WEBVTT

NOTE 3. The Quest for Absolute Values

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.560
Chapter 3 The Quest for Absolute Values

2
00:00:05.560 --> 00:00:09.160
1.

3
00:00:09.160 --> 00:00:14.700
The Issue In dealing with judgments of value, we refer

4
00:00:14.700 --> 00:00:21.000
to facts, that is, to the way in which people really choose ultimate ends.

5
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:25.400
While the value judgments of many people are identical, while it is permissible to speak

6
00:00:25.400 --> 00:00:55.400
of Money, The Theory of Money and State, The Theory

7
00:00:55.400 --> 00:01:01.160
of Nature, they have preferred the state of civilization, for they sought the closest possible

8
00:01:01.160 --> 00:01:07.640
attainment of certain ends, the preservation of life and health, which, as they rightly thought,

9
00:01:07.640 --> 00:01:14.840
require social cooperation. But it is a fact that there have been and are also men who have rejected

10
00:01:14.840 --> 00:01:20.840
these values and consequently preferred the solitary life of an anchorite to life within society.

11
00:01:20.840 --> 00:01:27.820
It is thus obvious that any scientific treatment of the problems of value judgments must take

12
00:01:27.820 --> 00:01:33.960
into full account the fact that these judgments are subjective and changing.

13
00:01:33.960 --> 00:01:40.160
Science seeks to know what is and to formulate existential propositions describing the universe

14
00:01:40.160 --> 00:01:41.760
as it is.

15
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:46.480
With regard to judgments of value, it cannot assert more than that they are uttered by

16
00:01:46.480 --> 00:01:52.720
by some people and inquire what the effects of action guided by them must be.

17
00:01:52.720 --> 00:01:57.420
Any step beyond these limits is tantamount to substituting a personal judgment of value

18
00:01:57.420 --> 00:02:00.600
for knowledge of reality.

19
00:02:00.600 --> 00:02:07.680
Science and our organized body of knowledge teach only what is, not what ought to be.

20
00:02:07.680 --> 00:02:13.300
This distinction between a field of science dealing exclusively with existential propositions

21
00:02:13.300 --> 00:02:18.540
and a field of judgments of value has been rejected by the doctrines that maintain there

22
00:02:18.540 --> 00:02:24.300
are eternal absolute values which it is just as much the task of scientific or philosophical

23
00:02:24.300 --> 00:02:29.020
inquiry to discover as to discover the laws of physics.

24
00:02:29.020 --> 00:02:34.900
The supporters of these doctrines contend that there is an absolute hierarchy of values.

25
00:02:34.900 --> 00:02:38.120
They try to define the supreme good.

26
00:02:38.120 --> 00:02:43.240
They said it is permissible and necessary to distinguish in the same way between true

27
00:02:43.240 --> 00:02:49.880
and false, correct and incorrect judgments of value as between true and false, correct

28
00:02:49.880 --> 00:02:53.960
and incorrect existential propositions.

29
00:02:53.960 --> 00:02:57.760
Science is not restricted to the description of what is.

30
00:02:57.760 --> 00:03:03.080
There is, in their opinion, another fully legitimate branch of science, the normative

31
00:03:03.080 --> 00:03:09.040
of Science of Ethics, whose task it is to show the true absolute values and to set up

32
00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:12.560
norms for the correct conduct of men.

33
00:03:12.560 --> 00:03:18.000
The plight of our age, according to the supporters of this philosophy, is that people no longer

34
00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:24.420
acknowledge these eternal values and do not let their actions be guided by them.

35
00:03:24.420 --> 00:03:29.180
Conditions were much better in the past, when the peoples of Western civilization were unanimous

36
00:03:29.180 --> 00:03:32.620
in endorsing the values of Christian ethics.

37
00:03:32.620 --> 00:03:43.620
2. CONFLICTS WITHIN SOCIETY

38
00:03:43.620 --> 00:03:48.060
Having discussed the fact that men disagree with regard to their judgments of value and

39
00:03:48.060 --> 00:03:53.780
their choice of ultimate ends, we must stress that many conflicts which are commonly considered

40
00:03:53.780 --> 00:03:59.420
valuational are actually caused by disagreement concerning the choice of the best means to

41
00:03:59.420 --> 00:04:03.920
to attain ends about which the conflicting parties agree.

42
00:04:03.920 --> 00:04:09.820
The problem of the suitability or unsuitability of definite means is to be solved by existential

43
00:04:09.820 --> 00:04:13.720
propositions, not by judgments of value.

44
00:04:13.720 --> 00:04:17.860
Its treatment is the main topic of applied science.

45
00:04:17.860 --> 00:04:22.620
It is thus necessary to be aware in dealing with controversies concerning human conduct

46
00:04:22.620 --> 00:04:28.220
whether the disagreement refers to the choice of ends or to that of means.

47
00:04:28.220 --> 00:04:35.940
This is often a difficult task, for the same things our ends to some people means to others.

48
00:04:35.940 --> 00:04:41.620
With the exception of the small, almost negligible number of consistent anchorites, all people

49
00:04:41.620 --> 00:04:48.060
agree in considering some kind of social cooperation between men the foremost means to attain any

50
00:04:48.060 --> 00:04:50.480
ends they may aim at.

51
00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:55.420
This undeniable fact provides a common ground on which political discussions between men

52
00:04:55.420 --> 00:04:57.660
become possible.

53
00:04:57.660 --> 00:05:03.780
The spiritual and intellectual unity of all specimens of homo sapiens manifests itself

54
00:05:03.780 --> 00:05:09.900
in the fact that the immense majority of men consider the same thing social cooperation,

55
00:05:09.900 --> 00:05:15.980
the best means of satisfying the biological urge present in every living being to preserve

56
00:05:15.980 --> 00:05:20.860
the life and health of the individual and to propagate the species.

57
00:05:20.860 --> 00:05:26.020
It is permissible to call this almost universal acceptance of social cooperation a natural

58
00:05:26.020 --> 00:05:27.860
Phenomenon.

59
00:05:27.860 --> 00:05:32.200
In resorting to this mode of expression and asserting that conscious association is in

60
00:05:32.200 --> 00:05:39.020
conformity with human nature, one implies that man is characterized as man by reason,

61
00:05:39.020 --> 00:05:44.980
is thus enabled to become aware of the great principle of cosmic becoming and evolution,

62
00:05:44.980 --> 00:05:50.900
that is to say differentiation and integration, and to make intentional use of this principle

63
00:05:50.900 --> 00:05:53.740
to improve his condition.

64
00:05:53.740 --> 00:05:58.500
But one must not consider cooperation among the individuals of a biological species a

65
00:05:58.500 --> 00:06:01.740
universal natural phenomenon.

66
00:06:01.740 --> 00:06:07.360
The means of sustenance are scarce for every species of living beings, hence biological

67
00:06:07.360 --> 00:06:12.860
competition prevails among the members of all species and irreconcilable conflict of

68
00:06:12.860 --> 00:06:15.220
vital interests.

69
00:06:15.220 --> 00:06:19.280
Only a part of those who come into existence can survive.

70
00:06:19.280 --> 00:06:24.280
Some perish because others of their own species have snatched away from them the means of

71
00:06:24.280 --> 00:06:25.280
sustenance.

72
00:06:25.280 --> 00:06:31.040
An implacable struggle for existence goes on among the members of each species precisely

73
00:06:31.040 --> 00:06:36.800
because they are of the same species and compete with other members of it for the same scarce

74
00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:40.560
opportunities of survival and reproduction.

75
00:06:40.560 --> 00:06:48.200
Man alone, by dint of his reason, substituted social cooperation for biological competition.

76
00:06:48.200 --> 00:06:53.640
What made social cooperation possible is, of course, a natural phenomenon, the higher

77
00:06:53.640 --> 00:06:58.600
productivity of labor accomplished under the principle of the division of labor and specialization

78
00:06:58.600 --> 00:07:00.320
of tasks.

79
00:07:00.320 --> 00:07:06.560
But it was necessary to discover this principle, to comprehend its bearing upon human affairs,

80
00:07:06.560 --> 00:07:11.880
and to employ it consciously as a means in the struggle for existence.

81
00:07:11.880 --> 00:07:16.480
The fundamental facts about social cooperation have been misinterpreted by the School of

82
00:07:16.480 --> 00:07:20.640
of Social Darwinism as well as by many of its critics.

83
00:07:20.640 --> 00:07:26.220
The former maintained that war among men is an inevitable phenomenon and that all attempts

84
00:07:26.220 --> 00:07:31.080
to bring about lasting peace among nations are contrary to nature.

85
00:07:31.080 --> 00:07:35.520
The latter retorted that the struggle for existence is not among members of the same

86
00:07:35.520 --> 00:07:40.080
animal species but among the members of various species.

87
00:07:40.080 --> 00:07:46.200
As a rule, tigers do not attack other tigers but, taking the line of least resistance,

88
00:08:16.200 --> 00:08:46.200
The Theory of Money and Credit

89
00:08:46.200 --> 00:08:51.760
of the same hill and bees of the same swarm, among the brood hatched by common parents

90
00:08:51.760 --> 00:08:55.600
and among the seeds ripened by the same plant.

91
00:08:55.600 --> 00:09:02.960
Only man has the power to escape to some extent from the rule of this law by intentional cooperation.

92
00:09:02.960 --> 00:09:07.840
So long as there is social cooperation and population has not increased beyond the optimum

93
00:09:07.840 --> 00:09:12.160
size, biological competition is suspended.

94
00:09:12.160 --> 00:09:16.820
It is therefore inappropriate to refer to animals and plants in dealing with the social

95
00:09:16.820 --> 00:09:19.120
problems of man.

96
00:09:19.120 --> 00:09:24.000
Yet man's almost universal acknowledgement of the principle of social cooperation did

97
00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:28.800
not result in agreement regarding all inter-human relations.

98
00:09:28.800 --> 00:09:33.820
While almost all men agree in looking upon social cooperation as the foremost means for

99
00:09:33.820 --> 00:09:39.920
realizing all human ends, whatever they may be, they disagree as to the extent to which

100
00:09:39.920 --> 00:09:44.840
Research, Peaceful Social Cooperation is a suitable means for attaining their ends and

101
00:09:44.840 --> 00:09:48.080
how far it should be resorted to.

102
00:09:48.080 --> 00:09:53.680
Those whom we may call the Harmonists base their arguments on Ricardo's Law of Association

103
00:09:53.680 --> 00:09:56.960
and on Malthus' Principle of Population.

104
00:09:56.960 --> 00:10:03.180
They do not, as some of their critics believe, assume that all men are biologically equal.

105
00:10:03.180 --> 00:10:07.640
They take fully into account the fact that there are innate biological differences among

106
00:10:07.640 --> 00:10:37.640
The Theory of Money and Credit

107
00:10:37.640 --> 00:10:41.840
In any given state of the supply of capital goods and knowledge of how to make the best

108
00:10:41.840 --> 00:10:47.200
use of natural resources, an optimum size of population.

109
00:10:47.200 --> 00:10:53.480
So long as population has not increased beyond this size, the addition of newcomers improves

110
00:10:53.480 --> 00:10:58.460
rather than impairs the conditions of those already cooperating.

111
00:10:58.460 --> 00:11:04.500
In the philosophy of the anti-harmonists, the various schools of nationalism and racism,

112
00:11:04.500 --> 00:11:08.480
Two different lines of reasoning must be distinguished.

113
00:11:08.480 --> 00:11:13.360
One is the doctrine of the irreconcilable antagonism prevailing among various groups,

114
00:11:13.360 --> 00:11:15.840
such as nations or races.

115
00:11:15.840 --> 00:11:21.880
As the anti-harmonists see it, community of interests exists only within the group among

116
00:11:21.880 --> 00:11:23.620
its members.

117
00:11:23.620 --> 00:11:29.440
The interests of each group and of each of its members are implacably opposed to those

118
00:11:29.440 --> 00:11:34.560
is of all other groups and of each of their members.

119
00:11:34.560 --> 00:11:40.200
So it is natural there should be perpetual war among various groups.

120
00:11:40.200 --> 00:11:45.280
This natural state of war of each group against every other group may sometimes be interrupted

121
00:11:45.280 --> 00:11:50.300
by periods of armistice, falsely labeled periods of peace.

122
00:11:50.300 --> 00:11:55.560
It may also happen that sometimes in warfare a group cooperates in alliances with other

123
00:11:55.560 --> 00:11:57.020
groups.

124
00:11:57.020 --> 00:12:01.460
Such alliances are temporary makeshifts of politics.

125
00:12:01.460 --> 00:12:07.020
They do not in the long run affect the inexorable natural conflict of interests.

126
00:12:07.020 --> 00:12:12.420
Having in cooperation with some allied groups defeated several of the hostile groups, the

127
00:12:12.420 --> 00:12:17.540
leading group in the coalition turns against its previous allies in order to annihilate

128
00:12:17.540 --> 00:12:22.740
them too and to establish its own world supremacy.

129
00:12:22.740 --> 00:12:28.300
The second dogma of the nationalist and racist philosophies is considered by its supporters

130
00:12:28.300 --> 00:12:32.860
a logical conclusion derived from their first dogma.

131
00:12:32.860 --> 00:12:39.440
As they see it, human conditions involve forever irreconcilable conflicts, first among the

132
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:44.820
various groups fighting one another, later, after the final victory of the master group,

133
00:12:44.820 --> 00:12:49.260
between the latter and the enslaved rest of mankind.

134
00:12:49.260 --> 00:12:54.780
Hence this supreme elite group must always be ready to fight, first to crush the rival

135
00:12:54.780 --> 00:12:58.380
groups, then to quell rebellions of the slaves.

136
00:12:58.380 --> 00:13:04.020
The state of perpetual preparedness for war enjoins upon it the necessity of organizing

137
00:13:04.020 --> 00:13:07.340
society after the pattern of an army.

138
00:13:07.340 --> 00:13:13.020
The army is not an instrument destined to serve a body politic, it is rather the very

139
00:13:13.020 --> 00:13:19.700
Essence of Social Cooperation, to which all other social institutions are subservient.

140
00:13:19.700 --> 00:13:25.420
The individuals are not citizens of a commonwealth, they are soldiers of a fighting force, and

141
00:13:25.420 --> 00:13:31.300
as such bound to obey unconditionally the orders issued by the supreme commander.

142
00:13:31.300 --> 00:13:35.020
They have no civil rights, merely military duties.

143
00:13:35.020 --> 00:13:41.500
Thus, even the fact that the immense majority of men look upon social cooperation as the

144
00:13:41.500 --> 00:13:58.440
3. A Remark on the Alleged Medieval Unanimity

145
00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:04.260
In examining the doctrines of eternal absolute values, we must also ask whether it is true

146
00:14:04.260 --> 00:14:09.540
or not that there was a period of history in which all peoples of the West were united

147
00:14:09.540 --> 00:14:14.380
in their acceptance of a uniform system of ethical norms.

148
00:14:14.380 --> 00:14:19.060
Until the beginning of the fourth century, the Christian creed was spread by voluntary

149
00:14:19.060 --> 00:14:20.740
conversions.

150
00:14:20.740 --> 00:14:25.700
There were also later voluntary conversions of individuals and of whole peoples.

151
00:14:25.700 --> 00:14:31.620
But from the days of Theodosius I on, the sword began to play a prominent role in the

152
00:14:31.620 --> 00:14:34.700
dissemination of Christianity.

153
00:14:34.700 --> 00:14:40.760
Christians and heretics were compelled by force of arms to submit to the Christian teachings.

154
00:14:40.760 --> 00:14:46.460
For many centuries religious problems were decided by the outcome of battles and wars.

155
00:14:46.460 --> 00:14:50.860
Military campaigns determined the religious allegiance of nations.

156
00:14:50.860 --> 00:14:56.200
Christians of the East were forced to accept the creed of Mohammed and pagans in Europe

157
00:14:56.200 --> 00:15:00.840
and America were forced to accept the Christian faith.

158
00:15:00.840 --> 00:15:06.780
Their power was instrumental in the struggle between the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation.

159
00:15:06.780 --> 00:15:11.560
There was religious uniformity in Europe of the Middle Ages as both paganism and heresies

160
00:15:11.560 --> 00:15:15.240
were eradicated with fire and sword.

161
00:15:15.240 --> 00:15:21.260
All of Western and Central Europe recognized the Pope as the vicar of Christ.

162
00:15:21.260 --> 00:15:26.240
But this did not mean that all people agreed in their judgments of value and in the principles

163
00:15:26.240 --> 00:15:28.520
directing their conduct.

164
00:15:28.520 --> 00:15:34.620
There were few people in medieval Europe who lived according to the precepts of the Gospels.

165
00:15:34.620 --> 00:15:39.160
Much has been said and written about the truly Christian spirit of the code of chivalry and

166
00:15:39.160 --> 00:15:43.920
about the religious idealism that guided the conduct of the knights.

167
00:15:43.920 --> 00:15:50.360
Yet anything less compatible with Luke chapter 6 verses 27 through 29 than the rules of chivalry

168
00:15:50.360 --> 00:15:52.860
can hardly be conceived.

169
00:15:52.860 --> 00:15:57.580
The gallant knights certainly did not love their enemies, they did not bless those who

170
00:15:57.580 --> 00:16:09.580
The Catholic Church had the power to prevent scholars and writers from challenging the

171
00:16:09.580 --> 00:16:15.300
dogmas as defined by the pope and the councils and to force the secular rulers to yield to

172
00:16:15.300 --> 00:16:17.980
some of its political claims.

173
00:16:17.980 --> 00:16:22.920
But it could preserve its position only by condoning conduct on the part of the laity

174
00:16:22.920 --> 00:16:27.700
which defied most if not all of the principles of the Gospels.

175
00:16:27.700 --> 00:16:32.280
The values that determined the actions of the ruling classes were entirely different

176
00:16:32.280 --> 00:16:34.960
from those that the Church preached.

177
00:16:34.960 --> 00:16:40.840
Neither did the peasants comply with Matthew chapter 6 verses 25 through 28, and there

178
00:16:40.840 --> 00:16:47.400
were courts and judges in defiance of Matthew chapter 7 verse 1, Judge not, that you be

179
00:16:47.400 --> 00:16:55.960
4. THE IDEA OF NATURAL LAW

180
00:16:55.960 --> 00:17:01.120
The most momentous attempt to find an absolute and eternal standard of value is presented

181
00:17:01.120 --> 00:17:07.680
by the doctrine of natural law. The term natural law has been claimed by various schools of

182
00:17:07.680 --> 00:17:13.400
philosophy and jurisprudence. Many doctrines have appealed to nature in order to provide

183
00:17:13.400 --> 00:17:16.400
a justification for their postulates.

184
00:17:16.400 --> 00:17:22.340
Many manifestly spurious theses have been advanced under the label of natural law.

185
00:17:22.340 --> 00:17:27.440
It was not difficult to explode the fallacies common to most of these lines of thought,

186
00:17:27.440 --> 00:17:32.040
and it is no wonder that many thinkers become suspicious as soon as natural law is referred

187
00:17:32.040 --> 00:17:33.040
to.

188
00:17:33.040 --> 00:17:38.360
Yet it would be a serious blunder to ignore the fact that all the varieties of the doctrine

189
00:17:38.360 --> 00:17:43.400
contained a sound idea which could neither be compromised by a connection with untenable

190
00:17:43.400 --> 00:17:47.200
vagaries nor discredited by any criticism.

191
00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:52.220
Long before the classical economists discovered that irregularity in the sequence of phenomena

192
00:17:52.220 --> 00:17:57.500
prevails in the field of human action, the champions of natural law were dimly aware

193
00:17:57.500 --> 00:18:00.340
of this inescapable fact.

194
00:18:00.340 --> 00:18:05.560
From the bewildering diversity of doctrines presented under the rubric of natural law,

195
00:18:05.560 --> 00:18:08.600
There finally emerged a set of theorems which no

196
00:18:08.600 --> 00:18:11.880
cavelling can ever invalidate.

197
00:18:11.880 --> 00:18:17.600
There is first the idea that a nature-given order of things exists to which man must adjust

198
00:18:17.600 --> 00:18:20.680
his actions if he wants to succeed.

199
00:18:20.680 --> 00:18:26.240
Second, the only means available to man for the cognizance of this order is thinking and

200
00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:32.160
reasoning and no existing social institution is exempt from being examined and appraised

201
00:18:32.160 --> 00:18:34.200
by discursive reasoning.

202
00:18:34.200 --> 00:18:40.160
Third, there is no standard available for appraising any mode of acting either of individuals

203
00:18:40.160 --> 00:18:45.940
or of groups of individuals, but that of the effects produced by such action.

204
00:18:45.940 --> 00:18:51.400
Carried to its ultimate logical consequences, the idea of natural law led eventually to

205
00:18:51.400 --> 00:18:55.320
rationalism and utilitarianism.

206
00:18:55.320 --> 00:19:00.920
The march of social philosophy toward this inescapable conclusion was slowed down by

207
00:19:00.920 --> 00:19:04.440
by many obstacles which could not be removed easily.

208
00:19:04.440 --> 00:19:10.340
There were numerous pitfalls on the way and many inhibitions hampered the philosophers.

209
00:19:10.340 --> 00:19:15.040
To deal with the vicissitudes of the evolution of these doctrines is a task of the history

210
00:19:15.040 --> 00:19:16.860
of philosophy.

211
00:19:16.860 --> 00:19:22.420
In the context of our investigation, it is enough to mention only two of these problems.

212
00:19:22.420 --> 00:19:27.580
There was the antagonism between the teachings of reason and the dogmas of the church.

213
00:19:27.580 --> 00:19:32.820
Human philosophers were prepared to ascribe unconditional supremacy to the latter.

214
00:19:32.820 --> 00:19:38.460
Truth and certainty, they declared, are to be found only in revelation.

215
00:19:38.460 --> 00:19:44.940
Man's reason can err, and man can never be sure that his speculations were not led astray

216
00:19:44.940 --> 00:19:46.780
by Satan.

217
00:19:46.780 --> 00:19:50.880
Other thinkers did not accept this solution of the antagonism.

218
00:19:50.880 --> 00:19:56.460
To reject reason beforehand was, in their opinion, preposterous.

219
00:19:56.460 --> 00:20:02.680
Reason too stems from God, who endowed man with it, so there can be no genuine contradiction

220
00:20:02.680 --> 00:20:06.620
between dogma and the correct teachings of reason.

221
00:20:06.620 --> 00:20:12.320
It is the task of philosophy to show that ultimately both agree.

222
00:20:12.320 --> 00:20:17.700
The central problem of scholastic philosophy was to demonstrate that human reason, unaided

223
00:20:17.700 --> 00:20:24.300
by revelation and holy writ, taking recourse only to its proper methods of radiosynation,

224
00:20:24.300 --> 00:20:30.340
is capable of proving the apodictic truth of the revealed dogmas, a genuine conflict

225
00:20:30.340 --> 00:20:38.380
of faith and reason does not exist, natural law and divine law do not disagree.

226
00:20:38.380 --> 00:20:44.140
However, this way of dealing with the matter does not remove the antagonism, it merely

227
00:20:44.140 --> 00:20:47.220
shifts it to another field.

228
00:20:47.220 --> 00:20:53.620
The conflict is no longer a conflict between faith and reason, but between Thomist philosophy

229
00:20:53.620 --> 00:20:56.620
and Other Modes of Philosophizing.

230
00:20:56.620 --> 00:21:02.020
We may leave aside the genuine dogmas such as creation, incarnation, the trinity, as

231
00:21:02.020 --> 00:21:06.300
they have no direct bearing on the problems of inter-human relations.

232
00:21:06.300 --> 00:21:12.320
But many issues remain with regard to which most if not all Christian churches and denominations

233
00:21:12.320 --> 00:21:17.580
are not prepared to yield to secular reasoning and an evaluation from the point of view of

234
00:21:17.580 --> 00:21:19.980
social utility.

235
00:21:19.980 --> 00:21:26.340
Thus the recognition of natural law on the part of Christian theology was only conditional.

236
00:21:26.340 --> 00:21:32.020
It referred to a definite type of natural law, not opposed to the teachings of Christ as

237
00:21:32.020 --> 00:21:35.560
each of these churches and denominations interpreted them.

238
00:21:35.560 --> 00:21:39.220
It did not acknowledge the supremacy of reason.

239
00:21:39.220 --> 00:21:44.180
It was incompatible with the principles of utilitarian philosophy.

240
00:21:44.180 --> 00:21:49.140
A second factor that obstructed the evolution of natural law toward a consistent and comprehensive

241
00:21:49.140 --> 00:21:56.380
of System of Human Action, was the erroneous theory of the biological equality of all men.

242
00:21:56.380 --> 00:22:01.300
In repudiating arguments advanced in favor of legal discrimination among men and of a

243
00:22:01.300 --> 00:22:07.860
status society, many advocates of equality before the law overstepped the mark.

244
00:22:07.860 --> 00:22:14.540
To hold that, at birth human infants, regardless of their heredity, are as equal as Fords,

245
00:22:14.540 --> 00:22:21.520
is to deny facts so obvious that it brought the whole philosophy of natural law into disrepute.

246
00:22:21.520 --> 00:22:28.280
In insisting on biological equality, the natural law doctrine pushed aside all the sound arguments

247
00:22:28.280 --> 00:22:32.660
advanced in favor of the principle of equality before the law.

248
00:22:32.660 --> 00:22:38.080
It thus opened the way for the spread of theories advocating all sorts of legal discrimination

249
00:22:38.080 --> 00:22:41.820
against individuals and groups of individuals.

250
00:22:41.820 --> 00:22:45.740
It supplanted the teachings of liberal social philosophy.

251
00:22:45.740 --> 00:22:51.460
Stirring up hatred and violence, foreign wars and domestic revolutions, it prepared mankind

252
00:22:51.460 --> 00:22:56.500
for the acceptance of aggressive nationalism and racism.

253
00:22:56.500 --> 00:23:01.980
The chief accomplishment of the natural law idea was its rejection of the doctrine, sometimes

254
00:23:01.980 --> 00:23:07.660
called legal positivism, according to which the ultimate source of statute law is to be

255
00:23:07.660 --> 00:23:12.580
be seen in the superior military power of the legislator, who is in a position to beat

256
00:23:12.580 --> 00:23:17.380
into submission all those defying his ordinances.

257
00:23:17.380 --> 00:23:22.620
Natural law taught that statutory laws can be bad laws, and it contrasted with the bad

258
00:23:22.620 --> 00:23:27.860
laws, the good laws to which it described divine or natural origin.

259
00:23:27.860 --> 00:23:33.380
But it was an illusion to deny that the best system of laws cannot be put into practice

260
00:23:33.380 --> 00:23:37.620
Progress Unless Supported and Enforced by Military Supremacy

261
00:23:37.620 --> 00:23:42.500
The philosophers shut their eyes to manifest historical facts.

262
00:23:42.500 --> 00:23:47.740
They refused to admit that the causes they considered just made progress only because

263
00:23:47.740 --> 00:23:52.260
their partisans defeated the defenders of the bad causes.

264
00:23:52.260 --> 00:23:58.460
The Christian faith owes its success to a long series of victorious battles and campaigns

265
00:23:58.460 --> 00:24:04.620
from various battles between rival Roman Imperators and Caesars down to the campaigns that opened

266
00:24:04.620 --> 00:24:10.860
the Orient to the activities of missionaries. The cause of American independence triumphed

267
00:24:10.860 --> 00:24:16.620
because the British forces were defeated by the insurgents and the French. It is a sad

268
00:24:16.620 --> 00:24:23.100
truth that Mars is for the big battalions, not for the good causes.

269
00:24:23.100 --> 00:24:29.060
To maintain the opposite opinion implies the belief that the outcome of an armed conflict

270
00:24:29.060 --> 00:24:34.660
is an ordeal by combat in which God always grants victory to the champions of the just

271
00:24:34.660 --> 00:24:36.380
cause.

272
00:24:36.380 --> 00:24:41.420
But such an assumption would annul all the essentials of the doctrine of natural law,

273
00:24:41.420 --> 00:24:47.300
whose basic idea was to contrast to the positive laws promulgated and enforced by those in

274
00:24:47.300 --> 00:24:53.060
power a higher law grounded in the innermost nature of man.

275
00:24:53.060 --> 00:24:58.720
that all these deficiencies and contradictions of the doctrine of natural law must not prevent

276
00:24:58.720 --> 00:25:05.220
us from recognizing its sound nucleus. Hidden in a heap of illusions and quite arbitrary

277
00:25:05.220 --> 00:25:11.640
prepossessions was the idea that every valid law of a country was open to critical examination

278
00:25:11.640 --> 00:25:18.140
by reason. About the standard to be applied in such an examination, the older representatives

279
00:25:18.140 --> 00:25:21.420
Students of the school had only vague notions.

280
00:25:21.420 --> 00:25:25.860
They referred to nature and were reluctant to admit that the ultimate standard of good

281
00:25:25.860 --> 00:25:31.580
and bad must be found in the effects produced by a law.

282
00:25:31.580 --> 00:25:37.680
Utilitarianism finally completed the intellectual evolution inaugurated by the Greek sophists.

283
00:25:37.680 --> 00:25:43.860
But neither utilitarianism nor any of the varieties of the doctrine of natural law could or did

284
00:25:43.860 --> 00:26:13.860
The Theory of Money and Credit

285
00:26:13.860 --> 00:26:34.120
Revealed religion derives its authority and authenticity from the communication to man

286
00:26:34.120 --> 00:26:36.620
of the supreme being's will.

287
00:26:36.620 --> 00:26:39.700
It gives the faithful indisputable certainty.

288
00:26:39.700 --> 00:26:45.340
However, people disagree widely about the content of revealed truth as well as about

289
00:26:45.340 --> 00:26:49.140
its correct, orthodox interpretation.

290
00:26:49.140 --> 00:26:55.180
For all the grandeur, majesty and sublimity of religious feeling, irreconcilable conflict

291
00:26:55.180 --> 00:26:58.880
exists among various faiths and creeds.

292
00:26:58.880 --> 00:27:03.800
Even if unanimity could be attained in matters of the historical authenticity and reliability

293
00:27:03.800 --> 00:27:09.080
of revelation, the problem of the veracity of various exegetic interpretations would

294
00:27:09.080 --> 00:27:11.420
should still remain.

295
00:27:11.420 --> 00:27:17.600
Every faith claims to possess absolute certainty, but no religious faction knows of any peaceful

296
00:27:17.600 --> 00:27:22.940
means that will invariably induce dissenters to divest themselves voluntarily of their

297
00:27:22.940 --> 00:27:26.680
error and to adopt the true creed.

298
00:27:26.680 --> 00:27:31.040
If people of different faiths meet for peaceful discussion of their differences, they can

299
00:27:31.040 --> 00:27:37.280
find no common basis for their colloquy but the statement, By their fruits ye shall know

300
00:27:37.280 --> 00:27:39.040
them.

301
00:27:39.040 --> 00:27:44.720
But this utilitarian device is of no use so long as men disagree about the standard to

302
00:27:44.720 --> 00:27:47.720
be applied in judging the effects.

303
00:27:47.720 --> 00:27:52.720
The religious appeal to absolute eternal values did not do away with conflicting judgments

304
00:27:52.720 --> 00:27:53.980
of value.

305
00:27:53.980 --> 00:27:57.480
It merely resulted in religious wars.

306
00:27:57.480 --> 00:27:59.560
6.

307
00:27:59.560 --> 00:28:03.440
Atheistic Intuition

308
00:28:03.440 --> 00:28:08.080
Other attempts to discover an absolute standard of values were made without reference to a

309
00:28:08.080 --> 00:28:10.480
of Divine Reality.

310
00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:14.760
Emphatically rejecting all traditional religions and claiming for their teachings the epithet

311
00:28:14.760 --> 00:28:20.840
scientific, various writers tried to substitute a new faith for the old ones.

312
00:28:20.840 --> 00:28:26.640
They claimed to know precisely what the mysterious power that directs all cosmic becoming has

313
00:28:26.640 --> 00:28:29.160
in store for mankind.

314
00:28:29.160 --> 00:28:33.280
They proclaimed an absolute standard of values.

315
00:28:33.280 --> 00:28:38.480
Good is what works along the lines that this power wants mankind to follow.

316
00:28:38.480 --> 00:28:41.040
Everything else is bad.

317
00:28:41.040 --> 00:28:49.400
In their vocabulary, progressive is a synonym of good and reactionary a synonym of bad.

318
00:28:49.400 --> 00:28:54.440
Inevitably progress will triumph over reaction because it is impossible for men to divert

319
00:28:54.440 --> 00:29:00.920
the course of history from the direction prescribed by the plan of the mysterious prime mover.

320
00:29:00.920 --> 00:29:08.400
Such is the metaphysics of Karl Marx, the faith of contemporary self-styled progressivism.

321
00:29:08.400 --> 00:29:11.480
Marxism is a revolutionary doctrine.

322
00:29:11.480 --> 00:29:16.600
It expressly declares that the design of the prime mover will be accomplished by civil

323
00:29:16.600 --> 00:29:17.600
war.

324
00:29:17.600 --> 00:29:22.900
It implies that ultimately in the battles of these campaigns the just cause, that is,

325
00:29:22.900 --> 00:29:26.700
the cause of progress, must conquer.

326
00:29:26.700 --> 00:29:31.440
In all conflicts concerning judgments of value will disappear.

327
00:29:31.440 --> 00:29:37.940
The liquidation of all dissenters will establish the undisputed supremacy of the absolute eternal

328
00:29:37.940 --> 00:29:39.340
values.

329
00:29:39.340 --> 00:29:45.180
This formula for the solution of conflicts of value judgments is certainly not new.

330
00:29:45.180 --> 00:29:49.860
It is a device known and practiced from time immemorial.

331
00:29:49.860 --> 00:29:53.540
Kill the infidels, burn the heretics.

332
00:29:53.540 --> 00:29:57.980
What is new is merely the fact that today it is sold to the public under the label of

333
00:29:57.980 --> 00:30:00.220
science.

334
00:30:00.220 --> 00:30:02.660
7.

335
00:30:02.660 --> 00:30:06.500
THE IDEA OF JUSTICE

336
00:30:06.500 --> 00:30:11.980
One of the motives that impel men to search for an absolute and immutable standard of value

337
00:30:11.980 --> 00:30:16.940
is the presumption that peaceful cooperation is possible only among people guided by the

338
00:30:16.940 --> 00:30:19.180
same judgments of value.

339
00:30:19.180 --> 00:30:24.680
It is obvious that social cooperation would not have evolved and could not be preserved

340
00:30:24.680 --> 00:30:29.580
if the immense majority were not to consider it as the means for the attainment of all

341
00:30:29.580 --> 00:30:31.460
their ends.

342
00:30:31.460 --> 00:30:35.980
Striving after the preservation of his own life and health and after the best possible

343
00:30:35.980 --> 00:30:44.460
removal of felt uneasiness, the individual looks upon society as a means, not as an end.

344
00:30:44.460 --> 00:30:49.060
There is no perfect unanimity even with regard to this point.

345
00:30:49.060 --> 00:30:54.580
But we may neglect the descent of the ascetics and the anchorites, not because they are few,

346
00:30:54.580 --> 00:31:00.340
but because their plans are not affected if other people, in the pursuit of their plans,

347
00:31:00.340 --> 00:31:02.500
cooperate in society.

348
00:31:02.500 --> 00:31:07.140
There prevails among the members of society disagreement with regard to the best method

349
00:31:07.140 --> 00:31:09.260
for its organization.

350
00:31:09.260 --> 00:31:14.020
But this is a descent concerning means, not ultimate ends.

351
00:31:14.020 --> 00:31:19.500
The problems involved can be discussed without any reference to judgments of value.

352
00:31:19.500 --> 00:31:24.100
Of course, almost all people guided by the traditional manner of dealing with ethical

353
00:31:24.100 --> 00:31:29.660
precepts preemptorily repudiate such an explanation of the issue.

354
00:31:29.660 --> 00:31:33.500
Social institutions, they assert, must be just.

355
00:31:33.500 --> 00:31:39.100
It is base to judge them merely according to their fitness to attain definite ends,

356
00:31:39.100 --> 00:31:43.540
however desirable these ends may be from any other point of view.

357
00:31:43.540 --> 00:31:46.940
What Matters First is Justice.

358
00:31:46.940 --> 00:31:54.140
The extreme formulation of this idea is to be found in the famous phrase, fiat justitia,

359
00:31:54.140 --> 00:32:01.800
paraat mundus, let justice be done even if it destroys the world.

360
00:32:01.800 --> 00:32:07.780
Most supporters of the postulate of justice will reject this maxim as extravagant, absurd,

361
00:32:07.780 --> 00:32:09.700
and paradoxical.

362
00:32:09.700 --> 00:32:15.740
But it is not more absurd, merely more shocking, than any other reference to an arbitrary notion

363
00:32:15.740 --> 00:32:17.960
of absolute justice.

364
00:32:17.960 --> 00:32:23.820
It clearly shows the fallacies of the methods applied in the discipline of intuitive ethics.

365
00:32:23.820 --> 00:32:30.140
The procedure of this normative quasi-science is to derive certain precepts from intuition

366
00:32:30.140 --> 00:32:34.980
and to deal with them as if their adoption as a guide to action would not affect the

367
00:32:34.980 --> 00:32:39.140
attainment of any other ends considered desirable.

368
00:32:39.140 --> 00:32:45.200
The moralists do not bother about the necessary consequences of the realization of their postulates.

369
00:32:45.200 --> 00:32:50.080
We need not discuss the attitudes of people for whom the appeal to justice is manifestly

370
00:32:50.080 --> 00:32:56.480
a pretext, consciously or subconsciously chosen, to disguise their short-run interests, nor

371
00:32:56.480 --> 00:33:02.060
expose the hypocrisy of such makeshift notions of justice as those involved in the popular

372
00:33:02.060 --> 00:33:06.000
concepts of just prices and fair wages.

373
00:33:06.000 --> 00:33:11.760
The philosophers, who in their treatises of ethics assigned supreme value to justice and

374
00:33:11.760 --> 00:33:18.280
applied the yardstick of justice to all social institutions, were not guilty of such deceit.

375
00:33:18.280 --> 00:33:24.220
They did not support selfish group concerns by declaring them alone just, fair and good

376
00:33:24.220 --> 00:33:29.660
and smear all dissenters by depicting them as the apologists of unfair causes.

377
00:33:29.660 --> 00:33:35.480
They were Platonists who believed that a perennial idea of absolute justice exists and that it

378
00:33:35.480 --> 00:33:42.120
It is the duty of man to organize all human institutions in conformity with this ideal.

379
00:33:42.120 --> 00:33:48.520
Cognition of justice is imparted to man by an inner voice, that is, by intuition.

380
00:33:48.520 --> 00:33:53.080
The champions of this doctrine did not ask what the consequences of realizing the schemes

381
00:33:53.080 --> 00:33:55.960
they called just would be.

382
00:33:55.960 --> 00:34:02.040
They silently assumed either that these consequences will be beneficial or that mankind is bound

383
00:34:02.040 --> 00:34:06.920
to put up even with very painful consequences of justice.

384
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:11.760
Still less did these teachers of morality pay attention to the fact that people can

385
00:34:11.760 --> 00:34:16.640
and really do disagree with regard to the interpretation of the inner voice and that

386
00:34:16.640 --> 00:34:21.640
no method of peacefully settling such disagreements can be found.

387
00:34:21.640 --> 00:34:26.440
All these ethical doctrines have failed to comprehend that there is, outside of social

388
00:34:26.440 --> 00:34:32.560
Bonds and Proceeding, Temporally or Logically, the Existence of Society, Nothing to Which

389
00:34:32.560 --> 00:34:35.720
the Epithet Just can be Given.

390
00:34:35.720 --> 00:34:41.280
A hypothetical isolated individual must under the pressure of biological competition look

391
00:34:41.280 --> 00:34:45.240
upon all other people as deadly foes.

392
00:34:45.240 --> 00:34:49.880
His only concern is to preserve his own life and health.

393
00:34:49.880 --> 00:34:54.840
He does not need to heed the consequences which his own survival has for other men.

394
00:34:54.840 --> 00:34:58.080
He has no use for justice.

395
00:34:58.080 --> 00:35:02.520
His only solicitudes are hygiene and defense.

396
00:35:02.520 --> 00:35:08.000
But in social cooperation with other men, the individual is forced to abstain from conduct

397
00:35:08.000 --> 00:35:11.660
incompatible with life and society.

398
00:35:11.660 --> 00:35:17.360
Only then does the distinction between what is just and what is unjust emerge.

399
00:35:17.360 --> 00:35:21.860
It invariably refers to inter-human social relations.

400
00:35:21.860 --> 00:35:26.540
What is beneficial to the individual without affecting his fellows, such as the observance

401
00:35:26.540 --> 00:35:31.380
of certain rules in the use of some drugs, remains hygiene.

402
00:35:31.380 --> 00:35:38.940
The ultimate yardstick of justice is conduciveness to the preservation of social cooperation.

403
00:35:38.940 --> 00:35:43.320
Conduct suited to preserve social cooperation is just.

404
00:35:43.320 --> 00:35:48.100
Conduct detrimental to the preservation of society is unjust.

405
00:35:48.100 --> 00:35:52.420
There cannot be any question of organizing society according to the postulates of an

406
00:35:52.420 --> 00:35:56.300
arbitrary preconceived idea of justice.

407
00:35:56.300 --> 00:36:01.820
The problem is to organize society for the best possible realization of those ends which

408
00:36:01.820 --> 00:36:05.780
men want to attain by social cooperation.

409
00:36:05.780 --> 00:36:09.500
Social utility is the only standard of justice.

410
00:36:09.500 --> 00:36:12.220
It is the sole guide of legislation.

411
00:36:12.220 --> 00:36:17.980
Thus, there are no irreconcilable conflicts between selfishness and altruism, between

412
00:36:17.980 --> 00:36:24.900
economics and ethics, between the concerns of the individual and those of society.

413
00:36:24.900 --> 00:36:30.780
Utilitarian philosophy and its finest product, economics, reduced these apparent antagonisms

414
00:36:30.780 --> 00:36:35.620
to the opposition of short-run and long-run interests.

415
00:36:35.620 --> 00:36:40.380
Society could not have come into existence or been preserved without a harmony of the

416
00:36:40.380 --> 00:36:44.180
and the rightly understood interests of all its members.

417
00:36:44.180 --> 00:36:49.340
There is only one way of dealing with all problems of social organization and the conduct

418
00:36:49.340 --> 00:36:56.180
of the members of society, namely, the method applied by praxeology and economics.

419
00:36:56.180 --> 00:37:01.340
No other method can contribute anything to the elucidation of these matters.

420
00:37:01.340 --> 00:37:08.180
The concept of justice as employed by jurisprudence refers to legality, that is, to legitimacy

421
00:37:08.180 --> 00:37:11.780
from the point of view of the valid statutes of a country.

422
00:37:11.780 --> 00:37:14.960
It means justice de lega lata.

423
00:37:14.960 --> 00:37:21.220
The science of law has nothing to say de lega ferenda, that is, about the laws as they ought

424
00:37:21.220 --> 00:37:22.980
to be.

425
00:37:22.980 --> 00:37:29.580
To enact new laws and to repeal old laws is the task of the legislature, whose sole criterion

426
00:37:29.580 --> 00:37:31.820
is social utility.

427
00:37:31.820 --> 00:37:38.140
The assistance the legislator can expect from lawyers refers only to matters of legal technique,

428
00:37:38.140 --> 00:37:54.900
8. THE UTILITARIAN DOCTRINE RESTATED

429
00:37:54.900 --> 00:38:00.140
The essential teachings of utilitarian philosophy as applied to the problems of society can

430
00:38:00.140 --> 00:38:06.680
be restated as follows. Human effort exerted under the principle of the division of labor

431
00:38:06.680 --> 00:38:12.800
and Social Cooperation achieves, other things remaining equal, a greater output per unit

432
00:38:12.800 --> 00:38:17.320
of input than the isolated efforts of solitary individuals.

433
00:38:17.320 --> 00:38:24.160
Man's reason is capable of recognizing this fact and of adapting his conduct accordingly.

434
00:38:24.160 --> 00:38:30.560
Thus, social cooperation becomes for almost every man the great means for the attainment

435
00:38:30.560 --> 00:38:33.000
of all ends.

436
00:38:33.000 --> 00:38:39.720
An eminently human common interest, the preservation and intensification of social bonds, is substituted

437
00:38:39.720 --> 00:38:46.240
for pitiless biological competition, the significant mark of animal and plant life.

438
00:38:46.240 --> 00:38:49.000
Man becomes a social being.

439
00:38:49.000 --> 00:38:54.080
He is no longer forced by the inevitable laws of nature to look upon all other specimens

440
00:38:54.080 --> 00:38:57.820
of his animal species as deadly foes.

441
00:38:57.820 --> 00:39:00.560
Other people become his fellows.

442
00:39:00.560 --> 00:39:05.620
For animals, the generation of every new member of the species means the appearance of a new

443
00:39:05.620 --> 00:39:08.400
rival in the struggle for life.

444
00:39:08.400 --> 00:39:14.460
For man, until the optimum size of population is reached, it means rather an improvement

445
00:39:14.460 --> 00:39:19.120
than a deterioration in his quest for material well-being.

446
00:39:19.120 --> 00:39:25.420
Notwithstanding all his social achievements, man remains in biological structure a mammal.

447
00:39:25.420 --> 00:39:30.700
His most urgent needs are nourishment, warmth, and shelter.

448
00:39:30.700 --> 00:39:35.660
Only when these wants are satisfied can he concern himself with other needs, peculiar

449
00:39:35.660 --> 00:39:40.820
to the human species and therefore called specifically human or higher needs.

450
00:39:40.820 --> 00:39:47.300
Also, the satisfaction of these depends as a rule, at least to some extent, on the availability

451
00:39:47.300 --> 00:39:50.580
of various material tangible things.

452
00:39:50.580 --> 00:39:57.380
As social cooperation is for acting man a means and not an end, no unanimity with regard

453
00:39:57.380 --> 00:40:01.300
to value judgments is required to make it work.

454
00:40:01.300 --> 00:40:07.260
It is a fact that almost all men agree in aiming at certain ends, at those pleasures

455
00:40:07.260 --> 00:40:12.220
which ivory tower moralists disdain as base and shabby.

456
00:40:12.220 --> 00:40:17.420
But it is no less a fact that even the most sublime ends cannot be sought by people who

457
00:40:17.420 --> 00:40:24.660
To have not first satisfied the wants of their animal body, the loftiest exploits of philosophy,

458
00:40:24.660 --> 00:40:31.620
art and literature would never have been performed by men living outside of society.

459
00:40:31.620 --> 00:40:36.180
Moralists praise the nobility of people who seek a thing for its own sake.

460
00:40:36.180 --> 00:40:43.580
Deutsch sein heißt eine Sache um ihre selbst willen tun, declared Richard Wagner, and the

461
00:40:43.580 --> 00:40:50.140
The Nazis, of all people, adopted the dictum as a fundamental principle of their creed.

462
00:40:50.140 --> 00:40:55.180
Now what is sought as an ultimate end is valued according to the immediate satisfaction to

463
00:40:55.180 --> 00:40:57.820
be derived from its attainment.

464
00:40:57.820 --> 00:41:03.380
There is no harm in declaring elliptically that it is sought for its own sake.

465
00:41:03.380 --> 00:41:10.060
Then Wagner's phrase is reduced to the truism, ultimate ends are ends and not means for the

466
00:41:10.060 --> 00:41:14.380
The Attainment of Other Ends

467
00:41:14.380 --> 00:41:20.340
Moralists furthermore level against utilitarianism the charge of ethical materialism.

468
00:41:20.340 --> 00:41:24.260
Here too they misconstrue the utilitarian doctrine.

469
00:41:24.260 --> 00:41:30.460
Its gist is the cognition that action pursues definite chosen ends and that consequently

470
00:41:30.460 --> 00:41:36.020
there can be no other standard for appraising conduct but the desirability or undesirability

471
00:41:36.020 --> 00:41:38.380
of its effects.

472
00:41:38.380 --> 00:41:45.200
The precepts of ethics are designed to preserve, not to destroy, the world.

473
00:41:45.200 --> 00:41:50.780
They may call upon people to put up with undesirable short-run effects in order to avoid producing

474
00:41:50.780 --> 00:41:57.280
still more undesirable long-run effects, but they must never recommend actions whose effects

475
00:41:57.280 --> 00:42:03.700
they themselves deem undesirable for the sole purpose of not defying an arbitrary rule derived

476
00:42:03.700 --> 00:42:05.760
from intuition.

477
00:42:05.760 --> 00:42:14.560
The formula fiat justitia para at mundus is exploded as sheer nonsense. An ethical doctrine

478
00:42:14.560 --> 00:42:21.900
that does not take into full account the effects of action is mere fancy. Utilitarianism does

479
00:42:21.900 --> 00:42:27.340
not teach that people should strive only after sensuous pleasure, though it recognizes that

480
00:42:27.340 --> 00:42:32.820
most or at least many people behave in this way. Neither does it indulge in judgments

481
00:42:32.820 --> 00:42:34.600
of Value.

482
00:42:34.600 --> 00:42:40.180
By its recognition that social cooperation is for the immense majority a means for attaining

483
00:42:40.180 --> 00:42:46.460
all their ends, it dispels the notion that society, the state, the nation, or any other

484
00:42:46.460 --> 00:42:53.700
social entity, is an ultimate end and that individual men are the slaves of that entity.

485
00:42:53.700 --> 00:42:59.720
It rejects the philosophies of universalism, collectivism, and totalitarianism.

486
00:42:59.720 --> 00:43:06.760
In this sense, it is meaningful to call utilitarianism a philosophy of individualism.

487
00:43:06.760 --> 00:43:12.760
The collectivist doctrine fails to recognize that social cooperation is for man a means

488
00:43:12.760 --> 00:43:16.360
for the attainment of all his ends.

489
00:43:16.360 --> 00:43:21.640
It assumes that irreconcilable conflict prevails between the interests of the collective and

490
00:43:21.640 --> 00:43:27.320
those of individuals, and in this conflict it sides unconditionally with the collective

491
00:43:27.320 --> 00:43:29.200
entity.

492
00:43:29.200 --> 00:43:32.760
The collective alone has real existence.

493
00:43:32.760 --> 00:43:37.760
The individual's existence is conditioned by that of the collective.

494
00:43:37.760 --> 00:43:42.660
The collective is perfect and can do no wrong.

495
00:43:42.660 --> 00:43:45.360
Individuals are wretched and refractory.

496
00:43:45.360 --> 00:43:50.880
Their obstinacy must be curbed by the authority to which God or nature has entrusted the conduct

497
00:43:50.880 --> 00:43:53.680
of society's affairs.

498
00:43:53.680 --> 00:43:59.600
The powers that be, says the apostle Paul, are ordained of God.

499
00:43:59.600 --> 00:44:05.440
They are ordained by nature or by the superhuman factor that directs the course of all cosmic

500
00:44:05.440 --> 00:44:09.280
events, say the atheist collectivist.

501
00:44:09.280 --> 00:44:11.880
Two questions immediately arise.

502
00:44:11.880 --> 00:44:16.920
First, if it were true that the interests of the collective and those of individuals

503
00:44:16.920 --> 00:44:22.720
are implacably opposed to one another, how could society function?

504
00:44:22.720 --> 00:44:27.240
One may assume that the individuals would be prevented by force of arms from resorting

505
00:44:27.240 --> 00:44:32.560
to open rebellion, but it cannot be assumed that their active cooperation could be secured

506
00:44:32.560 --> 00:44:34.760
by mere compulsion.

507
00:44:34.760 --> 00:44:41.800
A system of production in which the only incentive to work is the fear of punishment cannot last.

508
00:44:41.800 --> 00:44:47.520
It was this fact that made slavery disappear as a system of managing production.

509
00:44:47.520 --> 00:44:53.360
Second, if the collective is not a means by which individuals may achieve their ends,

510
00:44:53.360 --> 00:44:58.140
if the collective's flowering requires sacrifices by the individuals which are not outweighed

511
00:44:58.140 --> 00:45:04.280
by advantages derived from social cooperation, what prompts the advocate of collectivism

512
00:45:04.280 --> 00:45:09.280
to assign to the concerns of the collective precedents over the personal wishes of the

513
00:45:09.280 --> 00:45:10.600
individuals?

514
00:45:10.600 --> 00:45:15.840
Can any argument be advanced for such exaltation of the collective but personal judgments of

515
00:45:15.840 --> 00:45:17.280
value?

516
00:45:17.280 --> 00:45:23.160
Of course, everybody's judgments of value are personal. If a man assigns a higher value

517
00:45:23.160 --> 00:45:28.520
to the concerns of a collective than to his other concerns and acts accordingly, that

518
00:45:28.520 --> 00:45:35.320
is his affair. So long as the collectivist philosophers proceed in this way, no objection

519
00:45:35.320 --> 00:45:41.480
can be raised, but they argue differently. They elevate their personal judgments of value

520
00:45:41.480 --> 00:45:47.160
to the dignity of an absolute standard of value. They urge other people to stop valuing

521
00:45:47.160 --> 00:45:52.060
Banking according to their own will and to adopt unconditionally the precepts to which

522
00:45:52.060 --> 00:45:56.500
collectivism has assigned absolute eternal validity.

523
00:45:56.500 --> 00:46:01.860
The futility and arbitrariness of the collectivist point of view becomes still more evident when

524
00:46:01.860 --> 00:46:07.260
one recalls that various collectivist parties compete for the exclusive allegiance of the

525
00:46:07.260 --> 00:46:08.940
individuals.

526
00:46:08.940 --> 00:46:14.360
Even if they employ the same word for their collectivist ideal, various writers and leaders

527
00:46:14.360 --> 00:46:19.220
The researchers disagree on the essential features of the thing they have in mind.

528
00:46:19.220 --> 00:46:24.900
The state which Ferdinand LaSalle called God and to which he assigned paramountcy was not

529
00:46:24.900 --> 00:46:31.420
precisely the collectivist idol of Hegel and Stahl, the state of the Hohenzollern.

530
00:46:31.420 --> 00:46:37.980
Is mankind as a whole the sole legitimate collective or is each of the various nations?

531
00:46:37.980 --> 00:46:43.660
Is the collective to which the German-speaking Swiss a exclusive allegiance, the Swiss Confederacy

532
00:46:43.660 --> 00:46:48.420
or the Volksgemeinschaft comprising all German-speaking men?

533
00:46:48.420 --> 00:46:53.380
All major social entities such as nations, linguistic groups, religious communities,

534
00:46:53.380 --> 00:46:58.340
party organizations have been elevated to the dignity of the supreme collective that

535
00:46:58.340 --> 00:47:03.580
overshadows all other collectives and claims the submission of the whole personality of

536
00:47:03.580 --> 00:47:06.380
all right-thinking men.

537
00:47:06.380 --> 00:47:10.900
But an individual can renounce autonomous action and unconditionally surrender his

538
00:47:40.900 --> 00:48:07.820
Collectivism is a doctrine of war, intolerance, and persecution.

539
00:48:07.820 --> 00:48:13.140
If any of the collectivist creeds should succeed in its endeavors, all people but the great

540
00:48:13.140 --> 00:48:17.460
dictator would be deprived of their essential human quality.

541
00:48:17.460 --> 00:48:22.180
They would become mere soulless pawns in the hands of a monster.

542
00:48:22.180 --> 00:48:27.380
The characteristic feature of a free society is that it can function in spite of the fact

543
00:48:27.380 --> 00:48:31.740
that its members disagree in many judgments of value.

544
00:48:31.740 --> 00:48:37.380
In the market economy, business serves not only the majority but also various minorities,

545
00:48:37.380 --> 00:48:57.100
9.

546
00:48:57.100 --> 00:49:00.480
On Aesthetic Values

547
00:49:00.480 --> 00:49:05.780
The quest for absolute standards of value was not limited to the field of ethics.

548
00:49:05.780 --> 00:49:09.180
and concerned aesthetic values as well.

549
00:49:09.180 --> 00:49:14.620
In ethics, a common ground for the choice of rules of conduct is given so far as people

550
00:49:14.620 --> 00:49:19.680
agree in considering the preservation of social cooperation, the foremost means for

551
00:49:19.680 --> 00:49:21.620
attaining all their ends.

552
00:49:21.620 --> 00:49:28.420
Thus, virtually any controversy concerning the rules of conduct refers to means and not

553
00:49:28.420 --> 00:49:30.260
to ends.

554
00:49:30.260 --> 00:49:35.300
It is consequently possible to appraise these rules from the point of view of their adequacy

555
00:49:35.300 --> 00:49:38.500
for the Peaceful Functioning of Society.

556
00:49:38.500 --> 00:49:43.340
Even rigid supporters of an intuitionist ethics could not help eventually resorting to an

557
00:49:43.340 --> 00:49:49.020
appraisal of conduct from the point of view of its effects upon human happiness.

558
00:49:49.020 --> 00:49:52.300
It is different with aesthetic judgments of value.

559
00:49:52.300 --> 00:49:57.220
In this field there is no such agreement as prevails with regard to the insight that social

560
00:49:57.220 --> 00:50:02.660
cooperation is the foremost means for the attainment of all ends.

561
00:50:02.660 --> 00:50:08.500
All disagreement here invariably concerns judgments of value, none the choice of means for the

562
00:50:08.500 --> 00:50:11.460
realization of an end agreed upon.

563
00:50:11.460 --> 00:50:15.060
There is no way to reconcile conflicting judgments.

564
00:50:15.060 --> 00:50:20.780
There is no standard by which a verdict of, it pleases me, or, it does not please me,

565
00:50:20.780 --> 00:50:22.820
can be rectified.

566
00:50:22.820 --> 00:50:28.580
The unfortunate propensity to hypostatize various aspects of human thinking and acting

567
00:50:28.580 --> 00:50:33.540
has led to attempts to provide a definition of beauty and then to apply this arbitrary

568
00:50:33.540 --> 00:50:35.860
concept as a measure.

569
00:50:35.860 --> 00:50:41.860
However, there is no acceptable definition of beauty but that which pleases.

570
00:50:41.860 --> 00:50:46.680
There are no norms of beauty, and there is no such thing as a normative discipline of

571
00:50:46.680 --> 00:50:48.540
aesthetics.

572
00:50:48.540 --> 00:50:52.640
All that a professional critic of art and literature can say apart from historical and

573
00:50:52.640 --> 00:50:57.420
technical observations is that he likes or dislikes a work.

574
00:50:57.420 --> 00:51:03.620
The work may stir him to profound commentaries and disquisitions, but his judgments of value

575
00:51:03.620 --> 00:51:10.140
remain personal and subjective, and do not necessarily affect the judgments of other people.

576
00:51:10.140 --> 00:51:14.940
A discerning person will note with interest what a thoughtful writer says about the impression

577
00:51:14.940 --> 00:51:20.580
a work of art made upon him, but it depends upon a man's own discretion whether or not

578
00:51:20.580 --> 00:51:25.740
he will let his own judgment be influenced by that of other men, however excellent they

579
00:51:25.740 --> 00:51:27.780
They May Be

580
00:51:27.780 --> 00:51:33.380
The enjoyment of art and literature presupposes a certain disposition and susceptibility on

581
00:51:33.380 --> 00:51:39.980
the part of the public. Taste is inborn to only a few. Others must

582
00:51:39.980 --> 00:51:45.380
cultivate their aptitude for enjoyment. There are many things a man must learn and experience

583
00:51:45.380 --> 00:51:51.700
in order to become a connoisseur. But however a man may shine, as a well-informed expert,

584
00:51:51.700 --> 00:51:56.340
His judgments of value remain personal and subjective.

585
00:51:56.340 --> 00:52:01.940
The most eminent critics and, for that matter, also the most noted writers, poets and artists

586
00:52:01.940 --> 00:52:07.060
widely disagreed in their appreciation of the most famous masterpieces.

587
00:52:07.060 --> 00:52:12.180
Only stilted pedants can conceive the idea that there are absolute norms to tell what

588
00:52:12.180 --> 00:52:14.900
is beautiful and what is not.

589
00:52:14.900 --> 00:52:20.200
They try to derive from the works of the past a code of rules with which, as they fancy,

590
00:52:20.200 --> 00:52:25.800
The writers and artists of the future should comply, but the genius does not cooperate

591
00:52:25.800 --> 00:52:28.160
with the pundit.

592
00:52:28.160 --> 00:52:30.160
10.

593
00:52:30.160 --> 00:52:35.720
THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE QUEST FOR ABSOLUTE VALUES

594
00:52:35.720 --> 00:52:40.280
The value controversy is not a scholastic quarrel of interest only to hair-splitting

595
00:52:40.280 --> 00:52:41.780
dons.

596
00:52:41.780 --> 00:52:45.680
It touches upon the vital issues of human life.

597
00:52:45.680 --> 00:52:51.140
The world view that was displaced by modern rationalism did not tolerate dissenting judgments

598
00:52:51.140 --> 00:52:52.840
of value.

599
00:52:52.840 --> 00:52:58.080
The mere fact of dissent was considered an insolent provocation, a mortal outrage to

600
00:52:58.080 --> 00:53:00.080
one's own feelings.

601
00:53:00.080 --> 00:53:03.300
Protracted religious wars resulted.

602
00:53:03.300 --> 00:53:08.280
Although some intolerance, bigotry and lust for persecution is still left in religious

603
00:53:08.280 --> 00:53:14.120
matters, it is unlikely that religious passion will kindle wars in the near future.

604
00:53:14.120 --> 00:53:19.120
The aggressive spirit of our age stems from another source, from endeavors to make the

605
00:53:19.120 --> 00:53:25.260
state totalitarian and to deprive the individual of autonomy.

606
00:53:25.260 --> 00:53:29.960
It is true that the supporters of socialist and interventionist programs recommend them

607
00:53:29.960 --> 00:53:36.080
only as a means to attain ends which they have in common with all other members of society.

608
00:53:36.080 --> 00:53:40.880
They hold that a society organized according to their principles will best supply people

609
00:53:40.880 --> 00:53:45.000
with those material goods they toil to acquire.

610
00:53:45.000 --> 00:53:50.400
What more desirable societal state of affairs can be thought of than that higher phase of

611
00:53:50.400 --> 00:53:57.160
communist society in which, as Marx told us, society will give to each according to his

612
00:53:57.160 --> 00:53:58.160
needs?

613
00:53:58.160 --> 00:54:03.720
However, the socialists failed entirely in attempts to prove their case.

614
00:54:03.720 --> 00:54:08.400
Marx was at a loss to refute the well-founded objections that were raised even in his time

615
00:54:08.400 --> 00:54:13.920
about the minor difficulties of the socialist schemes, it was his helplessness in this

616
00:54:13.920 --> 00:54:19.880
regard that prompted him to develop the three fundamental doctrines of his dogmatism.

617
00:54:19.880 --> 00:54:26.020
When economics later demonstrated why a socialist order, necessarily lacking any method of economic

618
00:54:26.020 --> 00:54:32.040
calculation, could never function as an economic system, all arguments advanced in favor of

619
00:54:32.040 --> 00:54:35.080
the Great Reform, collapsed.

620
00:54:35.080 --> 00:54:40.720
From that time on, socialists no longer based their hopes upon the power of their arguments

621
00:54:40.720 --> 00:54:45.040
but upon the resentment, envy, and hatred of the masses.

622
00:54:45.040 --> 00:54:52.740
Today, even the adepts of scientific socialism rely exclusively upon these emotional factors.

623
00:54:52.740 --> 00:54:59.020
The basis of contemporary socialism and interventionism is judgment of value.

624
00:54:59.020 --> 00:55:04.680
Socialism is praised as the only fair variety of society's economic organization.

625
00:55:04.680 --> 00:55:11.500
All socialists, Marxians as well as non-Marxians, advocate socialism as the only system consonant

626
00:55:11.500 --> 00:55:15.900
with the scale of arbitrarily established absolute values.

627
00:55:15.900 --> 00:55:21.500
These values, they claim, are the only values that are valid for all decent people, foremost

628
00:55:21.500 --> 00:55:26.620
among them the workers, the majority in a modern industrial society.

629
00:55:26.620 --> 00:55:31.820
They are considered absolute because they are supported by the majority, and the majority

630
00:55:31.820 --> 00:55:34.380
is always right.

631
00:55:34.380 --> 00:55:39.080
A rather superficial and shallow view of the problems of government saw the distinction

632
00:55:39.080 --> 00:55:45.660
between freedom and despotism in an outward feature of the system of rule and administration,

633
00:55:45.660 --> 00:55:50.600
namely in the number of people exercising direct control of the social apparatus of

634
00:55:50.600 --> 00:55:53.680
coercion and compulsion.

635
00:55:53.680 --> 00:55:58.520
Such a numerical standard is the basis of Aristotle's famous classification of the various

636
00:55:58.520 --> 00:56:00.460
forms of government.

637
00:56:00.460 --> 00:56:06.100
The concepts of monarchy, oligarchy and democracy still preserve this way of dealing with the

638
00:56:06.100 --> 00:56:12.300
matter. Yet its inadequacy is so obvious that no philosopher could avoid referring to facts

639
00:56:12.300 --> 00:56:17.700
which did not agree with it and therefore were considered paradoxical. There was for

640
00:56:17.700 --> 00:56:23.900
instance the fact already well recognized by Greek authors that tyranny was often or

641
00:56:23.900 --> 00:56:30.120
even regularly supported by the masses and was in this sense popular government. Modern

642
00:56:30.120 --> 00:56:34.880
Modern writers have employed the term Caesarism for this type of government and have continued

643
00:56:34.880 --> 00:56:40.760
to look upon it as an exceptional case conditioned by peculiar circumstances, but they have been

644
00:56:40.760 --> 00:56:45.880
at a loss to explain satisfactorily what made the conditions exceptional.

645
00:56:45.880 --> 00:56:51.960
Yet fascinated by the traditional classification, people acquiesced in this superficial interpretation

646
00:56:51.960 --> 00:56:57.660
as long as it seemed that it had to explain only one case in modern European history,

647
00:56:57.660 --> 00:57:03.820
of the Second French Empire. The final collapse of the Aristotelian doctrine came only when

648
00:57:03.820 --> 00:57:10.860
it had to face the dictatorship of the proletariat and the autocracy of Hitler, Mussolini, Perone

649
00:57:10.860 --> 00:57:17.380
and other modern successors of the Greek tyrants. The way toward a realistic distinction between

650
00:57:17.380 --> 00:57:23.540
freedom and bondage was opened two hundred years ago by David Hume's Immortal Essay

651
00:57:23.540 --> 00:57:30.780
on the First Principles of Government. Government, taught Hume, is always government of the many

652
00:57:30.780 --> 00:57:37.300
by the few. Power is therefore always ultimately on the side of the governed, and the governors

653
00:57:37.300 --> 00:57:44.060
have nothing to support them but opinion. This cognition, logically followed to its

654
00:57:44.060 --> 00:57:50.560
conclusion, completely changed the discussion concerning liberty. The mechanical and arithmetical

655
00:57:50.560 --> 00:58:16.880
The struggle for freedom is ultimately not resistance to autocrats or oligarchs but

656
00:58:16.880 --> 00:58:22.840
Resistance to the Despotism of Public Opinion. It is not the struggle of the many against

657
00:58:22.840 --> 00:58:30.560
the few, but of minorities, sometimes of a minority of but one man, against the majority.

658
00:58:30.560 --> 00:58:37.400
The worst and most dangerous form of absolutist rule is that of an intolerant majority. Such

659
00:58:37.400 --> 00:58:42.440
is the conclusion arrived at by Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill.

660
00:58:42.440 --> 00:58:47.480
In his essay on Bentham, Mill pointed out why this eminent philosopher failed to see

661
00:58:47.480 --> 00:58:53.320
the real issue and why his doctrine found acceptance with some of the noblest spirits.

662
00:58:53.320 --> 00:58:59.840
Bentham, he says, lived, in a time of reaction against the aristocratic governments of modern

663
00:58:59.840 --> 00:59:01.360
Europe.

664
00:59:01.360 --> 00:59:07.480
The reformers of his age have been accustomed to see the numerical majority everywhere unjustly

665
00:59:07.480 --> 00:59:09.480
The Theory of Money and Credit

666
00:59:37.480 --> 00:59:42.480
has not been going on, wherever it has been terminated by the complete victory of one

667
00:59:42.480 --> 00:59:48.480
of the contending principles and no new contest has taken the place of the old, society has

668
00:59:48.480 --> 00:59:55.080
either hardened into Chinese stationeriness or fallen into dissolution.

669
00:59:55.080 --> 01:00:00.800
Much of what was sound in Bentham's political doctrines was slighted by his contemporaries,

670
01:00:00.800 --> 01:00:06.040
was denied by later generations and had little practical influence.

671
01:00:06.040 --> 01:00:12.160
And his failure to distinguish correctly between despotism and liberty was accepted with alt-qualms

672
01:00:12.160 --> 01:00:15.340
by most nineteenth-century writers.

673
01:00:15.340 --> 01:00:22.360
In their eyes, true liberty meant the unbridled despotism of the majority.

674
01:00:22.360 --> 01:00:27.480
Lacking the power to think logically, and ignorant of history as well as of theory,

675
01:00:27.480 --> 01:00:32.240
the much-admired progressive writers gave up the essential idea of the Enlightenment

676
01:00:32.240 --> 01:00:36.500
Kant, Freedom of Thought, Speech and Communication.

677
01:00:36.500 --> 01:00:40.880
Not all of them were so outspoken as Kant and Lenin.

678
01:00:40.880 --> 01:00:46.400
But they all, in declaring that freedom means only the right to say the correct things,

679
01:00:46.400 --> 01:00:51.440
not also the right to say the wrong things, virtually converted the ideas of freedom of

680
01:00:51.440 --> 01:00:55.100
thought and conscience into their opposite.

681
01:00:55.100 --> 01:01:00.500
It was not the syllabus of Pope Pius IX that paved the way for the return of intolerance

682
01:01:00.500 --> 01:01:06.580
Socialists and the Persecution of Dissenters, it was the writings of the socialists.

683
01:01:06.580 --> 01:01:12.180
After a short-lived triumph of the idea of freedom, bondage made a comeback disguised

684
01:01:12.180 --> 01:01:18.000
as a consummation and completion of the philosophy of freedom as the finishing of the unfinished

685
01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:23.440
revolution as the final emancipation of the individual.

686
01:01:23.440 --> 01:01:30.140
The concept of absolute and eternal values is an indispensable element in this totalitarian

687
01:01:30.140 --> 01:01:34.920
A new notion of truth was established.

688
01:01:34.920 --> 01:01:39.300
Truth is what those in power declare to be true.

689
01:01:39.300 --> 01:01:45.460
The dissenting minority is undemocratic because it refuses to accept as true the opinion of

690
01:01:45.460 --> 01:01:47.260
the majority.

691
01:01:47.260 --> 01:01:54.260
All means to liquidate such rebellious scoundrels are democratic and therefore morally good.
