05.820
So he's probably not the poster child of Occupy Wall Street, this guy.

393
00:39:05.820 --> 00:39:06.820
But what do you expect, Bob?

394
00:39:06.820 --> 00:39:07.820
There's a financial crisis.

395
00:39:07.820 --> 00:39:11.840
Of course, the incoming prime minister of Spain is going to appoint a guy who knows

396
00:39:11.840 --> 00:39:12.840
the financial markets.

397
00:39:12.840 --> 00:39:13.840
That's not a big...

398
00:39:13.840 --> 00:39:14.840
Okay, fair enough.

399
00:39:14.840 --> 00:39:15.840
Greece.

400
00:39:15.840 --> 00:39:18.700
The previous prime minister was George Papandreou.

401
00:39:18.700 --> 00:39:22.420
He resigned on November 11th, just a couple months ago.

402
00:39:22.420 --> 00:39:25.280
He was replaced by Lucas Papademos.

403
00:39:25.280 --> 00:39:27.620
Now Papademos himself is the economist.

404
00:39:27.620 --> 00:39:29.580
So here I'm talking about the new Greek prime minister.

405
00:39:29.580 --> 00:39:31.140
I'm not talking about somebody he appointed.

406
00:39:31.140 --> 00:39:35.000
I'm talking about this is the prime minister now, the guy who's running the show.

407
00:39:35.000 --> 00:39:37.980
He has a doctorate in economics from MIT.

408
00:39:37.980 --> 00:39:42.900
He taught economics at Columbia from 75 to 84, and then it was the University of Athens.

409
00:39:42.900 --> 00:39:45.980
He has served as senior economist at the Federal Bank of Boston.

410
00:39:45.980 --> 00:39:51.780
He joined the Bank of Greece in 85 as a chief economist, let's see, he was involved at

411
00:39:51.780 --> 00:39:57.140
that time with Greece's transition from the drachma to the euro, after leaving the Bank

412
00:39:57.140 --> 00:40:03.060
of Greece in 2002, he became vice president to Doisenberg and then Trichet at the European

413
00:40:03.060 --> 00:40:07.820
Central Bank, and he's just a little bone to the real conspiracy theorists, he was also

414
00:40:07.820 --> 00:40:12.300
a member of the Trilateral Commission, those people like that kind of stuff, okay.

415
00:40:12.300 --> 00:40:15.820
And then my favorite one is what happened in Italy, so there the previous Prime Minister

416
00:40:15.820 --> 00:40:23.820
The winner was of course, Silvio Berlusconi, who, you know, big media mogul, billionaire and so forth, also apparently has a weakness for the ladies.

417
00:40:23.820 --> 00:40:28.820
He resigned on November 16th. Okay, so you see how this all boom, boom, boom.

418
00:40:28.820 --> 00:40:33.820
These were all within like about a month of each other that these three heads of state are out and these new people are put in.

419
00:40:33.820 --> 00:40:37.820
So who did he get replaced by? And again, here I'm talking about the new, the Prime Minister.

420
00:40:37.820 --> 00:40:41.820
I'm not talking about, you know, the person he appointed. This is the person.

421
00:40:41.820 --> 00:41:11.820
by Mario Monte, who got his degree in economics from Yale University, he taught at the University of Turin, and then he's been the president since so forth, okay, he was appointed in 94 the European Commission, in a capacity as a European Commissioner from 95, he was responsible for the internal market, financial service and financial integration, customs and taxation, this is from Wikipedia, his work with the Commission has earned him the nickname Super Mario from his colleagues and from the press, so that's good that, you know, there might be inflation

422
00:41:11.820 --> 00:41:18.820
and so on, but at least if Europe ever gets overrun by Koopa Troopers, he's going to be able to save them.

423
00:41:18.820 --> 00:41:22.820
For the older people, that's a game I had to play with my seven-year-old over break.

424
00:41:22.820 --> 00:41:25.820
Got a lot of Super Mario jokes, but I'll restrain myself.

425
00:41:25.820 --> 00:41:29.820
Okay, in December of – so again, this guy, he's actually an economist.

426
00:41:29.820 --> 00:41:32.820
It's not like he dabbled. I mean, his job was an economist, okay?

427
00:41:32.820 --> 00:41:36.820
In December of 2009, he became a member of what's called the Future of Europe.

428
00:41:36.820 --> 00:41:40.820
In this forum, he advocated an economic government for Europe and a European monetary fund.

429
00:41:40.820 --> 00:41:45.540
Fund, he also supported a new European deal that sounds like it's a good time

430
00:41:45.540 --> 00:41:49.340
with a better coordination between social and economic issues in Europe.

431
00:41:49.340 --> 00:41:54.940
Let's see in 2010 Monte was asked by the Commission president to produce a report

432
00:41:54.940 --> 00:41:58.420
on the future of the single market proposing further measures towards the

433
00:41:58.420 --> 00:42:02.460
completion of the EU single market and then here's the last paragraph I'll read

434
00:42:02.460 --> 00:42:08.860
you guys. In November of 2011 Monte was appointed as a lifetime senator by the

435
00:42:08.860 --> 00:42:38.860
The Italian President Napolitano, Monti was seen as a favorite to replace Berlusconi to lead a new unity government on the 12th of November following Berlusconi's resignation, Napolitano invited this new guy Monti to form a new government, Monti accepted the offer and held talks with the leaders of Italy's political parties saying that he wanted to form a government that would remain in office until the next scheduled elections in 2013 and then on the 16th of November, Monti unveiled a, and this is how Wikipedia describes it, Monti unveiled a technocratic cabinet and was a

436
00:42:38.860 --> 00:42:44.860
... officially sworn in as the Prime Minister of Italy, he also appointed himself as Minister of Economy and Finance.

437
00:42:44.860 --> 00:42:54.860
So you can see here where these people are coming from and why the title of this talk I think is quite accurate,

438
00:42:54.860 --> 00:43:00.860
that these three heads of state in rapid succession within about five weeks of each other are all gone and they're replaced by people,

439
00:43:00.860 --> 00:43:06.860
at least two of them, it's not like the voters in those countries had any influence at all,

440
00:43:06.860 --> 00:43:09.960
It's not even like they voted for a party that said, oh yeah, we're going to put this guy in there.

441
00:43:09.960 --> 00:43:15.160
With this guy, Monti, the Italian people, you know, not until 2013 do they even have a chance

442
00:43:15.160 --> 00:43:18.960
to go to a general election and, you know, endorse his party or not.

443
00:43:18.960 --> 00:43:22.860
This is, he was just put in there, and like I said, two of these guys are actually

444
00:43:22.860 --> 00:43:27.260
PhD economists who have worked in this area, and if you go look at their history,

445
00:43:27.260 --> 00:43:31.860
they've worked in and out of financial circles with integration and so forth.

446
00:43:31.860 --> 00:43:42.260
So, it certainly does not look like the people, you know, these big worldwide international investment banks are going to be the ones taking the hit from this crisis.

447
00:43:42.260 --> 00:43:46.560
It looks like it's going to be the taxpayers and the people holding currency.

448
00:43:46.560 --> 00:43:49.560
With that happy note, I'll turn it back over to Doug. Thanks everybody.
