WEBVTT

NOTE 14. The Epistemological Features of History

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.160
Chapter 14 The Epistemological Features of History

2
00:00:05.160 --> 00:00:09.360
1.

3
00:00:09.360 --> 00:00:16.080
Prediction in the Natural Sciences The Natural Sciences have two modes of predicting

4
00:00:16.080 --> 00:00:22.400
future events, the sweeping prediction and the statistical prediction.

5
00:00:22.400 --> 00:00:28.960
The former says, B follows A. The latter says, In x percent of all cases,

6
00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:37.900
B follows A. In 100 minus X percent of all cases, non-B follows A. Neither of these predictions

7
00:00:37.900 --> 00:00:45.420
can be called apodictic. Both are based upon experience. Experience is necessarily of past

8
00:00:45.420 --> 00:00:51.620
events. It can be resorted to for the prediction of future events only with the aid of the

9
00:00:51.620 --> 00:00:57.180
assumption that an invariable uniformity prevails in the concatenation and succession of natural

10
00:00:57.180 --> 00:00:58.700
Natural Phenomena.

11
00:00:58.700 --> 00:01:03.580
Referring to this a prioristic assumption, the natural sciences proceed to Ampliative

12
00:01:03.580 --> 00:01:09.700
Induction, inferring from regularity observed in the past to the same regularity in future

13
00:01:09.700 --> 00:01:11.700
events.

14
00:01:11.700 --> 00:01:16.380
Ampliative Induction is the epistemological basis of the natural sciences.

15
00:01:16.380 --> 00:01:21.020
The fact that the various machines and gadgets designed in accordance with the theorems of

16
00:01:21.020 --> 00:01:26.740
the natural sciences run and work in the expected way, provides practical confirmation both

17
00:01:26.740 --> 00:01:30.740
The Theory of Money and Credit

18
00:01:30.740 --> 00:01:34.740
The Theory of Money and Credit

19
00:01:56.740 --> 00:02:01.140
natural sciences, technological and epistemological precariousness of the natural sciences.

20
00:02:01.140 --> 00:02:06.700
They provide the only mental tool that can be used in the ceaseless struggle for life.

21
00:02:06.700 --> 00:02:12.100
They have proved their practical worth, as no other way to knowledge is open to man.

22
00:02:12.100 --> 00:02:14.860
No alternative is left to him.

23
00:02:14.860 --> 00:02:20.780
If he wants to survive and to render his life more agreeable, he must accept the natural

24
00:02:20.780 --> 00:02:25.420
sciences as guides toward technological and therapeutical success.

25
00:02:25.420 --> 00:02:31.500
We must behave as if the predictions of the natural sciences were truth, perhaps not eternal,

26
00:02:31.500 --> 00:02:36.900
unshakable truth, but at least truth for that period of time for which human action can

27
00:02:36.900 --> 00:02:39.240
plan to provide.

28
00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:44.220
The assurance with which the natural sciences announce their findings is not founded solely

29
00:02:44.220 --> 00:02:45.980
upon this as if.

30
00:02:45.980 --> 00:02:51.740
It is also derived from the inner subjectivity and objectivity of the experience that is

31
00:02:51.740 --> 00:02:57.420
is the raw material of the natural sciences and the starting point of their reasoning.

32
00:02:57.420 --> 00:03:02.500
The apprehension of external objects is such that, among all those in a position to become

33
00:03:02.500 --> 00:03:08.140
aware of them, agreement about the nature of that apprehension can easily be reached.

34
00:03:08.140 --> 00:03:14.020
There is no disagreement about pointer readings that cannot be brought to a final decision.

35
00:03:14.020 --> 00:03:16.300
Scientists may disagree about theories.

36
00:03:16.300 --> 00:03:21.540
They neverlastingly disagree about the establishment of what is called pure facts.

37
00:03:21.540 --> 00:03:26.980
There can be no dispute as to whether a definite piece of stuff is copper or iron or its weight

38
00:03:26.980 --> 00:03:29.740
is two pounds or five.

39
00:03:29.740 --> 00:03:35.180
It would be preposterous to fail to recognize the significance of the epistemological discussions

40
00:03:35.180 --> 00:03:41.200
concerning induction, truth, and the mathematical calculus of probability.

41
00:03:41.200 --> 00:03:46.800
Yet these philosophical disquisitions do not further our endeavors to analyze the epistemological

42
00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:50.100
problems of the sciences of human action.

43
00:03:50.100 --> 00:03:55.360
What the epistemology of the sciences of human action has to remember about the natural sciences

44
00:03:55.360 --> 00:04:00.200
is that their theorems, although abstracted from experience, in other words, from what

45
00:04:00.200 --> 00:04:06.660
happened in the past, have been used successfully for designing future action.

46
00:04:06.660 --> 00:04:09.060
2.

47
00:04:09.060 --> 00:04:12.200
HISTORY AND PREDICTION

48
00:04:12.200 --> 00:04:17.100
In their logical aspect, the procedures applied to the most elaborate investigations in the

49
00:04:17.100 --> 00:04:28.020
The logic of science is not different from the logic resorted to by any individual in

50
00:04:28.020 --> 00:04:33.180
the meditations that precede his actions or weigh their effects afterward.

51
00:04:33.180 --> 00:04:39.440
There is only one a priori and only one logic conceivable to the human mind.

52
00:04:39.440 --> 00:04:44.300
There is consequently only one body of natural science that can stand critical examination

53
00:04:44.300 --> 00:04:50.940
by the Logical Analysis of Available Experience As there is only one mode of logical thinking,

54
00:04:50.940 --> 00:04:57.920
there is only one praxeology, and for that matter, only one mathematics, valid for all.

55
00:04:57.920 --> 00:05:04.100
As there is no human thinking that would fail to distinguish between A and non-A, so there

56
00:05:04.100 --> 00:05:09.000
is no human action that would not distinguish between means and ends.

57
00:05:09.000 --> 00:05:17.480
This distinction implies that man values, that is to say that he prefers an A to a B.

58
00:05:17.480 --> 00:05:23.040
For the natural sciences, the limit of knowledge is the establishment of an ultimate given,

59
00:05:23.040 --> 00:05:27.920
that is, of a fact that cannot be traced back to another fact of which it would appear as

60
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:30.480
the necessary consequence.

61
00:05:30.480 --> 00:05:36.120
For the sciences of human action, the ultimate given is the judgments of value of the actors

62
00:05:36.120 --> 00:05:39.860
and the ideas that engender these judgments of value.

63
00:05:39.860 --> 00:05:45.480
It is precisely this fact that precludes employing the methods of the natural sciences to solve

64
00:05:45.480 --> 00:05:48.620
problems of human action.

65
00:05:48.620 --> 00:05:55.780
Observing nature, man discovers an inexorable regularity in the reaction of objects to stimuli.

66
00:05:55.780 --> 00:05:59.940
He classifies things according to the pattern of their reaction.

67
00:05:59.940 --> 00:06:06.100
A concrete thing, for example copper, is something that reacts in the same way in which other

68
00:06:06.100 --> 00:06:09.220
Other Specimens of the Same Class React

69
00:06:09.220 --> 00:06:14.100
As the patterns of this reaction are known, the engineer knows what future reaction on

70
00:06:14.100 --> 00:06:17.300
the part of copper he has to expect.

71
00:06:17.300 --> 00:06:22.340
This foreknowledge, notwithstanding the epistemological reservations referred to in the preceding

72
00:06:22.340 --> 00:06:26.100
section, is considered apodictic.

73
00:06:26.100 --> 00:06:33.060
All our science and philosophy, all our civilization would at once be called into question if,

74
00:06:33.060 --> 00:06:39.780
In but one instance, and for but one moment, the patterns of these reactions varied.

75
00:06:39.780 --> 00:06:45.220
What distinguishes the sciences of human action is the fact that there is no such foreknowledge

76
00:06:45.220 --> 00:06:50.340
of the individual's value judgments, of the ends they will aim at under the impact of

77
00:06:50.340 --> 00:06:56.340
these value judgments, of the means they will resort to in order to attain the ends sought,

78
00:06:56.340 --> 00:07:01.500
and of the effects of their actions insofar as these are not entirely determined by factors

79
00:07:01.500 --> 00:07:05.860
the knowledge of which is conveyed by the natural sciences.

80
00:07:05.860 --> 00:07:11.460
We know something about these things, but our knowledge of them and about them is categorically

81
00:07:11.460 --> 00:07:17.980
different from the kind of knowledge the experimental natural sciences provide about natural events.

82
00:07:17.980 --> 00:07:22.500
We could call it historical knowledge if this term were not liable to misinterpretation

83
00:07:22.500 --> 00:07:28.660
in suggesting that this knowledge serves only or predominantly to elucidate past events.

84
00:07:28.660 --> 00:07:33.400
But its most important use is to be seen in the service it renders to the anticipation

85
00:07:33.400 --> 00:07:38.660
of future conditions and to the designing of action that necessarily always aims at

86
00:07:38.660 --> 00:07:41.640
affecting future conditions.

87
00:07:41.640 --> 00:07:45.600
Something happens in the field of the nation's domestic politics.

88
00:07:45.600 --> 00:07:51.300
How will Senator X, the outstanding man of the Green Party, react?

89
00:07:51.300 --> 00:07:55.860
Many informed men may have an opinion about the senator's expected reaction.

90
00:07:55.860 --> 00:08:01.180
Perhaps one of these opinions will prove to be correct, but it may also happen that none

91
00:08:01.180 --> 00:08:07.060
of them was right and that the senator reacts in a way not prognosticated by anybody.

92
00:08:07.060 --> 00:08:11.540
And then a similar dilemma arises in weighing the effects brought about by the way the senator

93
00:08:11.540 --> 00:08:13.320
has reacted.

94
00:08:13.320 --> 00:08:18.220
This second dilemma cannot be resolved as the first one was, as soon as the senator's

95
00:08:18.220 --> 00:08:20.980
action becomes known.

96
00:08:20.980 --> 00:08:27.300
For centuries to come, historians may disagree about the effects produced by certain actions.

97
00:08:27.300 --> 00:08:32.940
Traditional epistemology, exclusively preoccupied with the logical problems of the natural sciences

98
00:08:32.940 --> 00:08:37.980
and wholly ignorant even of the existence of the field of praxeology, tried to deal

99
00:08:37.980 --> 00:08:43.620
with these problems from the point of view of its narrow-minded dogmatic orthodoxy.

100
00:08:43.620 --> 00:08:49.340
It condemned all the sciences that were not experimental natural sciences as backward

101
00:08:49.340 --> 00:08:54.860
and Committed to an Outdated Philosophical and Metaphysical, that is, in their usage,

102
00:08:54.860 --> 00:08:56.900
stupid, method.

103
00:08:56.900 --> 00:09:01.980
It confused probability, as the term is used in colloquial expressions referring to history

104
00:09:01.980 --> 00:09:07.260
and practical everyday action, with the concept of probability as employed in the mathematical

105
00:09:07.260 --> 00:09:09.380
calculus of probability.

106
00:09:09.380 --> 00:09:12.660
Finally, sociology made its appearance.

107
00:09:12.660 --> 00:09:18.080
It promised to substitute true science for the rubbish and empty gossiping of the historians

108
00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:25.480
in developing an a posteriori science of social laws to be derived from historical experience.

109
00:09:25.480 --> 00:09:31.960
This disparagement of the methods of history moved first Dilte, then Vildebandt, Rickert,

110
00:09:31.960 --> 00:09:38.560
Max Weber, Croce, and Collingwood to opposition. Their interpretations were in many regards

111
00:09:38.560 --> 00:09:44.680
unsatisfactory. They were diluted by many of the fundamental errors of historicism.

112
00:09:44.680 --> 00:09:51.360
All but Collingwood failed entirely to recognize the unique epistemological character of economics.

113
00:09:51.360 --> 00:09:54.320
They were vague in their references to psychology.

114
00:09:54.320 --> 00:09:58.740
The first four, moreover, were not free from the chauvinistic bias, which in the age of

115
00:09:58.740 --> 00:10:03.620
pan-Germanism induced even the most eminent German thinkers to belittle the teachings

116
00:10:03.620 --> 00:10:06.900
of what they called Western philosophy.

117
00:10:06.900 --> 00:10:12.440
But the fact remains that they succeeded brilliantly in elucidating the epistemological features

118
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:14.360
of the study of history.

119
00:10:14.360 --> 00:10:19.640
They destroyed forever the prestige of those epistemological doctrines that blamed history

120
00:10:19.640 --> 00:10:23.680
for being history and for not being social physics.

121
00:10:23.680 --> 00:10:29.480
They exposed the futility of the search after a posteriori laws of historical change or

122
00:10:29.480 --> 00:10:34.960
historical becoming that would make possible the prediction of future history in the way

123
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:39.480
the physicists predict the future behavior of copper.

124
00:10:39.480 --> 00:10:41.880
They Made History Self-Conscious

125
00:10:41.880 --> 00:10:46.160
3.

126
00:10:46.160 --> 00:10:51.680
The Specific Understanding of History

127
00:10:51.680 --> 00:10:57.800
Praxeology, the a priori science of human action, and more specifically, its up-to-now

128
00:10:57.800 --> 00:11:03.800
best-developed part, economics, provides in its field a consummate interpretation of past

129
00:11:03.800 --> 00:11:08.920
events recorded and a consummate anticipation of the effects to be expected from future

130
00:11:08.920 --> 00:11:15.440
Future Actions of a Definite Kind. Neither this interpretation nor this anticipation

131
00:11:15.440 --> 00:11:20.760
tells anything about the actual content and quality of the acting individual's judgments

132
00:11:20.760 --> 00:11:28.840
of value. Both presuppose that the individuals are valuing and acting, but their theorems

133
00:11:28.840 --> 00:11:36.480
are independent of and unaffected by the particular characteristics of this valuing and acting.

134
00:11:36.480 --> 00:11:41.520
These characteristics are for the sciences of human action ultimate data.

135
00:11:41.520 --> 00:11:45.080
They are what is called historical individuality.

136
00:11:45.080 --> 00:11:51.080
However, there is a momentous difference between the ultimate given in the natural sciences

137
00:11:51.080 --> 00:11:54.240
and that in the field of human action.

138
00:11:54.240 --> 00:11:59.280
An ultimate given of nature is, for the time being, that is, until someone succeeds in

139
00:11:59.280 --> 00:12:04.500
exposing it as the necessary consequence of some other ultimate given, a stopping point

140
00:12:04.500 --> 00:12:11.780
for Human Reflection. It is as it is. That is all that man can say about it.

141
00:12:11.780 --> 00:12:16.560
But it is different with the ultimate given of human action, with the value judgments

142
00:12:16.560 --> 00:12:22.040
of individuals and the actions induced by them. They are ultimately given as they cannot

143
00:12:22.040 --> 00:12:27.300
be traced back to something of which they would appear to be the necessary consequence.

144
00:12:27.300 --> 00:12:32.840
If this were not the case, it would not be permissible to call them an ultimate given.

145
00:12:32.840 --> 00:12:37.540
But they are not, like the ultimate given in the natural sciences, a stopping point for

146
00:12:37.540 --> 00:12:39.380
human reflection.

147
00:12:39.380 --> 00:12:44.820
They are the starting point of a specific mode of reflection, of the specific understanding

148
00:12:44.820 --> 00:12:48.820
of the historical sciences of human action.

149
00:12:48.820 --> 00:12:53.140
If the experimenter in the laboratory has established a fact which, at least for the

150
00:12:53.140 --> 00:12:59.220
time being, cannot be traced back to another fact of which it would appear as a derivative,

151
00:12:59.220 --> 00:13:02.440
there is nothing more to be said about the issue.

152
00:13:02.440 --> 00:13:08.020
But if we are faced with a value judgment and the resulting action, we may try to understand

153
00:13:08.020 --> 00:13:11.520
how they originated in the mind of the actor.

154
00:13:11.520 --> 00:13:16.220
This specific understanding of human action as it is practiced by everybody in all his

155
00:13:16.220 --> 00:13:21.820
inner human relations and actions is a mental procedure that must not be confused with any

156
00:13:21.820 --> 00:13:27.140
of the logical schemes resorted to by the natural sciences and by everybody in purely

157
00:13:27.140 --> 00:13:30.660
technological or therapeutical activities.

158
00:13:30.660 --> 00:13:35.880
The specific understanding aims at the cognition of other people's actions.

159
00:13:35.880 --> 00:13:39.420
It asks, in retrospect, what was he doing?

160
00:13:39.420 --> 00:13:41.160
What was he aiming at?

161
00:13:41.160 --> 00:13:44.600
What did he mean in choosing this definite end?

162
00:13:44.600 --> 00:13:46.960
What was the outcome of his action?

163
00:13:46.960 --> 00:13:50.320
Or it asks analogous questions for the future.

164
00:13:50.320 --> 00:13:52.360
What ends will he choose?

165
00:13:52.360 --> 00:13:54.860
What will he do in order to attain them?

166
00:13:54.860 --> 00:13:58.200
What will the outcome of his action be?

167
00:13:58.200 --> 00:14:02.960
In actual life, all these questions are seldom asked in isolation.

168
00:14:02.960 --> 00:14:07.640
They are mostly connected with other questions referring to praxeology or to the natural

169
00:14:07.640 --> 00:14:08.960
sciences.

170
00:14:08.960 --> 00:14:15.040
The categorical distinctions that epistemology is bound to make are tools of our mental operations.

171
00:14:15.040 --> 00:14:20.120
The real events are complex phenomena and can be grasped by the mind only if each of

172
00:14:20.120 --> 00:14:24.760
the various tools available is employed for its proper purpose.

173
00:14:24.760 --> 00:14:30.920
The main epistemological problem of the scientific understanding is, how can a man have any knowledge

174
00:14:30.920 --> 00:14:35.280
of the future value judgments and actions of other people?

175
00:14:35.280 --> 00:14:39.560
The traditional method of dealing with this problem, commonly called the problem of the

176
00:14:39.560 --> 00:14:44.320
alter ego or fremdverstehen, is unsatisfactory.

177
00:14:44.320 --> 00:14:49.280
It focused attention upon grasping the meaning of other people's behavior in the present

178
00:14:49.280 --> 00:14:52.440
or, more correctly, in the past.

179
00:14:52.440 --> 00:14:58.040
But the task with which acting man, that is, everybody, is faced, in all relations with

180
00:14:58.040 --> 00:15:03.800
his fellows, does not refer to the past, it refers to the future.

181
00:15:03.800 --> 00:15:09.960
To know the future reactions of other people is the first task of acting man.

182
00:15:09.960 --> 00:15:14.920
Knowledge of their past value judgments and actions, although indispensable, is only a

183
00:15:14.920 --> 00:15:17.400
means to this end.

184
00:15:17.400 --> 00:15:22.160
It is obvious that this knowledge which provides a man with the ability to anticipate to some

185
00:15:22.160 --> 00:15:27.360
In some degree, other people's future attitudes is not a priori knowledge.

186
00:15:27.360 --> 00:15:33.760
The a priori discipline of human action, praxeology, does not deal with the actual content of value

187
00:15:33.760 --> 00:15:35.020
judgments.

188
00:15:35.020 --> 00:15:40.920
It deals only with the fact that men value and then act according to their valuations.

189
00:15:40.920 --> 00:15:47.320
What we know about the actual content of judgments of value can be derived only from experience.

190
00:15:47.320 --> 00:15:52.120
We have experience of other people's past value judgments and actions, and we have experience

191
00:15:52.120 --> 00:15:55.280
of Our Own Value Judgments and Actions.

192
00:15:55.280 --> 00:15:58.520
The latter is commonly called introspection.

193
00:15:58.520 --> 00:16:03.800
To distinguish it from experimental psychology, the term thymology was suggested in an earlier

194
00:16:03.800 --> 00:16:10.440
chapter for that branch of knowledge which deals with human judgments of values and ideas.

195
00:16:10.440 --> 00:16:16.720
Wilhelm Dilthe stressed the role that thymology, of course he said psychology, plays in the

196
00:16:16.720 --> 00:16:21.940
The Geistesweisenschaften, the mental or moral sciences, the sciences dealing with human

197
00:16:21.940 --> 00:16:28.280
thoughts, ideas and value judgments, and their operation in the external world.

198
00:16:28.280 --> 00:16:33.920
It is not our task to trace back Dilte's ideas to earlier authors.

199
00:16:33.920 --> 00:16:38.640
There is little doubt that he owed much to predecessors, especially to David Hume.

200
00:16:38.640 --> 00:16:43.000
But the examination of these influences must be left to treatises dealing with the history

201
00:16:43.000 --> 00:16:44.480
of philosophy.

202
00:16:44.480 --> 00:17:00.480
Dilte's chief contribution was his pointing out in what respect the kind of psychology he was referring to was epistemologically and methodologically different from the natural sciences and therefore also from experimental psychology.

203
00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:05.480
4. Thymological Experience

204
00:17:05.480 --> 00:17:11.520
Thymological experience is what we know about human value judgments, the actions determined

205
00:17:11.520 --> 00:17:16.480
by them, and the responses these actions arouse in other people.

206
00:17:16.480 --> 00:17:21.560
As has been said, this experience stems either from introspection or from intercourse with

207
00:17:21.560 --> 00:17:26.760
other men, from our acting in various interhuman relations.

208
00:17:26.760 --> 00:17:32.300
Like all experience, thymological experience, too, is necessarily knowledge of things that

209
00:17:32.300 --> 00:17:34.440
happened in the past.

210
00:17:34.440 --> 00:17:39.040
For reasons made sufficiently clear in the earlier sections of this essay, it is not

211
00:17:39.040 --> 00:17:43.300
permitted to assign to it the meaning the natural science is assigned to the results

212
00:17:43.300 --> 00:17:45.660
of experimentation.

213
00:17:45.660 --> 00:17:50.800
What we learn from theismological experience never has the significance of what is called

214
00:17:50.800 --> 00:17:55.240
in the natural sciences an experimentally established fact.

215
00:17:55.240 --> 00:17:59.000
It always remains a historical fact.

216
00:17:59.000 --> 00:18:02.080
Theismology is a historical discipline.

217
00:18:02.080 --> 00:18:07.500
For lack of any better tool, we must take recourse to thymology if we want to anticipate

218
00:18:07.500 --> 00:18:10.840
other people's future attitudes and actions.

219
00:18:10.840 --> 00:18:15.600
Out of our general thymological experience, acquired either directly from observing our

220
00:18:15.600 --> 00:18:21.520
fellow men and transacting business with them or indirectly from reading and from hearsay,

221
00:18:21.520 --> 00:18:26.260
as well as out of our special experience acquired in previous contacts with the individuals

222
00:18:26.260 --> 00:18:31.960
or groups concerned, we try to form an opinion about their future conduct.

223
00:18:31.960 --> 00:18:37.520
It is easy to see in what the fundamental difference consists between this kind of anticipation

224
00:18:37.520 --> 00:18:42.460
and that of an engineer designing the plan for the construction of a bridge.

225
00:18:42.460 --> 00:18:48.200
Phymology tells no more than that man is driven by various innate instincts, various passions

226
00:18:48.200 --> 00:18:50.420
and various ideas.

227
00:18:50.420 --> 00:18:55.600
The anticipating individual tries to set aside those factors that manifestly do not play

228
00:18:55.600 --> 00:18:59.500
any role in the concrete case under consideration.

229
00:18:59.500 --> 00:19:08.020
It is unusual to qualify such prognoses as more or less probable and to contrast them

230
00:19:08.020 --> 00:19:12.860
with the forecasts of the natural sciences which once were called certain and are still

231
00:19:12.860 --> 00:19:19.380
considered certain and exact by people not familiar with the problems of logic and epistemology.

232
00:19:19.380 --> 00:19:24.220
Setting aside these latter problems, we must emphasize that the probability of the prognoses

233
00:19:24.220 --> 00:19:29.220
concerning future human action has little in common with that category of probability

234
00:19:29.220 --> 00:19:33.060
which is dealt with in the mathematical calculus of probability.

235
00:19:33.060 --> 00:19:38.540
The former is case probability and not class probability.

236
00:19:38.540 --> 00:19:45.620
In order to prevent confusion, it is advisable to refer to case probability as likelihood.

237
00:19:45.620 --> 00:19:50.820
In the specific understanding of future events, there are, as a rule, two orders of likelihood

238
00:19:50.820 --> 00:19:52.700
to be ascertained.

239
00:19:52.700 --> 00:19:58.220
The first refers to the enumeration of factors that could possibly take or have taken effect

240
00:19:58.220 --> 00:20:03.100
in Producing the Outcome in Question. The second refers to the influence of each of

241
00:20:03.100 --> 00:20:08.600
these factors in the production of the outcome. It can easily be seen that the likelihood

242
00:20:08.600 --> 00:20:13.500
that the enumeration of the operating factors will be correct and complete is much higher

243
00:20:13.500 --> 00:20:18.860
than the likelihood that the proper extent of participation will be attributed to each.

244
00:20:18.860 --> 00:20:24.220
Yet the correctness or incorrectness of a prognosis depends on the correctness or incorrectness

245
00:20:24.220 --> 00:20:29.860
of this latter evaluation. The precariousness of forecasting is mainly due to the intricacy

246
00:20:29.860 --> 00:20:36.220
of this second problem. It is not only a rather puzzling question in forecasting future events.

247
00:20:36.220 --> 00:20:42.740
It is no less puzzling in retrospect for the historian. It is not enough for the statesman,

248
00:20:42.740 --> 00:20:47.900
the politician, the general, or the entrepreneur to know all the factors that can possibly

249
00:20:47.900 --> 00:20:54.020
contribute to the determination of a future event. In order to anticipate correctly, they

250
00:20:54.020 --> 00:20:59.700
They must also anticipate correctly the quantity, as it were, of each factor's contribution

251
00:20:59.700 --> 00:21:05.220
and the instant at which its contribution will become effective, and later the historians

252
00:21:05.220 --> 00:21:12.420
will have to face the same difficulty in analyzing and understanding the case in retrospect.

253
00:21:12.420 --> 00:21:14.940
5.

254
00:21:14.940 --> 00:21:19.280
Real Types and Ideal Types

255
00:21:19.280 --> 00:21:24.300
The natural sciences classify the things of the external world according to their reaction

256
00:21:24.300 --> 00:21:26.200
to stimuli.

257
00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:31.400
Since copper is something that reacts in a definite way, the name copper is denied to

258
00:21:31.400 --> 00:21:34.560
a thing that reacts in a different way.

259
00:21:34.560 --> 00:21:41.080
In establishing the fact that a thing is copper, we make a forecast about its future behavior.

260
00:21:41.080 --> 00:21:45.480
What is copper cannot be iron or oxygen.

261
00:21:45.480 --> 00:21:50.360
In acting, in their daily routine as well as in technology and therapeutics and also

262
00:21:50.360 --> 00:21:57.280
in history, people employ real types, that is, class concepts distinguishing people or

263
00:21:57.280 --> 00:22:01.440
institutions according to neatly definable traits.

264
00:22:01.440 --> 00:22:07.560
Such classification can be based on concepts of praxeology and economics, of jurisprudence,

265
00:22:07.560 --> 00:22:11.240
of technology, and of the natural sciences.

266
00:22:11.240 --> 00:22:16.600
It may refer to Italians, for example, either as the inhabitants of a definite area, or

267
00:22:16.600 --> 00:22:23.160
as people endowed with a special legal characteristic, namely Italian nationality, or as a definite

268
00:22:23.160 --> 00:22:25.340
linguistic group.

269
00:22:25.340 --> 00:22:30.200
This kind of classification is independent of specific understanding.

270
00:22:30.200 --> 00:22:34.840
It points towards something that is common to all members of the class.

271
00:22:34.840 --> 00:22:40.160
All Italians, in the geographic sense of the term, are affected by geological or meteorological

272
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:48.280
All Italian citizens are concerned by legal acts relating to people of their nationality.

273
00:22:48.280 --> 00:22:52.640
All Italians, in the linguistic sense of the term, are in a position to make themselves

274
00:22:52.640 --> 00:22:55.080
understood to one another.

275
00:22:55.080 --> 00:22:59.400
Nothing more than this is meant when a man is called an Italian in one of these three

276
00:22:59.400 --> 00:23:01.240
connotations.

277
00:23:01.240 --> 00:23:06.440
The characteristic mark of an ideal type, on the other hand, is that it implies some

278
00:23:06.440 --> 00:23:10.040
proposition concerning valuing and acting.

279
00:23:10.040 --> 00:23:15.820
If an ideal type refers to people, it implies that in some respect these men are valuing

280
00:23:15.820 --> 00:23:19.720
and acting in a uniform or similar way.

281
00:23:19.720 --> 00:23:24.960
When it refers to institutions, it implies that these institutions are products of uniform

282
00:23:24.960 --> 00:23:29.920
or similar ways of valuing and acting, or that they influence valuing and acting in

283
00:23:29.920 --> 00:23:33.160
a uniform or similar way.

284
00:23:33.160 --> 00:23:37.700
Ideal types are constructed and employed on the basis of a definite mode of understanding

285
00:23:37.700 --> 00:23:43.960
in the course of events, whether in order to forecast the future or to analyze the past.

286
00:23:43.960 --> 00:23:49.360
If in dealing with American elections one refers to the Italian vote, the implication

287
00:23:49.360 --> 00:23:53.960
is that there are voters of Italian descent whose voting is to some extent influenced

288
00:23:53.960 --> 00:23:56.520
by their Italian origin.

289
00:23:56.520 --> 00:24:00.380
That such a group of voters exists will hardly be denied.

290
00:24:00.380 --> 00:24:05.040
But people disagree widely as to the number of citizens included in this group and the

291
00:24:05.040 --> 00:24:10.040
the degree to which their voting is determined by their Italian ideologies.

292
00:24:10.040 --> 00:24:15.400
It is this uncertainty about the power of the ideology concerned, this impossibility

293
00:24:15.400 --> 00:24:19.360
of finding out and measuring its effect upon the minds of the individual members of the

294
00:24:19.360 --> 00:24:26.240
group, that characterizes the ideal type as such and distinguishes it from real types.

295
00:24:26.240 --> 00:24:32.280
An ideal type is a conceptual tool of understanding, and the service that it renders depends entirely

296
00:24:32.280 --> 00:24:36.760
on the serviceableness of the definite mode of understanding.

297
00:24:36.760 --> 00:24:42.480
Ideal types must not be confused with the types referred to in moral or political oughts,

298
00:24:42.480 --> 00:24:45.560
which we may call ought-types.

299
00:24:45.560 --> 00:24:51.200
The Marxians contend that all proletarians necessarily behave in a definite way, and

300
00:24:51.200 --> 00:24:55.480
the Nazis make the analogous statement with regard to all Germans.

301
00:24:55.480 --> 00:25:00.240
But neither of these parties can deny that its declaration is untenable as a proposition

302
00:25:00.240 --> 00:25:05.480
about what is, since there are proletarians and Germans who deviate from the modes of

303
00:25:05.480 --> 00:25:10.680
acting, which these parties call proletarian and German respectively.

304
00:25:10.680 --> 00:25:15.720
What they really have in mind in announcing their dicta is a moral obligation.

305
00:25:15.720 --> 00:25:21.760
What they mean is, every proletarian ought to act the way the party program and its legitimate

306
00:25:21.760 --> 00:25:24.920
expositors declare to be proletarian.

307
00:25:24.920 --> 00:25:30.480
The German ought to act the way the Nationalist Party considers genuinely German.

308
00:25:30.480 --> 00:25:35.360
Those proletarians or Germans whose conduct does not comply with the rules are smeared

309
00:25:35.360 --> 00:25:36.880
as traitors.

310
00:25:36.880 --> 00:25:42.680
The ought type belongs to the terminology of ethics and politics and not to that of

311
00:25:42.680 --> 00:25:46.640
the epistemology of the science of human action.

312
00:25:46.640 --> 00:25:52.520
It is furthermore necessary to separate ideal types from organizations having the same name.

313
00:25:52.520 --> 00:25:57.280
In dealing with 19th century French history, we frequently encounter references to the

314
00:25:57.280 --> 00:26:00.400
Jesuits and to the Freemasons.

315
00:26:00.400 --> 00:26:05.460
These terms may refer to acts of the organizations designated by these names.

316
00:26:05.460 --> 00:26:11.640
For example, the Jesuit Order opened a new school, or the lodges of the Freemasons donated

317
00:26:11.640 --> 00:26:15.720
a sum of money for the relief of people who suffered in a fire.

318
00:26:15.720 --> 00:26:20.860
Or they may refer to ideal types, pointing out that members of these organizations and

319
00:26:20.860 --> 00:26:26.060
and their friends are in definite respects acting under the sway of a definite Jesuit

320
00:26:26.060 --> 00:26:28.420
or Masonic ideology.

321
00:26:28.420 --> 00:26:32.780
There is a difference between stating that a political movement is organized, guided,

322
00:26:32.780 --> 00:26:37.460
and financed by the order or the lodges as such and saying that it is inspired by an

323
00:26:37.460 --> 00:26:42.380
ideology of which the order or the lodges are considered the typical or outstanding

324
00:26:42.380 --> 00:26:44.340
representatives.

325
00:26:44.340 --> 00:26:48.540
The first proposition has no reference to the specific understanding.

326
00:26:48.540 --> 00:26:52.820
It concerns facts that could be confirmed or disproved by the study of records and the

327
00:26:52.820 --> 00:26:54.860
hearing of witnesses.

328
00:26:54.860 --> 00:26:58.620
The second assertion regards understanding.

329
00:26:58.620 --> 00:27:04.340
In order to form a judgment on its adequacy or inadequacy, one has to analyze ideas and

330
00:27:04.340 --> 00:27:07.820
doctrines and their bearing upon actions and events.

331
00:27:07.820 --> 00:27:12.580
Methodologically, there is a fundamental difference between the analysis of the impact of the

332
00:27:12.580 --> 00:27:18.340
ideology of Marxian socialism upon the mentality and the conduct of our contemporaries and

333
00:27:18.340 --> 00:27:25.300
The Study of the Actions of the Various Communist and Socialist Governments, Parties and Conspiracies

334
00:27:25.300 --> 00:27:29.860
There is a distinction between the communist party or a communist party as an organized

335
00:27:29.860 --> 00:27:35.180
body on the one hand and the communist Marxian ideology on the other.

336
00:27:35.180 --> 00:27:40.020
In dealing with contemporary history and politics, people often fail to realize the fact that

337
00:27:40.020 --> 00:27:45.820
many people who are not members, card-bearing or dues-paying members, of a party organization

338
00:27:45.820 --> 00:27:52.780
may be, either totally or in certain regards, under the sway of the party ideology.

339
00:27:52.780 --> 00:27:57.280
Especially in weighing the strength of the ideas of communism or those of Nazism in Germany

340
00:27:57.280 --> 00:28:02.180
or of fascism in Italy, serious confusion resulted from this error.

341
00:28:02.180 --> 00:28:07.340
Furthermore, it is necessary to know that an ideology may sometimes also influence the

342
00:28:07.340 --> 00:28:13.160
minds of those who believe that they are entirely untouched by it or who even consider themselves

343
00:28:13.160 --> 00:28:43.160
The Success of Nazism in Germany in 1933 was due to the fact that the immense majority of the Germans, even of those voting the ticket of the Marxist parties, of the Catholic centrum party, and of the various bourgeois splinter parties, were committed to the ideas of radical aggressive nationalism, while the Nazis themselves had adopted the basic principles of the socialist program. Great Britain would not have gone socialist if the conservatives

344
00:28:43.160 --> 00:28:55.120
The service a definite ideal type renders to the acting man in his endeavors to anticipate

345
00:28:55.120 --> 00:29:00.760
future events and to the historian in his analysis of the past is dependent on the specific

346
00:29:00.760 --> 00:29:04.080
understanding that led to its construction.

347
00:29:04.080 --> 00:29:09.060
To question the usefulness of an ideal type for explaining a definite problem, one must

348
00:29:09.060 --> 00:29:12.700
criticize the mode of understanding involved.

349
00:29:12.700 --> 00:29:19.340
In dealing with conditions in Latin America, the ideal type, general, may be of some use.

350
00:29:19.340 --> 00:29:23.660
There have been definite ideologies current, which in some respects determine the role

351
00:29:23.660 --> 00:29:29.420
played by many, not by all, army leaders who became important in politics.

352
00:29:29.420 --> 00:29:34.760
In France, too, ideas prevailed that by and large circumscribed the position of generals

353
00:29:34.760 --> 00:29:42.340
in politics and the role of such men as Kevignac, MacMahon, Boulanger, Pétain, and de Gaulle.

354
00:29:42.340 --> 00:29:47.340
But in the United States, it would make no sense to employ the ideal type of a political

355
00:29:47.340 --> 00:29:50.740
general or a general in politics.

356
00:29:50.740 --> 00:29:56.740
No American ideology exists that would consider the armed forces as a separate entity distinguished

357
00:29:56.740 --> 00:30:00.820
from and opposed to the civilian population.

358
00:30:00.820 --> 00:30:05.440
There is consequently no political esprit de corps in the army, and its leaders have

359
00:30:05.440 --> 00:30:09.340
no authoritarian prestige among civilians.

360
00:30:09.340 --> 00:30:14.940
A general who becomes president ceases not only legally but also politically to be a

361
00:30:14.940 --> 00:30:17.580
member of the army.

362
00:30:17.580 --> 00:30:22.660
In referring to ideal types, the historian of the past as well as the historian of the

363
00:30:22.660 --> 00:30:29.180
future, that is, acting man, must never forget that there is a fundamental difference between

364
00:30:29.180 --> 00:30:34.480
the reactions of the objects of the natural sciences and those of men.

365
00:30:34.480 --> 00:30:39.260
It is this difference that people have wanted to bring into relief in speaking of the opposition

366
00:30:39.260 --> 00:30:45.260
of Mind and Matter, of Freedom of the Will, and of Individuality.

367
00:30:45.260 --> 00:30:49.800
Ideal types are expedients to simplify the treatment of the puzzling multiplicity and

368
00:30:49.800 --> 00:30:52.340
variety of human affairs.

369
00:30:52.340 --> 00:30:59.180
In employing them, one must always be aware of the deficiencies of any kind of simplification.

370
00:30:59.180 --> 00:31:05.500
The exuberance and variability of human life and action cannot be fully seized by concepts

371
00:31:05.500 --> 00:31:07.500
and definitions.

372
00:31:07.500 --> 00:31:13.620
Some unanswered or even unanswerable questions always remain, some problems whose solution

373
00:31:13.620 --> 00:31:16.780
passes the ability even of the greatest minds.