WEBVTT

NOTE The American Presidency: Critical Episodes in Its Growth, Part II

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.560
Well, first of all, let me just say thank you very much for this week

2
00:00:04.560 --> 00:00:07.280
and thank you to the Mises Institute for having me

3
00:00:07.280 --> 00:00:10.000
and to Lew Rockwell and to everyone here.

4
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:13.440
And it's been a pleasure for me to renew some old acquaintances

5
00:00:13.440 --> 00:00:15.520
and to meet some new folks, you know,

6
00:00:15.520 --> 00:00:17.080
always wonderful to meet the great folks

7
00:00:17.080 --> 00:00:18.840
who are associated with the Institute.

8
00:00:18.840 --> 00:00:20.280
It does such important work.

9
00:00:20.280 --> 00:00:23.120
It's my favorite place to be basically in the world.

10
00:00:23.120 --> 00:00:35.120
Okay, well, returning to where we left off, I'm going to keep talking about presidents until the end.

11
00:00:35.120 --> 00:00:42.120
And this morning, my order of business was to say a few general words about the presidency,

12
00:00:42.120 --> 00:00:50.120
then to talk about it, give an example, give Theodore Roosevelt as an example of somebody who radically transformed the office,

13
00:00:50.120 --> 00:00:54.320
and then finally to discuss the evolution of presidential war powers and what the original

14
00:00:54.320 --> 00:01:00.480
intent was and what has actually happened over the course of time.

15
00:01:00.480 --> 00:01:07.200
And among other things, I mentioned that, you know, explaining the president was thought

16
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:13.200
to have largely, I don't want to say entirely, a ceremonial office because he does have some

17
00:01:13.200 --> 00:01:19.020
important functions, but certainly much more so than the presidency that we have now.

18
00:01:19.020 --> 00:01:23.220
And that's, we can see that also by the way in the very fact that although the president

19
00:01:23.220 --> 00:01:30.620
in the constitution does have the authority to veto legislation, even that in early American

20
00:01:30.620 --> 00:01:35.180
history was viewed as a questionable exercise of presidential power. It was strictly legal

21
00:01:35.180 --> 00:01:42.020
of course, but at one point the Whig party actually in effect announced to people that

22
00:01:42.020 --> 00:01:47.500
if they elected the Whig candidate that he would not exercise the veto. So even that

23
00:01:47.500 --> 00:01:52.780
was viewed as questionable, the legislature should be deferred to.

24
00:01:52.780 --> 00:01:58.340
Now going over the question of presidential war powers, my intent was to show that the

25
00:01:58.340 --> 00:02:02.380
constitutional framework was one in which the overwhelming bulk of responsibility for

26
00:02:02.380 --> 00:02:07.980
foreign policy would reside in the legislative branch.

27
00:02:07.980 --> 00:02:12.580
And we can see that through the division of tasks pertaining to foreign policy, the vast

28
00:02:42.580 --> 00:03:05.580
of the Presidential War Power and particularly early examples that have at times been cited as forerunners of more modern examples of the exercise of presidential war power, such as the Quasi-War with France or the struggle against the Barbary Pirates, both of which I tried to show were in fact authorized by statute.

29
00:03:05.580 --> 00:03:12.180
In fact, a famous scholar of presidential war powers on the particular point of the quasi-war with France

30
00:03:12.180 --> 00:03:19.380
says that it's altogether false to argue that this was just a presidentially initiated, undeclared war.

31
00:03:19.380 --> 00:03:22.980
Again, continuing with Wormuth, he says,

32
00:03:22.980 --> 00:03:27.380
The fact is that President John Adams took absolutely no independent action.

33
00:03:27.380 --> 00:03:31.480
Congress passed a series of acts that amounted, so the Supreme Court said,

34
00:03:31.480 --> 00:03:36.480
to a Declaration of Imperfect War, and Adams complied with these statutes.

35
00:03:36.480 --> 00:03:40.480
Okay, well so now we'll just continue from there.

36
00:03:40.480 --> 00:03:47.480
I left off with a point pertaining to the Monroe Doctrine, and now there are still other things to discuss.

37
00:03:47.480 --> 00:03:55.480
Of course, the Mexican War naturally would arise in this context.

38
00:03:55.480 --> 00:03:59.480
The Mexican War, of course, is 1846-48.

39
00:03:59.480 --> 00:04:06.480
and on the eve of that war there were a number of grievances that Mexico had against the United States

40
00:04:06.480 --> 00:04:15.480
and a number of unresolved issues that the United States had with Mexico involving unpaid debts to American citizens

41
00:04:15.480 --> 00:04:22.480
involving the desire on the part of the U.S. administration to acquire some Mexican territory like California for instance

42
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:28.480
there was a desire to have territory on the west coast so that therefore it would be easier to, among other things

43
00:04:28.480 --> 00:04:37.480
The Mexican government was reluctant to part with territory.

44
00:04:37.480 --> 00:04:41.480
The Mexican government also had a standing grievance, of course, over the issue of Texas.

45
00:04:41.480 --> 00:04:46.480
Texas had declared its independence as early as 1836.

46
00:04:46.480 --> 00:04:51.480
Mexico had initially recognized that independence, but really only under duress.

47
00:04:51.480 --> 00:04:57.780
under duress. I mean, almost literally, the Mexican ruler Santa Ana, in effect, practically

48
00:04:57.780 --> 00:05:03.300
had a knife to his throat at the hands of Texas independence fighters who said to him,

49
00:05:03.300 --> 00:05:07.820
do you recognize Texas independence? And of course he said yes. But then as soon as he

50
00:05:07.820 --> 00:05:13.480
got away, he said, of course, I don't recognize it. So for nine years, the Republic of Texas

51
00:05:13.480 --> 00:05:19.800
considered itself to be an independent republic, but Mexico did not recognize that independence.

52
00:05:19.800 --> 00:05:24.800
It was only in 1845 that you got the United States annexing Texas.

53
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:29.800
Texas had applied for admission to the Union several times and been denied each time.

54
00:05:29.800 --> 00:05:34.800
It had been denied by Andrew Jackson and I believe Van Buren.

55
00:05:34.800 --> 00:05:39.800
And then initially there was an attempt by John Tyler that was not successful.

56
00:05:39.800 --> 00:05:46.800
But then practically the last thing that John Tyler did before he left office was that he managed by joint resolution

57
00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:55.080
to get Texas annexed. Tyler was obsessed, it seems, with securing a place for himself

58
00:05:55.080 --> 00:05:59.960
in history, and he thought that the annexation of Texas would do just that. So he managed

59
00:05:59.960 --> 00:06:04.600
to do that, and that was in the wake of the election of James Polk. Since Polk had been

60
00:06:04.600 --> 00:06:10.200
in favor of Texas annexation, Tyler could in effect go to Congress now, and he wouldn't

61
00:06:10.200 --> 00:06:14.600
have to say it in so many words, but we've now seen through a presidential election that

62
00:06:14.600 --> 00:06:19.400
There does seem to be, since Polk is quite clear that he was an expansionist and he wanted Texas,

63
00:06:19.400 --> 00:06:23.400
there seems to be popular support for this, so let's go ahead and enact it.

64
00:06:23.400 --> 00:06:28.100
Well, of course, the Mexican government considers this yet another insult,

65
00:06:28.100 --> 00:06:33.500
but more specifically, there was a dispute over what the precise southern boundary of Texas was.

66
00:06:33.500 --> 00:06:41.000
Was it the Rio Grande River that it is today, of course, or was it the Nueces River, which was much further north?

67
00:06:41.000 --> 00:06:46.200
So there was a disputed amount of territory, regardless of the overall disposition of Texas

68
00:06:46.200 --> 00:06:49.800
and it's having declared independence and whether Mexico considered that legitimate or not,

69
00:06:49.800 --> 00:06:53.700
there was the more specific question of what is the southern border of Texas,

70
00:06:53.700 --> 00:06:58.300
even if it is a fait accompli that it's now part of the US, which border is the legitimate one.

71
00:06:58.300 --> 00:07:01.800
So there was a disputed area.

72
00:07:01.800 --> 00:07:07.100
There was an attempt by Polk's administration to resolve these outstanding issues through negotiation

73
00:07:07.100 --> 00:07:11.580
by sending John Slydell, a diplomat, down to Mexico to discuss them.

74
00:07:11.580 --> 00:07:14.220
But the Slydell mission was a complete failure.

75
00:07:14.220 --> 00:07:19.820
In effect, no Mexican government would really dare to meet with an American official at that point

76
00:07:19.820 --> 00:07:22.540
for fear of being overthrown by an angry population.

77
00:07:22.540 --> 00:07:25.340
So Slydell had to return empty handed.

78
00:07:26.380 --> 00:07:33.180
And it seems quite clear the Polk administration wanted the Mexican government

79
00:07:33.180 --> 00:07:44.180
The United States' decision to counter that aggression would be perceived as an act of self-defense.

80
00:07:44.180 --> 00:07:47.180
I know this is a very familiar story, of course.

81
00:07:47.180 --> 00:07:54.180
Well, Polk didn't have to worry about it, because apparently at a cabinet meeting there was talk in the White House

82
00:07:54.180 --> 00:07:59.180
of what can we do to manipulate the Mexicans into firing the first shot,

83
00:07:59.180 --> 00:08:02.180
The First Shot, but they found out that the Mexicans had already fired a shot.

84
00:08:02.180 --> 00:08:05.180
Well, that solves that issue.

85
00:08:05.180 --> 00:08:14.180
And President Polk said to the country that Mexico has shed American blood upon American soil.

86
00:08:14.180 --> 00:08:23.180
Well, it so happens that this was the term of office in which Abraham Lincoln was in the Congress.

87
00:08:23.180 --> 00:08:28.180
And Lincoln, during his term, introduced something called the spot resolution into Congress.

88
00:08:28.180 --> 00:08:58.180
The spot resolution consisted of a demand that Polk clarify for the country the exact spot on which American forces had been fired upon because Lincoln and others suspected that in fact what had happened was that American troops had been placed not along the Nueces River but in fact in the disputed area in which it was, if not a certainty, then a very great likelihood that they could provoke an attack because Mexico did not

89
00:08:58.180 --> 00:09:07.180
So what was the spot? Lincoln wanted to know. Where were those shots fired on Americans?

90
00:09:07.180 --> 00:09:13.180
Well, eventually it became clear that the shot was fired in the disputed territory,

91
00:09:13.180 --> 00:09:19.180
and that Polk, in effect, had sent troops into territory where it must have been foreseen

92
00:09:19.180 --> 00:09:24.180
that the consequence would be at least some kind of battle, if not war.

93
00:09:24.180 --> 00:09:34.180
Well, Polk, in effect, said to Congress, war exists. But nevertheless, Congress, two days later, officially declared war.

94
00:09:34.180 --> 00:09:46.180
But in 1848, the war ends in 1848, Congress voted 85 to 81 to censure President Polk and declared that the war had been

95
00:09:46.180 --> 00:09:51.980
had been quote, unnecessarily and unconstitutionally begun by the President of the United States

96
00:09:51.980 --> 00:09:55.700
because of the results of that spot resolution.

97
00:09:55.700 --> 00:10:00.220
Now that is significant because again there are people in American history who aren't

98
00:10:00.220 --> 00:10:06.740
afraid to say obvious things to a president and who censure presidents for things other

99
00:10:06.740 --> 00:10:14.780
than things we've seen them be censured for in recent years.

100
00:10:14.780 --> 00:10:20.300
Now following the Mexican War, we have an incident of, to my mind, rather great significance

101
00:10:20.300 --> 00:10:23.460
in Nicaragua in the 1850s.

102
00:10:23.460 --> 00:10:27.100
Now there's nothing in the Constitution that gives the president the authority to protect

103
00:10:27.100 --> 00:10:30.860
American lives and property abroad.

104
00:10:30.860 --> 00:10:37.220
But on many occasions, presidents have exercised authority for that purpose.

105
00:10:37.220 --> 00:10:42.200
And they haven't typically cited, you know, they haven't said that, you know, Congress

106
00:10:42.200 --> 00:10:44.500
has authorized me to do this.

107
00:10:44.500 --> 00:10:49.900
Accordingly, they have claimed that there are certain executive powers that are implied in the very nature of the executive.

108
00:10:49.900 --> 00:10:57.500
And one of those powers is the power to protect American lives and property, including business property, abroad.

109
00:10:57.500 --> 00:11:02.900
But one example of a president carrying out this power occurs in 1854,

110
00:11:02.900 --> 00:11:08.400
in the Nicaraguan port of Grey Town, which is no longer called Grey Town.

111
00:11:08.400 --> 00:11:12.300
It's called San Juan del Norte, but that time it was called Grey Town.

112
00:11:12.300 --> 00:11:20.300
Now, an American ship was ordered to that port because local authorities in the town of Grey Town, which is a small town,

113
00:11:20.300 --> 00:11:25.300
had, number one, insulted an American diplomat down there,

114
00:11:25.300 --> 00:11:34.300
and number two, had carried out really quite inexcusable acts of aggression against American property.

115
00:11:34.300 --> 00:11:38.300
They had destroyed some buildings of an American firm, for example.

116
00:11:38.300 --> 00:11:45.300
and all these complaints about property losses and this affront to an American diplomat

117
00:11:45.300 --> 00:11:52.420
led to this call for an American ship to go to this port and in effect demand some kind

118
00:11:52.420 --> 00:11:55.460
of restitution from the locals.

119
00:11:55.460 --> 00:12:01.740
Well when the American commander decided that these local folks had not made appropriate

120
00:12:01.740 --> 00:12:08.220
amends for their misdeeds, he went ahead and bombarded the town and he bombarded it for

121
00:12:08.220 --> 00:12:12.460
After 45 minutes, then he'd stop and wait to see, are you people going to give in? No.

122
00:12:12.460 --> 00:12:17.060
Then he'd bombard it again. Then he'd wait a while. Are you people going to give in? No.

123
00:12:17.060 --> 00:12:21.960
Then he'd bombard it again. The people, since they'd been warned, the people themselves

124
00:12:21.960 --> 00:12:28.620
had been evacuated, so thankfully no one was killed. But when finally, after several times

125
00:12:28.620 --> 00:12:34.700
of pausing to see if anyone was going to make any kind of official surrender or any kind

126
00:12:34.700 --> 00:12:44.700
American forces finally went ashore and burned down every remaining building in the whole town.

127
00:12:44.700 --> 00:12:50.700
Now, President Franklin Pierce reported this to Congress,

128
00:12:50.700 --> 00:12:55.700
and he spoke very highly of what the American commander had done in this incident.

129
00:12:55.700 --> 00:12:56.700
He said,

130
00:13:04.700 --> 00:13:34.700
by this procedure he afforded them opportunity to provide for their personal safety to those also who desired to avoid loss of property in the punishment about to be inflicted on the offending town he furnished the means of removing their effects to boats of his own ship and of a steamer which he procured and tendered to them for that purpose so you see that's not so bad just you if you can bombard the town as long as you have action

131
00:13:34.700 --> 00:13:49.700
In 1860, a Federal Circuit Court declared that the commander's actions were in fact defensible, and they were an extension of the executive branch's authority to protect lives and property in foreign countries.

132
00:13:49.700 --> 00:14:00.700
were in fact defensible, and they were an extension of the executive branch's authority to protect lives and property in foreign countries.

133
00:14:00.700 --> 00:14:01.700
The court said,

134
00:14:01.700 --> 00:14:14.700
Now, as it respects the interposition of the executive abroad for the protection of the lives or property of the citizen, the duty must of necessity rest in the discretion of the president.

135
00:14:14.700 --> 00:14:28.700
Acts of lawless violence or of threatened violence to the citizens or his property cannot be anticipated and provided for, and the protection, to be effectual or of any avail, may not infrequently require the most prompt and decided action.

136
00:14:28.700 --> 00:14:35.700
So that if American property is to be protected, then not infrequently that may require the most prompt and decided action.

137
00:14:35.700 --> 00:14:38.700
So, in other words, the destruction of Grey Town.

138
00:14:38.700 --> 00:14:48.700
Now, what's interesting is that James Buchanan at that time was an American diplomat who was speaking to the British government about this incident.

139
00:14:48.700 --> 00:14:54.700
And he assured them, he was absolutely certain that this must just have been the action of a rogue commander

140
00:14:54.700 --> 00:14:59.700
and that the U.S. government would certainly disavow this behavior.

141
00:14:59.700 --> 00:15:06.700
But then he found out from the Secretary of State that no, in fact, the U.S. government was going to defend what this commander had done to that town.

142
00:15:06.700 --> 00:15:10.700
And so poor James Buchanan has to turn around to the British government and say,

143
00:15:10.700 --> 00:15:13.700
Oh, all right, well, remember what I said yesterday? Forget that.

144
00:15:13.700 --> 00:15:15.700
We are defending this position.

145
00:15:15.700 --> 00:15:19.700
So it's sort of an embarrassing situation for poor Buchanan to be in.

146
00:15:19.700 --> 00:15:26.700
Well, once James Buchanan himself became president, you know, and was inaugurated in 1857,

147
00:15:26.700 --> 00:15:34.700
he himself spoke about what had happened at Grey Town and what exactly the powers of the president were

148
00:15:34.700 --> 00:15:37.700
in regard to the protection of American property abroad.

149
00:15:37.700 --> 00:15:41.700
And he said that the executive branch, quote,

150
00:15:41.700 --> 00:15:45.700
in its intercourse with foreign nations is limited to the employment of diplomacy alone.

151
00:15:45.700 --> 00:16:00.700
The President cannot legitimately resort to force without the direct authority of Congress, except in resisting and repelling hostile attacks.

152
00:16:00.700 --> 00:16:10.700
There again is the absolute mainstream view that the President can engage in defensive action but cannot initiate on his own authority offensive action.

153
00:16:10.700 --> 00:16:16.100
And speaking specifically about what had happened in Grey Town, Buchanan said that the president

154
00:16:16.100 --> 00:16:21.980
quote, have no authority to enter the territories of Nicaragua even to prevent the destruction

155
00:16:21.980 --> 00:16:26.900
of the transit, that was the company that was attacked, and protect the lives and property

156
00:16:26.900 --> 00:16:34.600
of our own citizens on their passage. And he went on to say in 1859 that although countries

157
00:16:34.600 --> 00:16:38.820
like Great Britain and France that he called executive governments because their executive

158
00:16:38.820 --> 00:16:46.020
branches were so vigorous. He said they could actually use military force to defend life

159
00:16:46.020 --> 00:16:50.180
and property of their citizens. But he said, quote, not so the executive government of

160
00:16:50.180 --> 00:16:55.980
the United States. He said that if the United States president sends a vessel of war to

161
00:16:55.980 --> 00:17:02.520
some port in order to obtain redress for grievances, he said, quote, the offending parties are

162
00:17:02.520 --> 00:17:07.840
well aware that in case of refusal, the commander can do no more than remonstrate. He can resort

163
00:17:07.840 --> 00:17:37.840
Now, a little bit later, Congress in fact legislated on this matter of the power of the President protecting the lives and property of Americans and in 1868 there was legislation passed that is still in effect to this day, that in effect limits what the power of the

164
00:17:37.840 --> 00:17:49.840
The president can demand of a foreign government an explanation for its behavior or depriving an American citizen of his freedom or property.

165
00:17:49.840 --> 00:17:53.840
The president can demand the release of a citizen who is being unjustly held.

166
00:17:53.840 --> 00:18:00.840
He can use means not amounting to acts of war to obtain the release.

167
00:18:00.840 --> 00:18:04.840
Anything further than that would require congressional authorization.

168
00:18:04.840 --> 00:18:13.840
So here was a loophole and Congress was reasonably, with reasonable dispatch, filled the loophole.

169
00:18:15.840 --> 00:18:23.840
Okay, I already mentioned during the question session last time about what happened in the 1890s in the situation with Cuba.

170
00:18:23.840 --> 00:18:29.840
Spain had Cuba as a colony and was, in order to fight a guerrilla war there,

171
00:18:29.840 --> 00:18:59.840
In fact, when they were there, they were engaged in sometimes quite terrible tactics that became known to Americans, and that under the second term of Grover Cleveland, there was this agitation for war on the part of some congressmen, and Cleveland in effect said that even if you declared war, he would simply not mobilize the army as commander-in-chief, so I don't know if that would ever happen. It's just very hard for me to imagine a state of affairs in the country where the Congress would declare war

172
00:18:59.840 --> 00:19:09.840
I just can't imagine it happening, but it's interesting that it nearly happened here and it goes to show what would happen in the case of such a situation.

173
00:19:09.840 --> 00:19:17.840
Now also in that decade we get an incident that is easily overlooked because it seems on the surface of it to be relatively minor,

174
00:19:17.840 --> 00:19:23.840
but it does have significant implications for presidential war powers and that's something called the Boxer Rebellion.

175
00:19:23.840 --> 00:19:43.840
The people known as the boxers were called the boxers, because they were anti-foreign Chinese fighters who resented the fact that foreigners were in effect carving up their country, were acquiring for themselves what are called extra-territorial privileges in their country, and they resented that.

176
00:19:43.840 --> 00:19:50.840
Sometimes they're called xenophobic, but I think it's at least moderately understandable why they'd be upset about what was happening in their country,

177
00:19:50.840 --> 00:20:20.840
The Boxers could turn violent, they were Christian missionaries, Chinese converts, French and Belgian engineers, a German diplomat, all these types of people were targeted, and in the case of a German minister, was killed in 1900, and in response to that, several nations sent troops to restore order in China, and in the case of a German minister, was killed in 1900, and in response to that, several nations sent troops to restore order in China,

178
00:20:20.840 --> 00:20:39.840
The Chinese translation of their organization's name ends with the words harmonious fists.

179
00:20:39.840 --> 00:20:45.640
Well, in any case, President McKinley, U.S. President McKinley, contributed 5,000 American troops.

180
00:20:45.640 --> 00:20:48.240
Now, this is an apparently minor action.

181
00:20:48.240 --> 00:20:53.240
But Walter Lefebvre, who's a great historian at Cornell, notes this.

182
00:20:53.240 --> 00:20:59.340
He says, McKinley took a historic step in creating a new 20th century presidential power.

183
00:20:59.340 --> 00:21:04.940
He dispatched the 5,000 troops without consulting Congress, let alone obtaining a declaration of war,

184
00:21:04.940 --> 00:21:09.040
to fight the boxers who were supported by the Chinese government.

185
00:21:09.040 --> 00:21:12.520
Presidents had previously used such force against non-governmental groups

186
00:21:12.520 --> 00:21:15.160
that threatened U.S. interests and citizens.

187
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:17.960
It was now used, however, against recognized governments

188
00:21:17.960 --> 00:21:22.920
and without obeying the Constitution's provisions about who was to declare war.

189
00:21:22.920 --> 00:21:26.800
But because it was such a minor action, hardly anyone really gave it much notice at the time,

190
00:21:26.800 --> 00:21:30.920
although in retrospect we can appreciate its significance.

191
00:21:30.920 --> 00:21:36.960
Oh my gosh, I almost consumed that. I'll explain this all to you later.

192
00:21:36.960 --> 00:21:45.960
I don't even know what's in that glass, sick people, sick, deranged people at the Mises Institute, that's right.

193
00:21:45.960 --> 00:21:57.960
Unbelievable. Okay, let's carry on, shall we? Let's think about World War I instead of this mysterious chemistry experiment that is up next to me at the lecture.

194
00:21:57.960 --> 00:22:08.960
World War I, okay. It is true that President Wilson went to Congress and got a declaration of war to get into World War I.

195
00:22:08.960 --> 00:22:15.960
But there's still some things we can say about Wilson with regard to war powers and also related to World War I.

196
00:22:15.960 --> 00:22:21.960
Because, as I think many people realize, one of Wilson's great dreams was to establish the League of Nations,

197
00:22:21.960 --> 00:22:23.960
The League of Nations

198
00:22:51.960 --> 00:22:58.960
Well, the League of Nations created some controversy in the United States because of Article 10 of the Covenant of the League of Nations and the relevant portion reads,

199
00:23:21.960 --> 00:23:37.960
Well, that's not actually a very precise statement, because does it mean, I mean, from the American point of view, the question was, on the part of many sceptics,

200
00:23:37.960 --> 00:23:44.960
does this obligate the United States to involve itself in every conceivable conflict that could break out between members of the League of Nations?

201
00:23:44.960 --> 00:23:49.960
I mean, what if it's an obscure border dispute that Americans don't even understand?

202
00:23:49.960 --> 00:23:56.260
Would they have some kind of obligation, enforceable obligation, or any kind of obligation, to enter?

203
00:23:56.260 --> 00:24:03.760
And could the president send troops into such a war and claim that he had the right to do so on his own authority,

204
00:24:03.760 --> 00:24:07.860
because, hey, after all, I'm just fulfilling our obligations under the League of Nations?

205
00:24:07.860 --> 00:24:11.760
There was concern about this. There was a desire for clarification.

206
00:24:11.760 --> 00:24:17.460
Now, most of the people who called for clarification of Article 10 of the League of Nations Covenant

207
00:24:17.460 --> 00:24:19.460
were not isolationists.

208
00:24:19.460 --> 00:24:22.260
It's a terrible misleading word anyway.

209
00:24:22.260 --> 00:24:25.860
But most of these people were not non-interventionists.

210
00:24:25.860 --> 00:24:29.380
There really weren't very many non-interventionists.

211
00:24:29.380 --> 00:24:31.820
Most of these people were what we would maybe today

212
00:24:31.820 --> 00:24:36.220
call foreign policy realists, people who say that we should

213
00:24:36.220 --> 00:24:38.860
intervene in this or that place, but only in pursuit

214
00:24:38.860 --> 00:24:41.780
of American interests, whereas the Wilson types would be more

215
00:24:41.780 --> 00:24:43.620
likely to say, well, we should intervene if we think we can

216
00:24:43.620 --> 00:24:45.180
advance democracy, and that sort of thing.

217
00:24:45.180 --> 00:24:51.660
So, they were all interventionists with relatively few exceptions, but still it is an important

218
00:24:51.660 --> 00:25:00.900
point that the so-called realists or the opponents of the League said, like Henry Cabot Lodge

219
00:25:00.900 --> 00:25:03.660
of Massachusetts was concerned about this.

220
00:25:03.660 --> 00:25:07.760
So Lodge has named after him the Lodge Reservations.

221
00:25:07.760 --> 00:25:12.940
They wanted to insert into the covenant of the League of Nations certain reservations.

222
00:25:12.940 --> 00:25:29.940
The United States assumes no obligation to preserve the territorial integrity or political independence of any other country under the provisions of Article 10, or to employ the military or naval forces of the United States under any article of the treaty for any purpose,

223
00:25:29.940 --> 00:25:37.940
except in any particular case in which Congress, which possess the exclusive right to declare war, shall so provide.

224
00:25:37.940 --> 00:25:51.940
And the preamble to the list of lodge reservations also provided that American ratification of the Treaty of Versailles would not take effect until at least three of the four major allied powers should officially accept these reservations.

225
00:25:51.940 --> 00:25:59.940
Now, Wilson did not favor any such clarification of Article 10, in effect, which he viewed as a watering down of Article 10.

226
00:25:59.940 --> 00:26:22.940
I am not one of those who, when they go into a concert for the peace of the world, want to sit close to the door with their hand on the knob and constantly trying the door to see that it is not locked. If we want to go into this thing, and we do want to go into it, we will go in it with our whole hearts and subtle purpose to stand by the great enterprise to the end.

227
00:26:22.940 --> 00:26:29.940
Well, Wilson came back to the United States, criss-crossed the nation to gain support for the treaty,

228
00:26:29.940 --> 00:26:33.940
and was routinely accusing his opponents of just ignorance or malice,

229
00:26:33.940 --> 00:26:36.940
because these are the only explanations for why someone would oppose this.

230
00:26:36.940 --> 00:26:41.940
In fact, for people who said to Wilson,

231
00:26:41.940 --> 00:26:45.940
we're afraid the League of Nations will compromise American sovereignty,

232
00:26:45.940 --> 00:26:47.940
Wilson said that he looked forward to the day,

233
00:26:47.940 --> 00:26:52.740
quote, when men would be just as eager partisans of the sovereignty of mankind

234
00:26:52.740 --> 00:26:55.740
as they were now of their own national sovereignty.

235
00:26:57.740 --> 00:27:01.740
And as people are collapsing in the audience out here as I read this,

236
00:27:02.740 --> 00:27:05.740
former president William Howard Taft,

237
00:27:05.740 --> 00:27:08.740
we all remember William Howard Taft who supported the League,

238
00:27:08.740 --> 00:27:12.140
nevertheless was aghast at Wilson's behavior.

239
00:27:12.140 --> 00:27:15.940
He said it is impossible for him to explain the League

240
00:27:15.940 --> 00:27:20.420
without framing contemptuous phrases to characterize his opponents.

241
00:27:20.420 --> 00:27:26.700
The president's attitude in not consenting to any reservations at all is an impossible one.

242
00:27:26.700 --> 00:27:29.860
Thomas Fleming, not the editor of Chronicles, but the historian,

243
00:27:29.860 --> 00:27:33.220
Thomas Fleming writes in his book, The Illusion of Victory,

244
00:27:33.220 --> 00:27:36.940
a book that's hated by all the bad guys because it's revisionist on World War I,

245
00:27:36.940 --> 00:27:41.300
as if it takes a lot of courage to be revisionist on World War I.

246
00:27:41.300 --> 00:27:45.100
My gosh, obviously World War I is idiotic and foolish.

247
00:27:45.100 --> 00:27:51.260
The more the president talked, says Fleming, the more he convinced a majority of the senators

248
00:27:51.260 --> 00:27:55.600
that the treaty needed these reservations to protect the country against a league of

249
00:27:55.600 --> 00:28:00.940
nations run by a leader like Woodrow Wilson, a wild-eyed idealist who would embroil the

250
00:28:00.940 --> 00:28:05.460
country in bizarre attempts to perfect the world without the consent of the American

251
00:28:05.460 --> 00:28:10.500
people.

252
00:28:10.500 --> 00:28:16.260
Just about 20 years later, 1936, there's a key Supreme Court decision that has been

253
00:28:16.260 --> 00:28:22.940
seized upon by supporters of a vigorous executive power in foreign policy.

254
00:28:22.940 --> 00:28:27.340
And that's the case of United States versus Curtis Wright Export Corporation, or we just

255
00:28:27.340 --> 00:28:32.500
simply call it Curtis Wright.

256
00:28:32.500 --> 00:28:39.040
Some have said that this could well be the most frequently cited case involving the question

257
00:28:39.040 --> 00:29:09.040
The case in and of itself deals with an extremely minor issue. It deals with the issue of whether it was constitutional for a joint resolution to be passed authorizing the president to halt arms sales to Bolivia and Paraguay, so it doesn't, on the surface of it, seem that it's going to have momentous consequences, but as we know, justices sometimes engage in obiter dicta, where they'll just go on to discuss other matters

258
00:29:09.040 --> 00:29:18.040
The Dicta is occurring when you have a case where the justice has no jurisdiction to hear the case, but still goes on, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

259
00:29:18.040 --> 00:29:30.040
Okay, like John Marshall in Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia, he says, I can't hear this case because the Cherokees are not American citizens, but let me tell you my opinion anyway, that would be considered dicta.

260
00:29:30.040 --> 00:29:35.540
Because the Cherokees are not American citizens, but, let me tell you my opinion anyway, that would be considered dicta.

261
00:29:35.540 --> 00:29:40.040
And sometimes the important sections of the Dred Scott decision are considered the same way,

262
00:29:40.040 --> 00:29:45.040
because if Roger Taney doesn't think Dred Scott is a citizen, that should just end the discussion.

263
00:29:45.040 --> 00:29:48.040
If that's his opinion, then he has no authority to hear the case.

264
00:29:48.040 --> 00:29:53.040
He should not go on for 45 single-spaced pages talking about slavery in the territories.

265
00:29:53.040 --> 00:29:55.040
He would have saved everybody a lot of grief.

266
00:29:55.040 --> 00:30:02.040
Well, it's the dicta of this decision that caused all kinds of controversy and mischief.

267
00:30:02.040 --> 00:30:08.040
Now, the court's decision was composed by Justice George Sutherland.

268
00:30:08.040 --> 00:30:14.040
And it's been said, it was later said by Professor Thomas Reed Powell at the Harvard Law School.

269
00:30:14.040 --> 00:30:19.040
He told his students, just because Mr. Justice Sutherland writes clearly,

270
00:30:19.040 --> 00:30:22.040
you must not suppose that he thinks clearly.

271
00:30:22.040 --> 00:30:36.040
In effect, what Justice Sutherland says is that domestic and foreign powers of the U.S. government derive from different sources.

272
00:30:36.040 --> 00:30:38.040
They don't all derive from the Constitution.

273
00:30:38.040 --> 00:30:41.040
He says that domestic powers derive from the Constitution.

274
00:30:41.040 --> 00:30:45.040
The states delegate powers in Article 1, Section 8, to the Congress.

275
00:30:45.040 --> 00:30:51.040
Foreign policy powers, though, are different, he says, because those powers, he claims,

276
00:30:51.040 --> 00:30:56.040
powers of external sovereignty, and then to use his words, passed from the crown,

277
00:30:56.040 --> 00:31:02.040
the British crown, not to the colonies severally, but to the colonies in their collective capacity

278
00:31:02.040 --> 00:31:06.040
of the United States of America. And so therefore, foreign policy powers,

279
00:31:06.040 --> 00:31:10.040
because they come to the US central government directly from the crown,

280
00:31:10.040 --> 00:31:15.040
are not dependent upon any constitutional grant.

281
00:31:15.040 --> 00:31:20.040
Now, that's a strange statement, first of all, for a number of reasons that I'll get to in a second.

282
00:31:20.040 --> 00:31:27.040
But even if we accepted this as true, even if we accepted that somehow only domestic powers are delegated by the Constitution,

283
00:31:27.040 --> 00:31:34.040
whereas foreign policy powers come right from the Crown and don't need any particular grant from the Constitution,

284
00:31:34.040 --> 00:31:38.040
that still doesn't explain why the President would be the one who would exercise those powers.

285
00:31:38.040 --> 00:31:41.040
I mean, why wouldn't we still have the Congress exercising them?

286
00:31:41.040 --> 00:31:45.040
I mean, it doesn't answer really the question that's at hand.

287
00:31:45.040 --> 00:31:52.040
But more than that, this idea that powers were passing from the Crown to the United States in the aggregate

288
00:31:52.040 --> 00:31:55.040
can be refuted by some of the evidence we looked at earlier this week.

289
00:31:55.040 --> 00:32:00.040
Because there is no United States government that acts in the aggregate in 1776,

290
00:32:00.040 --> 00:32:05.040
or even in the early 1780s, I should say, when the war is concluded.

291
00:32:05.040 --> 00:32:15.040
The British recognized thirteen separate sovereign states, states that exercised attributes of, and made clear they possessed attributes of sovereignty.

292
00:32:15.040 --> 00:32:22.040
We have the Articles of Confederation saying that the states retain their entire sovereignty, freedom and independence.

293
00:32:22.040 --> 00:32:28.040
And we also have Federalist No. 45. In Federalist No. 45, James Madison says,

294
00:32:28.040 --> 00:32:33.040
He says, the powers delegated by the proposed constitution are few and defined.

295
00:32:33.040 --> 00:32:37.040
And he says they will be exercised principally on external objects

296
00:32:37.040 --> 00:32:40.040
as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce.

297
00:32:40.040 --> 00:32:45.040
So he clearly says that these things are in fact being delegated to the federal government.

298
00:32:45.040 --> 00:32:49.040
So this isn't just me being flippant and maybe I should take this guy more seriously.

299
00:32:49.040 --> 00:32:52.040
This is a bizarre decision. There's no other way of looking at it.

300
00:32:52.040 --> 00:32:55.040
And yet it's been cited again and again in favor of the idea

301
00:32:55.040 --> 00:33:05.040
The President has a very, very broad discretion at his disposal and, of course, in fact, he does not.

302
00:33:05.040 --> 00:33:11.040
So that's the Curtis Wright decision. Somebody should announce it more often, I think.

303
00:33:11.040 --> 00:33:18.040
Now, we start to get the modern view, of course, is really that there are hardly any restraints on the President worth mentioning.

304
00:33:18.040 --> 00:33:24.040
It's true that there was a War Powers Resolution, more commonly known as the War Powers Act of 1973,

305
00:33:24.040 --> 00:33:43.040
The watershed point was the Korean War, 1950-53, because that war breaks out, North Korea invades South Korea, and the United Nations condemns this and authorizes use of force, and so Harry Truman commits American forces to battle in the Korean War of 1950-53.

306
00:33:43.040 --> 00:33:57.040
Harry Truman commits American forces to battle in the Korean War without securing a declaration of war from Congress.

307
00:33:57.040 --> 00:34:03.040
Why does he not get a declaration of war? Because he says it is not a war, it is a U.N. police action.

308
00:34:03.040 --> 00:34:08.040
Therefore I don't need a declaration of war because it's not a war, it's a police action.

309
00:34:08.040 --> 00:34:31.040
Okay, well, you can assess the strength of that argument, if you like, but in effect, he is doing exactly what opponents of the League of Nations feared that a president might do, claiming that the authority of this supranational organization obviates the need to go to the Congress, which is the branch of government in which is reposed the power to declare war.

310
00:34:31.040 --> 00:34:36.040
Now, there are some people, there were some people at the time who criticized this.

311
00:34:36.040 --> 00:34:42.040
One of them is Senator Robert Taft, a Republican from Ohio.

312
00:34:42.040 --> 00:34:46.040
He was called Mr. Republican, by the way. Mr. Republican.

313
00:34:46.040 --> 00:34:49.040
And here's what Mr. Republican said.

314
00:34:49.040 --> 00:34:55.040
My conclusion, therefore, is that in the case of Korea, where a war was already underway,

315
00:34:55.040 --> 00:35:01.040
We had no right to send troops to a nation with whom we had no treaty, to defend it against attack by another nation,

316
00:35:01.040 --> 00:35:06.040
no matter how unprincipled that aggression might be, unless the whole matter was submitted to Congress

317
00:35:06.040 --> 00:35:10.040
and a declaration of war or some other direct authority obtained.

318
00:35:10.040 --> 00:35:15.040
Very clear. This was stated by Mr. Republican.

319
00:35:15.040 --> 00:35:21.040
Whereas now Mr. Republican has become Congressman Ron Paul, in effect, in this sense of being Mr. Republican.

320
00:35:21.040 --> 00:35:51.040
and yet even on this point, even saying that the UN declaration, the UN authorization, this UN police action gives me the authority to intervene, even that is highly questionable at best because the relevant UN documents and UN charter make clear that when countries go to war in some way under the auspices of the United Nations, they nevertheless do so following the constitutional

321
00:36:21.040 --> 00:36:26.040
So this is before the Vietnam War. You're already seeing members of Congress arguing,

322
00:36:26.040 --> 00:36:33.040
and here's one such argument, that history will show that on more than 100 occasions in the life of this republic,

323
00:36:33.040 --> 00:36:38.040
the president as commander-in-chief has ordered the fleet or the troops to do certain things

324
00:36:38.040 --> 00:36:42.040
which involve the risk of war without seeking congressional consent.

325
00:36:42.040 --> 00:36:45.040
So this type of argument is raised.

326
00:36:45.040 --> 00:36:51.040
Well, this list of precedents, this hundred or so, or hundreds as other people will say,

327
00:36:51.040 --> 00:37:01.040
you will search in vain through that list of precedents for anything that comes anywhere near even one quarter of one percent of the significance of the Korean War.

328
00:37:01.040 --> 00:37:07.040
Edward Corwin, whom I cited earlier on Theodore Roosevelt, says this,

329
00:37:07.040 --> 00:37:12.040
says this, this list of alleged precedents for the President acting without the consent of Congress

330
00:37:12.040 --> 00:37:21.040
consists largely of quote, fights with pirates, landings of small naval contingents on barbarous or semi-barbarous coasts,

331
00:37:21.040 --> 00:37:30.040
the dispatch of small bodies of troops to chase bandits or cattle rustlers across the Mexican border and the like.

332
00:37:30.040 --> 00:37:35.040
This is what the neocons are relying on when they say, oh, there are all these precedents.

333
00:37:35.040 --> 00:37:38.040
Right. Chasing cattle rustlers across the Mexican border

334
00:37:38.040 --> 00:37:41.200
is a precedent for sending a half million troops to the Middle East.

335
00:37:41.200 --> 00:37:44.560
I mean, how does a brain compute that?

336
00:37:44.560 --> 00:37:46.440
I mean, how does that come out of a functioning brain?

337
00:37:46.440 --> 00:37:47.400
I don't understand that.

338
00:37:47.400 --> 00:37:50.040
But that's what they mean when they say,

339
00:37:50.040 --> 00:37:51.680
oh, gosh, you're just being too unreasonable.

340
00:37:51.680 --> 00:37:53.600
We've done this hundreds of times.

341
00:37:53.600 --> 00:37:55.840
Yes, if you want to count the cattle rustler thing,

342
00:37:55.840 --> 00:37:58.120
then it would be hundreds of times.

343
00:37:58.120 --> 00:38:02.920
If that's the point you want to make, I will yield it to you.

344
00:38:02.920 --> 00:38:08.720
Now Bill Clinton, to skip way ahead, I have to have just one little thing.

345
00:38:08.720 --> 00:38:14.320
I've been in this anti-Bill Clinton mode because in 1992 when he was elected,

346
00:38:14.320 --> 00:38:22.720
I think I drank my first beer that night because I was at that time the vice president of the Harvard Republicans.

347
00:38:22.720 --> 00:38:25.320
Yes. All right. You know, let's hear the hissing.

348
00:38:25.320 --> 00:38:27.220
And to me, this was like the world had ended.

349
00:38:27.220 --> 00:38:29.820
Like, I can't believe this happened. So I actually drank a beer.

350
00:38:29.820 --> 00:38:32.720
I mean, so it must have been absolutely catastrophic.

351
00:38:32.720 --> 00:38:38.120
And then, lately, I've been doing so much radio with people who want to talk about the Clintons.

352
00:38:38.120 --> 00:38:41.720
So, you know, I'll talk about any president because, you know, they've all been so miserable.

353
00:38:41.720 --> 00:38:44.220
You want to talk about Clinton? You know, fine, talk about him.

354
00:38:44.220 --> 00:38:50.820
But it's interesting to note that, you know, Clinton, of course, got away with stuff on this, on foreign policy,

355
00:38:50.820 --> 00:38:56.420
because the neocons aren't going to criticize Clinton for, you know, ignoring the congressional requirement

356
00:38:56.420 --> 00:39:00.120
to get a congressional declaration of war. Like, why would they care?

357
00:39:00.120 --> 00:39:03.620
The only thing that they would criticize him for typically is that he wasn't vicious enough.

358
00:39:03.620 --> 00:39:06.020
Like John McCain and Bill Kristol were saying,

359
00:39:06.020 --> 00:39:08.720
we've got to send ground troops into the Balkans.

360
00:39:08.720 --> 00:39:10.820
So the big opposition party was saying,

361
00:39:10.820 --> 00:39:15.220
yeah, Clinton's policy is correct, just not severe and harsh and savage enough.

362
00:39:15.220 --> 00:39:17.620
Well, there's an opposition party for you.

363
00:39:17.620 --> 00:39:23.420
Well, the reason I bring him up is that it's true that Congress was sort of sending mixed signals

364
00:39:23.420 --> 00:39:29.720
throughout the whole Balkan intervention in the early to mid-90s and then in Kosovo in 1999.

365
00:39:29.720 --> 00:39:36.720
In 1999, when Clinton was authorizing the bombing of the Serbs,

366
00:39:36.720 --> 00:39:44.720
you actually had a congressional resolution that voted against giving the president authority to bomb the Serbs in 1999.

367
00:39:44.720 --> 00:39:48.720
And Clinton went ahead with it regardless.

368
00:39:48.720 --> 00:39:54.720
There's a particular circle of constitutional hell reserved for somebody who does that.

369
00:39:54.720 --> 00:39:56.720
It's one thing to say, I've got all these presidential powers,

370
00:39:56.720 --> 00:40:09.720
And then when the Congress expressly says, we're not authorizing this, and then you say, well, I don't care because I'm the president, it does seem to be a violation of the traditional understanding of how war powers are allocated among the branches.

371
00:40:09.720 --> 00:40:17.720
But I think that's an example. But as I say, he'd get away with that because I still don't quite know what it was that the conservatives didn't like about Clinton.

372
00:40:17.720 --> 00:40:23.720
Okay, all right, he's a disgusting person. I agree with that. But most presidents are disgusting people, so there's nothing really unique there.

373
00:40:23.720 --> 00:40:28.720
He was reasonably restrained by modern standards in spending.

374
00:40:28.720 --> 00:40:35.720
He did reform welfare to some degree and he went to war a lot.

375
00:40:35.720 --> 00:40:37.720
He bombed a lot of places.

376
00:40:37.720 --> 00:40:40.720
I don't really see what the big problem is.

377
00:40:40.720 --> 00:40:48.720
It seems like the arguments against him are kind of silly.

378
00:40:48.720 --> 00:40:58.720
Anyway, now in our own modern time, by which I mean the past few years, obviously the current situation involves the invasion of Iraq.

379
00:40:58.720 --> 00:41:06.720
And there was, well, very muted, but nevertheless some attempt to oppose this on constitutional grounds.

380
00:41:06.720 --> 00:41:10.720
And to argue that the president is exercising power that he does not legitimately possess.

381
00:41:10.720 --> 00:41:27.720
The argument is as follows. When the Congress passes a resolution authorizing the use of force, actually more precisely, telling the president that, you know, we give you the authority to decide if and when you think you should go to war.

382
00:41:27.720 --> 00:41:32.720
The argument is that that is an unconstitutional delegation of power that belongs to Congress.

383
00:41:32.720 --> 00:41:39.120
It is supposed to remain with Congress to decide whether to go to war.

384
00:41:39.120 --> 00:41:42.120
You can't delegate to the president of the power whether to go to war.

385
00:41:42.120 --> 00:41:46.720
You can delegate to him certain limited tasks in directing and carrying out a war.

386
00:41:46.720 --> 00:41:51.720
But the decision is supposed to rest with the Congress.

387
00:41:51.720 --> 00:41:58.720
So I was just reading not long ago, there's a gentleman, 85-year-old former congressman from rural Nebraska,

388
00:41:58.720 --> 00:42:11.720
Clare Callen, U.S. Supreme Court declares that the president had no legal authority to go to war in Iraq.

389
00:42:11.720 --> 00:42:18.720
And he's carried on with this and he's got a number of arguments to that effect.

390
00:42:18.720 --> 00:42:23.720
And he's arguing it differently from how I would argue it.

391
00:42:23.720 --> 00:42:29.720
But he says that the resolution authorizing the president to use force that was passed in October 2002

392
00:42:29.720 --> 00:42:34.720
expressly invoked the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

393
00:42:34.720 --> 00:42:38.720
Now, among other things, the War Powers Resolution of 1973,

394
00:42:38.720 --> 00:42:44.720
that resolution contained provisions, for example, saying that the president,

395
00:42:44.720 --> 00:42:52.720
he can initiate aggressive action if an attack is imminent by another country.

396
00:43:22.720 --> 00:43:25.720
We almost are sure we heard him say that it was imminent, right?

397
00:43:25.720 --> 00:43:31.720
Well, interestingly, that works against the president in Callan's argumentations.

398
00:43:31.720 --> 00:43:35.720
He says, well, if you're going to admit the president never said it was imminent,

399
00:43:35.720 --> 00:43:37.720
well, then he's violating the War Powers Act,

400
00:43:37.720 --> 00:43:42.720
because he went to war against a country from whom the threat was, according to him, not imminent,

401
00:43:42.720 --> 00:43:44.720
according to his own words right now, not imminent.

402
00:43:44.720 --> 00:43:49.720
That's not the way I would pursue it, because then we'd just get presidents saying,

403
00:43:49.720 --> 00:43:52.720
The threat of an attack from Somalia is imminent.

404
00:43:52.720 --> 00:43:55.720
You know, I mean, they'll just say it, you know, and then what do you do?

405
00:43:55.720 --> 00:43:58.720
Another way of arguing it is the way that I've suggested,

406
00:43:58.720 --> 00:44:03.720
that the Congress has no authority to delegate this decision-making power.

407
00:44:03.720 --> 00:44:07.720
And there have been a number of attempts to bring to various federal courts

408
00:44:07.720 --> 00:44:09.720
to bring this issue and force it.

409
00:44:09.720 --> 00:44:14.720
And typically it's been dismissed or the lower courts say they have no jurisdiction.

410
00:44:14.720 --> 00:44:16.720
That's typically what happens to these cases.

411
00:44:16.720 --> 00:44:22.720
A couple of years ago, in early 2003, we did get a serious, you know, at least a number of serious attempts,

412
00:44:22.720 --> 00:44:34.720
largely by parents of people in the military who got together and they secured the cooperation of dozens of constitutional scholars who supported them,

413
00:44:34.720 --> 00:44:38.720
and in fact went ahead and initiated this legal challenge.

414
00:44:38.720 --> 00:44:45.720
And it's interesting that I was just reading about the mother of a 25-year-old Marine said this,

415
00:44:45.720 --> 00:44:50.720
When we look at the world community, we see that they had a debate in the parliament of Turkey.

416
00:44:50.720 --> 00:44:52.720
They had a debate in the parliament of Great Britain.

417
00:44:52.720 --> 00:44:58.720
They're having serious debates in legislative bodies all over the world, and yet there is no debate in Congress.

418
00:44:58.720 --> 00:45:10.720
And so she and parents of troops joined not only constitutional scholars, but also a dozen congressmen in this lawsuit,

419
00:45:10.720 --> 00:45:21.720
The president's purpose was to try to stop the president, obviously didn't work, from ordering an attack on Iraq without getting the constitutionally required congressional declaration of war.

420
00:45:21.720 --> 00:45:31.720
She said, if the rest of the world can debate this war, then America can as well. Our constitution requires that debate.

421
00:45:31.720 --> 00:45:39.720
And a legal consultant to the case made this point, that this is an unconstitutional delegation of power.

422
00:45:39.720 --> 00:45:45.720
Now, it's interesting that in addition to the law professors who signed on to a brief in support of the suit,

423
00:45:45.720 --> 00:45:50.720
U.S. Representative John Conyers from Michigan went on the record in support of it.

424
00:45:50.720 --> 00:45:54.720
Now, Conyers, as I recall, he's not a guy I'd want to have over for dinner,

425
00:45:54.720 --> 00:45:59.720
because actually there's almost no congressman I'd want to have over for dinner other than Ron Paul.

426
00:45:59.720 --> 00:46:07.720
But Conyers, as I recall, isn't he the guy in Fahrenheit 9-11 who said to Michael Moore,

427
00:46:07.720 --> 00:46:13.000
Michael Moore, you know, son, we don't have time to read all the legislation that comes before us.

428
00:46:13.800 --> 00:46:18.200
You know, how would we ever get anything done? I'm pretty sure that's John Conyers. Okay.

429
00:46:19.480 --> 00:46:24.460
I remember laughing out loud at that one. My gosh, do you realize what you're saying here?

430
00:46:24.960 --> 00:46:30.680
Well, this is what Conyers said. President Bush recently told journalists that whether we go to war,

431
00:46:30.920 --> 00:46:34.320
quote, is not up to you, it's up to me.

432
00:46:34.320 --> 00:46:43.720
The Founding Fathers, continues Conyers, in a rare reference to the Founding Fathers,

433
00:46:43.720 --> 00:46:47.520
did not establish an imperial presidency with war-making power.

434
00:46:47.520 --> 00:46:51.680
The Constitution clearly reserves that for Congress.

435
00:46:51.680 --> 00:46:55.960
I know he means to say that the Constitution reserves the war-making power for Congress,

436
00:46:55.960 --> 00:46:57.160
but it kind of sounds like it.

437
00:46:57.160 --> 00:47:00.960
If we're going to engage in imperialism, the Congress will do it, but obviously I know

438
00:47:00.960 --> 00:47:04.040
that's not what he means.

439
00:47:04.040 --> 00:47:18.040
What is odd in the universe, when I'm looking at a quotation from John Conyers and saying I don't see anything wrong with this statement, and it's really scaring the heck out of me that I'm in complete agreement with Conyers.

440
00:47:18.040 --> 00:47:28.040
Well, that in a nutshell is, that's the beginning of the, I think, an overview of the constitutional aspect, the background to that, how it's actually worked out in practice.

441
00:47:28.040 --> 00:47:42.040
I think this has been an answer to the, there have been hundreds of examples of the use of force by the President without getting Congressional authorization, that is a completely phony argument that could not possibly be advanced by somebody who is seriously looking for the truth.

442
00:47:42.040 --> 00:47:57.040
And then finally carrying things through to today, looking at the various arguments that have been cited in support of the alleged lack of a need to get a Congressional declaration of war, it's a police action, or I'm the Commander in Chief, that's the most recent one,

443
00:47:57.040 --> 00:48:01.040
I'm the commander-in-chief, so I can dispatch troops.

444
00:48:01.040 --> 00:48:06.040
No one in early American history believed that the commander-in-chief had that authority.

445
00:48:06.040 --> 00:48:08.040
Absolutely nobody.

446
00:48:08.040 --> 00:48:13.040
So today, in effect, what you have is arguments that are made on the assumption

447
00:48:13.040 --> 00:48:16.040
that the American population doesn't know any of this history,

448
00:48:16.040 --> 00:48:18.040
and so they can just easily be bamboozled.

449
00:48:18.040 --> 00:48:22.040
And I'm sorry to say that it has worked like a charm.

450
00:48:22.040 --> 00:48:27.040
Okay, so we end off on a totally depressing conclusion, right?

451
00:48:27.040 --> 00:48:34.040
War is inevitable, we can't do a thing to stop it, we've got crazed presidents, unrestrained by anything,

452
00:48:34.040 --> 00:48:37.040
but it's been a great pleasure talking to you.

453
00:48:37.040 --> 00:48:45.040
I remember when I listened to Ralph Reiko's seminar, he ended early on his last day for the sake of discussion,

454
00:48:45.040 --> 00:48:50.040
so I thought I would follow in the footsteps of the great Ralph Reiko.

455
00:48:50.040 --> 00:48:58.040
So, let's hear them. It could be on anything from the whole week or a comment about anything that you're interested in, anything at all. Yes, sir.

456
00:48:58.040 --> 00:49:04.040
Well, President Wilson had a personal advisor by the name of Hedwig Mandelhaus,

457
00:49:04.040 --> 00:49:06.040
with criteria as a lawful ego, in fact.

458
00:49:06.040 --> 00:49:07.040
Yes.

459
00:49:07.040 --> 00:49:13.040
I'm wondering because he seems to be an internationalist himself, great.

460
00:49:13.040 --> 00:49:18.040
Well, in fact, this had a lot to do with the League of Nations development, or the idea.

461
00:49:18.040 --> 00:49:22.040
I wonder if he didn't exert a tremendous amount of influence on Wilson.

462
00:49:22.040 --> 00:49:27.040
Well, I think the question involves so-called Colonel House.

463
00:49:27.040 --> 00:49:32.040
He was never in the military, Colonel House, but he was called Colonel House.

464
00:49:32.040 --> 00:49:34.040
He never had an official position in the White House,

465
00:49:34.040 --> 00:49:38.040
but Woodrow Wilson used to say that he was the first person he talked to in the morning,

466
00:49:38.040 --> 00:49:44.040
the last person he talked to before going to bed.

467
00:49:44.040 --> 00:49:49.040
I remember actually one of the things that, on the few times I had a chance to meet Murray Rothbard,

468
00:49:49.040 --> 00:49:54.040
he was concerned that there was no biography, there was no modern biography of House.

469
00:49:54.040 --> 00:49:58.040
And that was partly because the House papers were not available at that time, but they are available now.

470
00:49:58.040 --> 00:50:02.040
And I bet if you dug around the papers of this House character, you'd find some stuff.

471
00:50:02.040 --> 00:50:05.040
If he didn't burn them, of course, you'd find some interesting stuff.

472
00:50:05.040 --> 00:50:11.040
House wrote this novel anonymously, I think.

473
00:50:11.040 --> 00:50:13.040
Philip Drew, administrator.

474
00:50:13.040 --> 00:50:19.040
You know, it's sort of like a fantasy of, you know, suppose there were, you know, kind of like a military dictatorship in the U.S.

475
00:50:19.040 --> 00:50:22.040
What types of things would we want to force through on the country?

476
00:50:22.040 --> 00:50:26.040
And it pretty much consisted of, you know, the income tax and everything that in fact did happen.

477
00:50:26.040 --> 00:50:32.040
And so, you know, you read about this a lot, like the John Birch Society, for instance, has kept this book in print,

478
00:50:32.040 --> 00:50:38.040
as if to say, isn't it kind of odd that this guy has this daydream about what he'd ideally like to do with absolute power?

479
00:50:38.040 --> 00:50:41.040
And this is exactly what winds up happening.

480
00:50:41.040 --> 00:50:49.040
I don't think it's because House has a direct influence, but I think it's because he reflects the same way of thinking that all these, the way that they all think.

481
00:50:49.040 --> 00:51:01.040
I think that House plays a very substantial role in all this, but until somebody really digs around in his papers, we won't know exactly the precise nature of that role.

482
00:51:01.040 --> 00:51:04.040
There was a gentleman in the back, yes?

483
00:51:04.040 --> 00:51:08.040
I was going to ask you the same question you might be asking.

484
00:51:15.040 --> 00:51:19.040
I was going to ask you about Henry Hopkins too.

485
00:51:19.040 --> 00:51:23.040
How do you explain the Roosevelt myth?

486
00:51:34.040 --> 00:51:59.040
From your quotations of Lew Rockwell's work on the presidency and how he'd rather have a shadow of a president, we don't care who he is, nameless, faithless, what do we better have a president who drinks his presidency away or one that quibbles with Congress and brings better gear today?

487
00:52:04.040 --> 00:52:10.040
The President is a bad example to the kiddies, but you shouldn't be taking moral instruction from the president anyway.

488
00:52:10.040 --> 00:52:15.040
That's a disturbed idea in the first place.

489
00:52:15.040 --> 00:52:21.040
I know that Calvin Coolidge is not perfect, but he said some great things.

490
00:52:21.040 --> 00:52:27.040
Nobody ever went far wrong by just keeping his mouth shut or not doing anything.

491
00:52:27.040 --> 00:52:30.040
He would just say things like this over and over again.

492
00:52:30.040 --> 00:52:34.040
That just enrages some people, like, man, he should be doing this and that, whatever,

493
00:52:34.040 --> 00:52:40.440
but he just let people, you know, you do what you want to do, and if you insist on doing

494
00:52:40.440 --> 00:52:47.080
something via government, then let your state government take care of it, but it seems to

495
00:52:47.080 --> 00:52:50.520
me that was what the president was supposed to be like, so I guess I would favor that.

496
00:52:50.520 --> 00:52:56.680
Now Harding, he wasn't a drunk, but he did drink during Prohibition openly in the White

497
00:52:56.680 --> 00:53:04.520
House. So that's kind of not altogether off from the image that you're proposing and I think it was

498
00:53:04.520 --> 00:53:10.200
it was Theodore Roosevelt's daughter who later said that you know poor Warren Harding it's like

499
00:53:11.080 --> 00:53:14.840
well I don't want to say this on the tape but let's just say there we all know there were

500
00:53:14.840 --> 00:53:19.080
scandals associated with Harding and not just government scandals personal scandals and so

501
00:53:19.080 --> 00:53:23.080
one statement was this poor guy doesn't even know that beds have been invented yet because he keeps

502
00:53:23.080 --> 00:53:29.080
He keeps finding himself getting caught in compromising situations like in a closet and whatever.

503
00:53:29.080 --> 00:53:31.080
The guy doesn't even know beds have been invented yet.

504
00:53:31.080 --> 00:53:35.080
So I guess he frittered away his administration in other ways.

505
00:53:35.080 --> 00:53:41.080
But the hilarious thing is that although there was the Fed inflation and there shouldn't have been a Federal Reserve,

506
00:53:41.080 --> 00:53:46.080
nevertheless it was, economically, basically a pretty good decade.

507
00:53:46.080 --> 00:53:52.080
Excellent production figures, good unemployment figures, and historians seem to resent that.

508
00:53:52.080 --> 00:54:10.080
Isn't there some viciousness of Congress that would rise under a push over president?

509
00:54:22.080 --> 00:54:45.080
Okay, I have a question and then a comment. First, who was the Whig Party candidate who said that they would never have a veto?

510
00:54:52.080 --> 00:55:13.080
Well, my comment is, I'm going to do something that I, I don't think I've ever done before, but I'm going to defend some neoconservatives. So to be fair, some of them did oppose Costa Rica.

511
00:55:13.080 --> 00:55:24.080
And even Cliff Kincaid did, as Justin Raimondo pointed out after he was on MSNBC with him.

512
00:55:24.080 --> 00:55:29.080
Kincaid is crazed for the current war, but yeah, right, that is true.

513
00:55:29.080 --> 00:55:37.080
That is absolutely true, and I stand happily corrected on that because there were some people who were against those bombings.

514
00:55:37.080 --> 00:55:40.080
Because I remember at the time, now all the memories are rushing back to me.

515
00:55:40.080 --> 00:56:10.080
Two things, listening to you, it doesn't seem to be much point to have it in the Constitution, because it's going to be totally ignored, but the other thing, I can't remember who wrote it in Lew Rockwell's book, but the other thing, I can't remember who wrote it in Lew Rockwell's book, but the other thing, I can't remember who wrote it in Lew Rockwell's book,

516
00:56:10.080 --> 00:56:20.080
How much better off the citizens of the Roman Empire were after Rome collapsed?

517
00:56:20.080 --> 00:56:27.080
Not Romans, but all the people who were abused by Rome were better off with the collapse of Rome.

518
00:56:27.080 --> 00:56:28.080
Right.

519
00:56:28.080 --> 00:56:32.080
Which kind of leads to what leads better off of Washington.

520
00:56:32.080 --> 00:56:36.080
Right, right, right. Well, on the question of the Constitution being ignored, yeah, I mean,

521
00:56:36.080 --> 00:56:41.120
Yeah, I mean, Tom DiLorenzo actually wrote, I think, one of his best columns ever, on

522
00:56:41.120 --> 00:56:46.840
Lew Rockwell, is called Constitutional Something, but it was a two-word title, where he just

523
00:56:46.840 --> 00:56:53.600
went through and said, you know, on the one hand, you can understand, it's okay, you meet

524
00:56:53.600 --> 00:56:58.360
a lot of decent people who love the country and they love the Constitution, and they just

525
00:56:58.360 --> 00:57:03.880
walk around saying, you know, if only they would obey the Constitution. But, you know,

526
00:57:03.880 --> 00:57:07.680
After years and years and years and years of hearing this, at some point you have to

527
00:57:07.680 --> 00:57:12.360
draw the conclusion that it's just not going to happen. And now it's just getting silly

528
00:57:12.360 --> 00:57:15.840
to sit around saying, gosh, all we need is for them to obey the constitution. They have

529
00:57:15.840 --> 00:57:22.920
no particular incentive to do so. And Tom DiLorenzo also posted a blog thing on Lew

530
00:57:22.920 --> 00:57:33.360
Rockwell saying that a recent meeting of congressmen, one of the points that was made was that arguing

531
00:57:33.360 --> 00:57:38.000
Being a point on constitutional grounds is just totally out, totally passe, like it's

532
00:57:38.000 --> 00:57:40.800
silly, it's laughed at, it's just considered ridiculous.

533
00:57:40.800 --> 00:57:46.120
So you can't, I mean on the one hand I make constitutional arguments because I just want

534
00:57:46.120 --> 00:57:47.120
to embarrass these people.

535
00:57:47.120 --> 00:57:50.400
I mean these are the rules you yourselves have said you're going to live by and you

536
00:57:50.400 --> 00:57:54.280
can't even live by them, well then I want to shove that in your face all the time.

537
00:57:54.280 --> 00:57:58.560
Not because I have some fantasy that will shame them into doing it, but that it will

538
00:57:58.560 --> 00:58:03.920
will throw them into, it'll make people more suspicious of them, which they should be.

539
00:58:03.920 --> 00:58:09.320
Now on the question of the Roman Empire thing, I would just say that when the Romans finally

540
00:58:09.320 --> 00:58:15.720
do extend full citizenship to everybody in the Empire, well this is meant to coincide

541
00:58:15.720 --> 00:58:20.320
with being able to tax all these people, so it is very much a mixed blessing, I would

542
00:58:20.320 --> 00:58:21.320
say.

543
00:58:21.320 --> 00:58:22.320
Yes?

544
00:58:22.320 --> 00:58:33.320
You said this week, demonstrating how our government functions today, that it's in no way like the government that emerged post-1776.

545
00:58:33.320 --> 00:58:40.320
I was wondering if maybe you thought it would be more effective to try to get the people back.

546
00:58:40.320 --> 00:58:45.320
Well, just one phrase that you've used this week oftentimes is you say, it was a different world.

547
00:58:45.320 --> 00:58:49.320
And usually you use that regarding social relations.

548
00:58:49.320 --> 00:58:57.320
In a sense, this was another country. We don't even live in the United States like you were talking about.

549
00:58:57.320 --> 00:59:03.320
Do you think it would be more effective to try to convince people that they're really not in heritage?

550
00:59:03.320 --> 00:59:09.320
That they're not violating the constitution because they live in an entire other country with another tradition

551
00:59:09.320 --> 00:59:15.320
where you have this pale constitution that you just violate and rewrite?

552
00:59:15.320 --> 00:59:24.320
It's a semantic difference, but I think it's a really important, I think it's an important semantic difference.

553
00:59:45.320 --> 00:59:50.800
The regime we have now is, I mean, it's almost in no way related to the, I mean, other than

554
00:59:50.800 --> 00:59:51.800
the most superficial way.

555
00:59:51.800 --> 00:59:56.240
We have an election every four years, but other than that, I mean, only the most superficial

556
00:59:56.240 --> 00:59:57.440
way is it related to this one.

557
00:59:57.440 --> 01:00:00.120
It is a different, it's an entirely different regime.

558
01:00:00.120 --> 01:00:04.720
I think both of ways of phrasing it raise questions of legitimacy in people's minds.

559
01:00:04.720 --> 01:00:09.720
Because how, if this is a different regime from the one that was given to us, but yet

560
01:00:09.720 --> 01:00:14.600
there was absolutely no popular consent to this change of regime, what makes it legitimate?

561
01:00:14.600 --> 01:00:19.240
I understand there's an argument that no governments are legitimate, but my point is that in the minds of most people,

562
01:00:19.240 --> 01:00:23.720
this would seem to be a very disturbing anomaly to them.

563
01:00:23.720 --> 01:00:27.000
Is that more or less? Yeah, yeah, right, good.

564
01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:29.400
Other thoughts? Harry?

565
01:00:29.400 --> 01:00:36.520
Yeah, I was wondering earlier this week about something that you see as a historian,

566
01:00:36.520 --> 01:00:48.520
The Republican Party seems to tend to disfavor intervention in Europe as opposed to other parts of the world.

567
01:00:48.520 --> 01:00:56.520
and the World War I and World War II, cross the road and don't ask questions.

568
01:00:56.520 --> 01:01:04.520
There's a word for this, I don't know if it's a different question or if it has this much

569
01:01:04.520 --> 01:01:06.520
to do with the war, but I'd like to have the debate.

570
01:01:06.520 --> 01:01:12.520
I think there's a union of civilizations in Europe, and if Europe wants to do that,

571
01:01:12.520 --> 01:01:15.520
They don't want to have any of their affairs on that, or...

572
01:01:15.520 --> 01:01:21.520
or to get themselves into that sense of favor and other degrees to the world,

573
01:01:21.520 --> 01:01:24.520
or whatever they may think that they're wrong. I find this wrong.

574
01:01:42.520 --> 01:01:52.520
I'm part of the League to Enforce Peace. I love that organization, the League to Enforce Peace. Freedom is slavery, you know.

575
01:01:52.520 --> 01:01:58.520
So I don't know, I think I'd have to think about that, but I'm inclined to think that the Republicans,

576
01:01:58.520 --> 01:02:04.520
although you can find historical epochs in which they're more hesitant to intervene maybe in Europe,

577
01:02:04.520 --> 01:02:10.520
I tend to think they are nevertheless, at the end of the day, they are equal opportunity interventionists.

578
01:02:10.520 --> 01:02:15.520
Other thoughts that people have? By the way, we're watching a movie tonight at 7.

579
01:02:15.520 --> 01:02:19.520
So you have one free movie remaining. Okay, you should come and take advantage of that.

580
01:02:19.520 --> 01:02:24.520
Not you people in internet land. You have nothing tonight. I don't know what you're doing. Okay?

581
01:02:24.520 --> 01:02:25.520
Yes?

582
01:02:25.520 --> 01:02:30.520
Alright, so this might be too big of a question to answer in this kind of environment,

583
01:02:30.520 --> 01:02:38.520
but you started off the week talking about how the American Revolution was a conservative revolution

584
01:02:38.520 --> 01:03:08.520
Yeah, I know, I know. I mean, it's a good question. You know, the question is, you know, is the relative merits of an unwritten

585
01:03:08.520 --> 01:03:38.520
The thing is, they both have disadvantages, and Don Livingston is absolutely convinced that written constitutions are worse than unwritten ones, and I'm not sure I've totally accepted that argument, but I think this is why I was coming to all these conclusions year after year, and then I read Hans Hoppe's book on democracy, and he said,

586
01:03:38.520 --> 01:04:08.520
and that's exactly the book I needed to read at that moment because it just finally it just kept clocking me over the head with how many times do you have to go over this issue that you know obviously there isn't a piece of paper that's going to solve these problems and you know it's like how why did it take me so long to figure this out I don't know but as I say I think there are pros and cons to both kinds because I mean at least a written Constitution you can at least make a clear statement that

587
01:04:08.520 --> 01:04:19.520
When the Constitution says something in clear language, then you can appeal to normal, sympathetic fellow Americans and say we're not being treated fairly according to the rules that were established.

588
01:04:19.520 --> 01:04:27.520
Whereas if you have an unwritten Constitution, then it's very easy for the government to become legal positivist.

589
01:04:27.520 --> 01:04:33.520
And just to say, well, the Constitution is what we say it is.

590
01:04:33.520 --> 01:04:48.520
Well, of course, that has happened with the written constitution too, but at least when people say, well, you don't have a right to bear arms, and you can just see it right there as part of the Second Amendment, it's a little harder for them to get away with that.

591
01:04:48.520 --> 01:04:56.520
But when there isn't any single codified source to consult, then I think it's much easier for governments to be evasive.

592
01:04:56.520 --> 01:04:57.520
Evasive

593
01:04:57.520 --> 01:04:59.040
So I can think of pros and cons.

594
01:04:59.040 --> 01:05:05.260
One person has mentioned to me this week that the very fact that the U.S. Constitution is

595
01:05:05.260 --> 01:05:10.580
so difficult to amend may have helped to contribute to some of the loose construction because

596
01:05:10.580 --> 01:05:14.640
the thinking then became, well, it's impossible to amend this document, so we may as well

597
01:05:14.640 --> 01:05:17.880
just go ahead and exercise the power in question.

598
01:05:17.880 --> 01:05:25.280
So I guess the only conclusion that I've come to is that this stuff just doesn't work no

599
01:05:25.280 --> 01:05:29.840
No matter what you try to do to limit these people, and in this modern world when the

600
01:05:29.840 --> 01:05:33.920
worst consistently get on top, and it's almost as if the rules are rigged that the worst

601
01:05:33.920 --> 01:05:41.000
people get on top, it seems that, you know, I don't think you can dismiss out of hand

602
01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:47.300
the types of things that Hans Hoppe talks about any longer. I mean, with all the evidence

603
01:05:47.300 --> 01:05:52.880
to the contrary around you, you have to be willing to accept radical alternatives when

604
01:05:52.880 --> 01:05:54.880
and everything else has failed.

605
01:06:22.880 --> 01:06:25.880
as it dangers, as it is in quantity

606
01:06:26.880 --> 01:06:29.880
and has a limited power of documents

607
01:06:52.880 --> 01:07:00.880
I didn't think of it that way as I was writing it, but now that Chris has sort of clarified this in my mind, that's really what it is showing.

608
01:07:00.880 --> 01:07:06.880
It's not just making cutesy little arguments about, hey, isn't this the opposite of what they said?

609
01:07:06.880 --> 01:07:18.880
At root, beneath all the cuteness, it's saying that a really dramatic swindle has just taken place over the past couple of hundred years, if you've been paying any attention.

610
01:07:18.880 --> 01:07:29.880
That to me explains why people who like this regime or who want to be employed by it or who want to root for its wars, of course are going to hate this type of message.

611
01:07:29.880 --> 01:07:35.880
I used to think, well, maybe it's my fault. It really isn't, I've concluded.

612
01:07:35.880 --> 01:07:45.880
People have a vested interest in this order of things and when you throw it into question and when you ridicule it, well, those people are going to come after you.

613
01:07:45.880 --> 01:08:13.880
I would imagine in modern-day academia, particularly in the industry department and philosophy departments, you would be, I think, maverick would be a, yeah, you'd be really understatement.

614
01:08:13.880 --> 01:08:30.880
So obviously you must have a lot of critics after printing this book. How do they come at you with trying to refute when you're actually pointing at facts?

615
01:08:43.880 --> 01:08:48.800
As far as other people, the major complaints have been of a couple of kinds.

616
01:08:48.800 --> 01:08:51.480
Number one is that the book is very selective.

617
01:08:51.480 --> 01:08:55.600
But as I say, I mean, I had to cut two entire chapters out of it.

618
01:08:55.600 --> 01:09:01.480
I had to cut a half a chapter out of the American Revolution, which I thought was the best part.

619
01:09:01.480 --> 01:09:04.960
And so one of the recent criticisms was, boy, it's really thin on the American Revolution.

620
01:09:04.960 --> 01:09:05.960
I know it.

621
01:09:05.960 --> 01:09:06.960
I know.

622
01:09:06.960 --> 01:09:08.140
You're not telling me anything I don't already know.

623
01:09:08.140 --> 01:09:12.160
And so some of it will be, well, he doesn't talk enough about slavery or he doesn't talk

624
01:09:12.160 --> 01:09:13.160
enough about this or that.

625
01:09:13.160 --> 01:09:21.160
I don't talk about the Spanish-American War at all, okay, but I mean, that doesn't mean that I don't think it's important or I'm denying that it occurred.

626
01:09:21.160 --> 01:09:31.160
It's just that, you know, given the limitations of this project, you know, I had to do what I thought, I had to cover the issues that I thought most needed to be clarified.

627
01:09:31.160 --> 01:09:36.160
So that's, but that's a common thing is that I leave things out or I don't talk enough about this, don't talk enough about that.

628
01:09:36.160 --> 01:09:41.160
But you know what? I agree with those people. But that's just the nature of this project.

629
01:09:41.160 --> 01:09:47.160
The idea was to keep the book at a length that a normal, non-dork American would read.

630
01:09:47.160 --> 01:09:50.160
I'm a dork. I'll read the book no matter what the page number is.

631
01:09:50.160 --> 01:09:54.160
But the idea is that this is a book that they can give their neighbors and friends and children, whatever, and they'll read it.

632
01:09:54.160 --> 01:09:58.160
The other type of criticism has been...

633
01:09:58.160 --> 01:10:04.160
By the way, people can stop emailing me that the Iron Curtain speech was delivered in Missouri, not Michigan, that was in the first printing.

634
01:10:04.160 --> 01:10:08.160
I don't know how it got in there. It is not in any subsequent printing. We fixed that.

635
01:10:08.160 --> 01:10:12.760
Thank you very much. I do very much appreciate those e-mails, but I can stop sending them now.

636
01:10:12.760 --> 01:10:20.460
But, you know, there's a recent review on History News Network that makes it sound as...

637
01:10:20.460 --> 01:10:23.160
that actually says that Woods just has contempt for the evidence.

638
01:10:23.160 --> 01:10:25.860
So I looked and said, we'll see, what contempt do I have for the evidence?

639
01:10:25.860 --> 01:10:30.460
So I looked and, you know, half of it is nitpicking, because I said, you know,

640
01:10:30.460 --> 01:10:32.960
Belgium had agreements with such and such countries,

641
01:10:32.960 --> 01:10:35.660
and I should have said Belgium had understandings with these countries.

642
01:10:35.660 --> 01:10:38.780
I mean, oh, yeah, well, that just shows complete contempt for the evidence.

643
01:10:38.780 --> 01:10:44.100
I mean, it's that type of nitpicking thing that this just shows, you know, that you can't

644
01:10:44.100 --> 01:10:46.620
trust anything in the whole book.

645
01:10:46.620 --> 01:10:53.540
Or I do think that I slightly, I do think that I was a little bit inaccurate in describing

646
01:10:53.540 --> 01:10:56.660
Neil Ferguson's thesis in the book, The Pity of War.

647
01:10:56.660 --> 01:11:00.300
But I can change the sentence with three words to make it accurate.

648
01:11:00.300 --> 01:11:06.600
My point is that his thesis was that the British government, by its intervention, helped more

649
01:11:06.600 --> 01:11:10.600
than any other to make it into a global conflict.

650
01:11:10.600 --> 01:11:13.060
Now that's what I'm trying to get at.

651
01:11:13.060 --> 01:11:18.500
In the book I said that he says that Britain is the most responsible for the war.

652
01:11:18.500 --> 01:11:21.660
Well that can be taken to mean that Britain is the most responsible for the outbreak of

653
01:11:21.660 --> 01:11:24.940
the war, whereas what I was trying to get at was that Britain was most responsible for

654
01:11:24.940 --> 01:11:27.180
turning it into an international conflict.

655
01:11:27.180 --> 01:11:32.380
Well, again, you know, come on now, all right, it's a careless sentence, it can be fixed,

656
01:11:32.380 --> 01:11:36.740
it hardly throws the whole book into question, but, you know, you have an accumulation of

657
01:11:36.740 --> 01:11:41.420
little things like this, and then, well, he just has complete contempt for the truth.

658
01:11:41.420 --> 01:11:45.060
I mean, you know, some of these things are defensible, and some of them are just, you

659
01:11:45.060 --> 01:11:49.940
know, and really we're talking about a handful of things, just a handful of little things

660
01:11:49.940 --> 01:11:53.380
that happen in every single book, and then you just tweak them in subsequent printing.

661
01:11:53.380 --> 01:11:55.280
That's just the way it goes.

662
01:11:55.280 --> 01:12:00.120
But this is a way, instead of answering, am I fundamentally correct or not correct on

663
01:12:00.120 --> 01:12:04.000
the following things, of what the true meaning of the First Amendment was, the true meaning

664
01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:09.440
of the Second Amendment, the Ninth and Tenth Amendments? Am I right or am I wrong? Am I

665
01:12:09.440 --> 01:12:14.800
correct or am I incorrect about the principles of 1798? You know, is that something that's

666
01:12:14.800 --> 01:12:18.200
been neglected or is it something that's not been neglected? Am I fundamentally correct

667
01:12:18.200 --> 01:12:23.360
in what I say about antitrust law or the Fourteenth Amendment not being legitimately ratified

668
01:12:23.360 --> 01:12:28.680
or World War I being a boondoggle or the 20s being prosperous or the New Deal being a boondoggle

669
01:12:28.680 --> 01:12:35.280
or World War II not getting us out of the depression or the Marshall Plan not being responsible for European recovery, blah, blah, blah.

670
01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:37.800
I mean, are these things right or wrong?

671
01:12:37.800 --> 01:12:40.400
On those grounds, they don't want to address me.

672
01:12:40.400 --> 01:12:44.560
But on little things on the periphery, you know, that's that's the most I ever get.

673
01:12:44.560 --> 01:12:48.680
Usually, though, I don't get either type of argument.

674
01:12:48.680 --> 01:12:54.680
I don't get the, he left all this out, or, look, I found, you know, three i's not dotted.

675
01:12:54.680 --> 01:13:01.180
The usual thing I get is not to address the contents of the book at all, but simply to say,

676
01:13:01.180 --> 01:13:05.180
oh, isn't it terrible that history is being politicized and, you know,

677
01:13:05.180 --> 01:13:09.180
this being written by people who do that for a living, you know, who are saying,

678
01:13:09.180 --> 01:13:13.180
oh, it's just so political these days, you know, and, oh my goodness, look at this.

679
01:13:13.180 --> 01:13:17.680
Here he is saying, can you believe he's saying the New Deal didn't get us out of the Depression?

680
01:13:17.680 --> 01:13:21.120
Can you believe he thinks the 14th Amendment wasn't ratified?

681
01:13:21.120 --> 01:13:23.440
This is the style of the New York Times reply.

682
01:13:23.440 --> 01:13:28.280
Or can you believe he doesn't think the Marshall Plan was responsible for European recovery?

683
01:13:28.280 --> 01:13:32.760
Because after all, we had the Marshall Plan and then we had European recovery.

684
01:13:32.760 --> 01:13:39.080
You know, so I mean, I guess there's an obvious correlation because one happened after the other one in temporal sequence.

685
01:13:39.080 --> 01:13:42.160
That was the whole nature of the New York Times attack.

686
01:13:42.160 --> 01:13:44.320
It was just to say, oh, can you believe it?

687
01:13:44.320 --> 01:13:47.040
Well, yes, I can, because I can defend all those statements.

688
01:13:47.040 --> 01:13:50.460
I can actually defend all those statements. It's just that we've gotten to a point where

689
01:13:50.460 --> 01:13:56.460
the truth is so far from what the mainstream is teaching that it seems bizarre, subversive

690
01:13:56.460 --> 01:14:01.740
and just plain weird to say it anymore. So, anyway, I thank you for that. It's almost

691
01:14:01.740 --> 01:14:05.400
like I planted that question. Boy, have I been needing to get that off my chest for

692
01:14:05.400 --> 01:14:12.620
a long time. Oh, man, I'm even calmer now as a result of that. Okay, anything else on

693
01:14:12.620 --> 01:14:13.620
people's minds? Yes?

694
01:14:13.620 --> 01:14:25.620
If the tendency of government is intellectually towards expansionism and attempts to constrain government by appealing to these institutional and constitutional barriers that guard against this type of governmental hegemonism,

695
01:14:25.620 --> 01:14:33.620
then it seems to me that it does matter a great deal whether we have the right guy in office or not, which is kind of jeered at by a lot of people.

696
01:14:33.620 --> 01:14:43.620
Especially it seems like libertarian thinkers, which I myself find guilty of making of retorting to my ignorant friends.

697
01:14:43.620 --> 01:14:48.620
Oh, it doesn't matter who we have in office, rather the powers that have been usurped by those in office.

698
01:14:48.620 --> 01:14:49.620
Well, it seems like...

699
01:14:49.620 --> 01:14:51.620
Well, yeah, I wouldn't say that it doesn't matter.

700
01:14:51.620 --> 01:14:54.620
Because, I mean, if Ron Paul were president, things would be much better.

701
01:14:54.620 --> 01:14:56.620
So, I mean, it's not that it doesn't matter.

702
01:14:56.620 --> 01:15:02.620
Usually when I say the term doesn't matter, I just mean I look at the two people I'm being offered and I say, well, this doesn't matter.

703
01:15:02.620 --> 01:15:09.620
John Kerry also favors war in Iraq, but he would rather have waited an extra 11.5 minutes to do it or something.

704
01:15:09.620 --> 01:15:13.620
That's what I have to choose from. So then I would say it doesn't matter.

705
01:15:13.620 --> 01:15:17.620
But obviously the right guy in there could fix it.

706
01:15:17.620 --> 01:15:24.620
But the problem is, as of right now, when you have a dumbed-down population,

707
01:15:24.620 --> 01:15:31.620
and you have interest groups all over the place, I don't see how the right guy gets in.

708
01:15:31.620 --> 01:16:00.620
Could you talk a little bit about the dumbed-down population, and how you would explain that?

709
01:16:00.620 --> 01:16:06.620
No, no, no, I understand that. I mean, present company accepted, you all understand, right, when I say dumbed-down population.

710
01:16:06.620 --> 01:16:11.620
Well, I mean, this is something that even, you know, I don't think this is even just a libertarian or a conservative point.

711
01:16:11.620 --> 01:16:17.620
I mean, you know, even if you talk to, you know, left-wing academics, I mean, you know, in a candid moment,

712
01:16:17.620 --> 01:16:22.620
and they'll say, you know, it's unbelievable how little my students know and they can't write a coherent sentence,

713
01:16:22.620 --> 01:16:27.620
let alone a paper with a thesis and then arguments in defense of it.

714
01:16:27.620 --> 01:16:38.620
But I don't mean just dumbed down in the sense that the population doesn't know, you know, when the Mexican war was or when the Civil War or the war between the states was.

715
01:16:38.620 --> 01:16:47.620
But more than that, it's not just that they don't have a factual foundation, but they often believe things that are just propaganda, they're just the opposite of the truth.

716
01:16:47.620 --> 01:16:55.620
They believe a comic book version of the history of their country, whether it's with Lincoln or with FDR or with big business.

717
01:16:55.620 --> 01:17:10.620
You can pretty much rely on the fact that three quarters of the population, at least, have got a view of history that is, to the extent they know anything about these people and events at all, is about as much the opposite of the truth as you can imagine.

718
01:17:10.620 --> 01:17:24.620
And so, given that, given the way government has been portrayed as this benevolent protector and the private sector has weakened, then it's, when I say that with a dumbed down population, I mean people who believe this propaganda,

719
01:17:24.620 --> 01:17:29.620
And there are professors, there are professors who have been stalking me, like law professors,

720
01:17:29.620 --> 01:17:36.620
who are basically ignoramuses, who have done no reading on anything outside their tiny little tradition.

721
01:17:36.620 --> 01:17:43.620
Then it's very, very difficult to make a radical transformation of the country, to go back to what was intended.

722
01:17:43.620 --> 01:17:49.620
Because you have to have, as Rothbard would always say, the state of public opinion is important.

723
01:17:49.620 --> 01:17:55.620
And if public opinion thinks that your solution would lead to oppression and death and wickedness,

724
01:17:55.620 --> 01:17:57.620
then it's very hard to implement that solution.

725
01:17:57.620 --> 01:18:02.620
Now, one comforting thing, though, is that in addition to being dumbed down,

726
01:18:02.620 --> 01:18:05.620
I think the population is very largely apathetic.

727
01:18:05.620 --> 01:18:14.620
And they'll just, more or less, most of them will just go along with what the winds, the various currents are saying.

728
01:18:14.620 --> 01:18:25.620
So, I mean, the more we can become a critical mass of the opinion-moulding people, you know, the better off we'll be, but, you know, that's all I can say on it.

729
01:18:25.620 --> 01:18:26.620
Yeah, John?

730
01:18:26.620 --> 01:18:30.620
I just have a comment further on this.

731
01:18:30.620 --> 01:18:41.620
I almost sometimes think that with the way people get taught history in high school that they almost shouldn't even bother to teach it, because it's worse for them to think that they know things.

732
01:18:41.620 --> 01:18:42.620
I know it.

733
01:18:42.620 --> 01:18:43.620
And then be completely wrong about it.

734
01:18:43.620 --> 01:18:53.620
And this is, I talked to this with professors at my college who, you know, these are mainstream guys, even though they're like, they're teaching people things that are not true.

735
01:18:53.620 --> 01:18:55.620
That's just not true, that's right.

736
01:18:55.620 --> 01:19:03.620
And they're astounded by it that they don't have been, you know, they tell them the truth in class, but they're like, that's not, no.

737
01:19:03.620 --> 01:19:04.620
Right, right, right.

738
01:19:04.620 --> 01:19:05.620
We'll do that.

739
01:19:05.620 --> 01:19:12.620
Well, for the Internet folks, the heroic John Payne is reminding us of the point that, given the way history is being taught today,

740
01:19:12.620 --> 01:19:15.620
Thomas Jefferson said it would be better not to teach them anything than to teach them what they're teaching.

741
01:19:15.620 --> 01:19:19.620
That reminds me of a statement that Thomas Jefferson once made,

742
01:19:19.620 --> 01:19:22.620
speaking about the newspapers, the print of his day,

743
01:19:22.620 --> 01:19:26.620
saying that it would be better to read no newspaper at all

744
01:19:26.620 --> 01:19:29.620
than to read the newspapers that are coming out in our day.

745
01:19:29.620 --> 01:19:32.620
It would be better to have nothing in your head than to have this stuff in your head.

746
01:19:32.620 --> 01:19:35.620
That reminds me of that Roger Garrison anecdote.

747
01:19:35.620 --> 01:19:39.620
Some of you know Roger Garrison, economics professor, great, brilliant guy.

748
01:19:39.620 --> 01:19:46.620
I met a guy and his own assessment of what's happened about the collapse in academic standards

749
01:19:46.620 --> 01:19:51.620
is summed up in this anecdote. He says that, you know, years ago, I used to have students coming into my class

750
01:19:51.620 --> 01:19:56.620
and their heads would be filled with all these economic myths and I'd have to go and refute the myths.

751
01:19:56.620 --> 01:20:03.620
He says, now I have to teach them the myths and then refute the myths.

752
01:20:03.620 --> 01:20:05.620
Okay. Yes, Harry?

753
01:20:33.620 --> 01:20:35.620
And you wanted to do that?

754
01:20:35.620 --> 01:20:37.620
I mean-

755
01:20:37.620 --> 01:20:40.620
I mean, how does it work in your mind?

756
01:20:40.620 --> 01:20:44.620
Yeah, I mean, I'm not sure how I feel about the Barbary Pirates.

757
01:20:44.620 --> 01:20:49.620
I mean, I would sort of tend to think that if there's a way of dealing with them, you know,

758
01:20:49.620 --> 01:20:52.620
I mean, I would rather, you know, issue some letters of marque and reprisal

759
01:20:52.620 --> 01:20:56.620
and send some private guys out there and deal with it and give them a reward or something.

760
01:20:56.620 --> 01:21:01.620
But, you know, as I was going over some of these incidents, I was thinking to myself that, you know,

761
01:21:01.620 --> 01:21:06.620
It's partly your point that at the time, I'm sure nobody really, you know, people just thought,

762
01:21:06.620 --> 01:21:11.620
oh, this is a small, small thing, but I don't know, now that you look at what we have now,

763
01:21:11.620 --> 01:21:15.620
everything looks like it's a precedent for it, but on the other hand,

764
01:21:15.620 --> 01:21:19.620
we have to be careful not to draw unnecessarily sweeping conclusions.

765
01:21:19.620 --> 01:21:24.620
We have to be careful not to become just careless wig theorists of history that, you know,

766
01:21:24.620 --> 01:21:33.620
Well, you know, right now we've got this crazy, you know, global democratic type, you know, state that wants to intervene all over the place.

767
01:21:33.620 --> 01:21:41.620
That doesn't necessarily mean that we have to look into history and find that every preceding intervention is necessarily a precursor to this.

768
01:21:41.620 --> 01:21:50.620
Because Jefferson was not of the opinion that, you know, he had, there was no ideological mission going on here.

769
01:21:50.620 --> 01:21:53.060
He wasn't trying to civilize the Barbary Pirates.

770
01:21:53.060 --> 01:21:54.820
He wasn't trying to change their religion.

771
01:21:54.820 --> 01:21:59.620
He wasn't trying to preach 19th century liberalism to them.

772
01:21:59.620 --> 01:22:03.180
He was engaged in a fixed and limited engagement that

773
01:22:03.180 --> 01:22:05.660
may have been wise or may have been unwise.

774
01:22:05.660 --> 01:22:09.060
But it doesn't in any way have to culminate in the present.

775
01:22:09.060 --> 01:22:10.860
It's sort of like, I don't believe

776
01:22:10.860 --> 01:22:14.780
that the Beatles has to culminate in Marilyn Manson.

777
01:22:14.780 --> 01:22:16.140
That's just human choice.

778
01:22:16.140 --> 01:22:19.980
They don't have to lead that way.

779
01:22:19.980 --> 01:22:33.980
Related to the wake history issue, I've had history professors tell me outright that in order to really understand history, you have to be sympathetic to the currents that are influential at the time that you're studying.

780
01:22:33.980 --> 01:22:38.980
And so it kind of pushes you in the direction of everything, every change that happens is good.

781
01:22:38.980 --> 01:22:45.980
And I was wondering what you would say to a history professor that told you something like that, because I get it all the time.

782
01:22:49.980 --> 01:22:54.820
Ludwig, sort of thing, like for example, in other words, during the civil rights movement,

783
01:22:54.820 --> 01:22:58.900
we'd be more inclined to look critically on favorable depictions of slavery in the past

784
01:22:58.900 --> 01:23:00.900
and historical treatments, that sort of thing.

785
01:23:00.900 --> 01:23:05.380
In other words, because at that time, there's a wave of egalitarianism sweeping the country,

786
01:23:05.380 --> 01:23:10.980
so we become more impatient with, you know, those other, you know, these negative aspects

787
01:23:10.980 --> 01:23:11.980
of our history.

788
01:23:11.980 --> 01:23:12.980
Is that what you're getting at?

789
01:23:12.980 --> 01:23:21.980
If you're studying the Civil Rights Movement, that's the movement when we look back that has the momentum at the time.

790
01:23:21.980 --> 01:23:25.980
You want to somehow identify yourself with that movement and understand what happens.

791
01:23:42.980 --> 01:23:45.980
How do you know that was a good policy? Have you studied this type of policy before?

792
01:23:45.980 --> 01:23:48.980
But they just take for granted that this type of program is good, that type of program is bad.

793
01:23:48.980 --> 01:23:57.980
And yet, when I've written articles here and there, where I will just make an off-handed reference to this being fortunate or unfortunate,

794
01:23:57.980 --> 01:24:00.980
I've had references to this being fortunate or unfortunate.

795
01:24:00.980 --> 01:24:11.980
And yet, when I've written articles here and there where I will just make an off-handed reference to this being fortunate or unfortunate,

796
01:24:11.980 --> 01:24:19.980
I've had referees say, you can't be partisan like that in this article, but everybody in the world is partisan on the other side of Roosevelt.

797
01:24:19.980 --> 01:24:25.980
So that just annoys me. It's not really an answer, but that's just my thought.

798
01:24:25.980 --> 01:24:52.980
How does your argument fit in Van Crevelle's The Rise of the Planet of the States, which said that all of Western countries' states are collapsed?

799
01:24:55.980 --> 01:25:24.980
He defended himself here. A young woman from Canada asked him how he'd present the arguments he does when he lives in a country with more and more regulations.

800
01:25:25.980 --> 01:25:41.980
But if that were true, then the U.S. has been in its last gasp for a century because the regulatory state has been...

801
01:25:41.980 --> 01:25:46.980
And I'm saying this just not to be flippant about your question, which is a good one,

802
01:25:46.980 --> 01:25:52.980
but that I want to believe what Van Creveld is saying about the decline of the state,

803
01:25:52.980 --> 01:26:00.980
I think that there could be severe crises in these states in the future

804
01:26:00.980 --> 01:26:04.980
that could very dramatically change the whole landscape.

805
01:26:04.980 --> 01:26:09.980
Obviously, we all know about the welfare state collapsing

806
01:26:09.980 --> 01:26:12.980
and demographic changes that are going to cause big problems,

807
01:26:12.980 --> 01:26:15.980
but I don't see a gradual and steady decline.

808
01:26:15.980 --> 01:26:19.980
It seems to me more likely that we'll just sort of hum along

809
01:26:19.980 --> 01:26:46.980
In response to what John Key was saying in terms of Facebook views, and not just political misperceptions, but historical accurate information,

810
01:26:46.980 --> 01:27:10.980
Frank Appleton, a couple of teachers recently on systematically biased beliefs about economics and rational rationality and what makes people think like economists, where he tries to seriously compare a collection of health beliefs by economists with the same issues as regular people.

811
01:27:10.980 --> 01:27:17.780
regular people facilitate their beliefs, but through express action in politics about economics,

812
01:27:17.780 --> 01:27:26.900
that key attributes is there's no real opportunity cost to expressing wrong beliefs or irrational beliefs in politics,

813
01:27:27.240 --> 01:27:33.880
versus business, but if you think that putting orange juice in your car is going to be the best thing...

814
01:27:33.880 --> 01:27:36.000
There's a checking mechanism to it.

815
01:27:36.000 --> 01:27:38.540
Right, exactly, yeah, there's an immediate cost paid for that.

816
01:27:38.540 --> 01:27:43.540
I think socialized healthcare is the best thing in the world. Nothing can stop people going out and voting for it.

817
01:27:43.540 --> 01:27:50.540
I was just wondering if any kind of empirical comparison is done in terms of what people think about history.

818
01:27:50.540 --> 01:27:53.540
It seems like there's no opportunity cost to that either.

819
01:27:53.540 --> 01:28:01.540
I can think that so-and-so was the Abe Lincoln, the kind-hearted guy who likes puppies or something like that.

820
01:28:01.540 --> 01:28:08.540
Okay, Dan asks, for you Internet folks, Dan asks a very good question about some work that Brian Kaplan apparently has done,

821
01:28:08.540 --> 01:28:15.540
making the argument that in certain spheres of human endeavor, like history or in politics,

822
01:28:15.540 --> 01:28:21.540
well, for example, in politics, there doesn't seem to be a huge opportunity cost associated with being dead wrong about something.

823
01:28:21.540 --> 01:28:27.540
If you have some idiotic belief about public policy, you know, or I want a single payer health care plan or something,

824
01:28:27.540 --> 01:28:44.540
In business, if you have some false belief like you can power your car on orange juice, there would be an immediate checking mechanism that would stop you from holding these views in the future.

825
01:28:44.540 --> 01:28:51.540
And is there such an empirical study of, have we looked at this in terms of history?

826
01:28:51.540 --> 01:28:58.540
That people's historical knowledge doesn't seem to have, there's no apparent opportunity cost associated with thinking silly things about history.

827
01:28:58.540 --> 01:29:03.540
I don't know, but it sounds plausible to me.

828
01:29:03.540 --> 01:29:10.540
In fact, this is associated with the usual student question, which is, why does any of this matter?

829
01:29:10.540 --> 01:29:12.540
They always ask, why does any of this matter?

830
01:29:12.540 --> 01:29:14.540
So there's no real opportunity cost.

831
01:29:14.540 --> 01:29:16.540
Other than getting a bad grade in the short run,

832
01:29:16.540 --> 01:29:19.540
in the long run there doesn't seem to be much opportunity cost.

833
01:29:19.540 --> 01:29:25.540
Unless you think being ignorant in and of itself is something to be avoided,

834
01:29:25.540 --> 01:29:30.540
and apparently this is less and less of a motivation for people, apparently,

835
01:29:30.540 --> 01:29:33.540
then we're stuck with this problem.

836
01:29:33.540 --> 01:29:37.540
By the way, does Kaplan still have that quiz on the crimes of communism?

837
01:29:37.540 --> 01:29:43.540
Has he ever given that to students? Or is it just for people going to the website?

838
01:29:43.540 --> 01:29:46.540
I just wondered about that. I've wondered about giving that to people.

839
01:29:46.540 --> 01:29:52.540
Okay, I think actually we're at the time, but we can talk to each other informally, so thank you all very much again.