WEBVTT

NOTE Why Free Markets Matter

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:15.000
All right, for our closing act today, we have a senior fellow at the Mises Institute, holds a bachelor's degree from Harvard, PhD from Columbia, has written a number of books.

2
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:20.000
He had a New York Times bestseller and a politically incorrect guide to American history.

3
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:24.000
He wrote the 33 questions about American history you're not supposed to ask.

4
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:30.280
Church in the Market, and of course last year he hit the New York Times bestseller list again with Meltdown.

5
00:00:30.280 --> 00:00:37.400
He's got a new book coming out called Nullification that I understand is going to be his hottest book yet.

6
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:41.920
He has conveniently changed the title of his speech.

7
00:00:43.040 --> 00:00:48.320
So if you were hoping to hear about applying economics to American history, you will not hear about that,

8
00:00:48.720 --> 00:00:53.120
but you will hear about Tom Woods's Perfect World, I think, more or less.

9
00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:58.000
Please help me welcome Mr. Thomas Woods.

10
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:08.000
Okay. Thank you very much.

11
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:15.000
Yeah, I am sorry about changing the topic at the last minute, but this is the exact, that's the exact topic I spoke about at the last one of these.

12
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:19.000
So if you're dying to hear that, you can go to YouTube and type in, you know,

13
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:21.000
Applying Economics to American History

14
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:25.000
Which may be the dullest title of any topic ever given

15
00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:27.000
But actually it turned out okay

16
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:29.000
Actually it was one of the better ones

17
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:31.000
So you can watch it

18
00:01:31.000 --> 00:01:34.000
But today we're going to talk about something different

19
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:37.000
Basically what I want to do, since I've got you guys here

20
00:01:37.000 --> 00:01:41.000
Is sort of say the sorts of things that I would say

21
00:01:41.000 --> 00:01:45.000
If I had the attention of the whole world for a half an hour

22
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:50.000
If I wanted to talk to them about the market economy in particular, what would I say to them?

23
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.000
I got half an hour, and that's all they're giving me. What would I say?

24
00:01:54.000 --> 00:01:59.000
Well, I want to start off by, first of all, considering what exactly is the free market economy?

25
00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:06.000
This is an easy question to answer, but the so-called experts try to make it difficult for us.

26
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:14.000
So that is to say, a lot of people going through school get very much caricatured definitions of what a free market is.

27
00:02:14.000 --> 00:02:37.000
The free market economy is simply defined. Free market is simply the sum total of voluntary exchanges bounded by private property rights. That's all it is. It's just individuals freely exchanging one thing for another.

28
00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:41.000
And very often one of those things is money, money for some good.

29
00:02:41.000 --> 00:02:44.000
That's all it is, just people making voluntary exchanges.

30
00:02:44.000 --> 00:02:50.000
And yet, these voluntary exchanges give rise to extraordinary things.

31
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:57.000
Dr. Thornton told you this morning about the miracle of the freaking pencil, for heaven's sake.

32
00:02:57.000 --> 00:03:03.000
A pencil, a dumb little pencil requires this extraordinary structure of production all over the world,

33
00:03:03.000 --> 00:03:33.000
in the world coming together at just the right moment and just the right quantities and there are no surpluses or shortages and this all occurs spontaneously without the need for any global pencil planning board and earlier this week I was at an investment conference and I was giving an example like that and I said isn't it amazing that we can get through our lives without you know a man's hat planning board in the world and somebody in the audience said well not yet anyway and I thought yeah unfortunately

34
00:03:33.000 --> 00:03:38.000
This seems to be the way things are going. Before you know it, there will be a planning board. We don't need it. That's the point.

35
00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:44.000
The free market suffices to bring about these miracles on a daily basis.

36
00:03:44.000 --> 00:03:48.000
Murray Rothbard was fond of giving the example of the ham sandwich.

37
00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:53.000
If you look at all the different stages of production that go into the production of a ham sandwich,

38
00:03:53.000 --> 00:03:56.000
think about having a storefront that sells ham sandwiches.

39
00:03:56.000 --> 00:03:59.000
Well, what does that storefront need? It's got to have refrigeration units.

40
00:03:59.000 --> 00:04:01.500
So right away, what does a refrigeration unit require?

41
00:04:01.500 --> 00:04:07.000
Well, it's going to be made out of steel and rubber and other things, and those have production processes of their own.

42
00:04:07.000 --> 00:04:09.500
All kinds of things are necessary just for the storefront.

43
00:04:09.500 --> 00:04:15.000
The ham is going to be brought to you, it's going to be transported from a wholesaler,

44
00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:19.500
who's going to get it from a meatpacker, who gets it from a slaughterhouse, who gets it from a farmer,

45
00:04:19.500 --> 00:04:22.500
who has to feed his pigs with corn grown somewhere else.

46
00:04:22.500 --> 00:04:26.500
And this is just the level of the ham, forget about anything else on the sandwich.

47
00:04:26.500 --> 00:04:32.500
all these things by all these independent suppliers who are not owned by the same firm typically

48
00:04:32.500 --> 00:04:40.500
and who are not centrally directed. Nevertheless, all this stuff occurs without the need for any central coordination.

49
00:04:40.500 --> 00:04:44.500
And in fact, when you think about it, there is no human being on earth who would even...

50
00:04:44.500 --> 00:04:49.500
even if he wanted to follow all those steps necessary for the ham sandwich,

51
00:04:49.500 --> 00:04:55.500
there isn't a single person on earth who would have the technological expertise in all the necessary fields.

52
00:04:55.500 --> 00:05:03.000
Who knows about mining, and also knows about putting refrigeration units together, and also knows about building construction?

53
00:05:03.000 --> 00:05:06.800
No one has that kind of knowledge all in his one head.

54
00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:12.000
So the free market allows us, even though we have puny heads as individuals,

55
00:05:12.000 --> 00:05:16.500
to take advantage of the knowledge contained in everybody's head.

56
00:05:16.500 --> 00:05:22.400
We can all put it together, and it's far greater than the mere parts.

57
00:05:22.400 --> 00:05:31.840
Now, you would never guess that the free market system, first of all, is socially desirable,

58
00:05:31.840 --> 00:05:33.940
based on what we learn about in school.

59
00:05:33.940 --> 00:05:39.280
You would be inclined to think that the free market system is a system in which little

60
00:05:39.280 --> 00:05:45.160
kids have to work in mines all day and get their limbs blown off, and that's the end

61
00:05:45.160 --> 00:05:46.160
of it.

62
00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:49.560
I mean, we all got that in school, or maybe some of you folks might have been able to

63
00:05:49.560 --> 00:06:19.560
to avoid it but that's the sort of thing that we get and it's just horrific and so that's sort of what I'm talking about today is to try to dispel some of this so that we understand the free market correctly and also to point out that any any derogation from the free market anytime we move away from the free market involves violence necessarily involves violence the free market is an arena of peace peaceful interaction among people and if you interfere with it but then by definition you're introducing violence or the threat of violence into the equation so here's a

64
00:06:19.560 --> 00:06:26.440
Here's a little useful mechanism, a device when you're listening to a political speech

65
00:06:26.440 --> 00:06:29.520
or presidential speech, doesn't matter what party.

66
00:06:29.520 --> 00:06:35.080
When you hear the president make a promise, I will do thus and so, I will increase the

67
00:06:35.080 --> 00:06:41.680
number of thus and so, mentally add the words, with a gun, to the end of each sentence.

68
00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:43.640
Because that's ultimately what it is.

69
00:06:43.640 --> 00:06:49.640
Every promise that is being transmitted to you involves the use of a gun.

70
00:06:49.640 --> 00:06:54.840
In effect, the president is saying, I'm going to set aside the free results of voluntary

71
00:06:54.840 --> 00:07:00.720
interaction between rational human beings, and I'm instead going to introduce violence.

72
00:07:00.720 --> 00:07:05.580
Now, I know my mother taught me violence never accomplished anything, and violence is the

73
00:07:05.580 --> 00:07:09.560
tool of the ignorant, so why don't we turn this back on our politicians when they so

74
00:07:09.560 --> 00:07:11.800
eagerly introduce it?

75
00:07:11.800 --> 00:07:19.280
You'd also never guess that world poverty has declined dramatically in direct proportion

76
00:07:19.280 --> 00:07:22.920
to the spread of market institutions around the world.

77
00:07:22.920 --> 00:07:27.260
Now over the course of the past half century we have seen economic liberalization, liberal

78
00:07:27.260 --> 00:07:30.960
in the best sense of that word, in many parts of the world.

79
00:07:30.960 --> 00:07:35.960
Now to be sure we haven't seen enough of it, it hasn't been extensive enough, but nevertheless

80
00:07:35.960 --> 00:07:41.960
Yes, we have seen it, and as a result, we have seen extraordinary progress against poverty.

81
00:07:41.960 --> 00:07:45.160
And these are statistics, I'm about to give you, these are statistics that you can get

82
00:07:45.160 --> 00:07:49.560
from the World Bank mainstream sources that are easily consulted.

83
00:07:49.560 --> 00:07:54.600
These are not coming from the Tom Woods Wicked Free Market Statistical Fund.

84
00:07:54.600 --> 00:07:59.280
These are easily consulted, and yet we don't hear about them at all.

85
00:07:59.280 --> 00:08:03.240
That in the past 50 years, we've seen more progress against poverty around the world

86
00:08:03.240 --> 00:08:13.440
In 1820, the percentage of people who lived in what economists call absolute poverty was

87
00:08:13.440 --> 00:08:15.560
85 percent.

88
00:08:15.560 --> 00:08:18.800
By 1950, it was 50 percent.

89
00:08:18.800 --> 00:08:23.040
By the early 1980s, it was down to 33 percent.

90
00:08:23.040 --> 00:08:28.800
In the developing world, the rate of poverty has gone, again, absolute poverty has gone

91
00:08:28.800 --> 00:08:36.840
It's gone from the early 1980s, went from about 40% to in the early 2000s down to 21%.

92
00:08:36.840 --> 00:08:44.440
In the world as a whole, it's gone from 33% to 18% over that same two-decade period.

93
00:08:44.440 --> 00:08:49.680
Now this is the first time in history that we have seen a two-decade period in which

94
00:08:49.680 --> 00:08:54.820
not just the percentage but also the absolute number of people living in absolute poverty

95
00:08:54.820 --> 00:08:56.820
has declined.

96
00:08:56.820 --> 00:09:01.460
We've seen since the 1960s that the caloric intake on average in the developing world has

97
00:09:01.460 --> 00:09:03.900
increased by 30 percent.

98
00:09:03.900 --> 00:09:08.500
We've seen life expectancies increase again very substantially to the point where they're

99
00:09:08.500 --> 00:09:12.340
beginning to catch up with life expectancy in the developed world.

100
00:09:12.340 --> 00:09:15.980
And this is happening every single day and we hear nothing about this.

101
00:09:15.980 --> 00:09:19.740
I mean, you'd think this would be like somebody would write one article about it in the New

102
00:09:19.740 --> 00:09:20.740
York Times, right?

103
00:09:20.740 --> 00:09:23.740
I mean, it'd be something, but by and large nothing.

104
00:09:23.740 --> 00:09:27.240
I mean, to the contrary, this is the opposite of what we're led to believe.

105
00:09:27.240 --> 00:09:29.740
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

106
00:09:29.740 --> 00:09:31.140
Well, that's not true.

107
00:09:31.140 --> 00:09:35.340
I mean, well, some of the rich are getting richer because they're jerks who have political connections

108
00:09:35.340 --> 00:09:36.940
and they're looting the rest of the population.

109
00:09:36.940 --> 00:09:38.540
I don't support that.

110
00:09:38.540 --> 00:09:43.340
But the poor are managing to escape poverty at a rate never before seen.

111
00:09:43.340 --> 00:09:49.040
Now, it could be that that's just a coincidence, that we had these market reforms and then

112
00:09:49.040 --> 00:09:52.480
poverty declined, but maybe the two things have nothing to do with each other.

113
00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:57.880
These are entirely unrelated, but here I want to suggest that they are related, and I want

114
00:09:57.880 --> 00:10:01.640
to do so by using a thought experiment that I used at the last one of these events, but

115
00:10:01.640 --> 00:10:07.040
it's important and I do want to do this just this one additional time.

116
00:10:07.040 --> 00:10:11.560
Let's imagine what would happen if we lived in a world in which all the machines we used

117
00:10:11.560 --> 00:10:15.680
to produce things were ferreted away by Martians.

118
00:10:15.680 --> 00:10:16.680
So they're all gone.

119
00:10:16.680 --> 00:10:21.960
We have no assembly line machinery, no capital equipment, nothing.

120
00:10:21.960 --> 00:10:28.320
Everything we used for transportation is all gone except horses. You can ride on horseback.

121
00:10:28.320 --> 00:10:33.720
And everything we used for communication purposes is gone, other than the telegraph. I will

122
00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:39.140
grant you the telegraph, given that 99% of us have no idea how to use it, the thing.

123
00:10:39.140 --> 00:10:43.640
And now you've got to go and try and produce. Go ahead and produce with your bare hands.

124
00:10:43.640 --> 00:10:48.760
You and your telegraph and your horse and see how much you can produce. Well, you plus

125
00:10:48.760 --> 00:10:52.200
Plus lots of machines equals lots of output.

126
00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:56.360
You plus nothing equals very little output.

127
00:10:56.360 --> 00:10:57.360
That's the difference.

128
00:10:57.360 --> 00:11:02.560
This economy is not going to be able to produce a tiny fraction of the goods we used to have.

129
00:11:02.560 --> 00:11:05.200
And there will be whole classes of goods we won't be able to produce at all.

130
00:11:05.200 --> 00:11:09.000
Try producing a flat screen TV with your bare hands from beginning to end.

131
00:11:09.000 --> 00:11:11.000
Cannot be done.

132
00:11:11.000 --> 00:11:14.180
Now in that environment, we would be poor.

133
00:11:14.180 --> 00:11:15.180
We would all be poor.

134
00:11:15.180 --> 00:11:24.180
For our capital, there would be so few consumer goods produced for each of us to use because the economy is simply not physically productive enough to produce them.

135
00:11:24.180 --> 00:11:33.180
It would not be that there are some rich people in the world who are hoarding all the flat-screen TVs for themselves and refusing to share them with us.

136
00:11:33.180 --> 00:11:35.180
No, there are no flat-screen TVs in this world.

137
00:11:35.180 --> 00:11:42.180
So we understand the problem in that world would not be that our bosses are wickedly depriving us of the fruits of our labor.

138
00:11:42.180 --> 00:11:46.300
labor and if only they would we could enforce a minimum wage on them then we

139
00:11:46.300 --> 00:11:50.700
could all enjoy steak dinners and flat-screen TVs and automobiles. Now it

140
00:11:50.700 --> 00:11:53.980
doesn't matter how much you make them pay the dollar bills won't be able to

141
00:11:53.980 --> 00:11:58.020
buy you things that don't exist or things that can be produced only in

142
00:11:58.020 --> 00:12:03.780
very very limited quantities. So we would have to maybe triple the amount of hours

143
00:12:03.780 --> 00:12:07.920
we work we have to go from 40 to 120 hours and even tripling our hours with

144
00:12:07.920 --> 00:12:12.320
With our crummy bare hands, it would still have a negligible effect on output.

145
00:12:12.320 --> 00:12:15.960
So we'd be working an exhausting schedule for a pittance.

146
00:12:15.960 --> 00:12:19.400
Now if this were junior high school, this would be where your teacher would come in

147
00:12:19.400 --> 00:12:23.360
and say, you see, isn't that terrible that on the free market people have to work constantly

148
00:12:23.360 --> 00:12:24.920
and they just get a lousy pittance?

149
00:12:24.920 --> 00:12:26.940
Isn't that terrible?

150
00:12:26.940 --> 00:12:29.120
But you see, that's not the free market's fault.

151
00:12:29.120 --> 00:12:31.960
That's the fault of the fact that somebody took all our machines away.

152
00:12:31.960 --> 00:12:36.800
Well, imagine an economy in which that wasn't some nightmare scenario that we just woke

153
00:12:36.800 --> 00:12:40.800
I'm going to look up to find the machines taken by Martians, imagine that's reality.

154
00:12:40.800 --> 00:12:44.800
Well that was the economy 250 years ago, that was reality.

155
00:12:44.800 --> 00:12:48.800
That was what people lived in, and yes they did earn very little, but again not because

156
00:12:48.800 --> 00:12:52.800
short men with white mustaches running around carrying sacks of money

157
00:12:52.800 --> 00:12:56.800
with dollar signs on them were keeping all the money.

158
00:12:56.800 --> 00:13:00.800
It was because the economy was not physically productive enough to allow us all

159
00:13:00.800 --> 00:13:04.800
to enjoy that level of goods that we're accustomed to today.

160
00:13:04.800 --> 00:13:07.320
So how would we get out of that scenario?

161
00:13:07.320 --> 00:13:10.480
How do we get out of the rotten scenario where all we've got is the telegraph, the

162
00:13:10.480 --> 00:13:11.480
horse and our bare hands?

163
00:13:11.480 --> 00:13:17.600
The answer is the free market because on the free market businesses make profits and they

164
00:13:17.600 --> 00:13:22.080
take the profits and they don't just go blow them on yachts, they invest the profits.

165
00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:27.900
They invest them in buying capital equipment to make their production process more physically

166
00:13:27.900 --> 00:13:33.280
productive so they can produce more goods at lower cost and the existence of an abundance

167
00:13:33.280 --> 00:13:42.280
The abundance of goods is going to push those prices down so that when we spend our paychecks we'll be able to get in return for those dollars a lot more goods because they'll exist in such great abundance.

168
00:13:42.280 --> 00:13:56.280
This happens automatically on the free market. It's in the interests of businessmen to want to expand their production capacity, to want to invest their profits in the expansion of that capacity by investing in capital equipment.

169
00:13:56.280 --> 00:14:02.280
That's how it happens. That occurs on the free market when you don't tax this process.

170
00:14:02.280 --> 00:14:08.280
If you tax this process, then in effect what you're saying is, I'm an enemy of mankind.

171
00:14:08.280 --> 00:14:11.280
I don't want to see mankind improve its standard of living.

172
00:14:11.280 --> 00:14:20.280
I don't want to support the one process that allows society as a whole to become wealthier and enjoy a higher standard of living.

173
00:14:20.280 --> 00:14:25.280
No, I am so full of envy that I would rather see us all starve to death than make that sort of advance.

174
00:14:25.280 --> 00:14:28.280
That's kind of implicitly what you're saying. Maybe you don't totally realize that's what you're saying,

175
00:14:28.280 --> 00:14:31.280
but I'm trying to let people know that is kind of what you're saying if you're doing that.

176
00:14:31.280 --> 00:14:49.280
As Frederic Bastiat said, in a single day, under the miracle of a market economy, the average worker consumes more than he could himself produce in ten centuries.

177
00:14:49.280 --> 00:14:58.280
So, everyone benefits, and we also see that this idea of the survival of the fittest is also nonsense.

178
00:14:58.280 --> 00:15:03.280
That the free market is the area of the survival of the fittest. Only the fittest survive.

179
00:15:03.280 --> 00:15:10.280
Well, it seems to me the free market makes it possible for a whole lot more people to be alive in the first place.

180
00:15:10.280 --> 00:15:14.280
A whole lot of people who, if they were living in a primitive pre-market society,

181
00:15:14.280 --> 00:15:18.120
Society, and had to fend for themselves to provide food and clothing for themselves would

182
00:15:18.120 --> 00:15:20.160
probably be dead.

183
00:15:20.160 --> 00:15:23.480
The free market produces enough wealth that we can support all these people.

184
00:15:23.480 --> 00:15:28.400
So it's not the survival of the fittest at all, it's the survival of everybody.

185
00:15:28.400 --> 00:15:33.280
Here's George Reisman, an economist I like very much, speaking on precisely this.

186
00:15:33.280 --> 00:15:38.600
He says, totally unlike lions in the jungle, who must compete for a limited supply of animals

187
00:15:38.600 --> 00:15:44.000
such as zebras and gazelles by means of the power of their senses and limbs, producers

188
00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:48.720
Manufacturers under capitalism are in competition for a limited supply of dollars in the hands

189
00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:54.760
of consumers, which they compete for by means of offering the best and most economical products

190
00:15:54.760 --> 00:15:57.440
their minds can devise.

191
00:15:57.440 --> 00:16:02.200
Since such competition is a competition in the positive creation of new and additional

192
00:16:02.200 --> 00:16:06.880
wealth, there are no genuine long-run losers as the result of it.

193
00:16:06.880 --> 00:16:08.320
There are only winners.

194
00:16:08.320 --> 00:16:09.560
And he goes on,

195
00:16:09.560 --> 00:16:14.440
The competition of farmers and farm equipment manufacturers enables the hungry and weak

196
00:16:14.440 --> 00:16:16.680
to eat and grow strong.

197
00:16:16.680 --> 00:16:20.960
That of pharmaceutical manufacturers enables the sick to recover their health.

198
00:16:20.960 --> 00:16:25.600
The competition of eyeglass and hearing aid manufacturers enables many who otherwise could

199
00:16:25.600 --> 00:16:28.360
not see or hear to do so.

200
00:16:28.360 --> 00:16:33.360
So far from being a competition whose outcome is the survival of the fittest, the competition

201
00:16:33.360 --> 00:16:38.320
of capitalism is more accurately described as a competition whose outcome is the survival

202
00:16:38.320 --> 00:16:44.040
of all, or at least of more and more, for longer and longer and ever better.

203
00:16:44.040 --> 00:16:49.520
The only sense in which only the fittest survive is that it is the fittest products and the

204
00:16:49.520 --> 00:16:55.640
fittest methods of production that survive, until replaced by still fitter products and

205
00:16:55.640 --> 00:16:58.280
methods of production.

206
00:16:58.280 --> 00:17:00.120
Now let's consider the alternative.

207
00:17:00.120 --> 00:17:03.080
Instead of investing in capital equipment so that we become wealthier, why don't we

208
00:17:03.080 --> 00:17:06.040
just steal from the rich people, like wouldn't that be a lot quicker?

209
00:17:06.040 --> 00:17:08.040
I mean, they have to sleep sometime, right?

210
00:17:08.040 --> 00:17:12.040
So we just go in and grab their stuff and then just hand it out to people.

211
00:17:12.040 --> 00:17:15.040
Well, Reisman anticipates this, too. He says, all right, imagine you've got a society,

212
00:17:15.040 --> 00:17:21.040
this would be very typical, primitive economy, and one out of every thousand people is a rich capitalist.

213
00:17:21.040 --> 00:17:26.040
He says, let's imagine this. One out of every thousand people eats twice as much

214
00:17:26.040 --> 00:17:30.040
and has 20 times the furniture as the average person.

215
00:17:30.040 --> 00:17:35.040
He says, now, what would happen if we took this rich person's greater than average consumption,

216
00:17:35.040 --> 00:17:42.360
of Consumption. Divided it by 999 and then redistributed across the society. Nobody's

217
00:17:42.360 --> 00:17:47.440
even going to notice the difference. Oh, wonderful. I have one fortieth of a table leg. What a

218
00:17:47.440 --> 00:17:51.500
contribution to my standard of living. No one would even notice the difference, number

219
00:17:51.500 --> 00:17:56.520
one. So just on practical grounds, it wouldn't work. Apart from the moral question of maybe

220
00:17:56.520 --> 00:18:00.720
stealing we probably should avoid doing, but just practically. There isn't enough stuff

221
00:18:00.720 --> 00:18:04.760
that they own for this to work. Secondly, they're probably not going to keep working

222
00:18:04.760 --> 00:18:09.760
And I'm wondering if they know that every time they stop working and go to sleep, people take their stuff.

223
00:18:09.760 --> 00:18:12.760
They'll just go to sleep and become takers themselves.

224
00:18:12.760 --> 00:18:15.760
And so much for wealth creation.

225
00:18:15.760 --> 00:18:18.760
But also, and not only does it lower capital formation,

226
00:18:18.760 --> 00:18:21.760
because there'll be less saving, less investment if we do this,

227
00:18:21.760 --> 00:18:23.760
but also it feeds on itself.

228
00:18:23.760 --> 00:18:27.760
And what I mean by that is a lot of times we'll read articles in which people will say,

229
00:18:27.760 --> 00:18:36.060
You know, it would cost only X billion dollars to give every American, fill in the blank,

230
00:18:36.060 --> 00:18:40.440
whatever it is, a free Cadillac, whatever the benefit is, it would cost only X billion

231
00:18:40.440 --> 00:18:45.400
dollars to give every American below a particular income level, fill in the blank.

232
00:18:45.400 --> 00:18:49.720
The problem with that line of reasoning is that once people realize that if I get below

233
00:18:49.720 --> 00:18:53.960
this level, I get a free Cadillac, what do you think they're going to do?

234
00:18:53.960 --> 00:18:59.960
It becomes more attractive to put yourself in the situation that entitles you to the benefit.

235
00:18:59.960 --> 00:19:03.160
So the initial cost estimate will always be too low, because it'll turn out,

236
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:07.360
oh, wait a minute, there are a lot more people than we thought who qualify for the Free Cadillac.

237
00:19:07.360 --> 00:19:09.760
Oh, well, you don't say.

238
00:19:09.760 --> 00:19:17.160
And so what winds up happening is that a larger and larger group of people clamoring for free stuff

239
00:19:17.160 --> 00:19:22.060
is being supported by an ever-shrinking pool of productive human beings

240
00:19:22.060 --> 00:19:25.300
who are the suckers who are pouring all the wealth in that makes this possible.

241
00:19:25.300 --> 00:19:33.600
So again, it undermines the path to prosperity that occurs without violence on a free market.

242
00:19:33.600 --> 00:19:37.440
You may have noticed that we sell t-shirts with economists' faces on them here at the

243
00:19:37.440 --> 00:19:38.440
Mises Institute.

244
00:19:38.440 --> 00:19:42.760
I don't know if anybody else does that, doesn't make it bad.

245
00:19:42.760 --> 00:19:45.580
My own wife, I think, feels a little funny about this.

246
00:19:45.580 --> 00:19:50.280
She has not really given me too much grief about it, but I think the understanding is

247
00:19:50.280 --> 00:19:56.700
is that I am just about hitting the level at which the dorkiness is to the point where

248
00:19:56.700 --> 00:20:00.540
she just can't tolerate it anymore. She's been more than reasonable up to now. But the

249
00:20:00.540 --> 00:20:05.240
economist on the t-shirts, but one of the t-shirts I have is the Frederic Bastiat t-shirt.

250
00:20:05.240 --> 00:20:10.780
I love it because it says on it economic harmonies, which is one of his works. And I love that

251
00:20:10.780 --> 00:20:16.160
work, and I love that phrase because precisely he is saying that in the economy we do not

252
00:20:16.160 --> 00:20:22.160
does not have natural antagonisms, that the market economy, properly understood, does not have natural antagonisms,

253
00:20:22.160 --> 00:20:26.160
not between employers and workers, not between lenders and borrowers.

254
00:20:26.160 --> 00:20:30.160
The market is a peaceful arena of large-scale social cooperation.

255
00:20:30.160 --> 00:20:35.160
You need large-scale social cooperation, as we've seen, to produce even a pencil or a ham sandwich.

256
00:20:35.160 --> 00:20:40.160
And we see this occurring all the time, voluntarily, on the market.

257
00:20:40.160 --> 00:20:50.660
And we likewise perceive a natural order of things, which if we interfere with it, if we interfere with these harmonies, we get problems.

258
00:20:50.660 --> 00:20:55.660
If we introduce a gun into this peaceful environment, we get problems.

259
00:20:55.660 --> 00:21:04.160
So for example, prices. Now you all know if you interfere with prices, you're going to wind up with either surpluses of goods or shortages of goods, depending on how you interfere.

260
00:21:04.160 --> 00:21:09.660
So let's imagine that we want to push the price of something lower. Let's say it's lumber.

261
00:21:09.660 --> 00:21:13.520
Lumber is too expensive. Let's push the price lower. What's going to happen?

262
00:21:14.080 --> 00:21:19.740
Well, what's going to happen is fewer people are going to supply lumber because it'll be less profitable to do so and a lot more

263
00:21:19.740 --> 00:21:24.340
people are going to demand it. People who wouldn't have wanted to build a birdhouse before,

264
00:21:24.340 --> 00:21:28.860
but now they see lumber is only half as expensive, saying, well, you know what, maybe I will build a birdhouse.

265
00:21:28.860 --> 00:21:33.240
Why the heck not? You know, I'm a loser. I might as well build a birdhouse. Sure.

266
00:21:34.140 --> 00:21:36.140
I don't know why I said that. It's perfectly fine.

267
00:21:36.140 --> 00:21:43.140
I'm perfectly fine to build a birdhouse, just filling in some space there.

268
00:21:43.140 --> 00:21:46.300
But you notice what's going to happen is, okay, everybody wants it, nobody's supplying

269
00:21:46.300 --> 00:21:47.300
it.

270
00:21:47.300 --> 00:21:48.300
That's going to be the problem.

271
00:21:48.300 --> 00:21:51.820
Now, you see, now a lot of people sort of get that today, but you will nevertheless

272
00:21:51.820 --> 00:21:56.300
see if they'll say there's a hurricane that hit some place and people's houses have collapsed

273
00:21:56.300 --> 00:21:58.420
and suddenly lumber prices will shoot up.

274
00:21:58.420 --> 00:22:03.340
People will say, gosh, that free market, the free market with those greedy people there,

275
00:22:03.340 --> 00:22:05.540
those raising prices, that's terrible.

276
00:22:05.540 --> 00:22:09.380
We should push prices back down to just the way they were before.

277
00:22:09.380 --> 00:22:11.460
What's the result of that going to be?

278
00:22:11.460 --> 00:22:14.980
People are trying to rebuild their houses, and now you're going to have a million people

279
00:22:14.980 --> 00:22:18.700
demanding lumber at that price, and no one in his right mind is going to want to supply

280
00:22:18.700 --> 00:22:21.220
it at that price, in that amount.

281
00:22:21.220 --> 00:22:24.460
And so most people are going to have to go without houses at all.

282
00:22:24.460 --> 00:22:29.460
And somehow this is supposed to be more humane than the market saying, look, right now, see,

283
00:22:29.460 --> 00:22:32.220
we did just have this hurricane, so you'll understand there's a little bit of a strain

284
00:22:32.220 --> 00:22:33.800
going on on the lumber supply.

285
00:22:33.800 --> 00:22:39.080
So we're all going to have to understand here, we've got to move with caution on the lumber.

286
00:22:39.080 --> 00:22:45.120
If the lumber price stays high, you know, I'm some guy in Auburn, and just so as to rehabilitate

287
00:22:45.120 --> 00:22:48.440
the birdhouse builders, let's say I'm a birdhouse builder, okay?

288
00:22:48.440 --> 00:22:52.560
I'm building a birdhouse, I may decide when I see that the lumber price is high, I may

289
00:22:52.560 --> 00:22:55.680
decide, nah, you know what, the birds can fend for themselves, right, they've been around

290
00:22:55.680 --> 00:22:58.840
a long time, they know what they're doing, deck with it, I'm not going to waste my money

291
00:22:58.840 --> 00:22:59.840
at this time.

292
00:22:59.840 --> 00:23:09.840
That decision on my part to relinquish my right to build a birdhouse releases lumber for somebody else to use to build an extremely tiny house for himself.

293
00:23:09.840 --> 00:23:16.840
But you understand the point that the price makes me economize on the existing supply.

294
00:23:16.840 --> 00:23:22.840
And it makes sure that I use that existing supply only for the most serious and urgent purposes.

295
00:23:22.840 --> 00:23:27.840
That I don't use lumber to build a doghouse at a time when people are homeless.

296
00:23:27.840 --> 00:23:31.840
that it makes sure that things go to their most highly valued ends.

297
00:23:31.840 --> 00:23:34.840
Or during the 1970s, during the oil crisis,

298
00:23:34.840 --> 00:23:40.840
people, through the price system, could not indicate the relative urgency of their various needs

299
00:23:40.840 --> 00:23:42.840
for oil and oil products.

300
00:23:42.840 --> 00:23:47.840
And the result was that some trucks carrying shipments of food

301
00:23:47.840 --> 00:23:51.840
a lot of times didn't want to drive to bring food to South Florida

302
00:23:51.840 --> 00:23:55.840
because they were afraid they wouldn't be able to get the fuel necessary to make the return trip

303
00:23:55.840 --> 00:24:13.840
Because artificially low prices meant there was huge demand, shortages, and so here we have probably the most important thing of all, bringing food to people, and yet they can't outbid some other people who might be engaged in more trivial uses, they can't outbid them for the resource, they can't use the price system of the free market.

304
00:24:13.840 --> 00:24:29.840
This is one of my favorite examples. Oil rigs themselves, off the coast of Louisiana, the continuing functioning of oil rigs themselves was jeopardized because of the price control.

305
00:24:29.840 --> 00:24:39.840
So here we are trying to presumably get out from under this oil crisis. We're making it difficult for oil rigs themselves to get enough oil products to produce more oil.

306
00:24:39.840 --> 00:24:45.360
Oil, I mean it's that perverse, that's the consequence of interfering with the market.

307
00:24:45.360 --> 00:24:50.240
Now if you interfere with money, as Professor Salerno pointed out, if a central bank interferes

308
00:24:50.240 --> 00:24:56.200
with money and artificially pushes interest rates low, there are consequences to that.

309
00:24:56.200 --> 00:24:59.840
Namely you get the business cycle, which we understand the Austrian theory of the business

310
00:24:59.840 --> 00:25:05.320
cycle is being discussed quite a bit these days in light of the crisis that we've been

311
00:25:05.320 --> 00:25:10.320
and Enduring and you can learn an awful lot about that through the Mises Institute.

312
00:25:10.320 --> 00:25:17.080
Now Murray Rothbard spoke in Man, Economy and State, his great treatise.

313
00:25:17.080 --> 00:25:21.600
He spoke of the beautiful order of the market and what's notable about this is that if you've

314
00:25:21.600 --> 00:25:27.420
read a lot of Rothbard's popular writings aimed at the general public, he can be really

315
00:25:27.420 --> 00:25:32.440
feisty and polemical and you can almost hear him talking coming through the page.

316
00:25:32.440 --> 00:25:37.840
So when you read his great treatise, Man Economy and State, his style is much more restrained

317
00:25:37.840 --> 00:25:42.480
and sober and scientific, relentlessly so.

318
00:25:42.480 --> 00:25:48.080
But yet even there, he can't restrain himself on several occasions from pointing out the

319
00:25:48.080 --> 00:25:53.540
beautiful order of the market as he's covering production theory and factor pricing, pricing

320
00:25:53.540 --> 00:25:57.640
of the factors of production and the structure of production and how it all interlocks and

321
00:25:57.640 --> 00:26:02.920
interweaves again spontaneously without the need for any central direction.

322
00:26:02.920 --> 00:26:07.560
This is beautiful, it's elegant, it works on its own.

323
00:26:07.560 --> 00:26:11.280
This is what we mean by the natural order.

324
00:26:11.280 --> 00:26:18.280
And this is why Ludwig von Mises said that dictators hate economists.

325
00:26:18.280 --> 00:26:23.040
Well they hate good economists, we'll correct Mises slightly, because after all John Maynard

326
00:26:23.040 --> 00:26:29.040
Dr. Keynes once said that his system was perhaps more suited to a totalitarian state than to a free one.

327
00:26:29.040 --> 00:26:31.040
So maybe they might sort of like that.

328
00:26:31.040 --> 00:26:35.040
But what Mises meant is that the economist is always telling you that there are costs.

329
00:26:35.040 --> 00:26:39.040
And there are costs in particular of intervening in the free market.

330
00:26:39.040 --> 00:26:43.040
When you override the natural order, you cannot do so costlessly.

331
00:26:43.040 --> 00:26:46.040
There will always be consequences.

332
00:26:46.040 --> 00:26:52.040
No matter how great a dictator you are, you cannot override the laws of the free market.

333
00:26:52.040 --> 00:26:57.640
No dictator wants to be told this. Why? I'm the dictator. My will is law.

334
00:26:57.640 --> 00:26:59.040
Okay?

335
00:26:59.040 --> 00:27:05.840
But just in the same way that a dictator can't jump off a cliff and start screaming at the law of gravity to allow him to have a soft landing,

336
00:27:05.840 --> 00:27:15.940
likewise, he can't interfere with money, interest rates, prices, or any of the other aspects of the market economy without tears.

337
00:27:15.940 --> 00:27:20.540
Finally, Austrian economics is value-free.

338
00:27:20.540 --> 00:27:26.040
We say it's value-free. That means that Austrian economics, strictly speaking, is purely scientific.

339
00:27:26.040 --> 00:27:31.540
It is positive rather than normative, and all that means is that it's descriptive rather than prescriptive.

340
00:27:31.540 --> 00:27:34.540
It explains to you how the world works.

341
00:27:34.540 --> 00:27:38.040
It does not say, therefore, you should do A, B, C and D.

342
00:27:38.040 --> 00:27:41.540
It simply describes how the world works, strictly speaking.

343
00:27:41.540 --> 00:27:46.540
Now, as a human being, who also happens to be an Austrian economist, you could then turn around and say,

344
00:27:46.540 --> 00:27:50.040
oh, by the way, as a human being, I think we should do this and we shouldn't do that.

345
00:27:50.040 --> 00:27:55.340
But strictly speaking, as an Austrian economist, all you're doing is describing the likely consequences.

346
00:27:55.340 --> 00:28:00.740
But we can move from the one to the other because we realize, when we study Austrian economics,

347
00:28:00.740 --> 00:28:04.140
we come face to face with this natural order.

348
00:28:04.140 --> 00:28:10.940
We come face to face with the theory of it and we perceive it in our daily lives, in reality.

349
00:28:10.940 --> 00:28:16.140
And we realize that when we work to undermine it, we bring about impoverishment.

350
00:28:16.140 --> 00:28:22.980
When we allow it to occur, to take place unhampered, we get wealth and prosperity.

351
00:28:22.980 --> 00:28:28.100
And so since we don't hate the human race and we want wealth and prosperity, therefore

352
00:28:28.100 --> 00:28:30.260
we do favor these various things.

353
00:28:30.260 --> 00:28:35.540
We do favor free exchange among peoples and so on and so forth.

354
00:28:35.540 --> 00:28:40.860
So what we learn from Austrian economics, even though the discipline itself is value-free,

355
00:28:40.860 --> 00:28:43.300
can influence our values.

356
00:28:43.300 --> 00:28:48.540
We can learn from it that the parasitic behavior of the so-called public servants that we're

357
00:28:48.540 --> 00:28:55.240
all taught in our schools to revere in fact impoverishes the productive sector and hampers

358
00:28:55.240 --> 00:29:00.000
if not reverses the process of wealth creation for all classes.

359
00:29:00.000 --> 00:29:06.380
We can learn that central banks are unnecessary, that money always emerges as a commodity on

360
00:29:06.380 --> 00:29:09.120
the free market.

361
00:29:09.120 --> 00:29:15.360
We can learn that the whole apparatus of coercion on the part of the state of violence that

362
00:29:15.360 --> 00:29:21.760
tries to overpower the market is the greatest scam ever perpetrated on mankind.

363
00:29:21.760 --> 00:29:27.000
And finally, we can learn that human beings interacting peacefully and without coercion,

364
00:29:27.000 --> 00:29:33.560
without hangmen and torturers, can establish a society of peace, freedom and prosperity,

365
00:29:33.560 --> 00:29:37.160
the likes of which the world has never seen.

366
00:29:37.160 --> 00:29:49.320
Thank you very much.

367
00:29:49.320 --> 00:29:50.320
Thank you, Tom.

368
00:29:50.320 --> 00:29:58.280
Well, for those who have been held here against their will and hated every minute of it, you

369
00:29:58.280 --> 00:30:00.840
have made it to the promised land.

370
00:30:00.840 --> 00:30:05.240
The program has concluded.

371
00:30:05.240 --> 00:30:09.760
I would like to thank Jerry and Helen Davis for their sponsorship of this event. They

372
00:30:09.760 --> 00:30:15.880
made it all possible. I'd like to thank our speakers and the staff of the Mises Institute

373
00:30:15.880 --> 00:30:23.160
that make these events go off so seamlessly. And I especially want to thank you. I know

374
00:30:23.160 --> 00:30:30.440
many of you spent a lot of time in the car getting here. But you know, you're going

375
00:30:30.440 --> 00:30:34.320
to inherit the world here soon and you can make it a better place. And we think free

376
00:30:34.320 --> 00:30:36.120
Free Markets and Liberty can do that.

377
00:30:36.120 --> 00:30:38.080
So that's my challenge to you.

378
00:30:38.080 --> 00:30:43.060
I want to thank the parents for caring so much about their kids to bring them here today.

379
00:30:43.060 --> 00:30:44.360
Thank you and travel well.
