WEBVTT

NOTE 9. The Concept of Historical Individuality

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.600
Part 3 Epistemological Problems of History Chapter 9

2
00:00:08.600 --> 00:00:14.520
THE CONCEPT OF HISTORICAL INDIVIDUALITY 1

3
00:00:14.520 --> 00:00:20.960
THE ULTIMATE GIVEN OF HISTORY The human search for knowledge cannot go on

4
00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:21.960
endlessly.

5
00:00:21.960 --> 00:00:27.640
Inevitably, sooner or later it will reach a point beyond which it cannot proceed.

6
00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:32.600
will then be faced with an ultimate given, a datum that man's reason cannot trace back

7
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:34.960
to other data.

8
00:00:34.960 --> 00:00:39.600
In the course of the evolution of knowledge, science has succeeded in tracing back to other

9
00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:45.060
data some things and events which previously had been viewed as ultimate.

10
00:00:45.060 --> 00:00:50.400
We may expect that this will also occur in the future, but there will always remain something

11
00:00:50.400 --> 00:00:57.520
that is for the human mind an ultimate given, unanalyzable and irreducible.

12
00:00:57.520 --> 00:01:01.640
and Reason cannot even conceive a kind of knowledge that would not encounter such an

13
00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:08.480
insurmountable obstacle. There is for man no such thing as omniscience.

14
00:01:08.480 --> 00:01:13.960
In dealing with such ultimate data, history refers to individuality. The characteristics

15
00:01:13.960 --> 00:01:18.960
of individual men, their ideas and judgments of value as well as the actions guided by

16
00:01:18.960 --> 00:01:23.960
those ideas and judgments, cannot be traced back to something of which they would be the

17
00:01:23.960 --> 00:01:28.280
Derivatives There is no answer to the question why Frederick

18
00:01:28.280 --> 00:01:34.120
II invaded Silesia except, because he was Frederick II.

19
00:01:34.120 --> 00:01:39.360
It is customary, although not very expedient, to call the mental process, by means of which

20
00:01:39.360 --> 00:01:43.800
a datum is traced back to other data, rational.

21
00:01:43.800 --> 00:01:47.480
Then an ultimate datum is called irrational.

22
00:01:47.480 --> 00:01:52.440
No historical research can be thought of that would not ultimately meet such irrational

23
00:01:52.440 --> 00:01:54.180
Thoughts.

24
00:01:54.180 --> 00:01:59.360
Philosophies of history claim to avoid referring to individuality and irrationality.

25
00:01:59.360 --> 00:02:04.480
They pretend to provide a thoroughgoing interpretation of all historical events.

26
00:02:04.480 --> 00:02:09.580
What they really do is relegate the ultimate given to two points of their scheme, to its

27
00:02:09.580 --> 00:02:13.520
supposed beginning and its supposed end.

28
00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:19.640
They assume that there is at the start of history an unanalyzable and irreducible agency,

29
00:02:19.640 --> 00:02:24.360
For example, Geist in the system of Hegel, or the material productive forces in that

30
00:02:24.360 --> 00:02:25.960
of Marx.

31
00:02:25.960 --> 00:02:32.200
And they further assume that this prime mover of history aims at a definite end, also unanalyzable

32
00:02:32.200 --> 00:02:39.640
and irreducible, for instance, the Prussian state of about 1825, or socialism.

33
00:02:39.640 --> 00:02:44.480
Whatever one may think about the various systems of philosophy of history, it is obvious that

34
00:02:44.480 --> 00:02:49.000
they do not eliminate reference to individuality and irrationality.

35
00:02:49.000 --> 00:02:53.640
They merely shift it to another point of their interpretation.

36
00:02:53.640 --> 00:02:57.240
Materialism wants to throw history overboard entirely.

37
00:02:57.240 --> 00:03:03.200
All ideas and actions should be explained as the necessary outcome of definite physiological

38
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:04.560
processes.

39
00:03:04.560 --> 00:03:09.780
But this would not make it possible to reject any reference to irrationality.

40
00:03:09.780 --> 00:03:16.120
Like history, the natural sciences are ultimately faced with some data defying any further reduction

41
00:03:16.120 --> 00:03:23.720
2.

42
00:03:23.720 --> 00:03:27.880
THE ROLE OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN HISTORY

43
00:03:27.880 --> 00:03:32.280
In the context of a philosophy of history there is no room left for any reference to

44
00:03:32.280 --> 00:03:37.840
individuality other than that of the prime mover and his plan determining the way events

45
00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:39.800
must go.

46
00:03:39.800 --> 00:03:45.440
All individual men are merely tools in the hand of ineluctable destiny.

47
00:03:45.440 --> 00:03:50.720
Whatever they may do, the outcome of their actions must necessarily fit into the preordained

48
00:03:50.720 --> 00:03:53.200
plan of providence.

49
00:03:53.200 --> 00:03:59.240
What would have happened if Lieutenant Napoleon Bonaparte had been killed in action at Toulon?

50
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:01.600
Friedrich Engels knew the answer.

51
00:04:01.600 --> 00:04:03.640
Another would have filled the place.

52
00:04:03.640 --> 00:04:09.520
For the man has always been found as soon as he became necessary.

53
00:04:09.520 --> 00:04:12.880
Necessary for whom and for what purpose?

54
00:04:12.880 --> 00:04:18.440
for the Material Productive Forces to bring about, at a later date, socialism.

55
00:04:18.440 --> 00:04:23.440
It seems that the material productive forces always have a substitute at hand, just as

56
00:04:23.440 --> 00:04:28.280
a cautious opera manager has an understudy ready to sing the tenor's part in case the

57
00:04:28.280 --> 00:04:30.640
star should catch a cold.

58
00:04:30.640 --> 00:04:36.280
If Shakespeare had died in infancy, another man would have written Hamlet and the sonnets.

59
00:04:36.280 --> 00:04:41.640
But some people ask, how did this surrogate while away his time since Shakespeare's good

60
00:04:41.640 --> 00:04:44.480
Health relieved him from this chore.

61
00:04:44.480 --> 00:04:49.140
The issue has been purposely obfuscated by the champions of historical necessity who

62
00:04:49.140 --> 00:04:52.540
confused it with other problems.

63
00:04:52.540 --> 00:04:57.660
Looking backward upon the past, the historian must say that, all conditions having been

64
00:04:57.660 --> 00:05:02.260
as they were, everything that happened was inevitable.

65
00:05:02.260 --> 00:05:07.700
At any instant the state of affairs was the necessary consequence of the immediately preceding

66
00:05:07.700 --> 00:05:13.780
But, among the elements determining any given state of historical affairs, there are factors

67
00:05:13.780 --> 00:05:18.180
that cannot be traced back further than to the point at which the historian is faced

68
00:05:18.180 --> 00:05:22.220
with the ideas and actions of individuals.

69
00:05:22.220 --> 00:05:27.400
When the historian says that the French Revolution of 1789 would not have happened if some things

70
00:05:27.400 --> 00:05:31.920
had been different, he is merely trying to establish the forces that brought about the

71
00:05:31.920 --> 00:05:36.020
event and the influence of each of these forces.

72
00:05:36.020 --> 00:05:40.780
Lenin did not indulge in idle speculations as to what would have happened if the doctrines

73
00:05:40.780 --> 00:05:47.880
that he called l'esprit revolutionnaire and l'esprit classique had not been developed.

74
00:05:47.880 --> 00:05:52.880
He wanted to assign to each of them its relevance in the chain of events that resulted in the

75
00:05:52.880 --> 00:05:56.220
outbreak and the course of the revolution.

76
00:05:56.220 --> 00:06:02.420
A second confusion concerns the limits drawn upon the influence of great men.

77
00:06:02.420 --> 00:06:07.960
Accounts of History, adapted to the capacity of people slow of comprehension, have presented

78
00:06:07.960 --> 00:06:11.600
history as a product of the feats of great men.

79
00:06:11.600 --> 00:06:17.520
The older Hohenzollern made Prussia, Bismarck made the Second Reich, William the Second

80
00:06:17.520 --> 00:06:21.980
ruined it, Hitler made and ruined the Third Reich.

81
00:06:21.980 --> 00:06:26.020
No serious historian ever shared in such nonsense.

82
00:06:26.020 --> 00:06:31.060
It has never been contested that the part played even by the greatest figures of history

83
00:06:31.060 --> 00:06:33.780
was much more moderate.

84
00:06:33.780 --> 00:06:39.860
Every man, whether great or small, lives and acts within the frame of his age's historical

85
00:06:39.860 --> 00:06:41.220
circumstances.

86
00:06:41.220 --> 00:06:46.160
These circumstances are determined by all the ideas and events of the preceding ages

87
00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:49.780
as well as by those of his own age.

88
00:06:49.780 --> 00:06:53.460
The titan may outweigh each of his contemporaries.

89
00:06:53.460 --> 00:06:57.740
He is no match for the united forces of the dwarves.

90
00:06:57.740 --> 00:07:03.380
A statesman can succeed only insofar as his plans are adjusted to the climate of opinion

91
00:07:03.380 --> 00:07:09.420
of his time, that is, to the ideas that have got hold of his fellows' minds.

92
00:07:09.420 --> 00:07:14.620
He can become a leader only if he is prepared to guide people along the paths they want

93
00:07:14.620 --> 00:07:18.780
to walk and toward the goal they want to attain.

94
00:07:18.780 --> 00:07:24.200
A statesman who antagonizes public opinion is doomed to failure.

95
00:07:24.200 --> 00:07:29.280
No matter whether he is an autocrat or an officer of a democracy, the politician must

96
00:07:29.280 --> 00:07:34.760
give the people what they wish to get, very much as a businessman must supply the customers

97
00:07:34.760 --> 00:07:36.720
with the things they wish to acquire.

98
00:07:36.720 --> 00:07:43.420
It is different with the pioneers of new ways of thinking and new modes of art and literature.

99
00:07:43.420 --> 00:07:48.040
The path-breaker who disdains the applause he may get from the crowd of his contemporaries

100
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:51.560
does not depend on his own age's ideas.

101
00:07:51.560 --> 00:07:58.840
He is free to say, with Shiller's Marquis Posa, This century is not ripe for my ideas.

102
00:07:58.840 --> 00:08:02.840
I live as a citizen of centuries to come.

103
00:08:02.840 --> 00:08:08.000
The genius's work, too, is embedded in the sequence of historical events, is conditioned

104
00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:13.280
by the achievements of preceding generations, and is merely a chapter in the evolution of

105
00:08:13.280 --> 00:08:14.560
ideas.

106
00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:20.240
But it adds something new and unheard of to the treasure of thoughts and may in this sense

107
00:08:20.240 --> 00:08:22.800
be called Creative.

108
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:26.320
The genuine history of mankind is the history of ideas.

109
00:08:26.320 --> 00:08:31.160
It is ideas that distinguish man from all other beings.

110
00:08:31.160 --> 00:08:37.160
Ideas engender social institutions, political changes, technological methods of production,

111
00:08:37.160 --> 00:08:40.800
and all that is called economic conditions.

112
00:08:40.800 --> 00:08:46.460
And in searching for their origin, we inevitably come to a point at which all that can be asserted

113
00:08:46.460 --> 00:08:49.200
is that a man had an idea.

114
00:08:49.200 --> 00:08:54.480
Whether the name of this man is known or not is of secondary importance.

115
00:08:54.480 --> 00:09:00.040
This is the meaning that history attaches to the notion of individuality.

116
00:09:00.040 --> 00:09:03.680
Ideas are the ultimate given of historical inquiry.

117
00:09:03.680 --> 00:09:08.200
All that can be said about ideas is that they came to pass.

118
00:09:08.200 --> 00:09:13.120
The historian may point out how a new idea fitted into the ideas developed by earlier

119
00:09:13.120 --> 00:09:18.720
generations and how it may be considered a continuation of these ideas and their logical

120
00:09:18.720 --> 00:09:20.320
Equal.

121
00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:24.620
New ideas do not originate in an ideological vacuum.

122
00:09:24.620 --> 00:09:29.320
They are called forth by the previously existing ideological structure.

123
00:09:29.320 --> 00:09:35.600
They are the response offered by a man's mind to the ideas developed by his predecessors.

124
00:09:35.600 --> 00:09:41.160
But it is an arbitrary surmise to assume that they were bound to come and that if A had

125
00:09:41.160 --> 00:09:47.100
not generated them, a certain B or C would have performed the job.

126
00:09:47.100 --> 00:09:52.400
In this sense, what the limitations of our knowledge induce us to call chance plays a

127
00:09:52.400 --> 00:09:54.480
part in history.

128
00:09:54.480 --> 00:10:00.020
If Aristotle had died in childhood, intellectual history would have been affected.

129
00:10:00.020 --> 00:10:06.600
If Bismarck had died in 1860, world affairs would have taken a different course.

130
00:10:06.600 --> 00:10:12.300
To what extent and with what consequences, nobody can know.

131
00:10:12.300 --> 00:10:14.860
3.

132
00:10:14.860 --> 00:10:19.020
The Chimera of the Group Mind

133
00:10:19.020 --> 00:10:23.420
In their eagerness to eliminate from history any reference to individuals and individual

134
00:10:23.420 --> 00:10:29.760
events, collectivist authors resorted to a chimerical construction, the group mind or

135
00:10:29.760 --> 00:10:32.220
social mind.

136
00:10:32.220 --> 00:10:37.620
At the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth centuries, German philologists

137
00:10:37.620 --> 00:10:43.700
began to study German medieval poetry, which had long since fallen into oblivion. Most

138
00:10:43.700 --> 00:10:49.640
of the epics they edited from old manuscripts were imitations of French works. The names

139
00:10:49.640 --> 00:10:55.600
of their authors, most of them knightly warriors in the service of dukes or counts, were known.

140
00:10:55.600 --> 00:11:01.060
These epics were not much to boast of. But there were two epics of a quite different

141
00:11:01.060 --> 00:11:06.640
character, genuinely original works of high literary value, far surpassing the conventional

142
00:11:06.640 --> 00:11:12.540
Professional Products of the Cordiers, the Nibelungenlied and the Gudrun.

143
00:11:12.540 --> 00:11:17.220
The former is one of the great books of world literature and undoubtedly the outstanding

144
00:11:17.220 --> 00:11:21.980
poem Germany produced before the days of Goethe and Schiller.

145
00:11:21.980 --> 00:11:27.300
The names of the authors of these masterpieces were not handed down to posterity.

146
00:11:27.300 --> 00:11:31.440
Perhaps the poets belonged to the class of professional entertainers who not only were

147
00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:36.480
snubbed by the nobility but had to endure mortifying legal disabilities.

148
00:11:36.480 --> 00:11:41.200
Perhaps they were heretical or Jewish and the clergy was eager to make people forget

149
00:11:41.200 --> 00:11:42.200
them.

150
00:11:42.200 --> 00:11:49.160
At any rate, the philologists called these two works, People's Epics or Volkssapen.

151
00:11:49.160 --> 00:11:54.000
This term suggested to naive minds the idea that they were written not by the individual

152
00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:56.960
authors but by the people.

153
00:11:56.960 --> 00:12:02.100
The same mythical authorship was attributed to popular songs called Volksleaders whose

154
00:12:02.100 --> 00:12:04.800
authors were unknown.

155
00:12:04.800 --> 00:12:09.480
Then in Germany, in the years following the Napoleonic Wars, the problem of comprehensive

156
00:12:09.480 --> 00:12:13.320
legislative codification was brought up for discussion.

157
00:12:13.320 --> 00:12:18.920
In this controversy, the historical school of jurisprudence, led by Sevigny, denied the

158
00:12:18.920 --> 00:12:23.860
competence of any age and any persons to write legislation.

159
00:12:23.860 --> 00:12:30.080
Like the Volksapien and the Volksleader, the nation's laws, they declared, are a spontaneous

160
00:12:30.080 --> 00:12:36.760
Emanation of the Volksgeist, the nation's spirit and peculiar character.

161
00:12:36.760 --> 00:12:40.400
Genuine laws are not arbitrarily written by legislators.

162
00:12:40.400 --> 00:12:44.800
They spring up and thrive organically from the Volksgeist.

163
00:12:44.800 --> 00:12:50.500
This Volksgeist doctrine was devised in Germany as a conscious reaction against the ideas

164
00:12:50.500 --> 00:12:55.760
of natural law and the un-German spirit of the French Revolution.

165
00:12:55.760 --> 00:12:59.760
But it was further developed and elevated to the dignity of a comprehensive social

166
00:12:59.760 --> 00:13:04.640
Doctrine by the French positivists, many of whom not only were committed to the principles

167
00:13:04.640 --> 00:13:09.700
of the most radical among the revolutionary leaders but aimed at completing the unfinished

168
00:13:09.700 --> 00:13:14.840
revolution by a violent overthrow of the capitalistic mode of production.

169
00:13:14.840 --> 00:13:20.240
Emile Durkheim and his school deal with the group mind as if it were a real phenomenon,

170
00:13:20.240 --> 00:13:24.100
a distinct agency, thinking and acting.

171
00:13:24.100 --> 00:13:29.340
As they see it, not individuals but the group is the subject of history.

172
00:13:29.340 --> 00:13:34.340
As a corrective of these fancies, the truism must be stressed that only individuals think

173
00:13:34.340 --> 00:13:35.800
and act.

174
00:13:35.800 --> 00:13:39.960
In dealing with the thoughts and actions of individuals, the historian establishes the

175
00:13:39.960 --> 00:13:45.160
fact that some individuals influence one another in their thinking and acting more strongly

176
00:13:45.160 --> 00:13:49.240
than they influence and are influenced by other individuals.

177
00:13:49.240 --> 00:13:53.900
He observes that cooperation and division of labor exist among some while existing to

178
00:13:53.900 --> 00:13:57.280
a lesser extent or not at all among others.

179
00:13:57.280 --> 00:14:02.600
He employs the term group to signify an aggregation of individuals who cooperate together more

180
00:14:02.600 --> 00:14:03.600
closely.

181
00:14:03.600 --> 00:14:07.440
However, the distinction of groups is optional.

182
00:14:07.440 --> 00:14:12.060
The group is not an ontological entity like the biological species.

183
00:14:12.060 --> 00:14:15.720
The various group concepts intersect one another.

184
00:14:15.720 --> 00:14:20.940
The historian chooses, according to the special plan of his studies, the features and attributes

185
00:14:20.940 --> 00:14:25.020
that determine the classification of individuals into various groups.

186
00:14:25.020 --> 00:14:29.660
The grouping may integrate people speaking the same language or professing the same religion

187
00:14:29.660 --> 00:14:35.420
or practicing the same vocation or occupation or descended from the same ancestry.

188
00:14:35.420 --> 00:14:39.880
The group concept of Gobineau was different from that of Marx.

189
00:14:39.880 --> 00:14:45.780
In short, the group concept is an ideal type and as such is derived from the historian's

190
00:14:45.780 --> 00:14:50.100
understanding of the historical forces and events.

191
00:14:50.100 --> 00:14:52.640
Only individuals think and act.

192
00:14:52.640 --> 00:14:58.100
Each individual's thinking and acting is influenced by his fellow's thinking and acting.

193
00:14:58.100 --> 00:15:00.740
These influences are variegated.

194
00:15:00.740 --> 00:15:05.720
The individual American thoughts and conduct cannot be interpreted if one assigns him to

195
00:15:05.720 --> 00:15:07.460
a single group.

196
00:15:07.460 --> 00:15:12.320
He is not only an American, but a member of a definite religious group or an agnostic

197
00:15:12.320 --> 00:15:13.940
or an atheist.

198
00:15:13.940 --> 00:15:18.960
He has a job, he belongs to a political party, he is affected by traditions inherited from

199
00:15:18.960 --> 00:15:23.800
from his ancestors and conveyed to him by his upbringing, by the family, the school,

200
00:15:23.800 --> 00:15:29.000
the neighborhood, by the ideas prevailing in his town, state and country.

201
00:15:29.000 --> 00:15:33.880
It is an enormous simplification to speak of the American mind.

202
00:15:33.880 --> 00:15:36.640
Every American has his own mind.

203
00:15:36.640 --> 00:15:42.200
It is absurd to ascribe any achievements and virtues or any misdeeds and vices of individual

204
00:15:42.200 --> 00:15:45.840
Americans to America as such.

205
00:15:45.840 --> 00:15:51.800
Most people are common men. They do not have thoughts of their own. They are only receptive.

206
00:15:51.800 --> 00:15:56.440
They do not create new ideas. They repeat what they have heard and imitate what they

207
00:15:56.440 --> 00:16:02.320
have seen. If the world were peopled only by such as these, there would not be any change

208
00:16:02.320 --> 00:16:09.600
and any history. What produces change is new ideas and actions guided by them. What distinguishes

209
00:16:09.600 --> 00:16:14.360
As one group from another is the effect of such innovations.

210
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:17.660
These innovations are not accomplished by a group mind.

211
00:16:17.660 --> 00:16:20.740
They are always the achievements of individuals.

212
00:16:20.740 --> 00:16:24.000
What makes the American people different from any other people is the

213
00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:30.660
joint effect produced by the thoughts and actions of innumerable, uncommon Americans.

214
00:16:30.660 --> 00:16:35.700
We know the names of the men who invented and step-by-step perfected the motor car.

215
00:16:35.700 --> 00:16:40.720
A historian can write a detailed history of the evolution of the automobile.

216
00:16:40.720 --> 00:16:45.460
We do not know the names of the men who, in the beginnings of civilization, made the greatest

217
00:16:45.460 --> 00:16:49.220
inventions, for example, lighting a fire.

218
00:16:49.220 --> 00:16:54.820
But this ignorance does not permit us to ascribe this fundamental invention to a group mind.

219
00:16:54.820 --> 00:17:00.100
It is always an individual who starts a new method of doing things, and then other people

220
00:17:00.100 --> 00:17:03.020
imitate his example.

221
00:17:03.020 --> 00:17:07.100
Individuals and fashions have always been inaugurated by individuals and spread through

222
00:17:07.100 --> 00:17:09.940
imitation by other people.

223
00:17:09.940 --> 00:17:15.140
While the group mind school tried to eliminate the individual by ascribing activity to the

224
00:17:15.140 --> 00:17:20.820
mythical Volksgeist, the Marxians were intent on the one hand upon depreciating the individual's

225
00:17:20.820 --> 00:17:26.260
contribution and on the other hand upon crediting innovations to common men.

226
00:17:26.260 --> 00:17:31.220
Thus, Marx observed that a critical history of technology would demonstrate that none

227
00:17:31.220 --> 00:17:37.060
One of the eighteenth century's inventions was the achievement of a single individual.

228
00:17:37.060 --> 00:17:39.080
What does this prove?

229
00:17:39.080 --> 00:17:44.220
Nobody denies that technological progress is a gradual process, a chain of successive

230
00:17:44.220 --> 00:17:49.460
steps performed by long lines of men, each of whom adds something to the accomplishments

231
00:17:49.460 --> 00:17:51.460
of his predecessors.

232
00:17:51.460 --> 00:17:57.580
The history of every technological contrivance, when completely told, leads back to the most

233
00:17:57.580 --> 00:18:03.940
and Primitive Inventions Made by Cave Dwellers in the Earliest Ages of Mankind.

234
00:18:03.940 --> 00:18:09.760
To choose any later starting point is an arbitrary restriction of the whole tale.

235
00:18:09.760 --> 00:18:14.860
One may begin a history of wireless telegraphy with Maxwell and Hertz, but one may as well

236
00:18:14.860 --> 00:18:19.840
go back to the first experiments with electricity or to any previous technological feats that

237
00:18:19.840 --> 00:18:24.100
had necessarily to precede the construction of a radio network.

238
00:18:24.100 --> 00:18:28.840
All this does not in the least affect the truth that each step forward was made by an

239
00:18:28.840 --> 00:18:33.520
individual and not by some mythical impersonal agency.

240
00:18:33.520 --> 00:18:38.660
It does not detract from the contributions of Maxwell, Hertz and Marconi to admit that

241
00:18:38.660 --> 00:18:44.060
they could be made only because others had previously made other contributions.

242
00:18:44.060 --> 00:18:48.680
To illustrate the difference between the innovator and the dull crowd of routinists who cannot

243
00:18:48.680 --> 00:18:53.780
even imagine that any improvement is possible, we need only refer to a passage in Engel's

244
00:18:53.780 --> 00:19:00.100
Angles Most Famous Book Here, in 1878, Angles apodictically announced

245
00:19:00.100 --> 00:19:05.820
that military weapons are now so perfected that no further progress of any revolutionizing

246
00:19:05.820 --> 00:19:09.340
influence is any longer possible.

247
00:19:09.340 --> 00:19:16.380
Henceforth, all further technological progress is by and large indifferent for land warfare.

248
00:19:16.380 --> 00:19:21.660
The age of evolution is in this regard essentially closed.

249
00:19:21.660 --> 00:19:27.060
This complacent conclusion shows in what the achievement of the innovator consists.

250
00:19:27.060 --> 00:19:32.060
He accomplishes what other people believe to be unthinkable and unfeasible.

251
00:19:32.060 --> 00:19:37.660
Engels, who considered himself an expert in the art of warfare, liked to exemplify his

252
00:19:37.660 --> 00:19:41.400
doctrines by referring to strategy and tactics.

253
00:19:41.400 --> 00:19:47.100
Changes in military tactics, he declared, are not brought about by ingenious army leaders.

254
00:19:47.100 --> 00:19:52.320
They are achievements of privates who are usually cleverer than their officers.

255
00:19:52.320 --> 00:19:57.380
The privates invent them by dint of their instincts and put them into operation in spite

256
00:19:57.380 --> 00:20:00.820
of the reluctance of their commanders.

257
00:20:00.820 --> 00:20:07.380
Every doctrine denying to the single paltry individual any role in history must finally

258
00:20:07.380 --> 00:20:12.140
ascribe changes and improvements to the operation of instincts.

259
00:20:12.140 --> 00:20:17.580
As those upholding such doctrines see it, man is an animal that has the instinct to

260
00:20:17.580 --> 00:20:22.700
produce poems, cathedrals, and airplanes.

261
00:20:22.700 --> 00:20:27.740
Civilization is the result of an unconscious and unpremeditated reaction of man to external

262
00:20:27.740 --> 00:20:29.180
stimuli.

263
00:20:29.180 --> 00:20:34.420
Each achievement is the automatic creation of an instinct with which man has been endowed

264
00:20:34.420 --> 00:20:36.940
especially for this purpose.

265
00:20:36.940 --> 00:20:40.620
There are as many instincts as there are human achievements.

266
00:20:40.620 --> 00:20:45.420
It is needless to enter into a critical examination of this fable invented by impotent people

267
00:20:45.420 --> 00:20:51.340
for sliding the achievements of better men and appealing to the resentment of the dull.

268
00:20:51.340 --> 00:20:55.980
Even on the basis of this makeshift doctrine one cannot negate the distinction between

269
00:20:55.980 --> 00:21:01.580
the man who had the instinct to write the book on the origin of species and those who

270
00:21:01.580 --> 00:21:04.540
lacked this instinct.

271
00:21:04.540 --> 00:21:06.780
4.

272
00:21:06.780 --> 00:21:10.100
PLANNING HISTORY

273
00:21:10.100 --> 00:21:16.000
Individuals act in order to bring about definite results. Whether they succeed or not depends

274
00:21:16.000 --> 00:21:20.180
on the suitability of the means applied and the response their actions encounter on the

275
00:21:20.180 --> 00:21:25.640
part of fellow individuals. Very often the outcome of an action differs considerably

276
00:21:25.640 --> 00:21:31.680
from what the actor was eager to achieve. The margin within which a man, however great,

277
00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:38.620
can act successfully is narrow. No man can through his actions direct the course of affairs

278
00:21:38.620 --> 00:21:43.620
for more than a comparatively short period of the future, still less for all time to

279
00:21:43.620 --> 00:21:50.820
come. Yet every action adds something to history, affects the course of future events, and is

280
00:21:50.820 --> 00:21:57.140
in this sense a historical fact. The most trivial performance of daily routine by dull

281
00:21:57.140 --> 00:22:04.740
people is no less a historical datum than is the most startling innovation of the genius.

282
00:22:04.740 --> 00:22:09.780
The aggregate of the unvarying repetition of traditional modes of acting determines,

283
00:22:09.780 --> 00:22:14.220
as habits, customs and mores, the course of events.

284
00:22:14.220 --> 00:22:19.340
The common man's historical role consists in contributing a particle to the structure

285
00:22:19.340 --> 00:22:22.620
of the tremendous power of consuitude.

286
00:22:22.620 --> 00:22:25.500
History is made by men.

287
00:22:25.500 --> 00:22:31.700
The conscious intentional action of individuals, great and small, determine the course of events

288
00:22:31.700 --> 00:22:36.660
is in so far as it is the result of the interaction of all men.

289
00:22:36.660 --> 00:22:40.640
But the historical process is not designed by individuals.

290
00:22:40.640 --> 00:22:46.220
It is the composite outcome of the intentional actions of all individuals.

291
00:22:46.220 --> 00:22:49.260
No man can plan history.

292
00:22:49.260 --> 00:22:54.780
All he can plan and try to put into effect is his own actions which, jointly with the

293
00:22:54.780 --> 00:22:59.900
actions of other men, constitute the historical process.

294
00:22:59.900 --> 00:23:04.760
The Pilgrim Fathers did not plan to found the United States.

295
00:23:04.760 --> 00:23:08.620
Of course, there have always been men who planned for eternity.

296
00:23:08.620 --> 00:23:14.180
For the most part, the failure of their designs appeared very soon.

297
00:23:14.180 --> 00:23:18.320
Sometimes their constructions lasted quite a while, but their effect was not what the

298
00:23:18.320 --> 00:23:20.480
builders had planned.

299
00:23:20.480 --> 00:23:25.580
The monumental tombs of the Egyptian kings still exist, but it was not the intention

300
00:23:25.580 --> 00:23:31.040
of Their Builders to Make Modern Egypt Attractive for Tourists and to Supply Present-day Museums

301
00:23:31.040 --> 00:23:38.060
with Mummies. Nothing demonstrates more emphatically the temporal limitations on human planning

302
00:23:38.060 --> 00:23:44.020
than the venerable ruins scattered about the surface of the earth. Ideas live longer than

303
00:23:44.020 --> 00:23:50.540
walls and other material artifacts. We still enjoy the masterpieces of the poetry and philosophy

304
00:23:50.540 --> 00:23:57.300
of Ancient India and Greece, but they do not mean for us what they meant to their authors.

305
00:23:57.300 --> 00:24:02.120
We may wonder whether Plato and Aristotle would have approved of the use later ages

306
00:24:02.120 --> 00:24:04.780
have made of their thoughts.

307
00:24:04.780 --> 00:24:10.260
Planning for eternity, to substitute an everlasting state of stability, rigidity and changelessness

308
00:24:10.260 --> 00:24:15.920
for historical evolution, is the theme of a special class of literature.

309
00:24:15.920 --> 00:24:21.720
The Utopian author wants to arrange future conditions according to his own ideas and

310
00:24:21.720 --> 00:24:28.960
to deprive the rest of mankind, once and for all, of the faculty to choose and to act.

311
00:24:28.960 --> 00:24:36.180
One plan alone, namely the author's plan, should be executed and all other people silenced.

312
00:24:36.180 --> 00:24:41.460
The author, and after his death his successor, will henceforth alone determine the course

313
00:24:41.460 --> 00:24:43.040
of events.

314
00:24:43.040 --> 00:24:47.840
There will no longer be any history, as history is the composite effect of the interaction

315
00:24:47.840 --> 00:24:49.560
of all men.

316
00:24:49.560 --> 00:24:55.400
The superhuman dictator will rule the universe and reduce all other people to pawns in his

317
00:24:55.400 --> 00:24:56.520
plans.

318
00:24:56.520 --> 00:25:01.560
He will deal with them as the engineer deals with the raw materials out of which he builds,

319
00:25:01.560 --> 00:25:05.880
a method pertinently called social engineering.

320
00:25:05.880 --> 00:25:08.920
Such projects are very popular nowadays.

321
00:25:08.920 --> 00:25:11.240
They enrapture the intellectuals.

322
00:25:11.240 --> 00:25:16.880
A few skeptics observe that their execution is contrary to human nature, but their supporters

323
00:25:16.880 --> 00:25:22.780
are confident that by suppressing all dissenters they can alter human nature. Then, people

324
00:25:22.780 --> 00:25:27.120
will be as happy as the ants are supposed to be in their hills.

325
00:25:27.120 --> 00:25:33.420
The essential question is, will all men be prepared to yield to the dictator? Will nobody

326
00:25:33.420 --> 00:25:38.820
have the ambition to contest his supremacy? Will nobody develop ideas at variance with

327
00:25:38.820 --> 00:25:43.980
For those underlying the dictator's plan, will all men, after thousands of years of

328
00:25:43.980 --> 00:25:51.260
anarchy in thinking and acting, tacitly submit to the tyranny of one or a few despots?

329
00:25:51.260 --> 00:25:56.140
It is possible that in a few years all nations will have adopted the system of all-around

330
00:25:56.140 --> 00:25:59.740
planning and totalitarian regimentation.

331
00:25:59.740 --> 00:26:06.460
The number of opponents is very small, and their direct political influence almost nil.

332
00:26:06.460 --> 00:26:10.820
But even a victory of planning will not mean the end of history.

333
00:26:10.820 --> 00:26:15.060
Atrocious wars among the candidates for the Supreme Office will break out.

334
00:26:15.060 --> 00:26:21.300
Totalitarianism may wipe out civilization, even the whole of the human race.

335
00:26:21.300 --> 00:26:25.060
Then of course, history will have come to its end, too.
